Confessions of a "Coward"
I've been following the "controversy" over Attorney General Eric Holder's Black History Month speech haphazardly in the mainstream media for the past few days and yesterday I caught a piece on NPR where All Things Considered featured a "debate" between a much out-classed (in very sense of the word) Joe Klein and Professor Michael Eric Dyson of Georgetown University. Klein was shouting like he was auditioning for a the McLaughlin Group. Such a squeaky shout. Of course the schedulers choreographed this match-up to a predictable formula: a White putative liberal arguing, no, we're not a nation of cowards, and a Black liberal scholar arguing that yes, we are. But it got me thinking nonetheless: and while I can't speak for the rest of the nation, on my own behalf I have to plead guilty, with extenuating circumstances. To do this, I need to be a bit biographical: bear with me or yawn and turn to the next blog, as you wish.
I'm 67 years old (for a month or two yet). I grew up in a Swedish enclave in Minneapolis-itself a Swedish enclave. I never saw garlic until I went to college, and when I encountered it the first time, I thought it was a water chestnut-crunchy like, you know? I met my first Black person in eighth grade: my home-room teacher, Mr. Bates. He was the first Black teacher in my junior high, and this was his first year there. There were zero Black students in the school. My grandparents and parents had taught me to be respectful, and they were careful to say Negro, which was the polite thing back in those days. Mr. Bates intrigued me. I think I liked him...but home-room lasted only 20 minutes, so I can't say that I got to know him well-no eighth grader gets to know teachers really well, do they?
I moved on to High School, leaving the public schools to go to the same private school my father had attended. Yup, it served the Swedish community-if someone wasn't a Johnson or a Peterson, one could bet he/she was a Larson or Anderson...occasionally something more exotic like a Nystrom or a Kjellberg. Zero black students in the school. We played the occasional pre-season basketball game with a couple of the city high schools, so my first encounter with Black kids was on the basketball court. I enjoyed and didn't enjoy the experience. The playing was fun: the losing by fairly significant margins was not. And we were good-in our own league.
On to College, where my horizons significantly broadened. After all, that was where I learned about garlic. It was also where I had my first Black classmate: Not an African-American, but an International Student sent to my school by missionaries. His name was Washington Odongo, and yes, he was from the (Belgian) Congo. I can't imagine what it must have been like for him. I know he kept pretty much to himself-not because any of us were hostile to him, we were too polite for that, but perhaps because we treated him like a curiosity.
My college was in Chicago-on the North Side. I perhaps visited the South Side a half dozen times-to go to the Museum of Science and Industry, to take my GRE exams at Illinois Institute of Technology-things like that. But this was the early sixties, and there was racial unrest. The Loop belonged to everyone-not much else did. But every Sunday I visited the South Side. There was a black owned radio station, and from early morning to late evening it broadcast live from one black church to the next black church. I encountered gospel singing and marveled. Had I had the guts, I would have gone to First Church of Deliverance, rather than worship from afar.
On to graduate school in Cleveland. Cleveland was as racially segregated as Chicago, with the exception of Shaker Heights which was making a concerted effort to stay integrated, rather than let redlining and block-busting turn the suburb over. My school was on the border between the Black ghetto to the north and the Italian Ghetto to the south. In graduate school I made my first tentative friendships with blacks: fellow students and residents in the graduate dormitory. I began to realize how little I knew and how much I missed what I didn't know. My awakenings were sometimes rude. A Black woman studying in the law school guffawed, when I called Darius Milhaud's La Creation du Monde "jazzy". How could I be wrong? I read it right off the record jacket. I knew it didn't sound anything like the Preservation Hall Jazz Band, which I had encountered in the first Cinerama movie. It didn't sound anything like Miles Davis or Bessie Smith, either...but I hadn't encountered them-yet.
My politics completed the flip-flop that began in College. I became a Democrat, to the mild unhappiness of my parents. I voted for Carl Stokes, who became the first Black mayor of Cleveland in 1967, but this was through the motions stuff-well meaning, the "right thing to do" along with marching for nuclear disarmament, ending Viet Nam, and in support of Civil Rights. The number of blacks I actually knew could be counted on the fingers of one hand, with a couple of extra fingers left over.
But there were some things changing-some I have not thought about for years. The Cleveland Orchestra Chorus in which I sang under the baton of Robert Shaw, was thoroughly integrated. I can remember hanging out around the pool when we went to Puerto Rico in 1963, and, several years later when a bunch of us, Black and White, went on a boat ride on the Lorraine River, listening to Handel's Water Music or singing "In these delightful pleasant groves" together. Thank you, Robert Shaw-for integrating a chorus both in terms of class and race. I sang with Mel, the postman on one side of me, and a coroner who taught in the medical school on the other. I was awakening to how much I needed diversity, and how sheltered and insular my life had been.
On to work in a small college in New England-in a town which had few if any Black citizens in it. This was 1972. To the best of my memory there were two Blacks employed by the school-one a faculty member and one an electrician. Both are still there now-as am I. I count them both friends now...but it took a long time. Here's where my cowardice struck, and the point of this reminiscence comes here. I was so afraid of saying the wrong thing, of being clumsy, of making a joke which might be taken wrongly, that I said little or nothing more than commonplace pleasantries. And in some ways, I think they felt the same way. Better to smile and keep it cool and pleasant than take the risk of an argument-even though I loved to argue with my white peers.
As I've gotten older, I hope I've gotten wiser. Our campus is far more multi-toned now than it once was. I'm comfortable enough to talk seriously with my Black colleagues, and to crack a joke with them or at their expense-knowing that I'll get the slap-down I deserve if I blunder badly, but that all will be forgiven. I have more black students now-there were hardly any twenty years ago. And I'm brave enough to extend friendship to them. I was rewarded with a surprise tin of cupcakes on my 65th birthday..organized by two delightful young black women.
My sixty-sixth year marked another small step. For the first time ever I slept over at the home of a Black friend, and for the first time ever I had a Black friend guest overnight in my house. Am I a little braver now-I guess I am. I'm still afraid of saying the wrong thing...but then I'm also afraid of saying the wrong thing to Whites I don't know very well.
So I guess I'm concluding that I'm leery of the idea of a collective national dialogue. Not that I think that's a bad idea or an unnecessary thing. But in the sixties I was there and did that. What we need-what I need is more courage to engage in individual dialogues, not so much for the sake of settling anything, but for the wonders and surprises and sheer pleasure of discovery that these can bring.
If anyone wants to invite me over for dinner, I'll contribute lingonberries, sylta, and orange-fennel ryebread. Not pickled pig's feet, though. My Aunt Hannah and Grandpa Hans loved those, but they in their mercy didn't make me eat them.
I'm 67 years old (for a month or two yet). I grew up in a Swedish enclave in Minneapolis-itself a Swedish enclave. I never saw garlic until I went to college, and when I encountered it the first time, I thought it was a water chestnut-crunchy like, you know? I met my first Black person in eighth grade: my home-room teacher, Mr. Bates. He was the first Black teacher in my junior high, and this was his first year there. There were zero Black students in the school. My grandparents and parents had taught me to be respectful, and they were careful to say Negro, which was the polite thing back in those days. Mr. Bates intrigued me. I think I liked him...but home-room lasted only 20 minutes, so I can't say that I got to know him well-no eighth grader gets to know teachers really well, do they?
I moved on to High School, leaving the public schools to go to the same private school my father had attended. Yup, it served the Swedish community-if someone wasn't a Johnson or a Peterson, one could bet he/she was a Larson or Anderson...occasionally something more exotic like a Nystrom or a Kjellberg. Zero black students in the school. We played the occasional pre-season basketball game with a couple of the city high schools, so my first encounter with Black kids was on the basketball court. I enjoyed and didn't enjoy the experience. The playing was fun: the losing by fairly significant margins was not. And we were good-in our own league.
On to College, where my horizons significantly broadened. After all, that was where I learned about garlic. It was also where I had my first Black classmate: Not an African-American, but an International Student sent to my school by missionaries. His name was Washington Odongo, and yes, he was from the (Belgian) Congo. I can't imagine what it must have been like for him. I know he kept pretty much to himself-not because any of us were hostile to him, we were too polite for that, but perhaps because we treated him like a curiosity.
My college was in Chicago-on the North Side. I perhaps visited the South Side a half dozen times-to go to the Museum of Science and Industry, to take my GRE exams at Illinois Institute of Technology-things like that. But this was the early sixties, and there was racial unrest. The Loop belonged to everyone-not much else did. But every Sunday I visited the South Side. There was a black owned radio station, and from early morning to late evening it broadcast live from one black church to the next black church. I encountered gospel singing and marveled. Had I had the guts, I would have gone to First Church of Deliverance, rather than worship from afar.
On to graduate school in Cleveland. Cleveland was as racially segregated as Chicago, with the exception of Shaker Heights which was making a concerted effort to stay integrated, rather than let redlining and block-busting turn the suburb over. My school was on the border between the Black ghetto to the north and the Italian Ghetto to the south. In graduate school I made my first tentative friendships with blacks: fellow students and residents in the graduate dormitory. I began to realize how little I knew and how much I missed what I didn't know. My awakenings were sometimes rude. A Black woman studying in the law school guffawed, when I called Darius Milhaud's La Creation du Monde "jazzy". How could I be wrong? I read it right off the record jacket. I knew it didn't sound anything like the Preservation Hall Jazz Band, which I had encountered in the first Cinerama movie. It didn't sound anything like Miles Davis or Bessie Smith, either...but I hadn't encountered them-yet.
My politics completed the flip-flop that began in College. I became a Democrat, to the mild unhappiness of my parents. I voted for Carl Stokes, who became the first Black mayor of Cleveland in 1967, but this was through the motions stuff-well meaning, the "right thing to do" along with marching for nuclear disarmament, ending Viet Nam, and in support of Civil Rights. The number of blacks I actually knew could be counted on the fingers of one hand, with a couple of extra fingers left over.
But there were some things changing-some I have not thought about for years. The Cleveland Orchestra Chorus in which I sang under the baton of Robert Shaw, was thoroughly integrated. I can remember hanging out around the pool when we went to Puerto Rico in 1963, and, several years later when a bunch of us, Black and White, went on a boat ride on the Lorraine River, listening to Handel's Water Music or singing "In these delightful pleasant groves" together. Thank you, Robert Shaw-for integrating a chorus both in terms of class and race. I sang with Mel, the postman on one side of me, and a coroner who taught in the medical school on the other. I was awakening to how much I needed diversity, and how sheltered and insular my life had been.
On to work in a small college in New England-in a town which had few if any Black citizens in it. This was 1972. To the best of my memory there were two Blacks employed by the school-one a faculty member and one an electrician. Both are still there now-as am I. I count them both friends now...but it took a long time. Here's where my cowardice struck, and the point of this reminiscence comes here. I was so afraid of saying the wrong thing, of being clumsy, of making a joke which might be taken wrongly, that I said little or nothing more than commonplace pleasantries. And in some ways, I think they felt the same way. Better to smile and keep it cool and pleasant than take the risk of an argument-even though I loved to argue with my white peers.
As I've gotten older, I hope I've gotten wiser. Our campus is far more multi-toned now than it once was. I'm comfortable enough to talk seriously with my Black colleagues, and to crack a joke with them or at their expense-knowing that I'll get the slap-down I deserve if I blunder badly, but that all will be forgiven. I have more black students now-there were hardly any twenty years ago. And I'm brave enough to extend friendship to them. I was rewarded with a surprise tin of cupcakes on my 65th birthday..organized by two delightful young black women.
My sixty-sixth year marked another small step. For the first time ever I slept over at the home of a Black friend, and for the first time ever I had a Black friend guest overnight in my house. Am I a little braver now-I guess I am. I'm still afraid of saying the wrong thing...but then I'm also afraid of saying the wrong thing to Whites I don't know very well.
So I guess I'm concluding that I'm leery of the idea of a collective national dialogue. Not that I think that's a bad idea or an unnecessary thing. But in the sixties I was there and did that. What we need-what I need is more courage to engage in individual dialogues, not so much for the sake of settling anything, but for the wonders and surprises and sheer pleasure of discovery that these can bring.
If anyone wants to invite me over for dinner, I'll contribute lingonberries, sylta, and orange-fennel ryebread. Not pickled pig's feet, though. My Aunt Hannah and Grandpa Hans loved those, but they in their mercy didn't make me eat them.
Advertisement












Dialogue? For sure but please no lutfisk.
February 21, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lutfisk falls into the same category as pigs feet, I think... that is 'optional'. Rec´d amike.
February 21, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
When I was growing up Lutefisk was not optional at Christmas. Lutefisk is reconstituted dried cod for those who haven't had the pleasure. Bought, it was hard enough to pound nails with. After soaking alternately in lye and milk. It softened up considerably. In our family one had two choices, cream sauce or butter salt and pepper. I had to take some--but some meant the smallest divisible piece without using a knife or fork to cut...about the size of a quarter. Put lots of butter, salt, and pepper on it, and it tasted just like butter, salt, and pepper, but it didn't smell quite that good. (Sorry Grandma, if you're reading this from heaven).
February 21, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
A wonderful and inciteful 'dialogue'.
It would be interesting if more of us 'remembered' the way it truly was - our experiences, societal 'norms', et al. and shared them here.
Thanks for this. Rec'd.
February 21, 2009 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is really fun to meet you, Amike. Great post.
No offense but lutefisk is not my cup of fish.
I am a pickled herring kind of guy.
February 21, 2009 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Me, too, actually, with rye crisp.
February 21, 2009 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pickled herring is good. Especially with crackers.
So, what have we learned? Pickling is preferable to salting, drying and rehydrating. We may all be needing that knowledge soon....
February 21, 2009 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, Bwak! I couldn't just leave this comment lie unadorned.
In the case of herring versus lutefisk, what we have learned is that pickling is preferable to "lying."
I leave it to you to determine just how pickled a good neo-con has to be before they quit telling tall tales about foreign affairs and such.
"Belly up to the bar, boys!"
February 22, 2009 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
GUFFAW That was a good'n.
February 22, 2009 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
=D
February 22, 2009 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's cowardice, and there's reticence. One is based on wanting to do the right thing while not quite knowing what it might be in every situation, the other is absolute unwillingness to even try to do the right thing.
And garlic is your friend. At least, it's my friend.
And I believe it was Bill Bradley who tried to move things forward back in the 2000 campaign by pointing out that at some point we will have to have a lot of conversations among many groups and individuals, and we will have to do this in honesty and without recriminations - from all sides. Let's hope it happens, sooner rather than later.
February 21, 2009 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are Swedish, that is about as white as one can get. You are highly educated, which separates you from many of the experiences of most of those who aren't as white. You were a high school basketball player, which one can almost assume, means you were well accepted among your peers. You are an accomplished singer, so you are talented and along with talent comes more acceptance and more quality of life. In short, you seem to have lived a story book 67 years.
I understand your point - we need to get to know one another. If you really want people to know you, though, show us your warts. If you really want to know black people, don't be so perfect. They won't believe that.
In contrast with you, I have had serious black friends. I fought with them in Vietnam. I have worked along side them at hard labor. I have eaten at their houses, and I have eaten the other half of a hamburger with my black friend. And, we didn't use a knife or tear it in half. I have drank from the same canteen. Slept at their house? I have slept in the same bed.
Black people will be your friend, if you mean it. If you aren't adding another medal to your accomplishments.
February 22, 2009 6:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the comment. It comes pretty close to what I meant to say. I would add to this the observation that my principal point was physical isolation. My ghetto may have been Swede, but it was a ghetto nonetheless. I have had a storybook life, which is not to say all of it has been easy. But certainly easy enough so I've felt no wish to complain about it. Parts of my life might be considered "warts" by some people--I'm gay. I don't think of that as a wart...just a fact. I'd rather be gay and me than not gay and not me. I played basketball because I was tall not beause I was good. When I got to college I quickly discovered how not good I was. But I had a good time.
I hope this didn't come across as a colossal brag. I certainly had no intention of it having that effect. I don't wear a "Mr. Perfect" sign on my back. And you'll just have to trust me that I don't consider friends of any color medals hanging around my neck.
February 22, 2009 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very interesting, amike.
February 22, 2009 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mike,
Our "national conversation" on race is so superficial and idiotic that it's difficult to bear. Nobody hears about the dialogue of individuals because it is personal and below the radar screen of the elite who are like blind people who need audio confirmation of what is happening around them but there is none on this subject that they can detect. The individual efforts that are happening is not enough, but it is a growing phenomenon that will make a difference in the long run.
Relying on the elite to conduct a national dialogue on race is a losing proposition. The corporate media behaves like elementary school children whenever this topic comes up and encourages the most shallow, base and divisive sorts of conversations. The way the media handles the subject of race is so dishonorably shameful and simplistic it makes me sick.
The results of the last election demonstrate better than any other argument that it is our elites who are cowardly on race (especially the media elite but encompassing all the elite class) and that once again as in their embarrasingly idiotioc behavior regarding "Monicagate", their acceptance and whitewashing of the theft of the election in 2000, their utter, willful and complete collaboration in lying the nation to war in Iraq, their subsequent cheerleading for the criminal Bush administration in it's multiple crimes and violations of the law and constitution, and in their unfettered greed and irresponsibility that is the direct and easily discernible cause for the destruction of our economy. The larger issue that we see all around us is not race. Race which is important, is merely the distraction of the moment.
The real and central issue of our moment in history is the complete and total failure of the elite classes of this nation in every way and on every front. Via their spectacular failures all around they have lost all credibility in every area whether economic, social, political, military. You name it and they have failed the nation miserably. Change was the slogan for last fall's election but it was the wrong word. Revolution needs to be the theme now and on the lips of every citizen. Revolution is often assumed to be violent but the radical reordering of the power and income distribution in this society which is long overdue needn't be violent. By seizing this moment in history and asserting the soveriegnty of the people to demand that reordering and restructuring of power and wealth we can more effectivley and adequately address every problem before us including the legacy and issues involved in race in America.
February 22, 2009 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "dialogue" between AMike and FarOff above is indicative of both the possibilities and perils of the "Great National Conversation on Race" that is so long overdue.
The possibility is that here we have two white people talking about their experiences with black people. AMike confesses his contacts have been limited and tempered by -- well, fear of a sorts (afraid to worship in the same place) -- to get too close. And surprise at what he sees as unexpected kindnesses (the birthday cupcakes). The cupcakes were nothing short of what anyone might do for anyone else on their birthday. (Black folks celebrate birthdays with cupcakes, too. LOL!) For a flash, I was reminded of Bill O'Reilly's "surprise" that diners at the famed Sylvia's restaurant in NYC used knives and forks to eat their food (and I presume not stab one another.)
The peril comes from FarOff's well-meaning declaration that black people will be your friend if you are "genuine" and "mean it." He says, look at me, I've eaten with them, slept in the same bed with them and lived to tell about it. But from where I sit, that sounds a little condescending, as if to suggest that like some animal in a zoo, you can get close, you can pet it, but you can't "show fear" or you'll get bitten. (And I'm sure for many of you that is an apt analogy.)
I appreciate what both are trying to say. The new AG, however, is trying to take us somewhere deeper and darker. Why is it that 11 a.m. on Sunday morning remains, as Martin Luther King, Jr. famously said, the most segregated hour in America? Although many mega-churches have integrated congregations, there is still a decided mis-match who worships with whom. Why is it that the forced integration of workplaces and schools of the 60s and 70s is slipping backward to re-segregation -- even if it is self-imposed? Why is it that the previous administration and the current Supreme Court's conservative majority have done everything in their power to undo the progress made voluntarily by communities like Louisville, KY and Seattle, WA to insure their schools are diverse?
Our cowardice manifests itself in how we talk about race in the media, as AMike alluded. The "problem" of race relations in this country is not seen as a problem of the majority culture, but reaction to the minorities who insist on talking about it all the time. You will never see a panel convened where all white people speak candidly of their culture's failures and biases with regard to black America. You will not see any media interview a Tim Wise extensively. Instead, you have the concocted debate of Prof. Dyson and Joe Klein or Govs. Deval Patrick and Haley Barbour -- where Barbour says, "let's not talk about race. Let's just talk about the 'content of one's character,'" without realizing that the very character than needs to be talked about is one that avoids talking about the racial problems facing this country. That kind of cowardice.
Eric Holder's comments were meant to be provocative. And interesting that they came concurrent with the NY Post's "non-racist" racist cartoon and their non-apology apology.
We do need a discussion, a dialogue. It will not be comfortable or easy. It will not be completed over a sensitivity-training weekend. It will expose the cowardice in all of us. But we will be better for it in the end.
February 22, 2009 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Jade. Let me try to clarify one thing I said, relative to worshipping with blacks in black churches. I lived in Chicago from 1959 to 1963. My junior and senior years were very tense as issues of open housing came to a head. http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/931.html I was never afraid of worshiping in a black church: I was afraid of walking to a black church. In the nineties I had the opportunity to re-visit the near south side, and worshiped in Pilgrim Baptist Church. I never felt less than welcomed. The church where I sing in Providence Rhode Island is thoroughly integrated now, and it is an inner city mainline denominational church,not a megachurch. What its status was in the 1960s, I don't know. The east coast was a foreign country back then. :-)
February 22, 2009 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I was never afraid of worshiping in a black church: I was afraid of walking to a black church."
Let me ask you, do you think the black children across this country who integrated all-white schools were afraid to sit in the schools or walk to the schools?
Do you think they were intimidated by the prospect of reading, writing and arithmetic or needing a phalanx of National Guardsmen and US Marshals to see to it that they got inside the school safely?
Do you think they were more annoyed by the spitball that hit them in the back of the head in the classroom, or the actually spit from the foaming mouths of the parents of their erstwhile classmates as the parents shouted epithets at them and threatened to lynch them and their brothers and sisters?
Let me answer from firsthand experience: We couldn't afford to be afraid. We couldn't let fear stand in our way.
February 22, 2009 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is why I accept the charge of coward. I'm not proud of the way I reacted to my fear.
February 23, 2009 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink