<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>AmericanDad&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198</id>
   <updated>2010-08-29T05:50:37Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Muslims in America: The shocking truth!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/muslims-in-america-the-shockin.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.349498</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-29T05:45:45Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-29T05:50:37Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Paul Revere is alive! &nbsp;He rides the airwaves, newsprint and Internet this time, awakening us to a new danger invading our homeland, a new enemy coming to destroy our nation: &nbsp;Muslims! &nbsp;The trouble is, our modern would-be midnight riders are...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49942" label="Cordoba" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="123" label="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49114" label="mosque" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6957" label="Muslim" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20375" label="Newt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span>Paul Revere is alive! &nbsp;He rides the airwaves, newsprint and Internet this time, awakening us to a new danger invading our homeland, a new enemy coming to destroy our nation: &nbsp;Muslims! &nbsp;The trouble is, our modern would-be midnight riders are shamefully, miserably, ridiculously wrong.</span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/15/tennessee.mosque.controversy/">They're coming to conquer us!</a></span><span><blockquote><p>"In Islam, a mosque means 'We have conquered this country,'" one man told CNN affiliate WTVF. "And where are they? They're in the center of Tennessee. They're going to say, 'We have conquered Tennessee.'"</p></blockquote><p>Never mind: "Islam" is a religion, not a language. &nbsp;Never mind: &nbsp;In Arabic, the language in which the Koran was written, "mosque" means "a place of prostration" (a submissive position before God, usually for prayer),&nbsp;<span>not&nbsp;</span>"we have conquered this country."</p><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100808/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_opposition">They're coming to conquer us!</a></p><blockquote><p>In the Nashville suburb of Murfreesboro, opponents of a new Islamic center say they believe the mosque will be more than a place of prayer. They are afraid the 15-acre site that was once farmland will be turned into a terrorist training ground for Muslim militants bent on overthrowing the U.S. government.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100808/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_opposition">They're coming but -- uh.... they're really... slow?</a></p><blockquote><p>"The Islamic center has been here since the early '80s, 12 years in this location. There's nothing different now except it's going to be a little bigger."</p></blockquote><p>Oh. Never mind.</p><p><a href="http://cbs11tv.com/watercooler/Franklin.Graham.Islam.2.265296.html">They're coming and they're evil and wicked and attacking us!</a></p><blockquote><p>"...Islam has attacked us. The God of Islam is not the same God. He's not the son of God of the Christian or Judeo-Christian faith. It's a different God, and I believe it is a very evil and wicked religion."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2007/october/20071005143134esnamfuak0.9335138.html">Never mind:&nbsp;</a>In 2007, President Bush said Islam is a great religion that preaches peace and prays to the same God of other faiths.</p><blockquote><p>Ahead of hosting an iftar celebration at the White House, President Bush said the Islamic religion "is a great religion that preaches peace," and that Americans are free "to worship any way they see fit...."&nbsp;stating his own belief that the global community, regardless of individual faiths, "prays to the same God."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.thevoicemagazine.com/Underground_Jihad_America_pt1.html">They're coming with Nukes!</a></p><blockquote><p>...the U.S. is peppered with compounds at which Islam fundamentalists are training terrorists for jihad. ...Islamic extremists are hoarding nuclear materials with plans to simultaneously attack at least seven major American cities in what would result in a stateside Hiroshima.</p><p>...Islamic terrorist groups have at least 500 underground bunkers and caches of weapons. I thought there were only 14 jihad training compounds throughout the States. Now I know there are more than 40.... There could be as many as 200...</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.thevoicemagazine.com/Underground_Jihad_America_pt1.html">They're coming and they're scary black guys with big muscles and scary costumes!</a></p><blockquote><p>...&nbsp;robust and muscular African-Americans in full Islamic garb...</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/04/greatest-problems-facing-america-for.html">They're coming and they're the #1 problem facing America!</a></p><blockquote><p>Americans need to seriously consider how Islam and its supremacy dogmatic philosophy is to be handled least we revert into 7th Century Old World barbarism. A good first step would be to think about Islam as a political and social system first and foremost, that is exactly opposite from our own social and political values, and one whose advance needs to be stopped. Considering the birth-rate of American infidels, to give total freedom of Islam to grow here in America is the same as generating our own death-wish, demise, and all the values we hold dear.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://cbs11tv.com/watercooler/Franklin.Graham.Islam.2.265296.html">They're coming and they've got the Devil on their side!</a></p><blockquote><p>"These people are crazed fanatics, and I want to say it now: I believe it's motivated by demonic power. It is satanic and it's time we recognize what we're dealing with. &nbsp;The goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination"</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/08/rauf_sharia_puppet.html">They're coming and the president and his buddies are helping them destroy America!</a></p><blockquote><p>We can see, in the concrete, the left's coalition with the Islamic Supremacists and how it is undermining American sovereignty and our national self interest -- as is meticulously documented in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America. It's hard for Americans to understand how to fight a shadowy enemy you can't see.</p><p>...&nbsp;a Machiavellian backroom power grab and the takedown of American sovereignty ....</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://shootingmessengers.blogspot.com/2006/11/islam-hateful-frightening-religion.html">They're coming to kill us!</a></p><blockquote><p>...there need be a line drawn somewhere in kissing moslem ass.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>The line is here.</p><p>They wish to kill us, all of us. Or enslave or convert.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100808/ap_on_re_us/us_mosque_opposition">They're coming and they're really violent!</a></p><blockquote><p>Two years ago, several men broke into the Islamic Center of Columbia, about 30 miles southwest of Murfreesboro, and torched it with molotov cocktails, stealing a stereo system and painting swastikas and "White Power" on the front of the building.</p></blockquote><p>Oh... wait. &nbsp;That was somebody else. &nbsp;<span>(</span><i>ahem)</i><span>&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;Never mind.</p><p><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/daily_shows_aasif_mandvi_peaceful_muslims_in_tn_ru.php?ref=fpblg">They're coming and they're really scary people!</a></p><blockquote><p>Islam is a political system of global domination... 30%... ARE terrorists.... There's 35 training camps across the United States of America.... &nbsp;We know we've got a huge terrorist network here in Tennessee. &nbsp;The Nashville Islamic Center appears to be the mother ship...</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20080414/rod-parsley-on-islam/index.html">They're coming and it's a holy war!</a></p><blockquote><p>Parsley says there is a war and he wants bigger war, as America can only "fulfill its divine purpose" by seeing to it that Islam, "this false religion, is destroyed." Though he spells out no specific strategy, he writes things like, "We find now we have no choice. The time has come" to destroy "this anti-Christ religion," inspired by demons who spoke to Allah.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/a/m/americandad/2010/08/the-great-churchless-lie-about.php#comment-4063996">They're coming and we'd better stop them!</a></p><blockquote><p>...be afraid, be very afraid and maybe we all can stop the American Jihad before another attack happens from the practitioners of the 'Religion of Peace'.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://rawstory.com/2009/11/robertson-islam-not-religion/">They're coming and they're self-contradictory (both commie&nbsp;<span>and</span>&nbsp;fascist?)!</a></p><blockquote><p>"If we don't stop covering up what Islam is ... Islam is a violent -- I was going to say religion, but it's not a religion, it's a political system, it's a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world and world domination," Robertson said. "You're dealing with not a religion, you're dealing with a political system, and I think we should treat it as such, and treat its adherents as such as we would members of the communist party, members of some fascist group."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/a/m/americandad/2010/08/the-great-churchless-lie-about.php#comment-4065462">They're coming and they've declared war on us!</a></p><blockquote><p>You have join forces with the other side...again and that side is bent on destroying our republican form of government replacing it with a theocracy and your helping the Jihadists accomplish their goals. That once again makes you one seditious progressive bastard without a thought of true patriotic duty.</p><p>You fail to see that Islam establishes Sharia Law as it's judicial system which establishes Islam as the official state religion, that my seditious progressive foe goes against our First Amendment establishment clause and that makes Islam unconstitutional....</p><p>Your failure to recognize this makes you worse than an 'idiot', it makes you an Islamic Appeaser and traitor since Islam has declared WAR on the U.S. and other non-submitting nations....</p></blockquote><p>Oh dear me, such terrible trouble we're in! &nbsp;The Others are coming! &nbsp;The Others are coming! &nbsp;The strange, foreign anti-you-and-me Others are coming! &nbsp;Or not.</p><p>Here are a few inconvenient facts that destroy this know-nothing narrative:</p><p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/estevanico"><span>Fact:</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span>Muslims "invaded" what is now the USA about 250 years before there was a USA.</p><p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/estevanico"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a><span></span>The first of three "Americans" to cross the continent in the early 1500s was a Muslim.</p><p><a href="http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/twenty/tkeyinfo/islam.htm"><span>Fact:</span></a>&nbsp;American Muslim history is longer than most might think, extending back to the day that the first slave ship landed on Virginia's coast in 1619.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The very&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco_-_United_States_relations">first country to recognize the newly formed USA as a sovereign nation</a>&nbsp;was an Islamic nation.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moroccan-American_Treaty_of_Friendship">&nbsp;longest unbroken treaty relationship in U.S. history</a>&nbsp;-- 223 years -- is with an Islamic nation.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;The<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangier_American_Legation_Museum">&nbsp;oldest U.S. diplomatic property</a>&nbsp;is in an Islamic nation.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangier_American_Legation_Museum">only building on foreign soil that is now a US National Historic L</a>andmark is in an Islamic nation.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estevanico"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a>At least two states -- Arizona and New Mexico -- owe their beginnings to a Muslim.</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/African-Muslims-Antebellum-America-Transatlantic/dp/0415912709"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a><span></span>Thousands of&nbsp;Muslims were among the slaves in the American colonies, one of whom was&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_Smith">Broteer&nbsp;</a>(renamed Venture by his owner) who escaped with an Irish indentured servant named Heddy, but was recaptured when he turned Heddy in for stealing food (the theft violated Venture's moral standards). &nbsp;The Muslim colonial slave best known to modern Americans is&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archives/1998/documents/00521376.htm">Kunta Kinte</a>. He fought to hold on to his Islamic heritage, scratching Arabic phrases in the dirt and praying daily.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>Muslims fought in the American Revolutionary War, rising to the ranks of officers and gaining notice for their heroic participation. &nbsp;They also fought in every American war since, from the War of 1812 to the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. &nbsp;In fact, you'll find the graves of fallen Muslim soldiers and Muslim veterans in military cemeteries across the country.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1776, John Adams published "Thoughts on Government," in which he praises the Islamic prophet Mahomet (Mohammed) as a "sober inquirer after truth."</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1788, in the North Carolina ratifying convention, those opposed the new US Constitution stated their fear that some day Catholics or Muslims might be elected president was a reason for their anti-Constitution position.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1785, George Washington stated a willingness to hire "Mahometans," as well as people of any nation or religion, to work on his private estate at Mount Vernon if they were "good workmen."</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1796, President John Adams signed a treaty declaring the United States had no "character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen"</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In his autobiography, published in 1791, Benjamin Franklin stated that he "did not disapprove" of a meeting place in Pennsylvania that was designed to accommodate preachers of all religions. Franklin wrote that "even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service."</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In his autobiography, Thomas Jefferson wrote:</p><blockquote><p>"[When] the [Virginia] bill for establishing religious freedom... was finally passed,... a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word 'Jesus Christ,' so that it should read 'a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.' The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and&nbsp;<span>Mahometan</span>&nbsp;the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination." (emphasis added)</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>While president, Jefferson participated in an<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iftar">&nbsp;iftar</a>&nbsp;with the Muslim ambassador of Tunisia in 1809.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In his autobiography, Jefferson also wrote:</p><blockquote><p>Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word 'Jesus Christ,' so that it should read 'a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.' The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and&nbsp;<b>Mahometan</b>, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination." (emphasis added)</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The new United States signed peace treaties with Algeria in 1795, Tripoli in 1796, Tunis in 1797, and Muscat (Oman) in 1833 -- all Islamic nations.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The Treaty of Tripole of 1797 reads, part:</p><blockquote><p>Article 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1786, &nbsp;Jefferson's long and bitterly debated statute for religious freedom finally passed the Virginia legislature. In Jefferson's words, there was now "freedom for the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mohammedan, the Hindu and infidel of every denomination." The bill guaranteed, in Jefferson's own words, "that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place or ministry whatsoever." It guaranteed, too, that no one should suffer in any way for his "religious opinions or belief." When the First Amendment to the Constitution went into effect in 1791, Jefferson's principle of separation of church and state became part of the supreme law of the land.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1807, Yarrow Mamout, a Muslim slave, was set free in Washington DC, and later became one of the first shareholders of the second chartered bank in America, the Columbia Bank.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1832, the Village of Mahomet, Ill., was planned. Originally named Middletown, it became Mahomet during the 1840s.</p><p><span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oman_-_United_States_relations">Fact:&nbsp;</a></span>In 1833, the US entered a treaty of friendship with what is now Oman -- a relationship that has continued to today.</p><p><span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elkader,_Iowa">Fact:&nbsp;</a></span>1846 Elkader, Iowa, at the time a village in the Missouri territory was named after the Emir of Algeria Abd el-Kader.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In the 1850s, Mahomet, Texas, was founded</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1856, &nbsp;the United States cavalry hired a Muslim, Hajji Ali, to experiment with raising camels in Arizona. &nbsp;He became a local folk hero in Quartzsite, Ariz., where he died in 1903. He was known as "Hi Jolly", his tombstone is a stone built pyramid with a camel on top of it.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In&nbsp;1861, Muhammad Ali ibn Said arrived in Detroit where taught school before, in 1863, he enlisted in the 55th Massachusetts colored regiment and became a Civil War hero.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In, 1875, a wave of Muslim immigrants arrived, mainly from Syria, Lebanon, and Palestine.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;in 1880, in what appears to be a forefather of the Falwell-Robertson-Graham-Parsley-Etc. Gang, a minister named O.C. McCulloch wrote, "The Tribe of Ishmael: A Study in Social Degradation in favor of castrating the men and separating the children and women." &nbsp;(Yes, you read that correctly -- a Christian American proposes castrating Muslim men and separating Muslim mothers and their children.)</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1889, &nbsp;Edward W. Blyden, noted scholar and social activist, traveled throughout the eastern and southern states, proclaiming Islam.</p><p><span>Fact</span>: &nbsp;In 1893, another wave of Muslim immigrants arrive, this time from the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, etc.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1897-98 a monthly magazine called the "Ishmaelite" was published by and for Muslims living in Cincinnati.</p><p><span>Fact</span>: &nbsp;Between 1899 and 1914, another wave --more than 86,000 -- of Muslims arrived from Syria.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1907, the first compulsory sterilization law in the world, a draconian eugenics law, was enacted in Indiana against Muslims. &nbsp;(Yes, you read that correctly, too -- a law passed to force Muslims to be sterilized.)</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1913, &nbsp;the Moorish Science Temple of America (MSTA) was established in Newark, NJ.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1915, &nbsp;Muslims built a mosque in Maine and established an Islamic association.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1919, Muslims built a mosque in Connecticut.</p><p><span>Fact</span>: &nbsp;In 1920, the Red Crescent, a Muslim charity modeled after the International Red Cross, was established in Detroit.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1926, the Universal Islamic Society was established in Detroit.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1926, &nbsp;Muslims built a mosque in Brooklyn, which is still in use.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1928, the Islamic Propagation Center of America was founded in Brooklyn.</p><p><span>Fact</span>: &nbsp; In 1930, &nbsp;Muslims established a mosque in Pittsburg. The organization that will become the Nation of Islam was begun.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1935, a mosque was built in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and it is still in use today. &nbsp;Worshippers there had used a rented building for 15 years prior.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1955, the State Street mosque in New York City was established -- it is still in use today.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1962, the newspaper "Muhammad Speaks" was begun. &nbsp;It grew to be the largest minority weekly publication in the US, and at its peak reached more than 800,000 readers. &nbsp;Cassius Clay converted to Islam and took the name Muhammad Ali. &nbsp;Korean War veteran Clarence Jowars founded Allah's Nation of the Five Percenters in Harlem.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1965,&nbsp;U.S. laws changed to allow Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Arabs from the professional classes (i.e., doctors and engineers) to immigrate.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1990,&nbsp;Dr. Shirin Tahir-Kheli became the first Muslim ambassador to the United Nations for the US.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1991,&nbsp;Charles Bilal of Kountze, Texas, became the first Muslim mayor of a US city.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1996, Denver International Airport became the first airport in the US to open a mosque.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>The White House has held an annual Eid celebration, Eid al-Fitr, since 1996.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 1997, the Muslim symbol of a crescent moon and a star is displayed for the first time along with the national Christmas tree and the Jewish menorah on White House grounds.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In 1998, a United Nations report on "Civil and Political Rights, including Freedom of Expression" in the US sharply criticised the attitude of the American media, noting "very harmful activity by the media in general and the popular press in particular, which consists in putting out a distorted and indeed hate-filled message treating Muslims as extremists and terrorists", adding that "efforts to combat the ignorance and intolerance purveyed by the media, above all through preventive measures in the field of education, should be given priority."</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;The Pentagon has been hosting a Ramadan meal for more than 20 years.</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;In 2001, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and the backlash of violence against Muslim Americans, recognized the Islamic faith "as one of the great religions of the world."</p><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;<a href="http://islam.about.com/blvictims.htm">Muslim Americans died in the towers on 9/11,</a></p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>Muslim Americans rushed to the site as first responders to try and help, including&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Salman_Hamdani">a paramedic/ambulance driver/police cadet</a>&nbsp;who died heroically trying to rescue victims at the Twin Towers.</p><p><a href="As Lawrence Wright"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a>FBI agent Ali Soufan came within inches of unraveling the 9/11 plot, failing largely due to the CIA's failure to share its data hoard.</p><p><a href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44689"><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;</a>Between 10,000 and 20,000 American Muslims wear the uniforms of the American military and fight and die for this country.</p><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>There are more than 1,200 mosques in the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.america.gov/st/diversity-english/2008/December/20081222090246jmnamdeirf0.4547083.html"><span>Fact</span></a><span>:&nbsp;</span>Although&nbsp;most Americans identify Islam primarily with Arabs, two thirds of Arab Americans are Christian.</p><p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116260/Muslim-Americans-Exemplify-Diversity-Potential.aspx"><span>Fact:</span></a><span>&nbsp;</span>Muslim Americans are the most racially diverse religious group surveyed in the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/125312/Religious-Prejudice-Stronger-Against-Muslims.aspx"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a>Muslim Americans face more prejudice in US than do people of other religions.</p><blockquote><p>More than 4 in 10 Americans (43%) admit to feeling at least "a little" prejudice toward Muslims -- more than twice the number who say the same about Christians (18%), Jews (15%) and Buddhists (14%).</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116260/Muslim-Americans-Exemplify-Diversity-Potential.aspx"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a>Muslim Americans tend to be political centrists.</p><blockquote><p>39% of young Muslim Americans describe their views as moderate, 28% say they are either liberal or very liberal, while 20% consider themselves politically conservative or very conservative.</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;Barack Obama is a Christian, not a Muslim, but if he were of the latter faith, more than half of all Americans would have no idea what that affiliation meant beyond stereotypes, a new study found. &nbsp;Like nearly all social groups,<a href="http://www.livescience.com/culture/081030-muslim-americans.html">Muslim Americans are a diverse group</a>,&nbsp;both politically and socially.</p><blockquote><p>Overall, Muslim Americans are, well, American. They have similar levels of career and educational attainment as the general American public; their political beliefs are just as varied as the general public; and their typical level of religious devotion is on par with that of many other religious groups, the research shows.</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span>In the US, there are more than 500 names of places, villages, streets, towns, cities, lakes, rivers, etc., derived from words or places in Muslim nations.</p><p><a href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44689"><span>Fact:&nbsp;</span></a>Like the Bible, the Koran is open to interpretation, up to a point, and does not condone murder.</p><blockquote><p>"Those terrorists (of 9/11) must be reading a completely different Koran than the rest of us," said Marine Corps Capt. Aisha Bakkar-Poe.... She said her co-workers have been asking her about Islam since the attacks in New York and Washington. "The question I get most often is, 'Who is this Allah guy,'" she said. "And how could these fanatics make these attacks.</p><p>"I try to answer their questions and explain that Islam does not believe in killing innocent men, women and children."</p><p>Army Capt. Arneshuia Balial, a nurse instructor at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and a Muslim, said the terrorists claiming to act in the name of Islam was "like a knife through my heart -- that people would practice Al-Islam, but do deeds like what they've done. It's not true faith. Some people twist religion to the way they think."</p></blockquote><p><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;Cordoba House, named for the city in Spanish Andalucia where Muslims, Jews and Christians once co-existed for centuries in an extraordinary flourishing of culture and science.</p><p><a href="http://www.newt.org/newt-direct/newt-building-mosque-political-statement-'shocking-arrogance'"><span>Fact:</span>&nbsp;Newt Gingrich is lying</a>&nbsp;about the meaning of Cordoba, Spain, the building of a mosque and of the NY Cordoba House:</p><blockquote><p>It refers to Cordoba, Spain - the capital of Muslim conquerors who symbolized their victory over the Christian Spaniards by transforming a church there into the world's third-largest mosque complex. [...I]n fact, every Islamist in the world recognizes Cordoba as a symbol of Islamic conquest. &nbsp;It is a sign of their contempt for Americans and their confidence in our historic ignorance that they would deliberately insult us this way.</p></blockquote><p>Newt's been a Catholic for just a little more than a year, now, but I would have expected some priest might already have introduced him to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/">The Catholic Encyclopedia</a>. &nbsp;Here's what the church's encyclopedia (in the public domain and searchable&nbsp;<a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04359b.htm">online</a>) says about Cordoba:</p><blockquote><p>In 786 the Arab caliph, Abd-er Rahman I, began the construction of the great mosque of Cordova, now the cathedral, and compelled many Christians to take part in the preparation of the site and foundations. Though they suffered many vexations,<b>&nbsp;the Christians continued to enjoy freedom of worship, and this tolerant attitude of the ameers seduced not a few Christians from their original allegiance. Both Christians and Arabs co-operated at this time to make Cordova a flourishing city, the elegant refinement of which was unequalled in Europe</b><span>.&nbsp;</span>(emphasis added)</p></blockquote><p>And this about the rulers who expanded the mosque there:</p><blockquote><p>In 962 Abd-er Rahman III was succeeded by his son Al-Hakim.&nbsp;<span>Owing to the peace which the Christians of Cordova then enjoyed [...] the citizens of Cordova, Arabs, Christians, and Jews, enjoyed so high a degree of literary culture that the city was known as the New Athens. From all quarters came students eager to drink at its founts of knowledge.&nbsp;</span>Among the men afterwards famous who studied at Cordova were the scholarly monk Gerbert, destined to sit on the Chair of Peter as Sylvester II (999-1003), the Jewish rabbis Moses and Maimonides†, and the famous Spanish-Arabian commentator on Aristotle, Averroes. (emphasis added)</p></blockquote><p>Contrary to Newt's fib, to be legitimate in Muslim eyes during the time when the Great Mosque was being expanded, it was important that rulers stress a peaceful succession of Islam from the other religions in the area. &nbsp;A caliph was expected to have arrived at harmony with the Christians and Jews under his authority. &nbsp;Rather than Newt's asserted "(symbol of) their victory," the mosque has been held up by Muslim historians a symbol of peaceful coexistence with Christians.</p><p>I'm thinking Newt owes a "hail Mary" or two, but I'm hoping that his penance will be a vow silence.</p><p>"Cordoba House," then, is the perfect symbolic name for a community center created by Muslims in one of the largest and most famous cities, known for its large Jewish population, in a Christian-majority nation. &nbsp;Newt wants us to believe that "Cordoba" is a dog whistle word to tell Muslims to secretly and smugly snicker at their "conquest." &nbsp;As noted, Newt's own church says newt is lying. &nbsp;Instead, the name is obviously a reference to -- perhaps an invocation of -- the spirit of a place and time in which the Big Three Abrahamic religions lived and studied together in peace, elegance and splendor.</p><p>There is no escaping the fact that, today,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/the-war-against-fundament_b_5898.html">Islamic extremism is a very real problem</a>&nbsp;(as is a number of forms of extremism, religious and otherwise). But there is also no escaping that there are more than a billion Muslims who are&nbsp;<span><span>not</span></span>&nbsp;part of that problem, a billion Muslims who are good people trying to live, love, provide for their families and live in peace. &nbsp;And there is no escaping that millions of Muslims have always been part of America, have helped build America, and have sacrificed to defend America. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/i-am-the-walrus-the-beatles/b580001aa2e3879de43cb580001aa2e3879de43c-170078045040?q=I%20Am%20He%20As%20You%20Are%20He%20As%20You%20Are%20Me%20and%20We%20Are%20All%20Together&amp;FORM=VIRE6">There is no escaping that</a>&nbsp;"<span>I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."</span></p><p>How deep, how painful, is our shame -- whether born of ignorance of history or of knowing bigotry -- that so many Americans would stand in opposition to such a symbol. &nbsp;How deep, how painful, is our shame -- whether born of ignorance of our own history or of knowing bigotry -- that so many Americans would hold and express such prejudice against our our fellow Americans, our fellow patriots. &nbsp;What, then, shall be our penance?</p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>News of the bad, the worse and the ugly</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/news-of-the-bad-the-worse-and.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.348864</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-24T02:25:38Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-24T02:32:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Funny, nobody&apos;s offered me a dime&quot;It&apos;s standard operating procedure&quot; to pay bloggers for favorable coverage, says one Republican campaign operative. A GOP blogger-for-hire estimates that &quot;at least half the bloggers that are out there&quot; on the Republican side &quot;are getting...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49318" label="Angle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="18605" label="Armey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6817" label="Bachmann" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5940" label="bigotry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49942" label="Cordoba" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6484" label="Fox" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6164" label="hate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="123" label="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11872" label="Johnson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50088" label="Laura" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9562" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6957" label="Muslim" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46434" label="Paul" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5388" label="Republican" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49322" label="Ryan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="516" label="terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16409" label="Wisconsin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/23/true-stories-of-bloggers-who-secretly-feed-on-partisan-cash/">Funny, nobody's offered me a dime</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"It's standard operating procedure" to pay bloggers for favorable coverage, says one Republican campaign operative. A GOP blogger-for-hire estimates that "at least half the bloggers that are out there" on the Republican side "are getting remuneration in some way beyond ad sales."</p><p>In California, where former eBay executive Meg Whitman beat businessman Steve Poizner in a bitterly fought primary battle in the campaign for governor, it sometimes seemed as if there was a bidding war for bloggers.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/23/ron-paul-ny-mosque/">Every so often, Daddy Paul gets it right</a></span>&nbsp;-- this time calling out his fellow GOPers for their hypocrisy, cowardice,&nbsp;<span>hate and Islamaphobia</span></p><blockquote><p>Many fellow conservatives say they understand the property rights and 1st Amendment issues and don't want a legal ban on building the mosque. They just want everybody to be "sensitive" and force, through public pressure, cancellation of the mosque construction.</p><p>This sentiment seems to confirm that Islam itself is to be made the issue, and radical religious Islamic views were the only reasons for 9/11. If it became known that 9/11 resulted in part from a desire to retaliate against what many Muslims saw as American aggression and occupation, the need to demonize Islam would be difficult if not impossible....</p><p>It is repeatedly said that 64% of the people, after listening to the political demagogues, don't want the mosque to be built. What would we do if 75% of the people insist that no more Catholic churches be built in New York City? The point being is that majorities can become oppressors of minority rights as well as individual dictators. Statistics of support is irrelevant when it comes to the purpose of government in a free society--protecting liberty. [...]</p><p>This is all about hate and Islamaphobia.</p></blockquote></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/23/ground-zero-hate/">"All y'all dumb motherf*ckers don't even know my opinion on sh*t."</a></span>&nbsp;A bit of that good ol' hate and bigotry that Paul (and a lot of us) is/are talking about. &nbsp;A black guy wearing a Puerto Rican flag charm on a necklace and an Under Armor skullcap gets harassed and nearly attacked by a crowd of white racists shouting about Cordoba House, because they think he looks kinda muslimish (yup, Muslim is the new n*gger; and what does this tell us about the new Arizona law?).</p><p>I tip my hat to the little old guy in the glasses who tried to shield the victim. &nbsp;That guys has real courage.</p><p>Gotta hand it to the protestors, too -- they were absolutely right in shouting "No mosque here!" because it's not a mosque and it's not going to be where they were. &nbsp;Most amusing moment comes about the 2 minute mark when someone says, "They're trying to make us look like racists." &nbsp;Nope. &nbsp;You're doing fine all by yourself. &nbsp;No help from us needed.</p><p>I try so very hard to keep my violent side quiet (it's a spiritual thing for me), but damn there's part of me that would love to have gone nose-to-nose with the blue-hat guy and Lurch. So easy for them to be "bravely" aggressive when they're twice the size of their target and surrounded by dozens of backers. There's more --&nbsp;<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iNLTahM5QJw8Ts0SpTgWLjXwN7gAD9HOPCJ80">wingnuts keepin' it classy</a></p><blockquote><p>A mannequin wearing a keffiyeh, a traditional Arab headdress, was mounted on one of two mock missiles that were part of an anti-mosque installation. One missile was inscribed with the words: "Again? Freedom Targeted by Religion"; the other with "Obama: With a middle name Hussein. We understand. Bloomberg: What is your excuse?"</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/kelly/95748769_On_this_ground__zero_tolerance.html?page=all">Of course, it's not the first time Islamaphobes let their hateful ignorance show</a></span></p><blockquote><p>At one point, a portion of the crowd menacingly surrounded two Egyptian men who were speaking Arabic and were thought to be Muslims.</p><p>"Go home," several shouted from the crowd.</p><p>"Get out," others shouted.</p><p>In fact, the two men - Joseph Nassralla and Karam El Masry -- were not Muslims at all. They turned out to be Egyptian Coptic Christians who work for a California-based Christian satellite TV station called "The Way." Both said they had come to protest the mosque.</p><p>"I'm a Christian," Nassralla shouted to the crowd, his eyes bulging and beads of sweat rolling down his face.</p><p>But it was no use. The protesters had become so angry at what they thought were Muslims that New York City police officers had to rush in and pull Nassralla and El Masry to safety.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/22/AR2010082202895_pf.html">The ugliness reaches, of course, far beyond NYC</a>&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.whas11.com/news/local/Northern-Kentucky-protestors-aim-to-stop-construction-of-mosque-in-area-101228659.html">Here, too</a><span>.</span></p><blockquote><p>Protesters in Northern Kentucky are trying to stop the construction of a mosque. Flyers are circulating in Florence, Ky. asking that city government officials intervene.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/08/ground-zero_mosque_1">And here.</a></p><blockquote><p>Moreover, groups of Americans have been protesting the construction of mosques in Bridgeport, Connecticut, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and Temecula, California, none of which are mere blocks from ground zero.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/23/rnc-committee-woman-obama_n_691076.html">RNC Committeewoman Claims Obama Told Muslims He's A Muslim</a></span>&nbsp;<span>Riiiiight.&nbsp;</span>Was that before or after Al Gore's massage? &nbsp;Wanted: &nbsp;Better liars, please. &nbsp;Those we have are too silly.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/a_good_sign_for.html">"Real America" appears to be shrinking.</a></span>&nbsp;Palin can't sell tickets to Palin.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/77138/sharron-angle-versus-the-satanic-football-jersey">GOP suicide watch</a></span>&nbsp;Sharron Angle vs the Satanic Football Jerseys</p><blockquote><p>One of the reasons I've been fascinated with Sharron Angle's Senate campaign is that she is not merely a candidate with extremely radical views, like Rand Paul, she inhabits an ideological grey area where radicalism starts to become indistinguishable with actual mental illness. Here is a column recounting her religious-based objections to a high school football team wearing black jerseys</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/black-conservative-leaders-blast-palin-defending-schlessinger">Black Conservative Leaders Blast Palin for Defending Schlessinger&nbsp;</a></span>And the white conservative leaders...? &nbsp;We're waiting....</p><p><span><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/18/1780685/dr-lauras-ignorance-on-display.html">Asking a conservative pundit for advice on race is like asking an ayatollah for advice on preparing the Christmas ham.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/20/when_will_hannity_return_his_salary_to_saudi_arabian_news_corp_shareholder.php">Jon Stewart connects the dots of Fox to terrorism</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/22/foxnewscom_readers_advocate_shooting_liberals_as_the_only_known_cure.php">More violent rhetoric on the Right&nbsp;</a></span>FoxNews.com Readers Advocate Shooting Liberals As "The Only Known Cure"</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/wi-sen-goper-ron-johnson-construction-workers-should-boycott-cordoba-house.php?ref=fpb">Paul Ryan isn't the only idiot from Wisconsin</a>&nbsp;</span>And this&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025336.php">new idiot makes Ryan look mild.</a></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/federally-funded-religious-freedom-commission-packed-with-anti-mosque-members.php?ref=fpa">Your tax dollars in the service of hate and bigotry</a></span>&nbsp;It Turns Out The Federally Funded Religious Freedom Commission Is Packed With Anti-Cordoba House Members</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025338.php">Because nothing says 'superpower' like when your public schools can't afford toilet paper."</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0822-chapman-column-20100820,0,1147455.column">Such sweet irony!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Ten years ago, Republicans in Congress passed a major law to protect the right of Muslims to establish mosques even where such a building might be unwelcome. Yes, they did. They just may not have thought of it quite that way at the time.</p><p>The law, called the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, was aimed at a common problem often ignored by the courts: local government bodies using zoning authority to prevent religious institutions from moving in or expanding their operations.</p><p>It had the support of such groups as the Christian Legal Society and the Family Research Council. Rep. Charles Canady, R-Fla., said it was aimed at "the well-documented and abusive treatment suffered by religious individuals and organizations in the land use context." Sen. Orrin Hatch, R- Utah, pushed it because, he said, "At the core of religious freedom is the ability for assemblies to gather and worship together."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2010/08/real-rainmen.html">This is a terrific rant&nbsp;</a></span>Yes, it's long and has all the organization of free verse poetry, but -- wow! -- what a thorough rundown of the reckless Radical Right's fetid hypocrisy over the NY Islamic center (with some crazy and some cowardice sprinkled in)</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025334.php">Hypocrisy watch</a></span>: &nbsp;It seems the wingnut's "reverence" for the Constitution comes and goes according to which amendment is under discussion and which way the political wind is blowing. &nbsp;Where have all the strict constructionists and originalists gone?</p><blockquote><p>This hot-and-cold take on the Constitution is surprisingly common within the GOP, particularly among those like Broun who portray themselves as strict Constitutionalists and who frequently accuse Democrats of twisting the document to serve political aims.</p><p>Republicans have proposed at least 42 Constitutional amendments in the current Congress, including one that has gained favor recently to eliminate the automatic grant of citizenship to anyone born in the United States.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/blogsearch?as_epq=http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025333.php">The wingnut drive to "cut checks averaging $3 million each to the richest 120,000 people in the country."</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025325.php">When people advancing these thoughts claim to be "conservative thinkers" it's the Right committing suicide</a></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><blockquote><p><span>A</span>&nbsp;<span>Democratic presidential candidate can present a progressive agenda to the electorate; that candidate can be easily elected, giving that agenda a mandate; and in office, that successful candidate can begin making compromises to move the vision forward through a labyrinthine Congress. But if the Democrat is successful, the result is necessarily at odds with "the purpose and meaning of America."</span></p><p><span>A center-left candidate, in other words, is allowed to run, and even allowed to win. He/she is not, however, allowed to govern. Why? Because it's fundamentally unacceptable -- liberalism is not part of "the normal push and pull of politics."</span></p></blockquote><p></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025324.php">How on earth can anyone take these guys seriously?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>in the official GOP weekly address, the entire message was about deficit reduction, followed by an appeal for hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts that Republicans have no intention of paying for.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/fischer-us-failed-make-iraq-christian-nation-so-our-soldiers-died-nothing">Didn't work in the Crusades either&nbsp;</a></span>The American Family Association's Bryan Fischer now believes the war in Iraq was a failure -- because the United States failed to turn Iraq into a Christian nation. &nbsp;I'm guessing there's a limit to what you can accomplish with either the point of a sword or the barrel of a gun.</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/charles_krauthammers_transparent_dodge.html">So... are the opponents of Cordoba House &nbsp;insisting we should be.... (wait for it)....&nbsp;</a></span><span><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/charles_krauthammers_transparent_dodge.html">empathetic</a></span></span><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/charles_krauthammers_transparent_dodge.html">?&nbsp;</a></span>OMG!</p><blockquote><p>Opponents of the project point out that majorities believe building the project is insensitive to the families of 9/11 victims. No one is arguing that there aren't enormous sensitivities surrounding this. As the events of the past few weeks have shown, the scars of 9/11 are far from healed. No one is arguing that the feelings of the 9/11 families shouldn't be taken into account as we weigh what to do here.</p></blockquote><p>Isn't that odd? &nbsp;Given that just a short bit ago...</p><blockquote><p>But Republicans have gathered up their flaming torches and raised their fists to loudly denounce empathy and all empathy-based behavior as evil. Last Friday, RNC Chairman Michael Steele, sitting in for Bill Bennett on the Morning in America syndicated radio show, blurted out, "Crazy nonsense empathetic! I'll give you empathy. Empathize right on your behind!" Nice.</p><p>Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, speaking on This Week, warned that if a jurist were to show empathy, "politics, preferences, personal preferences and feelings might take the place of being impartial and deciding cases based upon the law, not upon politics."</p></blockquote><p>You mean, like deciding whether Cordoba House&nbsp;can be built on people's feelings rather than on the law of the Constitution?</p><blockquote><p>Wendy Long of the Judicial Confirmation Network saw empathy as a kind of temporary insanity that so distorts a jurist's vision as to make it difficult "to uphold the federal judicial oath to dispense justice impartially." Over on Fox News, Sean Hannity warned that empathy is the first step toward "social engineering."</p></blockquote><p>Can you say "hypocrisy" boys and girls? &nbsp;I think you can!</p><blockquote><p>What a tragically crabbed worldview one must have to believe that empathy means being sensitive only to "groups A, B, and C" because they share certain features or beliefs with you. That isn't empathy--that's bias. True empathy turns that notion on its head. It means, as Ruth Marcus wrote, the ability to recognize the ways your own experiences color your judgment. Empathy means knowing what you don't know and questioning why you think you know what you do.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7998">How the GOP wins in November</a></span></p><blockquote><p>This is your Sequoia touch-screen voting machine with Pac-Man hacked onto it without disturbing any of the "tamper-evident" seals supposedly meant to protect it from hackers...</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025318.php">Reasonable Republicans are not yet all dead!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"I hate to copy from the ads, but Sharron Angle is too extreme," said 81-year-old Reno resident Walt Mackenzie, a retiree and a registered Republican. "There are a lot of Republicans who just can't put up with the ticket she's trying to sell."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/21/fortenberry-refuses-impeachment/">GOP congressman refuses to join the Radical&nbsp;Reckless Right's anti-Obama crazy</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&amp;articleID=176799047&amp;gid=72423&amp;type=member&amp;item=27740496&amp;articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eyoutube%2Ecom%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNrzXLYA_e6E&amp;urlhash=4yO3&amp;goback=%2Egde_72423_member_27740496">"The horror... the horror...."&nbsp;</a></span>Palin's Greatest Hits</p><p><span><a href="http://www.alternet.org/belief/147908/why_we_must_always_be_skeptical/">Is Alternet the Left's version of Fox</a></span>, full of crazy people and extremists?</p><p><span><a href="http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/6982/bachmann-the-magic-bus-is-coming">Crazy Shelly "bans" cameras at campaign stop at an ammo company</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Why doesn't she want pictures of herself with the crowd at the Federal Ammunition stop? (Apparently photography and video are permitted at all the other events on the tour. Hey, wait a minute--*can* a member of Congress legally forbid citizens from taking photographs or video at a public campaign appearance?)</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/fareed-zakaria-gps-al-qaeda-vs-islam">If they&nbsp;</a></span><span><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/fareed-zakaria-gps-al-qaeda-vs-islam">don't</a></span></span><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/fareed-zakaria-gps-al-qaeda-vs-islam">&nbsp;build Cordoba House,&nbsp;al Qaeda wins</a>&nbsp;</span>Why do the wingnuts hate America and love bin Laden?&nbsp;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703589804575445841837725272.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5">In fact, their opposition is already helping "the enemy":</a></p><blockquote><p>Islamic radicals are seizing on protests against a planned Islamic community center near Manhattan's Ground Zero and anti-Muslim rhetoric elsewhere as a propaganda opportunity and are stepping up anti-U.S. chatter and threats on their websites.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025332.php">Hypocrisy watch</a></span>&nbsp;Remember when the wingnuts screamed about how vocal opposition to the war was helping the terrorists?</p><p><span><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100820/bs_yblog_upshot/news-corps-number-two-shareholder-funded-terror-mosque-planner">Heads will begin to explode in 3... 2... 1.... &nbsp;Fox TV's #2 stakeholder helped fund the Cordoba House</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025331.php">Theater of the Absurd</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The correct answer is to dismiss nonsense because it's nonsense. President Obama is a Christian. He's professed his Christian faith. He and his family were members of a Christian church. He's offered public testimony about his faith, and started a prayer circle in the White House with Christian pastors. Muslims don't do any of these things.</p></blockquote><p>The "Obama is a Muslim" canard is the sort of manure you spread when your political soil is barren or you have not even the seed of an idea to grow.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/august-suggestion">I understand what this cartoon is trying to say,</a></span>&nbsp;but the fact is that George Washington&nbsp;<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewashington">WAS</a>&nbsp;born in (what would become) "the country." &nbsp;He's as native born as the Native Americans in the comic. A dumb mistake easily avoided.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/dick-armey-medicare-trashes-constitution">GOP Suicide Watch</a></span>&nbsp;Wingnut/Tea party/GOP leader says Medicare "trashes the Constitution." &nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025330.php">And I love this</a>: &nbsp;Although Ryan and his cowardly GOP friends deny it, Armey puts it flat out on the table:</p><blockquote><p>"All Paul Ryan is saying is let Social Security be voluntary, let Medicare be voluntary," Armey said.</p></blockquote><p>Insane idea, but at least he's honest about what he's up to.</p><blockquote><p>Ryan himself has conceded that his GOP colleagues are too afraid to endorse a plan they agree with: "They're talking to their pollsters and their pollsters are saying, 'Stay away from this.'"</p><p>To this extent, Armey raises a reasonable argument: if Paul is putting on paper what Republicans really believe, why don't they have the courage of their convictions? Why not have the guts to endorse a budget plan that reflects their actual thinking?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/capital-punishment/kevin-keith-clemency-request-rejected-ohio-parole-board">Will Ohio follow Texas' lead and execute a man the evidence says is probably not guilty (shadow of a doubt and all that)?</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/08/17/reproductive-health-roadtrip-bringing-back-home">Doctors can be assh*les too</a></span></p><blockquote><p>...doctors who refuse to perform routine post-abortion check-ups or even to provide care for completely unrelated ailments to women who previously had abortions. What's worse, in two instances, we heard that these doctors were some of the few who were accepting Medicaid patients at all -- meaning that poor women would have to face greater obstacles to receive needed medical care. In one instance, we heard of a doctor throwing a patient's medical records on the ground and storming out after he learned she had had an abortion.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/08/dear-rev-franklin-obama-was-not-born-a-muslim-and-neither-is-anyone-else.html">Graham as usual is not only hateful but also plain wrong.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The Talmudic rule that one is a Jew by virtue of having a Jewish mother has been responsible for imagining the Jewish people as a race as well as a religion. (They are not actually a race, of course, and most Jewish women are descended from a Gentile ancestor).</p><p>But Muslims are not a race even in the imagining, but rather a world-religion to which belong people of virtually every ethnic group in the world. Thus, unlike in Judaism, one is not born a Muslim. Rather, children of Muslim parents who embrace Islam typically recite the confession of faith around puberty and undertake to fulfill the obligations of Islamic law at that time. Until that time, they are not mukallaf or obliged to perform the rituals of the religion. Franklin's allegation would imply that children are Muslim by birth and have to fast the month of Ramadan when they are 5. It is ridiculous.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025329.php">GOP suicide watch&nbsp;</a></span>No sensible person could possibly believe such transparent nonsense.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/nicole-belle/howard-dean-name-one-thing-republican">GOP suicide watch</a></span>&nbsp;Howard Dean points out the inconvenient "empty suit" truth of the current GOP</p><blockquote><p>They haven't had a single constructive -- name one -- anybody who's watching this show, name one single constructive political initiative that the Republicans have put forward.</p><p>And when, finally, somebody did put forward one, Paul Ryan, he was lionized for three days and then abandoned by the Republicans because he wanted to privatize Social Security and Medicare. Name one thing that you could hope for from the Republicans if they should win this. That is not a winning strategy.</p></blockquote><p>Still, I haven't gotten over Dean's complete ignorance and cowardice over the Cordoba House, and I wish he'd shut up and let someone else speak.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/blackwater-gets-42-million-hand-slap-roger">This is a true faith-bender.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Blackwater, the former Erik Prince "security company", has negotiated a $42 million settlement with the Department of State. Having taken their gulp of medicine, they will now be eligible for even more contracts with the Department of State. How does that work, exactly?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/21/despite-his-anti-government-rhetoric-gov-mcdonnells-budget-surplus-results-from-government-assistance/">Hypocrisy watch reaches "How do you sleep?" level!&nbsp;</a></span>VA governor and his friends at Fox go on at length about how his model of&nbsp;&nbsp;"fiscal prudence and conservative budgeting" should guide the federal government -- but failed to mention that&nbsp;&nbsp;last year's Recovery Act provided $2.5 billion in stimulus relief to "maintain crucial services for [Virginia] citizens" and "help close the state's budget shortfall in 2010-2012."</p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/39175">Prop room? &nbsp;Send up a mirror ASAP!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The panel on the Fox propaganda channel's Fox News Watch apparently finds no irony in the fact that 1)anyone on Fox is talking about honesty in broadcast news and 2)their panel includes the woman who helped sell the invasion of Iraq in The New York Times.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/23/after_hate_mongering_about_ground_zero_mosque_hannity_wonders_why_america_is_perceived_as_hostile_to_muslims.php#more">Oops, we need that mirror again</a></p><blockquote><p>Unrepentant bigot and Islamophobe Sean Hannity, who has used his prime time television hour to fear monger that Sharia law "is creeping into the United States," that "terrorists have infiltrated these extremist mosques that exist... here in America," and that Obama's Muslim advisor "shared the following thoughts about spreading Sharia law - take a look at this!" sounded genuinely puzzled as he wondered aloud why the United States is perceived as anti-Muslim</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/39185">GOP Suicide Watch</a></span>&nbsp;George Will: Mideast peace process is 'biggest threat to peace'</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/21/AR2010082102822.html?hpid=topnews">Sure, let's put our trust in our corporate masters!</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/corporate-ceos-teach-economic-catch-22-boog">The corporate Catch-22 boogie.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>We know it and they know it. We, the consumers, cannot and will not be spending anything until we're employed again. They the businesses, can, but will not, hire until we spend again. They would prefer to pay existing employees overtime than to hire new employees to fill the ranks of the employed.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/sovereign-citizenship-not-just-white">The crazy just keeps getting crazier</a></span></p><blockquote><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/sovereign-citizenship-not-just-white"></a></span>"sovereign citizens" -- those folks who believe in tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories about the government, including the notion that all you have to do is magically sign some documents an voila! You're no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government and its laws!</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/business/20tax.html?_r=4&amp;hp">Timothy Geithner was a big Wall Street insider at Goldman Sachs! &nbsp;Except he wasn't. &nbsp;Ever.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Mr. Geithner ... began as a lower-level civil servant late in the Reagan administration and left 12 years later as under secretary for international finance at the end of the Clinton administration.</p><p>He went to the International Monetary Fund for two years. In late 2003, he became president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, part of the Federal Reserve System -- picked by a board that includes the heads of some of the big banks that the New York Fed regulates.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2010/08/modoc-county-lesson-in-republican.html">A Lesson In Republican Extremism and Cult of Freeloading</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/39191">I've always opposed private armies</a></span>&nbsp;-- on moral, philosophical, legal, political and logistical grounds -- but here's a new one: &nbsp;They're corrupt little modern Mafia-style thugs.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/gop-ny-governor-candidate-paladino-argues-w">GOP Suicide</a></span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/gop-ny-governor-candidate-paladino-argues-w">&nbsp;</a><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/gop-ny-governor-candidate-paladino-argues-w">Watch&nbsp;</a></span>GOP NY Governor Candidate Paladino Argues for Welfare Camps</p><blockquote><p>I thought teabaggers believed in less government, not more. But Paladino wants to conscript the poor to work for the state and live in prisons in their off time, use state power to confiscate land and the right to build on that land because he doesn't like the religion of the owners of said land, and has no problem with sharing his somewhat twisted fantasies via email.</p></blockquote></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The once and future GOP, Part 2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/the-once-and-future-gop-part-2.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.348470</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-19T19:39:12Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-19T19:49:16Z</updated>
   
   <summary>You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension. A dimension of sound. A dimension of sight. A dimension of mind. You&apos;re moving into a land of both style and substance of things and ideas....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="34546" label="agenda" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49880" label="platform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5388" label="Republican" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><i>You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension. A dimension of sound. A dimension of sight. A dimension of mind. You're moving into a land of both style and substance of things and ideas. You've just crossed over into the Twilight Zone...</i></p><p>A couple of weeks ago, the<a href="http://filterednews.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/the-once-and-future-gop/">&nbsp;first part of this "series</a>"&nbsp;looked at the platforms of the first 20 years or so of the Republican Party and how it differed remarkably from the agenda, values and demeanor of today's Republican Party. Today, we pick up the theme...</p><p>Imagine if you will, a national Republican candidate running on the following platform:</p></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><b>Constitutional issues</b></p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/is-nh-gov-candidate-jack-kimball-jumping-on-the-nullification-bandwagon.php">Nullification Theory</a>&nbsp;-- which says states must ratify federal law -- is unconstitutional. &nbsp;Where federal law and state law conflict, it is the federal authority that must prevail.</p><p>I support the principle of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/blog/2446/glenn_beck's_and_newt_gingrich's_christian_nation/">church-state separation</a>&nbsp;and legislation stringent enough to&nbsp;<a href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/35964_Texas_BOE_Throws_Thomas_Jefferson_Down_the_Memory_Hole">divorce the political from the ecclesiastical power.</a></p><p>I stand against my opponents support for the&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/poll-one-third-of-georgia-republicans-approve-of-secession.php">principles</a>&nbsp;of those&nbsp;<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/23/tennessee-republican-floats-secession/?fbid=HG8qGnuEcw-">who</a>&nbsp;tried to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/23/723608/-Lots-of-unpatriotic-Texans-want-out-of-the-union">destroy</a>&nbsp;the nation.</p><p><b>Civil Rights</b></p><p>I support a constitutional amendment to&nbsp;<a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/06/27/scotus.school.vouchers/index.html">prohibit states from using public money to support religious schools</a>.</p><p>My opponent&nbsp;<a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/8/25/214334.shtml">works&nbsp;</a>to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Republican_Party_Abortion.htm">crush</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://filterednews.wordpress.com/2010/04/04/reckless-rights-twisted-notion-of-what-should-be-private/">individual</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/28/thurgood-marshall-elena-kagan_n_628662.html">rights</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/jon-stewart-takes-on-30-r_n_321985.html">it's wrong</a>.</p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=rally_round_the_true_constitution">equal protection under the law</a>; my opponents do not.</p><p>I support the right of American workers to&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/30/kline-mine-safety/">workplace safety</a>; my&nbsp;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/rand-paul-mine-regs/">opponents do not</a>.</p><p><b>Economic issues</b></p><p>Our<a href="http://www.4ibew.com/2008/03/03/american-axle-offers-real-life-look-at-how-nafta-hurts-workers/">&nbsp;trade policies must favor&nbsp;</a>and&nbsp;<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/24/dont-tread-on-us-workers/">protect American labor</a>.</p><p>My&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/03/republican-jobs-plan-tax-cuts-rich_n_669539.html">opponents&nbsp;</a>have&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/jon-stewart-boehners-stance-on-the-economy-is-profoundly-retarded-video.php">no other plan with which to improve the ruinous conditions which they had themselves produced</a>.</p><p>I am unalterably opposed to&nbsp;<a href="http://news.cnet.com/Waging-battle-on-foreign-labor/2009-1022_3-5888772.html">placing our workingmen in competition with any form of servile labor</a>, whether at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.alternet.org/immigration/94703/exploited%3A_the_plight_of_the_undocumented_worker/">home&nbsp;</a>or&nbsp;<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_48/b4011001.htm">abroad</a>.</p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/13/gopers-line-up-to-repeal_n_680733.html">economic</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/07/dealbook-dialogue-lynn-stout/">reform</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/bp-attorney-rig-had-390-overdue-maintenance-items">corporate</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.theusconstitution.org/upload/fck/file/File_storage/Chamber%20Win%20Statistics%20formatted%20end%20of%20term%206-25%20final.pdf">regulation</a>.</p><p>I oppose&nbsp;<a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2000/11/trillion-dollar-hideaway">trusts</a>&nbsp;and other&nbsp;<a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/05/corporations-sitting-on-1-84-trillion-cash/">huge collections of wealth</a>&nbsp;that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28456-2004Oct12.html">makes life harder</a>&nbsp;for the American people.</p><p>We must work to&nbsp;<a href="http://crooksandliars.com/2007/01/26/ted-kennedy-lashes-out-against-the-gops-opposition-to-increasing-the-minimum-wage">increase wages for our laborers</a>, not try to&nbsp;<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/would-cutting-the-minimum-wage-raise-employment/">reduce them</a>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.manufacturing.net/article.aspx?id=160462">foreign levels</a>.</p><p>The policy of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLM1UhAAWow">government handing favoring corporations</a>&nbsp;must end.</p><p>I support the federal government's right and duty to regulate&nbsp;<a href="http://www.justice.gov/olc/1stlady.htm">interstate commerce</a>.</p><p>The government must&nbsp;<a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/joannmuller/2010/08/18/obamas-plan-for-gm-is-on-track/?boxes=businesschannelsections">take steps to help those American industries that are suffering in the recession.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/25/60minutes/main551091.shtml">No-bid contracts</a>&nbsp;from the government must be prohibited.</p><p>I favor a progressive tax that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0414/p03s01-usgn.html">relieves the tax burden of the laborer</a>, not a<a href="http://www.ehow.com/list_6327901_problems-flat-tax.html">&nbsp;flat tax</a>&nbsp;that favors the rich.</p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100810/ARTICLE/8101048/2113/BUSINESS&amp;tc=omni">enforcement</a>&nbsp;of the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/14784/interview-california-overtime-5.html">8-hour workday&nbsp;</a>laws.</p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/President44/story?id=6757817&amp;page=1">equal pay for equal work</a>&nbsp;and an increase in women's spheres of influence;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.eagleforum.org/misc/descript.html">our opponents do not.</a></p><p>I oppose&nbsp;<a href="http://reclaimdemocracy.org/civil_rights/public_use_corporate_abuse.php">giving public lands over to corporate use</a>.</p><p>My opponents have a record of unparalleled incapacity, dishonor and disaster. They have&nbsp;<a href="http://www.examiner.com/obama-administration-in-new-york/record-deficit-is-nothing-compared-to-the-surplus-bush-blew">ruthlessly sacrificed indispensable revenue</a>, entailed an&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-progress-report/the-bush-deficit_b_169475.html">unceasing deficit</a>, eked out ordinary current expenses with&nbsp;<a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0801/greenspan-end-bush-tax-cuts/">borrowed</a>&nbsp;money,&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/11/bush-debt/">piled up the public debt</a>, forced an&nbsp;<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16616">adverse balance of trade</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_holly_sk_080415_tax_day_gifts_for_th.htm">pawned American credit to alien syndicates</a>. In the broad effect of its policy it has&nbsp;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJQwbwMxHlU">precipitated panic</a>, blighted industry and trade with&nbsp;<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/moneybeat/2008/12/recession-hits.html">prolonged recession</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2003/oct/25/nation/na-wisconsin25">closed factories</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.thoughttheater.com/2006/08/real_wages_decline_under_bush.php">reduced work and wages</a>, halted enterprise and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a0e57222-1fb7-11da-853a-00000e2511c8.html">crippled American production</a>.</p><p><b>Education</b></p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/perry-education-injustice/">federal funding of public education</a>.</p><p><b>Political issues</b></p><p>My opponents are placing&nbsp;<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/02/18/conservatism-for-party-over-co">party over country</a>, and it's wrong.</p><p>My opponents are using&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/files/z_historic/tba05/block-and-blame.pdf">obstruction for political ends</a>, regardless of&nbsp;<a href="http://crooksandliars.com/2008/08/04/roy-blunt-throws-down-the-gauntlet-says-democrats-must-allow-off-shore-drilling-or-repubs-will-shut-down-congress">the needs of the nation</a>, and it's wrong.</p><p>My opponents are committing<a href="http://www.thepoliticalhub.com/list/21.aspx">&nbsp;election fraud</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7765">tampering with the vote</a>, and it's wrong.</p><p>I support&nbsp;<a href="http://reformelections.org/">election reform&nbsp;</a>so that&nbsp;&nbsp;every citizen of the United States shall be allowed to cast one free and unrestricted ballot in all public elections, and that such ballot shall be counted and returned as cast; that such laws shall be enacted and enforced as will secure to every citizen, be he rich or poor, native or foreign-born, white or black, this sovereign right, guaranteed by the Constitution.</p><p>My opponents are&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/rachel-maddow-takes-down-fox-news-for-scare-white-people-tactics-video.php">using race and racism to divide the nation and get votes</a>, and it's wrong.</p><p><b>Here's the "Twilight Zone" part</b></p><p>Submitted for your approval: a<i>&nbsp;real&nbsp;</i>Republican. &nbsp;Obviously, this candidate is going to be loudly and repeatedly damned by today's Republican leadership and talking heads. There isn't a plank in this platform that isn't the opposite of what today's most vocal and visible Republicans are selling. The weird part is, this candidate is more genuinely Republican than those who would tar and feather him, because&nbsp;this candidate's platform is taken directly from the Republican platform in 1880, 1884, 1888, 1892, 1896 and 1900.</p><p>As noted in Part 1: &nbsp;Lincoln and the first Republicans were, obviously, socialists. I expect any day now Glenn Beck will scribble on his chalk board the irrefutable connections between them and Richard Owen, who had died just two years before. &nbsp;In a fit of integrity, Fox News, the RNC, the GOP, the Tea Party, Palin's Twitter and the Texas board of education will all "refudiate" (sorry, couldn't resist) and remove from our history books at least the first two decades of Republicans and at least the first three Republican presidents.</p><p>Or maybe we'll all wake up and discover it's all been a really bad dream.</p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29625">1880</a></p><p><b>The Constitution of the United States is a supreme law</b>, and not a mere contract. Out of confederated States it made a sovereign nation. Some powers are denied to the Nation, while others are denied to the States; but<b> the boundary between the powers delegated and those reserved is to be determined by the National and not by the State tribunal.</b></p><p>The Constitution wisely forbids Congress to make any law respecting the establishment of religion, but it is idle to hope that the Nation can be protected against the influence of secret sectarianism while each State is exposed to its domination. We, therefore, recommend that the Constitution be so amended as to<b>&nbsp;lay the same prohibition upon the Legislature of each State, and to forbid the appropriation of public funds to the support of sectarian schools.</b></p><p>We affirm the belief, avowed in 1876, that the duties levied for the purpose of revenue should so&nbsp;<b>discriminate as to favor American labor</b>; that<span>&nbsp;no further grants of the public domain should be made to any railway or other corporation.</span>.. &nbsp;that we deem it the duty of Congress to develop and improve our sea-coast and harbors, but insist that&nbsp;<b>further subsidies to private persons or corporations must cease...</b></p><p>We charge upon the Democratic party the habitual sacrifice of patriotism and justice to a supreme and insatiable lust for office and patronage; that to obtain possession of the National Government, and control of the place,&nbsp;<span>they have obstructed all efforts&nbsp;</span>to promote the purity and to conserve the freedom of the suffrage, and have&nbsp;<b>devised fraudulent ballots</b>&nbsp;and invented fraudulent certification of returns... have, by methods vicious in principle and tyrannical in practice,<span>&nbsp;attached partisan legislation to appropriation bills, upon whose passage the very movement of the Government depended</span>; have&nbsp;<b>crushed the rights of the individual</b>; have&nbsp;<b>advocated the principles and sought the favor of the Rebellion against the Nation..</b>.</p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29626">1884</a></p><p>We, therefore, demand that the imposition of duties on foreign imports shall be made, not "for revenue only," but that in raising the requisite revenues for the government, such duties shall be so levied as to afford security to our diversified industries and&nbsp;<b>protection to the rights and wages of the laborer</b>; to the end&nbsp;<b>that active and intelligent labor... may have its just reward, and the laboring man his full share in the national prosperity.</b></p><p>Against the so-called economic system of the Democratic party,&nbsp;<b>which would degrade our labor to the foreign standard, we enter our earnest protest.</b></p><p>The Republican party pledges itself to correct the inequalities of the tariff, and to reduce the surplus, not by the vicious and&nbsp;<b>indiscriminate process of horizontal reduction</b>, but by such methods as will&nbsp;<b>relieve the tax-payer without injuring the laborer</b>...</p><p>We recognize the importance of sheep husbandry in the United States,<span>&nbsp;the serious depression which it is now experiencing, and the danger threatening its future prosperity;</span>&nbsp;and we, therefore, respect the demands of the representatives of this important agricultural interest for a readjustment of duties upon foreign wool, in order that such&nbsp;<b>industry shall have full and adequate protection</b><span>.</span></p><p>The regulation of commerce with foreign nations and between the States, is one of the most important prerogatives of the general government; and the Republican party distinctly announces its purpose to&nbsp;<b>support</b>&nbsp;such legislation as will fully and efficiently carry out&nbsp;<b>the constitutional power of Congress over inter-State commerce.</b></p><p><b>The principle of public regulation of</b>&nbsp;railway&nbsp;<b>corporations is a wise and salutary one for the protection of all classes of the people</b><span>;</span>&nbsp;and we favor legislation that shall&nbsp;<b>prevent unjust discrimination.</b><span>..</span>&nbsp;and that shall secure to&nbsp;<b>the people ... the fair and equal protection of the laws.</b></p><p>We favor the establishment of&nbsp;<b>a national bureau of labor;</b> the&nbsp;<b>enforcement of the eight hour law</b>, a wise and judicious system of&nbsp;<b>general education by adequate appropriation from the national revenues</b>, wherever the same is needed. We believe that everywhere&nbsp;<b>the protection to a citizen of American birth must be secured to citizens by American</b><span> </span><b>adoption</b><span>;</span>&nbsp;and we favor the&nbsp;<b>settlement of national differences by international arbitration.</b></p><p>The Republican party, having its birth in a hatred of slave labor and a&nbsp;<b>desire that all men may be truly free and equal</b>, is&nbsp;<span>u</span><b>nalterably opposed to placing our workingmen in competition with any form of servile labor, whether at home or abroad.</b></p><p>The public lands are a heritage of the people of the United States... We are&nbsp;<b>opposed to the acquisition of large tracts of these lands by corporations....</b></p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29627">1888</a></p><p>.... we insist that the<span>&nbsp;duties... shall be adjusted and maintained so as to furnish full and adequate protection to that industry throughout the United States</span><b>.</b></p><p>....revision of the tariff laws as will tend to&nbsp;<b>check imports of such articles as are produced by our people, the production of which gives employment to our labor...</b></p><p>We declare our opposition to&nbsp;<b>all combinations of capital organized in trusts or otherwise to control arbitrarily the condition of trade among our citizens</b><span>;&nbsp;</span>and we recommend to Congress and the State Legislatures in their respective jurisdictions such legislation as will&nbsp;<b>prevent the execution of all schemes to oppress the people by undue charges on their supplies...</b></p><p>...to place upon the statute books&nbsp;<b>legislation stringent enough to divorce the political from the ecclesiastical power...</b></p><p>The free school is the promoter of that intelligence which is to preserve us a free Nation; therefore,<b>&nbsp;the State or Nation, or both combined, should support free institutions of learning sufficient to afford every child growing up in the land the opportunity of a good common school education.</b></p><p>...we protest against the passage by Congress of a free ship bill as&nbsp;<b>calculated to work injustice to labor by lessening the wages</b>&nbsp;of those engaged in preparing materials as well as those directly employed in our shipyards. ....</p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29628">1892</a></p><p>We believe that all articles which cannot be produced in the United States, except luxuries, should be admitted free of duty, and that&nbsp;<b>on all imports coming into competition with the products of American labor, there should be levied duties equal to the difference between wages abroad and at home.</b></p><p>We demand that<span>&nbsp;every citizen of the United States shall be allowed to cast one free and unrestricted ballot in all public elections, and that such ballot shall be counted and returned as cast</span><b>;&nbsp;that such laws shall be enacted and enforced as will secure to every citizen, be he rich or poor, native or foreign-born, white or black, this sovereign right, guaranteed by the Constitution.</b>&nbsp;The free and honest popular ballot, the just and equal representation of all the people, as well as their just and equal protection under the laws, are the foundation of our Republican institutions, and<span>&nbsp;the party will never relax its efforts until the integrity of the ballot and the purity of elections shall be fully guaranteed and protected in every State.</span></p><p>We&nbsp;<b>favor efficient legislation by Congress to protect the life and limbs of employees</b>&nbsp;of transportation companies engaged in carrying on inter-State commerce, and recommend legislation by the respective States that will protect employees engaged in State commerce,&nbsp;<b>in mining and manufacturing.</b></p><p>The ultimate reliance of free popular government is the intelligence of the people, and the maintenance of freedom among men. We therefore declare anew our devotion to liberty of thought and conscience, of speech and press, and approve all agencies and instrumentalities which contribute to the education of the children of the land, but while&nbsp;<b>insisting upon the fullest measure of religious liberty,we are opposed to any union of Church and State.</b></p><p>We reaffirm our opposition, declared in the&nbsp;Republican platform of 1888, to&nbsp;<b>all combinations of capital organized in trusts or otherwise, to control arbitrarily the condition of trade among our citizens.</b></p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29629">1896</a></p><p>It (our opponents' time in power) has been<b>&nbsp;a record of unparalleled incapacity, dishonor and disaster.</b> In administrative management&nbsp;<b>it has ruthlessly sacrificed indispensable revenue, entailed an unceasing deficit, eked out ordinary current expenses with borrowed money, piled up the public debt...&nbsp;forced an adverse balance of trade... &nbsp;pawned American credit to alien syndicates.</b>...&nbsp;In the broad effect of its policy&nbsp;<b>it has precipitated panic, blighted industry and trade with prolonged depression, closed factories, reduced work and wages, halted enterprise and crippled American production....</b></p><p>..<b>.true American policy taxes foreign products and encourages home industry.</b> It puts the burden of revenue on foreign goods;&nbsp;<b>it secures the American market for the American producer. It upholds the American standard of wages for the American workingman; it&nbsp;puts the factory by the side of the farm and makes the American farmer less dependent on foreign demand and price</b>; it&nbsp;<b>diffuses general thrift, and founds the strength of all on the strength of each</b>. In its reasonable application<b>&nbsp;it is just, fair and impartial, equally opposed to foreign control and domestic monopoly to sectional discrimination</b>&nbsp;and individual favoritism.</p><p><b>We denounce the present tariff as sectional, injurious to the public credit and destructive to business enterprise.</b> We demand such an equitable tariff on foreign imports which come into competition with the American products as will not only furnish adequate revenue for the necessary expenses of the Government, but will&nbsp;<b>protect American labor from degradation and the wage level of other lands. ...&nbsp;The ruling and uncompromising principle is the protection and development of American labor and industries.</b></p><p><b>To all our products</b>; to those of the mine and the fields, as well as to those of the shop and the factory, to hemp and wool, the product of the great industry sheep husbandry; as well as to the foundry, as to the mills,<span>&nbsp;we promise the most ample protection</span><b>.</b></p><p>The Republican party is&nbsp;<b>mindful of the rights and interests of women, and believes that they should be accorded equal opportunities, equal pay for equal work, and protection to the home. We favor the admission of women to wider spheres of usefulness</b></p><p><a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29630">1900</a></p><p>....<b>business was dead, industry paralyzed and the National credit disastrously impaired</b>. The country's&nbsp;<b>capital was hidden away and its labor distressed and unemployed.</b> The Democrats&nbsp;<b>had no other plan with which to improve the ruinous conditions which they had themselves produced</b></p><p>...we&nbsp;<b>condemn all conspiracies and combinations intended to restrict business, to&nbsp;create monopolies</b>, to limit production... or to control prices;</p><p>We&nbsp;<b>renew our faith in the policy of Protection to American labor.</b></p><p><b>We congratulate the women of America upon their splendid record of public service in the volunteer aid association and as nurses in camp and hospital</b>&nbsp;during the recent campaigns of our armies in the East and West Indies, and&nbsp;<b>we appreciate their faithful co-operation in all works of education and industry.</b></p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The great churchless lie about Islam</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/the-great-churchless-lie-about.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.348063</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-17T04:20:18Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-17T04:22:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In the fuss over whether to build an Islamic center a couple of blocks away from Ground Zero, one of the most smug -- and, so far as I can tell, as yet unchallenged -- arguments is that there are...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="11303" label="Christian" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5214" label="church" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49320" label="Ground" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="123" label="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49114" label="mosque" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6957" label="Muslim" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32791" label="Zero" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p>In the fuss over whether to build an Islamic center a couple of blocks away from Ground Zero, one of the most smug -- and, so far as I can tell, as yet unchallenged -- arguments is that there are no Christian churches in Muslim nations. &nbsp;(Skip, for now, the bizarre implication that we should give up freedom of religion because other nations don't have freedom of religion.) &nbsp;The Christian superiority and persecution exaggerations<a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/a/m/americandad/2010/08/today-these-links-leave-me-fee.php#comment-4061595">&nbsp;can get pretty wild:</a></p><blockquote><p>Go to any Christian country and carry a Koran in public. Nothing will happen to you. Try carrying a Bible openly in any Islamic country - you will be arrested, and may be executed. There is no comparison.</p></blockquote><p>OK, let's stop for just a moment to challenge the first part of that statement by noting that hate crimes in the United States against people of Middle-Eastern descent increased from 354 attacks in 2000 to 1,501 attacks in 2001. Thanks to the ignorance of American bigots, non-Muslims and non-Arabs &nbsp;were caught up n the anti-Islamic fever, including several Sikh men attacked for wearing their religiously mandated turban. &nbsp;The bigots don't always miss:&nbsp;&nbsp;45% of students and 37% of Arab Americans of the Muslim faith report being targeted by discrimination. &nbsp;Then there's the conservative leaders who said this past week that&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/sears_spelling_bees_and_sea_creatures_bryan_fischer_and_the_afas_strange_and_lurid_history_of_hate.php?ref=fpblg">"no more mosques, period"</a>&nbsp;in the U.S." &nbsp;He also said he thought we should kick American Muslims out of the country and send them to Muslim nations. And&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Angry-protesters-descend-on-mosque-606515.php">there's this</a>&nbsp;from last week:</p><blockquote><p>About a dozen right-wing Christians, carrying placards and yelling "Islam is a lie," angrily confronted worshippers outside a Fairfield Avenue mosque&nbsp;Friday.</p><p>"Jesus hates Muslims," they screamed at worshippers arriving at the Masjid An-Noor mosque to prepare for the holy month of Ramadan. One protester shoved a placard at a group of young children leaving the mosque. "Murderers," he&nbsp;shouted.</p></blockquote><p>Oh yeah, being muslim in America: &nbsp;Good times, good times....</p><p>But back to the garbage about there not being Christian churches in Islamic nations: Join me now on a photographic refutation.</p></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><br /></p><p>Vank Cathedral in Esfahan, Iran</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/2052852000_dfbbe79bc8_o.jpg"><img title="Vank Cathedral, Esfahan" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/2052852000_dfbbe79bc8_o.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p><p>St. Sarkis Cathedral in Tehran:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/armenians-march-tehran1.jpg"><img title="armenians-march-tehran1" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/armenians-march-tehran1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="202" /></a></p><p>Sacred Heart Cathedral in Casablanca:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cathedrale-du-sacre.jpg"><img title="Cathedrale-du-Sacre" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cathedrale-du-sacre.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="290" /></a></p><p>St. Pierre Cathedral in Rabat:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/114647252.jpg"><img title="11464725" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/114647252.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p><p>Kuwait:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-31-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.00.31 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-31-pm.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="178" /></a></p><p>Bahrain:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-02-07-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.02.07 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-02-07-pm.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="177" /></a></p><p>Bangladesh:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-52-pm1.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.01.52 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-52-pm1.png?w=256" alt="" width="256" height="300" /></a></p><p>Indonesia:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-22-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.01.22 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-22-pm.png" alt="" width="290" height="204" /></a></p><p>Iran:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-04-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.01.04 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-01-04-pm.png?w=242" alt="" width="242" height="300" /></a></p><p>Jordan:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-50-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.00.50 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-50-pm.png?w=278" alt="" width="278" height="300" /></a></p><p>Lybia:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-16-pm1.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.00.16 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-16-pm1.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="227" /></a></p><p>Syria:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-00-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 9.00.00 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-9-00-00-pm.png?w=253" alt="" width="253" height="300" /></a></p><p>Turkey:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-8-59-44-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 8.59.44 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-8-59-44-pm.png?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a></p><p>United Arab Emirates:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-8-59-22-pm.png"><img title="Screen shot 2010-08-16 at 8.59.22 PM" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screen-shot-2010-08-16-at-8-59-22-pm.png?w=283" alt="" width="283" height="300" /></a></p><p>Cathedral de Tanger in Tanger:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/180px-cattan_12.jpg"><img title="180px-Cattan_1" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/180px-cattan_12.jpg?w=112" alt="" width="112" height="150" /></a></p><p>Cathedral in Cairo.</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/dsc02141.jpg"><img title="DSC02141" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/dsc02141.jpg?w=225" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a></p><p>St. Mark Cathedral in Alexandria:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/st-marks-1.jpg"><img title="St. Marks 1" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/st-marks-1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p><p>Church of the Annunciation in Alexandria:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cathedral_egypt_01.jpg"><img title="cathedral_egypt_01" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cathedral_egypt_01.jpg?w=217" alt="" width="217" height="300" /></a></p><p>St. Michael Assouan Cathedral in Aswan:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/assouan_cathedrale_copte.jpg"><img title="135_C" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/assouan_cathedrale_copte.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="257" /></a></p><p>Algiers Cathedral in Algeria:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/algeria-alger-id29336.jpg"><img title="--algeria--alger--id=29336" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/algeria-alger-id29336.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p><p>St. Stephanos Cathedral in Jolffa, Iran:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/800pxstephanuser0.jpg"><img title="800pxstephanuser0" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/800pxstephanuser0.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="119" /></a></p><p>St. Thaddeus Cathedral in Makku:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/pattern-php.jpeg"><img title="pattern.php" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/pattern-php.jpeg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="207" /></a></p><p>Church of Shiraz:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/27516334dvjiarghkqph8qa.jpg"><img title="27516334dvjiarghkqph8qa" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/27516334dvjiarghkqph8qa.jpg?w=211" alt="" width="211" height="300" /></a></p><p>Our lady of the Rosary, in Doha, Qatar:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/2335291678_cab8c3f9fe_b1.jpg"><img title="2335291678_cab8c3f9fe_b" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/2335291678_cab8c3f9fe_b1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a></p><p>National Evangelical Church in Kuwait:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/610x.jpg"><img title="Amanuel Ghareeb, the only priest in Kuwa" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/610x.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p><p>Our Lady of Arabia:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ahmadi_ola2.jpg"><img title="ahmadi_ola2" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ahmadi_ola2.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p><p>Christmas in Tehran:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/gulfchristmas.jpg"><img title="GulfChristmas" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/gulfchristmas.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/iran-christmas-shopping.jpg"><img title="IRAN-CHRISTMAS-SHOPPING" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/iran-christmas-shopping.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p><p>Christmas in Kuwait:</p><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/christmas-kuwait-2008-01.jpg"><img src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/christmas-kuwait-2008-01.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p><p>This is just a sampling, of course, but it's enough to reveal this particular wingnut lie. &nbsp;Next!</p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Today, these links leave me feeling disgusted</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/today-these-links-leave-me-fee.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.347925</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-16T01:23:11Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-16T01:37:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[How much unemployment can we pin on Obama?&nbsp;"Their number is negligible and they are stupid."Eisenhower's Republican Party has come a long way in the last half-century, and what was once considered fringe stupidity has become far more common. And with...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="586" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="208" label="corruption" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14609" label="Gibbs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="33" label="immigration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49743" label="Islamic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="730" label="jobs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5388" label="Republican" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5145" label="tax" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/who_can_we_blame_for_job_losse.html">How much unemployment can we pin on Obama?&nbsp;</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/who_can_we_blame_for_job_losse.html"></a></span><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025186.php">"Their number is negligible and they are stupid."</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Eisenhower's Republican Party has come a long way in the last half-century, and what was once considered fringe stupidity has become far more common. And with Social Security celebrating its 75th anniversary, there's a renewed effort to shine a light on the GOP's willingness to gut this bedrock American institution, if not eliminate it altogether.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheMediaFreedomFoundation/~3/CrQZzVsvm7M/">Collapse in Living Standards in America</a></span></p></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><b><span></span></b></p><b><p><a href="http://dailycensored.com/2010/08/12/gibbs-outed-as-republican-mole-2/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Dailycensored+%28Daily+Censored%29"><span>There's some wild crazy on the Left, too.</span>&nbsp;</a>It seems&nbsp;(cough, cough)&nbsp;that Robert Gibbs is using magical powers obtained from Charles Manson's buddy to undermine Dems in elections for the sake of a shadow world government.</p><blockquote><p>Gibbs learned the secret history of the world and special mind control techniques by studying ancient Egyptian texts, the Illuminati collections, and hitherto unreleased manuscripts from the Mayan civilization. Over time the pupil outpaced the teacher causing Gibbs to visit and study with the elite of European cults, including the Bilderberg group, the Club of Rome, and the Knights Templar. (Image: Gibbs personal coat of arms)</p><p>Having mastered the dark arts, Gibbs took on his first high profile assignment for the shadow world government</p></blockquote><p>Damn. &nbsp;That's as crazy as the Anti-Christ crap thrown at Obama.</p></b></span><b></b><p></p><p><span><a href="http://www.news-leader.com/article/20100813/OPINIONS03/8130321/Republicans-backed-mandate-in-past">Hypocrisy watch: &nbsp;Who came up with the "unconstitutional" insurance mandate?</a></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><blockquote><p><span>Who came up with the idea of the individual mandate anyway? Mark V. Pauly, Wharton professor of economics, told NPR's Julie Rovner he and other market-oriented economists came up with the idea. The individual mandate was then taken up by the Heritage Foundation in a 1990 Background Report #777.</span></p><p><span>The individual mandate appeared in legislation introduced in 1993 to the 103rd Congress as S.1770 by Sen. John Chafee (R-R.I.) and cosponsored by Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Robert Bennett (R-Utah), and Kit Bond (R-Mo.). You may recognize some of these names.</span></p><p><span>"Subtitle F: Universal Coverage - Requires each citizen or lawful permanent resident to be covered under a qualified health plan or equivalent health care program by Jan. 1, 2005."</span></p><p><span>More recently the individual mandate was supported by Newt Gingrich in his 2008 book, "Real Change" p 276: "Finally, we should insist that everyone above a certain level buy coverage (or, if they are opposed to insurance, post a bond). Meanwhile, we should provide tax credits or subsidize private insurance for the poor.</span></p><p><br /></p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.cato.org/immigration"><b>Facts about immigration are just sooooo inconvenient to the prevailing narrative</b></a></span></p><blockquote><p><span><span>The overriding impact of immigrants is to strengthen and enrich American culture, increase the total output of the economy, and raise the standard of living of American citizens. Immigrants are advantageous to the United States for several reasons: (1) Since they are willing to take a chance in a new land, they are self-selected on the basis on motivation, risk taking, work ethic, and other attributes beneficial to a nation. (2) They tend to come to the United States during their prime working years (the average age is 28), and they contribute to the workforce and make huge net contributions to old-age entitlement programs, primarily Social Security. (3) Immigrants tend to fill niches in the labor market where demand is highest relative to supply, complementing rather than directly competing with American workers. (4) Many immigrants arrive with extremely high skill levels, and virtually all, regardless of skill level, bring a strong desire to work. (5) Their children tend to reach high levels of achievement in American schools and in society at large.</span></span></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025185.php"><b>It's often hard to predict what constitutes a career-killing moment on talk radio, but I have a hard time imagining sponsors sticking with this show in the future</b>.</a><span>&nbsp;But we're in a post-racial society, right? &nbsp;Give me a break.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/glenn_beck_sabo.html"><b>This is one of those times when his whole ridiculous act can be seriously dangerous</b></a><b>.</b>&nbsp;<span>He's playing this character and urging his viewers to sabotage their own well-being.</span></p><p><a href="http://firedoglake.com/2010/08/15/6-questions-for-republicans-who-oppose-a-mosque-in-lower-manhattan/"><b>6 questions for the anti-Islamic center crowd</b></a></p><blockquote><p><span>1. Since the proposed site for the Park51 worship space is 2 blocks away from Ground Zero, why do you keep calling it the "Ground Zero Mosque"?</span></p><p><span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span>2. What precisely is an acceptable distance from the former site of the World Trade Center for Muslims to practice their religion? (Terms like "so close" or "in the shadow of" or "steps away" are obviously subjective.)</span></p><p><span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span>3. Is there a difference between violent Islamic extremists and mainstream Muslims?</span></p><p><span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span>4. If your answer to #3 is "yes," why is there an objection to Muslims practicing their religion in Lower Manhattan?</span></p><p><span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span>5. Since Muslims have been holding religious services at Park51 for over a year, should they be stopped?</span></p><p><span><span><span></span></span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><span><p></p><p></p><p><span>6. As Park51 is private property, are you in favor of the government regulating how the space is utilized?</span></p></span><p></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://mydd.com/2010/8/12/wyoming-forced-to-susp"><b>Threats of violence halt tax collections</b></a></p><blockquote><p><span>In early July, the Department of Revenue in Wyoming suspended sales tax collections at gun shows because of increasing animosity toward the state's field tax agents that jeopardized their safety....</span></p><p><span>Check any of the far-right blogs and you will find regular calls for "patriot uprisings" or comments that in effect call for "patriotic citizens" to get ready for the coming war. On Free Republic, the comments on this story ranged from "our tea-partying Bostonian ancestors would be proud" to "the government...any government...absolutely needs to fear the people."</span></p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/node/38969">In that narrow strip of real estate called ConservativeLand, older workers should either starve to death or drop dead looking for a job they're not going to find, but God forbid they should actually see any prospect of retiring.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/ex-fbi-official-debunks-terror-babies-conspiracy-theory-on-cnn-video.php?ref=fpb">Ex-FBI Official Debunks 'Terror Babies' Conspiracy Theory</a>&nbsp;</span>Kinda like debunking the theories that Santa is real and the Milwaukee Brewers are a professional baseball team -- way too easy and completely unnecessary. &nbsp;Not to fret, though,&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/gohmert-terrorists-immigration/">the wingnut doesn't let so small a thing as a fact stand in his way.</a>&nbsp;And he's got&nbsp;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/debbie-riddle-immigration/">a friend</a>!</p><p><span><a href="http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1899/am-i-right-or-left">Quote of the Day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"In my own mind, I have the same political philosophy I've always had--basically libertarian but tempered by Burkean small-C conservatism. But I am no longer a member of the Republican Party and no longer consider myself part of the "conservative movement." That's not because I changed, but because I believe that they have. The Republican Party of today is not the party of Jack Kemp and Ronald Reagan that I was once a member of; it stands for nothing except the pursuit of power as an end in itself, with no concern whatsoever for what is right for the country. In a recent interview with The Economist magazine, I characterized the Republicans as the greedy, sociopathic party. I stand by that," - Bruce Bartlett, economic adviser under Reagan and H.W. Bush.</p></blockquote><p>This is very much what I've experienced in my political life, except that my breaking point came much sooner, as Reagan et al moved too far to the right for me.</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/the_evidence_on_anchor_babies.html">The myth of the anchor baby</a></span></p><blockquote><p>When people hear about anchor babies, they assume the parents of these tiny citizens get automatic citizenship. Not quite. The parents of these tiny citizens might get citizenship -- but it'll take more than 30 years. Politifact explains:</p><p>It's important to note that having an "anchor baby" won't do much to help a Mexican mom become a U.S. citizen. Because citizen children cannot sponsor their parents for citizenship until they turn 21 -- and because if the parents were ever illegal, they would have to return home for 10 years before applying to come in -- having a baby to secure citizenship for its parents is an extremely long-term, and uncertain, process.</p><p>As for whether we're really seeing what Lindsey Graham called "drop and leave," in which immigrant parents head over and give birth and then head back to their home countries to wait 31 years for citizenship, well, as you might expect, "immigration data and surveys don't provide much support for Graham's notion."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/the_daily_show_on_tax_cuts.html">Jon Stewart rips apart the GOPer's tax cut nonsense</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/uncertainty_legislation_and_th.html">I keep hearing about how policy uncertainty is holding us back,</a></span>&nbsp;I still haven't heard, or been able to generate, any compelling data to support that argument.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025212.php">Jimmy Carter is the worst American ever, followed by Obama and FDR</a></span>&nbsp;-- according to a survey of more than 100 leading conservative blogs. &nbsp;This was just too much for some on the Right:</p><blockquote><p>Frankly, this is embarrassing. Putting the Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Gore, Sharpton, and other contemporary Democrats ahead of someone like Nathan Bedford Forest who was at least partly responsible for creating the KKK after the Civil War and spent his spare nights riding around the countryside whipping, lynching, and burning at the stake innocent African Americans demonstrates an extraordinary ignorance of American history.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://mydd.com/users/michael-bersin/posts/post-racial-america-jo-co-mo-dems-receive-racist-bumper-stickers-in-the-mail-2">Welcome to&nbsp;</a></span><span><span><a href="http://mydd.com/users/michael-bersin/posts/post-racial-america-jo-co-mo-dems-receive-racist-bumper-stickers-in-the-mail-2">(ahem)</a></span></span><span><a href="http://mydd.com/users/michael-bersin/posts/post-racial-america-jo-co-mo-dems-receive-racist-bumper-stickers-in-the-mail-2">&nbsp;post-racial America.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/14/erickson-tweets-mosque/">Will CNN now fire the Pillsbury Dough Boy's ugly cousin?&nbsp;</a></span>CNN Contributor Erickson Compares Building of Mosque To 'Human Sacrifice' causing&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/worst_person_44.html">Bob Cesa&nbsp;</a>to ask:</p><blockquote><p>Of course the obvious question here: if the right to have organized worship of Muhammed will lead to the allowance of satanic human sacrifice, what the hell will the ingestion of "the body and blood of Christ" lead to?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://kaystreet.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/10-myths-about-islam/">10 Myths about Islam&nbsp;</a></span>(not to say there are only 10)</p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/third-world-america-chron_b_676474.html">Third World America: Chronicling the Assault on America's Middle Class...and the Solutions</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/13/the-most-homoerotic-vinta_n_663796.html">What the Religious Right failed to save us from</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/fk_the_hallowed.html">I can't wait to try on pants inside the Ground Zero Gap.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/angle-un/">Wingnutopia must be such a weird place&nbsp;</a></span>Sharron Angle Claims United Nations Is Unconstitutional</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/the_bush_tax_plan_vs_the_obama.html">The Bush tax plan vs. the Obama tax plan in one chart</a></span></p><p><a href="http://www.americablog.com/2010/08/fda-approves-emergency-5-day.html"><span>FDA approves emergency 5-day contraceptive</span></a></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/14/peter-king-gz-mosques/">Somebody check with the National Weather Service to see whether Hell has frozen over.</a></span>The Fox weekend hosts said Obama was correct in standing for the Islamic center.</p><p><span><a href="http://polizeros.com/2010/08/15/hsbc-usa-in-money-laundering-probe/">If this happened in Mexico, we'd just say their system was totally corrupt, right?</a></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><blockquote><p><span>I am unaware of a single criminal prosecution of a high-level bank official today in either the subprime collapse or the now multiple instances of banks laundering drug money. This is a perversion of democracy and justice.</span></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/linden-tax-chart/"><b>Here's something I bet you didn't know</b>.</a></p><blockquote><p><span>If we let the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest two percent of Americans expire at the end of this year as scheduled, everyone still gets a tax cut. Yes, everyone.</span></p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/13/hannitys_white_supremacist_pal_convicted_of_threatening_to_murder_three_federal_judges.php">Hannity's</a><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/08/13/hannitys_white_supremacist_pal_convicted_of_threatening_to_murder_three_federal_judges.php">&nbsp;White Supremacist Pal Convicted Of Threatening To Murder Three Federal Judges</a></span></p><p></p><p></p><span><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/aug/04/sarah-palin/sarah-palin-said-democrats-planning-largest-tax/">Wouldn't it be less time consuming to report when Palin tells the truth rather than when she tells lies?</a></span><blockquote>"Democrats are poised now to cause this largest tax increase in U.S. history."</blockquote><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/aug/04/sarah-palin/sarah-palin-said-democrats-planning-largest-tax/">Reagan raised taxes higher than the real Dem plan</a><p><br /></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/fox-news-ignores-schlessinger/">Aha... that's the Fox we know&nbsp;</a></span>Number of mentions on Fox of &nbsp;Dr. Laura Schlessinger's racist rant: ZERO</p><p><span><a href="http://www.politicususa.com/en/palin-hate-speech">Of course, this doesn't fit the narrative, so the MSM will ignore it</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Forty different Catholic, evangelical, mainline Protestant, Jewish and Muslim leaders and scholars came together to release a statement condemning the hate language of Fox News, Sarah Palin, and Newt Gingrich as it relates to the so called Ground Zero mosque, "Fear-mongering and hateful rhetoric only undermine treasured values at the heart of diverse faith traditions and our nation's highest ideals."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/cal-thomas-marriage-slavery/">Wingnut columnist calls Prop. 8 judge a 'false god,' compares same-sex marriage to slavery.&nbsp;</a></span>Cal Thomas? &nbsp;Really? &nbsp;I thought he was dead.</p><p><span><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/08/the-gitmo-farce.html">I have to agree with Sullivan on the Gitmo Farce:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The injustice, hypocrisy and bizarre paranoia continue under this president, as if almost nothing has changed since Bush.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025178.php">Eric Cantor continues to be a classic example of a post turtle</a></span></p><blockquote><p>-- you know he didn't get up there by himself; he obviously doesn't belong up there; he can't get anything done while he's there; and you just want to help the poor, dumb thing down.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/08/12/are_republicans_becoming_a_regional_party.html">The GOP is increasingly a regional party</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"The GOP has a HUGE generic-ballot edge in the South (52%-31%), but it doesn't lead anywhere else. In the Northeast, Dems have a 55%-30% edge; in the Midwest, they lead 49%-38%; and in the West, it's 44%-43%."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/10/25-americans-terrorism-traffic/">Just 25 Americans Died As A Result Of Terrorism Last Year -- Less Than Traffic Accidents, The Flu, Or Dog Bites</a>&nbsp;</span>What? &nbsp;But the wingnuts said Obama was weakening us, that he was handing us over to "them," that we were all doomed for having voted him in. &nbsp;Reckon they carry on about how Obama has kept us safe? &nbsp;Nah, me neither.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/10/scientists-bp-gag/">The DOJ and BP work very hard at keeping us all ignorant of the mega-spill's effects.&nbsp;</a></span>I have to wonder why....</p><p><span><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/aug/04/randy-neugebauer/lawmaker-claims-democrats-want-hit-small-businesse/">Yet another outrageous GOP lie:&nbsp;</a></span>"Ninety-four percent of small businesses will face higher taxes under the Democrats' plan."</p><p><span><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40937.html#ixzz0wIbezInH">More Republican kink</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Ben Quayle, the son of former Vice President Dan Quayle and an Arizona GOP congressional candidate, denied, then admitted to posting on DirtyScottsdale.com, "a website devoted to chronicling the trashy side of the Scottsdale nightclub scene." Quayle first told Politico that he "was not involved in the site," only to say hours later he did, in fact, post comments there.</p></blockquote><p>Being a Republican, this will not hurt him. &nbsp;Hell, the whoremonger in diapers still has his seat in Congress and seems likely to be re-elected. To top it off, this "dirty" playboy had a campaign ad meant to bolster his family values cred in which&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/04/quayle-family-girls/">he posed with two little girls that are&nbsp;</a><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/04/quayle-family-girls/">not&nbsp;</a></span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/04/quayle-family-girls/">his daughters</a>. &nbsp;By the way,<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/11/ben-quayle-calls-obama-wo_n_678503.html">&nbsp;Ben's as dim as his old man:</a></p><blockquote><p>"Obama is the worst president in history. And my generation will inherit a weakened country.&nbsp;Drug cartels in Mexico, tax cartels in D.C..What's happened to America? Somebody has to go&nbsp;to Washington and knock the hell out of the place."</p></blockquote><p>Note to Ben Q: &nbsp;1) Mexican drug cartels have been around for several decades and have been very powerful since the '90s, so you're attempt to pin them on Obama proves you're either ignorant or dishonest; 2) &nbsp;the tax cartels in DC are the source of much, if not most, of your party's funding; and 3) a guy with tissue-esque musculature and pencil-thin arms (check the mirror) look downright silly saying they'll "knock the hell" out of anyone of anyone other than octogenarians and toddlers. &nbsp;P.S., nightclub-hopping players posing with other people's little girls is pretty creepy. &nbsp;Terrific&nbsp;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRHa55CmGwk&amp;feature=player_embedded">parody video</a>here.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/sanford-stimulus-jobless-benefits/">Hypocrisy watch</a></span>&nbsp;Anti-Stimulus Crusader Mark Sanford Quietly Accepts Funds He Pledged To Reject</p><p><span><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jul/21/russell-pearce/immigration-law-author-claims-60-percent-arizona-h/">Yet another outrageous GOP lie:&nbsp;</a></span>"Sixty percent of the Hispanics" support the Arizona immigration law</p><p><span><a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/victory_to_the_wonks.php">Why I prefer political scientists over political pundits</a></span></p><blockquote><p>... as Sabato notes, for all this year's turbulence, 98.5 percent of House and Senate incumbents seeking another term have been renominated.</p><p>"I think what is remarkable is that, despite the tea party and a bad economy, the vast majority of incumbents are having little trouble winning," Sabato said.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/tracking-your-every-move">How Big Brother is tracking you (and it's ain't the gub'ment)</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/reproductive-freedom/defending-rights-pregnant-women">Sometimes, out courts have to deal with abject stupidity</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Pregnant women can now breathe a little easier. Yesterday, a Florida appeals court held (PDF) that a lower court was wrong to order a woman confined to her hospital bed, against her will, for up to four months, because she disagreed with her doctor's recommended course of treatment for pregnancy complications.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/rachel-maddow-exposing-private-prison-indu">Rachel Maddow: Exposing Private Prison Industry Role in Shaping Arizona's Anti-Immigration Law.</a></span>&nbsp;Damn, but those GOPers in Arizona pile the corruption high!</p><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/random-book-blogging-gary-north-aids-ron-paul-and-christian-reconstructionism">How does anyone get insane enough to write this in a book?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>God is plowing up the modern world. This is softening the Establishment's resistance to many new ideas and movement, among which Christian Reconstruction is barely visible at present. This is good for us now; we need the noise of contemporary events to hide us from humanist enemies who, if they fully understood the long-term threat to their civilization that our ideas post, would we wise to take steps to crush us.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/perry-education-injustice/">The governor of Texas keeps proving himself a moron without ethics</a></span>&nbsp;Perry Calls Congress' Insistence That He Spend Federal Education Money On Education An 'Injustice'</p><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0NKMwLBNnk&amp;feature=player_embedded">Great video on net neutrality, Google and Verizon</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/big-oil-insecurity/">Big Oil's Long History Of Compromising National Security For Profit</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/research_desk_evaluates_how_do.html">Legal immigration helps Social Security's finances but illegal immigration helps even more.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/pro-smog-senators/">Smoggy Senators Protest EPA Plan To Save Thousands Of Children's Lives</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/gitmo-rape/">Why is it so difficult for us to live up to our American ideals?&nbsp;</a></span><span>Gitmo judge admits confession extracted by threatening a child with death by gang rape.</span>&nbsp;The answer: &nbsp;Fear and weakness. &nbsp;Scratch the surface of any assault on liberty and you find a fetid cesspool of cowardice.</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/08/the_bachmann-ization_of_americ.html">The Right's violent rhetoric continues</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/11/republicans-wall-street/">But of course.</a></span>&nbsp;Republicans' Corporate Backscratching Earns Them Huge Boost In Wall Street Donations. The GOP is the best party money can buy.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/13/unemployed-man-gingrich/">Unemployed Man Reacts To Gingrich's Accusation That 'Welfare' Is Making Him Lazy: I Paid Into It For 35 Years</a></span></p><span><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/in_one_missouri_primary_assault_accusations_follow.php?ref=fpi">What's a primary election without beatings, guns, adultery, racism, obscene gestures, forced stripping, hidden wires, porn lobbyists, alleged sexual assaults, homo-erotic threats, misogyny, &nbsp;adolescent machismo and death threats?</a></span>&nbsp;Ah...good times, good times....<br /><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2010/08/alabama_ag_sues_bp_others_over_gulf_oil_spill.php?ref=fpa">But Obama's criticism of BP was "unAmerican"</a></span>? &nbsp;Alabama AG Sues BP, Transocean Over Gulf oil Spill. &nbsp;Rand Paul plz refudiate.<br /><span><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/social_conservative_bryan_fischer_paterson_wants_t.php?ref=fpb">The reckless radicals killing the Right&nbsp;</a></span>Bryan Fischer: Gov. Paterson Wants To Impose Sharia Law On NY. &nbsp;The childish, dishonest, transparent moments of Chicken Little's Theater of the Absurd simply strip away any last hint of credibility.<p><br /></p><p><span><a href="http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=1057">The legacy of our infotainment MSM:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>According to a new Pew Research poll, only one-third of Americans know that the Troubled Asset Relief Program was passed under President George W. Bush. Almost half (47 percent) responded that TARP was passed under President Obama, and 19 percent admitted they did not know who was president when it passed.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/gop-candidate-concentration-camps/">GOP candidate wants to build concentration camps</a></span>&nbsp;(the kind for which Reagan officially apologized?)</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/haley-jobs-plan/">Maybe she screwed that blogger and maybe she didn't -- but she's sure going to screw the people of South Carolina</a>&nbsp;</span>Huge tax breaks for big corporations, zero tax breaks for small businesses and a new sales tax on groceries.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/12/insurers-profits-regs/">Our corporate masters at play</a></span>&nbsp;Health insurers are lobbying to weaken regulations, despite record profits.</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/colbert-on-newt-revelations-his-philosophy-is-do-as-i-say-not-who-i-do-video.php?ref=fpc">Colbert points out Newt's "family values" hypocrisy</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/jon-stewart-slams-right-wingers-ground-zer">Jon Stewart demonstrates that it doesn't matter how far you are from Ground Zero, the fear mongers are protesting.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/top_social_conservative_defends_his_no_more_mosque.php?ref=fpc">What do you get when you mix hateful bigotry and abject stupidity?</a></span>&nbsp;Right-Winger Tells TPM:&nbsp;All Mosques Are Terror Threats. &nbsp;This ass also wants to&nbsp;<a href="http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147493343">kick all Muslims out of the country</a>. &nbsp;Where does he go to get fitted for a bedsheet and pointy hat? &nbsp;The comedic kicker: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/08/feed_them_to_the_lions.php?ref=fpblg">He doesn't understand his own religion</a>&nbsp;either!</p><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/08/a_few_articles_on_the.php#more?ref=fpblg">The mindset of the radically anti-mosque crowd</a></span></p><blockquote><p>We are engaged in a half-racial holy war against Islam. It's not us versus a series of interconnected terrorist networks which are relatively small but episodically quite lethal. It's us, the white Christians and our Jewish junior partner sidekicks versus the brown Muslim people.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/bush-on-ryans-roadmap-you-dont-get-steak----ever.php?ref=fpc">Is Jeb Bush the only GOP headliner who is willing to point out how stupid Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) is?</a></span></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The swamped by &quot;stoopid&quot; edition</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/the-swamped-by-stoopid-edition.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.347355</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-10T18:20:54Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-10T18:26:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Radical Reckless Right continues to kill that side of the spectrumPut aside the fact that this is a spectacularly stupid idea that could only be supported by economic illiterates. That hardly matters, because the cosponsors admit they have no...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7325" label="Arizona" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20995" label="bigot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5940" label="bigotry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48716" label="Breitbart" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7171" label="hypocrisy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="123" label="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49114" label="mosque" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7354" label="MSM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20375" label="Newt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5388" label="Republican" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/bonfire-public-opinion">The Radical Reckless Right continues to kill that side of the spectrum</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Put aside the fact that this is a spectacularly stupid idea that could only be supported by economic illiterates. That hardly matters, because the cosponsors admit they have no chance of passing it anyway. They just want some publicity.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008090037">Another fine example:</a></p><blockquote><p>A frequent contributor to Andrew Breitbart's websites said he believes that the September 11 attacks and the Oklahoma City bombing were inside jobs, and suggested he'll feel "comfort" when President Obama is killed.</p></blockquote><p>The blogger was one of the stars of TV's&nbsp;<span>Law and Order</span>&nbsp;show.</p></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><span><a href="http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/08/politifact-doesnt-seem-to-understand.html">Quite True</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"Words don't mean anything to Governor Palin,"-- Ian Lazaran, Conservatives4Palin.com.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/08/bin-laden-vs-the-cordoba-mosque-ctd.html">A new study shows mosques deter terrorism</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=can-money-buy-happiness">Can't buy me love</a></span></p><blockquote><p>...a new set of studies that reveal yet another toll that money takes. An international team of researchers ... report in the August 2010 issue of Psychological Science that, although wealth may grant us opportunities to purchase many things, it simultaneously impairs our ability to enjoy those things.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/opinion/09krugman.html?src=twt&amp;twt=NytimesKrugman">'Cuz being stoopid is sooooo kewel!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Our long-term structural unemployment crisis and the long-term decline, indeed decay, of our public infrastructure are screaming for a joint solution. Put people to work rebuilding, repairing and maintaining the public infrastructure. We're not just talking roads, bridges and other transportation systems. It includes schools, teachers, public health, parks, and a whole array of public services we've intentionally neglected.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=JefAuto.xml&amp;images=images/modeng&amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;tag=public&amp;part=5&amp;division=div2">Thomas Jefferson on Islam and religious freedom</a></span>:</p><blockquote><p>Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word 'Jesus Christ,' so that it should read 'a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.' The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and&nbsp;<span>Mahometan</span>, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination." (emphasis added)</p></blockquote><p>It's from his autobiography.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/16/AR2010071602855.html">The rhetoric:&nbsp;</a></span>since President Barack Obama's inauguration, Glenn Beck has made:</p><blockquote><p>... 202 mentions of Nazis or Nazism... 147 mentions of Hitler, 193 mentions of fascism or fascist, and another 24 bonus mentions of Joseph Goebbels. &nbsp;Most of these were directed in some form at Obama - as were the majority of the 802 mentions of socialist or socialism on Beck's nightly "report."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/tngopcampaignvideo080510">Tennessee GOP candidate promotes anti-Semitic video</a>&nbsp;</span>Because bigotry is all they have left</p><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/gingrich-knows-right-will-never-hold-him-accountable-his-hypocrisy">Astounding hypocrisy watch&nbsp;</a></span>All about "Family Values" guy Newt Gingrich and his screwing around on his wives (plural), but my favorite part is when he wants to keep his wife and his sex toy, then admits the Right will never hold him accountable for his rank hypocrisy:</p><blockquote><p>He asked her to just tolerate the affair, an offer she refused.</p><p>He'd just returned from Erie, Pennsylvania, where he'd given a speech full of high sentiments about compassion and family values.</p><p>The next night, they sat talking out on their back patio in Georgia. She said, "How do you give that speech and do what you're doing?"</p><p>"It doesn't matter what I do," he answered. "People need to hear what I have to say. There's no one else who can say what I can say. It doesn't matter what I live."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/3359214639.html">The World According to Wingnuts:&nbsp;</a></span>If you don't oppose the construction of the "Ground Zero Mosque," you are guilty of treason.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/operation-save-america-takes-anti-islam-ideology-its-logical-conclusion">Any time you use the words "Jesus hates" and call children "murderers" you're on thin ice</a></span></p><blockquote><p>About a dozen right-wing Christians, carrying placards and yelling "Islam is a lie," angrily confronted worshippers outside a Fairfield Avenue mosque Friday.</p><p>"Jesus hates Muslims," they screamed at worshippers arriving at the Masjid An-Noor mosque to prepare for the holy week of Ramadan. One protester shoved a placard at a group of young children leaving the mosque. "Murderers," he shouted.</p><p>Police arrived on the scene to separate the groups, but said no arrests were made.</p><p>Flip Benham, of Dallas, Texas, organizer of the protest, was yelling at the worshipers with a bullhorn.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>"This is a war in America and we are taking it to the mosques around the country," he said.</p></blockquote><p>Anybody but me&nbsp;<a href="http://www.kididdles.com/lyrics/j007.html">remember this from Sunday School</a>?</p><blockquote><p>Jesus loves the little children</p><p>All the children of the world</p><p>Black and yellow, red and white</p><p>They're all precious in His sight</p><p>Jesus loves the little children of the world</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2010/08/ny-sen-ruben-diaz-same-sex-marriage.html">Outrageously stupid Dem alert!</a></span>&nbsp;NY Sen. Ruben Diaz: Same-Sex Marriage Will Bring The End Of The World</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/piss_off_wingnu.html">It's worth mentioning that there were Muslim prayer ceremonies INSIDE the Pentagon after 9/11</a></span>. You know, the building that was also struck by a hijacked airplane on that day.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/more_like_this_19.html">My new hero, too.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/worst_person_in_10.html">You'd think an impotent, drug-crippled man who, with several of his male companions, hauled an entire refill&nbsp;suspiciously acquired Viagra to the Dominican Republic, notorious for its sex tourism, would avoid calling out anyone for their vacations.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/gibbs_clarifies.html">Just a few things the MSM narrative seems to overlook:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>But in 17 months, we have seen Wall Street reform, historic health care reform, fair pay for women, a recovery act that pulled us back from a depression and got our economy moving again, record investments in clean energy that are creating jobs, student loan reforms so families can afford college, a weapons system canceled that the Pentagon didn't want, reset our relationship with the world and negotiated a nuclear weapons treaty that gets us closer to a world without fear of these weapons, just to name a few. And at the end of this month, 90,000 troops will have left Iraq and our combat mission will come to an end.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008090034">An excellent series of videos in which Beck's "Faith 101" bullsh*t is taken down</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/2010/08/rancher-shot-nun-killed-in-crash-2-people-burned-to-death.html">How Arizona's MSM plays the race and immigration cards</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/08/the-unique-quality-of-lifelong-heterosexual-monogamy.html">A good start toward rationality</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Ross is at his most Catholic today in his column on marriage equality, and I'd like to start a response by saying that he has conceded many secular points: that the life-long, monogamous heterosexual nuclear family is not natural and it is not the default definition of marriage in world history. Abandoning these defunct arguments - defunct because they are transparently untrue - is a helpful throat-clearing for which I'm most grateful.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/conservapedia_founder_takes_on_the_notorious_liber.php?ref=fpa">The ultimate in anti-intellectual cred on the Right&nbsp;</a></span>Conservapedia Founder Andy Schlafly Has Found Another Liberal Plot: Einstein's Theory Of Relativity. &nbsp;<span>'Cuz being stoopid is sooooo kewel!</span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.onlinesentinel.com/opinion/letters/Why-is-creation-any-less-of-a-theory-than-evolution.html">The ultimate example of anti-intellectualism on the Right:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>He considers evolution a science that should be taught because evolution is "scientifically proven." OK, show me one human being conceived, carried and delivered by apes. What? Can't do it? Then I guess you can't prove it, eh?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/research_desk_tallies_how_expe.html">How expensive is welfare?</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/angle-theres-nothing-wrong-with-our-health-care-system-video.php?ref=fpb">"There's nothing wrong with our health care system"</a></span>&nbsp;-- so says the GOP's Nevada candidate for Senate. &nbsp;<span>'Cuz being stoopid is sooooo kewel!&nbsp;</span>That must be why Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Dubya and Obama all tried to do something about fixing it.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2010/08/high_response_saves_2010_census_16b_in_costs_1.php?ref=fpa">Wingnut fail&nbsp;</a></span>The Census got such a terrific response rate, it saved $1.6 billion. &nbsp;Erickson/Bachmann/Beck/Paul/Etc. are as impotent as they seem.</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/08/column_the_anti-business_presi.html">The anti-business president's pro-business recovery</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/04/1760058/keeping-faith-losing-religion.html">What she said</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"In the name of Christ,'' she wrote, "I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life.''</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/wingnut_plot_to.html">A wingnut Yahoo Group called "Digg Patriots" has been evidently "burying" certain liberal blogs on the social media site Digg.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/nationalsecurity/2010/08/terrorism-in-2009.html">What does this tell us?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>There were just 25 U.S. noncombatant fatalities from terrorism worldwide. (The US government definition of terrorism excludes attacks on U.S. military personnel). While we don't have the figures at hand, undoubtedly more American citizens died overseas from traffic accidents or intestinal illnesses than from terrorism.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/08/10/internet-schminternet/">Our corporate masters kill the open Net</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/maes-bike-plot/">Bike riding programs are an international threat to our freedoms!&nbsp;</a></span><span>'Cuz being stoopid is sooooo kewel!</span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/limbaugh_endors.html">It's treason. And it worked out so well 150 years ago.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/wall-street-journal-editorial-page-outdoes-itself">The Wall Street Journal op-ed page is certifiably&nbsp;without credibility</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/florida-antihcr-brief/">Health insurance reform is unconstitutional because it gives the states too much Medicaid money.&nbsp;</a></span>WTF?</p><blockquote><p>Setting aside the wealth of constitutional law rejecting the governors and attorneys general's position, it's also somewhat baffling why they would want to make this argument in the first place. &nbsp;Taken to its logical end, the state officials' argument would render generous grants from the federal government to the states unconstitutional. &nbsp;One marvels at how state leaders can believe that they are serving their constituents by trying to drain money out of their own budgets.</p></blockquote><p><span>'Cuz being stoopid is sooooo kewel!</span></p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/celebrity-sarah-palin-confronted-citizen-h">Apparently Bible Spice can't even record her new reality show without some of those darned liberal activists in Alaska mucking up the works for her.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Strange. The Palin's fishing business doesn't include IFQ's (Individual Fishing Quotas) necessary for commercially harvesting halibut. Her baiting hooks and keeping a manicure is laughable. Halibut are on the bottom of the ocean, hard to watch them "take the bait"...</p><p>he said she wanted Palin to know how she felt, but never dreamed she'd get the chance to say to her face, "You're not a leader, you're a climber!" Early in the conversation, Sarah actually winked at Kathleen in what seemed to be a case of eyelid Tourette's Syndrome.</p></blockquote><p><span></span>This one made me laugh until the end when one of Palin's private thugs trespassed on the lady's yard and torn the &nbsp;lady's protest sign off her own building. &nbsp;Andrew Sullivan&nbsp;<a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/08/the-desperation-of-the-palinites.html">notes the fallout as the Palin supporters get desperate</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The post is from Gateway pundit, not exactly a blog to rely on for facts. He also gives a little hint of what life would be like in a Palin presidency. A simple sign protesting Palin's delinquency and incompetence in her months of governing Alaska - "Worst Governor Ever" - is regarded by the blog as "rude and aggressive". Being rude to public figures? We can't have that, can we? Note: no Hitler mustache, no references to the Holocaust, no equation with Stalin, just "Worst Governor Ever". But then it gets funnier....</p><p>Yes, we all know that those of us who think this person is an unbalanced, unserious farce of a candidate for national office really loathe her for rearing and giving a home to a child with Down Syndrome, instead of killing him. Yes, that's what it is....</p><p>I don't think even Pelosi/Manilow-level Botox prevents people from rolling their eyes. But nice try, Sarah.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://chuckcurrie.blogs.com/chuck_currie/2010/08/study-poor-are-more-charitable-than-the-wealthy-a-good-reflection-on-luke-21.html">Study: Poor Are More Charitable Than The Wealthy</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/fehrenbach-palm/">They're booting&nbsp;</a></span><span><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/fehrenbach-palm/">THIS</a></span></span><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/fehrenbach-palm/">&nbsp;guy out for being gay?</a></span>&nbsp;<span><span>THIS</span></span>&nbsp;guy:</p><blockquote><p>Fehrenbach defended America's skies in the days after 9/11, and flew combat missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, for which he won the Air Medal for heroism. He has logged over 2,000 hours in the air, over 1,400 of those in fighters, and over 400 of those in combat.</p></blockquote><p>Now, there are powerful legal and moral arguments about kicking out anyone for sexual orientation but this case proves the policy is just plain dangerously stupid.</p><p><span><a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/entries/palin-obama-">Supremely Stoopid Quote of the Day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"Obama's in over his head. And I think he has poor advisers around him. &nbsp;Some of this is&nbsp;a result of he not having much experience and then a complicit media and maybe some&nbsp;voters who chose to not to allow him to be vetted very closely."&nbsp;&nbsp;-- &nbsp;Sarah Palin</p></blockquote><p>Looking past, for just a moment, the knee-slapping, side-splitting ironic humor of Palin ever uttering a thought about someone being poorly vetted and in over his or her head, I just have to ask: &nbsp;<span>How</span>, exactly, did "some voters&nbsp;<span>chose</span>" to stop Obama from being "vetted very closely"? &nbsp;My God. &nbsp;Sarah Palin is too stupid to be elected class president of the 6th grade.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/immigration/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/07/29/sandoval_children_look_hispanic">Arizona is 100% safe for Hispanics who can pass for white</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Nevada Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Sandoval (R-NV), who is Hispanic, told the Spanish-language news channel Univision that he supported Arizona's controversial immigration law. The reporter asked how he would feel if his own children were stopped under the new law, to which Sandoval replied that his children "don't look Hispanic."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/mccollum-gay-adoption/">GOP candidate for governor in Florida says he wants to ban gays from being foster care parents</a></span>&nbsp;<span>'Cuz being stoopid AND a bigot&nbsp;</span><span>is sooooo kewel!</span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/border-bill-schumer/">Stupid pandering Dems alert!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Last week, Democrats introduced a $600 million border security bill that was passed under unanimous consent -- reportedly, much to their surprise. The legislation includes $176 million for 1,000 new Border Patrol agents, $89 million for 500 additional customs and immigration personnel, $32 million to deploy drones, and $196 million for the Justice Department's work along the border.</p></blockquote><p>Focusing on the border will probably make the problem worse.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=queer-notions-how-christian-homopho-2010-08-09">Queer notions: "How Christian homophobes misuse my 'gay gene' report</a>"</span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40706.html#ixzz0vpplv9mZ">Another Birther nut heard from</a>&nbsp;</span>I suppose you can get away with this in a traditionally Republican district with a black population of only 8%.</p><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008100007">In MSM-think, is it silly for Obama to be a Democrat because that just invites criticism from the Faux news gang</a>?</span></p><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008100014">Only the idiots don't laugh at this</a></span>&nbsp;NewsBusters uncovers "chilling" fact about NYC mosque: It's shaped like a building</p><p><span><a href="http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-president-obama-target-game-20100804,0,5344153.story">"It wasn't meant to be him."&nbsp;</a></span>Carnival attraction challenged players to "shoot" a black man holding 'Health Bill' and wearing the presidential seal. These asses, pretending to be killing the president, are actually killing the Right.</p><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008090062">Oops! &nbsp;Fox reporter slaps down Beck's lie about First Lady's trip</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201008100005">Never let facts get in the way!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Despite the fact that data shows federal enforcement efforts are up and illegal immigration is down, an August 9 Washington Times editorial falsely claimed that the "Obama administration stubbornly refuses to protect America's borders."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/09/pawlenty-estate-tax/">A failure of math, economics, fairness, logic and morality:&nbsp;</a></span>Seconds After Calling For Entitlement Cuts, Pawlenty Endorses Billions In Tax Cuts For Wealthy Heirs. He also says that Minnesota should consider&nbsp;<a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/62620/pawlenty-minnesota-should-consider-switch-to-english-only">making English the official language and making the state English-only</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;<span>Warning: Do not try this at home! &nbsp;Pawlenty is a trained failure professional.</span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/06/chaplains-argument-gone/">Anti-gay chaplains are bearing&nbsp;</a><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/06/chaplains-argument-gone/">false</a><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/06/chaplains-argument-gone/">&nbsp;witness</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/08/8063.html">A quiz on terrorism</a></span></p><blockquote><p>1. Who made the following statement? "To watch the courageous Afghan freedom fighters battle modern arsenals with simple hand-held weapons is an inspiration to those who love freedom."</p><p>2. Which official report stated the following? "the Iraq War has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists...and is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives."</p><p>3. Approximately how many North Vietnamese civilians were killed by the US's three-and-a-half years Operation Rolling Thunder bombing campaign?</p><p>4. True or False: Studies have repeatedly found that the bulk of terrorists are normal.</p><p>5. How many suicide bombings had Iraq experienced before the 2003 US invasion?</p><p>6. In 1958, according to the United States National Security Council, what was the main reason the Arab people hated the US?</p><p>7. Who stated the following to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in 2005? "Our [the US's] policies in the Middle East fuel Islamic resentment."</p><p>8. Who said the following? "Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and peoples [in the Middle East]."</p><p>9. True or False: Revenge is an important cause of terrorism.</p><p>10. What was the main objective of al-Qaeda for the 9/11 attacks?</p><p>11. True or False: Over 20% of the respondents of a 2005 Gallup poll of ten predominantly Muslim countries felt the 9/11 attacks were fully justified.</p><p>12. True or False: Of the seventy-nine worst al-Qa'ida and other Salafi terrorists, more had attended madrasas than regular universities.</p><p>13. True or False: The majority of terrorists come from the lower-classes.</p><p>14. Which groups committed the following terrorist acts in Palestine to further nationalist goals?</p><p>15. If a terrorist act can be linked to a country or group should that preclude diplomacy with that country or group?</p><p>16. True or False: The internationally respected Goldstone Report accused Israel of terrorizing Gaza's civilians during the December 2008 Gaza invasion.</p><p>17. True or False: The religion of Islam is an important cause of terrorism.</p><p>18. Which Middle Eastern country suffered an 18 October 2009 Baluchi terrorist attack that killed dozens and that was condemned by the US?</p><p>19. What are the Annual Risks for an American to die from: Heart disease? Criminal homicide? Lightning strike? Terrorism?</p><p>20. Has Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad ever deliberately attacked American targets?</p><p>21. True or False: A majority of the people in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates support al-Qa'ida's goal of creating an Islamic state.</p><p>22. True or False: In 1997 a declassified CIA training manual detailed torture methods used against suspected subversives in Central America during the 1980s.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/08/mosque-building-and-gay-marriage-vs-mob-rule-by-the-right.html">Prejudice, minority rights and the Constitution</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The right wing argues that Muslims and gays should give up their rights in deference to the moral sensibilities and emotional sensitivities of the majority. This is called a 'tyranny of the majority' and it is an evil of which Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and the other Founding Generation of Americans were&nbsp;<a href="http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm">well aware</a>.</p></blockquote><p>This is one of the great hypocrisies of Wingnutopia: &nbsp;they are for democratic majorities when it suits their anti-minority rights purposes, but all about "we're not a democracy!" the rest of the time.</p><p><span><a href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/">Retraction Watch,</a></span>&nbsp;a new blog that should be required reading for anyone interested in scientific journalism or the issue of accuracy.</p><p><span><a href="http://polizeros.com/2010/08/09/the-petraeus-propaganda-tour-who-supports-the-troops/">If we knew what they know, we wouldn't be in Afghanistan right now. It's time to support the troops.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/bending-the-curve/">Why deficit hawks should love the Affordable Care Act "Obamacare").</a>&nbsp;</span>As Matt Y says:&nbsp;Deficit hawks don't love the Affordable Care Act because "deficit hawks" are generally just orthodox conservatives playing pretend.</p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/paul-ryan-is-a-fraud/">Paul Ryan is a Fraud</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/saving-the-economy-reduced-the-deficit/">Go tell your crazy uncle: Saving The Economy Reduced The Deficit</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/gop-fantasy-agenda-leaves-public-in-the-dark/">How many cuts would a wingnut make if a wingnut would make cuts?</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/08/reefer_madness.php?ref=fpblg">I suspect he inhaled</a></span></p><blockquote><p>....a female student from the time recounts to GQ the story of Paul and another member of the group kidnapping her, trying to force her to take hits on a bong, and eventually making her bow down in a creek and worship the false idol "Aqua Buddha."</p></blockquote><p>Paul camp threatens to sue&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/rand-paul-camp-planning-court-challenge-to-kidnapping-story.php?ref=fpb">BUT never says it ain't true!</a></p><p><span><a href="http://polizeros.com/2010/08/07/mexico-drug-war-blogs/">Blogs about the drug war in Mexico</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/boehner-on-amending-14th-amendment-worth-considering-video.php?ref=fpblg">So are they "</a><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/boehner-on-amending-14th-amendment-worth-considering-video.php?ref=fpblg">refudiating</a><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/boehner-on-amending-14th-amendment-worth-considering-video.php?ref=fpblg">" the amendment their own party created, pushed and passed just for the sake of pandering to bigots?</a></span></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>May God smite us with Rep. Paul Ryan&apos;s &quot;cancer&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/may-god-smite-us-with-rep-paul.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.346957</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-06T19:57:56Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-07T06:09:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ Progressivism is a "cancer" in America: &nbsp;so says Glenn Beck, and so agrees Rep. Paul Ryan, a Republican from Wisconsin. &nbsp;Ryan says his goal is to "indict the entire vision of progressivism" which he says is "a complete affront...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5941" label="cancer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9382" label="progressive" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8057" label="progressivism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49322" label="Ryan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[ <br /><span><p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201004120026"><b>Progressivism is a "cancer" in America</b></a><b>: </b>&nbsp;so says Glenn Beck, and so agrees Rep. Paul Ryan, a Republican from Wisconsin. &nbsp;Ryan says his goal is to "indict the entire vision of progressivism" which he says is "a complete affront of the whole idea of this country."</p><p>He says he wants to "flush out progressives" and that he knows about them because he grew up in Janesville, WI, "just 35 miles from Madison," as if progressivism is, and has been, some secret cult that he's now revealing to us and from which he must save us. He's on this&nbsp;<span>(<i>ahem</i>)&nbsp;</span>courageous mission "so people can actually see what this ideology means" and "how it attacks the American idea." &nbsp;Just how un-American is it? &nbsp;Ryan tells us that "this stuff came from the German intellectuals to Madison" and that the "Austrians" were its "founders."</p><p>In a speech he gave last January,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2010&amp;month=02">Ryan said</a></p><blockquote><p>....there was the Wisconsin Deal. In my home state, the University of Wisconsin was an early hotbed of progressivism, whose goal was to reorder society along lines other than those of the Constitution.</p></blockquote><p><span><b>Let us now count the ways in which Ryan is wrong.</b></span></p><b><br /></b></span>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span></span></p><p><b>1</b><span>.&nbsp;</span>Let's go first for the dumbest thing he tried to say. &nbsp;Germans! &nbsp;Austrians! &nbsp;Oh my! &nbsp;Progressivism (we're supposed to think)&nbsp;<i>must</i>&nbsp;be linked to that most famous of Austrians who was the most famous of German leaders -- Adolph Hitler!</p><p>Really, Paul, if you're going to try to frame an issue in such a way as to evoke a reflexive response -- in this case, linking progressivism to the nearly universal revulsion for Hitler -- you have to be less transparent. &nbsp;Subtlety in framing is especially important when you try to pair two entirely unrelated things, like progressivism and Nazism. &nbsp;The only people who would not giggle at this bit of silliness are those who either desperately want to believe there is such a connection (and so delude themselves) or who are stone-cold ignorant. &nbsp;(<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/dont-know-much-about-economics/">Stone-cold ignorant</a>&nbsp;is something with which Ryan is intimately familiar.)</p><p>By the way, not only were the Germans not the originators of progressivism, they were<a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/tp-036/?action=more_essay">&nbsp;rather late to the party</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Germans and organized labor, who had not supported the Progressive movement in its early years, became important later as the composition of the movement changed.</p></blockquote><p><b>2.&nbsp;</b>It was called the Wisconsin&nbsp;<i>Idea,</i> not the Wisconsin Deal. &nbsp;Cripes! Ya'd think ya'd know that growing up and "raising your family" in in da nort' here, eh. &nbsp;C'mere once. &nbsp;Let me explain.</p><p>And what was that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinidea.wisc.edu/">Wisconsin Idea?</a></p><blockquote><p>First attributed to UW President Charles Van Hise in 1904, the Wisconsin Idea is the principle that education should influence and improve people's lives beyond the university classroom.</p></blockquote><p>The notion that the egg-heads at state universities should do something to bring concrete benefits to people living outside of academia is&nbsp;<i>bad</i>&nbsp;in your book? &nbsp;That's&nbsp;<i>un-American</i>&nbsp;in your book? &nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinidea.wisc.edu/history.html">This&nbsp;</a>is an "affront to the whole idea of the country"?</p><blockquote><p>(A)s early as the 1880s, the university began summer Farmers' Institutes to introduce state farmers to new techniques and technology. These classes, along with research breakthroughs such as Stephen Babcock's butterfat milk test, helped a poor, struggling state move beyond its single-grain farming and establish itself as a national leader in dairy and other agricultural industries. During the latter part of the 19th century, the university began similar programs for teachers and engineers, all with the goal of leveraging university knowledge to improve the quality of life in Wisconsin.</p></blockquote><p>This "Wisconsin Idea" actually&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinidea.wisc.edu/history.html">predates political progressivism&nbsp;</a>by many years.</p><blockquote><p>As early as the 1870s, UW president John Bascom implored his students -- La Follette&nbsp;and Van Hise among them -- that they had a moral duty to share their expertise broadly.</p></blockquote><p>Were either John Bascom or Charles Van Hise "Germans" or "Austrians" who brought their horrifingly un-American ideas to Wisconsin?&nbsp;<a href="http://www.library.wisc.edu/etext/wireader/WER0748.html">Bascom was born in New York,</a>&nbsp;was educated in Massachusetts and died in Massachusetts. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/dictionary/index.asp?action=view&amp;term_id=1641&amp;term_type_id=1&amp;term_type_text=people&amp;letter=V">Van Hise</a>&nbsp;was born in Wisconsin, was educated in Wisconsin and died in Wisconsin (his mentor, by the way, was Roland Irving, who was born in New York, was educated in New York and died in Wisconsin).</p><p><b>3.&nbsp;</b>To assert that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/wlhba/articleView.asp?pg=1&amp;orderby=&amp;id=14305">progressivism</a>&nbsp;was created "to reorder society along lines other than those of the Constitution" is what, back in the day, we called a bald-faced lie.</p><blockquote><p>The progressive movement originated in the late nineties as a protest against railroad and machine dominance of Republican politics. &nbsp;In 1900, just 30 years ago, Robert M. La Follette lead it to its first victory.... La Follette characterized progressivism as a war against monopoly.</p></blockquote><p>Catch that? &nbsp;Progressivism was&nbsp;<i>created by Republicans</i>&nbsp;as a reaction to the corruption of other Republicans.</p><blockquote><p>The Republicans were the party of Lincoln and the Union Army, and in the decades following the Civil War, they held a virtual monopoly on state government by organizing and satisfying the needs of Civil War veterans. Until the 1890s, a few party leaders tightly controlled Wisconsin's legislative agenda. At the same time, the rise of big business after 1870 had concentrated economic power in the hands of a few privileged individuals. These two groups, party leaders and business leaders, often overlapped, personally and pragmatically, as the interests and actions of government and business converged.</p><p>Progressive Republicans, in contrast, believed that the business of government was to serve the people. They sought to restrict the power of corporations when it interfered with the needs of individual citizens. The Progressive Movement appealed to citizens who wanted honest government and moderate economic reforms that would expand democracy and improve public morality.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/tp-036/?action=more_essay">Progressivism applied the Wisconsin Idea</a>&nbsp;-- that smart people should share the fruits of their studies and intelligence with the rest of us -- to governance and sought the advice of academics on the problems of the day.</p><blockquote><p>The Wisconsin Idea, as it came to be called, was that efficient government required control of institutions by the voters rather than special interests, and that the involvement of specialists in law, economics, and social and natural sciences would produce the most effective government.</p></blockquote><p>One of the leading proponents was&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/dictionary/index.asp?action=view&amp;term_id=2471&amp;term_type_id=1&amp;term_type_text=people&amp;letter=C">John Commons</a>&nbsp;(born in Ohio, educated in Maryland and died in Florida -- so, also neither a German nor an Austrian):</p><blockquote><p>Commons ... believed in a theory of gradualness and democratic competition in the labor movement rather than class conflict and revolution. He refused to accept the easy generalizations of the Marxists....</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/tp-036/?action=more_essay">La Follette</a></p><blockquote><p>developed the techniques and ideas that made him a nationwide symbol of Progressive reform and made the state an emblem of progressive experimentation. The Wisconsin Idea, as it came to be called, was that efficient government required control of institutions by the voters rather than special interests, and that the involvement of specialists in law, economics, and social and natural sciences would produce the most effective government.</p></blockquote><p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nps.gov/archive/elro/glossary/progressive-era.htm">people of the progressive movement</a>&nbsp;(that predated its political expression):</p><blockquote><p>...were people who believed that the problems society faced (poverty, violence, greed, racism, class warfare) could best be addressed by providing good education, a safe environment, and an efficient workplace. Progressives lived mainly in the cities, were college educated, and believed that government could be a tool for change.</p><p>...They concentrated on exposing the evils of corporate greed, combating fear of immigrants, and urging Americans to think hard about what democracy meant. Other local leaders encouraged Americans to register to vote, fight political corruption, and let the voting public decide how issues should best be addressed (the initiative, the referendum, and the recall).</p></blockquote><p>A group of reporters, later called&nbsp;<a href="http://www.apstudynotes.org/us-history/outlines/chapter-29-progressivism-and-the-republican-roosevelt-1901-1912/">Muckrakers</a>, fueled the movement by revealing the dangerous conditions that threatened the nation at the time:</p><blockquote><p>Lincoln Steffens unmasked the corrupt alliance between big business and municipal government; Ida Tarbell published a devastating factual expose of the Standard Oil Company;&nbsp;Muckrakers roasted the beef trust, the "money trust," the railroad barons, and corrupt fortunes;&nbsp;Thomas Lawson, a speculator, laid bare the practices of his accomplices in "Frenzied Finance";&nbsp;David G. Phillips wrote The Treason of the Senate--senators represented companies not people.</p><p>The most effective fire of the muckrakers was directed at social evils--prostitution, slums, industrial accidents, subjugation of American blacks, and abuses of child labor.</p></blockquote><p>In summary, the progressives came together politically to fight monopolies, the political corruption of big business special interests and the ability of big business to crush the common folk, as well as to promote &nbsp;honesty, public morality, education, democracy and the use of smart, educated people to address the nation's problems. &nbsp;</p><p>And this is what Ryan is<span>&nbsp;against</span><i>?</i> &nbsp;So is Ryan saying he is:</p><ul><li>anti-intellectual;</li><li>pro-immorality,</li><li>pro-dishonesty;</li><li>pro-corruption;</li><li>pro-child labor;</li><li>pro-government run for and by big business;</li><li>pro-monoplies; and</li><li>anti-democracy?</li></ul><p>Um... OK. &nbsp;If that's what he wants to say about himself, who am I to argue? &nbsp;(I'm being facetious, of course, he'd never directly admit those things about himself out loud.)</p><p>Wisconsin's 1911 Legislature produced the biggest yield of progressive reforms, creating, among other things,&nbsp;the nation's first effective workers' compensation program to protect people injured on the job, laws to regulate factory safety and limits on child labor. &nbsp;They fought to give women the vote, to create "mothers pensions" and, eventually, led the fight to create Social Security.</p><p>And this is what Ryan is&nbsp;<i>against</i>?</p><p>So Ryan&nbsp;<i>favors&nbsp;</i>putting children back into unsafe factories and leaving the injured and disabled in those unsafe factories to suffer in poverty? &nbsp;Ryan is&nbsp;<i>against</i>&nbsp;women voting and senior citizens living above poverty?</p><p>Sure. &nbsp;Whatever he says.</p><p>Progressives were anything but the anti-Constitution radicals Ryan claims, drawing their first and main support from the middle class, including business people, clergy, doctors, teachers, lawyers, President Theodore Roosevelt and President William Howard Taft (both Republicans). &nbsp;Other notable progressives included steel magnate Andre Carnegie, Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, William James, Walter Lippman, John Mott, John D. Rockefeller Jr. and &nbsp;Upton Sinclair.</p><p><i>These&nbsp;</i>are the people Ryan must "flush out"? &nbsp;<i>These&nbsp;</i>are the people who embraced and promoted a "vision" that is "an affront to the whole idea of this country"? &nbsp;<i>These&nbsp;</i>are the people who germinated the "cancer" from which Ryan must save us?</p><p>Oh please.</p><p>Let's consider Taft (since he's in my family tree): the only person to ever be both President of the United States and Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court; US Secretary of War; acting Secretary of State; Governor-General of the Philippines; the youngest-ever Solicitor General of the United States; Governor of Cuba; one of the supervisors of the construction of the Panama Canal; judge on the 6th district US Court of Appeals; judge on the Ohio Supreme Court; Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and Legal History at Yale Law School; president&nbsp;of the American Bar Association; author of a series of books on American legal philosophy; chair of the National War Labor Board; founder of the League to Enforce Peace; an explorer of Alaska; and a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Yale.</p><p>Let's consider someone outside of politics.&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James">Williams James</a>: was a giant in psychology and philosophy (is often referred to as the father of American psychology); was fluent in three languages; earned an MD from Harvard; taught anatomy, physiology, psychology and philosophy at Harvard; and was a scientific explorer of the Amazon River. &nbsp; Although he gained his widest respect for his 1,200-page&nbsp;<i>Principles of Psychology, </i>a non-exhaustive bibliography of his writings consumes 47 pages. &nbsp;All this he did despite the &nbsp;lifelong obstacles of poor health and depression.</p><p>And Paul Ryan? &nbsp;He has a bachelor's degree from Miami of Ohio (which he paid for with Social Security benefits). &nbsp;He worked as a "marketing consultant" at his great grand daddy's construction firm, briefly tried to run his own consulting firm, and as an aide and/or speech writer to four politicians, two forgettable, two embarrassing. &nbsp;Oh, and he's the congressman from a sparsely populated and unremarkable district in a small Midwestern state. He's in his sixth term in Congress and has introduced just two bills that have passed. &nbsp;In other words, he's done next to nothing. &nbsp;(Someone less charitable -- say... someone with a show on Fox -- might point out that Ryan has been living on someone else's dime for most of his life: the tax payers [Social Security], family money and the tax payers again [Congressional salary]).</p><p>Paul Ryan is to the few progressive leaders listed above what bumper stickers are to philosophy. &nbsp;Comparing Paul Ryan's intellect, ability, accomplishments, sacrifices and contributions to the nation to the intellect, ability, accomplishments, sacrifices and contributions of these progressive leaders is akin to comparing a speck of sand to the Sahara Desert. &nbsp;Paul Ryan hasn't yet earned the right to pull the weeds on their graves, much less to speak so contemptuously of them and their vision.</p><p>Come to think of it, a lot of what the progressivism was created to combat is sounds really familiar.</p><p><a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/steven_rockford/2010/07/05/cheneys_energy_task_force">Big Oil screwing everyone?</a>&nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html">Senators owned by big business?&nbsp;</a>Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100722/BUSINESS01/7220332/BlueCross+stockpiles+surplus+cash+while+raising+premiums">Big biz walking all over us?&nbsp;</a>Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/05/AR2010080506991.html">Wealth amassing into the hands of a few?</a>&nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/a/m/americandad/2010/03/an-open-letter-to-conservative.php">Dishonesty in government</a>? &nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704548604575097883275530628.html">Monopolies?&nbsp;</a>Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-29/foreclosure-filings-rise-in-75-of-u-s-cities-as-joblessness-hurts-owners.html">Growing poverty</a>? &nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/us/10westvirginia.html">Unsafe working conditions?</a>&nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/opinion/31herbert.html?_r=3&amp;th&amp;emc=th">Bad conditions for working people?</a>&nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://www.metafilter.com/90411/Guilty-of-electronic-voting-fraud">Corruption in voting?</a>&nbsp;Check.</p><p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/strangling-middle-class-america/story?id=11325933">Middle class getting crushed?&nbsp;</a>Check.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/the-gop-plot-to-screw-the_b_662953.html">Double check.</a></p><p>So, yes, Mr. Ryan, please do "flush out" progressives and reveal what it is they were all about, because we could sure as hell use a whole bunch more of them right about now.</p></span><p></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>All the news that is fit to link</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/08/all-the-news-that-is-fit-to-li.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.346482</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-04T01:52:15Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-04T01:58:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[It seems Americans&nbsp;are concerned&nbsp;with effective -- not bigger or smaller -- governmentOh! &nbsp;But it's so "un-American" to speak ill of our corporate masters!The treatment of workers by American corporations has been worse -- far more treacherous -- than most of...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="20462" label="14th" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49318" label="Angle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7325" label="Arizona" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5940" label="bigotry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="44530" label="BP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="586" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49320" label="Ground" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7171" label="hypocrisy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2816" label="LGBT" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="46434" label="Paul" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8057" label="progressivism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49322" label="Ryan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26081" label="solar" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5145" label="tax" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32791" label="Zero" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/07/pdf/what_americans_want.pdf">It seems Americans&nbsp;</a><a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/07/pdf/what_americans_want.pdf">are concerned</a><a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/07/pdf/what_americans_want.pdf">&nbsp;with effective -- not bigger or smaller -- government</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/opinion/31herbert.html?_r=3&amp;th&amp;emc=th">Oh! &nbsp;But it's so "un-American" to speak ill of our corporate masters!</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The treatment of workers by American corporations has been worse -- far more treacherous -- than most of the population realizes. There was no need for so many men and women to be forced out of their jobs in the downturn known as the great recession.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/how-craven-beltway-village-wh-press">The painful weakness of the MSM</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/03/inglis-racism/">GOP member of congress hits back against GOP's anti-Obama racism and lies</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.igpub.com/changingthescript.html">Buy this book</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://scotteriology.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/the-pee-pee-miracle/">These people make me pray there IS a Hell.&nbsp;</a></span>Never mind the "pee pee miracle," they should burn for that hair and that beard.</p></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/health_insuranc_6.html">Here's an insurance policy from 1950-ish with a premium of only 90-cents a month -- and it totally covers "loss of eyes, hands and feet."</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/paul-ryans-strange-new-respect/">Yes, just like yesterday, Rep. Paul Ryan is still an idiot -- so why does he get so much praise?</a>&nbsp;</span>Here's Ryan kissing Beck's ass and agreeing with Beck that progressivism is a cancer -- and "blames" it on "German intellectuals" at the University of Wisconsin, which he knew about because he grew up in Janesville "just 35 miles from Madison." &nbsp;Skipping over the fact that progressivism started some X years before Ryan was born, let's jump right to the fact that<a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/tp-036/?action=more_essay">&nbsp;</a><span><a href="http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/turningpoints/tp-036/?action=more_essay">progressivism was a Republican creation made popular by a Republican governor of Wisconsin</a>.</span>&nbsp;<span></span>Kevin Drum&nbsp;<a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/dcs-love-affair-paul-ryan">takes him apart piece by vacuous piece:</a></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><blockquote><p><span>Another underappreciated aspect, and one that's fast becoming a pet peeve of mine, is that there's nothing "smart" or "brave" about it. For some reason, practically everyone talks about how Ryan is the only Republican in Congress who's willing to put his money where his mouth is and tell us exactly what he'd cut out of the federal budget. But he doesn't. His plan merely caps various kinds of spending: there's a cap on Medicare, a cap on Social Security, and a cap on domestic spending. Reduced to its policy essence, that's it.</span></p><p><span>This is the fourth grade version of a "plan." I can come up with something similar in about a minute. In fact, I will. Here's my "plan":</span></p><p><span>I think federal spending should be capped at 23% of GDP.</span></p><p><span>Interest on the national debt comes to 3% of GDP.</span></p><p><span>Social Security gets 5% of GDP.</span></p><p><span>Medicare gets 8% of GDP.</span></p><p><span>Defense spending gets 3% of GDP.</span></p><p><span>Domestic spending gets 4%.</span></p><p><span>Pretty good plan, huh? Of course I'd need to pad this out with lots of charts and tables, some quotes from famous people, and a policy proposal or two. Nothing damaging, mind you, mostly just things that hide the fact that I'm not really proposing any specific cuts, only offering a few broad spending caps and (natch) some tax cuts for the rich.</span></p><p><span>Oh, and his plan doesn't eliminate the deficit, either. Other than that, it's pretty good.</span></p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/the-bogus-mccaincoburn-campaign-against-waste-in-the-recovery-act/">Back in the day, McCain and Coburn would be called "liars"</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/raise_taxes_on.html">Americans say "Tax the rich!"</a></span></p></span><p></p><p></p><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/08/bob-inglis-tea-party-casualty">Just how crazy is it in Wingnutopia?&nbsp;</a></span>From a GOP member of Congress:</p><blockquote><p>I sat down, and they said on the back of your Social Security card, there's a number. That number indicates the bank that bought you when you were born based on a projection of your life's earnings, and you are collateral. We are all collateral for the banks. I have this look like, "What the heck are you talking about?" I'm trying to hide that look and look clueless. I figured clueless was better than argumentative. So they said, "You don't know this?! You are a member of Congress, and you don't know this?!" And I said, "Please forgive me. I'm just ignorant of these things." And then of course, it turned into something about the Federal Reserve and the Bilderbergers and all that stuff. And now you have the feeling of anti-Semitism here coming in, mixing in. Wow.</p></blockquote><p>This stuff is terrifying.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/splc-sues-new-orleans-school-after-student-handcuffed">Why are school officials so frequently so stupid?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Children at a New Orleans elementary school are subjected to unlawful seizures and arrests - including handcuffing and shackling - for minor violations of school rules, according to a SPLC lawsuit filed on behalf of a 6-year-old boy who was brutally handcuffed and shackled to a chair by a school security officer.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/then_again_raci.html">This is what it's all about for the tea party</a></span>.</p><blockquote><p>And they'll insist up and down that these ideas aren't racist -- that they're just about immigration, national security and government spending.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/gop-schedule/">Hypocrisy watch</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/liz-cheney-mosque/">In Wingnut World, freedom of religion is only freedom of MY religion</a>&nbsp;</span>Which brings up the question, "Why do Republicans hate George Washington?" &nbsp;In 1790, President Washington wrote a letter to the Jewish community of Newport, RI, affirming the values of tolerance and religious freedom that he saw as the bedrock of the country that he had had helped found and done so much to secure.&nbsp;<a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/debate-over-ground-zero-mosque-is-about-american-values/">The letter included this:</a></p><blockquote><p>All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection, should demean themselves as good citizens. [...]</p><p>May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/racism-sb1070-nazis/">Arizona seems to be about to "inherit the wind</a>"</span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/08/snapshot082010.html">Republicans are backing two dead horses</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/08/pencebot_is_a_s.html">Hypocrisy watch</a>&nbsp;</span>Self-declared "fiscal hawk" Mike Pence wants to continue spending $560 million a year on a military jet engine that no one, including the tea party and the Pentagon, wants.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=faith-and-foolishness">Faith and Foolishness: When Religious Beliefs Become Dangerous</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/paul-mine-safety/">Yes, today, Rand Paul is still an ass</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/freezing-out-press">Here is Senate candidate Sharron Angle accidentally telling the truth about why she only talks to Fox News</a></span>&nbsp;and other members of the right wing press:</p><blockquote><p>We wanted them to ask the questions we want to answer so that they report the news the way we want it to be reported and when I get on a show and I say send me money to SharronAngle.com, so that your listeners will know that if they want to support me they need to go to SharronAngle.com.</p></blockquote><p><span>H<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/03/mcconnell-disclose/">ypocrisy watch</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://blogs.state.gov/ap/index.php/site/entry/text_swat_to_50555_pakistani_flood_victims">How you can help the flood victims in Pakistan</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10770674">This will make the wingnuts' heads explode</a></span></p><blockquote><p>A warming climate could see millions of adult Mexicans migrate to the US as rising temperatures cause a drop in crop yields, according to a study by researchers at Princeton University.</p><p>For every 10% of lost crop yields in Mexico, another 2% of Mexicans are likely to leave their country, the study says.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://herescope.blogspot.com/2010/07/destiny-driven-dominionism.html">I guess he's lonely now that his 15 minutes of fame have expired</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Why is Rick Warren promoting an author who is so closely aligned with this destiny-driven mandate to take over the "spheres" of the world?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?_r=2">Four Deformations of the Apocalypse&nbsp;</a></span>Republicans, losing touch with who they once were, killed our economy -- so says Reagan's budget guy</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/texas-mosque-vandalized/">In case you needed a reminder that bigots are both vile and profoundly stupid</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFyhDnu7QXs&amp;feature=player_embedded">Not in my America!&nbsp;</a></span>Nice little video about Arizona's "show me your papers" law</p><p><span><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/danielschultz/3076/abe_foxman's_%22irrational_or_bigoted%22_positions/">The meaning of 9/11, whatever it is, is not us-versus-them, and no one is entitled to irrational bigotry</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/08/voices_from_brooklyn_racial_profilings_part_of_everyday_life_here.html">Of course, Arizona didn't invent racial profiling</a></span></p><blockquote><p>As progressives unite this summer to fight racial profiling of immigrants in Arizona, a New York Times investigation in July offered a stark reminder of how routine profiling has become in some black neighborhoods around the country. The Times reviewed data on stops over four years in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Brownsville, a predominantly African American community that's dense with public housing. Reporters found police made nearly 52,000 stops in an eight-block radius over just four years. Just 1 percent of the stops yielded arrests and cops found only 26 guns.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/08/environmental_racism_surfacing_in_bp_spill_waste_management.html">BP's Dumping Oil-Spill Waste in Communities of Color, Study Finds</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/huckleberry-shows-his-supremacist.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">A glimpse into the cold, dark abyss....</a></span></p><blockquote><p>I had missed Huckleberry Graham's specific language in his comments about repealing the 14th amendment. He said "they come here to drop a baby" as if they're farm animals. And he delivered it with his patented dead-eyed reptilian stare and sneering drawl.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/30/AR2010073002671.html">5 myths about Bush's aristocracy tax cuts</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2010/08/01/historic-report-solar-energy-costs-now-lower-than-nuclear-energy/">Solar power is now cheaper than nuclear power.&nbsp;</a></span>Can we get serious about now?</p><blockquote><p>A new report out of Duke University says that solar energy and nuclear energy have passed a "historic crossover," where decreasing solar energy costs and increasing nuclear energy costs have met, and then parted. Solar energy is now cheaper than nuclear energy and is getting increasingly cheaper every day</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/in-historic-move-hhs-encourages-lgbt-inclusive-sexual-education/">In Historic Move, HHS Encourages LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/rove-tax-fantasy/">Rove Invents Fantasy World In Which The Bush Tax Cuts Led To The Most Government Revenue Ever</a></span></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>News we should notice</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/news-we-should-notice.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.346129</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-01T03:44:24Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-01T03:48:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ The Wall Street Journal on the Bush tax cuts:&nbsp;allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire will hurt only those people earning more than $300,000 per year; keeping the Bush tax cuts will &nbsp;force people earning $60-150,000 to pay more.Only...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7325" label="Arizona" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48716" label="Breitbart" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="586" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17762" label="Gingrich" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[ <br /><span><p><span><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/na-bh188_taxes_ns_20100725185218.gif"><img title="NA-BH188_TAXES_NS_20100725185218" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/na-bh188_taxes_ns_20100725185218.gif?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="260" /></a><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704719104575389540592147682.html">The Wall Street Journal on the Bush tax cuts:</a></span>&nbsp;allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire will hurt only those people earning more than $300,000 per year; keeping the Bush tax cuts will &nbsp;force people earning $60-150,000 to pay more.</p><p><span><a href="http://congressionalconnection.nationaljournal.com/2010/07/despite-tough-climate-public-p.php">Only 30% want Bush's tax cuts to stay in place, including just half of Republicans.</a></span>&nbsp;What's more:</p><blockquote><p>Despite a tough year for President Obama, the public believes his administration's policies offer a better chance at improving the economy over the policies of his predecessor, former President George W. Bush. According to the latest Society for Human Resource Management/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, conducted with the Pew Research Center, 46 percent said Obama's path would do more to improve economic conditions in the next few years, compared to 29 percent who said policies put in place by Bush would.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/frank-wolf-on-stimulus/">When the facts don't suit the party line, the fact be damned</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Earlier this week, two leading economists released a study that "empirically proved" that the government's response to the Great Recession, including the stimulus bill, prevented the loss of "some 8½ million jobs." The study's authors -- former McCain economic adviser Mark Zandi and former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Blinder -- concluded that "there is little doubt that in total, the policy response was highly effective."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024970.php">The Obama administration's auto industry bailout not only worked, it exceeded expectations</a></span>. Another in a series of highly successful government interventions in the economy.</p><blockquote><p>"any honest reading of history suggests that the federal government has quite an impressive record of rescuing institutions considered too big to fail." Quite right. When the government bailed out Lockheed in 1971, the company thrived and taxpayers profited. The government bailed out Chrysler in 1980, and saw similar results. The government bailed out the railroad industry, and saw it flourish.</p><p>In each case, the government spent lots of taxpayer money, used bureaucrats to engineer the revival of an industry, recouped the money, and produced a success story. Conservatives howled in every instance, but as is usually the case, their complaints and dire predictions were wrong.</p></blockquote></span>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><span><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/go_anthony_wein.html">This man will one day be president</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38486714/ns/health/?ocid=twitter">Game over. &nbsp;We win.</a></span>&nbsp;Andy Griffith support Obama's health care reform.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/07/the-tony-hayward-exit-interview-i-became-a-villain-for-doing-the-right-thing.html">Weep for Tony.</a></span>&nbsp;BP's lame duck exec says he's been made a villain for (ahem) doing the right thing. &nbsp;If by "the right thing" you mean short-cutting on safety to save a few bucks and add a meager amount to already obscene profits and, in so doing, killing 11 people, countless sea animals, unleashing humankind's worst environmental disaster, smashing a fragile economy for millions along the coast, lying about it all, whining about how you'd like your life back and then yachting off into the sunset with millions in your wallet.... &nbsp;well, yeah, then you did the right thing.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.365gay.com/uncategorized/tues-watercooler-nom-sign-calls-for-murder-of-gay-couples/">The bad and the ugly become one</a></span>&nbsp;N.O.M. Protestor Displays 'Solution to Gay Marriage ' - Two Nooses</p><p><span><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/40345.html">Crazy Shelly&nbsp;&nbsp;got into a squabble with fellow Tea Partiers</a></span>&nbsp;in Missouri, who questioned her self-designated leadership of the Tea Party.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/29/cocaine-drug-sentencing/">Up is down, in is out, in Wingnut World&nbsp;</a></span>Rep. Lamar Smith Says Reducing Racial Disparity In Crack Cocaine Sentencing Hurts Minorities</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/gingrich-axis-evil-one-three/">Gingrich goes all out with war mongering and bigotry</a>&nbsp;</span>Doesn't it seem like this is all they have left?</p><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekJP8irPqYA&amp;feature=player_embedded">Well, that settles it. &nbsp;All those scientists are full of it.</a></span>&nbsp;Pat "American was built by white people" Buchanan said on Morning Joe this week regarding climate change, "I don't believe it... I've been to the beach for 50 years; it hasn't risen an inch."</p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/the-gop-plot-to-screw-the_b_662953.html">The GOP Plot to Screw the Economy and the Middle Class</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/29/tennesseans-desperate-wamp-unemployed/">A glimpse into the cold, dark abyss where a soul should be&nbsp;</a></span>As Tennesseans Desperately Search For Work, Wamp Suggests Unemployed Are 'Just Sitting Back Waiting'</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/az-threats-judge/">Wingnuts making death threats over Arizona's "show me your papers" law</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/right-wingers_stand_by_their_fabricated_mexican_dr.php?ref=fpb">Right Wingers Stand By Phony&nbsp;Mexican Cartel Invasion Story</a></span>&nbsp;Because trying to make white people afraid of brown people is all the GOP has left.</p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/mccain-kyl-stimulus-border/">McCain And Kyl Propose Using $701 Million In Stimulus Funds To Secure A Border That's Already Safe</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Time magazine reports that the border is "one of America's safest places," pointing out that the Arizona's overall crime rate dropped 12 percent last year and 23 percent between 2004 and 2008. However, Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) seem fixated on the right-wing myth that the bloody Mexican drug war has spilled over the border and that violence is, as McCain puts it, "the worst I have ever seen."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007300001">This wingnut writer says Arizona should secede&nbsp;</a></span>because a "liberal elite" judge has "disarmed" Arizona in the face of a "dangerous enemy." &nbsp;No, seriously. &nbsp;Quit laughing. &nbsp;Apparently,&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/republicans-take-it-easy-on-arizona-judge-who-struck-down-immigration-law.php?ref=fpb">he didn't get the memo</a>&nbsp;about not bad-mouthing the judge who blocked the nastiest parts of Arizona's "show me your papers" law, because she came highly praised by a wingnut leader.</p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/lindsey-graham-leaps-wingnut-land-wants-re">Why do Republicans hate our Constitution?&nbsp;</a></span>Lindsey Graham Leaps into Wingnut Land, Wants to Repeal Part of the 14th Amendment.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/florida-judge-health-care/">I dunno... &nbsp;sounds like "lying" to me</a></span>&nbsp;Florida Judge Throws Out Anti-Health Care Reform Ballot Measure Because Of 'Manifestly Misleading' Language</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/29/right-anti-islamic-bus/">Living and dying by bigotry</a></span>&nbsp;Right-Wing Group Launches 'Anti-Islamic' Bus Ads in Major Cities. &nbsp;It really is all they have left.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-sledge/just-how-far-is-the-groun_b_660585.html">For the record, the planned Muslim community center is not "at" Ground Zero,</a></span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;q=Masjid+Manhattan,+ny,+ny&amp;fb=1&amp;gl=us&amp;hq=Masjid+Manhattan,&amp;hnear=New+York,+NY&amp;cid=0,0,6903759195881236864&amp;ei=aftSTJGYFcT48AbMvfSOBQ&amp;ved=0CBkQnwIwAQ&amp;ll=40.715485,-74.005494&amp;spn=0.015581,0.028882&amp;z=15&amp;iwloc=A">there has been a mosque in the neighborhood for decades.</a></p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/mike-pence-lies-about-small-business-owner">I dunno... sounds like "lying" to me</a></span>&nbsp;Somehow Mike Pence thinks that 2% equals "more than half".</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/node/38675">Rand Paul: &nbsp;Still an ass</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/msnbc-does-re-do-matthews-defending-breitb">Chris Matthews: &nbsp;Still a complete idiot</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/slacktivist-why-every-attorney-genera">Why Every Attorney General Should Sue Credit-Rating Agencies</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1or5mQFz6Pc">The unhinged leading the insane</a></span>&nbsp;Huckabee invited Tim LaHaye (author of the "Left Behind" apocalyptic novels) to his Fox News show to discuss how President Barack Obama is moving us closer to the apocalypse.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/09/need-a-job-try-canada-whe_n_640555.html">Need A Job? Try Canada, Where Hiring Is Booming And Home Prices Are Rising</a></span>&nbsp;Companies can focus on business thanks to universal health care.</p><p><span><a href="http://wcco.com/local/tom.emmer.ad.2.1813455.html">Target is secretly pumping big bucks into GOP pockets</a></span>&nbsp;First Wal-Mart, now this: NOW where are those of us with no money and no taste supposed to shop?</p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/wide-range-of-foreign-scientists-advancing-climate-lies-in-order-to-boost-us-socialism-and-cripple-growth/">Wide Range of Foreign Scientists Advancing Climate Lies in Order to Boost US Socialism and Cripple Growth</a></span>Or something.</p><p><span><a href="http://blogs.denverpost.com/captured/2010/07/26/captured-america-in-color-from-1939-1943/">Awesome color photos from the Great Depression</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/dont-know-much-about-economics/">Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.): &nbsp;still "stone-cold ignorant."</a></span></p><blockquote><p><span>t</span>here's no way to go from what he now claims he was saying to the words he actually said. So he's both ignorant and dishonest, which we already knew from the way he tried to deny that privatizing Social Security was actually, um, privatizing Social Security.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/paul_ryan_wants.html">Paul Ryan also wants to take away your tax cuts.&nbsp;</a></span>Which, in Republican parlance, is the equivalent of a tax hike -- in the middle of a slow-growth recovery.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/quote_of_the_da_127.html">This is possibly the first time a player at the center of the DC traditional media establishment has been this honest about how it all works.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"The Sherrod story is a reminder -- much like the 2004 assault on John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth -- that the old media are often swayed by controversies pushed by the conservative new media. In many quarters of the old media, there is concern about not appearing liberally biased, so stories emanating from the right are given more weight and less scrutiny. Additionally, the conservative new media, particularly Fox News Channel and talk radio, are commercially successful, so the implicit logic followed by old-media decisionmakers is that if something is gaining currency in those precincts, it is a phenomenon that must be given attention. Most dangerously, conservative new media will often produce content that is so provocative and incendiary that the old media find it irresistible." --Mark Halperin</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/07/23/98013/study-finds-victims-race-can-skew.html">Unacceptable:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"Someone accused of killing a white person in North Carolina is nearly three times as likely to get the death penalty than someone accused of killing a black person, according to a study released Thursday by two researchers who looked at death sentences over a 28-year period."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/07/on_the_case_4.php?ref=fpblg">Priorities</a></span></p><blockquote><p>You may be getting down on the Senate because they couldn't manage to hold a vote Thursday on that jobs bill that Republicans are filibustering. But they did manage to double the penalty for marijuana brownies.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://jeffrey-feldman.typepad.com/frameshop/2010/03/conspiracy-tea.html">Tea Party offers safe haven to a mix of conspiracy theorists who know little about the Constitution.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/30/falling-off-a-cliff/">Stop the black guy!</a></span>&nbsp;Report: Obama's Judges Confirmed At Half The Rate Of Past Presidents</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7968">Oh, Mr. President -- Good on you for apologizing to Shirley, but what about ACORN?</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/07/29/obama-signs-act-to-empower-native-americans-to-fight-rape/">A gross injustice at long lest brought to an end&nbsp;</a></span>President Obama signed the Tribal Law and Order Act, giving tribes the right and resources to "investigate and prosecute rapes perpetrated by non-Natives on tribal lands."</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024975.php">Fred Barnes: &nbsp;Hypocrite&nbsp;</a></span>And I used to think he'd never be anything other than an artless wingnut hack</p><p><span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201007270036">When you've been caught with your hand -- and arm, up to the shoulder -- in the cookie jar, you just look foolish to keep insisting you're actually upstairs doing your homework</a></span><a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201007270036">.</a>&nbsp;Breitbart still insists Sherrod video "shows that she's the racist"</p><p><span><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/vp/38495587%2338495587#38495587">A fitting tribute to Phylliss Schlafly</a>&nbsp;</span>(I adore Lizz)</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024976.php">Obstructionism, Republican is thy name&nbsp;</a></span>From this week alone:</p><blockquote><p>The DISCLOSE Act came up, and every single Senate Republican joined together to block the bill from even getting a vote. A package of incentives and tax breaks for small businesses looked to be in good shape, but every single Senate Republican joined together to knock that down, too. Twenty obviously qualified judicial nominees were brought forward, and the GOP blocked votes on all of them. Medical care for 9/11 victims came up, and Republicans prevented it from passing, too.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/no_voting_right.html">How many ways can Fox be vile in one segment?&nbsp;</a></span>A lie told while whining about low taxes with racial undertones and a suggestion to stop poor people from voting. &nbsp;That's impressive. &nbsp;Do not attempt this at home! &nbsp;They are trained professionals.</p></span></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The once and future GOP</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/the-once-and-future-gop.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.345743</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-29T04:45:15Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-29T11:23:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension. A dimension of sound. A dimension of sight. A dimension of mind. You&apos;re moving into a land of both style and substance of things and ideas....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5388" label="Republican" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5138" label="RNC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<i>You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension. A dimension of sound. A dimension of sight. A dimension of mind. You're moving into a land of both style and substance of things and ideas. You've just crossed over into the Twilight Zone...</i><i><br /></i>Imagine if you will, a national Republican candidate running on the following platform: ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><b>Civil Rights</b></span></p><p>Complete liberty and<i>&nbsp;</i><span><i>exact equality</i></span>&nbsp;in the enjoyment of all civil, political, and public rights should be established and effectually maintained throughout the nation, by efficient and appropriate state and federal legislation. Neither the law nor its administration should admit any discrimination. &nbsp;It is the solemn obligation of the legislative and executive branches of the government to put into immediate and vigorous exercise all their constitutional powers for removing any just causes of discontent on the part of any class, and securing to every American citizen complete liberty and&nbsp;<span><i>exact equality</i></span>&nbsp;in the exercise of all civil, political, and public rights.</p><p>No state legislature has the authority to diminish the civil rights of minorities.</p><p>Opposition to the use of fraud, intimidation and violence to curtail the rights of minorities.</p><p>Support for,&nbsp;and pride in, the substantial advances recently made toward the establishment of equal rights for women. The honest demands of this class of citizens for additional rights, privileges, and immunities should be treated with respectful consideration.</p><p>Absolute support for freedom of religion -- believing that the spirit of our institutions as well as the Constitution of our country, guarantees liberty of conscience and equality of rights among citizens -- and opposition for any law that limits freedom of religion.</p><p>Opposition to direct or indirect funding for private schools. &nbsp;Support of a constitutional&nbsp;amendment forbidding the application of any public funds or property for the benefit of any school or institution under sectarin control.&nbsp; The public school system is the bulwark of the American republic, and we must work toward its security and permanence.</p><p><span><b>Immigration</b></span></p><p>Opposition to any federal or any state laws by which the rights of immigrants shall be abridged or impaired.</p><p>Immigration, which in the past has added so much to the wealth, development of resources and increase of power to the nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations, should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy.</p><p><span><b>Foreign policy</b></span></p><p>Sympathy with all the oppressed people which are struggling for their rights.</p><p>Anti-war:&nbsp;The national government should seek to maintain honorable peace with all nations.</p><p>"Might makes right" is a criminal premise that is&nbsp;in every respect unworthy of American diplomacy, and brings shame and dishonor to any government or people that approve of it or use it.</p><p><span><b>Economic policy and taxes</b></span></p><p>Support for a vigorous and just system of taxation.</p><p>Labor is the creator of capital, and trade policies should be so adjusted as to aid in securing remunerative wages to labor;&nbsp;&nbsp;duties upon importations should be so adjusted as to promote the interests of American labor.</p><p>Support for economic policy which secures to the workingmen liberal wages, to agriculture remunerative prices, to mechanics and manufacturers an adequate reward for their skill, labor, and enterprise, and to the nation prosperity and independence.</p><p>Opposition to further grants of the public lands to corporations and monopolies, and demand that the national domain be devoted to free homes for the people.</p><p>Support for the federal government to render immediate and efficient aid to the construction of public works -- being justified by the constitutional obligations of the government.</p><p><span><b>Constitutional issues</b></span></p><p>Recognition that the great principles laid down in the immortal Declaration of Independence are the true foundation of our democratic government.</p><p>Opposition to any thought of secession,&nbsp;holding in abhorrence all schemes for disunion, come from whatever source they may, and denouncing those threats of disunion as denying the vital principles of a free government, and as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it is the imperative duty of an indignant people sternly to rebuke and forever silence.</p><p><span><b>The&nbsp;</b><a href="http://dailyhurricane.com/2010/07/rachel-maddow-on-the-21st-century-southern-strategy.html"><b>"Southern Strategy"</b></a></span></p><p>We sincerely deprecate all sectional feeling and tendencies. We therefore note with deep solicitude that the opposition party counts, as its chief hope of success, upon the electoral vote of a united South, secured through the efforts of those who were recently arrayed against the nation and we invoke the earnest attention of the country to the grave truth, that a success thus achieved would reopen sectional strife and imperil national honor and human rights.</p><p><span><b>Here's the "Twilight Zone" part</b></span></p><p>Submitted for your approval: a real Republican. &nbsp;Obviously, this candidate is going to be loudly and repeatedly damned by today's Republican leadership and talking heads. There isn't a plank in this platform that isn't the opposite of what today's most vocal and visible Republicans are selling. The weird part is, this candidate is more genuinely Republican than those who would tar and feather him or her, because&nbsp;this candidate's platform is taken directly from the original Republican platform in 1856 and the subsequent Republican platforms in 1860, 1864, 1868, 1872 and 1876. &nbsp; This candidate has values, goals and policy preferences that align with President Abe Lincoln -- the first Republican president (1860 &amp; 1864) -- President&nbsp;Ulysses S. Grant (1868 &amp; 1872) and President&nbsp;Rutherford B. Hayes (1876), and maybe more...</p><p>Lincoln and the first Republicans were, obviously, socialists. I expect any day now Glenn Beck will scribble on his chalk board the irrefutable connections between them and Richard Owen, who had died just two years before. &nbsp;In a fit of integrity, Fox News, the RNC, the GOP, the Tea Party, Palin's Twitter and the Texas board of education will all "refudiate" (sorry, couldn't resist) and remove from our history books at least the first two decades of Republicans and at least the first three Republican presidents.</p><p>Or maybe we'll all wake up and discover it's all been a really bad dream.</p><p><br /></p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>News that shames our species</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/news-that-shames-our-species.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.345130</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-24T06:17:29Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-24T06:21:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[One remarkably hypocritical Democrat &nbsp;and Stupid Dem Alert!&nbsp;Nelson cites deficit to vote against unemployment benefits but backs budget-busting tax cuts for rich and an attempt to permanently repeal the pro-aristocracy estate tax.At least a few on the Right are finally...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48716" label="Breitbart" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6484" label="Fox" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="235" label="media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="360" label="race" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48659" label="Sherrod" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/nelson-tax-cuts-rich/">One remarkably hypocritical Democrat &nbsp;and Stupid Dem Alert!</a>&nbsp;</span>Nelson cites deficit to vote against unemployment benefits but backs budget-busting tax cuts for rich and an attempt to permanently repeal the pro-aristocracy estate tax.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/boehner-shep-journalists-breitbart/">At least a few on the Right are finally acknowledging that Breitbart is a liar</a></span>. &nbsp;But, dear Rep. Boehner, what happened to Shirley Sherrod is not "unfortunate." &nbsp;Tripping and twisting your ankle is "unfortunate." &nbsp;A fender-bender is "unfortunate." &nbsp;Mistaking the Milwaukee Brewers for a professional baseball team is "unfortunate." &nbsp;What happened to Sherrod was a grotesque, immoral, political act of character assassination for the purposes of fomenting racial division, fear and hatred. &nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/21/breitbart-farmers-wife-hoax/">Its perpetrator is vile, perverted and worthy of our highest contempt and slightest regard:</a></p><blockquote><p>last night, the right-wing blogger who instigated this faux controversy questioned the white farmers' honesty and repeated his false racist charges. In interviews with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and CNN, the Iron City, GA couple Roger and Eloise Spooner described Sherrod as a "friend for life" and a "good person" who helped save their farm. Speaking with CNN's John King, right-wing provocateur Andrew Breitbart challenged Eloise Spooner's "purported" story, accusing King of trusting Sherrod "that the 'farmer's wife' is the farmer's wife"</p></blockquote></span> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span>M<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/rachel-maddow-takes-down-fox-news-for-scare-white-people-tactics-video.php">ust watch: &nbsp;Massive smackdown of Rightwing tactics of racial division</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/ben-stein-ui/">A glimpse into the cold, dark abyss where a soul should be&nbsp;</a></span>Ben Stein: The Unemployed Are People With 'Unpleasant Personalities...Who Do Not Know How To Do A Day's Work'</p><p><span><a href="http://www.themudflats.net/2010/07/14/palins-sweettooth-coffee-spit/">Why tell a lie? &nbsp;Because it's there</a></span>. &nbsp;Sarah Palin lies about climbing a mountain.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.mormontimes.com/article/15943/Glenn-Beck-and-friends-link-freedoms-God-and-country?s_cid=queue_title&amp;utm_source=queue_title">Say What?!</a></span>&nbsp;Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) called Glenn Beck "a terrific human being" and said that Beck "help[s] people understand politics and understand virtues and principles."</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/buck-high-heels/">Were you aware that wearing silly, impractical, outdated footwear and being unable to avoid stepping on cowpies qualifies you to be a US Senator</a></span>? &nbsp;Me Neither.</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/tom-tancredo-impeach-obama-fox-news-thats-ridiculous-video.php?ref=fpa">Damn! &nbsp;I can't tell which guy is the bigger moron -- the guy who wants Tennessee to secede from the union</a></span>&nbsp;or the guy who thinks<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/gop-rep-and-tn-gov-candidate-wamp-states-might-have-to-consider-separation-from-this-government.php?ref=fpb">&nbsp;we should impeach the president because he's a bigger threat than al Qaeda.</a>&nbsp;And why are they not both in rooms with padded walls wearing jackets with arms that buckle in the back?&nbsp;<a href=" This guy should be in for his fitting soon">This guy should be in for his fitting soon</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;So long as these radicals are getting media coverage &nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/23/wamp-secession/">the GOP will continue to weaken</a>...</p><blockquote><p>many right-wing lawmakers embrace lunatic legal theories -- and their numbers grew significantly once President Obama took office. &nbsp;Right-wing Governors Bob McDonnell (R-VA) and Bobby Jindal (R-LA) both signed&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/21/emmer-nullification/">wildly unconstitutional</a>&nbsp;bills attempting to nullify health reform. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/07/judicial_extremism.html">Tenther Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas thinks that the ban on whites-only lunch counters is unconstitutional</a>, and other&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/27/tenther-highway/">tenther officials</a>&nbsp;claim that everything from Social Security to Medicare to the federal highway system is unconstitutional.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/23/webb-wsj/">Painfully stupid Dem Alert!&nbsp;</a></span>Webb Calls For White Americans To End 'Government Directed Diversity Programs'</p><blockquote><p>Clearly, Webb is unaware that affirmative actions programs have been&nbsp;<a href="http://www.infoplease.com/spot/affirmative1.html">effectively dismantled by the Supreme Court</a>. But worse, he's oblivious to the fact that his screed treads dangerously close to the discredited divide-and-conqueror tactics of the Southern strategy. In this new formation, Webb pits the sweeping and swelling segments of America's immigrant population against native-born Americans with the aim of rallying the nation's "white cultures."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLLo4gKeBBk">Operation scared sh*tless: &nbsp;Obama hates Whitey</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhQwfd3rBbY">Say What?!&nbsp;</a></span>Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) claimed that the "radical left" is destroying the "just cause" of the U.S. military by being pro-choice.</p><p><span><a href="143/fetch%3EUID%3E.vze4nz7a%3E31351">Quote of the Day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"This is the most activist court in history and every decision one-sided.&nbsp;They put not just their thumb on the scales of justice on behalf of corporations,&nbsp;but their fists, with brass knuckles."&nbsp;&nbsp;-- Sen. Al Franken</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/the-newly-introduced-public-option-proposal-will-reduce-the-deficit-by-68-billion/">The Newly Introduced Public Option Proposal Will Reduce the Deficit by $68 Billion</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100722/BUSINESS01/7220332/BlueCross+stockpiles+surplus+cash+while+raising+premiums">And they wonder why we need health care insurance reform (and why everybody hates them)?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"Nonprofit BlueCross and BlueShield health plans in several states, including Tennessee, stockpiled billions of dollars during the past decade, yet continued to hit consumers with hefty premium increases that could have been reduced in some cases, a new consumer study contends."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072302515.html">Motive, please?&nbsp;</a></span>"Long before an eruption of gas turned the Deepwater Horizon oil rig into a fireball, an alarm system designed to alert the crew and prevent combustible gases from reaching potential sources of ignition had been deliberately disabled, the former chief electronics technician on the rig testified Friday."</p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/fck-tea/">"Progress is the real American Party"</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The United States was founded fairly explicitly on a set of liberal ideals--pragmatic egalitarian cosmopolitan individualism is the American creed and the progressive movement is largely about trying to make those ideals a reality. John Boehner's view that human freedom somehow reached a peak in the 1950s and that therefore a reactionary politics is going to be liberatory is absurd.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/07/catch-22-credit-scores">The use of credit checks in employment decisions should be banned.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>It is a form of discrimination against the poor -- the codification and enforcement of class barriers. It is therefore a form of discrimination against those groups more likely to be poor and therefore a violation of the 14th Amendment. So it ought to be illegal already.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/">"Breitbart lied about Shirley Sherrod. Now he's lying about the NAACP."</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024863.php">The cancer that's killing American conservatism:&nbsp;</a></span>Rep. Steve King is "arguing that the USDA hired Shirley Sherrod because the agency perceived her as a racist." &nbsp;He's only one of the malignant tumors, of course.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/when_will_black.html">When will blacks stop oppressing whites?&nbsp;</a></span>An excellent review of Fox's evil coverage of the Sherrod tape</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/the_ground_zero_2.html">The sacred, patriotic Ground Zero titty bar</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024859.php">Today's Republicans just aren't good with money... or honesty</a></span></p><blockquote><p>the RNC's own treasurer believes the party deliberately failed to report more than $7 million in debt to the Federal Election Commission recently, as part of a scheme to make the RNC's finances look better than they really are. Hiding off-book debts is not only illegal, it also points to more system problems at party headquarters.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024861.php">How is America supposed to take the Right seriously when it opposes its own ideas?</a></span>&nbsp;"The sad paradox is that cap and trade -- which trusts in the efficiency of markets -- was originally a Republican policy."</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2010/07/a_question_for.html">Good question</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Where were you, Sarah? Newt, I'm assuming you were banging an intern while your wife was having a mammogram, but still: Where were you? Where were any of these "Sanctity of Ground Zero" people when the silk-suits just a few blocks south of our inverted American Golgotha drunkenly drove the entire U.S. economy off a cliff in 2008? Those spray-tanned patriots in their ivory towers didn't stop to think how Ground Zero would shudder and weep at their wanton, blinkered and pig-eager greediness; they didn't consider the families of the fallen that might be chewed beneath the unceasing gears of their vanity, literally destroyed by Capitalism in ways no self-immolating Islamist could imagine.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072302560.html">If there's a bus leaving for Hell -- these guys should be on it.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"The government's pay czar announced Friday that 17 companies benefiting from federal bailout money handed out $1.6 billion in excess executive pay at the height of the financial crisis. The firms include Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/23/american-crossroads-donors/">I don't think that word means what you think it means</a></span>&nbsp;Rove's RNC "<span>grassroots"&nbsp;</span>rival, American Crossroads, raised 97 percent of its money from four billionaires.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/23/terry-graham/">More of that "just funnin' ya" violence from the Right</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024872.php">This has not been a good week for American "journalists."</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.theygaveusarepublic.com/diary/6215/war-funding-is-deficit-spending-and-we-cant-have-that-so-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it">Since we're all talkin' budget deficit these days</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Our military budget is horrifically bloated and two wars have been waged off-the-books because Bush said that oil revenue would pay cover it. And enough people were stupid and gullible enough to believe the lyin' sumbitch.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/anderson-cooper-gives-breitbart-cover-paint">Anderson Cooper is an idiot.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/21/bishops-versus-jindal-guns/">One of these things doesn't go with the other...</a></span>&nbsp;Louisiana Bishops Rebuff New State Gun Law: 'We Don't Think It's Appropriate To Have Guns In Churches'</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/dadt-docs/">Just do the right thing: &nbsp;New Documents Show Truman Integrated Forces, Despite Military objections</a></span>&nbsp;Show some spine in 2010.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/oil-iran/">Big Oil loves Iran.</a></span>&nbsp;But it was "un-American" for the president to criticize BP for its historical environmental destruction? &nbsp;Paging Mr. Paul....</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/22/angle-runs-questions/">How will this wingnut stand up to the terrorists if she can't face a single question from the local media?</a></span>&nbsp;Sorry. &nbsp;I couldn't resist.</p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama is a socialist.  Or something.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/obama-is-a-socialist-or-someth.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.344711</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-21T18:42:52Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-22T18:26:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ I remember being a kid and being caught in a lie. &nbsp;It was a little lie, but I wanted to escape punishment so I created a bigger lie to cover. &nbsp;The effort snowballed as I kept upping the ante,...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="729" label="socialism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6192" label="socialist" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[ <br /><span><p><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/obama-socialist-pig.jpg"><img title="obama-socialist-pig" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/obama-socialist-pig.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="218" /></a>I remember being a kid and being caught in a lie. &nbsp;It was a little lie, but I wanted to escape punishment so I created a bigger lie to cover. &nbsp;The effort snowballed as I kept upping the ante, adding more and more details and making the fib more and more outrageous in the hope that my accuser would finally think,<i> "Well, no one would make up a story that wildly absurd and expect to be believed, so it must be true. &nbsp;Truth must be stranger than fiction!" &nbsp;</i>It didn't work, of course.</p><p>I'm reminded of that episode every time I hear someone claim that President Obama is a socialist or pursuing a socialist agenda. The difference seems to be that some people, in this case, are at least temporarily fooled by the outrageously false tales. &nbsp;My first impulse is angry frustration, but I temper that reaction with the understanding that there are a great many things our educational system fails to teach, and both the definition of socialism and our nation's own political history are among them.</p><p>So -- stepping back and taking a deep breath -- let's take a look at how well the "Obama is a socialist" assertion fits with the real world.</p><p><br /></p></span>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p>Perhaps the easiest way to dismiss such nonsense is to point to the Obamacans, the Republicans who support Barack Obama.&nbsp; Republicans with names like Eisenhower, Goldwater, Nixon and Powell.</p><p>Lesser known, but still influential, Republicans also supported Obama:</p><ul><li>Ken Adelman, campaigned for Goldwater, worked for Rumsfeld under Nixon, Ford and Bush, and served as Reagan's director of arms control;</li><li>Wick Alison, former publisher of the National Review;</li><li>Jack Antaramian, Florida real estate developer and Bush fundraiser;</li><li>former State Sen. Phil Arthurhultz and majority leader (R-MI);</li><li>Timothy Ashby, worked for Reagan and Bush 41;</li><li>Andrew Bacevich, Professor of International Relations at Boston University;</li><li>John Perry Barlow, former Dick Cheney Campaign Manager;</li><li>Tom Bernstein, Yale classmate of Bush 43, co-owner or the Texas Rangers baseball team with Bush 43, donated $2,000 to the Bush's reelection campaign and $50,000 to the Republican National Committee;</li><li>Robert R. Bowie, worked for Eisenhower;</li><li>Christopher Buckley, son of National Review founder William F. Buckley and former National Review columnist;</li><li>John Canning, raised more than $100,000 for Bush 43;</li><li>David Caprara, worked for Bush 43;</li><li>former Gov. Arne Carslon (R-MN);</li><li>Dorothy Danforth Burlin, daughter of former Sen. John Danforth (R-MO);</li><li>William Donaldson, former Chairman of the Securities &amp; Exchange Commission under George W. Bush;</li><li>Ken Duberstein, Reagan's White House Chief of Staff;</li><li>former Sen. David Durenberger (R-MN);</li><li>former Rep. Mickey Edwards (R-OK);</li><li>former Rep. Robert F. Ellsworth (R-KS), Nixon's Deputy Secretary of Defense and United States Permanent Representative to NATO;</li><li>William B. Ewald, Jr., worked for Eisenhower;</li><li>former Rep. Harris Fawell (R-IL.);</li><li>Charles Fried, Solicitor General for Reagan;</li><li>David Friedman, economist and son of Milton Friedman;</li><li>former Rep. Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD);</li><li>Lilibet Hagel, wife of former Sen. Chuck Hagel (NE);</li><li>Jeffrey Hart, senior editor, National Review;</li><li>Rita Hauser, a New York philanthropist who raised money for both Bush 41 and Bush 43, was a member of 43's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board;</li><li>former Gov. Linwood Holton (R-VA);</li><li>Dennis Hopper, actor and former Bush supporter;</li><li>Larry Hunter, policy advisor to Reagan and Senior Fellow at the Institute for Policy Innovation and Chief Economist for the Free Enterprise Fund;</li><li>Rear Admiral John Hutson, USN (ret.), former Judge Advocate General of the Navy and the current dean and president of Franklin Pierce Law Center;</li><li>Jarold Kieffer, worked for Eisenhower;</li><li>Dorothy King, archeologist, author, and conservative blogger;</li><li>Douglas Kmiec, head of the Office of Legal Counsel under Reagan and Bush 41;</li><li>former Rep. Jim Leach (R-IA);</li><li>George C. Lodge, worked for Eisenhower;</li><li>John Martin, Afghan war veteran and founder of the website Republicans for Obama;</li><li>Scott McConnell, editor of the American Conservative;</li><li>former Rep. and Sen. Charles Mathias (R-MD);</li><li>Scott McClellan, former spokesman for George W. Bush;</li><li>former Gov. William Milliken (R-MI);</li><li>Tricia Moseley, former member of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond's staff;</li><li>Paul O'Neill, United States Secretary of the Treasury for Bush 43;</li><li>John Patrick Diggins, distinguished professor of history at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York;</li><li>Roswell B. Perkins, worked for Eisenhower;</li><li>former Sen. Larry Pressler (R-SD);</li><li>Bruce Rabb, worked for Nixon;</li><li>Bill Ruckelshaus, worked for Nixon and Reagan;</li><li>David Ruder, Chairman of the Securities &amp; Exchange Commission under President Ronald Reagan;</li><li>Frank Schaeffer, pro-life advocate and the son of evangelist Francis Schaeffer.</li><li>former Rep. Claudine Schneider (R-RI);</li><li>Richard S. Seline, Finance Director, Republican Party of Texas;</li><li>Andrew Sullivan, columnist for the Atlantic Monthly, commentator and author of The Conservative Soul;</li><li>Michael Smerconish, columnist for the Philadelphia Enquirer and conservative radio host;</li><li>Mayor Lou Thieblemont, (R) Camp Hill, PA;</li><li>Tag Tognalli, White House Staff under Reagan and Connecticut McCain Delegate to 2000 Republican National Convention;</li><li>former Gov. and Sen. Lowell Weicker (R-CT);</li><li>former Gov. William Weld (R-MA); and</li><li>Mayor Jim Whitaker, (R) Fairbanks, AK.</li></ul><p>This wave of endorsements led The Economist to publish an in-depth examination of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12470555">"The Rise of the Obamacons"</a>&nbsp;and their influence:</p><blockquote><p>The biggest brigade in the Obamacon army consists of libertarians, furious with Mr Bush's big-government conservatism, worried about his commitment to an open-ended "war on terror," and disgusted by his cavalier way with civil rights.... For many conservatives, Mr. Obama embodies qualities that their party has abandoned: pragmatism, competence and respect for the head rather than the heart. Mr. Obama's calm and collected response to the turmoil on Wall Street contrasted sharply with Mr. McCain's grandstanding.... How much do these Obamacons matter? More than Mr. McCain would like to think. The Obamacons are manifestations of a deeper turmoil in the Republican rank-and-file, as the old coalition of small-government activists, social conservatives and business Republicans falls apart. They also influence opinion.... The more tantalising question is whether the rise of the Obamacons signals a lasting political realignment.... If the Republican Party continues to think that the problem lies with the rats, rather than the seaworthiness of the ship, then the Obamacons are here to stay.</p></blockquote><p>These are respected, educated, generally rational conservatives who are neither easily mislead nor likely to endorse a "far Lefty," much less a socialist.&nbsp; Given their support of Obama,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/08/AR2010040805701.html">Newt Gingrich</a>&nbsp;should have been laughed off the national stage when he called the president "the most radical president in American history" and urged his partisan audience to stop Obama's "secular, socialist machine."</p><p>In addition to these conservatives of fame and influence, there were multiple millions of rank and file conservatives who voted for Obama in the presidential election. The Economist cited a poll in late October 2008 that indicated Obama was "winning 22% of self-described conservatives, a higher proportion than any Democratic nominee since 1980."</p><p>Meanwhile, the American Left has expressed deep displeasure with the president's policies.&nbsp; There's even talk about some Democrats running a candidate against their own president because Obama isn't liberal enough and is too eager to seek compromises with conservatives.</p><p><span><b>Defining "socialism"</b></span></p><p>Beyond the logistical problem of reconciling massive conservative support for Obama with the partisan rhetorical ploy of calling him a "radical" or a "socialist" lies a definitional problem:&nbsp; Obama's policies and goals do not fit the definition of socialism. Different socialists define socialism in different ways, but Princeton's definition boils it down to its philosophical essence: "a political theory advocating state ownership of industry" and "an economic system based on state ownership of capital."</p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://socialistparty-usa.org/platform/">Socialist Party USA</a>&nbsp;defines itself thusly:</p><blockquote><p>Socialism will establish a new social and economic order in which workers and community members will take responsibility for and control of their interpersonal relationships, their neighborhoods, their local government, and the production and distribution of all goods and services.</p><p>For these reasons we call for social ownership and democratic control of productive resources, for a guarantee to all of the right to participate in societal production, and to a fair share of society's product, in accordance with individual needs.</p></blockquote><p>No rational, honest and informed analysis of Obama's political and economic theory or practice can conclude that they fit that definition.&nbsp; As Norman Ornstein, of the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank, wrote in a&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/13/AR2010041303686.html">Washington Post column</a>:&nbsp; "To one outside the partisan and ideological wars, charges of radicalism, socialism, retreat and surrender are, frankly, bizarre."</p><p>Ornstein demonstrated that most of Obama's policies, from health care to the "stimulus" and foreign policy, are based on ideas proposed by conservatives or Republicans, or passed with their cooperation or approval.&nbsp; "This president," he wrote, "is a mainstream, pragmatic moderate, operating in the center of American politics; center-left, perhaps, but not left of center."</p><p><span><b>Traits of socialist nations</b></span></p><p>Beyond the problems of conservative support for Obama and the bad fit between Obama's polices and goals and those of socialism, there is the problem of real-world results:&nbsp; America under Obama does not share the most characteristic traits of developed socialist nations.&nbsp; In fact, we're farther away than almost everyone else.</p><p>Socialist countries typically have high taxes, but America, under Obama, had its lowest tax bill since 1950.&nbsp; Our taxes as a share of GDP -- 28% -- is nearly the lowest among the 31 nations in the OECD.&nbsp; Obama's 2009 tax cut for 95% of Americans is the opposite of what you'd expect from a socialist (and puts the lie to some of his most vocal critics on the Right).</p><p>Socialist countries also typically redistribute significant portions of the income of their most wealthy citizens, but according to the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient">Gini coefficient</a>" (which gauges inequality and can be used for, among other things, comparing how redistributive various economies are) the United States has greater income inequality, among "developed" nations, than all other countries except Brazil and Mexico.&nbsp; Put simply, that means America is farther away than almost all of its peers from socialist redistribution.</p><p><a href="//localhost/Library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html">According to the CIA</a>&nbsp;(a decidedly conservative agency):</p><blockquote><p>The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $46,400.&nbsp;<span>In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace.&nbsp;</span>US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products....&nbsp;<span>Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households.</span>&nbsp;<span>(emphasis added)<span></span></span></p></blockquote><p>In short, the CIA is saying America fits neither the definition of socialism (state-owned industry) nor the real-world traits of socialism (redistribution).</p><p><span><b>Obama's buddies</b></span></p><p>For all the false furor raised during the campaign over who Obama "pals around" with or is influenced by, his record of appointments to important and powerful posts tells a much different story.</p><p>Robert Gates, secretary of defense in Bush 43's cabinet, is also secretary of defense in Obama's cabinet.&nbsp; (Retired Marine Corps Four-star General James Jones was Bush 43's special envoy for Middle East security and chair of the Atlantic Council of the United States, and now he's Obama's national security adviser.)</p><p>Obama's choice of Timothy Geithner for the cabinet post of treasury secretary made Wall Street very happy, resulting in one of the largest two day gain for some time.&nbsp; Socialists and socialism don't typically get warm receptions from Wall Street.</p><p>Ray LaHood (R-IL), Obama's cabinet choice for secretary of transportation, is was&nbsp; Republican member of Congress.</p><p>Arne Duncan, secretary of education in Obama's cabinet, has launched initiatives that echo those of Bush 43 - such as the Race to the Top, which pits state against state for federal education dollars that are won by submitting proposals that include "reforms" like expanding charter schools and judging teachers partly on how well their students do on standardized tests.&nbsp; He was, in fact, professional vested in charter schools before becoming head of Chicago's public school system.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.rethinkingschools.org/restrict.asp?path=archive/23_03/arne233.shtml">Critics of his tenure in Chicago</a>&nbsp;come from the Left and they say Duncan was too eager to close neighborhood public schools and replacement by charter schools.&nbsp; They also don't like what they call his "militarization" of the schools.&nbsp; Socialists don't favor charter schools over private schools.</p><p>Tom Vilsack, Obama's cabinet pick for secretary of agriculture, was greeted with high praise from the big agribusiness groups, including endorsements from the Corn Refiners Association, the National Grain and Feed Association, the National Farmers Union, and the American Farm Bureau Federation.&nbsp; His only real opposition came from the Left, where some said Vilsack repeatedly demonstrated a preference for large industrial farms and genetically modified crops, that as Iowa's governor blocked local communities from regulating where genetically engineered crops would be grown, and that was the founder and former chair of the Governor's Biotechnology Partnership, and was named Governor of the Year by the Biotechnology Industry Organization, an industry lobbying group.&nbsp; Socialists and big business don't typically love each other so much.</p><p>Lisa Jackson, secretary of EPA in Obama's cabinet, has been sharply criticized for being too close to industry and for dragging her feet when cleaning up New Jersey's numerous toxic waste sites.&nbsp; As noted above, socialists and big business aren't usually so close.</p><p>Ken Salazar, Obama's secretary of the interior, is a right-of-center Democrat with strong ties to the coal and mining industries and who often favors industry and big agriculture in battles over global warming, fuel efficiency and endangered species.&nbsp; His nomination won high praise from Bush 43's interior secretary, Dirk Kempthorne.</p><p>Gary Locke, Obama's pick for commerce secretary, was mightily criticized by fellow Democrats when he was Washington's governor for embracing the no-new-taxes approach to dealing with the state's budget problems and for proposing to: lay off thousands of state employees; cut health coverage; freezing most state pay; and cutting funding for nursing homes and programs for the developmentally disabled. Locke suspended two voter-passed, pro-school initiatives while cutting state education funding, but allocating record-high amounts for construction projects.&nbsp; What sort of socialist, what sort of "far Left" leader, approaches budgets this way?&nbsp; No sort.</p><p>Ron Kirk, Obama's pick for US trade representative, took heat from the Left for his strong support of NAFTA, championed tax cuts for businesses, negotiated a World Trade Organization (WTO) proposal that was so objectionable to the public interest it needed to be kept a secret - he had shown ACTA text to dozens of corporate lobbyists and all of its trading partners in the ACTA negotiation, and the text was only secret from the public -- and worked to meet industries demands at the WTO.</p><p>Hillary Clinton's selection by Obama for secretary of state won praise from most conservatives because she's long been known as a hawk who seems to be the sort of person who enjoys eating rusty nails for breakfast.</p><p>Many of Obama's picks for non-cabinet posts also appear to be far removed from both socialism and the "far Left."</p><p>Gil Kerlikowske, Obama's director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, is an Army veteran, a graduate of the FBI academy and the former chief of police in Seattle.</p><p>Dennis Ross, Obama's pick for special adviser for the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia, worked in both Reagan's and Bush 41's state departments.&nbsp; He co-authored a study recommending greater U.S. intervention in "the Persian Gulf Region because of our need for Persian Gulf oil..." and wrote another paper that called for appointment of a "non-Arabist Special Middle East envoy" who would "not feel guilty about our relationship with Israel." Ross was a noted supporter of the Iraq war.&nbsp; If he's a liberal - much less a member of the "far Left" or a socialist - he's also a master of disguise.</p><p>Gary Samore, Obama's pick for White House coordinator for arms control and weapons of mass destruction, proliferation, and terrorism, doesn't have much of a "lefty" footprint either: after working for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the RAND Corporation, he joined the State Department and worked for Reagan.</p><p>Austen Goolsbee, Obama's top economics adviser, is from the very conservative University of Chicago and has argued against a single payer solution in America. Obama's health plan was the only one of the major three to not even attempt universality, failing even to include a public option for those who wish to buy in (more on this later).</p><p>Much earlier, labor and some liberal activists were boiling mad over Obama's choice of centrist economist Jason Furman as the top economic advisor for his presidential campaign. Furman, the Left charges, has overstated the potential benefits of globalization, Social Security private accounts and the low prices offered by Wal-Mart -- considered a corporate abomination by much of the Left.</p><p>As&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-schaeffer/obamas-critics-from-the-l_b_147173.html">Frank Schaeffer noted</a>, America's Left was not pleased.&nbsp; Here is Cris Hayes, writing in&nbsp;<span>The Nation</span>&nbsp;(Nov. 21, 2008):</p><blockquote><p>"Not a single, solitary, actual dyed-in-the-wool progressive has, as far as I can tell, even been mentioned for a position in the new administration. Not one."</p></blockquote><p>and William Greider, also in the&nbsp;<span>The Nation</span>&nbsp;( Nov. 25, 2008):</p><blockquote><p>" A year ago, when Barack Obama said it was time to turn the page, his campaign declaration seemed to promise a fresh start for Washington. I, for one, failed to foresee Obama would turn the page backward... Obama's [cabinet] selections seem designed to sustain the failing policies of George W. Bush."</p></blockquote><p>and Noam Chomsky, posting on Alternet (Nov. 28, 2008):</p><blockquote><p>"Rhetoric we know, but what are [Obama's] actions?... The first choice was the Vice President, Joe Biden, one of the strongest supporters of the war in Iraq... The first post-election appointment was for Chief of Staff, which is a crucial appointment; determines a large part of the president's agenda. That was Rahm Emanuel... again, a longtime Washington insider. Also, one of the leading recipients in congress of funding from the financial institutions hedge funds... Obama's choices... [include] Robert Rubin and Larry Summers... among the people who are substantially responsible for the crisis. One leading economist, one of the few economists who has been right all along in predicting what's happening, Dean Baker, pointed out that selecting them is like selecting Osama Bin Laden to run the war on terror..."</p></blockquote><p><span><b>The Obama agenda and socialism</b></span></p><p>I suppose it's possible that the president has included so many conservatives in his inner circle and still be a socialist leading, as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/09/palin-obama-is-leading-am_n_212943.html">Sarah Palin charges</a>, the nation toward socialism.&nbsp; If this were the case, Obama's socialism - at minimum, his far Left liberalism - would show up in his agenda and actions. &nbsp;Except it doesn't.</p><p>The<i>&nbsp;</i><span><i>Exhibit A</i></span>&nbsp;"proof" of Obama's socialism - the one that causes the most hyperbolic, vein-popping, spittle-flecked rants -- was his reform of our health insurance industry.&nbsp; The irony is that when&nbsp;<a href="http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Graphics/2010/022310-Bill-comparison.aspx">Kaiser Health News</a>&nbsp;compared the Democrats' 2003 bill with the Republican's 1993 health care reform bill, it found that they shared 12 of the 17 most significant aspects.&nbsp; As the<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/five_compronises_in_health_car.html">Washington Post</a>&nbsp;noted:</p><blockquote><p>I don't think it's well understood how many of the GOP's central health-care policy ideas have already been included as compromises in the health-care bill. But one good way is to look at the GOP's "Solutions for America" homepage, which lays out its health-care plan in some detail. It has four planks. All of them -- yes, you read that right -- are in the Senate health-care bill.</p><p>...And finally, we shouldn't forget the compromises that have been the most painful for Democrats, and the most substantive.&nbsp;<span>This is a private-market plan.</span>&nbsp;Not only is single-payer off the table, but at this point, so too is the public option.&nbsp;<span>The thing that liberals want most in the world has been compromised away.</span><span>(emphasis added)</span></p></blockquote><p>Richard Nixon, were he alive, would be surprised to hear his health care reform ideas described as&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/steele-yes-health-care-reform-is-armageddon.php">Armageddon</a>, as<a href="http://www.minnpost.com/ericblack/2010/03/24/16895/is_the_health_care_legislation_unconstitutional">unconstitutional</a>&nbsp;and as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/20/steele-calls-obama-health_n_240989.html">socialism</a>.&nbsp; Nixon -- the Republican?&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/opinion/31krugman.html">Why yes, Nixon</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Nixon's proposal for health care reform looks a lot like Democratic proposals today. In fact, in some ways it was stronger. Right now, Republicans are balking at the idea of requiring that large employers offer health insurance to their workers; Nixon proposed requiring that all employers, not just large companies, offer insurance.</p><p>Nixon also embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to "approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures." No illusions there about how the magic of the marketplace solves all problems.</p></blockquote><p>So Obama's socialistic takeover of health care - of which we were warned repeatedly and breathlessly -- never materialized.&nbsp; Here's conservative writer&nbsp;<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/12/goodbye-to-all-that-why-obama-matters/6445/">Andrew Sullivan's</a>&nbsp;summary:</p><blockquote><p>"Again, the ferocious rhetoric belies the mundane reality. Between the boogeyman of 'Big Government' and the alleged threat of the drug companies, the practical differences are more matters of nuance than ideology. Yes, there are policy disagreements, but in the wake of the Bush administration, they are underwhelming. Most Republicans support continuing the Medicare drug benefit for seniors, the largest expansion of the entitlement state since Lyndon Johnson, while Democrats are merely favoring more cost controls on drug and insurance companies. Between Mitt Romney's Massachusetts plan--individual mandates, private-sector leadership--and Senator Clinton's triangulated update of her 1994 debacle, the difference is more technical than fundamental. The country has moved ever so slightly leftward. But this again is less a function of ideological transformation than of the current system's failure to provide affordable health care for the insured or any care at all for growing numbers of the working poor."</p></blockquote><p>Of course, none of the reality interfered with the politically driven fantasy that Obama's lukewarm, highly Republican, private-market based reform was an act of&nbsp;<a href="http://iowaindependent.com/30540/anti-health-reform-rally-sets-stage-for-obama">tyranny</a>, akin to the bombing of&nbsp;<a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/beck-health-care-reform-will-affect">Pearl Harbor</a>, a&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201001300005">Bolshevik plot</a>, similar to the&nbsp;<a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/glenn-beck-health-care-reform-just-9">attack on 9/11</a>, reviving the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/03/sigh_3.php?ref=fpblg">ghosts of communist dictators</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/03/maxing_out_the_rhetoric.php">Armageddon</a>, an unconstitutional leap toward&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/20/politics/main5174417.shtml">socialism</a>&nbsp;- a fantasy that fueled a series of&nbsp;<a href="http://filterednews.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/health-care-reform-the-constitution-and-the-reckless-right/">ridiculous lawsuits</a>&nbsp;from politicians trying to score points with uninformed constituents.</p><p>It's interesting to note that President&nbsp;<a href="http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&amp;site=filterednews.wordpress.com&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fopen.salon.com%2Fblog%2Fpaul_j_orourke%2F2010%2F03%2F24%2Fnews_pres_signs_h-care_insurance_mandate-212_years_ago&amp;sref=http%3A%2F%2Ffilterednews.wordpress.com%2Fpage%2F3%2F">John Adams enacted a health insurance mandate</a>&nbsp;decades before socialism was born:</p><blockquote><p>In July, 1798, Congress passed, and President John Adams signed into law "An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen," authorizing the creation of a marine hospital service, and&nbsp;<span>mandating privately employed sailors to purchase healthcare insurance.</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p>This legislation also created America's first payroll tax, as a ship's owner was required to deduct 20 cents from each sailor's monthly pay and forward those receipts to the service, which in turn provided injured sailors hospital care. Failure to pay or account properly was discouraged by requiring a law violating owner or ship's captain to pay a 100 dollar fine<span>. (emphasis added)</span></p></blockquote><p>Virginia's attorney general actually made the&nbsp;<a href="http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X1342&amp;site=filterednews.wordpress.com&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fapp.mx3.americanprogressaction.org%2Fe%2Fer.aspx%3Fs%3D785%26lid%3D46172%26elq%3Dda24ee97558a48218378aa0cdd8444a5&amp;sref=http%3A%2F%2Ffilterednews.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F03%2F">absurd assertion</a>&nbsp;that "at no time in our history has the government mandated its citizens buy a good or service" in making the case that Obama's health insurance reform is un-American, if not unconstitutional.&nbsp; Apparently, he is unaware of John Adams' health insurance mandate, as well as&nbsp; George Washington's Second Militia Act of 1792, which required a whole lot of U.S. civilians to buy, with their own money, "a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack" and various other items. Many of the members of Congress who voted to pass this law had been members of the Philadelphia Convention that wrote the Constitution itself.&nbsp; So if Obama is a socialist, then so were many of our Founding Fathers.</p><p>But we need not go back more than 200 years to show how silly the charge is. Got&nbsp; a paycheck?&nbsp; Take a look at the stub.&nbsp; See the deductions for Social Security and Medicare?&nbsp; Those are federally mandated purchases of insurance.&nbsp; Your employer also pays into unemployment insurance on your behalf, and since that amount could arguably be used for wages, it can be said that you're buying that insurance, too.</p><p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2010/03/socialists_hate_health_care_re.php">Socialists</a>, by the way, opposed Obama's health care reform, calling it&nbsp; "a corporate restructuring of the health insurance industry created to protect the profit margins of private insurance companies.... (M)andates allow private insurers to use the coercive power of the state to enhance their private profits. Insurance credits will serve as a public subsidy to private companies. It is yet another case of public money that could be used for necessary social programs being funneled towards companies that engage in practices that are abusive and detrimental to the overall society."&nbsp; And, of course, Obama's reform does not put the working class in control of the health care system nor redirects the profits of the health care industry to workers, which is what socialism would demand.</p><p>One American socialist leader said Obama's reform is the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031301899.html">opposite</a>&nbsp;of what socialists want:&nbsp; "By mandating that every person be insured, ObamaCare would give private health insurance companies license to systematically underinsure policyholders while cashing in on the moral currency of universal coverage."</p><p><span><i>Exhibit&nbsp;</i></span><i>B </i>for conservatives wanting to paint Obama as a socialist is the bailout of the financial sector.&nbsp; To make that argument stick, however, we must conveniently forget that it was started under Bush and Paulson, it was largely necessary due to the deregulation of the financial industry, and - most importantly - the banks are still owned by and earning profits for capitalists.&nbsp; Some of the banks in question were, by the way, given loans (not bought out) which they repaid.&nbsp; Others - like&nbsp;<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0701/Is-Obama-a-socialist-What-does-the-evidence-say/(page)/2">AIG</a>-- took tax payer money to pay off bad bets with other banks like Goldman Sachs.</p><blockquote><p>The largest ownership stake for Uncle Sam in the financial world is AIG, which ran into financial difficulties (not bankruptcy) in September 2008 after a complex series of financial transactions turned bad. The US government still owns almost 80 percent of AIG, which has received at least $182 billion in government assistance.</p><p>In his book, Gingrich implies that government officials stormed into AIG's headquarters and took over the company. "They have taken over AIG, America's largest insurer," he writes.</p><p>The actual "takeover" of AIG occurred under President Bush in 2008, right after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.</p></blockquote><p>Using an action by President Bush to paint President Obama as a socialist is a particularly smarmy way to apply an already spurious smear.</p><p><a href="http://www.newsocialist.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=96%3Ais-nationalization-of-the-banks-good-for-us-is-it-socialism&amp;Itemid=102">Socialists,</a>&nbsp;on the other hand, call for giving the working class direct input into how these enterprises are operated and having workers directly benefit from them.&nbsp; All that's happened under Bush and Obama is that the government temporarily owns shares in some&nbsp;of these firms, but the capitalist owners still run them and receive the profits.</p><p><span><i>Exhibit C:</i></span>&nbsp;The government's intervention with the auto industry is another rallying point for those asserting Obama's socialism. A socialist would oppose private ownership and would want automobile manufacturing to be controlled collectively and for automobiles to be distributed according to need&nbsp; -- but the auto bailout's goal was to help the private companies, known as the Big 3, survive as private institutions that sell their cars according to what customers will pay for them.&nbsp; In short, the goal was to preserve an aspect of capitalism, not establish socialism.</p><p>The Right has charged that the Obama administration was socialist in its "sweeping" management mandates, particularly at GM, but&nbsp;<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0701/Is-Obama-a-socialist-What-does-the-evidence-say/(page)/2">GM spokeswoman Noreen Pratscher says that's not true</a>:&nbsp; "The government has taken a very hands-off approach."</p><p>Beyond the fact that the bailout was meant to preserve capitalism, beyond the fact that the government's intervention was designed to be temporary, and beyond the fact that it was&nbsp; safeguarding the tax payer loans to the auto makers, is the fact that it was a necessary step to avert an even greater economic collapse.&nbsp; Here's the president explaining:</p><blockquote><p>This is a difficult situation that involves fundamental questions about the proper role of government. On the one hand, government has a responsibility not to undermine the private enterprise system. On the other hand, government has a responsibility to safeguard the broader health and stability of our economy.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Addressing the challenges in the auto industry requires us to balance these two responsibilities. If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers. Under ordinary economic circumstances, I would say this is the price that failed companies must pay -- and I would not favor intervening to prevent the automakers from going out of business. But these are not ordinary circumstances. In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action. The question is how we can best give it a chance to succeed. Some argue the wisest path is to allow the auto companies to reorganize through Chapter 11 provisions of our bankruptcy laws -- and provide federal loans to keep them operating while they try to restructure under the supervision of a bankruptcy court. But given the current state of the auto industry and the economy, Chapter 11 is unlikely to work for American automakers at this time.</p></blockquote><p>Does that sound like a socialist bent on government takeover&nbsp; -- a "<a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzVjNzJlOTBiODNmOTg4M2ViMDllYWY3Y2Y5YmQyNzc=">power grab</a>," as one Republican senator called it -- of the entire economy?&nbsp; To some, it does, and it's proof that Obama is a socialist.&nbsp; Trouble is, the quote is from George W.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/19/transcript-president-bush-auto-industry-bailout/">Bush</a>, who actually&nbsp;<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/19/transcript-president-bush-auto-industry-bailout/">began the process</a>&nbsp;that Obama finished.&nbsp; (By the way, it's hard to agree that the intervention was a "power grab" when the auto makers spent quite a bit of time begging for government intervention.)</p><p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/nov2008/pers-n17.shtml">Socialists</a>, on the other hand, hated the auto industry bailout, saying:</p><blockquote><p>It is now clear that the central issue in the debate over whether to extend a bailout to the US auto industry is the destruction of the conditions of auto workers. Whether it takes the form of a government loan or the bankruptcy of one or more of Detroit's Big Three carmakers, the aim is to create conditions which will rip up existing labor agreements and drive auto workers back to conditions of poverty and ruthless exploitation which existed prior to the industrial battles that built the United Auto Workers union in the 1930s.</p></blockquote><p>Not only did the bailout not put ownership of the means of production into the hands of workers, not only did the bailout not redirect profits from capitalist owners to the workers, but the bailout hurt workers in a number of important ways.</p><p><span><i>Exhibit D:</i></span><i>&nbsp;</i>Financial sector regulation and consumer protection are also being described as&nbsp;<a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2010/05/22/financial_regulation_bill_is_socialism">socialism</a>&nbsp;- and, once again, the charge is absurd.&nbsp; Obama's tentative steps in this direction are so weak that they're not only unacceptable to socialists, they're not even good enough for a budget-hawk liberal like&nbsp;<a href="http://www.progressive.org/rc071310.html">Sen. Russ Feingold</a>&nbsp;(D-WI):</p><blockquote><p>"Unfortunately, this bill doesn't do the job," Feingold says. The two major issues that it doesn't address, he says, are replacing the firewall between regular banking activities and gambling on Wall Street and breaking up institutions that are "too big to fail."</p></blockquote><p>According to&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031301899.html">actual American socialists</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The first clear indication that Obama is not, in fact, a socialist, is the way his administration is avoiding structural changes to the financial system. Nationalization is simply not in the playbook of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and his team. They favor costly, temporary measures that can easily be dismantled should the economy stabilize. Socialists support nationalization and see it as a means of creating a banking system that acts like a highly regulated public utility. The banks would then cease to be sinkholes for public funds or financial versions of casinos and would become essential to reenergizing productive sectors of the economy.</p><p><br /></p></blockquote>Knocking down the faux socialism straw men is, however, just the start of showing how Obama's policies separate him from socialism - even from much of the liberal/progressive Left. &nbsp;A few significant and illustrative examples include Obama's</span><span><br /><ul><li>support for states rights to ban late term abortions;</li><li>decision against investigating Bush, Cheney, Rove and other members of the Bush administration for what are, to many, obvious crimes;</li><li>giving billions to large corporations;</li><li>dropping the public option in health care reform;</li><li>having the CIA assassinate al Qaeda and Taliban leaders at a far greater rate than during the Bush administration;</li><li>expanding, far beyond what Bush did, the role of special operations forces in "secret wars" across the globe;</li><li>calling for more tax cuts in next year's budget;</li><li>achieving the nation's lowest tax bill in 50 years;</li><li>proposal to spend $8 billion to help build two new nuclear reactors in Georgia;</li><li>launching a major military offensive against the Islamo-fascists in Afghanistan;</li><li>support for the FISA bill legalizing warrantless wiretapping and granting immunity to telecom firms that engaged in criminal activity;</li><li>desire to expand the size and budget of the Pentagon (something he's already done);</li><li>belief that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is a terrorist organization;</li><li>dismissal of promise to rewrite NAFTA as just overheated campaign rhetoric;</li><li>prolonging of the Iraq occupation and desire to keep residual troops in Iraq;</li><li>bombing in Pakistan;</li><li>support for so-called merit pay for public-school teachers;</li><li>silence in response to, if not support of, what many see as Israel's war crimes;</li><li>support - prior to the BP disaster - for expanded offshore oil drilling;</li><li>appointment of two Supreme Court justices who are more conservative than the justices they replaced;</li><li>refusal to make any real effort to address climate change;</li><li>tepid approach to ending "Don't Ask Don't Tell";</li><li>decision to keep Guantanamo open and operating;</li><li>decision to continue using torture and rendition;</li><li>decision against making a strong stand in favor of due process rights;</li><li>continuation of Bush policies of workplace raids and speedier deportations of immigrants;</li><li>continuation of Bush policies of detentions and domestic surveillance;</li><li>increasing the number of troops in Afghanistan; and</li><li>decisions to continue Bush's bank bailouts but against nationalizing the banks.</li></ul><p>Liberal economist Paul Krugman described his "despair" that Obama "has apparently settled on a financial plan that, in essence, assumes that banks are fundamentally sound and that bankers know what they're doing. It's as if the president were determined to confirm the growing perception that he and his economic team are out of touch, that their economic vision is clouded by excessively close ties to Wall Street."&nbsp; Not exactly what one would expect to read about a socialist.</p><p>Every major candidate in the last presidential election supported use of targeted military force against al-Qaeda if necessary, preventing Iran from getting the nuclear bomb, maintaining an open-ended deployment in Afghanistan and an unswerving alliance with Israel - and Obama was firmly entrenched in the middle of them. So if we're going to claim Obama's foreign policy is too far to the Left, we'll have to say the same thing about McCain, Palin, Romney, Huckabee et al.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031301899.html">Meanwhile,</a>&nbsp;an American "socialist foreign policy would call for the immediate removal of all troops. It would seek to follow the proposal made by an Afghan parliamentarian, which called for the United States to send 30,000 scholars or engineers instead of more fighting forces."</p><p>"Barack Obama has never made any bones about it: He is a moderate," said Matt Bennett, co-founder of Third Way, a moderate public policy think tank. "People who ignored that did so at their peril."</p><p>In his best-selling book,&nbsp;<span>The Audacity of Hope</span>, Obama actually echoed a favorite rightwing narrative in taking the Left to task and praising President Reagan's appeal:</p><blockquote><p>That Reagan's message found such a receptive audience spoke not only to his skills as a communicator; it also spoke to the failures of liberal government, during a period of economic stagnation, to give middle-class voters any sense that it was fighting for them. For the fact was that government at every level had become too cavalier about spending taxpayer money. Too often, bureaucracies were oblivious to the cost of their mandates. A lot of liberal rhetoric did seem to value rights and entitlements over duties and responsibilities.</p><p>...by promising to side with those who worked hard, obeyed the law, cared for their families, and loved their country, Reagan offered Americans a sense of a common purpose that liberals seemed no longer able to muster. And the more his critics carped, the more those critics played into the role he'd written for them--a band of out-of-touch, tax-and-spend, blame-America-first, politically correct elites.</p></blockquote><p>The incontrovertible, inescapable fact is that Obama's foreign, domestic, social and economic policies have been relentlessly centrist - at times center-left, at other times center-right, but always squarely in the center.&nbsp; Those who don't see that, or who are shocked by that, simply haven't been paying attention.</p><p><span><b>The socialist view</b></span></p><p>What do real&nbsp;<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0701/Is-Obama-a-socialist-What-does-the-evidence-say">socialists</a>&nbsp;think of President Obama?</p><blockquote><p>What Mr. Johns, Mr. Gingrich, and others brandishing the "socialist" s-word are really complaining of is a return to the policies of John Maynard Keynes, the English economist who advocated vigorous government involvement in the economy, from regulation to pump priming, says labor historian Peter Rachleff of Macalester College in St. Paul, Minn.</p><p>"Socialism suggests getting rid of capitalism altogether," says Dr. Rachleff. "Mr. Obama is not within a million miles of an ideology like that."</p><p>For what it's worth, socialists deny that Obama is one of them - and even seem a bit insulted by the suggestion.</p><p>"I have been making a living telling people Obama is not a socialist," says Frank Llewellyn, national director of the Democratic Socialists of America. "It's frustrating to see people using our brand to criticize programs that have nothing to do with our brand and are not even working."</p><p>Adds Billy Wharton,co-chair of the Socialist Party USA: "I am not even sure he's a liberal. I call him a hedge fund Democrat."</p></blockquote><p>Well then, is Obama a "secret socialist"?&nbsp; The&nbsp;<a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/09/09/top-u-s-socialist-says-barack-obama-is-not-one-of-them/">real socialists</a>&nbsp;say "no" through their laughter:</p><blockquote><p>He's not a secret socialist. He's not any kind of socialist at all. He's not challenging the power of the corporations. The banking reforms that have been suggested are not particularly far reaching. He says we must have room for innovation. But we had innovation -- look where it got us. So I just...I can't...I mean laugh out loud, really.</p><p>I was on Glenn Beck recently and he said Canada is a socialist country. Well, there is a party in Canada that's called "socialist" within the Democratic party, that's won some provincial elections, never won a federal election. It would be news to them that Canada is socialist. So it's just unserious.</p><p>They always use socialism to try to defeat moderate reforms...just because something is government run doesn't mean it's socialist. I've never heard anybody say we have a socialist army.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/socialism-not-quite-say-socialists">There's more:</a></p><blockquote><p>"As I understand it, we have taken over the country," says Kastner, who is a proud member of&nbsp;<a href="http://socialistparty-usa.org/states/wisconsin.html">the Milwaukee local of the Socialist Party</a>. "The Republicans in Congress, the talk radio, all through the health-care debate, they've been saying its proof that the Socialists are in charge. Can you believe it?"</p><p>It has been almost exactly 50 years since a capital "S" Socialist last ran a major American city, let alone anything more major.</p><p>But, now, a bemused Myrtle Kastner notes that her party appears to have taken complete charge of the U.S. government--or so House Minority Leader John Boehner, various and sundry sulking Republican politicians, and their amen corner in the media (led by the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity) would have us believe.</p><p>What surprises Kastner is not merely the fact that the party, which sometimes has a hard time filling all the chairs at its meetings, organized the takeover without informing her--or, to her knowledge, any other Socialists.</p></blockquote><p><span><b>Summary</b></span></p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=Obama+is+a+socialist&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;source=univ&amp;ei=D6UVTJjBCofiNZ7P-N8L&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image_result_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=5&amp;ved=0CDYQsAQwBA">Obama is a socialist</a>. It has to be true, because we hear it said repeatedly, on television and from people we trust.&nbsp; We hear it in the spittle-flecked rants of the Tea Party faithful who don't know any better and from calculating Republican political operatives who do know better but don't care, but we also hear it from college-educated, suburban guys in JC Penney's suits and ties - the people our culture presumes to be calm, reasonable and fairly informed.&nbsp; Some, knowing the error of those words, use euphemisms like "most liberal" and "far Lefty" as a way of saying, "Well, 'socialist' may not be technically correct, but the basic complaint is valid."</p><p>Except it's not. &nbsp;To even be suspected of being a duck, one must look like a duck, walk like a duck or quack like a duck. &nbsp;The Oval Office is utterly duckless.</p><p><span><span>President Obama: won the support of millions of Republican voters in 2008; won the support of a great many well-known and highly respected Republican leaders; populated much of his inner circle with Republicans and conservatives; spoken and written glowingly of capitalism, centrist values and conservative icons; spoken and written critically of what he sees as liberal excesses; adopted, continued and expanded a great many of the major policy initiatives of George Bush; pursued a great many agenda items that earn criticism from the Left; has been pro-capitalism and pro-private sector in all of his major policy initiatives; has continued and expanded military interventions begun by George Bush; and has earned laughing derision from socialists. &nbsp;The United States has a market-oriented (not socialist) economy in which private individuals and business firms (not worker collectives) make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace (not from government-owned and government-run production).</span></span></p><p>If you thought Obama was a socialist before, you were probably unaware and mislead; if you think Obama is a socialist now, you're just stupid.</p><p><br /></p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>News links in no particular order</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/news-links-in-no-particular-or.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.343601</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-13T18:33:34Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-13T18:36:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ Hypocrisy watchSen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) aggressively pressed Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on whether she believes there are "natural" rights that come from God as opposed to the Constitution. &nbsp;Kagan responded that her job "as a justice is to...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7325" label="Arizona" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14168" label="corporate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7171" label="hypocrisy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="235" label="media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="675" label="racism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[ <span><p><br /><span><a href="http://politicalcorrection.org/factcheck/201006300010">Hypocrisy watch</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) aggressively pressed Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on whether she believes there are "natural" rights that come from God as opposed to the Constitution. &nbsp;Kagan responded that her job "as a justice is to enforce the Constitution and the laws," not her personal beliefs. &nbsp;That answer clearly miffed Coburn, even though it's the exact same view that conservative Justice Clarence Thomas expressed at his own confirmation hearings.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/07/border_governor_conference_cancelled.html">Well, Arizona's GOP's leadership is at least consistent in its feudal attitude toward its peasants</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Mexico's border state governors say they're not stepping foot in Arizona for their annual meeting, so Brewer cancelled the confab. Problem is, she doesn't have that authority.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://politicalcorrection.org/factcheck/201007080007">This sort of thing only makes you look desperate.</a></span>&nbsp;GOPer King fumbling around trying, pathetically, to save face after his "default mechanism" canard.</p><p><b><br /></b></p></span>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/danielschultz/2950/why_is_the_economy_stuck..._theology_for_nonbelievers_/">Market theology for nonbelievers</a></span></p><blockquote><p>I've been making this point for a long time now: there is an edge to our current state of economic screwdom that takes it beyond the ordinary. I hesitate to call it "spiritual," because that always makes people's eyes glaze over. But indeed, there is something about this meltdown that calls for explanations of its meaning in a philosophical or theological sense.</p><p>And it's right about there that most non-religious people say, "the hell with this. I'd rather watch Keith Olbermann." They shouldn't. There's something important to hear, and since nobody seems to be listening, I simply shall have to make the same point again, only more obnoxiously.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2010/07/sarah-palins-makeup-artist-nominated-for-emmy/59461/">Remember during the final stretch of the 2008 presidential campaign, when FEC disclosure filings revealed the somewhat embarrassing news that Sarah Palin's highest-paid staffer was her traveling makeup artist?</a></span>&nbsp;Well, that makeup artist has been nominated for an Emmy Award for her makeup artistry on the Fox series, So You Think You Can Dance.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/12/angle-reid-stimulus/">Wingnut&nbsp;Angle Claims She Opposed Construction Project Because It Received Stimulus Funds -- Even Though It Didn't</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/12/kyl-berwick-credit/">Hypocrisy watch&nbsp;</a></span>Kyl Takes Credit For Preventive Health Provisions In Health Law That He And All The Senate GOP Opposed</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024694.php">Hypocrisy watch</a></span></p><blockquote><p>...the frequently-confused Virginian will host yet another job fair made possible by the Recovery Act that Cantor claims to hate. It's the third time the Minority Whip has pulled this identical stunt, proving that he's either unaware of the hypocrisy or just too shameless to care.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024695.php">The Tealand millionaire buying the GOP primary to face Feingold loves him some oil!</a></span>&nbsp;Seems he's into owning oil stock by almost a half mill -- with $300K+ in BP alone. &nbsp;He's running around defending BP without mentioning his financial interest -- and he's favoring letting them drill in the Great Lakes.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/12/hemmer-tea-parties/">Your corporate media at play: &nbsp;Fox News promoted Tea Party town halls because they made 'better television.'</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/13/poll-majority-americans-unemployment/">Immorally stupid Dem alert!&nbsp;</a></span>Ben Nelson vs. The Public: Super Majority In Favor Of Extending Unemployment Benefits Despite Deficit Impact. &nbsp;Surely being this stupid has to be a sin....</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024680.php">Even for today's right, this truly is insane.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>It's also more than a little offensive -- the United States has a scandalous history with slavery, where human beings were legally declared to be property, and bought and sold accordingly.</p><p>If Bachmann and her hysterical allies want to whine incessantly about Democrats cleaning up the mess Republicans dumped on the country, fine. That's to be expected. But if she and her ilk could avoid the silly victim's complex and stop comparing themselves to people the nation allowed to be treated as chattel, I'd sure appreciate it.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/11/AR2010071103540.html">The Left's answer to the Tealanders?</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://zeldalily.com/index.php/2010/07/the-american-south-is-progressing-in-wake-of-the-constance-mcmillen-disaster/">The South deserves more respect</a></span></p><blockquote><p>And so Candace McMillen's nightmarish experience continues to be a valuable lesson -- to those in the South about the importance of the U.S. Constitution (and the rights provided therein) and to those of us that may have thought of the South as almost a caricature of human nature. There is still a lot of learning left to do, but it's refreshing to see forward-moving steps.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024685.php">Pollster making the obvious available to all</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Pollster Scott Rasmussen, who maintains he is reliable and independent despite criticism from Democrats that he tilts to the right, will in November speak for no fee on a post-election National Review cruise to raise money for the conservative magazine.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/12/obama-higher-rate-women/">Another step in the right direction</a></span>&nbsp;For those who value ethnic, racial, and gender diversity in the federal judiciary, President Obama's record is second to none.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/business/energy-environment/13bprisk.html">In BP's Record, a History of Boldness and Costly Blunders</a></span>&nbsp;Read it and weep. &nbsp;Pretty damning stuff.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/6617/emmer-still-telling-debunked-lie-that-servers-make-100000-per-year">Never let facts stand in your way</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Republican MN-GOV candidate Tom Emmer continues to repeat the debunked lie he told at the Eagle Street Grille last week that servers make $100,000 per year. &nbsp;Instead of apologizing or saying he misspoke he's blaming the media....</p><p>When busted for telling an outright lie, tell more lies. &nbsp;Now the media don't report "truthfully, honestly and accurately" if they repeat your lies.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://kaystreet.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/fox-friends-compare-jimmy-buffett-to-hugo-chavez-2/">Fox &amp; Friends Compare Jimmy Buffett To Hugo Chavez</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/personal/archive/2010/07/raise-a-glass-with-charles-woodson/59325/">Look, they should just be happy it's not home-brew beer. &nbsp;it is Green Bay, after all.</a></span></p><blockquote><p><span><span>(The NFL)&nbsp;has barred the Green Bay Packers cornerback--and wine-maker--Charles Woodson from promoting his own label, TwentyFour. It appears Woodson isn't going down without a fight. According to his website, he's launching a "Summer Wine Tour."</span></span></p><p><span><span>...<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/food/archive/2010/07/the-nfls-war-on-wine/59130/">Despite the fact that every professional football game is festooned with beer advertisements</a>--and, if you happen to be at a Jets game, obnoxious drunkards as well--the commissioner, Roger Goodell, has piously forbidden players from endorsing alcoholic beverages.</span></span></p><p>For a league plagued by illegal dog-fighting, persistent strip-club shootings, and domestic violence, this strikes me as absurd and completely wrong-headed. Wine-making would confer some much-needed class and sophistication to a sport in very short supply.... Until Goodell wises up, we all can all support Woodson by buying his wine<a href="http://twentyfourwine.com/twentyfour_2005.html">here</a>. I'm told his&nbsp;<a href="http://twentyfourwine.com/twentyfour_2005.html">Stags Leap District Cabernet&nbsp;</a>is especially good.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147496279">Did you know yoga was evil?</a></span>&nbsp;Me neither. &nbsp;Go figure.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/07/13/fox_news_andrew_napolitano_is_going_rogue.php">Fox 'News' Judge Andrew Napolitano Says Bush, Cheney 'Should Have Been Indicted!'</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Napolitano says what Bush and Cheney did while in office was "blatantly unconstitutional, and in some cases criminal."</p><p>When asked by Nader what the consequences should be, the judge says, in no uncertain terms: "They should have been indicted! They absolutely should have been indicted! For torturing, for spying, for arresting without warrant."</p></blockquote><p>He says the "evidence... is overwhelming" that Bush &amp; Cheney &nbsp;"participated in criminal conspiracies to violate the federal law and the guaranteed civil liberties of hundreds, maybe thousands of human beings." &nbsp;I agree. &nbsp;I'll bet he's done at Fox.</p><p><span><a href="http://mydd.com/users/theyoungturks/posts/who-is-more-conservative-ronald-reagan-or-barack-obama">I guess I'm not the only old Republican who was left behind by the Radical Reckless Right</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Ronald Reagan:</p><p>• Gave Amnesty to Illegal Immigrants</p><p>• Negotiated with Terrorists (Traded Arms for Hostages with Iran)</p><p>• Raised Taxes on a Large Scale Four Times (After Initially Lowering Them)</p><p>• Negotiated with the "Evil Empire" without Pre-conditions</p><p>• Made a Decision to "Cut and Run" From Lebanon After Our Troops Were Attacked</p><p>In fact, as you look at the Reagan list, it seems he is the exact opposite of what conservatives now claim they want. It looks like the caricature of what they think liberals do. There is no way that even Dennis Kucinich would be able to do all of those things; he certainly wouldn't negotiate with terrorists the way Reagan did.</p><p>Of course, Reagan also took the country further right in many ways but our political spectrum has moved so far to the right that he looks left behind by comparison.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/greatest-threat-america">This level of hyperbole reveals you only as a transparent fool</a></span></p><blockquote><p>At a rally for Tea Party darling and Republican senatorial candidate Ken Buck, former Congressman Tom Tancredo called Barack Obama the greatest threat America has ever faced. Ever. Including al Qaeda and the Soviet Union.&nbsp;<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/12/buck-tancredo/">Update:&nbsp;Senate Candidate Ken Buck Clarifies: All Liberals -- Not Just Barack Obama -- Are America's 'Greatest Threat'</a></p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/gop-candidate-obama-and-carnahan-want-to-take-away-your-chance-to-find-the-lord-audio.php?ref=fpa">This level of hyperbole only reveals you as a transparent fool -- Part II</a></span>GOPer: Obama Is Taking Away&nbsp;Our Freedom To Find Jesus</p><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/07/fun_times_in_alabama.php?ref=fpblg">The sad part is one of these guys will actually win.</a>&nbsp;</span>Republican primary in Georgia.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/07/it_could_be_worse.php#more?ref=fpblg">It could be worse.</a></p><p><span><a href="http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=901356">Born Poor? Half of These Babies Will Spend Most of Their Childhoods in Poverty; Significantly More Likely to Be Poor 30 Years Later</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/021811.html#more">Racism regaining acceptance?&nbsp;</a></span>Seems so, at least in the movies.</p><blockquote><p>I was prepared for the white protagonists. I was prepared for the brown villain. But I was not prepared for the visual experience clearly demarcating the line of good and evil by color of skin.</p><p>....The ending scene in which the southern water tribe wars with the fire nation is just a massive headache. They set it up as a nation of good, gentle, heroic white people versus the selfish and malicious nation of dark people. Come f*cking on.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/49915808-76/law-companies-utah-illegally.html.csp">Our corporate masters at play</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Thousands of Utah companies may be breaking state law by hiring employees without using a federal work status verification program, but officials aren't concerned and there's no rush for businesses to comply because they face no penalties...</p></blockquote><p>Break the law, we'll look the other way. &nbsp;And we wouldn't punish you anyway.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/what-do-facts-have-do-it">Study finds that facts don't change people's minds</a></span></p><blockquote><p>In fact, quite the opposite. In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/democracy-and-misinformation/">More....</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The good news and bad news is that democracy has never involved a well-informed citizenry reflecting on the issues of the day. I think the misinformation literature needs to be read in tandem with the research indicating that overall levels of political information are extremely low. Two thirds of Americans can't name any Supreme Court justices and only one percent can name all nine. The reason the system functions is that democratic accountability doesn't depend on voters knowing what they're talking about. Most people have strong partisan identities, and just vote for the same team. And swing voters' views are driven overwhelmingly by economic performance.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/americans-fuzzy-on-what-progressive-means/">Americans Fuzzy on What "Progressive" Means</a></span>&nbsp;Probably could have stopped at "Americans Fuzzy"</p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/subsidizing-the-rich/">America's war on the middle class</a></span></p><blockquote><p>This policy is typical of the way the federal government does business. In case after case, Washington's web of subsidies and tax breaks effectively takes money from the middle class and hands it out to speculators and have-mores. We subsidize drug companies, oil companies, agribusinesses disguised as "family farms" and "clean energy" firms that aren't energy-efficient at all. We give tax breaks to immensely profitable corporations that don't need the money and boondoggles that wouldn't exist without government favoritism.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2010/07/13/earth_to_glenn_beck_there_have_been_numerous_investigations_into_acorn_and_each_one_cleared_the_organization_of_wrongdoing.php#more">Beck says there's been no investigation in ACORN and makes the case that it's because it's part of a pattern of black racist communists stacking the deck against whites.</a></span>&nbsp;No investigation?</p><blockquote><p>How about the one conducted by the&nbsp;<a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0615/preliminary-report-clears-acorn/">GAO</a>&nbsp;that just recently exonerated ACORN? Or how about the one conducted by the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30919.html">Congressional Research Service</a>&nbsp;that found ACORN broke no laws in the past five years? Or what about the investigation by the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/03/01/2010-03-01_bklyn_acorn_cleared_over_giving_illegal_advice_on_how_to_hide_money_from_prostit.html#ixzz0gxn9q8uT">Brooklyn District Attorney&nbsp;</a>which not only cleared ACORN by found that those videos Beck boasted about had been edited to meet the anti-ACORN agenda of the videographers? There was also the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.proskauer.com/files/uploads/report2.pdf">independent investigation</a>&nbsp;by the former attorney general of Massachusetts that ACORN commissioned that while critical of the organization, found no legal wrongdoing. California's attorney general conducted an investigation, too, and yep, you guessed it -<a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/50559/calif-attorney-general-acorn-committed-no-criminal-acts">&nbsp;no criminal acts</a>were found.</p></blockquote><p>His context for this is also BS: &nbsp;It's about "Black Panthers" who are not the Black Panthers (and have been sued by the Black Panthers) and who conducted a "national campaign" of voter harassment that consisted of two guys at one polling station where most voters are black -- the criminal case against whom Obama is supposed to have because he's racist against whites,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=when_was_the_new_black_panther#120462">except that it was dropped prior to Obama taking office</a>. The decision not to pursue a civil right case against them was also made partly because there was no complaint, partly because there was no evidence and partly because the Bush admin knew the law was meant to go after widespread voter suppression, not a couple of guys outside one station --&nbsp;<a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=the_nbpp_evidence_review">a decision made prior to the wingnut's whipping boy arrived at DOJ</a>. &nbsp;The rest of his rant is his typical tinfoil hat connect-the-dots conspiracy crap.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harry-shearer/another-katrina-myth-bust_b_642737.html">Katrina</a></span></p><blockquote><p>it becomes increasingly clear that almost every piece of information spread about the event by the national media has turned out to be, to use a term of journalistic art, wrong.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2010/07/10/nasa-hottest-year-solar-minimum/">NASA: First Half Of Year Is Hottest Ever Recorded</a>&nbsp;</span>More&nbsp;<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/7/13/883868/-Open-thread-for-night-owls:-hot-and-hotter">bad news&nbsp;</a>to come:</p><blockquote><p><span></span>newly published study has concluded that, by 2039, the United States could experience at least four crop-destroying, life-threatening seasons "equally as intense as the hottest season ever recorded from 1951-1999."</p></blockquote><p>But because Al Gore is rich and fat, and because it snowed last winter, none of this can be true.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/09/business/economy/09rich.html?_r=2">All those poor black people who didn't read the fine print on their balloon mortgages and ARMs are screwing everyone!&nbsp;</a></span><span>Or not.</span></p><blockquote><p>Whether it is their residence, a second home or a house bought as an investment, the rich have stopped paying the mortgage at a rate that greatly exceeds the rest of the population.</p><p>More than one in seven homeowners with loans in excess of a million dollars are seriously delinquent, according to data compiled for The New York Times by the real estate analytics firm CoreLogic.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/09/AR2010070902342.html">Arizona's governor keeps making crap up</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The Arizona Guardian Web site checked with medical examiners in Arizona's border counties, and the coroners said they had never seen an immigration-related beheading. I called and e-mailed Brewer's press office requesting documentation of decapitation; no reply.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/13/paul-ryan-taxin-everybody/">Add Rep. Paul Ryan to the crap that Wisconsin has unleashed into the world.</a>&nbsp;</span>The list includes Ed Gein, Jeff Dahmer, Jim Sensenbrenner Tommy Thompson and Bud Selig.</p><p><span><a href="http://blog.reidreport.com/2009/07/glenn-beck-makes-it-unanimous-obama-hatred-is-mostly-about-race/">Yes, it really is about race</a></span></p><blockquote><p>From the birthers, to the tea partiers, to the Jeremiah Wright controversy, to the Palinites who toted stuffed monkeys to the campaign rallies and screamed "sit down, boy" and "kill him" (referring to Obama), to the outcry over Sonia Sotomayor, to the raw, on-the-record racism of Rush Limbaugh, the racist, violent (but curiously anonymous) Freepers who regularly describe the first lady as an ape, and recently described the pre-teen Obama girls as ghetto whores, and now Beck, does any sane person doubt that Obama Derangement Syndrom is really just unrepressed racism on steroids, practiced by people who are frustrated that they don't live in an era when they can just lynch the people they hate, or force them to sit in the colored section of the bus?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jan/04/imf-study-links-lobbying-high-risk-lending">Not really a surprise</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Three IMF economists conclude that extensive lobbying and political contributions by financial institutions were highly correlated with naughty behavior in the mortgage markets</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://blog.reidreport.com/2010/07/media-scam-obamas-50-percent-poll-crisis/#more-15175">The media scam on Obama's poll numbers</a></span></p><blockquote><p>One way to read this poll, is that, as the WaPo said, about a third of voters have no confidence in the president, Republicans and Democrats. Another way to read it is that two-thirds of voters have at least some confidence in all of the above. And 71 percent have at least some confidence in Obama. But the pollsters chose to group two unlike things together: "some" and "none," into one catch-all, doomy-gloomy statistic. So what do "some" and "none" have in common? Actually, nothing. "some" and "none" are mutually exclusive. It would be as if I reported to you the percentage of people who either read "some" or "none" of this post; or the share of American adults with "some" children or "none," versus "a lot."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/07/the_best_column_ive_read_today.html">How we get it wrong</a></span></p><blockquote><p>in the United States, we're not steering the economy by the dictates of the market. We're steering the economy by the dictates of what some people think the market might want at some point in the future. Listening to the market is one thing. Trying to predict its future demands is another.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/07/god-guns-and-gaydar-laws-of-probability.html">God, Guns, and Gaydar: The Laws of Probability Push You to Overestimate Small Groups</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/07/10/1724712/the-facts-according-to-glenn-beck.html">Beck University Alumni</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/76191/should-businesses-be-run-the-post-office">The post office is actually well run and cost effective.</a>&nbsp;</span>As Kevin Drum<a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/07/let-us-now-praise-usps">&nbsp;notes</a>: "... just go ahead breathe the words "universal service" and see how many private sector companies are still eager to compete with the post office for 46 cents an ounce."</p><p><span><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/07/james_mattis_its_fun_to_shoot.html">General "it's fun to shoot some people" to lead Middle East military</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/07/whos-going-win-year">Election Day: &nbsp;It's all about the Benjamins</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/07/lead-week">Our corporate masters</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The sweeping legislation that grew out of Toyota Motor Corp.'s sudden-acceleration crisis -- heralded as the most important auto safety bill in a decade -- has been scaled back significantly in the face of auto industry opposition.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://polizeros.com/2010/07/13/scaredy-cat-cop-afraid-of-big-bad-anarchists/">Cop gone wild</a></span></p><blockquote><p>A Washington DC police officer who was caught on video last winter brandishing his gun at a snowball fight has blamed anarchist panic for his actions.</p><p>Maybe someone that confused and irrational has no business being a police officer?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/07/08/obama.economy/">Quote of the Day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"It's a little odd getting lectures on sobriety from folks who spent like drunken sailors for the last decade." &nbsp;--Obama</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0713/security-contractor-bp-fired-photos-dispersants/">Security guard: BP fired me for taking photos of dispersants</a>&nbsp;</span>Nothing to see here - move along</p><p><span><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-12/the-coming-battle-over-the-cost-of-birth-control/">The conservative anti-choice movement is also anti-other people having sex without punishment.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2010/07/all-about-taxes-and-spending-srsly/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Stay classy wingnuts</a></span>&nbsp;A local tea party leader who's sending around links to a Little Rascals re-mix that "depicts Farina as Obama, makes jokes about Joe Lieberman and the Holocaust, and likens Nancy Pelosi to a whore."</p><p><span><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/07/mil_fib_with_a_twist.php?ref=fpblg">Yet another Republican candidate lies about military record</a>&nbsp;</span>Does that make 3 this year?</p><p><span><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-july-8-2010/latino-911-">Jon Stewart on immigration</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~3/fRQ3t4uYuwc/vitter_supports_lawsuits_over_obama_citizenship.html">The Radical Reckless Right pushes him from a stupid, dishonest criminal to absolutely ridiculous</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Sen. David "in diapers with my whore" Vitter (R-LA) says he supports lawsuits challenging President Obama's citizenship in court, the AP reports. Vitter made the comments at a town hall event.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2010/7/11/23345/6928">On the peril of the Tea Party</a></span></p><blockquote><p>I've never seen a fringe movement take control of a party's soul and mind like this before. I was hoping that the governance of Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, and Karl Rove was the worst the right could offer, but it's not even close. The Republicans have been cynical so long that they've been taken over by the duped.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024676.php">It's quite a message to Americans:</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Republicans believe $30 billion for unemployment benefits don't even deserve a vote because the money would be added to the deficit, but Republicans also believe that adding the cost of $678 billion in tax cuts for the wealthy to the deficit is just fine.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/horizon-oil-spill.html">Check out the PBS live feed from the oil spill</a></span></p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Study: Majority support for torture under Bush was a myth</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/study-majority-support-for-tor.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.343014</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-08T13:11:19Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-08T14:32:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Most Americans supported torture during the Bush years -- right? &nbsp;We were especially supportive if we thought torture would "thwart a terrorist attack" -- right? &nbsp;It was in all the papers and posted all over the blogosphere, Left and Right,...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="586" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="235" label="media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5862" label="polls" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1041" label="torture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[Most Americans supported torture during the Bush years -- right? &nbsp;We were especially supportive if we thought torture would "thwart a terrorist attack" -- right? &nbsp;It was in all the papers and posted all over the blogosphere, Left and Right, so it must be true -- Right?<br />Well, no.<br /><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=6&amp;fid=7819653&amp;jid=PSC&amp;volumeId=43&amp;issueId=03&amp;aid=7819652&amp;fulltextType=DS&amp;fileId=S1049096510000697">According to the scientists who study such things, that was all bull</a> (they use a nicer word).<br /><blockquote>But this view was a misperception. Using a new survey dataset on torture collected during the 2008 election, combined with a comprehensive archive of public opinion on torture, we show here that a majority of Americans were opposed to torture throughout the Bush presidency. This stance was true even when respondents were asked about an imminent terrorist attack, even when enhanced interrogation techniques were not called torture, and even when Americans were assured that torture would work to get crucial information. Opposition to torture remained stable and consistent during the entire Bush presidency. Even soldiers serving in Iraq opposed the use of torture in these conditions. As we show in the following, a public majority in favor of torture did not appear until, interestingly, six months into the Obama administration.</blockquote><br /><blockquote>Why have so many politicians and journalists so badly misread the strong majorities opposed to torture? A recent survey we commissioned helps shine a light on this question. Psychologists describe a process of misperception--"false consensus"--whereby an individual mistakenly believes that his or her viewpoint represents the public majority. False consensus has a long legacy in social psychological research, but our survey is unique in that it examines, for the first time, how false consensus may have shaped the public debate over torture. Our survey shows that this false consensus pervades the opinions of those who support torture, leading them to significantly overestimate the proportion of the public that agrees with them. Those people opposed to torture, in contrast, have remarkably accurate perceptions of the rest of the public.</blockquote>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span>Military personnel oppose torture in even higher numbers than do civilians.</span><blockquote>Above all, people who are asked to torture by politicians feel a deep sense of betrayal by those who ask them to do terrible things that are beyond what can or should be demanded of a professional soldier. Military leaders are aware of the strong deprofessionalization effects of torture, and that soldiers who have been involved in torture are harder to assign to other responsibilities. Other soldiers do not accept them back into their ranks because they are perceived as undisciplined and lacking in ethical values.</blockquote><br /><span>Most Republicans oppose torture.</span><blockquote>The most notable aspects of this survey are its findings of a considerable contraction in opposition to torture among Republicans, from 66% in 2004 to 59% in 2009, and an increase of those who said a ban on torture would be too restrictive, from 30% to 39%. Ironically, however, when asked about specific coercive techniques that Republicans endorse, more Republicans have become more restrictive in terms of what they regard as acceptable...</blockquote><br />Even after Republican opposition to torture shrunk ("considerable contraction in opposition"), a very strong majority -- 59% -- of the GOP faithful remained in opposition.&nbsp;<br /><span>Playing Orwell and calling torture "enhanced interrogation" still doesn't get most Americans to support torture:</span><blockquote>...wide majorities oppose most of the approved techniques, especially waterboarding. Disapproval of waterboarding approaches that of electroshock, which is for many the worst and most extreme form of physical coercion. Few approved techniques garner much public support beyond sleep deprivation, stress positions, and "noise bomb."</blockquote><blockquote><br /></blockquote><span>The pro-torture faction engaged in the standard human fantasy that lots of people agree with them:</span><blockquote>Our survey shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans overestimated the level of national support for torture. But more important, these misperceptions are not evenly distributed across the population. The more strongly an individual supports torture, the larger the gap in his or her perception. Those who believe that torture is "often" justified--a mere 15% of the public--think that more than a third of the public agrees with them. The 30% who say that torture can "sometimes" be justified believe that 62% of Americans do as well, and think that another 8% "often" approve of torture.</blockquote><br /><blockquote>Revealingly, those people most opposed to torture--29% of the public--are the most accurate in how they perceive public attitudes on the topic. They overestimate the proportion of the public who "sometimes" approve of torture by 10%, underestimate the proportion of the public who "often" approve of torture by 10%, and perceive the rest of the public with near precision.</blockquote><blockquote><br /></blockquote><span>What's odd, though, is that journalists bought it</span>. &nbsp;The media ignored the data and took the pro-torture faction's impressions as representing reality:<blockquote>And journalists believed them, whether they were liberal or not, for or against torture, Europeans or Americans. This is a mystery, because the evidence was always at their fingertips.</blockquote><br />My inner conspiracy nut says that the mainstream media ignored the data because the media is part of the power structure that creates our national narrative -- more specifically, in this case, the MSM acted mostly as stenographers for the Bush administration's talking points -- and the data didn't fit the narrative. &nbsp;(We saw this most pointedly in the "justification" for invading and occupying Iraq.)<br />Once again, we see that what we don't know really can hurt us. &nbsp;Or, as Sherlock Holmes said, "How dangerous it always is to reason from insufficient data."]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Humans are such a funny species</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2010/07/humans-are-such-a-funny-specie.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/americandad//1198.342949</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-07T21:43:17Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-08T04:45:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[ Jindal Signs 'Gun-In-Church' Bill, Allowing Congregants To Bring Concealed Weapons To Worship&nbsp;Well, if the wingnuts are going to do&nbsp;this sort of thing, perhaps Jindal is on to something....Explain to me how this is acceptableFact, the world has divided into...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>AmericanDad</name>
      <uri>http://filterednews.wordpress.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7325" label="Arizona" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="586" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5523" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7171" label="hypocrisy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3427" label="Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6319" label="racist" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/americandad/">
      <![CDATA[ <br /><span><p><span><br /><a href="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/undergod-2.jpg"><img title="undergod (2)" src="http://filterednews.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/undergod-2.jpg?w=203" alt="" width="203" height="300" /></a><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/07/guns-church-jindal/">Jindal Signs 'Gun-In-Church' Bill, Allowing Congregants To Bring Concealed Weapons To Worship</a>&nbsp;</span>Well, if the wingnuts are going to do<a href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/07/28/in-tennessee-eliminationism-is-no-longer-just-a-joke/">&nbsp;this sort of thing</a>, perhaps Jindal is on to something....</p><p><span><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7922">Explain to me how this is acceptable</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Fact, the world has divided into rich and poor as at no time in our history. The richest 2% own more than half the household wealth in the world. The richest 10% hold 85% of total global assets and the bottom half of humanity owns less than 1% of the wealth in the world. The three richest men in the world have more money than the poorest 48 countries.</p></blockquote><p>Some folks better start praying that there is no Hell.</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/gopers-blast-the-new-great-satan-obama-medicare-appointee-donald-berwick.php?ref=fpi">Obama's appointment for CMS is brilliant and universally respected within medicine -- so of course the GOPers hate him.</a></span></p><p><b><br /></b></p></span>]]>
      <![CDATA[<span><p><span><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20009642-10391695.html">Define "controversial opinion"</a>&nbsp;</span>I'm guessing that translates into "opinions contrary to those of the person in charge." &nbsp;Anyway, TSA&nbsp;employees aren't allowed access to them, although they can still x-ray through your clothes and see your naughty bits.</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/ga-gov-dem-the-rest-of-the-country-is-laughing-at-us----and-its-costing-us-jobs.php?ref=fpblg">Mama always said stupid is as stupid does</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"It's hard for industry to take us seriously when the Legislature ... passes bills about microchips in the brain, and talks about seceding from the Union."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2010/07/03/2010-07-03_more_to_mad_mels_ranting_tapes.html">Polite quote of the day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"His penchant for anti-Semitic and racist diatribes reveals the actor's (Mel Gibson) fundamental character flaw," the Rev. Jesse Jackson told RadarOnline.com. "He needs help."</p></blockquote><p>The reverend is far,<span>&nbsp;far&nbsp;</span>more polite than I would be. &nbsp;This, he says to his former girlfriend:</p><blockquote><p>"If you get raped by a pack of n------, it will be your fault," Gibson says on the audio clips, according to RadarOnline.com.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://goo.gl/sbOX">China can't handle the truth&nbsp;</a></span>Putting US geologist behind bars for 8 years. &nbsp;<a href="http://goo.gl/kX9d">An environmentalist, too</a>. &nbsp;Seems there's an anti-intellectual crackdown going on. &nbsp;Are they talking to the Tealanders?</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/az-vets-cinco-mayo/">More overt racism from Arizona</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Last week, 25 members of Arizona's "largest American Legion Post" in Apache Junction voted "to ban celebrations of Cinco de Mayo" at their organization. Since the Post celebrated the day regularly over the years, the ban "horrified" 86-year-old former Army corporal Harry Robert Warren, who cast the only dissenting vote against the resolution....</p><p>Post Commander Felix Gonzalez, the son of a Mexican-American father, was "blindsided" by the resolution, saying, "My jaw dropped. 'What is this [veteran who proposed it] thinking of?'" Believing that the vote "doesn't reflect the opinions of the overall membership of approximately 2,500," Gonzalez "hopes members overturn the decision."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/07/the_bible_belt_can_never_impro.php?utm_source=combinedfeed&amp;utm_medium=rss">Speaking of anti-intellectualism, here's what you get when you confuse science and religion</a></span>:</p><blockquote><p>"How can like an African-American person evolve from a white person? We're different skin."</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/george-allen-fox-news/">George "Macaca"&nbsp;Allen isn't the first Republican to recognize Fox News' value to the GOP.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024607.php">Too twisted not to note</a></span>&nbsp;Wingnut candidate for Senate goes undercover to get a makeover from professional pols in DC, then threatens to sue when her opponent shows the world what she was for before she was scrubbed.</p><blockquote><p>In a press release, the Reid campaign didn't sound too worried about litigation: "Just to be clear to Sharron Angle and her handlers, it's called free speech and it's nearly absolute under the First Amendment. (We know, these 'big Constitutional issues' are tough for you -- like when you said separation of Church &amp; State was "unconstitutional" exactly one week ago.) The question is: what will Sharron Angle do now to hide her extreme views on killing Social Security and eliminating the Department of Education from Nevada voters? Perhaps she's checking to see if there are any Second Amendment remedies."</p></blockquote><p>Somebody promise me this will be a movie some day.</p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/node/38205">2008 prediction come true:&nbsp;</a></span>"Money sources will tighten and corporations will hoard cash in an effort to make whichever Democrat is elected a one-term wonder."</p><p><span><a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/38212">The ugly, inconvenient truth is that the Radical Reckless Right is dripping with bigotry.</a></span>&nbsp;If it's not "PC"* to say so, tough.</p><blockquote><p>I'm awfully glad that racism is no longer mainstream on the right anymore or this man might have the most popular radio show in the country with 25 million listeners a week. Or this absurdity of a scandal trumped up by a GOP hitman might be breathlessly discussed by Republican operatives as the "sleeper issue for the 2010 midterms."</p><p>Thank goodness we don't have to worry about that anymore.</p></blockquote><p>Rush's intellect and ability are to Obama's what bumper stickers are to quantum physics, so his comments drip with irony in addition to bigotry. &nbsp;(*"PC" used in the perverted pejorative sense favored by the prejudiced, not in its actual sense.)</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/senor-legitimate-iraq-safer/">Isn't this, however it's answered, begging the question?</a></span></p><blockquote><p>[T]he end of Saddam Hussein's brutal regime represents a considerable global good, and a nascent democratic Iraqi republic allied with the United States could potentially yield benefits in the future.</p><p>But when weighing those possible benefits against the costs of the Iraq intervention, there is simply no conceivable calculus by which Operation Iraqi Freedom can be judged to have been a successful or worthwhile policy. The war was intended to show the extent of America's power. It succeeded only in showing its limits.</p></blockquote><p>The presumption behind any such discussion is that the end justifies the means. &nbsp;It falls under the logical fallacy of "pious fraud." &nbsp; It's a logical fallacy, of course, but it's also been a widely recognized moral failing at least since about the year 400, when Saint Augustine wrote&nbsp;<span>De Mendacio</span>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<span>Contra Medacium</span>.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/07/beck-mormon-christian/">Evangelical Wingnuts vs Beck</a>&nbsp;</span>Is there a way both sides can lose?</p><p><span><a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/jon-stewart-fox-news-is-wrong-about-unemployment----just-ask-the-economist-tied-up-in-my-closet-vide.php?ref=fpi">Leave it to Jon Stewart to smack down Fox's stupidity (again)</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://crooksandliars.com/brad-reed/americas-weird-we-must-be-nice-rich-peop">America's Weird "We-Must-Be-Nice-to-Rich-People" Doctrine</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/confusion-at-the-washington-post/">On the silliness of claiming "objectivity"</a></span></p><blockquote><p>(A)re readers really going to be "confused" if someone "appears to report" some new factual information one day and then "opines" about it the next? Is it really true that opinion is identical to "dogma" and therefore entirely distinct from "analysis"? Why is there a "conflict" or "appearance of conflict" if people gathering factual information about the conduct of politicians and government officials also have opinions about that conduct? For that matter, why is there so much emphasis on appearance and how things seem rather than on what's actually happening?</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/a-hypothetical/">Our corporate media's double standard</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/tea-party-gop/">The damage done by the Radical Reckless Right&nbsp;</a></span>Poll: Tea Party Supporters And Republican Base Are Virtually 'Indistinguishable,' Share Similar Ideologies</p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024605.php">The GOP can't seem to lance the boil on the party's butt</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The Washington Post noted that, in some cases, "fundraisers and donors lack confidence in the organization's ability to manage its resources," and as a result, party committees like the Republican Governors Association and National Republican Senatorial Committee will play a more significant role than usual.</p></blockquote><p>Look, Republicans just are no longer good at managing&nbsp;<span>any</span>&nbsp;resources, as evidenced by the Dark Days of Dubya. &nbsp;Only Michael Steele's RNC would&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007060008">pay $12,000 to an unpaid adviser</a>. &nbsp;Even their&nbsp;<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024604.php">unofficial front groups can't seem to count the beans</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Verini sheds light on an executive who spends money almost as fast as he raises it -- if not faster -- and whose extreme opposition to regulations has led companies like Apple Inc. to drop their membership in the organization. The Chamber of Commerce, by Donohue's admission, turns out to be a front group of sorts, one that involves itself in lobbying for the least-defensible industry practices without leaving industry fingerprints on the effort. Verini also reveals a fragile organization with financial red flags and rebellious regional chambers of commerce that are taking steps to distance themselves from Donohue's national chamber.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=the_new_black_panther_party_ca#120368">More hypocritical faux outrage from the Reckless Radical Right</a></span>&nbsp;-- this time, Civil Rights. &nbsp;The article is also a good reminder (lesson for those who'd not known it before) of what Dubya and his racist buddies did to Civil Rights enforcement.</p><p><span><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/rove-citizens-united-crossroads/">The fruits of judicial activism on the Right&nbsp;</a></span>Rove Admits His 'Shadow RNC' Attack Group Functions Largely Because Of The Citizens United Decision. &nbsp;But then, that was the point.</p><p><span><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7872190/Planck-telescope-reveals-universe-image.html">The first photo of the full universe</a>&nbsp;</span>I'm having trouble seeing myself in the picture....</p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/states-corporate-welfare/">Like The Federal Government, States Just Can't Quit Wasteful Corporate Welfare</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://newmexicoindependent.com/58817/more-immigration-doesnt-mean-more-crime-libertarian-think-tank-says">Finding what so many others also have found: &nbsp;More immigration doesn't mean more crime,</a></span>&nbsp;libertarian think tank says</p><p><span><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/07/journalists-cover-bp-spill-felonies-40k.php">Journalists covering BP Spill face felonies, fines.</a></span>&nbsp;And that's just totally fine with the government, apparently.</p><p><span><a href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/06/perry-teachers/">The unbearable hypocrisy of Rick Perry</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/90983/shrinking-labor-force-masks-deepening-unemployment-crisis">Unemployment: Much worse than you think.</a></span></p><p><span>Notice the theme</span></p><blockquote><p>"I think we're headed for a civil war."&nbsp;&nbsp;--&nbsp;<a href="http://blogrevolution.com/archives/2010/06/24/6082817.html">Glenn Beck</a></p><p>"Go to your Congressman's office and scream at him.&nbsp;&nbsp;If you're willing to do the time, have a swing at him."<span><span>&nbsp;--&nbsp;<a href="143/fetch%3EUID%3E.vze4nz7a%3E31183">Bill Owens</a></span></span><a href="143/fetch%3EUID%3E.vze4nz7a%3E31183"></a></p><p>"The most divisive President in history is itching for a civil war.&nbsp;&nbsp;And at the rate he is going, he is going to get one."&nbsp;--<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201006230053">&nbsp;Pamela Geller</a></p><p>"I almost feel as though Obama's trying to&nbsp;create a civil war in America for his own reasons."&nbsp;&nbsp;--&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201006210035">Michael Weiner</a></p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/welcome-airport-security-wizard-will-be-you-shortly-en">Welcome to Airport Security. A "Wizard" Will Be With You Shortly to Engage in Racial Profiling and Violate Your Privacy.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Let's talk about a little known program being deployed across the nations' airports called SPOT, Screening Passengers by Observation Technique. According to an article in Nature News, by Sharon Weinberger, America's Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has trained 3,000 officers to detect and infer future behavior, in what can only be described as a psychic effort, to determine an individual's intent. The TSA claims that these screeners are trained to observe and identify people who appear to be deceptive and planning hostile acts.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/drug-law-reform/aclus-wrongful-termination-suit-against-wal-mart-highlights-medical-marijuana-p">ACLU's Wrongful Termination Suit Against Wal-Mart Highlights Medical Marijuana Patient Discrimination</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/drowning/?10981">Drowning does not look like drowning.</a></span></p><blockquote><p>There is very little splashing, no waving, and no yelling or calls for help of any kind. &nbsp;To get an idea of just how quiet and undramatic from the surface drowning can be, consider this: &nbsp;It is the number two cause of accidental death in children, age 15 and under (just behind vehicle accidents) - of the approximately 750 children who will drown next year, about 375 of them will do so within 25 yards of a parent or other adult. &nbsp;In ten percent of those drownings, the adult will actually watch them do it, having no idea it is happening (source: CDC).</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://marbury.typepad.com/marbury/2010/07/your-friends-agree-with-you-less-than-you-think.html">I'm not as crazy as you are</a></span>&nbsp;A new study suggests that we tend to proceed with the warm, fuzzy and largely false idea that our friends agree with our political views. &nbsp;(Heh. &nbsp;When you're "dad" to six, including three teens, it is made abundantly clear on a daily basis that&nbsp;<span>no one</span>&nbsp;agrees with you.)</p><p><span><a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2010/07/0083023">Quote of the Day</a></span></p><blockquote><p>The general unsightliness of the capitol makes it a fitting home for today's Arizona legislature, which is composed almost entirely of dimwits, racists, and cranks.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0&amp;feature=player_embedded">Crisis in capitalism</a></span>&nbsp;(very good video)</p><p><span><a href="http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2010/07/five-complete-batshit-insane-things.html">Rude Pundit rips Palin</a></span></p><blockquote><p>"Something has to be done urgently to stop the out of control Obama-Reid-Pelosi spending machine, and no government agency should be immune from budget scrutiny. We must make sure, however, that we do nothing to undermine the effectiveness of our military."</p><p>Read that again - in one sentence, she says no agency should be immune; in the next, she says, "Well, except the military." Later, she explicitly says, "Cut spending in other departments - apart from defense." The only purpose of the first part is to say "Obama-Reid-Pelosi," as if it's an unholy trinity of cash-engorged corruption.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/07/04/1715114/no-fly-list-often-snares-wrong.html">ACLU files lawsuit against Holder et al over no-fly list</a></span></p><blockquote><p>Here's how it is when your name is on the no-fly list:</p><p>They won't let you fly.</p><p>They won't tell you why.</p><p>They won't show you the list.</p><p>They won't take your name off the list.</p><p>They won't give you any way to appeal.</p></blockquote><p><span><a href="http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20100707_Lingle_vetoes_civil-unions_bill.html">If you determine Civil Rights by majority rule, the rights of minorities will always be screwed.</a></span></p><p><span><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_07/024608.php">Was this Dem crazy&nbsp;<span>before&nbsp;</span>the election or did it come on recently?</a>&nbsp;</span>Make toys of me!</p></span>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 

