« Where is my apocalyptic, scorched-earth smear campaign? | akbarjenkins's Blog | A report from the ground in Raleigh, NC »
I'm Akbar the Teacher
I'm married to Saira the Researcher. My mom is Sandy the Truck Part Maker, and my grandpa is Darrell the Carpenter. Where is Susan Powter the Insanity Stopper when you need her?
I've always thought the phrase "Joe Six Pack" was a condescending label created by media elites to describe the ordinary man. It has a touch of the same sneer that went into the term "hard hats," which was used to describe traditionally-minded working class folks who hated hippies back in the days of Richard Nixon. So it is extremely puzzling to me when vicious dunces like Sarah Palin use "Joe Six Pack" to describe their supporters, blithely unaware of how out-of-touch and belittling it sounds.
They've brought the same sort of rhetorical tone deafness to the "Joe the Plumber" campaign. Never mind the factual details that the guy is neither Joe nor a plumber, as Linda Richman might say. The whole idea of Joe the Plumber stinks. It's like saying Jimmy the Shoeshine Boy. I mean, give me a break, people. Palin has now introduced us to Ed the Dairyman and Tito the Builder - the <i>builder</i> - in an attempt to franchise this unbelievably stupid concept. I'm not kidding. Is Clifford the Big Red Dog going to come out for McCain/Palin next?
Thus we get the pathetic spectacle of well-heeled rich kids from the College Republicans dressing up in overalls and ballcaps, waving plungers and signs that say "I AM JOE." The conservative blogs have tried to push a movement in which McCain supporters post "This I Believe"-style statements about their lives and their hatred of Obama, under the heading, "I Am Joe."
This is what you'd expect from a country where a guy with 12 houses can describe anyone making up to $5 million a year as "middle class," and he can speak up for the little guy by choosing a flirty dingbat with no qualifications except her folksy flair as a running mate. This is the logical course of action for a party that decries "class warfare" when its entire campaign is based on class warfare -- riling up its supporters' resentment of media elites while proposing to pick the pockets of regular taxpayers and transfer the funds to the wealthiest among us. Of course they want to talk about every Ed, Joe, and Tito they can find, because it allows them to feign concern for people they view as ignorant pawns in their game.
Their disdain for the working class is revealed by the fact that they talk about them like they were children's toys. Bob the Builder, anyone?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/joeplumber.jpg
I've always thought the phrase "Joe Six Pack" was a condescending label created by media elites to describe the ordinary man. It has a touch of the same sneer that went into the term "hard hats," which was used to describe traditionally-minded working class folks who hated hippies back in the days of Richard Nixon. So it is extremely puzzling to me when vicious dunces like Sarah Palin use "Joe Six Pack" to describe their supporters, blithely unaware of how out-of-touch and belittling it sounds.
They've brought the same sort of rhetorical tone deafness to the "Joe the Plumber" campaign. Never mind the factual details that the guy is neither Joe nor a plumber, as Linda Richman might say. The whole idea of Joe the Plumber stinks. It's like saying Jimmy the Shoeshine Boy. I mean, give me a break, people. Palin has now introduced us to Ed the Dairyman and Tito the Builder - the <i>builder</i> - in an attempt to franchise this unbelievably stupid concept. I'm not kidding. Is Clifford the Big Red Dog going to come out for McCain/Palin next?
Thus we get the pathetic spectacle of well-heeled rich kids from the College Republicans dressing up in overalls and ballcaps, waving plungers and signs that say "I AM JOE." The conservative blogs have tried to push a movement in which McCain supporters post "This I Believe"-style statements about their lives and their hatred of Obama, under the heading, "I Am Joe."
This is what you'd expect from a country where a guy with 12 houses can describe anyone making up to $5 million a year as "middle class," and he can speak up for the little guy by choosing a flirty dingbat with no qualifications except her folksy flair as a running mate. This is the logical course of action for a party that decries "class warfare" when its entire campaign is based on class warfare -- riling up its supporters' resentment of media elites while proposing to pick the pockets of regular taxpayers and transfer the funds to the wealthiest among us. Of course they want to talk about every Ed, Joe, and Tito they can find, because it allows them to feign concern for people they view as ignorant pawns in their game.
Their disdain for the working class is revealed by the fact that they talk about them like they were children's toys. Bob the Builder, anyone?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/joeplumber.jpg
Advertisement





My oldest friend is literally Bob the Builder, does remodeling and construction, who found most of his clients in Bethesda and Chevy Chase MD. He hasn't had any business since April. If those swells had been investing in companies that made stuff, instead of trying for the windfall route to wealth, Bob would still be redoing bathrooms and building decks.
Call me Tom the Fiddler, union member.
October 21, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should have added... it's like something the character Bill said in "Kill Bill 2." Superman's alter ego, Clark Kent, was the superhero's own image of what humans were like - fallible, bumbling, and weak.
In the same way, Sarah Palin reflects the Republicans' idea of what normal people are like. In other words, they think we're morons.
October 21, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Akbar, this post made me laugh out loud. Thanks. ;)
October 21, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Same.
Clifford The Big Red Dog - today's winner!
October 21, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Is Clifford the Big Red Dog going to come out for McCain/Palin next?"
HAHAHAHAHA! Great stuff!
October 21, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
You put your finger on it.
I am a construction worker in NYC. The assumption that having a certain job defines the possible range of interests of the person doing the job is a profoundly elitist point of view.
I see and hear the idea disproved everyday.
October 21, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, so true... my poor mom, such a smart person, who works a blue-collar job and fights for her union and so on, she gets lumped into some kind of idiotic "Nascar Dad"/"Hockey Mom" category, as if it's completely "out of character" for her to be informed and concerned and actually know about the issues...
Being in NYC, I'm sure you see the ass-backwards class assumptions go every which way, from the latte-sipper down to the bum on the street, all of whom think people have to be a certain way based on how they dress or what job they do and so on.
October 22, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very well said. The primary point I get from this is what aggravates me the most about the Republicans - their ability to ascribe to their enemies their own worst characteristics.
McCain the blue blood child of privilege labeling Obama an elitist - the child of a single mother who succeeded on his own hard work and brains. Unbelievable.
October 22, 2008 2:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am pulling for Joe-the-vice-president.
October 22, 2008 5:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bob the Builder is on Obama's side. They even share a slogan: "Yes we can!"
October 22, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink