This user has not started their blog yet!
- So, why did they have to bring any amendment at all? Did the pro-choice caucus really want the vote that
- You're right, I screwed up, sorry. :(
- But for the record, I don't think you're a shill, I just think you really like Whole Foods and didn't
- I'm not really interested anymore in your quantum superposition as to whether Mackey did or did not offer something other
- I never said he offered nothing worthy of discussion (scattered here and there amongst a pile of misinformation and propaganda).
- So you're back to saying that they have a right not to be boycotted. Fine. They chose to work there,
- I made this post a long time ago. But, yeah, look at the responses to the post he links to
- Note that this is the very definition of ad hominem, but for the record, I've been posting comments for years,
- He's still wrong, but at least he didn't claim that I was abrogating someone's rights.
- This is incoherent. The majority of paragraphs in his op-ed are dedicated to imaginary problems he finds with the current
- I didn't say that we have a right not to be hit with ad hominems. I'm not even sure they're
- Well. Okay, then. Just go ahead and make sure you've got enough organic cane sugar in your diet.
- That's right, because why he's trying to stop what's in Congress with his op-ed.
- A tax cut is still deregulation. So you're right, one is different from none and he offered none. But I'm
- And as I explained, if you're accusing me of abrogating a right not to be boycotted, your denying me my
