TPMCafe
« September 27, 2009 - October 3, 2009 | Home | October 11, 2009 - October 17, 2009 »

Week of October 4, 2009 - October 10, 2009

The BBC's Embarrassing Denialism


On Friday, the BBC's in-house climate correspondent, Paul Hudson, wrote an utter failure of an article about global warming. Sadly, the right has picked it up; having BBC attached to such uninformed denialism allows the ignorant, anti-science crowd crow that the left is losing on global warming (science, again, with its political leanings).

So, a takedown of the BBC's article is below (x-posted at this forum):

What happened to good journalism? The BBC should be embarrassed to have published this article. Let's go through it line by line.

This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

So far, so good. Nothing wrong there. (Although it's not a surprise that 1998 was the warmest year on record--it was the strongest El Nino year of the 20th century [link below].) Oh, and the headline is not a surprise: news organizations benefit from consumer attention.

But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

Whoops! Already inaccurate. While it's true that no year has been as hot as 98, that's because 98 was an outlier, well above the trend line. But there has been, in fact, a continued warming trend. AGW does not claim that every year will be hotter than the previous year; on the contrary, it argues that, over time, the global trend will continue to increase in correlation with accelerated amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere.

And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.

Just a wretched sentence. "Our climate models did not forecast it." What does that "it" refer to? Just go back and check--there's not a clear antecedent in the previous sentence. (Of course, the temperature trend has continued upward, just as models predicted, even though the climate models have actually underpredicted the temperature rise.)

Also, what an oddly constructed phrase: "man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet." That "thought to be" blurs the issue. How about a rewrite: "man-made carbon dioxide, the gas argued to be responsible for warming the planet by hundreds of thousands of scholarly articles and that no peer-reviewed scientific work has refuted in any meaningful way." And if you'd like to mention Benny Peiser's response that claims there's plenty of scientific debate, you should read this first.

Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming.

Also, flat earth theorists continue to "passionately and consistently argue" that the earth is flat. Young earth creationists continue to "passionately and consistently argue" that the fossil record is utterly meaningless for determining the age of the planet. They don't have science on their side, but they sure do have tenacity!

Sceptics argue that the warming we observed was down to the energy from the Sun increasing. After all 98% of the Earth's warmth comes from the Sun.

Just to note here, remember it for later: AGW acknowledges solar activity in global temperatures.

The scientists' main approach was simple: to look at solar output and cosmic ray intensity over the last 30-40 years, and compare those trends with the graph for global average surface temperature.

And the results were clear. "Warming in the last 20 to 40 years can't have been caused by solar activity," said Dr Piers Forster from Leeds University, a leading contributor to this year's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

But one solar scientist Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction, a company specialising in long range weather forecasting, disagrees.

Who is Piers Corbyn? What is Weatheraction? Guess what? He makes predictions about the weather, predictions that are sometimes accurate and sometimes inaccurate, and he doesn't make public his method. Why, he must be a reliable source on a scientific issue!

He claims that solar charged particles impact us far more than is currently accepted, so much so he says that they are almost entirely responsible for what happens to global temperatures.

He is so excited by what he has discovered that he plans to tell the international scientific community at a conference in London at the end of the month.

Ah, he has a claim. Has he released any evidence? Nope. What will his evidence consist of? No one knows. Is this newsworthy? Yes. Why? Because Piers Corbyn is "so excited" about the claim he making, which the author of the BBC article has seen none of the evidence for.

If proved correct, this could revolutionise the whole subject.

If I dropped an apple, yet gravity did not pull the apple to the ground, that could revolutionize the whole subject. And you know what else is possible? Someone systematically refuting hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed articles worth of research that argues for global warming (and, just to reiterate, almost no peer-reviewed scientific articles refuting it). Sure, it could happen. Why not? Also, it could rain frogs tomorrow.

What is really interesting at the moment is what is happening to our oceans. They are the Earth's great heat stores.
. . . .
For much of the 1980s and 1990s, it was in a positive cycle, that means warmer than average. And observations have revealed that global temperatures were warm too.

But in the last few years it [the ocean] has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down.

Do news organizations have fact checkers anymore? Has the ocean been losing its warmth and been starting to cool down? Check the link.

But those scientists who are equally passionate about man's influence on global warming argue that their science is solid.

This seems like it would be a good place in the BBC article to mention that the scientists who are passionate about their science being solid actually have science on their side. (If you're scoring at home, that's hundreds of thousands of articles to one.

The UK Met Office's Hadley Centre, responsible for future climate predictions, says it incorporates solar variation and ocean cycles into its climate models, and that they are nothing new.

In fact, the centre says they are just two of the whole host of known factors that influence global temperatures - all of which are accounted for by its models.

In addition, say Met Office scientists, temperatures have never increased in a straight line, and there will always be periods of slower warming, or even temporary cooling.

What is crucial, they say, is the long-term trend in global temperatures. And that, according to the Met office data, is clearly up.

I find it interesting how the article treats the evidenceless claim by Piers Corbyn and the UK Met Office, which relies on constantly updated scientific data, as equal claims.

To confuse the issue even further, last month Mojib Latif, a member of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) says that we may indeed be in a period of cooling worldwide temperatures that could last another 10-20 years.

Actually, this doesn't "confuse the issue even further." To clear up the confusion, you just have to read a couple of paragraphs down:

But [Latif] makes it clear that he has not become a sceptic; he believes that this cooling will be temporary, before the overwhelming force of man-made global warming reasserts itself.

So, to sum up: Mojib Latif sees a brief period of cooling coming, which he "believes" will be followed by warming. Interesting that he just "believes" this. On what is his belief based? Oh, if only the article could tell us. But, for some reason, it chooses not to. Journamalism at its finest!

One thing is for sure. It seems the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over. Indeed some would say it is hotting up.

Oh, a couple other things are for sure. One, the "debate" over global warming is only taking place outside of where scientists publish their research findings. Two, that "some would say it is hotting up" is, sadly, the sentence Mr. Hudson clearly put the most work into.

A few thoughts on Oktoberfest


 

Celebrating the autumn harvest in south florida when it is 95 degrees is a little tough to handle.

 

Going to a german event with lots of civilians wearing military uniforms is unnerving, even if you are german. (the civil air patrol did the parking.  Lots of 12-18 year olds in camo.  freaky)

 

Bag pipes, even when played well, are not pleasing to the ear.

 

Anyone can do the chicken dance.

 

German people as a whole are not very attractive compared to say brazilians or italians, but after 4 or 5 boots or lager, it becomes less important.

 

there are a lot of names for sausage

 

at any event, there is always at least one girl who will just take it too far, at this event it was a young buxom blond in a tight tutonic corset, fishnet stockings, and knee length black leather stilleto heels paired with a very short frilly Oktoberfest skirt.  However, being it is a family event, she was also there caring for her 85 year old grandma.  The juxtoposition was interesting. 

 

Carnival ride operators apparently do not have good dental plans.

 

 

 

CULPABILITY


Little Caesar

original poster (1930)


What if an attorney wrote a letter/memo to a client explaining how she did not have to withhold taxes on her employee's wages.  What if a lawyer wrote a memo telling the President of the United States that he should feel free to torture certain people as defined in the memo.


Read more »

Mr. Michael Steele


I think Mr. Steele should keep his mouth shut about anything concerning the President or anything else in Politics. Apparently he is not the one that should be in that position.

All he does is make a fool out of himself. Trust me his party LOVE'S that coming from him, being who he is a B--A--K man. I just love for him to open his mouth so he can dig the hold for himself deeper.

Keep digging Steele until we can't find you in the hold any more, and that won't be long.

Shirl

Nobel Peace Prize


Nobel Peace Prize is recognition of special merit in the fields of connecting people, disarmament or reduction of global or regional military potential, political and other education and the maintenance of peace conferences. This award, like the other Nobel prizes, donations and manufacturer of Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel, and 1,901th each year awards 10th December in Oslo on the day of his death.

Petar's www presence:
HostGator coupons
Hostgator Coupon

IMPLOSION OF HATE



IMPLOSION OF HATE


Is it possible we have been judged and found though less then perfect perhaps pushing our cart along a trail leading towards the high road; the high road we once built.   My how our race down hill was ran.   Sure we let them tie across our eyes fear.  I too was angry but knew not at who, I too was scared but of what.   Too many are now pushing their own cart load of hate and discontent, buckets of rage and boxes of ignorance, books full of past lies and rolled posters posturing as patriotism.   It was indeed too easy chasing our load down hill; too fast among the ruts we were stuck within.  Now as we look back at the wreckage piled below one must wonder why, one must ask how were we allowed to crash into each other, and also do we now bear scars never to be erased?   Now our leader is awarded for peace amid the war only half won.   Will we than offer only half measure or is it possible we join and offer in measure most full to empower our implosion of hate?



M. Paul

Snake-oil snakepit


"Always keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out."

- Albert Einstein

After years in the hocus-pocus fantasy land of the Bay Area, where the margin separating straitjacket dementia from New-Age revelation is virtually nonexistent, I discovered in the mid-'90s Michael Shermer's Skeptic magazine. And it saved, if not my life, then certainly my sanity. 

Read more »

Re: Hitler's Nobel


That's been corrected--but my fear:

Wilson's Nobel

Why are we in Afghanistan?


I do not know what to do about Afghanistan. Though I was in high school when this question arose about another war, I did not know what to do about Vietnam either, but I did learn a few things watching what happened and reading about it for many years since.

And it is this: deciding what to do is not helped by politicians announcing what they would do or suggesting that anything other than saluting and doing exactly what some field commander is treasonous, wimpy or surrender.

Read more »

Obama's Peace Prize and Right-Wing reaction


There have been a lot of people who have questioned why, after only nine months in office, Obama deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. No sitting U.S. president since Woodrow Wilson has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, making this a very unusual decision. Why did the Nobel Foundation make their surprising decision? Equally puzzling is why did the Republicans have reacted in such an extremely partisan way to that decision?

The answer to those puzzles is becoming clear. Consider first why Obama deserves the award, then what the reaction of the American right wing to the award shows about them. Finally, consider what the award of the Peace Prize to Obama has done to advance the cause of world peace.

Read more »

Life, Liberty and What-Was-That-Last-One?


Before we had our Constituation, we had our manifesto: The Declaration of Independence. It contains one of the cornerstones on which our country's ideology is founded: the opinion that all men are endowed with the unalienable rights of "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness".

That 5-person committee of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Robert R. Livingston, and Roger Sherman were either propheptic or they enacted a self-fulfilling prophecy. Those three linchpins upon which America was built have become three of the most heated sources of debate and outrage in our country. In regard to Life, one need only consider the divide over capital punishment, abortion, or euthanasia. How earnestly we fight over freedom of speech, freedom of religion, a right to privacy and for what we consider our god-given Liberty.

But what of the pursuit of Happiness. How do you define Happiness? How do you achieve Happiness? How important is Happiness? Ask yourself the question: "What makes me happy." For me, it is the hope that one day I will be able to have a family and a place of my own. I imagine many of you might have the same hope. For the rest of you, it may be something else, equally satisfying and joyous. Whatever that may be, just hold that in your mind.

Are you pursuing that Happiness? According to the Continental Congress you have a right to do so. An unalienable right. They were pretty good at covering the Life and the Liberty, there must be a reason for that last one. They spent 17 days working on the first draft of the Declaration, and Thomas Jefferson was no slouch.

So if law and governance of that law provides us with Life and Liberty, it should committed to providing us with the pursuit of Happiness. When it comes to my initial conception of what makes me happy, that means I have the right to pursue all legals means to start a family and own a piece of land that I can call home. It also means that whatever your happiness may be, you too have a right to pursue it.

Everything follows from this idea. We cannot pursue happiness if we are too sick and cannot afford to keep ourselves well enough to work and earn a living, which is really our only means to achieve worthwhile happiness. We are denied pursuit if laws are in place which unfairly allow one group of people to attain happiness over the other. The good neighbor policy stands; one group should not be allowed to pursue happiness if it is as at the cost of another group's pursuit. This can be translated to the freedoms that the ultra-rich and upper class have in comparison to those that the poor and destitute do not.

Obama is not a socialist. He is not a marxist. He is not Hitler (Hitler's platform was built on the backs of those whom he would deny even a moment's happiness). He is a Happiness pursuer. He has taken it upon himself and his Presidency to set in motion a series of events and legislation that will lead to a country, and in all hopes, a world focused on pursuing happiness.

Those on the far right of the political spectrum fear this because they feel that if someone else prospers, they suffer. If more people are given opportunity and the same tools that they have, then the fear is that it will ultimately lead to their loss of power, their being in the minority, their inability to pursue happiness. Perhaps this is just a projection of what they would do in place of the underprivileged were they underprivileged themselves. Perhaps it is because this socio-political sect of American humanity believes only in man's self-interest and not his desire for social equity and harmony.

Perhaps those who can truly pursue happiness wish to keep it all for themselves.

Whatever the case, President Obama is the first President in my lifetime who seems to be taking the Declaration of Independence to heart. All are welcome. All have these unalienable rights. That is one thing that is as true as it was in 1776 as it is now.

Please don't overuse the healthcare system


I have been reading lots of blogs about healthcare reform and I recently found myself corresponding with policy wonks who write about healthcare at a level that is difficult for me to comprehend.  These are PhD-types who write reports about Medicare and health insurance with statistics and cost analysis - and charge $900 for a copy of their reports.

I learned something very interesting from my correspondence about how Medicare is supposed to work, though I'm not sure I like it.

Apparently, people who have Medicare Supplements are costing Medicare more money than if they did not have these "Medigap" plans, which cover the gaps in Medicare coverage. According to one study, Medicare was designed with deductibles and co-insurance (20%) so that seniors would have to share in the cost of their health care. By sharing the cost, seniors would be unlikely to overuse the system, thus holding down Medicare's expenses.

But when people buy and pay for a Medicare Supplement ($100-$250/month) they can be 100% covered for their Medicare-covered healthcare costs and are likely to seek out more care.  Thus, these people will cost Medicare, which pays 80% of their bills, more money.

Here is something the the Incidental Economist wrote to me:

"As for health care use being in part dependent on OOP (out-of-pocket) cost: that's classic moral hazard, a standard concept in insurance. The Rand health insurance experiment is the classic study on this. To overly generalize, they found that greater OOP cost led to less use but had no significant impact on health outcomes. (This is, of course, controversial.) If true, or even mostly true, it suggests a lot of overuse of care that could be reduced by having folks face more of the cost. That's what consumer-driven health care is about, in part."

I understand this concept, but it kind of shocked me.  As an insurance agent I tell seniors that the best coverage for them is Medicare plus a Medicare Supplement plan F. This will cover just about 100% of their medical bills.  But I'm apparently undermining Medicare by helping these people get the most complete coverage possible.  And apparently they might use too much healthcare.

When people are diagnosed with cancer they must pay 20% for radiation and chemo therapy. If they have a Plan F Medicare Supplement they will see no medical bills. If they have only Medicare, they will face thousands of dollars in bills for their 20% of the cost. This is a major cause of bankruptcy for seniors.

Perhaps those who are 100% covered seek more help to try to save their lives, and I guess this is a bad thing according to economists and number crunchers.

2+1 Die, 19-1 hospitalized in Sweat Lodge at "The Secret" Shill's New Age Retreat


Credit where it's due, I first saw this story yesterday on Drudge, and it appears Breitbart broke it.

From AP

PHOENIX -- A sauna-like sweat lodge at an Arizona resort meant to provide spiritual cleansing became a crime scene Friday after two people died and others became ill during a two-hour session inside the crude structure.

In all, 21 of the 64 people crowded inside the sweat lodge Thursday evening were transported to hospitals. Four remained hospitalized Friday evening -- one in critical condition and the others in fair condition...Self-help expert and author James Arthur Ray rented the facility as part of his "Spiritual Warrior" retreat that began Oct. 3

James Arthur Ray is one of the main "experts" featured in the film, The Secret.  The movie happens to be one of Oprah's favorites, and she has featured its promoters and defenders, including JAR, on her programming.

The Secret, described as a self-help film, uses a documentary format to present the Law of Attraction. As described in the film, the "Law of Attraction" principle posits that feelings and thoughts can attract events, from the workings of the cosmos to interactions among individuals in their physical, emotional, and professional affairs. The film also suggests that there has been a strong tendency by those in positions of power to keep this central principle hidden from the public.
It's just tragic that these people were taken in by the pseudoscience of James Arthur Ray.  There must be little comfort for them -- they paid thousands of dollars for a healing, spiritual experience.  However he convinced himself that it was safe to squeeze more than 5 dozen people into a sweat lodge is beyond all logic.  I think of it as a PSA to warn people not to spend money on anything associated with this negligent fraudster Twithead.

Spread the word about The Secret.  Don't buy it; borrow it from the library if you absolutely have to watch it.  Same goes for the book (author Rhonda Byrne).

Coincidentally, The Simpson's parodied The Secret in their most recent episode, on Oct. 4th, which was one day after the "Spiritual Warrior" retreat began.  OR...maybe, the show's producers were aware of the concurrence, and were making a pointed joke to the New Age community...?

If so, then they would've had no idea that, very shortly, there would be a national spotlight shining on the subject.

Regarding: recent democratic behavior


That' s democratic, with a small 'd'; but it's intended to refer to something that individuals using the label Democrat seem to be starting to do.

There is this and then this.

Then this guy pops up.

It seems that Pelosi is moving assertively.

Then, there is Alan Grayson on Olympia Snowe, among other things. I recommend watching this one.

While not all of this is exactly like bringing guns to the knife fight, and is maybe more like aluminum bats for some; it's what I see as a movement toward democratic behavior.

Time will tell, I suppose.

Oscar Wilde on Lying


Excerpt from  The Decay of Lying.


CYRIL. What is the subject?

VIVIAN. I intend to call it 'The Decay of Lying: A Protest.'

CYRIL. Lying! I should have thought that our politicians kept up that habit.

VIVIAN. I assure you that they do not. They never rise beyond the level of misrepresentation, and actually condescend to prove, to discuss, to argue. How different from the temper of the true liar, with his frank, fearless statements, his superb irresponsibility, his healthy, natural disdain of proof of any kind! After all, what is a fine lie? Simply that which is its own evidence. If a man is sufficiently unimaginative to produce evidence in support of a lie, he might just as well speak the truth at once. No, the politicians won't do.

Promises, promises


(crossposted and edited from a comment I made on MJ Rosenberg's excellent post "Nobel Prize Honors America, Not Just Our President")
"the White House immediately keep its many verbal, written and campaign promises.."

Too many people in the middle and on the left have projected their own very personal, particular brand of "hope" into some kind of "promise" Obama made either on the campaign trail or in the White House since his inauguration.

It is a sad sort of group delusion that converted hopeful speeches into concrete promises, because we are all so desperate to see change.

But when that change hasn't matched the expectations curve, then suddenly Obama hasn't kept his "promises."

Too many people believe Obama promised them something he never really promised, he just spoke hopefully about change.

But now that the corporate-lackey Republican obstructionists have had their way with our antiquated system of government, and our hopes have been held back from flowing instantly into law, too many blame Obama for their own delusions, no matter how noble, being unrealized.

Obama promised change, and obviously the rest of the world recognizes that at least SOME of that change happened immediately, as awards like THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE prove.

But to the single-issue American zealots whose cause has yet to be vindicated, Obama's just another promise breaker.

Broaden your political perspective, folks, and learn to appreciate the baby steps we now actually have the power to take. Don't let your personal disappointment over your pet cause blind you to the hopeful reality that people like those on the Nobel committee see clearly, as outsiders looking in. 

And never forget, our adversaries in this instance aren't soldiers with weapons, it is the richest collection of greedy billionaires and wannabe billionaires to ever inhabit the earth, which they believe is theirs to abuse.

Solar Shingles heading to market? ABOUT TIME!


http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/07/dow-unveils-solar-shingles/?em
Too bad it's Dow. But regardless of the manufacturer, this is one of those "duh" answers that has been waiting for the fossil-fools to leave the White House before it could be released.  
During W's tenure, it was literally impossible compete with the coal-fired industry's billion dollar state-by-state lobby.  Alternatives were marginalized and defunded, while that old oxymoron "clean coal" was promoted with a lot more fossil-fuel industry money than EVER went towards developing those alternatives.  All those billions spent protecting pollution-generating generators should have been spent getting products like these solar shingles to the market sooner.

The Nobel Peace Prize is for us, not Obama.


I mean, let's be real, it's not as if he would have gotten the prize if he hadn't been president. So actually the prize is a prize for all of his voters since it wouldn't have been possible without them.

And don't you think THAT is the REAL reason the repubs are screaming, howling and foam-at-the-mouth mad???

Who actually is responsible for Obamas election, his voters or man himself who convinced them to vote for him is another matter entirely  ...

Of course he should NOT say that, he should say that it's a prize for all Americans in making the choice to return to the world. But we would know, and more importantly the RepuKes would know that it would NOT include them. Because they made another choice entirely: Scarah imPalin AKA the starter-of-the-Deather-movement (but I hear she turned on them AGAIN ...)

Cheney's not a war criminal


Not even evil.Neither was Sharon. Nor Arafat. Nor Gerry Adams.  Nor Curtis LeMay. Nor Mohammed Atta. Nor,  dare I say it, Osama Bin Laden..

They were all responsible for doing terrible things to other human beings: torturing them, incinerating them in a Birmingham pub , vaporizing a hundred thousand of them with one bomb . Or 9/11. But not because they are evil. They all thought they were doing  good; defending their own people by attacking their enemy.

We can deplore their choices. I do. Mostly.I Agreed with Hiroshima. But  to characterize them as criminals  is to adopt another  version of their own  behavior :ceasing to see them as  human beings , just cardboard characters in the long running morality play in our own heads. Enter the devil, Stage Left.  

Criticize them for faulty strategies. Or for employing means that are disproportionate to their ends.But not for being motiveless villains.

And stop clamoring for a War Crimes Tribunal. Or a Congressional hearing. Or execution. For someone who has done the same sort of cruel thing that all leaders have always done. .

 

 

 

 

 

Richard N. Haass Agrees with Me


that the Obama Administration has it backwards when it claims that it must stabilize Afghanistan in order to stabilize Pakistan:
The United States is doing a great deal in Afghanistan -- and is considering doing more -- because it sees the effort as essential to protecting Pakistan. But this logic is somewhat bizarre. Certainly, allowing the Taliban and al-Qaeda to reestablish a sanctuary in Afghanistan would make it harder to defeat them in Pakistan. But the Taliban and al-Qaeda already have a sanctuary -- in Pakistan itself.
And further:
It is the government of Pakistan that is tolerating the very groups that the United States is fighting in Afghanistan in the name of Pakistan's stability. It is worth noting, too, that Pakistani officials are not asking the United States to commit additional troops to Afghanistan, in large part because many Pakistanis view Afghanistan as one of several fronts in their struggle against India and see the Taliban as foot soldiers in that contest. Pakistan's future will be determined far more by its willingness and ability to meet internal challenges than by anything that emanates from across its border.

Read more »

Apologize Mr. President!


Here is how I think it should go...

President Obama:  "I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for being selected as a Nobel Laureate.  I take full responsibility for this horrendous mistake.  At first...admittedly....I wanted to place some blame on the Republicans for the last 8 years of governing and foreign policy. (using those terms liberally..no pun intended)  BUT I can not make excuses....it is my fault.  Often have I felt ashamed for the hope I inspire in others, the cogent speeches I make, and the common sense I use.  It is deplorable.  Many have rightly criticized me for my lack of accomplishments in my first few minutes in office.  When I think of all of the brush I could have cleared off of ranches throughout this great country and all of the vacations I could have taken...I am racked with guilt."

"My fellow Americans...I vow to redouble my efforts to lower America's esteem throughout the world.  I will not rest until every country on earth is lined up against us with hatred toward this great land.  It won't be easy, but I owe it the American people.  I will reach across the aisle in a bipartisen effort to...not just lose the Olympics for one city...but find a way to prevent the Olympics from ever being hosted by the United States again.  Only then will I feel as if I have been able to atone for the travesty of being selected for the Nobel Peace Award.  On a side note...my sincere thanks for cable news for pointing out the I have done too much and too little since my election as president.  The relentless push polling and incoherent opposing view points have really helped me develop public policy and have clearly told the American people the whole story.....and then some.  God Bless the media and God Bless America...(unless that blessing causes America to be more popular in other countries)"

This should fix everything! On a side note...someone shoot me.

Hi


Hi im jessica and am new here! i am liberal in my views but come from an ultra conservative family and some of those vaules have rubbed off on me, leaving me with both liberal and conservative ideals!

I hope to get to know everyone and share views

Bottle Tops


<p>You Have to Check out the video</p>

Click on the <a href="http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2054719">Bottle Tops</a> Video Page

Big Medicine's Big Bribe for Michelle Obama


Two months after Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator, the University of Chicago Hospitals suddenly discovered that Michelle Obama was worth way more money than they had been paying her, and increased her compensation from $121,910 in 2004 to $316,962.

That's a $195,052 raise.

Barack Obama became a Senator in January, 2005.

Michelle Obama got a $195,052 raise in March, 2005.

What a weird coincidence!

You might say that's old news, and it was almost no news at all. Nobody cared!

Nobody cares now.

But old news doesn't necessarily become irrelevant on a fixed schedule, and now Barack and Michelle are very unenthusiastic about single-payer healthcare, which would save almost all of us a lot of money, except for a few very well-compensated individuals at the University of Chicago Hospitals and elsewhere in the healthcare industry, like...

Kenneth P. Kates, Chief Operating Officer at the University of Chicago Hospitals, whose salary was $1,304,222 in 2008....

...plus another $267,792 in deferred compensation and other goodies.

Photobucket

That's a very grand total of $1,572,014 for Kenneth P. Kates, who was Chief Operating Officer at the University of Chicago Hospitals in March 2005, when they suddenly discovered that Michelle Obama was much, much more valuable to them than ever before, only two months after her husband was elected to the United States Senate.

And now Barack and Michelle are very unenthusiastic about single-payer healthcare, which would save almost all of us a lot of money, except for a few exceptionally well-compensated individuals like Kenneth P. Kates, whose chances of making $1,572,014 as a federal employee would be zero.

But a public option won't hurt Ken Kates, and Barack and Michelle are a little more enthusiastic about a public option than single-payer, especially if that public option is part of a package which locks us all into the system where Kenneth P. Kates makes $1,572,014.

Listening


Let it be.  It's done.  President Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize.

I congratulate him and am proud of all of us.

Just stop the fighting, people, just stop it now.  What's the point?  To prove your opinion is better than theirs?  Absurd.

I might be simplistic; I am perhaps childish, at best.  I believe that honors should be endowed to those that are humbled by them.  I believe that recipients of prizes should be grateful.  And I believe that those who awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama knew he would be both.  Even more ... that , just maybe, he would take it to mean what it does.  What is that?  Don't you know?

Volumes of words have been written since the notification, and I have no desire to repeat them in depth or otherwise.  They obviously speak for themselves.  It really doesn't matter if we wind ourselves up in a ball or fight to release ourselves from the fiber - we are still Americans.  Or am I dreaming again?

So let's remember what matters.  Let's remember what our country means.  Let's get past the stun-moment of the day and contemplate the importance of tomorrow.  It just might make a difference, and it just might make the United States, and it's President, worthy in the eyes of those who still don't quite see the possibility.

But it's really nice that most do.  It's really amazing that we're back, that we're better.  And by "we" I mean all of us, every single one.  We're not all the way there, we're not even echoing our promises.  Still hollow at best are we, still shouting from the rooftops.  With no one to listen. 

Ahhh ... take a breath. 

Imagine that.  We're finally listening.

So are ....

  

 

       

 

 

 

GOP 'Patriots' Strike America Once Again


BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

GOP 'Patriots' Strike America Once Again

My computer is still warm from my last article where I pointed out that the GOP is no longer conservative, and has become anti-American. Now, reinforcing my position, they've struck out against America again. In last week's column, "Limbaugh-Beck and the GOP Patriots Against America", I pointed out that you can say what you will about true conservatives, but they are fiercely patriotic, and will ALWAYS, support America, regardless to what the circumstances.

But this current group of renegade Republicans are clearly demonstrating not only that they're not true conservatives, but they're not even loyal Americans. With every day that passes it becomes increasingly clear that their only concern is making money, regaining power, and accommodating their own self-interest, and they're more than willing to throw America under the bus to achieve those goals.

Evidence of that fact is they've left no stone unturned to protect the insurance industry, deny Americans affordable health care, and literally celebrated America's loss of the 2016 Summer Olympics. Now, as though to reinforce my thesis, these so-called patriots have struck again by attacking President Obama being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Regardless to your politics, just take a moment to ask yourself, considering America's low ebb in world opinion over the past eight years, would any true conservatives, regardless to their domestic grievances, criticize the Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to the President of the United States? Absolutely not.

To have such an honor come to these shores should be a cause of celebration for every American in the country, since even the biggest fool in America should recognize that this honor gives our president the added international cachet to successfully pursue American foreign policy abroad. But in spite of that, upon receiving news of this honor coming to America, the Republican National Committee issued the following statement:

"The real question Americans are asking is, 'What has President Obama actually accomplished?' It is unfortunate that the president's star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights. One thing is certain - President Obama won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action."

The question that the world must be asking is, 'What kind of idiots are we dealing with here in the United States that would be actively working against their own government?' Secondly, the GOP seems to be completely oblivious to the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize is not limited to simply what has taken place since the inauguration, but what the rise of Barack Obama represents overall. After all, What other world leader in history has done more to inspire the hoped of people all over the world than Barack Obama, and in such a short period of time? This man is, literally, perceived as the walking, breathing personification of hope for people all over the world. So to have given the Nobel Peace Prize to anyone else would have been remiss.

In addition, by indicating in the formal GOP statement that "President Obama won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action", they're betraying the fact that they think the American people are stupid. One would think that the GOP wouldn't even want to mention these issues, since it is only because of Republican malfeasance in office, their fiscal irresponsibility, and failure to adhere to their 'small government' rhetoric for the past eight years that has caused Americans to be without jobs in the first place.

But the American people have come to ignore such nonsense from the Republican Party, because they recognize that due to a clumsy Republican attempt to manipulate public opinion, most GOP missives of this sort comes from Michael Steele, the closest thing to a love child between Michele Bachman and Snoop Dog (Sorry about that Snoop).

The fact is, I challenge anyone reading this article to give me the name of any other person alive who could have rejuvenated America's stature in the world more effectively than Barack Obama. I also challenge anyone to give me the name of any person alive who could have brought more hope to the people of the world than Barack Obama. This man could have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize upon inauguration, and it would have been perfectly justified.

I only wish the president hadn't chosen to apologize for receiving this award., because there's absolutely no doubt that he's exactly the kind of man that Alfred Nobel had in mind when he created it. Thus, it wasn't awarded based on stats - it was an award that came directly from the heart of the people, as it should always be.

So President Obama had absolutely nothing to apologize about. He not only deserves this honor, but he's elevated the stature of all those who preceded him.

The Republican Party claims that he only received this honor because of his superstar status. But as with most things, they have it completely backwards. President Obama didn't receive the award because he's a star, he's a star because he has the very qualities in a world leader that deserves to be honored.

Even so early in his presidency, our forefathers are smiling down upon this man with pride, and even as I write, I can hear Thomas Jefferson saying, "Scoot over Abe, we've got company."

So wake up, America, before it's too late. The GOP deals exclusively in hatred, fear, and war. Torture, death and descension is their forte, because there's no money to be made in peace.

Congratulations, Mr. President. Alfred Nobel has never been done so proud.

 

 

  Eric L. Wattree

wattree.blogspot.com  

Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

To Whom Should Obama Donate The Nobel Cash?


Personally, I'd like Mr. Obama to go the snarky, "f*ck you, GOP!" route and donate the 1.4 million dollars to ACORN -- and to do so in a big public ceremony held right in the middle of the Vegas Pimp 'n Ho Ball.

(Okay, in reality, I'd prefer he donated it to Olbermann's recent cause, the National Association of Free Clinics)

To whom would YOU like to see the money donated and why?  Don't say yourself or your spouse!

No Prize! No Peace!


Er, or do I have that backwards?

As the world isn't at peace, nor ever has been, (excepting Pax Romana--maybe) we should revoke every peace prize ever given.


Prize 4 Prez! (+) Reactionaries playing checkers; Prez playing chess; Committee playing Go


“a stunning surprise” hardly begins to encompass the enormity!… But the back and forth over endeavor vs. success has blinded us to the brilliance of the prize committee’s work…..

Update:(h/t Garrett Utley);

That seismic rumble, barely audible beneath the hubub always provoked when a 25-1 shot comes in, was the shifting of the geopolitical fabric under the forces of reaction.

This is like a game of Go, and the committee has just dropped a stone out there in the ozone that is going to pay dividends for Prez’s true objectives—to finesse the Generals back into their constitutionally mandated subordination, so that the law enfocement prolems of the Pashtuns can be turned over to *law enforcement, and taken out of the free-fire zone.

Prez, and the forces of peace, have five strategically adept allies, as we battle with the war machine.

If nothing else, the McChrystal gambit, as played, will encounter an impediment; just as he packs for Stockholm, (Ed.note: It’s OSLO, you idiot!) Prez will be considering how to respond to that scurvy, mutinous, insubordinate leaker’s request for more cannon fodder.

Next step—the logical imperative for a vigorous world government, and the migration upward of (quaint concept) national sovereignty.

*There are bad people, doing bad things. Someone has to stop them. Just not us vigilante/gangbangers.

A Thought on How Deeds Might Yet Pull Out the Virginia Gov Race


By most of the recent polls, the Democratic nominee for Virginia's next Governor, state senator Creigh Deeds, is trailing in the polls by around 7 points to his Republican challenger, Bob McDonnell.

When I watch the TV ads for McDonnell and Republican Lt. Governor candidate Bollinger, if I did not know which party they were with, I wouldn't be able to tell. The issues they push--reducing class size, raising teacher pay, addressing the northern Virginia transportation mess, and, oh, by the way, cutting taxes (look ma! no hands!) are, with the exception of the latter, *our* issues.

Even if we weren't in a major down economy, with almost all states having to raise taxes, cut services, or both, any candidate promising to increase education and transportation and cut taxes at the same time should not pass the smell test for being someone who could be a credible steward of Virginia's finances over the next few years.

Why isn't the Deeds campaign hammering on this point?

The Washington Post *loves* politicians, at any level of government, who speak the language of fiscal responsibility. If Creigh can get this thing a little closer, he might be able to pick up the Post endorsement late and if it's close that could tip it.

Why not make the case that Deeds alone is the person who as the next governor, will be a good steward of Virginia's finances and that we've heard the cut-taxes-and-increase spending flimflam before, so shame on us if we fall for that impossible math yet again.

I'm not a campaign consultant, but I would think that if they want to go that road they should be able to put together some punchy speeches and good ads for the home stretch.

I just don't know if Deeds at this point has enough time to really develop positive initiatives on education and transportation that he can establish as clearly his to the voters.  Maybe a way to pull this thing out is to make the case that those are fraudulent promises the Republican candidates are making and hope the voters have enough common sense to see that that is the case before they enter the polling places.

I'm definitely not favorable to federal candidates running on a fiscal responsibility theme at this time--that would be terrible economics and politics, both, in my estimation. The voters know the economy is bad--maybe they need someone to prod them into asking the logical question of how any candidate in this environment can promise to increase spending in these two areas and cut taxes at the same time.

My two pennies.  Maybe not in the cards.  But Virginia voters still don't know who Deeds is or what he wants to do.  If he can project himself as a responsible guy who will protect the spending Virginians want protected most...who knows?  I don't think voters in most states, including this one, are expecting miracles these days from their Governors.  Maybe this time they'd rather not be BS'd quite so brazenly as McDonnell is doing, and getting away with.  


Why Does Glenn Beck Hate Grandmothers?


Here's that piece of human-garbage, Beck, verbally abusing former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright just because he doesn't like how old she looks, and how she dresses.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910080008

Perhaps the sight of Madeleine Albright gave Beck a Proustian memory of his repressed hatred for his own mother.

Ironically, Beck's 41-year-old suicidal drug-addict mother died in 1979 in a tragic boating accident on the very same day, May 15th, that Madeleine Albright turned 42. In other words, when Beck looks at Albright he should realize that his own mother, if she had lived, would be the same age, and would look very similar (if she was lucky; IMO drug addicts frequently age very badly and end up looking 10 or 20 years older than they actually are).

He should also realize that (although his own mother never accomplished anything noteworthy enough to get her name in the history books) the women he's spitting on has a PhD in Political Science, honarary doctorates from several universities, was a member of the National Security Council, was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, was U.S. Secretary of State, and is currently among other things a professor at Georgetown University and a author of four books.

If I was Mrs. Glenn Beck #2, I would worry that the revulsion that her husband has towards older women, might be an indication that he's on the verge of pulling a John McCain or Newt Gingrich, and that wife #3 is already in the works.

Clearly, the 46-year-old Glenn Beck is on the verge of a mid-life crisis and might be contemplating dumping his current wife and family, in order to hookup with a hot 25-year-old heiress with a couple of huge trust funds (like 48-year-old McCain did; McCain got a marriage license to marry wife #2 before he'd even finalized his divorce from wife #1).

Or, maybe wife #3 is going to be one of the young interns or staffers Beck's got running around his office and who he probably already spends more time with than with his family (like Gingrich did when he dumped wife #2 in order to promote one of his congressional aides to the position of wife #3).


For all of those who feel that Obama is undeserving of the Nobel Peace Prize


If you don't see the change that Obama has brought to America and the world, then your head is in the sand and to quote "Inherit the Wind": "Perhaps it is you who have moved away -- by standing still."

From The New Zealand Herald : "
He may see no alternative to fighting the war against al Qaeda in Afghanistan but everywhere else he has reasserted the importance of the United Nations and of multilateral diplomacy. He replaced military threats with dialogue with Iran and North Korea. He has begun talks with Russia over nuclear disarmament.

He has prioritised peace in the Middle East. He has reached out a hand of friendship to the Muslim world. He has thrown Washington's recalcitrant attitude to global warming into reverse. All change begins with a change of mind by one individual and Obama has been that person.

The prize may make life difficult for him domestically, giving his right-wing critics another stick with which to beat him over healthcare.

But to the rest of the world the US President is an inspiration. The Audacity of Hope, he called one of his books. Rarely has a single individual in recent times given so much of the world cause to dare to anticipate that a better world can yet be made."

When your power meters reveals more information about you than the town gossip


So...what happens if the utility companies hire Xe (formerly known as Blackwater) or other right wing-owned, professional para-military mercs to design and oversee security for information management and data security?  I'd want my local community to have input and a voting status in all manner of operations -- like members of rural electric cooperatives .  Who owns your personal data?  Who is to oversee how this data is to be used?  Who can view it?   How does your data fit within the corporate vision/mission? Is your data now part of legalized databases  actually newly authorized corporate revenue streams sold to the public as 'market innovation?' 


In the case of an emergency - or actually on any given day - do you want the decision about who controls your most personal information made by some CEO and a board of directors whose prime directive is to make a lot of money so they can buy members of Congress to approve 'free pass' legislation and access to the US Treasury.  Hell we Georgians will soon be paying Georgia Power for the construction of two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle that will not be producing electricity for many years to come, if ever.  By law, Georgia Power can up your rates at anytime to pay for over-costs and your bill will not be going down until construction is complete.  Georgia Power receives no punishment is construction is delayed by years or never completed.  Vogtle Units 1 and 2 were initially projected to cost $330 million but had a final price tag of nearly $9 billion.  Amanda

What will talking power meters say about you?

Posted: Friday, October 9 2009 at 05:00 am CT by Bob Sullivan

Would you sign up for a discount with your power company in exchange for surrendering control of your thermostat?  What if it means that, one day, your auto insurance company will know that you regularly arrive home on weekends at 2:15 a.m., just after the bars close?

Welcome to the complex world of the Smart Grid, which may very well pit environmental concerns against thorny privacy issues.  If you think such debates are purely philosophical, you're behind the times.

Maryland residents this month received fliers offering annual discounts of up to $100 in exchange for allowing their power company, Pepco, to occasionally shut off their air conditioning units during hot days, when demand is high. Pepco says consumers will hardly notice the change, and the two-way communication between utility and appliances will go a long way toward preventing brownouts.

Pepco's discount plan is among the first signs that the futuristic "Smart Grid" has already arrived. Up to three-fourths of the homes in the United States are expected to be placed on the "Smart Grid" in the next decade, collecting and storing data on the habits of their residents by the petabyte.   And while there's no reason to believe Pepco or other utilities will share the data with outside firms, some experts are already asking the question: Will saving the planet mean inviting Big Brother into the home? Or at least, as Commerce Secretary Gary Locke recently warned, will privacy concerns be the "Achilles' heel" of the Smart Grid?...

Rest of article here: 

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/10/would-you-sign-up-for-a-discount-with-your-power-company-in-exchange-for-surrendering-control-of-your-thermostat-what-if-it.html#posts

Top liberal blogger: Upon learning of Peace Prize to Obama, I thougth I was reading a "bizarre Onion gag"


Today in his daily column, Civil Libertarian blogger Glenn Greenwald gives props to Obama for changing the tone: His speech in Cairo, his willingness to talk to Iran, pressure to Israel to stop settlements, his moves to close Guantanamo, etc.

On balance, however, Greenwald sees lack of accomplishments, and little progress in the Muslim world, contrary to the assertions of the Nobel Committee. This award, he says, was "painfully ludicrous."

Excerpt:

When I saw this morning's top New York Times headline -- "Barack Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize" -- I had the same immediate reaction which I'm certain many others had: this was some kind of bizarre Onion gag that got accidentally transposed onto the wrong website, that it was just some sort of strange joke someone was playing. Upon further reflection, that isn't all that far from the reaction I still have.

Excerpt:

GREENWALD (10-9-09): Beyond Afghanistan, Obama continues to preside over another war -- in Iraq: remember that? -- where no meaningful withdrawal has occurred. He uttered not a peep of opposition to the Israeli massacre of Gazan civilians at the beginning of this year (using American weapons), one which a U.N. investigator just found constituted war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. The changed tone to Iran notwithstanding, his administration frequently emphasizes that it is preserving the option to bomb that country, too -- which could be a third war against a Muslim country fought simultaneously under his watch. He's worked tirelessly to protect his country not only from accountability -- but also transparency -- for the last eight years of war crimes, almost certainly violating America's treaty obligations in the process. And he is currently presiding over an expansion of the legal black hole at Bagram while aggressively demanding the right to abduct people from around the world, ship them there, and then imprison them indefinitely with no rights of any kind.[/div]

Excerpt:

As Der Spiegel put it in the wake of a worldwide survey in July: "while Europe's ardor for Obama appears fervent, he has actually made little progress in the regions where the US faces its biggest foreign policy problems." People who live in regions that have long been devastated by American weaponry don't have the luxury of being dazzled by pretty words and speeches."

"That's what makes this Prize so painfully and self-evidently ludicrous," he added.

Sniper fire at Brazilian Embassy: Radio Globo


Radio Globo, which now broadcasts on the Internet from a clandestine location in Honduras, recently announced that snipers are firing into the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, where President Zelaya and members of his government and supporters have taken refuge.  No reports of injuries have been made at this time.

Photos of one of the sniper platforms was taken early this morning and sent to Adrienne Pine at Quotha.

If this story pans out, what will Brazil's reaction be?

Another Fried Day Night


And Dickday and I are talking baseball and Nobel Peace Prizes, and love and war, and stuff.

Join us with your TPM user name and celebrate a good Friday!


Obama Wins Life Time Achievement Award


President Obama has recieved a lifetime achievement award for the many accomplishments he's likely to make over a long career in public office. After being awarded the Noble prize for capturing, "the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the committee said, "We felt it was time to reward him for the realization of that hope and that better future he's sure to create over his lifetime."

Appearing in the Rose Garden, Mr. Obama said he was ''surprised and deeply humbled" by the committee's decision.  "To be honest," the president said "I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who have been honored by this prize, men and women who've had to live to an old age and who actually accomplished the things they are honored for before getting the award."He said he would accept it as a, "self fulfilling prophecy."

Afghanistan - a riddle wrapped in an emigma


A suicide car bomb killing at least 12 people was intended for the Indian embassy in Kabul, according to the New York Times (10/8/09).  The previous day the same paper published an analysis by Peter Baker and Eric Schmitt that says the Afghan war debate now leans to a focus on a campaign against Al Qaeda in Pakistan.  It is not known whether this view is accepted by the Obama war cabinet.

The central question hinges on the nature of the current relationship between the Taliban and Al Queda.  Therein is the question.  The predictability of the future of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan has to be settled by the President.   Recent successes with surgical strikes against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan may make it less central to U.S. strategy.  The administration pointed out to the Times in an anonymous interview that there are fewer than 100 Al Qaeda fighters left in Afghanistan.  Another anonymous official characterizes the strategy as one of viewing the Taliban, militants local to Afghanistan and jihadist Al Qaeda as very different.  President Obama has reiterated that his goal is to protect the United States and to prevent the jihadists from getting safe haven.  Mark Knoller reported on Twitter that "a WH official says Obama received a 'comprehensive intelligence and counterterrorism assessment' on political & diplomatic situation in Pakistan."

President Obama requested an early look at General McChrystal's troop request from Defense Secretary Gates, according to McClatchy Wednesday.  The President wanted to see it before the top military officials reviewed it so that it would not be leaked to reporters as was McChrystal's Afghanistan assessment. This may suggest friction between the military and the commander in chief.  And there has certainly been friction between General McChrystal and his superiors because of his public stances, and because of the leak. 

Similarly Pakistan's army has objected publicly to the conditions in the $1.5 billion U.S. (Kerry-Lugar) aid package still to be signed by the President, McClatchy reported.  This pits the military "against the fragile civilian government of the Pakistan Peoples Party, which has championed the U.S. assistance deal," as well as the opposition in parliament.  The bill has a number of requirements including, "monitoring and certification of Pakistan's action against terrorism. . . requires the country to work to prevent nuclear proliferation and to show that its military isn't interfering in Pakistani politics."  This objection, according to McClatchy caught the administration by surprise and comes at a time just prior to a planned offensive towards militants in the border region of Waziristan.  Pakistan's Foreign minister on a trip to Washington played down concerns over the bill, while acknowledging that the language could have been more sensitive to Pakistan's sovereignty.  Marc Ambinder posted this on Twitter:"RT @nickschifrin: Is the Pakistani military statement of doubt about the Kerry-Lugar bill in #Pakistan a game changer?" It was linked to a related BBC News story explaining more about the nature of the Pakistani military's objections.

Finally, many of us remember Charlie Wilson's War.  Huffingington Post reports that Wilson now thinks that we ought to consider a new strategy regarding the war in Afghanistan.  "I'd probably shut it down, rather than lose a lot of soldiers and treasure," noting the President's "very tough situation."  See the Scranton Times-Tribune

References:
"Gross: Massive Fraud in Afghanistan Election," is by Nasrine Gross at Juan Cole's Informed Comment (10/7/09).
"Robert Kaplan on the Regional Dimensions of Afghanistan," is from Steve Clemons' The Washington Note (10/7/09).
"Guest Post by Michael Cohen: The Trouble with Counter-Insurgency," is from Steve Clemons' The Washington Note (4/1/09).
"Battle of Books rages in Afghan debate," is from The Wall Street Journal at  Memeorandum (10/7/09).  Regards Lessons in Disaster and A Better War.
" 'Code Pink' rethinks its call for Afghanistan pullout," is from the Christian Science Monitor at  Memeorandum (10/7/09).

Bill Moyers on Banking (updated)


This is pretty much a duplicate of a post by Arianna Huffington highlighting tonight's topic on Bill Moyers' show - big banks and how they are screwing us all. The whole issue makes me both mad and heartsick. Here's Arianna's lead in:

When I spoke to Bill yesterday he described it as "a moment of truth-telling that could ignite the public's passion for Wall Street reforms that have been strangled in the crib by the big banks and their bought-and-paid-for politicians."

To be honest, I'm skeptical that it will ignite anything. People are too busy celebrating or decrying Obama's selection for a largely meaningless prize from some hoary organization. And even if that were not the case, I'm sure Michelle Bachmann has said something stupid or Glen Beck has gone off the rails again, or some other such important distraction has occurred.

At any rate, here are the two preview clips PBS has released.


(link)


(link)


The show will air tonight. Do watch it if you get the chance.

Update: If you only watch one clip ... watch this one. I gets right to the heart of why the system is all screwed up and some ideas on how to fix it.

(link)


GOP: Go in Peace!!!


{Note: This was a comment on a post by OverreachThis, but I thought it was worth sharing since on the West Coast I come so late to these parties.  http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mare_nostrum/2009/10/barack-obama-has-won-the-nobel.php#comment-3628807}

 

Maybe we should just leave the Republicans out of this. I mean, it is not due to any action of the GOP that Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize today, but solely due to his efforts to turn away from the path the GOP had taken. They are not on this path. They do not wish to be on this path, and yet we bring up their name. This is not about them. This is about our country, our President, the country and President they would deny. To hear their name is to pollute the air of peace that has developed. It disturbs the peace if you will. Let there be peace. The GOP has no intention, stated or implied, to bring about peace. Fine, they may remain in whatever misery they wish. Bringing them to this celebration only makes them more upset. So let's not. They have no intention of making this a Grand Old Party anyway.

Killing civilians is not warfare, it is TERRORISM!


Goldstone has brought us nearer to the truth to ensure that international action is taken to prohibit  war crimes in the future.

Killing and injuring civilians is not warfare, it is TERRORISM, and that must be stamped out at the very least by those states that claim to be liberal democracies.

Any such claimed democracy that uses terrorism must be debarred from trading with the EU, and hopefully with the US.

In Europe, we can only ensure that the EU has no truck with terrorism. CIVILIAN LIFE MUST BE HELD SACROSANCT for otherwise there is NO DEMOCRACY!

Posted by bluecanary 

NY Times Pries Prez Prize Surprise


Only a cynical Beltway insider like the Times' Sheryl Gay Stolberg could construe Obama's winning of the NPP as a "potential political liability" .

She is apparently basing this speculative assertion on the fact that "...Republicans are criticizing the president, contending he won more for his "star power" than his actual achievements."

Gee, I always thought a political liability was something that caused a decline in a politician's popularity, i.e. a loss of support.

Since those "criticizing the president"(rather than the Nobel Committee?) are unlikely to EVER be supporters of the president on ANYTHING, how is this a potential liability?

This is just another pre-emptive wimp-out by a member of the MSM to avoid the stupid 'liberal media' label by mainstreaming wingnut bullshit.

Update; A Google search of "Obama Nobel Prize liability" reveals that Stolberg is the only one cynical enough to assert this.

The Public Option Option Option


So, perhaps you've heard the buzz about a shiny, new compromise compromise in the battle for healthcare reform reform.  First, there was the notion of single-payer.  Of course, this proved to be far too unpalatable for anyone to the right of Dennis Kucinich, so then we were given the notion of the public option.  This would create a Medicare-style system for anyone who wanted to buy in.  It was certainly a compromise, but the merits of the compromise, as well as the general notion, were clear - it's publicly run and anyone can opt in.  Public.  Option.

Of course, then came the deluge of counter-offers and distortions.  It quickly became the "government option" or "government takeover of healthcare" or "Barack Obama wants to kill your grandmother by way of ripping your children to shreds and force-feeding her to death with the pieces like the Sloth guy in Se7en."  Oh, and the further compromises.  For some, the public option was still not enough of a compromise, so it needed to be sliced up into 50 parts or converted into regional co-ops or hooked up to triggers.

Read more »

A Clio Award for Bush


Clio Award
Clio Awards

Okie dokie then....Our President receives a Nobel Peace Prize without any lobbying effort on his part and even appears a little embarrassed in his short speech acknowledging that he will accept it.  Only 9 months in office and he receives the Nobel Peace Prize.


Read more »

Why Obama Won the Nobel, Part I


So, have you heard about President Obama winning the Nobel Prize? If you'd suggested this to me yesterday, I wouldn't have believed it, let alone been able to put forth an argument for it, so I won't pretend it made intuitive sense when I woke up this morning.

I do think this prize makes more sense when you think about the nature of the Nobels for Peace, and for Literature, and understand how they work. If you think of the Nobels, or similar prizes, as straightforward and objective rewards for merit, then it seems obvious that Obama should continue paying his dues, and maybe the Middle East's dues, before it's his turn.

Of course, the Peace Prize, unlike the other Nobels, has never been about completed labors. It's not a gold watch for a retiree. They didn't wait for global warming to end to give the Prize to Gore. They didn't wait for Poland to free itself from Communism to give the Prize to Lech Walesa, who won in 1983. This is the twentieth anniversary of the 14th Dalai Lama winning the Prize; his homeland remains under Chinese rule. And the 1991 winner, Aung San Suu Kyi, is still under house arrest. The prize has always been for the struggles the recipient undertakes rather than the struggles they win. A prize that's about ending war forever has never been solely about results.

But the larger problem is that no award like the Nobel Peace Prize is or ever could be an objective recognition of merit. There is no way to assess the question objectively. (The Prize for Literature, like all arts prizes, faces the same question.) The Nobel Prize is not a box score. It is an action, taken by the committee.

That action does two things: it attempts to build up the prestige of the Prize itself, and it lends the Prize's accumulated prestige to the winners, as additional leverage in their struggles.

The first is less obvious, so I'll deal with it first, and save the second for another post. The Prize always seems to be a straightforward consecration of the winner by the Prize committee. But the Nobel, like any other prize, is only as prestigious as the list of previous winners make it. Sure, the Prize comes with 1.4 million dollars, and that's not hay. But if a bunch of rich donors started giving out a 3 million dollar prize ever year, and always ended up giving it to obscure state legislators with crank theories, the prize would never matter to anyone. The Nobel Peace Prize matters because Albert Schweitzer and Martin Luther King and Theodore Roosevelt and George C. Marshall won it. Has it gone to the occasional dud? Sure. It's impossible to get it right every time. But part of the Prize Committee's business is choosing recipients who will sustain and increase the prize's luster. In the long run, it's Dr. King and President Roosevelt and the Dalai Lama who make the prize big, more than it's the other way around.

(This, very clearly, is how the Prize for Literature works. Even if it's been given to a few second-raters over the years, the fact that it's gone to Yeats and Faulkner and Garcia Marquez makes it virtually impossible to refuse. And understanding the prize decisions are based on the attempt to promote the Prize's own future prestige makes those decisions easier to understand.)

The Prize Committee didn't just give Obama something. They also attempted to attach themselves to him, to make his stature and charisma part of the Prize going forward. (Ask not what the Nobel can do for you ....) It's an investment decision, although the investment is in symbolic capital. The committee invested the Prize's authority in President Obama, speculating that over time his historical profile would make that authority grow.

Giving the sixth Peace Prize to Theodore Roosevelt was probably one of the smartest investments the Peace Prize Committee ever made, associating the prize with a charismatic international statesman and a rising world power. The previous winners had been pacifists and international activists: worthy people, but with nothing like Roosevelt's clout or stature. Giving Roosevelt the Prize changed its nature, and increased its influence.

The Prize Committee's decision can be understood as a sign that it wants to grab onto Obama's coattails, and more importantly to associate itself with the United States and its international power, just as the 1906 Prize Committee did. Clearly, the committee does not imagine the United States as a power in decline. Rather, they seem excited about America returning to a position of world leadership. Obama gets the prize, I suspect, for coming back to the world table as Chairman of the Board, a position that Bush abdicated.

American leadership, American international diplomacy, American power is in again, and the Nobel Peace Prize Committee wants to buy in early. I think that's the best news I, as an American, can have.

More thoughts in the next post.

Cross-posted at http://dagblog.com

THE WORLD MOONSTRUCK - GIVES NOBEL PEACE PRIZE - BUT GREAT EXPECTATIONS REMAIN


THE WORLD, MOONSTRUCK - GIVES NOBEL PEACE PRICE - BUT GREAT    EXPECTATIONS REMAIN 

                                                     By

                                              Joseph Chez 

Today, October 9, 2009, the world woke up surprised to hear that President Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, had been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.  In a day of historical markers, scientist struck the moon in hopes of finding a substance that would give hopes for human exploration of the heavens, but their findings are yet to be examined for desirable findings.  Likewise, the world is yet not all convinced that President Obama merits the coveted international Nobel Peace Prize Award. 

In response to his Nobel Peace Prize selection, President Obama stated his appreciation but said, "I am both surprised and deeply humbled ... I do not view it as recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather, as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people of all nations." And he went on to say that he honestly did not believe he deserved to be in the company of predecessors receiving such award.  He thus accepted the award as a call to action to change the status quo, but regrettably, he also stated that the United States needed to confront a ruthless adversary who threatened the United States and our allies.  

World reaction was quick and skeptical.  The Moslem world has reacted with criticism of the continued US confrontation in their part of the world.  Europeans, who also joined us in celebration of his inauguration as President, have also shown displeasure at President Obama's seemingly about face in not immediately bringing peace.  In the US, his critics across the political isle laughed and ridiculed this event.  But that is to be expected, as lately, his political adversaries have mocked all his efforts to help the economy, provide health care for all Americans, or bring the two wars in the Middle East to a desirable conclusion.   

I, a staunch supporter and activist of the once presidential candidate, also feel uneasy about this award.  I concur with the President's assertion that he does not deserve to be in the same category of Nobel Peace Prize recipients - at least not yet.  For although I truly believe that citizen Barack Obama is a peaceful person and one who has great aspirations for peace, as President now, he has caved in to politics and not followed principle. 

It is true that the state of affairs in our country and US foreign policy abroad is a daunting task.  Changing minds and entrenched US Government policy can not be changed over night.  However, it appears to me, as well as to millions in this country and around the world, that our President is compromising his core principles for the sake of pragmatic politics.  In fact, President Obama was overwhelmingly elected with a mandate to end the war, in both Iraq and in Afghanistan.  And yet, there is continued talk of continuing the war until an eventual victory.  In his meeting today with his national security advisors and with pentagon commanders, plans are being drawn for troop increases. 

So just like the skeptical world, I would like for President Obama to assert his leadership as Commander in Chief and decide for himself, that what is best for the country and for the world, is for an immediate cessation of the war.  Trying to appease the political opposition is simply counter productive and a betrayal of one's convictions. 

Yes Mr. President, we can close Guantanamo with a simple presidential edict; we can call an end to our retribution against our 9-11 enemies; yes, we can force Israel to accept an independent Palestinian State; and through diplomatic means, we can even persuade Iran and North Korea to give up pursuit of nuclear weapons.  So Mr. President, peace has to be earned - but not through compromising efforts for peace or continuing your predecessor ways.  Quoting an unlikely character, Richard M. Nixon, at his inaugural address, he stated: "The greatest honor history can bestow is the title of peacemaker."

"This honor now beckons America..."   Thus, the nation and the world wait for your affirmation and deeds for peace. We congratulate you nonetheless, but we reserve our great expectations.

 

 

 

Oh NOW, they want results.


President Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Suddenly the party of smugly and righteously hurting the evildoers' feelings has rediscovered the importance of results and achievements. Stay classy, neocons.

Wanna Cut Health Care Costs? Outlaw Drug Ads!


NasonexYou can't turn on the TV anymore without seeing commercials telling you to ask your doctor about drugs that will make you pee less, shrink your prostate, lower your cholesterol, cheer you out of your depression and give you a raging erection.  We see commercials for pills that will cut acid reflux, keep you from getting pregnant, treat that under-the-toenail fungus, help you sleep and clear out your snotty nose.

These commercials are... to a one of them... unnecessary.

Read more »

Peace Prize isn't just about Obama's First 2 Weeks in Office


Mike Huckabee says the following:

"There will be an outcry from those on the right who will say that Obama's nomination, made two weeks into his presidency, is impossible to justify, but I think such an outcry will sound like right-wing whining," Huckabee wrote. "The better response is simply to allow those on the left to explain what he did in his first two weeks as President that merited such recognition."

It's not about just the first two weeks of President Obama's administration Mr. Huckabee, the Nobel Peace Prize he won is more than likely about the way he handled his campaign and the way he approached American citizens and their desire for change. 

It was about the way he approached other nations around the world and the way he asked Muslims to join us in the fight against terrorism. 

It was about the way he showed everyone they deserved to be listened to and respected for their ideas.

It's about the way he took on the establishment and proved that anybody could run and become a leader if they worked hard enough for it.

It was about the famous speech he made about race.  That speech is considered as famous as Martin L King's, "I have a Dream" speech.

It was about the way he got people to follow his dream. 

Just look at the pictures and listen to the stories of those he visited across this nation during his campaign.  He made history with all the types of folks of all ages.  He made history with the amount of people that came to see him at his rallies.  Thousands traveled for miles to see Barack Obama in person. 

Go back and at look the pictures and videos that were shown during Obama's campaign in the United States and in places like Germany during his world tour in July of 2008.  Look at the pictures in Germany when he spoke to over 200,000 people wanting to see and hear his opinion about the world's views and our connections.

No Mr. Huckabee, President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize wasn't just about his first two weeks in office.  It was about the way he drove the world to the idea of 'change' in 2008.


Weekly Mulch: Obama's Nobel Prize


By Raquel Brown, Media Consortium Blogger

President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize today for his accomplishments in international diplomacy, climate change and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation. The Nobel Committee praised Obama for his "constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting," but, Richard Kim of The Nation wonders if the award comes too soon, as Obama has not yet committed to attending the international climate summit at Copenhagen.

Read more »

Dem's Working on Relief Efforts to Help Stop Depression Republicans Almost Created


WASHINGTON (AP) - Confronted with big job losses and no sign the U.S. economy is ready to stand on its own (I DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT), Democrats are working on a growing list of relief efforts, leaving for later how to pay for them, or whether even to bother.

Proposals include extending and perhaps expanding a popular tax credit for first-time home buyers, and creating a new credit for companies that add jobs. Taken together, the proposals look a lot like another economic stimulus package, though congressional leaders don't want to call it that.

Democratic leaders in Congress and the White House say they have no appetite for another big spending package that adds to the federal budget deficit, which hit a record $1.4 trillion for the budget year that ended last week.

But with unemployment reaching nearly 10 percent, many lawmakers are feeling pressure to act. Some of the proposals come from the Republicans' playbook and focus on tax cuts, even though they, too, would swell the deficit...

Rep. Dave Camp, D-Mich., the top Republican on the Ways and Means Committee, said: "The fact that they're putting forward all of these things is really an indication that the stimulus was a failure. It didn't work."


Bullwicky!  No Rep. Camp (He's a Republican not a D-Mich as the report says), the stimulus helped to stop us from going into a depression.

What this is a sign of is, the Bush administration and the Republican Party's lack of doing anything to stop the loss of over 2 million jobs during the years of 2007-2008 when the recession began, and their lack of doing anything to stop the economy from tanking in and heading toward the worse recession since the Great Depression.

Imagine where the economy would be today if the Bush administration had taken control of the issue back in 2007 or early 2008.

Instead the Obama administration and the Democratic Party inherited their mess. 

It was because Democrats passed (alone mind you) the stimulus package within one month so that it could begin saving jobs-- that we aren't in a depression.  Instead the economy is starting to improve with a possible growth of 3 percent this quarter instead of being in the negative.

Yes jobs are scarce, they are always the last to come back -- it's just much worse this time because of the previous administration's lack of acting on the growing recession and mess.

The cost of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan is one reason our deficit has climbed.  Imagine where that deficit would be today if not for spending almost a trillion dollars in Iraq?  And now because the Bush administration and the Republican Party ignored the war in Afghanistan, Obama and Democrats must now repair the damage there and finish that war as well as the one in Iraq.

If money is needed to help create more jobs -- so be it.  They broke the economy, now Democrats must fix it.

Nobel Prize - Celebrate It


For those of us who share Obama's international policy goals and diplomatic efforts the prize should be celebrated.  Yes, we should remain humble considering the challenges before us.  But, we should also be encouraged that our efforts thus far are recognized and supported.

How quickly the media gets everyone spinning.  Is this a bad thing for Obama?  Is it too soon?  If you drink too much of their coffee it acts as a depressant.  Have a cup, wake up, and enjoy the day!!!

Why Does Obama Deserve the Nobel? How about Peace with Iran.


Most of the people shocked by today's news that President Obama has been named the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize apparently missed (or didn't fully digest) the news of the major deal the administration just struck with Iran (shipping off their raw uranium to be enriched in Russia under IAEA supervision into medical grade uranium, which is unsuitable for use in weapons manufacturing).

If this deal works out (and there's no reason to think it won't at this point), we'll have achieved the real potential for an island of stability in the region, with Iran no longer posing a major threat to Israel or other Western interests in the region, and with Iran retaining its right to use nuclear technologies (such as nuclear power) for peaceful civilian purposes.

There's been scarcely any coverage at all in the American press about just how important the deal that the administration made with Iran is.

So why the Nobel Peace Prize now?

Because people who make promising peace deals under difficult, politically charged circumstances are exactly the kind of people the Nobel Peace Prize was designed to honor, so I really don't understand what all the skepticism is about.

Oh, yeah. Right, Almost no Americans have even heard about this deal and what it means, because the press has shown barely any interest in discussing it. That probably has something to do with it.

Pour épater le Républicains


Seeing as how the Nobel Committees have marked out one prize a year to basically annoy Republicans -- always a worthy goal -- what's up for 2010?  Climate change is always a winner, maybe a physics prize for someone in that field?  Literature is always a fertile field.

Before he can accept the Nobel prize, will Obama have to prove he was born on Earth?


Every now and then, I get all snarked-up.

Tape Detainee Interrogation Sessions -- WHY


WASHINGTON -- Congress is moving to require videotaping of interrogations of detainees held by the military, a step proponents say will prevent abuse and create a valuable intelligence record.

The provision, which the House passed on Thursday as part of the 2010 Defense Authorization Act conference report, would apply to interrogations of anyone held at a Defense Department facility. Because the Central Intelligence Agency's secret overseas prisons have been closed, it would most likely cover terrorism suspects whether they were questioned by a military or a C.I.A. officer.

The requirement would not apply to battlefield interrogations by troops engaged in combat.

This bill is suppose to "prevent abuse and create a valuable intelligence".  I'd like to know how? 

If the bill Senator Joe Lieberman has put forward is passed, all Congress has to do is turn around and exempt any future videos as well, siting the potential effect/harm on American national security or our troops-- "Americans can't see those videos, they might bring harm to our national security or our troops."

So why bother with this bill demanding that interrogations be video taped -- they will never see the light of day anyway with the likes of folks like Senator Lieberman in Congress.

GOP: It's the Unemployment Rate, Stupid -- I say, Bring It On


That could be the rallying cry for Republicans in elections next year, and possibly in 2012, as they seek to regain power in Congress and the White House.

Despite signs of improvement in the economy, the unemployment rate keeps climbing -- up to a 26-year high of 9.8 percent in September -- potentially providing Republicans political ammunition and putting Democrats on the defensive...

The thing is, even if the stimulus worked, it wouldn't have necessarily created a lot of jobs in the business cycle," said Kevin Hassett, the director of economic studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "So I think the crowing on both sides in not the most defensible."

Hassett pointed out the irony of Democrats being on the defensive about the economy after sweeping to power in Congress in 2006 and capturing the White House in 2008 based mainly on blaming Republicans for the economic woes. Now Democrats have adopted economic policies that were not well designed and will extend the economic misery for the next few years, he said.

Just like in 1994 when they retook Congress, Republicans are describing the economy as the worst since President Herbert Hoover presided over the start of the Great Depression, Hassett noted. The only difference? "This time it's true," Hassett said.

As usual the Republicans have a sudden loss of memory with their so called facts.

Americans know that President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party INHERITED the worse economy since the Great Depression - that's a FACT!

I say to the Republicans, you want a debate about the economy and who took it down the tubes - Bring it on people, bring it on!

Remember back in 2000 when President Clinton left office and handed off to the Republican Party and President George W. Bush a $300 billion surplus?

Just eight years later in 2008 we get the news of how American jobs are hemorrhaging with a total loss of jobs being up to 2.6 million and that we had been in two recessions since President Bush took office.  The first recession in 2000 began that spring according to the economists and the latest one began in 2007.

January 9, 2009 - President Bush was still in charge of economy

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The hemorrhaging of American jobs accelerated at a record pace at the end of 2008, bringing the year's total job losses to 2.6 million or the highest level in more than six decades.

A sobering U.S. Labor Department jobs report Friday showed the economy lost 524,000 jobs in December and 1.9 million in the year's final four months, after the credit crisis began in September.

The unemployment rate rose to 7.2% last month from 6.7% in November - its highest rate since January 1993.

The steep annual drop in jobs marked the highest yearly job-loss total since 1945, the year in which World War II ended...

"We're seeing a complete unraveling of the labor market and are on track for getting beyond 10% unemployment," said Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute.

The total number of unemployed Americans rose by 632,000 to 11.1 million.

It was President-elect Barack Obama that begun a push for a massive stimulus plan, aimed at creating or saving 3 million jobs over the next two years.

It was during the Bush administration, that unemployment jumped a full 2% over his 8 years in office.   It was just 5.1% in December of 2000.  By January of 2009 it was 7.2%.  As the previous story points out, it was predicted that unemployment was on track to go as high as 10% this year - even before President Elect Barack Obama took office.

As for what President Obama promised if his Stimulus package passed; he said it would CREATE or SAVE 3 million jobs.  Note the word 'OR' people?

So Republicans, go ahead and try to make the election 2010 about jobs and the economy.  I'm sure Democrats and President Obama will enjoy pointing out the true facts to the American people - as if they need to be reminded who it was that really put us in the tank.

Conservatives Decry Obama Nobel Peace Prize, Award Alternative "Jesus Prize"


Conservatives reacted with shock and dismay to the Nobel committee's decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama. There are reports that some prominent conservatives exploded like Agent Smith at the end of Matrix. But FOX News commentator Bill O'Reilly reacted with little surprise, telling viewers, "Look, Sweden is a socialist country, so of course they elected one of their own." Rush Limbaugh blamed "reverse discrimination," claiming that, "Qualified white candidates have been passed over once again for a black man who doesn't deserve a peace prize." Limbaugh also complained that liberals were "playing the race card again." Glenn Beck wept aloud on his radio show and cried, "Run for your lives, America, the fascho-communist revolution is at hand!"

Other conservatives, led by billionaire Rupert Murdoch, hastily arranged an alternative set of prizes to combat perceived bias by the Nobel Committee. According to FOX News president Roger Ailes, the new prizes are called "Jesus Prizes" because "everyone looks up to Jesus." The Jesus committee has already selected winners for the 2009 prizes in the following categories:

Read more »

Barack Obama Wins World Series


In a game that will be talked about for years, President Barack Obama pitched and hit his way to a 3-0 victory in a winner-take-all match-up against a squad of all-stars selected from the eight 2009 American and National leagues' playoff teams.  The President was allowed only one other player in the field, and he selected Detroit Tigers' catcher Gerald Laird as a battery mate (the Tigers missed their division's title, losing a one-game playoff to the Minnesota Twins.).

 

As the only batter in his team's lineup, Obama was forced to try to hit a home run in every at bat and swing at almost every pitch to avoid being stranded on base.  His hitting performance reflected this, with Obama getting only four hits in 31 at-bats, with no walks.  His hits consisted of three homers and a double when he was thrown out sliding into third.  "He didn't get a lot of hits but he made them count," said opposing squad manager, New York Yankees skipper Joe Girardi. 

 

On the mound, Obama threw 142 pitches over nine shutout innings, scattering six hits and two walks with one wild pitch.  Obama's shutout was in jeopardy when, up 3-0 in the bottom of the ninth, Albert Pujols of the St. Louis Cardinals hit a shot into the left field corner.  Retrieving the ball quickly, Obama chased Pujols down the third-base line, tagging him moments before he crossed the plate.  Asked if he felt Obama should have thrown him the ball for the tag, catcher Laird demurred, saying, "Pujols could have started a big rally, and in that situation you want your best player making the play."

 

As this year's World Series winner, Obama will next visit the White House where he will meet himself.  Asked if he will say anything to himself about national and world affairs, Obama said he didn't want to turn the event into "some kind of political spectacle - let's keep this about baseball."

Olbermann Donates $50K to Free Clinics, Will You Donate Too?


Following up on his one hour Special Comment on Wednesday evening, Keith Olbermann announced on Thursday's edition of Countdown that he will donate $50,000.00 of his own money to the National Association of Free Clinics.  An impressive examply of putting one's money where one's mouth is.  Hats off once again to Keith Olbermann for his leadership!

The donation is so the National Association of Free Clinics can put the funds toward conducting free clinics in the states of the six Democrats who have not committed toward voting for cloture to prevent a Republican led filibuster of Healthcare Reform Legislation. 

The Shameful Six are:

Nelson of Nebraska

Lincoln and Pryor of Arkansas

Baucus of Montana

Landrieu of Louisiana

Reid of Nevada

Wednesday's special comment was a very compelling and well done piece... one of Olbermann's best efforts to date.  His generous donation goes a long way toward making the free clinics a reality in those five states.  But these things are obviously expensive and even with a big donation of this kind more money is going to be needed to pull these clinics off.  If all of us who support doing this each donated something toward the effort I feel confident it would raise a considerable amount of cash and perhaps even raise enough money to pay for one or more of these free clinics to be held in one of the states of the shameful six Democrats.

If Olbermann is putting up $50K then it ought to be possible for most, if not all, of those of us who agree with Olbermann's goal of having these clinics in the five aforementioned states to make some kind of contribution as well. 

I am going to donate online and you can too. 

I urge you to do so even if it is just a few bucks.  Everything adds up.  Just go to the National Association of Free Clinics and make your donation now.  I think this is an effective contribution to the fight and one that also helps those in need.  How can ya beat that huh?

Here's a link to the National Assoc. of Free Clinics website:

https://npo.networkforgood.org/Donate/Donate.aspx?npoSubscriptionId=1000863&code=NAFC2009

And, if you haven't seen Olbermann's extraordinary Special Comment from Wednesday night you can do so by going to the Countdown website by clicking here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677

 

"Sadly Ironic"


Like health care, the debate over gun laws (I prefer that term to the "loaded" "gun control") in this country is rarely, if ever, rational.

For example, I have never had a pro-gun (for lack of a better term) person explain away why New York is now the safest large city, with gun violence down to 1960's levels.

Our strong gun laws (mostly put in place by right-wing darling Rudy Giuliani) are a major deterrent to both gun violence and robbery (by way of stiff mandatory sentences) and illegal gun sales (by way of tracking weapons and out-of-state gun shops); and have created a climate that (and yes, it includes other things) makes New York safer than any other large city in the US.

My friend Todd (I don't think he'd mind being described as a gun nut, LOL) said "well, that's just New York" ... I'm still wondering what he meant.

Now consider this.

Is it REALLY surprising when gun advocates (and even regular folks with guns) start shooting them? Statistically you are FAR more likely to shoot someone you know than the always-cited hypothetical intruder or mugger. In most cases that turns out to be a family member.


Happier times (at least for her)


We don't know the details here yet. But is it really "ironic"?

Another overlooked fact in the debate is that the number ONE cause of gun-related death and injury is suicide. Again, the logic that is lost on gun people is amazingly simple if you can just hear it: it's the ACCESS, stupid.

Psychologists even break suicide into two groups (I'm remembering roughly from an article I read over a year ago) of "deliberate" and "accidental." the second category meaning that if the person had a chance to pause and slow down, they may not have done it.

Cited in the same article were common-sense things like trigger locks and gun safes. The point made was that even a simple DELAY to access can cause a person to re-think. This is why fences on bridges are effective at reducing suicide ... obviously someone can climb them easily enough, so, a "deliberate" suicidal person will still jump, while and "accidental" might say to himself:

"Oh crap, I'm actually climbing up this thing to kill myself... this is crazy."

The article quoted a person who jumped from the Golden Gate Bridge (and lived). A split second after he was airborne he remembers think something like:

"I'm such a fool, I actually went through with this... NOW I want to live... F***!!!"

Some people think if we were all armed to teeth we'd live in a more peaceful society.

It's unfortunate that we have good, solid data (in many places, not just cited here) that shows otherwise. Yet we ignore it lest we be seen as antagonistic to vaguely-defined (lets be real here) Constitutional "rights."

I find THAT sadly ironic.

Texas Cannot Wait for Good Science in the Courtroom


Last week, Texas Governor Rick Perry removed three members from the Texas Forensic Science Commission. The changes come at a critical juncture in the investigation of the flawed forensics behind the conviction of Cameron Willingham, who was executed in 2004 for allegedly setting the fire that killed his three daughters.  

 

Governor Perry's removal of these three members from this commission has drawn national attention and sharp criticism because there is concern that his appointed replacement of the commission chair, John Bradley, may slow or stifle the investigation. Bradley has already cancelled a scheduled meeting on October 2, where the commission's retained fire expert, Craig Beyler, was to present and discuss his report. Beyler's report, released to the media under public information laws, confirms findings from three other expert reviews: that the arson evidence in the Willingham case was without scientific validity.

 

The canceled meeting is not the only casualty of this drastic change. Commission members have also decided to postpone a series of important roundtable discussions focused on a recent report of the National Academies of Science (NAS) about serious weaknesses in the nation's forensic systems because of the distractions caused by the shakeup.

Read more »

Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize - Conservatives explode like Agent Smith at the end of Matrix


UNITED STATES - In a stunning announcement today, U.S. President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his diplomatic efforts. Immediately following the announcements, Conservatives throughout the United States lost cohesion and exploded, much like the Agent Smith character did at the end of the Matrix.

"I was sitting next to Jonah Goldberg and Bill Kristol having breakfast," said an unnamed source. "We heard the news and I looked over to them and all I saw were pixels floating into space."

The Nobel Committee awarded Obama for the new "How About You Guys Not Start Any More Wars" category, with special emphasis on Iran. While millions of Americans have celebrated with pride that their President was awarded the prestigious prize, conservatives seemed unable to process the information.

"This, Van Jones, Jennings, Ayers ... " said Fox News star Glenn Beck, moments before imploding, causing a black hole that for 10 minutes sucked all hate into the area directly into it.

More on this story as it develops.

-WKW

Obama Wins Powerball


President Obama's Powerball ticket matched all six numbers this week, and he will walk away with the entire $180 million jackpot. The president purchased his winning $1 ticket at a QuickieMart in Georgetown where he had stopped in for coffee. He will now have to decide to either take the 29-year, 30-installment annuity, or the one time cash "lump sum" amount of $101,160,403. A spokesperson for Mr. Obama said that the president plans to keep his job and doesn't think the winnings will drastically change his life. He said the president will pay some bills and put the rest in the bank for now, and "maybe buy a Harley." Some political columnists have reacted negatively to the news, saying it "cheapens" the Powerball lottery, and that some out-of-office conservatives could have really used that prize right about now.

Obama Wins Powerball


President Obama's Powerball ticket matched all six numbers this week, and he will walk away with the entire $180 million jackpot. The president purchased his winning $1 ticket at a QuickieMart in Georgetown where he had stopped in for coffee. He will now have to decide to either take the 29-year, 30-installment annuity, or the one time cash "lump sum" amount of $101,160,403. A spokesperson for Mr. Obama said that the president plans to keep his job and doesn't think the winnings will drastically change his life. He said the president will pay some bills and put the rest in the bank for now, and "maybe buy a Harley." Some political columnists have reacted negatively to the news, saying it "cheapens" the Powerball lottery, and that some out-of-office conservatives could have really used that prize right about now.

TPM shows "Barack" and "Obama" as misspellings but not "Reagan" or "Clinton"


As I type this sentence, a little red line appears under Obama.  Go ahead, try it in a comment.  Obama.  Obama.  President Barack Obama.  Hey, it's under Barack too!  Barack.  Barack.

Barack Obama.

Those are the only two words in this message that are indicated as misspellings.  Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Barack Obama.  "Nobel" is OK.

I can understand proper names being "misspellings" like Biden, Clinton, WHOA!  No red line under "Clinton."  Hillary.  See, that's OK, too.  Reagan.  NOW THAT'S JUST WRONG!

OK, I've had enough fun.  Please update the TPM dictionary.

Nobel Peace Prize To Obama: A nice way to greet the day


The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."

Oslo, October 9, 2009


There's an advantage to having one's alarm go off at 5:45 and being on the east coast to boot.  I get to be first in something.  Yay me.


Now I can sit back and watch the right wing go nuts, Boehner turn a lighter shade of orange, Kyl swallow aspirins by the cupful, Beck blow up, Limbaugh sputter like an outboard working  on one cylinder.  And a few people here order the cold water hoses to dampen the enthusiasm.  But for now they don't interest me one whit.  I'm celebrating with another cup of coffee, toasting the Nobel Committee with it,  for honoring the dream and helping to encourage the rest of us to move it to reality.

Application Monitoring: Types of Solutions Available


Organizations in literally all industries today undertake application monitoring for knowing the performance of applications which are critical to their functioning. Through application monitoring tools, an IT administrator can not only know application performance, but can also check for unauthorized access or data theft, if any, within the network. IT administrators can also ensure that service level agreement terms are met by ensuring that all applications are performing impeccably. However, with today's businesses becoming more complicated and using multiple applications across various levels, it has become tough to get visibility into all applications and network technologies within the business. Such complex applications can be monitored through a custom-made application monitoring solution which covers the entire organization. But for the monitoring to be accurate and complete, the type of application monitoring needed must be identified. The following are the types of monitoring available for various applications:

  1. Monitoring for Security
  2. Business applications now have a global connection, and hence need to be monitored for security. Application monitoring for security ensures that the application, database as well as servers are implemented with security patches. Software products generally include a security warning, which needs to be studied and implemented in order to ensure that security standards are complied with and the application is safe from hackers. Generally, application monitoring tools are equipped to ensure that applications are updated with the latest versions of softwares. Security monitoring helps administrators with IT service management and also helps them avoid ongoing security threats through newsletters and other mediums.

  3. Application Monitoring for Errors
  4. An error in any application can result in failure to submit or display the requested information. In such a case, end users are the ones who are severely impacted. Such errors can be resultant to software problems related to the application like its code or the data base or servers. Problems can also arise due to hardware-related issues of CPU processing, network or memory. In such a scenario, application monitoring for errors is undertaken, which can pinpoint the cause for the error. Custom-made application monitoring tools are available today, which take into account the architecture of the application, platform, error messages, documentation etc. Error monitoring in applications is especially important in companies involved in IT service management.

  5. Performance Monitoring
  6. Application monitoring is also undertaken to judge performance of application, so that a good end user experience can be ensured. Application performance can be judged by monitoring the code of the application, which determines that a certain number of actual user requests can be handled. Application monitoring for performance is also derived from the supporting hardware, which provides capabilities for handling user requests through memory, processing etc.
    Application monitoring can determine the performance of applications by noting the time taken for access and request processing in the logs. One can judge the actual user experience by sending requests to applications for different location and then observing the real response time.

  7. Health Monitoring
  8. Application health monitoring helps IT professionals foresee any problems and solve them before they start affecting end users. Application health needs to be constantly monitored so that any issues can be solved before they become major problems. Application monitoring for health consists of comparing snapshots of system and application parameters to the standard benchmarks. Hence, IT professionals may, as part of application health monitoring, set up alerts in case response time for transactions increases more than the normal level.

  9. Configuration Monitoring
  10. IT professionals can avoid untested and undocumented configuration elements through configuration monitoring for applications. Releases of new applications and operating system changes can affect hardware as well as software configuration of any machine. In this scenario, IT professionals need to monitor each configuration change for any unauthorized change. The best application monitoring for configuration is a process within which change is implemented only on approval by authorized personnel. Through such application monitoring, the person in charge is always aware of the changes that have taken place in the configuration.

Obama Won the Nobel Peace Prize! Harharharhar!!!


Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize!

Harharharhar!!!

But some people aren't laughing.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

chardarah11

At first light last Friday, in the Chardarah district of Kunduz province in northern Afghanistan, the villagers gathered around the twisted wreckage of two fuel tankers that had been hit by a Nato airstrike.

"We didn't recognise any of the dead when we arrived," said Omar Khan, the turbaned village chief of Eissa Khail. "They were like burned tree logs, like charcoal."

"The villagers were fighting over the corpses. People were saying this is my brother, this is my cousin, and no one could identify anyone."

"I couldn't find my son, so I took a piece of flesh with me home and I called it my son."





My Blog


No joke - Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize


You know how Obama shown to be completely useless and all and got disrespected by the world at large because Chicago didn't get awarded the 2016 Olympics?

There's now only one answer to that charge:

Suck. On. This.

Barack Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize!!!!!!


Tough break for all those who bloviated he was rejected internationally over Olympics!
HOLY SMOKES!!!

Hostgator Coupon


Free online Hostgator Coupon offering discounts on dedicated servers, reseller hosting and shared web hosting with hostgator. Includes hostgator coupon for first month free and $25 discount.

4000, 40,000 or 400,000, armies are not the answer for fighting international crime.


There's a lot of debate going on lately after a top general in Afghanistan requested 40,000 more American troops to be moved there. That would probably help him accomplish what he wants and thinks should be accomplished. Eighty thousand would probably help him even more. I think it's the wrong approach.

I think it was and continues to be a mistake to use the American military to attempt to fight and respond to a crime of international hijacking and mass murder. The FBI and CIA in cooperation with other international law and intelligence agencies could have been used and should have been used to locate the 9/11 planners and preferably arrest, but if need be, kill them. Case closed.

What happens when a group of radicals in China send 19 to attack America? Do we send our armies into China?

What happens when a group of radicals in Russia send 19 to attack America? Do we send our armies into Russia?

What happens when a group of radicals in India send 19 to attack America? Do we send our armies into India?

If America politicians and citizens choose to continue to react to international crime by sending our military into the nations where the planning may have occurred then we're going to have one heck of a defense budget in our future and Afghanistan and Iraq will likely be just the beginning of us sending our young men and women into harms way into foreign nations in the 21st century.

What if a group of American radicals hijack and fly a plane into a downtown Beijing skyscraper? Does China then have a right to send its military to America to attempt to root out all potential threats to their homeland?

Hopefully the insanity will soon end. I believe the best, and possibly only hope, of this planet avoiding a horrendous unleashing of weapons in this century is the development of a strong and functioning international justice system to prosecute international crime and resolve international disputes. I believe it can be done. I believe it must be done.

John Kennedy said, "The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty, and all forms of human life."

With a robust, adequate and enforceable international justice system to resolve international disputes we could avoid Kennedy's concern over the abolishment of human life. International armies would no longer be needed and with the money saved from that we could also accomplish Kennedy's hope of ending poverty.

-- cross posted to Steve Everett Blog .com and Daily Kos

Historic Mental Health Break- Elizabeth Blackwell Gains Admission


I have a confession to make:  I love Lewis Lapham.   Yes he is often lampooned, (in particular Slate loves to mock his predictable pretentiousness) but I don't care.   I don't mind his occasional over the top metaphor or searing indignation at the idiocy of it all: why haven't we learned this yet?   Sure I often get angry too, but mostly I find his writings comforting-I like being reminded that there is a long view.  I simply love history.  That the same tiresome games of war and hubris are constantly replayed is certainly distressing, but it seems to me that the overall trend is clear- we are getting better.  We do slowly learn even if every two steps forward are often accompanied by a huge step backwards.

So When Mr. Lapham left his perch as editor of Harper's and started Lapham's Quarterly, I signed up immediately.  Each quarterly devoted to a particular topic and includes a series of disparate historical pieces from throughout the world (and time) around that theme.  The outrageously priced magazines are also beatiful, lushly printed on a heavy stock with a clean layout punctuated with tasteful maps and art.  Often I admit I don't get a chance to read them all but I skim them and give a good effort (between books, friends, TPM cafe!, and working- well time is short).  Maybe I am just an naive armchair wannabe, but I am fine with that.  The world is more intersting, and more hopeful.

Last night I read this piece and for some reason I found it quite moving.  From This quarter's issue:  Elizabeth Backwell Gains Admission.  (I have chosen not to blockquote it for ease of reading)




While making applications to the different medical colleges of Philadelphia for admission as a regular student, I enlisted the services of my friends in the search for an alma mater. The interviews with the various professors, though disappointing, were often amusing.

May 27
Called on Dr. Jackson (one of the oldest professors in Philadelphia), a small, bright-faced, gray-haired man, who looked up from his newspaper and saluted me with, "Well, what is it? What do you want?" I told him I wanted to study medicine. He began to laugh, and asked me why. Then I detailed my plans. He became interested, said he would not give me an answer then--that there were great difficulties, but he did not know that they were insurmountable; he would let me know on Monday. I came home with a lighter heart, though I can hardly say hope. On Monday, Dr. Jackson said he had done his best for me, but the professors were all opposed to my entrance. Dr. Horner advised me to try the Filbert Street and Franklin schools. A professor of Jefferson College thought it would be impossible to study there and advised the New England schools.

June 2

Felt gloomy as thunder, trudging round to Dr. Darrach. He is the most noncommittal man I ever saw. I harangued him, and he sat a full five minutes without a word. I asked at last if he could give me any encouragement.

"The subject is a novel one, madam, I have nothing to say either for or against it; you have awakened trains of thought upon which my mind is taking action, but I cannot express my opinion to you either one way or another."

"Your opinion, I fear, is unfavorable."

"I did not say so. I beg you, madam, distinctly to understand that I express no opinion one way or another; the way in which my mind acts in this matter I do not feel at liberty to unfold."

"Shall I call on the other professors of your college?"

"I cannot take the responsibility of advising you to pursue such a course."

"Can you not grant me admittance to your lectures, as you do not feel unfavorable to my scheme?"

"I have said no such thing; whether favorable or unfavorable, I have not expressed any opinion, and I beg leave to state clearly that the operation of my mind in regard to this matter I do not feel at liberty to unfold." I got up in despair, leaving his mind to take action on the subject at his leisure.

The fear of successful rivalry which at that time often existed in the medical mind was expressed by the dean of one of the smaller schools, who frankly replied to the application, "You cannot expect us to furnish you with a stick to break our heads with," so revolutionary seemed the attempt of a woman to leave a subordinate position and seek to obtain a complete medical education. A similarly mistaken notion of the rapid practical success which would attend a lady doctor was shown later by one of the professors of my medical college, who was desirous of entering into partnership with me on condition of sharing profits over five thousand dollars on my first year's practice.

During these fruitless efforts my kindly Quaker adviser, whose private lectures I attended, said to me, "Elizabeth, it is of no use trying. You cannot gain admission to these schools. You must go to Paris and don masculine attire to gain the necessary knowledge." Curiously enough, this suggestion of disguise made by good Dr. Warrington was also given to me by Dr. Pankhurst, the professor of surgery in the largest college in Philadelphia. He thoroughly approved of a woman's gaining complete medical knowledge, told me that although my public entrance into the classes was out of the question, if I would assume masculine attire and enter the college, he could entirely rely on two or three of his students to whom he should communicate my disguise, who would watch the class and give me timely notice to withdraw should my disguise be suspected.

But neither the advice to go to Paris nor the suggestion of disguise tempted me for a moment. It was to my mind a moral crusade on which I had entered, a course of justice and common sense, and it must be pursued in the light of day, and with public sanction, in order to accomplish its end.

The following letter to Mrs. Willard of Troy, the well-known educationalist, describes the difficulties through which the young student had to walk warily:

Philadelphia, May 24.
I cannot refrain from expressing my obligations to you for directing me to the excellent Dr. Warrington. He has allowed me to visit his patients, attend his lectures, and make use of his library, and has spoken to more than one medical friend concerning my wishes; but with deep regret I am obliged to say that all the information hitherto obtained serves to show me the impossibility of accomplishing my purpose in America. I find myself rigidly excluded from the regular college routine, and there is no thorough course of lectures that can supply its place. The general sentiment of the physicians is strongly opposed to a woman's intruding herself into the profession; consequently, it would be perhaps impossible to obtain private instruction, but if that were possible, the enormous expense would render it impracticable, and where the feelings of the profession are strongly enlisted against such a scheme, the museums, libraries, hospitals, and all similar aids would be closed against me. In view of these and numerous other difficulties, Dr. Warrington is discouraged and joins with his medical brethren in advising me to give up the scheme. But a strong idea, long-cherished till it has taken deep root in the soul and become an all-absorbing duty, cannot thus be laid aside. I must accomplish my end. I consider it the noblest and most useful path that I can tread, and, if one country rejects me, I will go to another.

Through Dr. Warrington and other sources, I am informed that my plan can be carried out in Paris, though the free government lectures delivered by the faculty are confined to men, and a diploma is strictly denied to a woman--even when (as in one instance, it is said) she has gone through the course in male attire. Yet every year, thorough courses of lectures are delivered by able physicians on every branch of medical knowledge, to which I should be admitted without hesitation and treated with becoming respect. The true place for study, then, seems open to me; but here again some friendly physicians raise stronger objections than ever. "You, a young, unmarried lady," they say, "go to Paris, that city of fearful immorality, where every feeling will be outraged and insult attend you at every step--where vice is the natural atmosphere, and no young man can breathe it without being contaminated! Impossible. You are lost if you go!"

After a short, refreshing trip with my family to the seaside, the search was again renewed in Philadelphia. But applications made for admission to the medical schools both of Philadelphia and of New York were met with similarly unsuccessful results.

I therefore obtained a complete list of all the smaller schools of the northern states, "country schools," as they were called. I examined their prospectuses and quite at a venture sent in applications for admission to twelve of the most promising institutions, where full courses of instruction were given under able professors. The result was awaited with much anxiety, as the time for the commencement of the winter sessions was rapidly approaching. No answer came for some time. At last, to my immense relief (though not surprise, for failure never seemed possible), I received the following letter from the medical department of a small university town in the western part of the state of New York:

Geneva, October 20.

To Elizabeth Blackwell,

I am instructed by the faculty of the medical department of Geneva University to acknowledge receipt of yours of application. A quorum of the faculty assembled last evening for the first time during the session, and it was thought important to submit your proposal to the class (of students), who have had a meeting this day and acted entirely on their own behalf, without any interference on the part of the faculty. I send you the result of their deliberations--and need only add that there are no fears but that you can, by judicious management, not only disarm criticism, but elevate yourself without detracting in the least from the dignity of the profession.

Wishing you success in your undertaking, which some may deem bold in the present state of society, I subscribe myself,

Yours respectfully,

Charles A. Lee, Dean of the Faculty


This letter enclosed the following unique and manly letter, which I afterward copied on parchment, and esteem one of my most valued possessions:

At a meeting of the entire medical class of Geneva Medical College, held this day, October 20, 1847, the following resolutions were unanimously adopted:

1. Resolved--That one of the radical principles of a republican government is the universal education of both sexes; that to every branch of scientific education the door should be open equally to all; that the application of Elizabeth Blackwell to become a member of our class meets our entire approbation; and in extending our unanimous invitation, we pledge ourselves that no conduct of ours shall cause her to regret her attendance at this institution.

2. Resolved--That a copy of these proceedings be signed by the chairman and transmitted to Elizabeth Blackwell.

--T. J. Stration, Chairman

With an immense sigh of relief and aspiration of profound gratitude to Providence, I instantly accepted the invitation, and prepared for the journey to western New York.

Leaving Philadelphia on November 4, I hastened through New York, traveled all night, and reached the little town of Geneva at 11 P.M. on November 6.

The next day, after a refreshing sleep, I sallied forth for an interview with the dean of the college, enjoying the view of the beautiful lake on which Geneva is situated, notwithstanding the cold, drizzling, windy day. After an interview with the authorities of the college I was duly inscribed on the list as student No. 130 in the medical department of the Geneva University.


Andrew Sullivan, there is "No Exit" for you on this one.


Andrew Sullivan abhors torture. How do I know? His naive plea to George Bush in the current Atlantic magazine tells me so.
But he's pretty much unconcerned about the half-million or so Americans who have died from lack of health insurance since he published Betsy McCaughey's lying screed, "No Exit," in TNR 15 years ago. How do I know? The Daily Dish tells me so.
In "McCaughey and Me," on October 7, Sullivan blogs that "I take full responsibility for being the editor of the magazine that published the piece. I accepted an award for it. I stood behind it."
Then he goes on to say he knew McCaughey's article was bogus but he enjoyed "driving liberals a little bit crazy" in those days. Here's the bottom line for Sullivan, though. "There's one reason the Clinton health care bill failed," he asserts, " and it isn't Betsy McCaughey. It's Hillary Clinton."
I'm glad you had your opportunity to have a little fun with the liberals, Andrew, but let me get this straight. You want the-buck-stops-over-there George Bush to own up to his responsibility for torture, but you plan to wiggle out of your own culpability for denying health care to a half-generation of Americans.
Sorry. There's no exit from this one.

More Fascist Repression in Honduras


Presidential decree banishing non-coup media

Executive Agreement Number 124-2009

The Constitutional President of the Republic

Considering: That the human person is the supreme end of society, the state, and all have the obligation to respect, protect, and conform to article 62 of our Constitution, the rights of every person are limited by the rights of the others, for the security of all, and for the just demands of the general good and the developing democracy.

Considering: That the President of the Republic and the Council of Ministers have answered, through the organs of defense and security of the State, and other entities, the deterioration which we have begun to have, the pretense of protected goods, by social communications media, systematically denaturing the objective of the Democratic State of law, and generating a regime of social anarchy encouraging vandalism up to the point of attempting against the social peace and the security of the state, and leaving incalculable effects on the national economy.

Considering: That it is an urgent necessity to preserve the public order and peace in all the national territory, to guarantee life and the well being of all people residing in the national territory, with the ultimate end, guaranteed by our constitution of the Republic, and with the democratic system, fundamental pillar of our society.

Considering: That it corresponds to the State to guarantee liberty of though and expression, but when the communications media attempt against the national security, the public order, the health, or the public morals, it makes it imperative to execute regulations founded in the existing legislation in conformity with the INTERAMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

Wherefore
The constitutional President of the republic, in conformance with the articles 245 points 7 and 16, 248 and 252 of the constitution of the Republic, articles 11, 17, 18, 20, 22 number 10, 24, 116, and 117 of the General Law of Public Administration and the rest that the constitution and the laws confer.

Agree
Article 1: Declare, for reasons of national security and in application of the commands in Article 28 of the case law of the Telecommunications sector, specifically that referring to the use of the radio spectrum in the national territory, apply the measures which in law correspond to those that infringe the law.

Article 2: Instruct for legal effects corresponding to the National Commission of Telecommunications (CONATEL) and other competent organs of the state, that they proceed in conformity with their laws, to protect the national security in the function of the larger interests of the country, the good, the physical and moral integrity of humans. The state, as owner of the radio spectrum can revoke or cancel the use of approved titles (licenses and permissions) authorized by CONATEL to operators of broadcast speech and television that emit messages that generate national abhorrence, pretend to be protected speech, and also call for a regimen of social anarchy against the democratic state that attempts against the social peace and human rights.

Article 3: Remit to the National Commission of Telecommunications (CONATEL), the communications contained, the reports emitted by the defense and security forces and other parts of the government for its fulfillment.

Article 4: The present accord is executed immediately and should be published in the official newspaper La Gaceta.

Given in the city of Tegucigalpa, municipality of the Central District the 5th of October of 2009.

Communicate and Publish this.

Robert Micheletti
Constitutional President of the Republic
Oscar Raul Matute Cruz
Secretary of State

[Dated Monday, October 5th, "effective immediately"]

Michetteli had just announced the recension of his previous decree due to international and domestic pressure.  But he has continued acting as if the previous decree was still in effect, stating that it won't stop until the recension is published in La Gaceta ( which is like our "Congressional Record.)  He stated that the printing press was broken, so he was compelled to continue denying Honduran people their basic constitutional guaranteed liberties. 

Meanwhile, Radio Globo is broadcasting clandestinely on Internet Radio from a secret location in Honduras.  You should be able to hear it at this link.  If you understand Spanish, you're in luck.  Actually, since the Gestapo shut down it's radio operation and they went underground, their numbers have grown enormously.  400K listeners now, 100K in Honduras. 

Channel 36 owner, Esdras Amado Lopez, is now in hiding after the Gestapo shut down his TV station.  He has received death threats, and believes that there is a warrant out for his arrest.

This is the reason the international community, including the US and OAS, feel that the November elections cannot be considered legitimate.  Michelleti keeps exacerbating the situation with his repression of civil freedoms, while rhetorically giving voice for his hope for free elections next month.  He has stated that if there is no president elect to take office in January, he will remain as president for the next two years.  Looks to me like this is his power play, folks - whine about elections while doing everything he can to make sure elections will not take place in Honduras.

Politico hacks away to connect Roman Polanski and President Barack Obama


It was always apparent that Politico.com was right of center, but in a nation that has Fox News and one of its parties inching toward a potentially frightening far right position, they have more or less blended into the scenery.


But no more. The Politico is making it clear that they are going after the fringe that has made Glenn Beck a ratings hero. Their most recent ploy: Doing whatever it takes to connect child rapist Roman Polanski with President Barack Obama.

First, on the front page you'll find them link a comment from Walter Russell Mead, Henry A. Kissinger senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy (which safely tells you where he stands on the political spectrum) who works hard to get Polanski and Obama into the same sentence:

The SNL skit reminds us of two things. First, that President Obama is no longer a fantasy figure, the anti-Bush who will heal all our ills. He's the struggling occupant of an office with constitutionally limited powers facing a complex assortment of challenges and hemmed in by constraints on all sides. He's the President of the United States, not the Wizard of Oz. Second, that Obama is losing the Roman Polanski vote. He's not only not the Wizard of Oz; he isn't the Hollywood Avenger, using his superpowers to transform the country into the kind of place our enlightened glitterati wished they lived in.

That's just for starters. Because inside Politico's Click section, they destroy any whiff of credibility and integrity they have, once and for all:

"Roman Polanski Backers gave $34K to Barack Obama, DNC"

Movie industry types calling for the release of director Roman Polanski last year gave $34,000 to Obama's presidential campaign and the Democratic Party, FEC records show.

Polanski's arrest late last month by Swiss authorities in connection with a three-decade-old California underage sex case has sparked a vigorous national debate about sex, justice and extradition that - thus far - has yet to draw in the Obama administration.

But the most generous Democratic donor of the vocal pro-Polanski contingent, Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, in an open letter called on "every US filmmaker to lobby against any move to bring Polanski back to the US, where he could face life in jail."

Weinstein last year gave $28,500 to the DNC and its White House Victory Fund, though he didn't contribute directly to Obama. In fact, he has been a big supporter of Obama's presidential rival-turned Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose campaigns and committees have received $88,000 from Weinstein over the years.

There's really not much to add to that bit of heinous GOP propaganda. They can say whatever they like about what section it was in, but the creators of Politico are likely secretly pleased - they are the new Fox News. Check that, Fox is on television. Instead, it's safer to say Politico is the new WorldNetDaily.

-WKW

Fingerprinting Texas' Teachers


Recently, the state of Texas started requiring all full-time teachers, substitute teachers, and other school employees to be fingerprinted before being allowed to teach. Teachers aren't allowed by law to go on strike and so were forced to go along or lose their teaching license. The teachers will also have to pay $40 themselves for their own fingerprints.

The lawmaker's intent they said was to prevent sex offenders from being in classrooms. Each teacher will be crosschecked with and added to a "massive national database for a criminal history background check and the data will also be shared with the FBI and Texas DPS"

However, state officials or school district admins have apparently been using the data for unintended uses. I know of at least one individual that was fired because he had a DUI in his past. If other schools discriminate against ex-felons the same way (and I believe they will), then it's likely this individual and others will never get a job in a Texas school ever again.

Without warning, he is being forced to change his career or leave the state. It's unfortunate, but Texas doesn't believe in second chances. I foresee more abuse of this system. Where are the protections for the employees? Am I missing something or is this wrongful termination? If it's not, the teacher unions in Texas need to push for a law to make illegal.

Gore Vidal's US of Fury


This article and interview in The British paper The Independent
is excellent. Here is just one part which, IMHO sums up our
current political situation quite well.
A Scotch is fetched for him as he is wheeled into the
corner of the bar. "I was like everyone else when Obama
was elected - optimistic. Everything we had been saying
about racial integration was vindicated," he says, "but
he's incompetent. He will be defeated for re-election.
It's a pity because he's the first intellectual president
we've had in many years, but he can't hack it. He's not
up to it. He's overwhelmed. And who wouldn't be? The
United States is a madhouse. The country should be put
away - and we're being told to go away. Nothing makes any
sense." The President "wants to be liked by everybody,
and he thought all he had to do was talk reason. But
remember - the Republican Party is not a political party.
It's a mindset, like Hitler Youth. It's full of hatred.
You're not going to get them aboard. Don't even try. The
only way to handle them is to terrify them. He's too
delicate for that."

Which I completely agree. The republican party is no-longer the
the opposition, but a group of extreme right wing fanatics.

When he compares Obama to his old friend Jack Kennedy, he
shakes his head. "He's twice the intellectual that Jack
was, but Jack knew the great world. Remember he spent a
long time in the navy, losing ships. This kid [Obama] has
never heard a gun fired in anger. He's absolutely bowled
over by generals, who tell him lies and he believes them.
He hasn't done anything. If you were faced with great
problems in chemistry - to find the perfect gas, to gas a
population - you won't know for a long time whether it
works. You have to go by what people tell you. He's like
that. He's not ready for prime time and he's getting a
lot of prime time on his plate at once."
This is so true. JFK was no brain - that was Bobby - but he did
have experience and knew how to get things done. His time
in the navy taught him how not to take any crap from anyone.
Obama lacks the single mindedness necessary to get his
programs passed. He wants or needs to be liked to much.

Sadly I do not see anyone waiting in the wings with the
necessary experience and cajones to be an efective
president. Not even Clinton.

Is there any hope? "Every sign I see is doom. But then
people say" - he adopts a whiny, nasal voice - "'Oh Mr
Vidal, you're so negative, can't you say something nice
about America? It's a wonderful country, everybody wants
to live here.' Oh yes? When was the last time you saw a
Norwegian with a green card who wanted to come here
because of the health service? I'll pay you if you can
find one."

But there is, he says with sudden perkiness, some "good
news. Afghanistan will be terminal for the American
empire, yes. Which is a happy way of looking at it. We'll
be out of the empire game, rapidly. But it's too late for
the country and the constitution." He raises his drink,
and smiles ironically. "To a better republic," he says,
and drinks in one long gulp.
It's quite a long article but well worth the read. I do like Gore Vidal's
style. An erudite intellect that can speak to the average person.

This interview in The Times of London is also quite good.
His voice strengthens. "One thing I have hated
all my life are LIARS [he says that with
bristling anger] and I live in a nation of
them. It was not always the case. I don't
demand honour, that can be lies too. I don't
say there was a golden age, but there was an
age of general intelligence. We had a watchdog,
the media." The media is too supine? "Would
that it was. They're busy preparing us for an
Iranian war." He retains some optimism about
Obama "because he doesn't lie. We know the fool
from Arizona [as he calls John McCain] is a
liar. We never got the real story of how McCain
crashed his plane [in 1967 near Hanoi, North
Vietnam] and was held captive."

Vidal originally became pro-Obama because he
grew up in "a black city" (meaning Washington),
as well as being impressed by Obama's
intelligence. "But he believes the generals.
Even Bush knew the way to win a general was to
give him another star. Obama believes the
Republican Party is a party when in fact it's a
mindset, like Hitler Youth, based on hatred -
religious hatred, racial hatred. When you
foreigners hear the word - conservative' you
think of kindly old men hunting foxes. They're
not, they're fascists."

Another notable Obama mis-step has been on
healthcare reform. "He f***ed it up. I don't
know how because the country wanted it. We'll
never see it happen." As for his wider vision:
"Maybe he doesn't have one, not to imply he is
a fraud. He loves quoting Lincoln and there's a
great Lincoln quote from a letter he wrote to
one of his generals in the South after the
Civil War. - I am President of the United
States. I have full overall power and never
forget it, because I will exercise it'. That's
what Obama needs - a bit of Lincoln's chill."
Has he met Obama? "No," he says quietly, "I've
had my time with presidents." Vidal raises his
fingers to signify a gun and mutters: "Bang
bang." He is referring to the possibility of
Obama being assassinated. "Just a mysterious
lone gunman lurking in the shadows of the
capital," he says in a wry, dreamy way.

Vidal now believes, as he did originally,
Clinton would be the better president. "Hillary
knows more about the world and what to do with
the generals. History has proven when the girls
get involved, they're good at it. Elizabeth I
knew Raleigh would be a good man to give a ship
to."The Republicans will win the next election,
Vidal believes; though for him there is little
difference between the parties. "Remember the
coup d'etat of 2000 when the Supreme Court
fixed the selection, not election, of the
stupidest man in the country, Mr Bush."
Read them both. They are really very good.


C

Building Bridges: Report from Honduras; Stella Workers Protest- 27:57


Building Bridges: Your Community and Labor Report
                             National Edition
        Produced by Ken Nash and Mimi Rosenberg
                **************************************
Joining Honduran President Zelaya In Brazilian Embassy
with
Andres Conteris, Director, Program on the Americas,
Nonviolence International, in the Brazilian Embassy
in Honduras where Pres. Zelaya has taken refuge
and
Tim Russo, Correspondent, Free Speech Radio News,
has been reporting live from Tegucigalpa, Honduras
since the return of Pres. Zelaya

 
More than 90 days since the military coup d'etat in Honduras Pres. Zelaya returned to join the resistance movement in the final stretch of the fight to restore constitutional order. Report from inside the Brazilian Embassy where Pres. Zelaya has sought sanctuary and from the streets of Honduras after the escalation of repression by the coup government. How is Zelaya lining up his support and strategy in these moments, how are the masses responding and what has been the role of the U.S.?.
******
Stella Workers Rally vs. Goldman Sachs & Mayor Bloomberg

Anti-union Lance Inc., based in No.Carolina is poised to buy Stella D'Oro cookies and if they do the Bronx plant will be shut and its unionized workers, who have waged a courageous struggle for more than a year will lose their jobs. So, the Stella workers and their supporters brought their pleas to keep the plant in New York to Goldman Sachs one of Lance's high-profile investors and then to Mayor Bloomberg to intervene to keep Stella D'oro in the Bronx.
 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To Download or listen to this  27:57   minute program, go to http://www.buildingbridgesradio.org  

Three Days in Vegas


What happens in Vegas:  stays in Vegas.   That's what the TV ads tell me.   But in my particular case I don't think it's appropriate.    I recently spent three days in Vegas and it was not an experience that I want left in Vegas.

I attended the annual reunion of the USS Albuquerque in Las Vegas.   I was a guest of the father of the most wonderful woman in the world.   For over 20 years I have lived with her but this was the first trip I have ever taken with her father.   It was an experience that was both humbling and educational.

It started as do so many reunions.  (I've worked enough over the years to know.)     The guy on the airport shuttle asking, "Pete, is that you?"   A hearty welcome and handshake offered from the man in charge of organizing the event as we entered the hotel.       There were helpful clerks at the hotel desk.   Our first evening dinner was the bad buffet in the Casino.   I could hardly wait to finish the day's events so I could make it to a poker table.

Sometime after that first really bad meal, I began to listen to the stories told by these Navy vets.   The USS Albuquerque was a Tacoma class frigate that sailed the oceans for some twenty five years under three different flags.   Commissioned in December of 1943, the Albuquerque did convoy duty between Alaskan ports and patrolled the Bering Sea.    Following WWII, it was loaned to the Russian Navy who returned it to the US in 1949.   It was re-commissioned for service in 1950 for use during the Korean War.  It was a small ship.  While her length was only slightly longer than a football field with a top speed of 20 knots (23 mph), she packed considerable punch for her size.  She was armed with three  3" 50 caliber guns,  four 40mm guns, nine 20mm guns, a Hedgehog anti-submarine mortar and 8 Y-gun depth projectors   (Note:  Even some 60 years later, it is not recommended to refer to her as a small ship.  It tends to upset her former crew.  I was certain I was going to have to break up a fight between the 70+ year old attendees and some former Navy man who had sailed on a destroyer.   My money was on the Albuquerque crew, by the way.)

 Staffed mainly by reservists, individual departments were headed by US Navy seamen for a total crew number of approximately 190 men.  I met some 20 of those men during my three days in Vegas.   To call it "interesting" is an understatement.   They were proud men.   Proud of their country.  Proud of their service.  Proud of their ship and proud of their accomplishments in the years following their service.   They introduced me to their wives (several of them Asian) and their children.

I heard a lot of stories.   (I think they appreciated having a "newcomer" to their reunion.  All the stories were new to me.)   I kidded them that I truly believed that at least one or two of those stories were actually true.    The reality is that I hope that many were NOT true.   Frenchy's story of loading wounded below decks while blood poured over him still gives me chills.   Stories of cold, long nights and the fear that these men felt during night time battles were especially upsetting when you realized that back then, they were not the "elders" I came to know, but "kids" just like the ones we send into battle today.

I heard stories of humor.   Stories of the ship's dog who disappeared on shore leave, never to return to the Albuquerque.   And it was obvious that his disappearance still upset the crew.   I heard stories of the problems that first generation Mexican-American sailors had in commanding "good ol' boys" from Texas.   I still remember the sadness in Pete's face as he told me of his "special case".   A man he kept on his personal watch.  A man who flatly refused to take orders from a "spick" but returned to the boiler room because Pete knew he was too good a man to let his fellow comrades down.   Pete really liked this big Texan.   As a member of the regular Navy, he had a few "tricks" the reservist didn't know.   But according to Pete, the Texan was a good learner.  They became friends and Pete was devastated many years later when after decades, he finally tracked him back to Texas through the internet only to discover he had died a few months earlier.   

I began to understand that Pete's love of teaching "tricks" to his high school shop students was a part of him that reached all the way back to his own youth.   I began to see that the discipline he practiced both as a reserve cop and a teacher stretched back over half a century to that boiler room on the Albuquerque.

I will always remember the night of the final banquet.    He began to show me his medals in the hotel room as we dressed for dinner, explaining each one and why he had received it.   I pointed out that knowing his daughter and grandchildren, I would never believe he had "earned" the good conduct medal.  He confided to me that he only had it because he hadn't ever got caught.  And in the midst of the stories and the laughs,  the phone rang.   It was the banquet organizer wondering if we were coming or not.   The dinner had started a half hour earlier and we had never noticed the time, for once the "ever punctual" Pete was late!  I'm so glad.   That was a golden half hour for me.  It was worth the mad dash through the casino floor with Pete's wheelchair since they were holding dinner for our arrival.

The final banquet was fun.  The pictures I got of a Marilyn Monroe impersonator sitting on Pete's lap should be useful blackmail material for many years to come.   The food was good, the laughs were better.   But what I shall remember most was the overwhelming love of country that these men displayed.   I've met and spoken with a lot of vets over the years. They are like any group, some great and some not so great.  Some who take pride in their service and some who want to know what they get for it.  I truly believe that any and all vets deserve recognition for their service, but this was special.  On this night every ex-sailor regardless of age or physical condition stood proud.   There was no snarling over what had been "done" to them.    No complaints on what they had or had not received for their service.  There was only pride.   Pride that they had been asked many years ago to serve....and to a man, the crew of the USS Albuquerque served their country well!  God bless you all!

The storm continues......


Well I thought it was a good title. It has been raining and thundering all day.In the house it has been nothing but sunshine,the boy came home from the hospital today and is at his own home.Unfortunatly he dont remember it and has some big problems with memory. We were joking with him about the movie 30 first dates. becouse now he is somewhat like that he remembers everybody and can tell you what has happened today  but cant remember yesterday at all.

  Then there is the bad news but it isnt even that bad now that he is home. I went online to look at jobs in my area and for the first time I can remember  there were none on the job website.The only jobs I could find on there that were even close to what I was doing were over 200 miles away(talk about daily commute) and they didnt pay anywhere near what I was making. So for now it looks like I will be a jobless bum.(hope I didnt offend anyone with that statement but I have to keep joking or I will go nuts)

 Well I hope everyone is having a wonderful day!! 

Remember life is to short to worry about the small stuff enjoy anything and everything that you can!!!

TPM Reporting


Thanks for the recent excellent reporting on health care/insurance reform and the more comprehensive D. C. reporting in general.  It is good to see, I think, a decline in the lurid stuff.









THE FOUR FINGER SALUTE


Miguel Cabrera

D


Okay. It is the bottom of the third inning. The game is tied at one run each. The lead batter hits a line drive to the third basemen. The third baseman, attempting to look cool for the camera puts up his glove, appears to snag it and immediately drops the ball.

Now there is a man on first.


Read more »

American Lobbying Efforts for Micheletti in Honduras : Former ties to Hillary Clinton and John McCain. (Oops.)


The New York Times is reporting that lobbyists have been paid at least $400,000 so far to lobby Congress on behalf of the defacto Micheletti government after Manuel Zelaya was deposed.  Cold War warriors Otto Reich, Roger Noriega, and Daniel Fisk, who served under Bush and Reagan and authored much of the US policy toward Central America, have signed on to support Micheletti.  They apparently view the struggle as crucial to striking a blow against Hugo Chavez, whose influence they equate with that of the former Soviet Union.

Read more »

Don't Let States Opt Out Of The Public Option


Ezra Klein suggests today that a reasonable compromise on the public option would be to let states, by whatever legislative or administrative methods they want, opt out of offering a public health care option to its citizens.

I admit that this has some appeal.  It'd make some red state governors really have to put their political courage behind their convictions and it'd prevent the states from complaining that nationalized health care is being "rammed down their throats" or some such nonsense. This one could score some pretty big political points.

But it's entirely immoral. No governor should be allowed to stand in the way of an individuals who want to avail themselves of the public health care option. The option part of "public option" is supposed to stand for an individual's choice, not for a legislature's choice, a governor's choice or even a referendum.

We've already debased the public option by not making it available to every individual who would rather contract with the government rather than a private insurance company. To allow states to put up ideological road blocks in the way of people who might need or want the public option isn't a compromise we can live with.

That we're even having this discussion is proof of a compromise that's gone too far. Most of us were always happy to say "If you love your private insurer, keep them." That was a fair compromise from single payer. As soon as we compromised again and didn't allow the public option to be available to any citizen who would choose it over another we gave up too much. Let's not make that mistake again.

Cooking light


The project is supported by European CommissionProject aims:to enhance availability of educational opportunities and conditions for disabled learnersto exchange good practices about heatlhy lifestyle experiences, physical exercises, and healthy recipesTo give an opportunity for adult education trainers to learn and benefit from each othersEnd products:DVD- containing interviews with adult members, physical exercises, and healty recipes for disabled peopleWebsite - opportunity to adult members to exchange information, experienceStudies - summarising information about national health systemsContact:Tel: +36 1 3174417Contact person: Herczog KrisztinaE-mail:.  If you are eager to find out about body mass more, then read the following article: "What Body Mass Index is" in our publications collection and finding healty recipes in diet recipes directory.  World Food Recipestalk about food recipes, healty recipes, kids recipes, soups, chicken recipes and many

I am so tired of grilled chicken and steamedveggies -- and I know that a varied diet is important for me -- but Idon't have any good 'healty' recipes at my disposal. 
Cooking Light Recipes

Say it ain't so, BHO!


Well, looks like Obama, following the expert military advice of wanna be - general Joe Biden, instead of real life, actual general McCrystal, is prepared to flush 8 years of sacrifice and effort and surrender Afghanistan to the Taliban. Oh, they won't call it that, they just are prepared to cede control of large parts of the country to the Taliban, because, hey, they are no threat to us. Of course, the last time they controlled the country there was that little 9/11 incident. But I'm sure things will be different this time. Heck, they'll be too busy killing all those people that cooperated with us and stoning the little girls who went to school to get around to attacking us again for years. Months at least. No worries, another fine job Obama.

Pelosi says new tax is 'on the table' - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/61783-pelosi-says-new-tax-is-on-the-table

My colleague Ron Vargo forwarded the above article to me. Please take a look at it, and then read the slightly wonkish reply I sent to Ron:

Quite interesting. Enacting a VAT in the U.S. would mean creating new compliance systems, and since in Europe the VAT passes through as a tax to the consumer, I think that a VAT will increase the burden on the working and middle classes more than it would increase the burden on the wealthy (the wealthy simply can afford to pay more for their goods and services, so it won't hurt as much). A few things about the VAT: In the U.K., where I have some clients, there is an income tax that's higher than the U.S. income tax. Do you remember the George Harrison song "Tax Man?" It has the line "nineteen for you and one for me..." In the 1960s, the U.K. tax was 95% (it's since gone down quite a bit). So the VAT cannot completely replace the income tax, at least not in the countries that currently use the VAT.

 

Also note: the European VAT doesn't apply to sales to foreigners who are taking the goods out of Europe. It may be that our tax treaties will require the U.S. to do the same. This means that goods sold to tourists at duty-free shops, or sold overseas through the Internet, won't be taxed by the U.S. I see a potential for revenue loss.


If time permits, I'll expand on this in a future posting.



There WERE War Crimes in Gaza!



Any attempted analogy to the Blitz in WW2, or Hamburg, or Dresden or Hiroshima - doesn't wash! The atrocity in Gaza was not collateral damage.

Let me put it very clearly SO THAT THERE IS NO AMBIGUITY:


ISRAELI TROOPS ALLEGEDLY TARGETED AND DELIBERATELY KILLED

OVER 300 CHILDREN AND ONE HUNDRED OF THEIR MOTHERS IN ORDER

TO TERRORIZE THE CIVILIAN POPULATION.

It is in the official report, the principal facts of which are not in dispute.

Those who authorized the killings and those who carried out those orders need to be brought before the International Criminal Court to answer charges. If they claim not to have deliberately killed women and children, the evidence will prove their guilt or innocence.

The ICC is in Europe, not the US, and no one is immune from the prosecution of war crime.




New Social Media Campaign Takes on Climate Bill


Climate change impacts many of our lives in terms of voluntary lifestyle adjustments, but for millions around the world it's a life-and-death matter right this minute. Droughts are causing crop failure, floods and storms are threatening and destroying communities, and tropical diseases are rebounding.

Fortunately, vulnerable and poor communities are developing and implementing adaptations that will help them adjust to these grave realities. The Senate has the power to help out with this by including robust international adaptation funding in the climate bill, and we can all help ensure that they do so:


Read more »

Doesn't the Opt-Out Public Option Equal the Public Option?


Well the press is reporting that the opt-out public option compromise proposed by Senator Tom Carper (D) from Delaware is gaining steam. But practical speaking is there any difference between the two. Certainly, moderate Senators can make a claim of limiting government influence on their constituents medical lives by insisting on the Opt-out. But once this legislation passes, which states are going to opt out of the public option? With 65% of the public supporting the option which states governors and/or legislatures are going to reject for their constituents the benefit of lower medical costs and insurance rates? Is there a state that over time has more to gain by opting out?

Maybe our good old governor from Louisiana, Bobby Jindal will find some way to opt-out and opt-in at the same time, similar to what he did with stimulus money. How about our good old trail hiker governor from the South Carolina; he could publicly reject the plan, while his state legislature works to undermine his decision as they did with their stimulus package. Texas? Minnesota?

If in fact some states decide to opt-out how will the surrounding opt-in states deal with border crossers looking for medical care at opt-in rates?


Believing a victory is possible in Afghanistan is foolish


Oct. 8,2009 

By

Joseph Chez 

Eight years at war in Afghanistan and the nation questions;' how many more? 

Yes, this week marks the 8TH year anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan - the forgotten war that a great majority of Americans has placed in the back or their minds.   However, American forces have suffered significant casualties as well as countless severe and disabling war related injuries.  Moreover, the ballooning deficit facing the nation is partly the result of the no-ceiling expense for the war. 

Today, our economy is moribund and many question if whether the nation is capable of further economic drain.  This is one reason national polls are showing wavering support for the war.  In contrast, the White House is feeling pressured from the GOP and the Pentagon for continued involvement and even troop level increases.  But soon, the President will be deciding on what will be the course for the war - whether to embrace Gen. McChrystal's request for more troops or perhaps come to the realization that it is not in the best interest of the country to continue a military presence in Afghanistan. 

But something is needed as the status quo appears not to have an ending.  However, the President must also conclude that remaining in that part of the world will not keep us safe here at home, for if that were to be true, we would have to be in every part of the world - forever. 

The final caveat : a war with no viable exit strategy may only cause a protracted war that will further strain our economy, weaken our military readiness and not provide the country with meaningful safety.  The answer is therefore not difficult; let's get out before the sandpit turns to quicksand. 

IGMR Live Today at 8PM (EST): "FRENEMIES: What can we learn from political conflict?"


Join us live tonight! Phones are open so feel free to call in, on or off topic!

********
The line between whatever I do and journalism blurred this week when I found myself on the phone with Lou Dobbs (OK I called him but he did RETURN my call), asking about a story he "scrubbed" from his site. Like my conversation with Andy from WorkingClassCorner.com, it was pleasant enough. Why shouldn't it be? Have we given up learning from each other or is the dialogue so poisoned that we NEED to stop talking? Let's talk about it.

Schumer's-Carper's Opt-Out Public Option Compromise


What people simply don't realize is that Social Security and even Medicare is not completely universal. Regarding Social Security the Big Railroad Retirement Pensions did not participate and neither did many others like the Post Office, some State (public and state teacher trusts) employees like Colorado's PERA or Wisconsin's WEA.

If some states for whatever reason politically or what not do not want to participate in what is unquestionably a better financial formula to manage healthcare (or as Obermann puts it "stave off death") than by all means let them try. Like a number of states that underfund and underappreciate public and collegiate education, there will be state societies that will gravitate to the bottom of the social-economic ladder while other states more progressive will gravitate near the top.

Putting together a research report as to why Colorado's major metro areas experienced greater job loss than other cities even though Colorado didn't have major auto or manufacturing business it became clear that the state still didn't have the depth or breath of a wide variety of industry sectors like Boston & Dallas (comparable Denver), Madison & Austin (two cities comparable to Colorado Springs) that not only included new tech firms, but also a deeper commitments to education, engineering, healthcare and finance.

If it takes the form of "choice" to trojan horse what is fundementally necessary for this nation to move forward where 2/3's of the states "Opt-In" with possibly 80% of the populace than so be it. Eventually state legislatures become very practical and rational when faced with the prospects of not being able to pay for things.

 

Thanks to Corporate Blanche & Mark the Bible Thumper, Arkansas Now 48th In Health Care


Here's the headline from today's Arkansas Democrat-Gazette:
U.S. Care Rankings Put Arkansas At 48
That's why we don't need no stinkin' health care reform down here. The article goes on to say:
"Arkansas' quality of health care, particularly for children, helped it edge up in a new state-by-state ranking of health systems.

"It climbed just one spot, and only because of a revision of the previous report by the Commonwealth Fund. Because of, in part, too many overweight children, cigarette smoking adults and people who avoid doctor visits for a variety of reasons, the state still ranks among the very worst, at 48th.

"The fund, a private foundation pushing for a national health-care overhaul, released the assessment today. Only Louisiana, Oklahoma and Mississippi fared worse thanArkansas among the states and Washington, D.C."

We "edged up!" Don't you love it? Here's the part I like best. The reason our quality of health care down here is so bad, is because our children are fat, we smoke too much and we don't like to go to the doctor. It's all our fault, don't you see. We, after all, are the "consumers" of health care and we choose not to consume as much as we need.

Wait a minute. Wait just a damned minute. That's what we're supposed to do, isn't it? Consume less health care? You bet. The health care system would be sound if only health care consumers would consume less health care. After all, that's the reasoning behind higher co-pays and lower caps and individual health savings accounts. Make consumers pay more so they'll use less and health care will improve.

So I say the Commonwealth Fund has it backwards and the Arkansas Dem-Gaz headline should read:

Arkansas and 3 Other States Lead In Health Care Improvement

"Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Mississippi lead the way in reducing the utilization of health care providers. 'Our citizens are doing their part to make the health care system healthier,' said Corporate Blanche Lincoln, announcing the latest findings from the Commonwealth Fund that show Arkansans among the leaders in avoiding health care.

"Linked arm-in-arm with the Board Chairman and CEO of Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, Corporate Blanche went on to thank Walmart, another Arkansas-based corporation, for their sustained efforts in driving down health care costs by discouraging the use of health care. 'If we keep this up,' Lincoln said, 'our corporations will become more competitive on the global stage and our health care consumers will see that curbing consumption is good for the economy.'

"Mark Pryor was unavailable for comment, because they keep him in the back room with the bibles and away from modern technologies like recording devices."

How to Make Voter Registration Accessible to All Citizens


Cross-posted at Project Vote's Voting Matters Blog

After the 2008 election, voter registration has become a focal point for legislators and advocates from all ends of the spectrum. Whichever way it is sliced, the number of registered eligible voters has still declined since 2004. As multiple problems have been cited as the cause for lowered registration rates (including mobility issues, unequal access to registration opportunities, voter caging, and even so-called apathy), voting rights advocates as well as legislators have been vocal about their solutions.


Read more »

I'm a monkey-boy sitting up in a turtle-shell


all by my lonesome, and i feel fine.

for those who most likely don't understand: Would offering the following be enlightening?

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

dis am a nice way to set it too. i recently had back surgery for what seems a multitude of cancers in it.

now i have been set up in a back brace by some therapists.
a monkey-boy in a turtle shell, and i feel fine

Weekly Diaspora: A Return to Reason


By Nezua, Media Consortium Blogger

After the shadowy Bush years, the emergence of reasonable policy can be a little surprising. Immigration law has suffered from a lack of planning and is often influenced by fear rooted in the Sept. 11 attacks. But the national dialogue on immigration has begun to grow healthier. Activists, immigration advocacy groups and Latino and Asian American communities dug in and are working toward reform. Right wing and anti-immigration voices have less sway. This week we see two tangible and positive developments on this front: An announcement from the White House regarding detention policy reform and a letter against aggressive enforcement sent to the White House from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Read more »

Our Abject President Sucks Up to China


It's fair to say that some of the shine has worn off Barack Obama in the foreign press.

The Times of India ran a lede like Republican talking-points...

The loud sucking noise you hear? That's President Barack Obama kissing up to the Chinese.

The Telegraph says...

President Barack Obama has refused to meet the Dalai Lama in Washington this week in a move to curry favour with the Chinese.

And the Wall Street Journal (of course) criticized Obama for meeting with Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez but declining to meet a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and international advocate for human rights, and for once even Jon Stewart agreed with that rag...

"There's no one that Obama won't be willing to try speak with, except for one exception... The Dalai Lama? The only person Obama draws the line at speaking with is the international prince of peace."

The Washington Post had a full report...

In an attempt to gain favor with China, the United States pressured Tibetan representatives to postpone a meeting between the Dalai Lama and President Obama until after Obama's summit with his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao, scheduled for next month, according to diplomats, government officials and other sources familiar with the talks.

For the first time since 1991, the Tibetan spiritual leader will visit Washington this week and not meet with the president.

Get down on all fours, Obama! Now bark for China!

Get down, America!

And get used to the view from below.

Rules in playing free online Poker


Texas Hold'em? --- When you think about it, then you think of poker as well. That's natural, Hold'em that you see being played on TV constantly. But there are selections of free online poker which existed, and all of them share certain basic rules.

All poker games engage betting on the strength of a poker hand, and attributed to a "pot" that those bets join. The player with the strongest hand, or the only player left in the pot after everyone else folds, gets the pot.

In some poker games, the pot is divided between the highest hand and the lowest hand at the table. These games contain Stud 8 and Omaha 8. Also, in Razz, the pot is granted to the player with the lowest hand at the end of all rounds of betting.

All poker games also feature a binding bet of some kind. In stud and draw poker games, this is typically called an "ante" and is gambled every hand. In holdem games, this is usually called a "blind" and is gambled when it's the player's turn to post the blind. Some holdem games include antes besides blinds.

These are some of the basic rules to be considered when playing free online poker, and want to win the pot.

So very serious


 Je suis un homme sérieux. (I am a serious man)  Charles de Gaulle fancied himself one. So did Richard Nixon.  They are annoying because they take themselves so, so very seriously and insist by their body language and wooden faces, that we all do the same.

The Latin gravitas, having substance, weight, is another word that describes them. They are unwilling to loosen up. For some weird reason that I don't understand their affectation works with the hoi polloi or, as H. L. Mencken described them, the great American booboisie.  

Two of the most fatuous clowns strutting about the current stage are unctuous, righteous Joe Lieberman, and the scowling, so-very-responsible William Bennett.  Whenever I see either one on the box, I grind my teeth, not necessarily at what they have to say, but rather their pontificating certainty.  Lou Dobbs is another "serious man" whom idiots apparently find believable.

When I see William Bennett sitting there in a CNN lineup of political "analysts" scowling, certain that he is morally correct and better than everybody else, I want to land the top of my foot in his cojones.  He is not just another body that CNN rounded up to comment on, say, the incoming election results. He is suffering to be included among them as an apparent equal. He is better then them, and he wants us all to know it. When he, harrumph, makes a comment, it is with a scowl. He suffers the question from his lesser. As a voice of authority, his is second to his precious God.

William Kristol tries to affect gravitas, but he is too lightweight to pull it off. Newt Gingrich also does his best, but in the end, he is a giggle. This narcissistic condition is mostly, but not entirely, a conservative affectation. For all his many worthwhile achievements, Jimmy Carter, alas, is sometimes a bit much. He has a pious upper lip.  David Gergen manages to stop just short of being an offensive homme sérieux.  He does this by a remarkable ability to appear sensible and halfway independent. And every once in a while, he will concede a point or agree with somebody else.

Among females, Barbara Walters is the best example of this species. In one of my early novels, I had Fidel Castro escape incognito from a hotel in New York. As he shaves his beard, he wonders what it would be like to shag Ba-wa Wa-wa. Would she show emotion?

The charm of the Clintons is that they are able to display a range of genuine human feeling. Hillary Clinton's wonderful haw, haw, haw laugh takes over her face. It is genuine. And it is delightful. Barack Obama can give a terrific speech one day and show up at a working-class hamburger joint the next.  He can play basketball or shuffle out to the mound in baggy jeans to deliver the first pitch of the baseball season. As the Aussies would say, good on 'im.

Having set out my thesis of offensive posturing and faux seriousness, I encourage you all to reply with more examples. Or dump on me. Your druthers. I finish this post with a smile. I am serious yes, but I also appreciate the craziness.

 

DEAR KEITH: DEAL ME IN


The cause of our lives is calling. This cause is health care for all. Last night Keith Olbermann made an impassioned plea for help during his one hour documentary. He was calling us to arms. Calling us to get in on the debate, calling on us to make sure we get a Public Health Insurance Option included in any bill that passes both houses in the end.

Keith called for free clinics to be set up in several locations around the country; one of those places is my home town, Butte, Montana. I am not a physician, but I am a nerd, and I have volunteered to set up the computers and network, to help research existing grants to fund the free clinic, we all know nothing is free. I will travel back and forth between my home and Butte as often as possible. We must have a plan to get grants to sustain the program, to work with local medical and dental schools and public health programs to staff these clinics.  We must get any software donated to the clinic or have donors purchase the software necessary to keep accurate records and build solid health databases on patients. Coordinating with state guidelines and requirements for clinics will be important; we will most certainly need other type of professionals volunteering their expertise to set up these clinics.

As I go along in this adventure I will keep you informed on what is happening during each step. Remember; if you can volunteer please do so. I think this is the only way we can be heard.

National Association of Free Clinics

http://freeclinics.us/

 

« September 27, 2009 - October 3, 2009 | Home | October 11, 2009 - October 17, 2009 »
Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Cafe Features

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »

Inside Cafe





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address