TPMCafe
« June 14, 2009 - June 20, 2009 | Home | June 28, 2009 - July 4, 2009 »

Week of June 21, 2009 - June 27, 2009

HPV VACCINE PROPAGANDA?


At first, scare tactics were used to convince parents that pre-teen girls needed to be protected from eventual infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV) that has been implicated in many cervical cancer cases. Oral and genital cancers in males and females have been linked to prior HPV infection, but this was not mentioned much during the early publicity. Some two dozen states were headed for a vaccination mandate for girls.

 

So after the first quarter of 2007, when Merck pulled the plug on its overt lobbying for their Gardasil vaccine, did the lobbying go deeper underground?

 

Within a day or so of Farrah Fawcett's death from cancer, physicians who had not treated Ms. Fawcett were pontificating about how it was entirely possible that a sexually transmitted disease (HPV) caused Fawcett's disease. The CDC attributes 90% of anal cancers to HPV, but still isn't this all conjecture on the part of these physician pundits? Do you really believe that tissue biopsies are routinely screened for papillomavirus?

 

Regardless of whether you think tween boys and girls should be routinely vaccinated against HPV, did you know that effective July 1, 2008, Gardasil is one of several vaccines required by immigrants seeking permanent residence? 

 

The criteria for vaccines required for immigration is that the vaccines are 1) age-appropriate, 2) protect against a disease that could cause a disease outbreak or  protect against a disease that has been eliminated or being eliminated in the United States. The other vaccines include rotavirus, hepatitis A, meningococcal, and zoster.

 

So now, another expensive vaccine stands in the way of an immigrant's legal status?

Can A Hypocrite Ever Be Elected To High Public Office?


Is hypocrisy compatible with political success?

I wish to suggest that with only rare exceptions, it is almost impossible for a hypocrite to be elected to statewide or national office - Senator, Governor, or President.

Before stating my argument, I would ask that we relegate to some other thread the case of Mark Sanford, although his recent adventures inspired me to think about the issue. Here, I prefer to focus on claims of hypocrisy related to policy disagreements exclusive of private behavior. I've already mentioned elsewhere why I'm not yet convinced of Sanford's alleged hypocrisy, the Clinton impeachment proceedings notwithstanding, and I'll be happy to defend that position, but I believe it would distract from the principles I try to enunciate here. Please bear with me.

Years ago, I enjoyed a brief stint as an actor, until the military draft decided it had a better claim on my time. On discharge from the Army, I abandoned acting as a career and went on to other forms of make believe. During my thespian days, I became schooled in the so-called "method" style of acting, made famous by such luminaries as Marlon Brando, Paul Newman, and many others. The underlying principle of the "method", accepted by most actors including those who did not formally endorse it, involves a simple principle - in order to be most convincing on stage, an actor must imagine himself or herself as the character in question, in the circumstances of the play, and then use that imagination to respond emotionally as well as physically to those circumstances. To illustrate, if the situation is one that evokes anger, you must imagine it happening to you, and the anger will follow. Method actors are not schizophrenic, and realize they are acting, but while acting, they allow themselves to believe in the drama the playwright set out for them.

Why has method acting been so successful? Simply because an audience can tell the difference between an actor who is sad or angry, and one who is merely trying to act the way a sad or angry person acts. To phrase it even more generally, a skilled actor knows that while performing, he or she must truly believe what the playwright asks the character to believe, and not merely pretend to believe it.

Actors are not unique in the ability to believe what they must  in order to succeed. Almost all of us have this talent to some degree - we manage to convince ourselves our arguments are valid when it serves our interest to do so. Only a small minority seem at times to lack this talent. These are individuals who go by the name of "scientist", and at least while practicing their profession, often seem unable to believe anything except what the data and logic at their disposal compel them to accept.  Outside of science, however, most scientists seem as capable of advantageous believing as the rest of us.

Pretending to believe something can sometimes fool an audience as long as the audience is not also exposed to someone whose belief is sincere. That is exactly the type of competition politicians face. How then, should someone with political aspirations proceed? Given a policy controversy, he or she might practice emulating the gestures and intonations of a sincere believer, or instead practice how to truly believe in the position best suited to political advancement. In my view, most politicians, like method actors, have found that learning how to believe works far better than learning how to pretend believing. That is why I tend to doubt that many hypocrites can match true believers in competition for high public office.

What does the logic underlying policy positions have to do with these character traits? Almost nothing, in my opinion. Imagine that Senator X claims to be a champion of the average American family, and then advocates tax breaks exclusively for the corporations and the wealthiest members of the electorate. Can you believe those tax breaks are best for working Americans? Maybe not, but Senator X can. He may get there via logical contortions that would challenge the most double-jointed of performers, but he manages to do it, which is why he is a Senator, while others holding the same views have failed to advance politically.

The reason I make this argument is that I suspect much rhetoric and emotional energy is wasted on denouncing politicians as hypocritical when the more important question is whether what they profess, sincere or occasionally insincere, stands the test of logic and reality. In my view, it will always be more effective in a political debate to challenge not an adversary's sincerity, but rather the merits of the position he or she advocates.

The danger of accusing politicians of hypocrisy is that through their ability to believe what serves their purposes, they will convince the public your accusation is false, thereby distracting from the merits of the case, where you may have the upper hand.

 

 

things to miss this july 4th


well i havent blogged for awhile and thought I wouldnt again but here I am anyway.

 There are a lot of things to miss this july 4th, some becouse of moving some becouse of laws that have changed and some becouse of personel changes.

 1] The big family get together. We use to have a lot of people around drinking and watching fireworks. Now I live to faraway to go

 2] Mentioning fireworks they have changed the laws so much that a lot of them cant be set off like bottle rockets and stuff like that. In some places you have to pay for a permit and in others you cant set them off at all. What is the 4th of july without fireworks?

 3] getting drunk and watching fireworks  well that one is gone becouse I dont drink anymore.

Now becouse of this is not to say I wont be celebrating the 4th of july but it sure has changed things a lot. I will have my grandkids over and set off fireworks(for now there mostly legal here)

and have a cookout,  With that said I'd like to hear how are you celebrating this 4th of july?

 

Hope everyone is having a nice day'

The Weather Conspiracy vs Cap and Trade


I understand that many people are excited and concerned about the "Global Warming" Phenomenon.

When I hear this, I wonder how many are familiar with the book "The Weather Conspiracy; The coming of the New Ice Age".

This is a book written and published by a group of weather and climate 'experts' in the 1970's. At that point in our history the 'experts' were convinced the earth was cooling too fast, and we would soon have another ice age. To the thinking person, this of course, meant that we had global warming and global cooling in the past. Long before mankind was creating CO2 gases.

Less than 25 years later Al Gore was claiming global warming was upon us, we must take quick action to prevent the end of our way of life.

 

Many years ago, someone told me, "When rich people do something unusual, look and see how it affects their money." Now we know that Al Gore has managed to increase his net worth from roughly 3 million to near 100 million dollars in less than 10 years. In my opinion, Al Gore should go down in history as another PT Barnum.

 

There is no question that large cities, with their asphalt, concrete, and air conditioning will increase the temperate. There is also no doubt that temperature monitoring stations, set up 30-40 years ago in rural areas, are now near or even in, large cities, thus increasing the temperatures readings in many areas. However, I do not agree that a picture of a polar bear taken on an ice flow in August gives a clear indication of global warming.

NASA tells us that the surface of Mars has also increased since they have been monitoring that temperature. This would indicate that only the Sun could be warming the surface of Mars and most certainly having a similar effect on earth.

 

I firmly believe we must do everything possible to protect and maintain a clean environment, however, when we are playing with nature, we should move very slowly and do not do anything that we cannot reverse.

This "Cap and Trade"  bill is just another way for the rich (Read Al Gore) to get richer. 

 

James G. McMorris 

Health Care Public Service Announcement -- It's Time!


This Wednesday, the President will hold a town-hall on Health Care  and the White House is asking for input.  To learn more about how to submit a question, read here.
This is it, boys and girls!  Time to put up or shut up!  Don't hold back!  Gather your thoughts, and give your ideas!

Sect 1: Int'l Integral Telecourse... Sect 2: Help Iranians Keep Using Twitter & Facebook


Sect 1:

There are over 7,000 people in this course internationally and Guest Speakers include people like Ken Wilber, Genpo Roshi, Andrew Cohen, Rabbi Gafni, Sally Kempton, and more.

If you have an interest in integral you can participate in Craig Hamilton's 'The Great Integral Spiritual Awakening' telecourse for free and take part in the conversation, find out more here.

I used to work for Ken so I know some of these folks and I think the discussions will be interesting if you are into this sort of thing.  The course is recorded so you can listen to the call any time you cannot listen live. 

If you have no idea what Integral is you can visit www.integrallife.com or www.integralinstitute.org and get some info. 

 Sect 2:  SOMETHING YOU CAN DO TO HELP IRANIANS USE TWITTER & FACEBOOK

This comment was posted a few days ago:

An iranian guest wrote
at 7:57am on June 23rd, 2009

PLEASE READ: the Iranian Government is now tracking Twitter and Facebook in Iran. Everyone please go to your setting and please change the location and network to IRAN so the government will have a hard time tracking the facebookers and tweeters...this will prevent them from shutting down twitter and facebook....This is one of our few sources of media in Iran...Please pass this on.....Thank you!  

I didn't realize we can do this but you can change your network location to Iran.  I did this on my Facebook account.  It is a small thing but easily done:)  I have yet to figure out how to do this on Twitter. If anyone knows, please comment.  Thanks!

Also ProfB turned us on to this site where you can get green solidarity T-Shirts: http://www.afreeiran.com/


 *Update* So far it seems with Twitter you can only state your location as Iran. I have not found a way to make Iran the Network in Twitter.*

 

Dadaism: The Answer to Republicanism


Jean Arp, where are you when we need you most?

Joe the plumber shows up again this week. But he's still a star in conservative circles -- and still saying some odd, hostile things. At an event Thursday for the Wisconsin chapter of Americans for Prosperity (one of the lead organizations behind the Tax Day Tea Parties), Wurzelbacher suggested Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) should be lynched.

"I'm here for one reason and one reason only: It's 'I love America,'" Wurzelbacher told the crowd. "Mainstream media wants to paint us as a bunch of extremists, right? We're in search of liberty and our freedoms. What's so extreme about that?" [...]

"Let me give you another extremist view, 'In God We Trust,'" he said to wild applause. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/26/joe-the-plumber-suggests_n_221631.html

Michelle Bachmann now has won her own comic book. She will never shut up. She insists she will refuse to fill out a census form for 2010. Paraphrasing Nixon I guess she actually said "I'm not a kook" She went on an on about how the Census is run by the likes of Acorn.

On Fox News this morning, Bachmann repeated her determination to break the law. She also suggested that the Obama administration could use the Census data for nefarious purposes -- including the imprisonment of Americans in concentration camps:

BACHMANN: If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the census bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations, at the request of President Roosevelt, and that's how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps. I'm not saying that's what the Administration is planning to do. But I am saying that private, personal information that was given to the census bureau in the 1940s was used against Americans to round them http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/25/bachmann-fox-census/

On Saturday, Pat Buchanan hosted a conference to discuss how Republicans can regain a majority in America. During one discussion, panelists suggested supporting English-only initiatives as a prime way of attracting "working class white Democrats." The discussion ridiculed Judge Sotomayor for the fact that she studied children's classics to improve her grammar while attending college. The panelists also suggested that, without English as the official language, President Obama would force Americans to speak Spanish. http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/22/misspelled-english-buchanan/

s. The word conference was spelled "Conferenece." View it here:

Pat Buchanan and Peter Brimelow



Media Matters has rush blaming Obama for the Sanford affair. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906260037

 

MM also has Beck demonstrating that cap and trade is like a watermelon, green on the outside and red on the inside and therefore a communist plot. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906260032

But that was not good enough so:

MM included Beck's rant on "some" cap and trade supporters: "dumbest people" to walk Earth, "greedy," "wicked," "treasonous" http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906260020

 Oh and as far as Savage, just follow Bill Bowman, he has that under control here at TPM and on his own web site. http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/wfb812/

Oh and the guy who burned down the barn, killed the neighbor's dog and ran over the sheriff, Stratofrog has w all documented without any help from me. http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/stratofrog/2009/06/widdledub-engages-in-thinkery.php

Keith O had it in for some state senator all week who was giving speeches about how important it was to refrain from giving free lunches to poor kids during the summer because hunger could be a great inspiration to change your station in life.

DADAISM

According to Wiki:

Dada or Dadaism is a cultural movement that began in Zürich, Switzerland, during World War I and peaked from 1916 to 1922.[1] The movement primarily involved visual arts, literature--poetry, art manifestoes, art theory--theatre, and graphic design, and concentrated its anti-war politics through a rejection of the prevailing standards in art through anti-art cultural works.

At the first public soiree at the cabaret on July 14, 1916, Ball recited the first manifesto (see text). Tzara, in 1918, wrote a Dada manifesto considered one of the most important of the Dada writings. Other manifestos followed.

Marcel Janco recalled,

We had lost confidence in our culture. Everything had to be demolished. We would begin again after the "tabula rasa". At the Cabaret Voltaire we began by shocking common sense, public opinion, education, institutions, museums, good taste, in short, the whole prevailing order.

Jean Arp was one of those courageous leaders of this movement. He told a story about his experience with the draft for WW1:

Arp later told the story of how, when he was notified to report to the German embassy, he avoided being drafted into the army: he took the paperwork he had been given and, in the first blank, wrote the date. He then wrote the date in every other space as well, then drew a line beneath them and carefully added them up. He then took off all his clothes and went to hand in his paperwork. He was told to go home.

I related another story about Arp and a publisher. I cannot confirm it right now but the story goes that he was supposed to write a book. So in order to comply with the contract he wrote two hundred and some pages. Each page ended with a period. He then SHUFFLED the pages like a deck of cards and handed the tome in to the publisher.

Now, what has all this to do with the cost of gasoline and health care in this country?

Well first, Main Stream Media would have you think that the repubs are in 'DISARRAY'.  That they need to find a SPOKESMAN for their party. (I love this, spokesman, what a bunch of idiots)

That somehow something has changed.

I watched the 'SPOKESPEOPLE' for the repubs give out the same Dadaistic crap for eight goddamnable years. (blesses himself) Nothing has changed. They just are not in power anymore. They never once came out and spoke any truth. They never once came out and communicated logical reasons for their actions. They even lied about what their actions were most of the time.

There are weapons of mass destruction.

No there are not.

Just wait, we have not found them yet.

It has been two years and there are no weapons of mass destruction.

Yeah but there is a definite connection between Saddam and 1) the Taliban or 2) Terrorists or 3) Al Qaida or 4) totalitarian communists.

There was a nuclear arms program in Iraq.

No there was not.

We know that there was a link between Iraq and obtaining nuclear 1) bombs or 2) a missile deliver system or 3) aluminum tubes for...4) enriched uranium cheerios.........

No there was not, ever.

Well we wished to make America safe for Democracy.

Cheney, w, rummy, condi, rove, ....just take your pick. They all once did or still do make these claims.

Regulation is strangling this country and loosening regulation will help with the economy and....

Lack of regulation is killing this country you doofus or doofuses or...

We had full employment and good numbers for 46 months or 48 months or whatever.

What about the rest of the term, what about the last year of your administration? What about the worst economy in 75 - 80 years? What about the mire you left all of us in as far as wars in the Middle East? What about........

You see, this is all a waste of time and energy. At least when the third grader says my dog ate my homework, I mean, he could be right. Make a call, does the kid have a dog and does the dog like to eat paper?  I dunno.

We, the left, the Dems, the Progressives, the Educated.....we are doing this all wrong. We are responding incorrectly to this drivel. We cannot change the arena for discussion. MSM will continue to let cheney or w or rove or whoever get on tv and say this drivel. They are interested in ratings and money and advertisers who are all repubs anyway.

So we need an Arp out there or a Janco or even a Quinn to respond properly. For me the Q & A might go like this:

Cheney:  We have not had any further attacks on this country since 9/11 because of policies we instituted in our administration...blah blah blah blah

Arp:  Mr. Dick sir, you and yours have made the Muslim terrorists stronger and stronger and I would personally like to thank you for that since it means that my company, MISSILES GALORE will make more money than any two third world countries now in existence. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Bachmann:  This country is drifting, nay falling into communism faster and faster every day. The government has too much power over individual lives....blah blah blah

Janco:  I really wish to thank you, whatever the fu.. your name is for giving our side the opportunity to confront this woman about certain statements she has made recently.  But my God, here she is filling her pants again and I told you before michelle, my belle, you have to put the depends on first and then your pants suit. My god, the smell in here.

Beck:  Family values are the values that make families and families that make the values that we value at all times and if the homos have their way with themselves and then, naturally with me because I will be defenseless......

Quinn:  thank you for that mr. glenn and just for this purpose I have brought along a recording from Queen (my favorite cut used in Highlander) and here it is (pulls out a miniature recorder) and now let us all sing along:

Too late, my time has come
Sends shivers down my spine
Body's aching all the time
Goodbye everybody - I've got to go
Gotta leave you all behind and face the truth
Mama, ooo - (anyway the wind blows)
I don't want to die
I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all

I see a little silhouetto of a man
Scaramouch, scaramouch will you do the fandango
Thunderbolt and lightning - very very frightening me
Gallileo, Gallileo,
Gallileo, Gallileo,
Gallileo Figaro - magnifico

But I'm just a poor boy and nobody loves me
He's just a poor boy from a poor family
Spare him his life from this monstrosity
Easy come easy go - will you let me go
Bismillah! No - we will not let you go - let him go
Bismillah! We will not let you go - let him go
Bismillah! We will not let you go - let me go
Will not let you go - let me go (never)
Never let you go - let me go
Never let me go - ooo
No, no, no, no, no, no, no -
Oh mama mia, mama mia, mama mia let me go
Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me
for me
for me

 

Rush:  I really believe that the sins of the republicans of late are directly tied to the realization that the socialist dems have taken over the government in a bloodless coupe and that THEY WILL DO ANYTHING TO RETAIN POWER and that they will stop at nothing to level the playing field and redistribute wealth.....

Dickon: If I had a hammer (and a sickle) I'd hammer in the morning (an sickle too) I'd hammer in the evening all over this land. I'd hammer out danger, I'd hammer out a warnin', I'd hammer out the love between my brother and my sister (and be sickling too) all over this land.

Rummy: We now know some things we did not know but at the same time we still do not know what we did not know, at least to some extent...........

Dester:  We do know that you do not know the difference between making war profitable and making hundreds of millions of dollars on drug stocks......have you taken your meds today? I mean seriously, a man of your age and with obvious behavioral issues should be under the care and guidance of a group of mental health care providers.....

Palin:  You know we do not even have taxes in Alaska. I was just reading one of those New York Elite papers and it was sayin that only through more taxes can you be happy. Well I disagree with that, I mean less taxes is better and no taxes is even better. You know someone said that everytime you lower taxes the government makes more money. Think of how much money this country would have if we just ended all federal taxes forever. You betcha

Little Eva: Well Mrs. Governess, Do you not see, Everybody's doin a brand new dance. I know you will like it if you give it a chance. Do the locomotion with me-- come on baby jump up, jump back well I think you have the knack.  Move around the floor in a locomotion. Do it holding hands if you do get the notion. It even makes you happy when you're feelin blue. Oooh you're lookin good.

Michael Jackson


That was beautifully said. There is an ignorance about Michael Jackson in contemporary America that bears no relationship to the impact that this human being had upon the world. Watching MSNBC's Keith Olbermann and Vanity Fair's Maureen Orth simply categorize Jackson as a weird demented icon was heart wrenching. They destroyed my image of a passionate and empathetic news station  and cruelly reminded me of FOX's discriminatory coverage of O.J. Simpson. This deja vu constantly reminds black people that in the eyes of white liberals we are a guilty headline to be exploited by the CEO's of corporate advertisers. MSNBC's coverage was not an honorable memorial, but a lynching party with a Vanity editor tying the hangman's noose by the dim light of hyperbole from seasoned newscasters.  

You're right, meaningful liberals are all too eager to march to the distant sounds of apathy because they can step over the pig manure they historically permeated in their own back yard. Thanks for being you. http://www.thedailybeast.com/

Electric car sharing in Baltimore


Various outlets quote this AP story: All-electric car-sharing debuts in Baltimore

"The nation's first all-electric car-sharing program debuted Tuesday at the city's Inner Harbor, with manufacturer Electrovaya hoping urban residents seeking to go green and curious tourists will take the concept for a spin."

I did just that. On my way to the City Sands competition at Baltimore's Inner Harbor, I joined a few other onlookers around the three tiny green Maya 300s parked in front of the Maryland Science Center. Oddly enough, AltCar's staff posted their display boards on an open cab GEM, a familiar low speed, neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) used by city staff and security around Inner Harbor, by the postal service elsewhere in the city and even as taxis in good weather.

Both Electrovaya and ExxonMobil logos were on display, but there was little to indicate that the body is imported from Changan Automobile Group of China, where it is sold with a gasoline engine as the BenBen. Electrovaya makes the electric drivetrain and assembles the car in Mississauga, Ontario while ExxonMobil manufactures the separator film between anode and cathode in the lithium-ion batteries. Green Car Congress is great for battery talk:

"The advanced performance separators exhibit enhanced permeability, higher meltdown temperature and melt integrity without compromising the shutdown temperature and mechanical strength. The higher meltdown temperature significantly increases the film's thermal safety margin."

AP continues:

"Electrovaya Inc. is offering its Maya 300 for rent at the Maryland Science Center. The car can go up to 120 miles on one charge of its lithium-ion battery system, and it gets its juice from a regular 110-volt outlet."

But, EV range claims always bear clarification. The Maya 300 can probably travel 120 miles at 30-40 mph under good road conditions. The staffer told us that driving at highway speeds would probably lower that range to 80 miles, and that ordinary recharging will take 6 hours. (He also mentioned they were still waiting for DOT approval to drive at higher speeds than NEVs.) Also, cold weather always reduces battery performance. There is also the issue of proper charging to maintain battery lifespan, which I suspect will cost early adopters a lot of money:

"The lifespan of a deep cycle battery will vary considerably with how it is used, how it is maintained and charged, temperature, and other factors. In extreme cases, it can vary to extremes - we have seen L-16's killed in less than a year by severe overcharging, ... We have seen gelled cells destroyed in one day when overcharged with a large automotive charger. We have seen golf cart batteries destroyed without ever being used in less than a year because they were left sitting in a hot garage without being charged."

Anyway, I signed a release and drove the Maya around the block. It was easy to start, the gearing was Forward - Neutral - Reverse, and it was very quiet - just a low whine on acceleration. But the very small tires made for bumpy handling over the ordinary manholes and irregularities of Key Highway. I'd be afraid to take the Maya across Pulaski Highway's terrible potholes, or at higher speeds on the beltway.

The interior was spartan, with controls centered to allow both left and right-hand steering wheel placement. The rear seats fold down to provide enough cargo space for moving a futon, perhaps, but probably not a futon frame.

AltCar Standard $0.00/mo $9.00/hr $72.00/day

AltCar Preferred $25.00/mo $7.50/hr $60.00/day (three free hours per month)

ZipCar Week $50.00/yr $8.00/hr $66.00/day

ZipCar Weekend $50.00/yr $9.00/hr $72.00/day

I could see renting the Maya 300 as a more commodious alternative to riding a bike or scooter, but their pricing structure is only competitive for car sharing. ZipCar is slightly less expensive but has only a handful of cars around Johns Hopkins, while Enterprise will rent an economy car for perhaps $45/day.

Can Bill Clinton save Haiti?


Well the answer is obvious.  It's Bill Clinton.  Though he has been out of office for almost a decade the man is still a powerhouse on the Global scene.  That he has taken on the special envoy position with the U.N., especially considering his less than pleasant encounters with Haitian restoration during his Presidency speaks to Clinton's commitment.  I'd wager he feels a sense of responsibility toward the situation in Haiti beginning with U.S. policy in the 1990's and has been itching to take a crack at the problems that have spawned from that time.  With that much commitment and all the Clinton clout (around the world with donors in particular) it would seem a great opportunity is available to bring some meaningful change and development for the people of a country ravaged by poverty, lawlessness and corruption not to mention the devastating effects of natural disasters in recent years.  Furthermore, avoiding any puns, the timing could not be better for Clinton to get involved.  Big money has just been pledged in aid for Haiti from the U.S. and the upcoming elections there are wide open with some visionaries running for high offices.  We saw what Bill Clinton was able to do economically for this country against some tough odds with a high rate of success.  He was not able to see his hopes for Haiti achieved at that time but with his new position and the new circumstances I would not be surprised to see peace and prosperity in Haiti's near future.

Widdledub has surfaced


Widdledub has surfaced in "Widdledub Engages in Thinkery."

I am actually quite ticked as Widdledub is trying to distance himself from me because of my recent media appearances. Instead, he goes out there an makes the usual charming fool of himself with some side show comedy routine. I never could get that guy to just shut up. He is clueless that his every quip is a mangled mess, and that now neither I, or Turd Blossom can pull his ass out of the fire, he is all alone.

Who ARE these damn TPMers that they continue to smear our good names and records?

DICK CHENEY. RELEASE THE REAL BARAK OBAMA NOW!!!!


Ok you sadistic sick bastard. We are on to you. Enough is enough. So it appears maybe the rumor you kidnapped the real Barak Obama and replaced him with an imposter puppet is true. Yea yea yea. Very funny. But the gig is up. It's just a little obvious this is NOT the real Barak Obama. No way. Not the one we elected and of course, you had him pardon the torturers so you can then turn around and torture the real one...and then say it was "legal" and right now as I speak, you are preparing a pardon for you and Bush that the imposter Obama will sign to pardon your lame ass for the past 8 years. OK WE GET IT. GREAT JOB. VERY FUNNY.

Where is he Mr. Cheney? What country? And what about Michelle? The kids? Are they ok?

Yea. It is a big joke and you have every right to be running around with a smile on your face.

You guys won and you are still winning. You won't go to jail for a damn thing but the jig is up.

Bring back the real Barak Obama and bring him back NOW. 

 

Roots Rot


I followed a link today to the Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) web site. IRE is (in its own words): "...a grassroots nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the quality of investigative reporting."

 Who should be featured in an article about Accountability Reporting and Digging Deep? None other than Leonard Downie, Jr,  Executive Editor of the wapo until September 2008, and Bob Woodward. The irony hit me like a blast of hot desert air and almost took my breath away, or possibly just made me snort.  Here sat these two do-nothings on an Accountability  Reporting discussion panel while the best Accountability journalist at the wapo had just been fired.

Woodward is still riding on his Watergate laurels of course and says his "aggressiveness" failed him on the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, but neither of these men knows exactly why they didn't dig deeper.  (A little fuzzy logic and a few memos from the bushies is my guess.) 

 Woodward said, "Obviously, when you're going to war you want the evidence to be hard." Had Post reporters gotten together with Downie "to figure out what questions aren't answered," though, the editor "would have said, 'Get on that; let's mobilize.' We failed to mobilize on that."

And what did Downie have to say about it? "Downie responded by citing the complexity of the story judgments that were required to weed out all the inaccurate reports emerging in the days following the terrorist attacks."   TRANSLATION:  If we want to keep those WH memos coming, we'll  have to take the neocons' word for it.

 The Post didn't mobilized on the invasion issue, the torture issue, the warrantless spying issue, or the habeas corpus issue or...hmmm.  Anyone remember what issue they did mobilize on?  Ah, they broke the Walter Reed story, I believe.  But too many of the horrors of the last eight years were, apparently, too *complicated* for the paper to tackle. 

 Downie and Woodward and their fellow journalists are the grassroots of the MSM, they claim. The pillars of the press.  The defenders of freedom. But there seems to be trouble brewing in rootsville.  Downie says "We're not talking about the survival of newspapers; we're talking about the survival of news."   

 Downie, who appears to be a drama queen in addition to defender,  is hardly in a position to help the American press save itself since he and his former colleagues  at the wapo and elsewhere are part of the problem.  Frankly, I would call it roots rot.  They're looking everywhere in their root cellar for a cure when it can only be found by dragging their own actions out into the sunlight for some serious scrutiny.  Firing one of their critics is just digging a deeper hole for themselves, not "digging deep"  for the news.

What I Want in Healthcare Reform


I don't know about you, but I am pulling my hair out at the absolute insanity in the politics of the healthcare "debate." I want a 'single payer" system that provides UNIVERSAL healthcare. I do not want a system that tweeks the edges so cover a FEW more people. As I see it there are three components to the healthcare issue:

1. Healthcare is not accessible to a growing portion of the population.
2. Healthcare in the United States is the most expensive in the world.
3. Costs (and profits) are out of control.

Read more »

On Terror, Barack Channels W


With policies like these, they might as well just keep Guantanamo open.

As TPM is reporting, Obama has once again mimicked the Bush administration on its "War on Terror" policy.  He's now issued an order legalizing the indefinite incarceration of terrorism suspects.

This is exactly what we didn't want.

This is exactly what we were promised would be over following the closing of Guantanamo.

We were led to believe that the closure of Gitmo meant an end to the suspension of habeus corpus, to the crimes of the Military Commissions Act, to throwing people in jail for life without charging them with a thing.

And in a politically expedient move (questionable, considering how much this will anger liberals), the Obama administration has assured us that even if Guantanamo is closed, we can still sit on detainees for eternity, even if we don't know what they've done.  Even if waterboarding them dozens of times yields no critical, or accurate, information.

Perhaps Obama is trying to appease the NIMBY's-- that's Not In My BackYard: the rallying cry for Republicans who caution that putting an end to the abuse and lawlessness at Guantanamo would precipitate an influx of actual terrorists menacingly licking their lips in state prisons across the country, plotting their next attack.  Evil Muslims-- coming to a correctional institute near you!

I say YIMBY.  Yes in my backyard.  Please.  Why not?  Most of these guys, like the adorable uighurs who've been lounging in Bermuda following their release, are pretty harmless, anyway.  We know that a lot of the prisoners accumulated at Gitmo were simply swept up in the Bush White House's racist, post-9/11 fervor.  They were victims of 'wrong place, wrong time syndrome,' people like Moazzam Begg, author of "Enemy Combatant," who happened to have been in a Muslim country when U.S. forces were less than discriminate in determining what a terrorist was.

What's so insidious about this decree is that it purports to support his larger effort to close Gitmo.  Sure, Republicans will be less squeamish if you say that yes, we will shut it down, but we can also still keep doing the same thing to these prisoners until the end of time.  Don't worry, they won't be released into the actual justice system, or even to a military justice system that's remotely fair (see the testimony of former military officers who have spoken out about the lack of fairness in the military court system, especially for so-called 'enemy combatants.'  Military brass apparently advocated convictions no matter what the cost.)

Of course, closing Guantanamo is pointless if they rubber stamp the continued execution of the Cuban prison's biggest sin: the unconstitutional detainment of these people.

Yes in my backyard, Obama.  In my backyard, people are treated equally under the law.  So whether or not someone once trained to be a suicide bomber, or they had lunch with Khalid Sheik Mohammad, or they were simply a British person of Middle Eastern descent who had the misfortune to be captured by American forces, they still deserve a fair trial.

Unitarianism, Jefferson and Deism - from Monticello.org


A six part video series published at the YouTube Account of The Thomas Jefferson Foundation: Monticello.org. the videos run from 1:33 to 6:33 in length, and are about 4 minutes average.. From the Monticello.org Description:

On June 21, 2005, David Holmes, Professor of Religion at The College of William and Mary, listed out key points of Jefferson's religious beliefs and practices and offered an answer to the oft-asked question of whether the Author of the Declaration of American Independence might have been a Unitarian.

Read more »

Popular Music and Being Jewish


There are so many things to write about this week, how government that is not responsive to the people it serves is not only useless, but destructive (that means you Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi---the public wants national health care insurance, even if campaign contributors don't) and newspaper and television people who believe that every opinion, no matter how daft, is entitled to equal weight, but it has been decided that this is the wek that we become obsessed with popular music. I don't want to be a stick in the mud even though the person "the world is mourning" (as the New York Times website proclaimed for a few hours Friday until somebody realized that it did not) is not anyone whose music, dancing, or other things were never of interest to me.

So what does this have to do with being Jewish as my current headline announces? Stick with me for a second or two, below the fold,  and see if I can keep you interested.

Read more »

PLEASE! I TRULY do NEED your help b4 June 30th!! Just take a look . (Please REC this post, normally I wouldn't ask but this SHIT is serious)


This is something I REALLY need your help with, Because the FDA is considering a complete ban on certain medications used in the treatment of chronic pain. If this new regulation goes through it is going to cause a lot of people a lot of pain. Somebody (can't figure out exactly who) is asking the FDA to ban most of the more potent pain relievers currently available by prescription, and it appears this new regulation will be enacted UNLESS a lot more "opposed" letters are received. That's what I am asking you to do, oppose this proposed new regulation. Also, the rumour is that ADD/ADHD medications are next on the "hit" list along with certain cancer medications and then certain psychiatric meds.

 

Link to the American Pain Foundation site =====> HERE

Feel free to copy my "comment" below and change a few details if you want, even a direct copy is OK too. I'd actually like you to write your own but either way is fine with me. You don't need to put your name on it and even at the comment site (I'll list it below) it only requires a first name, and Organization  (for the "organization" you can use the American Pain Foundation) In the comment section you MUST include the Docket number which is at the top of my comment that  I pasted below.  

PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT ===> HERE  

Again, you don't need to include your last name on the form to submit your comment and you don't have to put your name at the end of this letter, I did, but it is not required. Oh.. if you are going to post a long comment at the above site type it up first and copy and paste it because the site will time out. 

 

THANKS TO ALL THAT TAKE THE TIME TO HELP I WILL BE IN YOUR DEBT FOR A VERY LONG TIME!    

Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0143 As someone that has had to deal with chronic pain for the past 13 years I want to urge you not to take any action that would limit the ability of my doctor to treat the constant pain I experience 24 HOURS A DAY. I have not been able to sleep more than 3 hours at a stretch for more than 11 years now and to limit the choices my doctor and I have to treat this constant and NEVER ENDING pain would be draconian and cruel.
I am already forced to pay something I call "The Pain Tax" because my doctor is not permitted to put refills on one of my medications. This policy, (it is not a law) requires me to see my doctor, at a minimum, EVERY MONTH which requires me to pay for at least 8 extra doctor visits every year.
Rather than clamping down and causing HARM to MILLIONS OF AMERICANS, I urge you to relax whatever regulation it is that forces those who suffer the most, to pay the most, when it comes to receiving effective care. That banning certain medications is even being considered is cruel and unusual to pain patients.
I feel that you and "other" regulatory agencies should trust the American citizen and their doctor enough to know what is best, and to make the best decisions about their individual care.
There appears to be a very "vocal MINORITY" that feels they MUST protect everyone else regardless of the hardship it burdens EVERY other citizen with, and to act at the urging of these vocal minorities is to kick to the side of the road THE TRUE EXPERTS THAT ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT WORKS BEST FOR THEM. Again, I urge you to not only ignore this call from the "hysterical" and take NO ACTION, to limit a doctor's and patient's choice to decide the best treatment for that individual.
IN ADDITION I would ask that you pass a regulation that says the following:
     "Doctors SHALL be permitted to include refills on prescriptions, regardless of            the type of medication prescribed"
This simple change will save individuals and their insurance companies Billions of dollars while at the same time save Medicare and Medicaid even more. Please don't limit the choices of doctors and patients just because a vocal minority has decided that certain medications are "bad"!
And, if I am unable to convince you to relax the "refill regulation", then please take comfort in the fact that doctors are currently being effectively intimidated, by certain agencies, in the decisions they make while treating pain, and also, you can take comfort in the fact that a tremendous burden is in place for those that suffer, and take no action on this ill informed proposal to ban certain pain relieving medications.
Very, Very, VERY Sincerely,    

Please post a note if you submit a comment, or even if you think I'm a complete idiot, I don't care if you take the time to send in a comment, hell I'll even agree with you until July 1st. I will also be reposting this or trying to keep it in the "Recommended Reader Posts" area. Any help with that will be greatly appreciated. If you want to copy this ENTIRE post to put up some place else feel free. And again PLEASE RECOMMEND this post!

One more thing if you have the time PLEASE send a copy to advocacy@painfoundation.org  

Thanks!

 FACE  (an angry Ò¿Ó about this bullshit issue)

Michael Jackson is the New Elvis


Anyone old enough to remember when Elvis died will also remember the small industry that began shortly afterward.  You could buy Elvis Commemorative Plates.  Late night commercials sold compilation records and tapes of his greatest hits (only $19.99 plus shipping and handling, delivery in 6-8 weeks, NO COD).  Graceland opened and became a theme park/shrine/cemetery.  Elvis Inc. became big business.  The King of Dead Celebrities.

The King is dead, long live the King's Image.  And now we will see it all over again, but updated for the 21st century.  There will be a Michael Jackson channel on SIRIUS.  iTunes will have special deals on MJ MP3's.  Oprah will have entire shows dedicated to Michael Jackson's housekeeper.  There will be books!  And just wait until they open up Neverland Ranch to tourists (they already have rides!).  You will be able to walk through MJ's version of The Jungle Room.  For an extra five dollars you can tour the bedroom.

And people will pay!  We all love a good freak-show.  It will be a like driving by major car wreck on the freeway -- but frozen in time so the viewer can linger.  The post-respiratory phase of Michael Jackson's career has now begun.

Inspection- In Response to Dull-witted Applications of Ockham's Razor




   To provide my own dull wit to a word, why is it whenever I hear "Ockham," I want to say "bless you?"


   From answers.com...

Ockham's Razor: (Note: apparently, according to Answers, both "Occam" and "Ockham" work. I had always spelled it "Occam," and found out after I had changed it to "Ockham" my correction fetish doesn't always serve me well when editing.)

A rule in science and philosophy stating that entities should not be multiplied needlessly. This rule is interpreted to mean that the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable and that an explanation for unknown phenomena should first be attempted in terms of what is already known. Also called law of parsimony.

   I am here, typing this now, to argue with a certain interpretation of the Razor, and maybe even whether it is true at all. How many times have you heard "Occam's Razor proves?" Occam's Razor proves nothing. It suggests. I even argue with that suggestion.

   I suppose it boils down to this question... how many real simple answers are there?

   Occam's Razor is often used for 9/11.

   Observe this post of mine at Volconvo, a debate site, responding to how according to one poster the official story regarding 9/11 is more simple; therefore win in a Razor-off ...

Re: Occam's Razor

Let's see...

Somehow all these bin Laden supporters either didn't squeal or not loud enough to be heard or believed...

They managed to get through what security there was at the time and even have, as devote Muslims of the fundamentalistic kind, a wild party the night before that still didn't raise enough suspicions.

Managed to take over planes with no more than box cutters.

Three out of four succeeded to fly unchallenged into the towers, not even much of an attempt... if any... to stop them. And the one that didn't make it only failed because of passengers. I would assume it would have hit without challenge too: unless someone can prove the shot down theory; the same theory that many consider also to be nutso. (I don't. It actually makes some sense if we are to consider Razor applicable at all.)

Did anyone ever disprove that the terrorist IDs were found, undamaged, scattered over the ruins? How "Razor" is that?

I'm sorry but Ockham's Razor doesn't apply here... no matter which way we spin it. That's the problem with Ockham's Razor. Complex things do happen, and simply because it's the most simple explanation doesn't necessarily mean it's the right one. It's simply the easiest one to sell. Because a good portion of the public is dull-witted enough to believe Ockham's Razor is a proven construct: gospel. It's an interesting guideline. That's all.

Example: before we knew as much as we did and had the tools to measure, wouldn't Ockham's Razor dictate the sun moved around the Earth at one point in our history, or earlier that the Earth was flat? What we know is always limited by what we see, what we know how to test and our intellectual development. Atoms? Molecules? Electrons? Oh, common, it's simply just God particles created during that Adam and Eve "poof" moment!

   Back to 9/11...

   Not to mention getting the terrorists here, training them all those years before, and after, they got here... including indoctrination. Positioning them. Flying lessons.

   No matter what scenario we choose to believe regarding 9/11, there's an inherent complexity... unless you wish to believe God did it. Poof! Even Satan doing it would require a lot of God doing squat and Satan plotting, planning, sending these lost souls to do his work that complicates it all. With God doing it, well... he was teaching us a lesson. All are guilty, all are sinners...

   Ah, blessed simplicity! Just like the sun revolving around the Earth, at least until we get a little more complex in our observations.

   If we are to believe Ockham as it is commonly interpreted the the simplest answer must be right. "God did it." Poof!

   Let's bring it down to basics. "A butterfly flies because it has wings." Very Ockham's Razor-ish. But a butterfly doesn't fly because it has wings, otherwise chickens would fly too. There's so much involved including genetics, the development of this creature through evolution, how they have been kept or not in captivity, physics in regard to flying... or not, aerodynamics, atmosphere as it exists here vs. other environments. (Otherwise a butterfly should be able to fly in space or near the ocean floor.)

   That's the short, but still complex, list.

   Once you look into anything, simplicity slips away and the true complexity of life, death and reality take hold.

   Occam's Razor has its uses. Once a theory becomes needlessly complex it helps guide us towards what might be a better solution... until we learn more. But that's all. It is not "proof" of anything, and it is a weak guideline at best. The overly complex may still be the right path to take. One of the best applications of this dull version of Razor might be the old concept that every element, every facet of reality and what we see, hear, feel and taste, is controlled by one deity. Not even just one God. One deity each. Otherwise we add to the complexity that one deity would have to have. An all powerful, all knowing, eternal God would indeed be a quite complex being.

   No complexity to how gravity works, no black holes, no naturally occurring hurricanes, tornadoes and all the laws of physics and such that apply...

   All the "poof" work of one deity each.

   Of course where all these deities reside... that might be a bit too complex for some who push Occam's Razor.

   Life is complex.

   Reality is complex.

   Those who claim simplicity often understate the complexity of what they support, and these same "understaters" usually only point out the complexity when it comes to what they disagree with.

   It's that simple.

   Or is it?

  (Chuckle.)



                                                         -30-

   Inspection is a column that has been written by Ken Carman for over 30 years. Inspection is dedicated to looking at odd angles, under all the rocks and into the unseen cracks and crevasses that constitute the issues and philosophical constructs of our day: places few think, or even dare, to venture.

© Copyright 2009
Ken Carman and Cartenual Productions
All Rights Reserved

Let him go quietly.


The death of Michael Jackson is tragic.  So many stories of his life are tragic.  What is beautiful is the music and the timeless universal cross-cultural appeal of the brilliant entertainer.  
They say he was a tortured soul.  
Because of that, I ask:  
Must his death be a major production?  A frenzy of controversy?  Must we re-adjudicate his sordid past?  Must the media play over and over again the speculation about his sexuality, his cosmetic surgeries, his bankruptcy, his family difficulties?  Do we have to televise the people around him who will be fighting for his remains?  His money?  His child?  
Must we hear about the seagulls descending to collect every shred of what he's left behind?
Can the media give his soul the peace in death they couldn't offer it in life?

 

No indefinite detention


No President should retain for him/her self the right to detain people indefinitely - not if your last name is Lincoln, Bush, or Obama.  At some point, due process must come into play.  Otherwise, we are all at risk of becoming the one who is so detained.

The Republicans Have Figured Out What To Do About Their Scandalous Behavior!


Seriously, folks, there is a real discussion going on in the Party of Family Values about what they need to do about all these pols among them who just can't behave.  Are they going to have prayer meetings to help their flocks realize the error of their ways?  No.   Are they going to get strict, and kick people out of office when they behave like randy school-boys?  No.  Are they going to do some soul-searching and try to be better?  No.  They are going to change the subject because all that "family values stuff" is coming back to bite them in their collective butts.
Some musings:

...by resorting to that kind of moral values rhetoric," said Mike Maslansky, CEO of Luntz Maslansky, a predominantly conservative communications firm. "I don't say rhetoric as a means of demeaning it. Talking in those terms is a way to appeal to the base. In an election season they find it is a significant advantage to talk in those terms. Maybe for the other three years out of their term they wish that they hadn't."

The GOP, to be certain, will never get to a point where it willfully cedes the moral high ground to Democrats. The social and religious conservatives who comprise a large and vocal portion of the base won't permit such a drift.
"Look, of course, we are the conservative party and we are going to have a conservative message," said Donatelli. "But I do think by talking a little bit more about economic opportunity that we as a party want to offer both at the national and state level, that is what we can do I think to broaden our ranks."
Could it be that they finally have reached the capacity to feel shame?  No.  I think it is just that they realize they might get called on it.

"Ruth Madoff forfeits assets, left with $2.5 million" WHAT??


From Reuters 6/26/09:

"Ruth Madoff forfeits assets, left with $2.5 million"

 http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55Q0BF20090627

 WHAT???

"Court documents filed on Friday night showed Ruth Madoff, 68, who has said nothing in public about her husband's crimes in the six months since his arrest, would be left with $2.5 million in cash."

Our DOJ prosecutors are as corrupt and useless as the SEC, our Congress people, Dodd, Shumer et al.?

Now of course Ruth Madoff should receive a fair trial, but she was the bookkeeper for Bernie from the start. There is strong evidence her father was in on the Madoff frauds from way back when.

So what part of her inheritance from her father and "her" money is not traceable right back to Bernie's crimes?

So where are the indictments against the brother, sons, nieces and Ruth?

In a related article it was reported the Madoff's relinquished claims to loans... does that mean the millions "loaned" to Mark, Andrew and Peter for property purchases are not viewed as payola in the scheme?

"The Madoffs will also lose their interest in "tens of millions of dollars" in loans they had made to family, employees and friends."

Read this completely misleading CNN title:

"Madoff reduced to nothing"

http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/26/news/economy/madoff_sentence/?postversion=2009062622

Ruth's $2.5 million ain't nothing you morons at CNN...

Add the useless Corporate News media to the list.

Prosecutors have a lot of explaining to do. Our federal government teeters on the edge of both financial and moral/legal bankruptcy.

20 years ago, within a year of Michael Milken's junk bond fraud implosion, he faced a 98 count felony indictment.

Wall St. has perpetrated fraud on an exponentially larger scale and we see NO INDICTMENTS of the MBS junk bond crowd. Not one. In fact the opposite. Wall Street received the greatest asset shift from the US tax payer in human history as a reward for their crimes courtesy of our elected representatives.

Can any one say "Regulatory Capture" ?

These issues are not unrelated. It has taken the Fed 20 years to become completely corrupt and ineffective in law enforcement against the "HAVES" as opposed to the have nots... yet we the latter pick up the tab.

 

Widdledub Engages in Thinkery: The Legacy Speech


EERIE, Pa. Recently reclusing and reproofing his forthcoming storybook at a library in Texas, Widdledub finally broke his silence on Oh-Balm-Ah, speaking to $1500 dollar tables at The Manufacturit & Busyness Association's 104th Annual Wingnutteroo. Breathing in the parrhasia and breathing out his displeasia he took to the stage benighted and feckless with a large helping of arcane verbal tendencies. Widdle began by serving up enigmatic drift and wooly treasons for his "Eight Year Reign of Error:"

 Kakourgos, Onourtourbus, Yurwithus, Yuraginus, he poured forthwith into the faux microphoney.

 Notorious for his derivative sneers tilted to common people but also skewed to the vanishing middle class, Widdledub refused to reference by name (but body-languaged) his favorite megalomedia "accidental" shooter, Blunderdick.  Suddenly stumbling deeper into his own financial foibles, he blurted," the verdict is out on socialism." He now seemed hazy about his green paper TARP, which flew by intentional coincidence over America's depleted soils.

"I'll just tell you that there are people at Gitmo that will kill American people at a drop of a hat and I don't believe that persuasion isn't going to work," doubled-negged Widdle. Deep into one side of the face, he decided to stop talking while his numbers continued to fall. He left the odditorium stage as his last applause line linked his self-described "soul" to a lack of citizen popularity and French fries.

Widdledub wished to distance himself from Blunder's recent networked torture confession which had been televised internationally. But regarding his obdurate torture policies he yielded, "The first thing you do is ask what's legal?" and "Therapy isn't going to cause terrorists to change their mind."

One-minded and all, the detainees Widdledub cited had finished their lengthy rehab at the Saudi Sentre for Singing in Unison in 2007. Since enduring Widdle's policy of foreign care and counseling tactics, some of the jihadis had begun anew, their bodies and minds still driven by suffering the Blunderdick's untouchable unterrorgators.

Stepping over Raygun's glove, Widdledub retired to the skene, breaking the rehearsed circularity of the neocon design but making infantile noises under the flying fish arches where the golden public stood in union lines still hoping for Oh-Balm-Ah's uneleven bread.  The new Prez had already flown over for the rescue, but hovered up in the air, nearly becoming a constellation.

Waiting made the people hungrier and feverish, but Iran had run away with a burning news cycle while more US soldiers were invisibly dying next door, and besides, the smoke and mirrors were obscuring their telling visions.

Declassify my mind? Declassify my brine? Declassify my byline? Widdledub chimed, repositioning his cowboy hat for a new song and a dance. He left the fund raising arena after dropping off some co-optation, patronage, and coercion, humming an old Saw-di da'wah, supercilious la-dee-do-dah-day, either zoned-out or jumping the snarks.

 

:::::::::

Un-Finis Parrhasia: (free speech)

in spite of Kakourgos (evil doers)

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/obama-adminis-1.html

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/06/bush-assails-those-who-offer-terrorists-therapy-though-his-administration-sent-detainees-to-saudi-co.html

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/18/bush-takes-swipes-at-policies-of-obama/?page=2

http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/cp97_boucek_saudi_final.pdf

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/socrates/ifstoneinterview.html

http://depthome.brooklyn.cuny.edu/classics/dunkle/studyguide/clouds.htm

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/18/bush-takes-swipes-at-policies-of-obama/

http://antiwar.com/casualties/list.php

Smoke and Mirrors - Distraction from at-HomeTyranny


Weekend Update: This Breaking News Just In...


Michael Jackson is still dead.

And in other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still valiantly holding on in his fight to remain dead.

I am Steevo and you are not.

What's in a name?


As I am nearly finished reading Lawrence Goldstone's Dark Bargain, I started to panic. I started to panic because I didn't have a new book to read.  A few nights ago, when the panic attack was eminent, I was in my bed surfing the internet. While I was on my computer and the Internet, I happen to be listening to a re-broadcast of C-SPAN's After Words wherein Columbia journalism professor John Dinges was interviewing Eduardo Galeno about his book Mirrors: Stories of Almost Everyone. During this interview Mr. Galeno read some of the vignettes written in Mirrors. I was very satisfied with the stories he told about his work and the stories he read. I was so satisfied that I memory-marked Mr. Galeno's book in my mind. After listening to this interview I turned the television off because it had become tedious; it was as tedious as sitting in front of the television like a zombie which is becoming less and less a bad habit of mine. So I shut down my computer, walked into the other room, shut off the television and returned to my room, jumped back in bed and I picked up Dark Bargain to finish the last few pages. The panic of not having something new to read was so strong that I only read a couple more pages.  This usually happens when I really enjoy a book that I am reading.  I remember after reading Beloved by Toni Morrison a few years ago, I had this panic problem while attempting to find a book that was as thought provoking and poetic until I came across Gabriel Garcia Marquez's One Hundred Years of Solitude

Another reason I memory-marked Mirrors by Mr. Galeno  book resides in the fact that Mr. Dinges compared the author to Marquez and his work to Solitude.

A day or so  passed and I made it to the bookstore to purchase Mirrors and Toni Morrison's, A Mercy. I am free of panic and free to finish Dark Bargain. I only have two pages left.  I really enjoyed Mr. Goldstone's work because it pulls back the thick layers of American history and exposes the rawest of raw nerves in United States history: slavery. He does a good job of placing all the actors in the drama on stage in Philadelphia during the re-writing of Articles of Confederation.  He plays no favorites in identifying where and how the "bargain" was struck between Northern and Southern states as they decided to form a union. The bargain is enshired in this country's most serious document. The manner in which Mr. Goldstone lays out the drama highlights the sectional rivalries that ultimately forecast the run-up to the the war between the states.

I think Dark Bargain is relavent becasue slavery still haunts this country.  The U.S. Senate just passed a "no binding" resolution apologizing for its complicity in the one of the most imfamous trades of them all. If that doesn't illustrate how slavery haunts this country, just check out this story on Rhode Island wanting to change it's name because of what it thinks it says about its (our) past.

Climate Change Legislation - The Hidden Scandal Behind Public Support


President Obama strongly endorsed a bill to curtail greenhouse gas emissions that has just been approved by a narrow margin in the House of Representatives. It would save families money, he claimed, and create new jobs. Many members of the public appeared to agree with the President on the need for the legislation, but why did they support it? Was it the savings or jobs he touted? Or was something else the true driving force behind their position?

 

For reasons that will become obvious, I have not reveaaled the real names of three neighbors I recently interviewed who told me they wanted the climate bill to become law. I believe, however, that they are merely the tip of a much larger iceberg with disturbing implications. Their stories follow:

I interviewed Mrs. S. as she tended her garden at the front of the modest suburban home she shared with her husband and three school-age children. She strongly supported the bill, she said emphatically, because it would save them money.

"How much do you expect to save?", I asked.

"The newspaper says it would be at least $100 a year", she replied.

I asked whether that sum was enough to explain the strength of her support.

"Of course", she insisted. "how can anyone afford to turn up their noses at $100 these days?"

Her husband, who had overheard our conversation from the doorway of the house, accompanied me to the sidewalk.

"Grace tells everyone it's the $100", he said quietly, "but I don't think that's the real reason."

"Her cousin lives in the Arizona", he continued, "and water is in short supply in the Southwest. With the climate warming there, the droughts are going to make it worse every year. People will suffer, the land will stop supporting any farming or even grazing, the economy will go bad..."

He hesitated. "It's not just her cousin", he said, "but everyone else out there who's hurt by droughts."

He then added, "I shouldn't tell you this, but the truth is Grace is not only worried about the droughts here in America. She's heard that the warming is making droughts worse in Africa, and maybe Asia and Australia, and people are starving."

"She's sort of a bleeding heart, that way", he confided, before we shook hands, and I walked on.

I wondered whether Mrs. S. was an anomaly, but my next conversation, with Mr. and Mrs. J., suggested otherwise.

Mr. J. looked to be in his mid to late forties, well built and vigorous with a few gray hairs at the temples.

"We need this bill because of jobs", he told me. "I've got a family to feed, and I can't give them what they need if I'm out there looking for a job instead of working", he announced.

His wife interrupted.

"Ted, what are you talking about?", she exclaimed. "You've run your own bicycle repair business for the past 12 years, and it's going strong. The only way you can lose your job is if you fire yourself."

He started to speak, but she persisted.

 "Didn't you tell me just last week you wanted the bill to pass because the new apprentice you hired has family in Bangladesh, and the floods and hurricane damages are driving them off their land, so they can't farm and can't make a living? You said, 'We've got to do something to put a stop to that - the buck stops with us' - I remember your exact words."

Mr. J didn't answer directly, but it seemed clear he was unhappy with his wife's comments.

"Bangladesh is fine, but if I don't bring home any income, how are you going to pay for the fancy dishes you just bought"?, he demanded, as I left them to visit my third neighbor.

Mr. and Mrs. N. greeted me in the doorway of their home. Mr. N. pointed to a partly constructed stairway at the back of the house.

"That's costing us real money", he complained. "A hundred bucks or two won't pay it all off, but it sure makes it easier to keep our house looking good. Definitely we need that bill to pass."

Mrs. N. glanced at her husband, and I could tell she was not sure whether to speak.

"John", she finally whispered, "Why don't you tell him the real reason you support that bill?"

"What are you talking about?", he asked.

She turned to me.

"A month ago, John was looking at the TV reruns showing Hurricane Katrina, and when he got to the picture of that man explaining how his wife was swept out of his arms by the flood, I saw tears in his eyes. He told me, 'yes, I know we can't blame one hurricane on global warming, but I also know that if we don't stop the warming, we're going to get stronger hurricanes and more people are going to die, and I don't want to have to look at more pictures like that.' He turned off the TV, and after that is when he started telling everyone they should write their Congressman to support the bill."

Mr. N. seemed embarrassed.

"It's worse than that", he explained. "The fellow across the street heard me talking about Katrina, and he asked me if that was more important than my family. He asked if I would still support the bill even if it cost me two hundred dollars instead of saving me a hundred. I told him of course not, but as soon as the words were out of my mouth, I knew it was a lie, and I've been ashamed ever since."

Mrs. N. elaborated. "John told me that he would really like to admit he doesn't care about a few dollars as much as those other people. The problem is, he can't tell people, because what will everybody think? We have to keep up appearances, you know."

This seemed to be a cue for Mr. N. to open up further. "It's true", he conceded. I want to admit I lied to that other person, to get that burden off my mind. I even thought of becoming a Catholic so I could confess to the priest."

"He decided not to", Mrs. N. intervened.

"Why not?", I asked.

"Well", said Mr. N., "I realized that when you confess something, you're supposed to promise never to do it again. And I kept thinking about Katrina and all that, and I said to myself, "What if it happens again? What if someone asks me what's important, and I lie and say it's only the money? I don't know if it's a promise I could keep."

Mrs. N. looked wistful. "It's a problem", she sighed. "John would really want to confess to people, but he's a proud man and he can't."

I told her I understood and that there might be others with similar problems who would be interested in reading about their dilemma. I then asked whether I might quote them. Her face grew hard and determined.

"Don't even think about it", she warned. "If you say one word mentioning our names, I'll deny we ever spoke to you!"

I've honored her wishes. Even the initials I cited are not the real ones.

 

They Were Singing And Dancing Yesterday


They were singing and dancing not only in Los Angeles yesterday, because the world is bigger than just Los Angeles.

They were singing and dancing in New York. They were singing and dancing in Detroit. They were dancing and singing in London. They were dancing and singing in Tokyo. They were singing and dancing most likely in Gary, indiana.

People were dancing and singing everywhere.

They were quiet, melancholy, in shock the whole day. But singing and dancing is what they began to do when someone started playing the music of the person that they soon began to sing and dance about.

Because they saw him sing and dance, and were inspired by it.

Yes, some in the back of their minds thought about the embarrassing moments in his life, the humiliating ones. Ones that he may have regretted, ones that have lead friends to leave him or betray him, even though they were never friends to begin with in the first.

And there are many in the back of their minds saying the same, and justified at times, "Why the hell is a celebrity getting more attention then what's wrong in Iran or Afghanistan or Iraq or Darfur or with health care, what is wrong with our American society!"

Even so, there were many (and still are many) who just keep on dancing and singing to not only alleviate a tragic time for them, but posthumously celebrate like they were at a concert watching him.

A dismembered soul can't do things like this. A dismembered soul wouldn't be able to have people randomly sing and dance on their streets.

He was much more than just a dismembered soul. The human spirit is an amazing thing.

Read more »

THE TRULY ANCIENT ONES


We really know so little about the ancients. I mean the real ancients.

You will oft times hear of the 'missing link'. That is so 19th century. Silly really.

I mean Homo Erectus arose, so to speak, amidst several simians 1.8 million years ago. He then discovered fire. He dug a hole, laid some rocks in it, and made fire. Hearth & Home eight hundred thousand years ago. Then he/she took off out of Africa and settled in Europe, Indonesia, China.... At least that is the story line of Western Anthropologists and has been so for well over fifty years of research.

The Homo Erectus of 1.8 Million years ago was different from Homo Erectus eight hundred thousand years ago.  And it certainly is agreed that he/she were floating upon the waters way back when in some sort of fashioned craft. Traveling thousands of miles on land and on sea--by island hopping as other mammals have.

Anthropologists have great difficulty agreeing on whether Homo Erectus in Asia just morphed into the Asian or if 200,000 years ago or 100,000 years ago, Homo Sapiens Sapiens (because many feel HE was part and parcel Homo Sapiens with smaller brains) came once again out of Africa and traversed the world.

Regardless, as I have attempted to point out in earlier blogs, forty thousand years ago SOMETHING HAPPENED.  There was a giant leap forward.  If there is indeed a god, he/she/it reached down and touch a few 'humans' and they changed forever. Magically.

When I become bored with the hum-drum news sites I retire to the magic place known as National Geographic. I would become entranced by NG as a child as I leafed through it. Today I found this:

A vulture-bone flute discovered in a European cave is likely the world's oldest recognizable musical instrument and pushes back humanity's musical roots, a new study says.

Found with fragments of mammoth-ivory flutes, the 40,000-year-old artifact also adds to evidence that music may have given the first European modern humans a strategic advantage over Neanderthals,





The bone-flute pieces were found in 2008 at Hohle Fels, a Stone Age cave in southern Germany, according to the study, led by archaeologist Nicholas Conard of the University of Tübingen in Germany.

With five finger holes and a V-shaped mouthpiece, the almost complete bird-bone flute--made from the naturally hollow wing bone of a griffon vulture--is just 0.3 inch (8 millimeters) wide and was originally about 13 inches (34 centimeters) long.

Flute fragments found earlier at the nearby site of Geissenklösterle have been dated to around 35,000 years ago.

The newfound flutes, though, "date to the very period of settlement in the region by modern humans ... about 40,000 years ago," Conard said.

 The mammoth-ivory flutes would have been especially challenging to make, the team said.

Using only stone tools, the flute maker would have had to split a section of curved ivory along its natural grain. The two halves would then have been hollowed out, carved, and fitted together with an airtight seal.

 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090624-bone-flute-oldest-instrument.html


This find, these flutes really blew me away--pun intended. You see the first cave paintings are 40,000 years old.  Now 'man' had been residing in caves for some time. 100,000 years ago Homo Sapiens Sapiens was residing in caves in the Middle East near groups of Neandertals living in their own caves.

But no paintings.  And wouldn't you know it that NG has another separate article about cave drawings and cave RESONANCE in the same issue:

Prehistoric peoples chose places of natural resonant sound to draw their famed cave sketches, according to new analyses of paleolithic caves in France.

In at least ten locations, drawings of horses, bison, and mammoths seem to match locations that focus, amplify, and transform the sounds of human voices and musical instruments

For example, "maybe horses are related to spaces that sound a certain way," he said.

Reznikoff will present his latest findings this week at the annual meeting of the Acoustics Society of America in Paris.

Strategic Placement

An expert in the acoustics of 11th- and 12th-century European churches, Reznikoff often hums to himself when entering a room for the first time so he can "feel its sounds."

He was surprised to discover that in some of the rooms in Le Portel decorated with painted animals, his humming became noticeably louder and clearer.

"Immediately the idea came," he told National Geographic News. "Would there be a relationship between the location of the painting and the quality of the resonance in these locations?"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/07/080702-cave-paintings.html



PICTURES: Prehistoric European Cave Artists Were Female

June 16, 2009--Inside France's 25,000-year-old Pech Merle cave, hand stencils surround the famed "Spotted Horses" mural.

For about as long as humans have created works of art, they've also left behind handprints. People began stenciling, painting, or chipping imprints of their hands onto rock walls at least 30,000 years ago.

Until recently, most scientists assumed these prehistoric handprints were male. But "even a superficial examination of published photos suggested to me that there were lots of female hands there," Pennsylvania State University archaeologist Dean Snow said of European cave art. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/photogalleries/cave-handprints-actually-women-missions-pictures/index.html

This is yet a third story about the first signatures. A copyright of sorts.  And it appears that the ladies were in on this new wave, as it were. ha!

This juncture in time, forty thousand years ago, is a wonder to me. Paintings. Beautiful paintings ARISE OUT OF NOWHERE. Nothing like it before. Oh you will see movies and documentaries about fire. FORGET IT. WE HAD FIRE FOR A MILLION YEARS.

 

But not painting. And AT THE SAME TIME WE FIND MUSIC. And then we see the great central 'hall' of  the cave as a kind of church. A HOLY PLACE.

 

Something happened to the human brain. Synapses fired. Some chemical reaction took place. Our brains had expanded over that sixty thousand year period. Do not kid yourself. The Homo Sapiens Sapiens of the ME caves was different from us.  But the Homo Sapiens Sapiens of forty thousand years ago did not have any difference in brain capacity than us, really.

The reason I write of this, and that I write of this with a huge degree of reverence is that it fits so well into another theme I have touched on in other blogs, including my recent biblical study posts.

Homer did not sit down one day in 750BC and write the Iliad and the Odyssey like King wrote his hundred novels.  Homer was writing down songs. He was redacting them to a story line. These songs came from different tribes over different times. And his two epics were redacted, probably by some Homeric School over the centuries. 

Homer begins the Epic Iliad with, I sing.... Which is why eight hundred years later Virgil begins the Aeneid:

I sing of arms and the man....

Genesis is a song.......a series of songs written down by at least four authors (or schools of authors) and set down eventually into some order over centuries.

But these National Geographic articles tell me that the human being has been singing sacred songs in his church for forty thousand years. Imagine that!!!

The fire would be lit and the shadows would dance upon the walls making the visages painted on those walls by human hands, dance and change shapes. A truly mystical experience.

The bison, the deer, the mammoth........all moving.

And at the same time, the members of the cave clan would be dancing while flutes were played. (And I would surmise some sort of drum accompaniment) And members were chanting, singing to the music. Carried into a religious trance of community.

 

THESE WERE TRULY THE ANCIENT ONES.









Sorry, I Just Couldn't Resist...


It won't be easy, you'll think it strange
When I try to explain where I was
and I still need more time to come up with a lie

You won't believe it
All you will think is I had an affair
and so I should just tell the truth
Although it is making me cry

I had to see Maria, I had to go
Couldn't stay one more day with my wife
Putting up with her anger, getting nothing but glares

So I chose freedom
Running around, flying secretly too
Neglecting my family and state
To go be with someone who cares


Chorus:

Don't cry for me Appalachia
The truth is I never hiked you
I skipped the wildflowers
Forgot the backpack
I brought my passport
And several condoms

Don't cry for me Appalachia...


(breaks off, in tears)

Have I said too much?
There's nothing more I can think of to say to you
But all you have to do is look at me to know
That every word is true




"Don't be Intimidated by Fear. Keep Marching Forward." REMEMBERING FARRAH


"She really was someone who could look fear in the face and conquer it...When all of us reflect on our own lives, the emotion which controls us so greatly is fear.  I think that was Farrah's message to us in the way she conducted her own journey, is:

"Be as fearless as you can be.  Don't be intimidated by fear.  Keep marching forward.  Do what you think is right.  Fight for what you want to fight for, whether you are losing the battle or not."  (emphasis mine)

--Dr. Lawrence Piro, President, Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, personal physician to Farrah, in an interview with Barbara Walters for ABC.

 

When I remember Farrah Fawcett, I don't think of her dazzling smile or the famous poster in the red bathing suit.  I don't even think of her tabloid personal life--her romantic tumult, her drug-addicted son--I think of her talent, and her guts, and I'm not just talking about the three years she spent battling incurable cancer.

In order to truly understand Farrah's courage, you have to take her life in context of growing up in the 50's and coming of age in the '60's and '70's, especially if you were a pretty girl from the South. 

Pretty girls coming of age in those days were taught to be pleasers.  They were taught to always smile, no matter what, to defer to men in every way, to mask their own intelligence if it meant that other people (read, men) would be threatened by that, and that the only ambition suitable for the time was to find a good husband to take care of you, settle down, and care for him and your houseful of children for the rest of your life. 

If, like Farrah, you were truly beautiful, you were supposed to parlay that beauty into the position it afforded: choice.  By that I mean, you were supposed to choose the man with the most earning potential, the most political power, the most POTENTIAL.  (He, in turn, was to be commended for winning the hand of the prettiest girl in the room.)

You weren't supposed to have any potential of your own, beyond being pretty and pleasing for him.

After a beautiful girl got married, she was supposed to "represent" her husband by how she conducted herself, how she helped propel his career, how she kept her home and raised her children.  If she did everything right, that meant a fine home in the best neighborhood, kids who qualified for the best schools, and so on.

Even when she gave birth, she was not identified in the paper by her own name, but by her husband's.  In fact, for her entire life, her identity was supposed to be a reflection of her husband's, and later, her children's.

It wasn't just pretty girls from the South who rebelled against this corset of an existence.

(Full disclosure: My despairing mother enrolled me in "Charm School" when I was 12, in hopes I would learn how to do things like walk straight with a book on my head, sit properly like a "lady," with my hands lying passively in my lap and my ankles crossed demurely, and deal with any disaster with a smile.  So, in the class, I kept up a steady stream of sarcastic wisecracks which, ultimately, got me kicked out, much to my mom's chagrin.) 

Anyway, as everyone knows, Boomer women rebelled big-time in the '60's and 70's, but it took a couple of decades for their battles to make the kinds of changes that people who were born in the '70's now take for granted.

So, at the time, American culture was still dominated by male-centric themes.  (In that respect, it still is in many ways.  Check out the latest blockbuster movies and see how many have female leads, or females in any serious capacity beyond being The Girlfriend or The Tortured Victim Awaiting Rescue.)

No one could capitalize on the male-dominated themes better than Aaron Spelling, and when he created "Charlie's Angels" and cast three hot, incredibly sexy unknowns in the lead roles, he created a phenomenon that comes along once a decade, if that.

Those of us who were budding feminists enjoyed the program simply because it showed women being brave and intrepid and solving the crime and dodging danger and saving victims--even if they did it in bikinis.  Our husbands and boyfriends enjoyed it for the obvious reasons.

And nobody was a bigger hit than Farrah.  She was a terrible actress at that time, but there was something about her, a quality that went beyond sexiness to seduce us all.  Part of it was the dazzling smile, of course, but it was more than that.  She was fun.  She was playful.  She didn't take the part seriously because she knew nobody else did, so in a way, she was winking and nudging her audience as if to say, "It's okay.  I get the joke, too."

We all fell in love--by the bazillions--so when, after only one season on the program, she suddenly quit the show, it caused a cultural tsunami that makes Jon and Kate's divorce seem like child's play.

You have to understand how hard that was for her.  Aaron Spelling was the most powerful man in Hollywood at the time and had limitless legal options to destroy her, which is what he tried to do.  She was still under contract, and there were suits and countersuits that would tie up much of her time and most of her fortune for years.

Not only that, but because she'd signed a contract with the program for several years, then she was not permitted to work in the business for years after that.  Not just because of the obvious reasons, but because Spelling was so powerful that nobody really wanted to cross him.

Farrah Fawcett's decision to leave Charlies Angels was part of a multi-pronged effort to reinvent herself and rechannel her career.  She also fired her agent and her manager, and left her husband, Lee Majors, who was himself a huge TV star at the time.

She could see that if she had stayed with the TV show season after season, she would be branded as the T-and-A girl, the ingenue, the sexpot lead.  And she knew how short the careers are for girls who base their careers on that, and that alone.

That was not what Farrah wanted.  She wanted to be taken seriously as an actor, and she knew that the longer she stayed entangled in the Spelling spiderweb, the less chance she'd have to achieve that goal.

During her time out of the limelight, she studied acting, and she read, and she painted and sculpted, and she tried to get people to see past the hair and the teeth.

In an interview with Barbara Walters in 1980, her famous hair was straight, as if she'd just gotten out of bed and run a brush through it.  She said that her looks were sometimes "a curse," which I'm sure most viewers took as arrogance but was in fact, raw honesty.

When Hollywood failed to give her any leeway, she left for New York, where she got the lead of a small play off-Broadway called "Extremities," which is about a rape victim who, several years later, encounters her rapist--who does not remember her at all--when he shows up at her home in an official capacity as some kind of repairman.  (Been a while since I've seen it.)

She turns the tables on him by using his short memory against him, luring him into a trap she sets for him in which she keeps him imprisoned and proceeds to torture him in revenge.

For the part, Farrah cut off her famous hair in a short shoulder-bob, and delivered the performance of her life; it was searing, raw, almost too painful to watch, and so powerful that it landed her the lead in the TV movie based on the play.

That role relaunched her career and garnered her an Emmy nomination--the first of three. 

After that, she played her most memorable part as a wife who is so horrifically abused by her husband that she sets fire to him in bed.  Based on a true story, in which the woman was not convicted for the crime because the jury was so horrified by the details of her abuse at her husband's hands, changed public discourse on the battered wife and put Farrah on the map as a talent to be reckoned with.

Her next Emmy nomination came for playing the lead role in Ann Rule's "Small Sacrifices," about a woman who killed her three children (actually one survived, but barely), because her boyfriend didn't like kids.

These roles were gritty and tough, and for the better part of a decade, Fawcett held our attention in one TV-movie after another, proving herself time and again, but unfortunately, that's not what interested the tabloids.

Yes, I would like to have seen Farrah be as forceful and tough in her personal life as she was in her career.  She got involved with more than one man who turned out to be abusive.  All I can say is, it takes a long time to throw off that pleaser-trait that's been so closely bred into you throughout your childhood and adolescence, especially where men are concerned.

She did eventually kick them all out, living on her own for years until her longtime-love, Ryan O'Neal was himself diagnosed with lieukemia eight years ago and then her own devastating illness, after which he never left her side.

As Farrah aged, the scripts that were offered her were fewer and further between, (a fate typical of most actresses), leaving her in a virtual career-desert throughout most of her 40's, so in typical Farrah fashion, she threw it all back in their faces by posting for Playboy magazine at 48 and again at 50--the bestselling covers the magazine ever had.

You have to understand something here.  Before Farrah, beautiful actresses did not take parts where they chopped off their trademark hair and allowed the camera to show them ravaged.  It just was not done.

Years later, when Charleze Theron gained weight and butched her way to an Oscar by playing serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Monster, she had Farrah Fawcett to thank for giving her the courage to do it.

And see, before Farrah, women in their late 40's and early 50's wouldn't have been caught DEAD in Playboy magaine or anywhere else that displayed their bodies.

It just was not done.

But Farrah did it.  She lived her life on her own terms--mistakes and all.

The David Letterman show was a disastrous mistake.  Ryan O'Neal, her lover of 30 years, insists that Farrah was not drunk or stoned or on any kind of prescription drugs when she made the appearance as a spaced-out aging beauty queen who could barely hold a thought. 

She told him, he says, that she thought it would be funny.  It was--but at her expense.

A few more years passed, but Farrah refused to go to the elephant burial grounds of all aging ingenues.

She produced, directed, and starred in a show for the Playboy network in which she painted giant murals with her own nude body, covered in paint, while O'Neal sat nearby and watched.

It was outrageous; it was bodacious; it was glorious.

Until that special, most people did not even realize that Farrah Fawcett was a gifted artist in her own right, a sculpter of sweeping sensuality and delicate beauty.

She just kept fighting, you see, long after all the others had given up.

When Fawcett was diagnosed in 2006, at the age of 59, with a very rare form of cancer, she did something that might have struck so many as unexpected but really wasn't if you'd been paying attention to more than just the smile and the body: she picked up a handheld video camera and took it along with her to chemotherapy and doctor's visits, eventually enlisting friends to help.

They told her she was going to die but she was so sure that she could beat it that she thought, this way, she could demystify so much that terrifies the rest of us about cancer, maybe help fellow sufferers by giving them courage and heart for their own battles.

When her magnificent hair began falling out in huge gobs, she filmed it.

When chemo made her vomit, the camera did not turn away and neither did she.

When her hair was gone for good, she showed off her brave bald head and kept on fighting.

And when the doctors told her that the tumors had spread and spread and that, even though she'd been feeling so much better, she was not, in fact, going to beat it, she cried and did not ask the cameras to quit filming.

This was Farrah, the REAL Farrah, the Farrah who'd been there all along for anyone to see who'd been looking beyond the red bathing suit.

(The resulting documentary special, Farrah's Story, is going to be re-aired on NBC tonight, I believe.  You'll have to channel-check because it won't be on any TV guide schedules.) 

Farrah Fawcett was, arguably in her prime, the most beautiful woman in the world.  But her beauty went far beyond the smile and the hair and the body.  It went soul-deep.  She was funny and fiesty and brave and talented and gentle.  She loved her family and friends with ferocity and passion, taking time even in her dying days to hand-write letters of love to each of them in her graceful, flowing script.

We can learn so much more from Farrah than how to fix our hair.

As her grieving doctor so eloquently put it, we can learn to fight for what we want to fight for, whether we are winning the battle or not.

Good night, sweet beautiful Farrah.

And thank you.

More on Republicans' Prostitutes


I'm sure a prostitue would give a much better massage than your wife, who probably doesn't care how it ends....

Slutty Prudes: The way it really is


The Republican Status Quo is what it is. Democrats get caught with gaudy baubles and half-ass money stings.
Is is because of the basic Victorian obsession of control, or is a mania caused by campaigning hard for Sharia-style behavior codes and beating the Gun-Ho drum about Lady Liberty?
I think the people who sell it best, that is the 'moral decline' and anti-'moral relativism (As if morality were anything but situational) blabbers are fascinated with control and sovereignty because these red-light ideas keep them awake at night otherwise.
I went to college, and I went to high school. I know the prudes lost their minds as soon as they tasted that tiny, intense pleasure. Now they have them lining up to give blowjobs, using their abstinence pledges as a bib.
Want a good time, check out the College Republicans sorority.  

Kurtz nailed it


I want to thank David Kurtz for synthesizing something's been bothering me since I first noticed a difference between principle and simple peevishness. 
There's only a few things government can be used for. FIrst, you can allocate public resources and maintain things. Then you can either work to start something or to end something. Then there's a Democratic way, with studies and forums and shouting matches and eventually 50% of what was desired may come out of a committee. And then there's the Republican way, which seems to take no steps along any clearly defined path to learning or development of the topic.
Simply admitting they understand the opponent's position is impossible for one reason. They aren't here to govern, just to allocate and confuse the issue- because the constituency the RNC panders to is now perfectly, Orwellian-style, senile, maleducated, void of perspective, or 'Walking the Appalachian Trail' munching on Combos they bought with money earned from saying 'People shouldn't walk the Appalachian Trail'.
I still have a 100degree fever, so I'm done. But thanks again.

North Korean propaganda art is nearly always pretty interesting


Check out the poster in this photo: North Koreans rallied in Pyongyang on Thursday, shouting anti-American slogans and denouncing international sanctions

which accompanies this New York Times report: North Koreans Condemn U.S. and Sanctions at Huge Rally by Choe San-Hung, June 25, 2009 .

Who is the little blond guy in the American bomb being smashed by giant North Korean hands? He looks to me like he has Poppy Bush's face.

The Genesys of Michael Jackson: You Call This Weird?


I continue to be puzzled by people thinking Michael Jackson was excessively “weird”. Uh, he’s a wealthy musician, right? Let’s see, here’s a not-so-wealthy one I might accept as “weird” (note to on-line censor: this is a MAN, therefore his breasts can be viewed and are not erotic or porn):

(click image for story)

That’s Genesis P. Orridge, founding member of Industrial Throbbing Gristle, later Psychic TV & the Temple of Psychic Youth, who besides his transformation into his deceased wife once had his teeth pulled to replace them with gold ones. Taking a trip down memory lane, there’s Frank Zappa, Nick Cave, Trent Reznor (moving into the Tate/Polanski house?), Nina Hagen, Bowie in the 70’s, Iggy Pop leaping onto glass, Lou Reed as Transformer, Gibby Haynes and the Butthole Surfers, Exene, Captain Beefhart, Ian Curtis of Joy Division, Patti Smith, Robert Smith. These are mainstream artists. Then there’s Pete Burns of “You Spin Me Round” fame, well-known androgenist along with aficionado of plastic surgery, and numerous underground too-bizarre-for-prime-time artists.

Bowie looks like an alien and people think him a genius. Michael Jackson goes pale and he’s a freak. Every day large numbers of girls get breast implants, people get nose jobs, lip implants, tummy tucks, all sorts of gimmicks to be “cute”. The Red Hot Chili Peppers have how many tatoos, piercings, shavings, and they’re “cool”.

Then look at behavior, whether violent (Phil Spector, Ike Turner, the guys in New Order, Bobby Brown, various gun-wielding rap artists), drug use (Johnny Winter, Sid Barrett, Hendrix, Guns ‘n Roses, Smashing Pumpkins), outrageous spending habits (Jimmy Page and his Aleister Crowley castle, Mariah Carey & her $125 million mansion, and too many other cases of diamonds and limos to count). Aside from Page’s mystical bent, there’s Neil Young’s love of toy trains, Ted Nugent’s gun and bow collection, Demi Moore’s collection of dollhouses (ok, not a musician), Perry Farrell’s burning cupie dolls, and I’m sure many more, some of them distinctly “childish”. And don’t even start on religious conversions that make Spinal Tap look moderate.

In a profession where whites like to act black, it certainly didn’t help Jackson to go the reverse, getting lighter by the decade, though it’s hard to imagine him playing with Slash while looking like he did on Off The Wall. But why are his image changes whack when George Clinton wearing dreads and a diaper is hip? All of this was before the pedophile charges. Was Jacko just too shy (like the Cocteau Twins, the world’s shyest band)? Or was there really something weird about him that made him stand out in a profession full of weirdos? I look at the video of Black and White, and I see him as as a kind of performance art, morphing himself from one profile to another. Perhaps that personal performance has to wait to be appreciated, still too far ahead of its time. We like our art to be artificial, and in that way Jackson’s might have been a bit too real for our comfort.

One artist I appreciate of late is Mickey Rourke, who took his box office pulling good looks and put them in a boxing ring, getting his face looking beat and pummelled and rugged and near-fossilized. Which looks like it means that now he can act, rather than just primp - he’s back in front of the camera with a presence he never had before. Maybe that’s the price of real success, being a freak even to yourself. As Kazantzakis’ St. Francis said, “All roads lead to the earth - God is an abyss - Jump!!!” And jump they did.

A Miss American dysadventure


This is my tribute to Doc Nebula and his Dream Research Project, pulp role-playing... sci-fi... thing. And because I'm bored. So very, very bored...

Monaco - 1964

Fighting off her tears of shame and torment, the Princess struggled against the taunt nylon cords binding her to the doorknob of the ornate liquor cabinet.

Read more »

Psycho from the Eighties with a Messed-Up Nose


Considering that Michael Jackson was a psycho from the Eighties with a messed-up nose, it's just plain weird that one little word is missing from almost all of the 1,000,000 obituaries and "testimonials" which have flooded the internet and airwaves in the last 24 hours...

But why would you want to hear that one little word from me, when you can hear it from Eric Clapton live from Tokyo, with one of the greatest tour bands ever assembled by anybody anywhere?

Michael Jackson


It's amazing to me that I suddenly don't mind listening to Michael Jackson music anymore.  The idea of listening, let alone buying any of his music, repulsed me for the last 15 years until just today.  The old enabling a child molester thing I guess.

Suddenly I take great joy in the wonderful artist he truly was.  What a very sad and tragic figure.  I hope wherever he is now he has found some peace.

But what a superstar he was!  I doubt we'll ever see his like again in our lifetimes.

CHEEZY FARRAH VIDEOS! Check out the antedeluvian Ultra-Brite ad and her oversexxed Noxema stick!


Early on she was being marketed on a pretty basic level -- click on each below to broaden your horizons!

1.  Queer-as-can-be Ultra-Brite ad 

2. Softcore Noxema with Joe Namath 

Cheers to all,
O.T.

Sick Around the World, the book, a reminder of what Washington wants to forget


As our favorite politicos fall all over each other to see who can further erode the healthcare package likely to emerge from Congress, it's worth recalling that there is another way.

But first, get a glimpse of the latest fiasco moving forward in the Senate Finance Committee, where Max Baucus is leading the charge to develop the all important "bi-partisan" reform bill.

Today's news is that "everyone's smiling" -- says Kent Conrad, author of the embarrassingly weak proposal for "non-profit coops" as an alternative to the public option, much less the real reform, single payer.

Why? Because they've found a way to cut the price tag by $400 billion. How?

Largely by reducing the amount of subsidies for low-income individuals to buy insurance

Well, thank goodness. At least that means less public money going into the pockets of the already gorged insurance giants.

Too bad it means more people are likely to go bankrupt or self-ration needed care when Congress passes a bill forcing everyone to buy insurance with no meaningful limits on what the private insurers can charge.

Is there another route? Yes, and it's not a secret.

The rest of the world has figured it out, as T.R. Reid reminds us in the forthcoming publication of "The Healing of America. A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care." (Penguin Press) Essentially it's the print version of the acclaimed Sick Around the World PBS show from last year.

By now, most people have heard how the U.S. ranked just 37th in the World Health Organization's overall scorecard earlier this decade. Or how the Commonwealth Fund listed the U.S. last year as last among 19 industrial nations in preventable deaths.

But how about this one.

When the WHO assessed 191 countries on the barometer of "fairness," the U.S. stumbled in at a bare 54th, barely beating out the impoverished African nations of Chad and Rwanda, but still behind Bangladesh and the Maldives. Not exactly a badge of honor

Can we do better? Of course we can, says Reid, just by learning from the experiences of the rest of the world, especially those other comparable industrial nations which all have some form of national healthcare system -- one in which their citizens' health is not held hostage by profit-making private insurance companies. He concludes:

Most rich countries have been national health statistics -- longer life expectancy, lower infant mortality, better recovery rates from major diseases" than does the U.S. And they also perform better in presenting patients "a greater choice of doctors, hospitals, and procedures.

For those who say we should not taint our borders by emulating France or Germany or Canada, Reid offers this retort:

We have borrowed numerous foreign innovations that have become staples of American daily life: public broadcasting, text messaging, pizza, sushi, yoga, reality TV, The Office, and even American Idol.

Apparently we consider our health to be less important.

Reid also provides a useful service in knocking down most of the myths about other national systems that are common grist for the likes of Fox TV and the conservative think tanks.

Such as "they ration care with waiting list and limited choices;" in fact the data varies widely among other countries, and if you want to see really hideous waits, rationing of care, and limited choices, check out most American ERs and insurance network restrictions.

If there's one crucial difference between the U.S. and all the other countries he surveyed, says Reid, it's the moral dimension.

Whether a society should guarantee health care, the way we guarantee the right to think and pray as you like, to get an education, to vote in free elections? Or is medicine a commodity to be bought and sold, a product like a car, a computer, or a camera?

Apparently that is what makes our system "uniquely American." As Reid puts it, "all the developed countries except the United States have decided that every human has a basic right to health care."

And, that "no other country relies on for-profit insurance companies to pay for basic health care."

President Obama who in 2003 notably described himself as a single payer advocate, now says it would be too disruptive to the present system to do that now. Well, a lot of people believe our dysfunctional, profit-focused healthcare system needs some good disruption.

And, there's plenty of examples abroad that you can remake your healthcare system, and make it better, as a number of industrial countries did in the wreckage after World War II.

There's a more recent example, Taiwan, which in 1994 scrapped its own broken system and adopted a single payer approach similar to Canada. 

Almost overnight, Reid notes, every resident of Taiwan, in their new national single payer system, had complete choice of provider, cut administrative costs to a mere 2 percent, and experienced striking improvements in patient outcomes.

While Taiwan, like some other national systems, has some problems today, mostly with underfunding, it has a much more equitable healthcare infrastructure, and guarantees healthcare coverage for everyone.

With immensely more resources than other nations, there's no reason we couldn't learn from their successes, their mistakes, and adopt a national system that would be far more humane than the disaster we have now.

David Didn't Resign Over Bathsheba; So Why Should Sanford?


I can't think of a single reason.

After all, like David, Mark Sanford was chosen by God to lead his people. Like David, he had dozens of concubines and wives. Like David, and John Ashcroft, too, he was anointed with oil. Like Solomon, Mark Sanford rejected all worldly goods offered him by God and asked for wisdom instead.

The worst example of religious political hypocrisy I've ever seen--and I've seen plenty. On a side note, it appears that Maria's job and its connection to South Carolina's business interests, however distant, reminds me nothing so much as Roy Blunt Jr destroying HIS marriage by becoming lovers with a TOBACCO LOBBYIST.

This tobacco lobbyist is his wife today. And yet the incredibly red 7th Congressional District of Missouri keeps voting this hypocrite back into office.

Those Republican family values, and the pretzel logic that goes with them. Pure comedy GOLD, baby!

Below the Fold ALREADY?


While I was away at college, my troubled cousin took his own life in a dramatic living room standoff in front of his wife and toddler children. My mother told me that the story didn't make the New York papers because something else catastrophic happened that day, and I remember thinking, "what a relief."

I don't wish the Governor of South Carolina any ill will. His reputation as a cheapskate has amused me from time to time. It was refreshing, though, to see a man five years younger than me (and who looks ten years older), giddy with excitement and filled with love light for once in his life.

Of course, the Charleston paper is all-Sanford, even today, but have the recent Hollywood losses pushed poor Sanford below the fold ALREADY? There was so much more to be milked from this story!

Weekend Video Roundup: Why We Fight (Idaho Edition)


Interview with Lieutenant Colonel Victor J. Fehrenbach on local Idaho TV 7:

Read more »

Not all public options are created equal


One danger a public plan could face is that it becomes the dumping ground for high-risk patients, suffers higher costs, raises rates, loses members, and basically replicates the process by which non-profit, community-rated Blue Cross/Blue Shield got destroyed by HMOs, transforming the Blues into the for-profit monsters they (mostly?) are today. h/t to Matt Yglesias, who flagged this important article by Paul Starr:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=perils_of_the_public_plan

Good reading, and we need to make sure we get what we need, not just any public plan.

Dragons in the Mist


Everywhere you go in the world Dragon Whole and Dragon Hole are at each others' throats. But their long drawn-out contest is nothing new.

For ages and ages they had grappled in fierce contentions; then along came new inventions, so they debated with fierce intentions.

"Yada, yada, yada," roared Dragon Whole.
"Blah, blah, blah," Dragon Hole retaliated.
DW: "You're outmoded and irrelevant."
DH:  "You'fe outlandish and irresponsible."
DW: "You would forever tolerate the haves taking advantage of the have-nots."
DH:  "You want the government to do everything."
DW:  "Only the public sector can clean up this mess you've made."
DH:   "Who are you kidding? Fanny and Freddy started the whole dam thing."
"Yeah? Well the dam burst because you overloaded it with derivatives and CDSs."
"No. The dam burst because you've got everybody expecting a handout."
"Yeah, right. BofA and Citi."
"Uh, no. They'll pay that back. It's UAW and Acorn that got this economy hog-tied."
"Yada, yada, yada," roared Dragon Whole.
"Blah, blah, blah," Dragon Hole retaliated.
DW:  "You never found those WMD, did ya?"
DH:   "Don't go changing the subject.  You don't even know what a balanced budget looks like."
DW:  "Excuse me. It was Billy bob who had a balanced budget before you started throwing money at the eternal Sunni-Shiite bone of contention."

There's another Dragon Whole vs. Dragon Hole thing going on. Anyway,

DH:   "Don't forget 9/11."
DW:  "How can I?  That's all you ever talk about."
DH:   "It never happened again, did it?  We chased their terrorist asses out into the desert."
DW:  "Uh, more like, into a hole.  A bottomless cave in Afghanistan that--"
DH:   "Bottomless?  Bottomless is what the dollar will be when Bill and Ben crank up those government printing presses."
Dragon Whole: "It's all relative.  As a percentage of GDP it's nowhere near what it was after WWII, and we recovered from that well enough."

Dragon Hole sighed and cast an exasperated eye upon his nemesis."You know, that's your problem. You think everything is relative. You have no absolute values, no moral compass."
Dragon Whole:  "Oh yeah? Don't go changing the subject on me now. Besides, who are you to claim the moral high ground? You should have given  your boys on Wall Street a little moral instruction before they ran the capitalist system aground on the rocks of greed. Now we have to bail them out."
DH:  "No, you don't.  We don't want your money."
DW: "What are you talking about? It was your man Hank who cut the deal.  The fox guardin' the chicken house is what that was. Furthermore, don't give me that 'We don't want your money' crap. That's what your man San said before he took his little state-financed holiday makin' whoopee in Argentina. No, you guys are so, like, totally without a leg to stand.  It's time for you to abdicate,  just get out of the way, and we'll take care of everything from here on out. We'll clean up this mess.

Dragon Hole hung his head in shame, let his tail fall between his legs and started to walk away. Red scales fell like rain. Hole no longer went to play along the merry lane.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch...To be continued...

Carey Rowland, author of Glass Chimera 



Bongo is Dead!


Photobucket

Fans of corrupt African dictator Omar Bongo are still in shock and mourning after Mr. Bongo's death June 8, 2009, at a private clinic in Barcelona, Spain. Mr. Bongo had administered the central African nation of Gabon as a cash-cow for himself and his friends ever since he assumed the Presidency in 1967.

Gabon's economy depends almost entirely on income from off-shore oil deposits, but even in comparison with other petrol-economies, Gabon's level of dependence on oil is freakishly complete.

Only 1 per cent of its land is cultivated and Gabon produces virtually no food. Instead, basics such as tomatoes are imported from France, the former colonial master, and neighbouring Cameroon, pushing prices so high that Libreville, the capital, is the world's eighth most expensive city, according to Employment Conditions Abroad International.

Although average income in Gabon is $14,400, comparable to Portugal, most of the population still lives in abject poverty, because of systemic corruption at every level of government. Mr. Bongo himself was the proud owner of a $30 million mansion in Paris, as well as 32 other properties elsewhere in France, including four villas in Nice.

30% of the people of Gabon earn less than $1 per day.






Who is Jacob Freeze?

The Soundtrack Of My Youth: How I Remember Michael Jackson


One of the greatest joys of my early teenage years (1984-1988) was waking up on a Saturday morning with $20 in my pocket and nothing to do.

I'd get dressed, grab my Walkman, and pop in a favorite cassette.  Then, I'd walk down to the bus stop at the corner of State & Vogel in East St. Louis, and catch the 560 eastbound to Union Station in downtown St. Louis.

I'd spend the day window-shopping, maybe buying a few small things here and there.  Then I'd get a meal at McDonald's, and walk around some more.  I could explore the downtown area at my leisure.  I would go to the library, Kiener Plaza, Busch Stadium, St. Louis Centre, the Eagleton Building, the Old Courthouse, the Cathedral Basilica, and the Arch.  I always made a point of doubling back to Union Station to catch the ongoing show at the Fudge Factory.

I'd finish this excellent day by going to the Wehrenberg Theatre back at Union Station, and watching a couple of movies, munching on freshly made vanilla fudge.  Then, I'd have exactly enough money to catch the 560 back home around 10pm.  (The same day now, of course, would cost me around $80 - and it's hard to imagine allowing a pre-teen to have that kind of unsupervised trip in today's world.)

The only constant on these trips would be my Walkman.  And, no matter whether I was listening to the radio or my cassette, there was an excellent chance that Michael Jackson was in heavy rotation.

Growing up then, there was no substitute for Michael.  He WAS popular music.  Of course, there were other top-selling artists at the time (Phil Collins, Lionel Richie, etc.).  But Michael Jackson simply towered over his industry - and his culture. 

His face was on everything - t-shirts, lunchboxes, school folders, album covers, posters, TV screens.  That bus I would ride to St. Louis?  Chances were, there was at least one unoccupied window seat - right next to a window with a one-foot-diameter splotch of Jheri curl juice from some Jackson fan leaning his or her head against the glass. 

He signed nine-figure contracts, won awards by the busload, and released albums with multiple #1 hits.  Four of his albums DEBUTED at Billboard's #1 spot. 

How much oxygen did Michael suck up?  In 1983, Lionel Richie released "Can't Slow Down", which was a monster album that had a number of top singles and reached #1 on Billboard's Top 100 Albums.  The next year, Richie was basically shut out of the AMA and Grammy awards.  You see, he'd had the misfortune of releasing "Can't Slow Down" the same year that Michael Jackson unleashed "Thriller".  In any other year, Richie would likely have won a half-dozen Grammys for his work.

Michael's videos were groundbreaking.  The "Billie Jean" and "Thriller" videos, in particular, inspired a generation of young artists and helped launch the music video to a position of entertainment pre-eminence.

If you ever got to go to a Michael Jackson concert, you could see firsthand why he was the top entertainer of his generation.  He had a natural showman's flair, and could captivate an audience for hours on end. 

His concert styling not only spilled over to his own clothing, but into haute couture as well.  Red leather jackets with dozens of zippers did more than their share of damage to parents' car paint.  A single sequined glove with matching sequined socks (and, natch, the flooding black pants designed to show off said socks) could be seen on many a teenager.  And many of my friends (I'm not copping to any this!) rocked the gold-rimmed aviator sunglasses as well.

And the dancing!  More than one kid in my school turned an ankle trying desperately to moonwalk.  He was a blend of precision and panache that left other musicians in the dust. 

Michael gave freely of his money AND his time.  "We Are The World" (which he co-wrote with Richie) started the wave of celebrity collaborations and concerts aimed at promoting charitable causes.  He was honored by two different Presidents (Reagan and Bush 41) for his charitable work.

Later, of course, I would find out more about his past - and shake my head in disappointment at his latest antics.  I would wonder how much the abuse he suffered from his father affected his later life.  And I would long ponder the idea that, perhaps, he was too successful - and just couldn't handle being the world's biggest celebrity. 

His death basically took over the news.  He was a headline item even on *sports* websites.  I know that many people have been critical of the amount of coverage his death and other "fluff" news items have received.  But what you have to keep in mind about Michael is that his personality and creative genius always hogged the spotlight.  Though there may be more "important" stories, the relative youth and the unexpected demise of this musical Colossus make it front-page news.

It's been estimated that the song catalog he still owns is worth billions, and he was estimated to be worth close to a billion dollars at his peak (and this was in late '80s dollars).  Yet, he's thought to be as much as $400 million in the red, and his last days were spent in a rented house.  (Granted, the rent was a cool $100,000 per month, but still.)

But, when I think of Michael Jackson, I don't think of the money, the lawsuits, the jokes, the weird news stories (many of which were not only false, but also planted by Jackson himself) or the crushing fame he had for virtually his entire life.  I also don't think of the unfulfilled promise, and just how much more he could have contributed musically if his personal life hadn't imploded.

I think instead of the musical genius that he was.  I think of the songs that defined my generation and inspired people of all races the world over.  I think of his dancing and style that were embraced by kids of all cultures.  I think of the self-assured voice on that Walkman, singing away.  If any one person could truly be said to be my generation's Elvis, it would have to be his former son-in-law, hands down. 

Michael Jackson was more than the background noise on those Saturday trips.  He was, in many ways, the soundtrack of my youth.  So, as I sang along with him then, I sing of him now. 

God speed, Michael. 

Obama administration - national security and secrecy: reference links


Seal of the Office of the Director of National...Image via Wikipedia

Domestic Surveillance and National Security:

"FBI and States Vastly Expand DNA Databases," is by Solomon Moore at The New York Times (4/18/09).

"Role of Bush NSA Plan Under Review," is by Ellen Nakashima at the Washington Post (4/17/09).

"The 6-Month Review," is by emptywheel (4/16/09). Re warrantless wiretapping.

"Head of Senate Panel Calls For Hearing on Wiretaps," is by Eric Lichtblau and James Risen at The New York Times (4/16/09).

"Feingold: NYT Report Shows We Need to Fix Wiretapping Laws," is by Zachary Roth at TPM Muckraker (4/16/09). Also, "Report: NSA Tried to Wiretap Member of Congress," (4/16/09).

"The NYT predictable revelation:new FISA law enabled massive abuses," is by Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com (4/16/09).

"Documents: FBI Spyware Has Been Snaring Extortionists, Hackers for Years," is by Kevin Poulson at Wired- Threat Level (4/16/09).

"Lichtblau and Risen Report Wiretapping of Americans ... Again," is by emptywheel (4/15/09). NYT story.

"Did Holder Know About the 'Significant Misconduct' When DOJ Claimed Sovereign Immunity," is by emptywheel (4/15/09).

"Fusion Centers: Listen to us Already," is by Amanda Simon at the ACLU Blog of Rights (4/8/09).

"Credit Where Due: Keith Olbermann Edition," is by bmaz at emptywheel (4/8/09). Regards Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act lawsuit by EEF.

"Roslyn Mazer to be ODNI Inspector General," is by Steven Aftergood at Secrecy News (4/6/09).

"IG Report Blasts the Director of National Intelligence," is by Steven Aftergood at Secrecy News (4/2/09). Report: November 2008.

"What the Scope of the IG Report on Warrantless Wiretapping Tells Us," is by emptywheel (3/31/09).

"President's Intel Advisor Board Members All Resigned," is by Steven Aftergood at Secrecy News (3/17/09).


Government Secrecy:

"An emerging progressive consensus on Obama's executive power and secrecy abuses," is by Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com (4/13/09).

"Courts Pay Attention to New FOIA Policy," is by Steven Aftergood at Secrecy News (3/26/09).

"A Test of the New FOIA Policy," is by Steven Aftergood at Secrecy News (3/24/09).

Related articles by Zemanta Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Islam...


Nice religion you got there. But to be fair, Christianity ain't a whole
hell of a lot better.

C

You know who's *HAPPY* that Michael Jackson is dead BTW?


1.  The Iranian mullahs, that's who.

The story was starting to fade anyway as CNN's I-reporters and anyone else with an electronic device gets them violently confiscated now.  

CNN was in a loop BTW of repeating how *extremely* important it was that people send this stuff in, then *marvelling* at what they sent in.  Just when the Iranian goon squads are starting to break that inflammatory cycle, Michael sets off a global sensation for them to cover 24/7. 

2a.  I'm not saying he's happy, but Sanford (who has *no* intention of resigning be assured) must be a little relieved as well.  But he's got to deal now with the fact that he personally steered a trade mission that wasn't going to Argentina, on to Argentina.  He promises to reimburse for his part of that cooked-up leg, but he should reimburse for all attendees' tickets, hotels, meals of that entire sexcapade joy ride *and* resign.  A tiny bit of pressure will come off him, as he's now not the only news.  As I've said in the TPM-aholics chat room on Mibbit, I'm totally fine with the love story and the empathy and needs-time-for-his-family meme, once he is OUT of office in the near future.  And that Maria, depending on the angle she is shot from, can be some kind of eye candy, and that may threaten his softly-soflty bamboozlement. The romance BTW seems to be especially popular among some women, and that's wonderful for me too once he is GONE but that's not his plan.

2b.  You know Ensign's breathing even easier than before.  (But you can bet them bearded mullahs are just as pleased as punch.)   

Banning the Burqa in France: A Step in the Right Direction or a Political Tool?


Nicolas Sarkozy traveled to historic Versailles this week to addres a double session of the French Congress (the first time this has happened since the nineteenth century) in order to call for a number of reforms (especially in the public sector). Many of his proposals are sure to anger the Socialists here. But to make the pill a bit sweeter, he offered an olive branch to his leftist opponents: he came out strongly against the burqa, the full-length Islamic garment that covers a woman from head to toe.

If this proposal sounds familiar, it is because it is. Headscarves were banned in public schools here in 2004 under Sarkozy's predecessor Jacques Chirac, in a move that was declared by both parties to be a victory for women.

In fact, coming out against various Islamic practices, mostly concerning the female sex, has  proved a useful political tool for ruling politicians here. 70% of the French population supported the headscarf ban and the bill unsurprisingly gained bi-partisan support. In fact, aversion to Islam seems a defining element of the French voting base, for while not everyone in France is secular,  the French are fiercely protective of the secular state and are generally confused about how to allow Muslims to practice their faith while having little or no impact on French society.

Sarkozy appears to have aimed well yet again (he was Minister of the Interior during the previous debate on headscarves): a bi-partisan bill has been rapidly introduced in parliament here banning the burqa. but are these repeated attacks on Islamic practices concerning women a step in the right direction or a subversive culture war that could have unexpected consequences?

I'm no advocate of the Burqa, but I know a political unifyer (the opposite of a wedge issue) when I see one.

There is no easy solution to this problem, but French politicians, it seems to me, are playing a delicate and potentially explosive game: waging an under the radar culture war (disguised as a womens' rights campaign), in a bid to protect traditional French secular values. 


Car Loans With Bad Credit & Car Loans For Student Good News


Resource:http://news.google.com/news/story?hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL_enIN305&q=car+loans+with+bad+credit&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dHLi1-MX3PZ9RKM&ei=iZNESvudHNCIkQWcxOy9Dw&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=4

Get Car Loans With Bad Credit & Student Car Loan Approval

car loans,bad credit car loans,car loans with bad credit

Consumers will always need to be aware. Some lenders who promise easy car loans for bad credit can get borrowers into even more hot water. Some automotive dealers abuse the system. They artificially inflate vehicle prices and interest rates of their loans. Others try to convince consumers that extra amenities such as extended warranties and added insurance are non-negotiable. Make sure to read all documents thoroughly. A few lenders have used a bait and switch tactic, claiming that the initial loan "fell through" and must be replaced with a higher-interest loan on used car loans.

Always enter the process armed with knowledge. If possible, negotiate a loan before deciding to purchase a vehicle. Not going through a dealer may eliminate a first choice of an automobile, but may secure a more affordable used car finance or new car loans. Also, consumers must know their credit score.

car loan

Some lenders may fabricate, even lower, a customer's rating in order to negotiate a more costly loan. Reports are available for free on many online websites, but to obtain a more accurate rating, consumers must contact each of the three credit agencies: Equifax, Experian and Trans Union. Experts advise to check these reports annually and correct any errors immediately. Misinformation can lower ratings and jeopardize future loan applications. Which also lower ratings? Finally, shop around. Compare car loan rates and deals offered through banks, dealerships and online lenders. Many online companies have a network of lenders who specifically focus on auto loans for bad credit and can often get consumers better deals. But even websites vary in their scope. Some deal with hundreds of lenders nationwide while others focus on a local region.

When applying for car loans online, most web companies focusing on bad credit car loans will need basic personal information such as full name and social security number as well as specific information about rent or mortgage, length of time at current address, and addresses from the past seven years. They will also question borrowers about recent bankruptcy, report numbers, and even alimony support. Before applying, review financial history, prepare all documentation and decide how much to borrow. This will make the application process easier and quicker to complete.

Car Loans For Colleage Student

Get industry best low rate car loans for collage student with same day finance scheme.Fill out our FREE car loan application and get free quote in just 60 seconds. If you are a student and looking for a car loan then this is the best place to get it.We have launched a guaranteed approval car loans programs for all students. You need a car to get to and from your brand new job that you started.

In this day and age you will find that there are many people that are located within the United states that are having to deal with the issue of having to try and go about getting themselves in any expenses doing car financing . When you are going to try and figure out a solution to deal with these types of issues it is going to be to the best of your advantage to go about not feeling as burden or stressed about the situation and not feel as if there is no hope for your particular situation.

As long as you go about taking all of the required time and energy you will be able to go about finding yourself a good seeding car loan whether you have good credit or bad credit simply because on the Internet there are thousands of different student car loans companies out there that are capable of dealing with people that have all types of different credit issues. Access these companies is simply only a couple of mouse clicks from being able to give you what you desire as soon as you can possibly ever want it.

Advantages of Car Loans Students For Collage Student

  • Loan process is easy and hassle FREE
  • Students get instant approval without credit question
  • Low interest rates apply for Students
  • Free advice for students from car experts and loan professional
  • Any student car apply from anywhere
  • Growing Up With Michael Jackson






      "I rock in the tree tops,

      all the day long,

      rockin' and a robin

      and a singing this song..."




    "Rockin Robin" was one of my first records. The IPod equivalent in the seventies was a little square suitcase - mine was covered in orange vinyl - that held a record player and a tinny sounding speaker. You could plug it in on a porch or a stoop and play the latest 45's on it. The Jackson Five was still together, and the records were still plastered with that awkward looking blue Motown label that would make you dizzy if you tried to follow it around the turntable as it spun at 45 rpms.

    The black adapter for the 45 sized records was easily lost, which meant all of your records had the little blue, green, orange or yellow inserts snapped into the hole in the middle so you could play them over and over.

    The Jackson brothers looked like new money whenever you saw them on TV, their afros freshly barbered, their dance moves crisp, their voices strong and earnest. They were the pretty, camera ready incarnation of James Brown's gritty anthem "Say It Loud (I'm Black And I'm Proud)".

    The tone of baby brother Michael's voice matched your own prepubescent screeches as you tried to sing along.



      "Let's dance, let's shout,

      shake your body

      down to the ground..."




    You listened to "Shake Your Body" on your Sony Walkman, or the K-Mart knockoff from Korea that replaced it after you'd dropped it enough times, but you told everybody it was a Run-DMC remix. The Jackson Five had gone minimalist, jettisoning the Five because the original name belonged to their old boss Berry Gordy.

    They left their brother Jermaine behind at Motown too, because he was married to their old bosses daughter. It took a little more makeup to keep those child growing into man faces baby smooth, but the dance steps were as crisp as ever.

    You'd moved on too - the record player was now a boom box, and you'd had to learn new skills - namely, how to take a pencil and stick it into one of the spindles in the cassette case to take the slack out of the magnetic tape whenever it was spooled too loosely because you had rewound it back to the beginning of the same song over and over.


      "Come on and groove,

      let the magic in the music

      get to you,

      'cause you're not bad at all..."



    It was almost like magic when the radio DJ played "Off The Wall "on your mother's car radio, repeating the last song played at the dance your mother was picking you up from. The otherworldy sound effects heightened your memory of the girls you finally convinced to get on the dance floor with you, magnifying their budding curves and allowing you to read more into their sparkling eyes than they ever intended. Michael had gone from front man to the man. The era of music videos meant the singer could divorce himself, figuratively and literally, from the band.

    You'd had to learn to begin to do the same thing - to begin to emerge from the pack, to begin to decide to do things that were different from what everybody else wanted.


      "People always told me,

      be careful what you do,

      don't go around

      breaking young girls' hearts..."



    Maybe it was the influence of rap music, maybe it was the improved sound systems in family sedans - whatever it was, the bass driven "Billie Jean" helped Michael elbow his skinny self back in amongst the pack for the newly licensed drivers, who had finally earned the right and the privacy during solo drives to play what they wanted. If you were cool, you sported the Member's Only jacket. The hopeless faithful didn't waste any time shucking and jiving with any imitations - they went straight for the jugular, buying exact replicas of the Gloved One's video attire.

    In fierce competition with beatboxing and break dancing for our attention, Michael held his own. But we were growing goatees and mustaches now. And some of us, too many of us, had had to start dealing, waaay waaay too early with the fact that the kid was our son.

    His Highness's face was changing too, though, but not like ours. It was still baby smooth, with new cheekbones.


      "The way you make me feel,

      you really turn me on,

      you knock me off of my feet,

      baby,

      My lonely days are gone..."




    Moonwalker Number One been gone so long MJ didn't just mean "Michael Jackson" anymore. But the premiere of his "The Way You Make Me Feel" video was still enough of an event that jaded college students stopped what they were doing to check him out. Still suburban-centric, but newly afro-inspired, we speculated as the wind whipped through his hair on the screen about the how and the why of the new nose, the new skin tone, the lack of hipbone.

    Even though we'd gotten better at the love chase, a little help from the music man never hurt.

    In that video, it looked like Michael was in a new place, out in the desert, shorn of all but the most ethereal wisp of a shirt and Peter Pan pants, ready to spread his wings to figuratively fly away.

    So were we.




    I couldn't have recorded the tidbits I've shared above any better if I kept a diary. No matter how bizarre and twisted things may have gotten for Michael Jackson in his later years, it's these moments, these slices of time in my life that have been indelibly marked by his music.


    This date in history... Strange Things! ( Just a little info, no rants or vulgarities about the "SEBI' Soul Eating Bastard Industry (aka: Health Insurance Companies))


    On this date in 1284, it was said that the PIED PIPER of Hamelin, Germany lured 130 children out of town, and they were never seen again. On June 26, 1974, supermarket SCANNING of UPC codes began with a pack of chewing gum in Troy, Ohio.

    That's it for now but I have been collecting info on this heartless tatic of Post Claim Underwriting, and why this is the best arguement for a Public Option in the new health care reform bill. So the rants will continue soon, I promise.

    How About Some K-Y With Your Health Insurance Coverage ... (..if you can afford insurance that is...)




    For your general information . . .




     

    Testimony of Wendell Potter Philadelphia, PA

     

    Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation

     

    June 24, 2009



    Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to be here this afternoon.


    My name is Wendell Potter and for 20 years, I worked as a senior executive at health insurance companies, and I saw how they confuse their customers and dump the sick - all so they can satisfy their Wall Street investors.

     

    I know from personal experience that members of Congress and the public have good reason to question the honesty and trustworthiness of the insurance industry. Insurers make promises they have no intention of keeping, they flout regulations designed to protect consumers, and they make it nearly impossible to understand--or even to obtain--information we need. As you hold hearings and discuss legislative proposals over the coming weeks, I encourage you to look very closely at the role for-profit insurance companies play in making our health care system both the most expensive and one of the most dysfunctional in the world. I hope you get a real sense of what life would be like for most of us if the kind of so-called reform the insurers are lobbying for is enacted.

     

    When I left my job as head of corporate communications for one of the country's largest insurers, I did not intend to go public as a former insider. However, it recently became abundantly clear to me that the industry's charm offensive--which is the most visible part of duplicitous and well-financed PR and lobbying campaigns--may well shape reform in a way that benefits Wall Street far more than average Americans.

     

    A few months after I joined the health insurer CIGNA Corp. in 1993, just as the last national health care reform debate was underway, the president of CIGNA's health care division was one of three industry executives who came here to assure members of Congress that they would help lawmakers pass meaningful reform. While they expressed concerns about some of President Clinton's proposals, they said they enthusiastically supported several specific goals.

     

    Those goals included covering all Americans; eliminating underwriting practices like pre-existing condition exclusions and cherry-picking; the use of community rating; and the creation of a standard benefit plan. Had the industry followed through on its commitment to those goals, I wouldn't be here today.

     

    Today we are hearing industry executives saying the same things and making the same assurances. This time, though, the industry is bigger, richer and stronger, and it has a much tighter grip on our health care system than ever before. In the 15 years since insurance companies killed the Clinton plan, the industry has consolidated to the point that it is now dominated by a cartel of large for-profit insurers.

     

    The average family doesn't understand how Wall Street's dictates determine whether they will be offered coverage, whether they can keep it, and how much they'll be charged for it. But, in fact, Wall Street plays a powerful role. The top priority of for-profit companies is to drive up the value of their stock. Stocks fluctuate based on companies' quarterly reports, which are discussed every three months in conference calls with investors and analysts. On these calls, Wall Street looks investors and analysts look for two key figures: earnings per share and the medical-loss ratio, or medical ―benefit‖ ratio, as the industry now terms it. That is the ratio between what the company actually pays out in claims and what it has left over to cover sales, marketing, underwriting and other administrative expenses and, of course, profits.

     

    To win the favor of powerful analysts, for-profit insurers must prove that they made more money during the previous quarter than a year earlier and that the portion of the premium going to medical costs is falling. Even very profitable companies can see sharp declines in stock prices moments after admitting they've failed to trim medical costs. I have seen an insurer's stock price fall 20 percent or more in a single day after executives disclosed that the company had to spend a slightly higher percentage of premiums on medical claims during the quarter than it did during a previous period. The smoking gun was the company's first-quarter medical loss ratio, which had increased from 77.9% to 79.4% a year later

    .

    To help meet Wall Street's relentless profit expectations, insurers routinely dump policyholders who are less profitable or who get sick. Insurers have several ways to cull the sick from their rolls. One is policy rescission. They look carefully to see if a sick policyholder may have omitted a minor illness, a pre-existing condition, when applying for coverage, and then they use that as justification to cancel the policy, even if the enrollee has never missed a premium payment. Asked directly about this practice just last week in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, executives of three of the nation's largest health insurers refused to end the practice of cancelling policies for sick enrollees. Why? Because dumping a small number of enrollees can have a big effect on the bottom line. Ten percent of the population accounts for two-thirds of all health care spending.(1) The Energy and Commerce Committee's investigation into three insurers found that they canceled the coverage of roughly 20,000 people in a five-year period, allowing the companies to avoid paying $300 million in claims.

     


    They also dump small businesses whose employees' medical claims exceed what insurance underwriters expected. All it takes is one illness or accident among employees at a small business to prompt an insurance company to hike the next year's premiums so high that the employer has to cut benefits, shop for another carrier, or stop offering coverage altogether - leaving workers uninsured. The practice is known in the industry as ―purging. The purging of less profitable accounts through intentionally unrealistic rate increases helps explain why the number of small businesses offering coverage to their employees has fallen from 61 percent to 38 percent since 1993, according to the National Small Business Association. Once an insurer purges a business, there are often no other viable choices in the health insurance market because of rampant industry consolidation.

     

    An account purge so eye-popping that it caught the attention of reporters occurred in October 2006 when CIGNA notified the Entertainment Industry Group Insurance Trust that many of the Trust's members in California and New Jersey would have to pay more than some of them earned in a year if they wanted to continue their coverage. The rate increase CIGNA planned to implement, according to USA Today, would have meant that some family-plan premiums would exceed $44,000 a year. CIGNA gave the enrollees less than three months to pay the new premiums or go elsewhere.

     

    Purging through pricing games is not limited to letting go of an isolated number of unprofitable accounts. It is endemic in the industry. For instance, between 1996 and 1999, Aetna initiated a series of company acquisitions and became the nation's largest health insurer with 21 million members. The company spent more than $20 million that it received in fees and premiums from customers to revamp its computer systems, enabling the company to ―identify and dump unprofitable corporate accounts, as The Wall Street Journal reported in 2004.(2)


    Armed with a stockpile of new information on policyholders, new management and a shift in strategy, in 2000, Aetna sharply raised premiums on less profitable accounts. Within a few years, Aetna lost 8 million covered lives due to strategic and other factors.


    While strategically initiating these cost hikes, insurers have professed to be the victims of rising health costs while taking no responsibility for their share of America's health care affordability crisis. Yet, all the while, health-plan operating margins have increased as sick people are forced to scramble for insurance.

     

    Unless required by state law, insurers often refuse to tell customers how much of their premiums are actually being paid out in claims. A Houston employer could not get that information until the Texas legislature passed a law a few years ago requiring insurers to disclose it. That Houston employer discovered that its insurer was demanding a 22 percent rate increase in 2006 even though it had paid out only 9 percent of the employer's premium dollars for care the year before.

     

    It's little wonder that insurers try to hide information like that from its customers. Many people fall victim to these industry tactics, but the Houston employer might have known better - it was the Harris County Medical Society, the county doctors' association.

     

    A study conducted last year by Pricewaterhouse Coopers revealed just how successful the insurers' expense management and purging actions have been over the last decade in meeting Wall Street's expectations. The accounting firm found that the collective medical-loss ratios of the seven largest for-profit insurers fell from an average of 85.3 percent in 1998 to 81.6 percent in 2008. That translates into a difference of several billion dollars in favor of insurance company shareholders and executives and at the expense of health care providers and their patients.


    There are many ways insurers keep their customers in the dark and purposely mislead them - especially now that insurers have started to aggressively market health plans that charge relatively low premiums for a new brand of policies that often offer only the illusion of comprehensive coverage.


    An estimated 25 million Americans are now underinsured for two principle reasons. First, the high deductible plans many of them have been forced to accept - like I was forced to accept at CIGNA - require them to pay more out of their own pockets for medical care, whether they can afford it or not. The trend toward these high-deductible plans alarms many health care experts and state insurance commissioners. As California Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi told the Associated Press in 2005 when he was serving as the state's insurance commissioner, the movement toward consumer-driven coverage will eventually result in a ―death spiral‖ for managed care plans. This will happen, he said, as consumer-driven plans ―cherry-pick‖ the youngest, healthiest and richest customers while forcing managed care plans to charge more to cover the sickest patients. The result, he predicted, will be more uninsured people.


    In selling consumer-driven plans, insurers often try to persuade employers to go ―full replacement,‖ which means forcing all of their employees out of their current plans and into a consumer-driven plan. At least two of the biggest insurers have done just that, to the dismay of many employees who would have preferred to stay in their HMOs and PPOs. Those options were abruptly taken away from them.


    Secondly, the number of uninsured people has increased as more have fallen victim to deceptive marketing practices and bought what essentially is fake insurance. The industry is insistent on being able to retain so-called ―benefit design flexibility so they can continue to market these kinds of often worthless policies. The big insurers have spent millions acquiring companies that specialize in what they call ―limited-benefit‖ plans. An example of such a plan is marketed by one of the big insurers under the name of Starbridge Select. Not only are the benefits extremely limited but the underwriting criteria established by the insurer essentially guarantee big profits. Pre-existing conditions are not covered during the first six months, and the employer must have an annual employee turnover rate of 70 percent or more, so most of the workers don't even stay on the payroll long enough to use their benefits. The average age of employees must not be higher than 40, and no more than 65 percent of the workforce can be female. Employers don't pay any of the premiums--the employees pay for everything. As Consumer Reports noted in May, many people who buy limited-benefit policies, which often provide little or no hospitalization, are misled by marketing materials and think they are buying more comprehensive care. In many cases it is not until they actually try to use the policies that they find out they will get little help from the insurer in paying the bills.

     

    The lack of candor and transparency is not limited to sales and marketing. Notices that insurers are required to send to policyholders--those explanation-of-benefit documents that are supposed to explain how the insurance company calculated its payments to providers and how much is left for the policyholder to pay--are notoriously incomprehensible. Insurers know that policyholders are so baffled by those notices they usually just ignore them or throw them away. And that's exactly the point. If they were more understandable, more consumers might realize that they are being ripped off.

     

    Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for beginning this conversation on transparency and for making this such a priority. S. 1050, your legislation to require insurance companies to be more honest and transparent in how they communicate with consumers, is essential. So, too, is S. 1278, the Consumers Choice Health Plan, which would create a strong public health insurance option as a benchmark in transparency and quality. Americans need and overwhelmingly support the option of obtaining coverage from a public plan. The industry and its backers are using fear tactics, as they did in 1994, to tar a transparent, publicly-accountable health care option as a ―government-run system. But what we have today, Mr. Chairman, is a Wall Street-run system that has proven itself an untrustworthy partner to its customers, to the doctors and hospitals who deliver care, and to the state and federal governments that attempt to regulate it.


    _____________________


    1 Samuel Zuvekas and Joel Cohen, "Prescription Drugs And The Changing Concentration Of Health Care Expenditures," Health Affairs, 26 (1) (January/February 2007): 249-257.


    2 "Behind Aetna's Turnaround: Small Steps to Pare Cost of Care," Wall Street Journal, August 13, 2004.




    -----end----


    ezra-klein/Potter_Commerce_Committee_written_testimony_2020090624-FINAL.pdf


    ~OGD~


    Forget Iran - Michael Jackson is dead!


    That's what all news channels feel like tonight. Absolutely no one cares about anything else.

    Yesterday, it was all about the brave Iranian reformers, today - screw them, let's talk nonstop about Michael Jackson. Better yet, let's all watch the same old clips over and over.

    OK, Jackson was a big star, in his own league, talented but weird, and everyone is naturally sad that he passed on. It's a big story, partly because his death was very sudden.

    But, come on, what the heck, where the rest of today's news? Something! Anything? No, I'm asking for too much.

    Update: Oh, wait, no, I was wrong. There is one other news item today: Farrah Fawcett is also dead. It's like I've got three identical People channels today.

    Health Care for All - It works great here in Canada


    Something Americans needs to know...

    ...You desperately need a Canadian-style health care system.

    "To summarize the solution: America must replace it's military-industrial complex with a medical-industrial complex."


    The USA has almost 50 million people with no health care plan. Millions more have "plans" that will put them into bankruptcy when they have a major illness or injury.  When compared to all other Western democracies America's system is a dismal failure and a painful embarrassment.

    Highlights of Canadian Health Care:

    1. Health care is mandatory and very affordable. The most expensive rate is $108 for a family of three or more.

    2. Every person has equal access and full access to health care, regardless of ability to pay or pre-existing conditions.

    3. Everybody has the exact same all-inclusive plan.

    4. You can see any doctor, any hospital, any time, and leave your money at home.

    5. Medical bills such as hospital bills and doctor bills are unheard of in Canada..

    6. Free surgerys and hospitalization.

    7. Free doctor visits, including specialist appointments.

    8. All "tests" ordered by a doctor are free, including x-rays, Cat scans, lab tests, ultrasound, cardiac stress tests, etc, etc.

    9. No deductibles or co-pays are allowed.

    10. All healthcare workers and doctors are well paid, and they enjoy the many benefits of being labor union members.

    11. Canada has a simple single-payer system. All bills are sent to the government, and not to patients.

    12. Canada's system encourages people to open businesses and become entrepreneurs, because they don't have to worry about having employer-based health policies.

    What price will America have to pay for a Canadian-style healthcare system?

    The truth is that America does not really have to pay anything. It is just a simple matter of changing federal budget priorities. To summarize the solution: America must replace it's military-industrial complex with a medical-industrial complex.

    In my home province of British Columbia, Canada,  almost 50% of the budget goes to health and social services. We have a huge social safety net in addition to our great healthcare system. What few military bases we have are essentially Coast Guard like search and rescue stations.

    Overall, Canada spends only about 5% of it's budget on defense. Compare that to America where the military and the Veterans Administration eat up about 50% of the budget. America must stop it's endless wars, and start taking care of it's own citizens.

    Canada's system is good for the economy and tax rates


    If you think that a generous health care system will hurt the economy - think again. Canada has the most stable economy of the G-20 nations. Putting people ahead of imperialism has been a win-win formula for success in Canada.

    Many people mistakenly believe that Canada has exceptionally high taxes. Canadian tax rates are comparable to, or lower than American taxes. And there is no question that us Canadians get more bang for our buck thanks to the great health care and social programs.


    Note:  The author has worked as a healthcare provider (Diagnostic Imaging) for over 30 years, including several years working in the USA.

    right wing commentators definition: truth


    Whatever we say it is.

    Michael Jackson: Such Aching Loneliness


    Michael Jackson's passing fills me with sadness - he always seemed a tragic figure to me. His talent was colossal, almost overwhelming to consider.

    A couple months ago, I was surfing the web and came across the video below, and watching it, and knowing what I knew about his [lack of a] childhood, the cruelty of his father, the distortions that early superstardom imposed on his personality, and so on  -- I found the video almost impossibly moving.

    Maybe it is just that I know the story of his life, but as I watched him sing this song, I got a glimpse at a frightened, lonely, bewildered child, aching in vain for the kind of friend he was rhapsodizing about in this song. I didn't know him personally of course, but I got the sense that he lived (and died, now) carrying an immense burden of harrowing pain and isolation.

    This country can be cruel indeed to its idols.

    I hope he has found some peace.

    The Video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSqo17o2a1w

    Michael Savage backs down ... again


    Faithful readers -- both of you -- will recall that I recently wrote about radio blowhard Michael Savage's threat to the folks at Media Matters for America and other of his critics to post on his Web site their pictures and other "pertinent" information.

    I suggested he wouldn't do it, mainly because of the legal implications if one of his knuckle-dragging listeners decided to exact some revenge.

    Anyway, tonight on his program, Savage did indeed back down. Instead, he announced, he has "unknown" people looking into the tax returns of Media Matters, which will then, I guess be posted on his site.

    That'll show 'em.

    But Savage, in the spirit of true disclosure, why not post the tax returns from your Paul Revere Society, and fill us in on the $900,000 that was in its coffers when your group lost its tax-exempt status?

    Yeah. That will happen.

    Keep the faith.

    Sanford Owes Hikers an Apology


    He's apologized to his family. And to his staff, and to the people of his state. 
    Now he owes a big sorry to Appalachian Trail hikers. The 2,000-mile "AT" is America's pilgrimage. Few actually hike its length, but it's on the bucket list for so many American dreamers.

    I do a section every year, and I'm just about on track to reach the peak of Mt, Katahdin when I'm 80 or so. You'll meet the greatest people in the world there (or see no one for days). And you'll encounter yourself. It's the only good, non-evil thing I do. (I work in public relations).

    Now it's become a euphemism for sordid behavior. Sanford's done for hiking the trail what Larry Craig did for airport restrooms. He must be held accountable.

    I'm supposed to ask for a week off for my annual hike, and all I'll get are snickers. Hikers will be making up cover stories, pretending they're going to the shore or something. You'll pass them on mountain paths, and they will avert their eyes. Scoutmasters will start taking kids to Vegas and Atlantic City. This must not stand.

    Settlement in Missouri Lawsuit a Victory for Low-Income Voters


    Cross-posted at Project Vote's Voting Matters Blog

    In a major victory for voting rights, low-income voters in the state of Missouri will finally have better access to voter registration opportunities, thanks to a lawsuit settlement announced today by Project Vote, Demos, and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

    Read more »

    Chamber of Commerce vs. Labor Unions: Guess who Wins?


    Labor is the great producer of wealth: it moves all other causes.
    Congressman Daniel Webster, 4/2/1824

    With all their faults, trade unions have done more for humanity than any other organization that ever existed. They have done more for decency, for honesty, for education, for the betterment of the race, for the developing of character in man, than the other association of men.
    Clarence Darrow, The Railroad Trainman, 1909

    Without labor nothing prospers.
    Popular banner

    The history of America has been largely created by the deeds of its working people and their organizations. Nor has this contribution been confined to raising wages and bettering work conditions; it has been fundamental to almost every effort to extend and strengthen our democracy.
    William Cahn, labor authority and historian

    We insist that labor is entitled to as much respect as property. But our workers with hand and brain deserve more than respect for their labor. They deserve practical protection in the opportunity to use their labor at a return adequate to support them at a decent and constantly rising standard of living, and to accumulate a margin of security against the inevitable vicissitudes of life.
    President Franklin D. Roosevelt, fireside chat, 1936


    If I were a worker in a factory, the first thing I would do would be to join a union.
    President Franklin D. Roosevelt

    The first thing a dictator does is abolish the free press. Next he abolishes the right of labor to go on strike. Strikes have been labor's weapon of progress in the century of our industrial civilization. Where the strike has been abolished ... labor is reduced to a state of medieval peonage, the standard of living lowered, the nation falls to subsistence level.
    George Seldes, Freedom of the Press, 1935

    The right to join a union of one's choice is unquestioned today and is sanctioned and protected by law.
    President Harry S. Truman

    Only a fool would try to deprive working men and women of the right to join the union of their choice.
    President Dwight Eisenhower (1953-1961), general and Allied Supreme Commander in World War II

    There's s a direct relationship between the ballot box and the bread box, and what the union fights for and wins at the bargaining table can be taken away in the legislative halls.
    Walter Reuther

    In light of this fundamental structure of all work... in light of the fact that, labor and capital are indispensable in any social system ... it is clear that even if it is because of production in any social system ... it is clear that even if it is because of their work needs that people unite to secure their rights, their union remains a constructive factor of social order and solidarity, and it is impossible to ignore it.
    Pope John Paul II

    The history of the labor movements needs to be taught in every school in this land. America is a living testimonial to what free men and women, organized in free democratic trade unions can do to make a better life. ... We ought to be proud of it!
    Vice President Hubert Horatio Humphrey, Jr. (1865-1969), Lyndon Johnson Administration

    Our labor unions are not narrow, self-seeking groups. They have raised wages, shortened hours, and provided supplemental benefits. Through collective bargaining and grievance procedures, they have brought justice and democracy to the shop floor.
    President John F. Kennedy, 1962

    The AFL-CIO has done more good for more people than any (other) group in America in its legislative efforts. It doesn't just try to do something about wages and hours for its own people. No group in the country works harder in the interests of everyone.
    President Lyndon Johnson, 1965


    (Above courtesy of the American Labor Studies Center.)


    The EFCA is an attempt to radically overhaul our labor law system in the favor of union organizers. EFCA is a power grab by union bosses who seek to inflate union membership by skewing the careful balance that is designed within our labor law system.
    NAM (National Assoc. of Manufacturers) Talking Points against EFCA

    _____________________________________

    Nobody should be surprised that business organizations like the Chamber of Commerce , The National Right to Work Committee and the National Association of Manufacturers are looking out for themselves. The whole purpose of organizing is to build up membership, and thus the funding, to promote their own common welfare.

    Labor unions are in business for the same reasons. There have always been labor or trade organizations where workers could gather in order to protect their livelihoods (and, in some cases, their lives.)

    In the days before industrialization, there were guilds, alliances and brotherhoods. In every workplace, then and now, employers and employees had relationships that could best be described as contentious. Neither side has ever trusted the other. Every day in every way self-interest reigns supreme.

    Often, as is the case with many relationships, the differences become irreconcilable. In the case of workplace irreconcilable differences, management prefers to call that "cause for dismissal" and considers it their duty to put an end to it.

    Every now and then, in an all-too-rare but slightly enlightened environment, a stab at "concessions" is made. But even then, going in, it's a pretty safe bet that management will come out ahead 100% of the time.

    Even the most labor-supportive of us can understand the reasons behind the statement above. The difference between labor and management--the main, the very ultimate difference--is that management holds all the cards. They don't have to do any of the things labor comes up with. Not unless they're forced to by some ridiculously tight-assed government agency. (Which, luckily for them, they haven't had to confront for ages now.)

    Whole cities of people, especially in the South, think they understand the need to keep labor from gaining even an inch. Unbelievably , many of those naysayers and saboteurs are laborers themselves. Somehow they've been convinced that the way to success is to keep management happy at any cost. (It's an odd spectacle when workers cut off their noses to spite their faces. They look really, really foolish.)

    Their motto: Never complain, always explain, give hosannas to the highest for your crummy workplace and your measly paycheck. And if you really want to keep management happy, get behind them in every skirmish, whenever unions rear their pushy little heads.

    They'll chant, "I hate unions". They'll march against them and connive with management to keep them out. They'll even repeat management's talking points, as if they're their own:

    1. Unions make workers lazy. They can get away with murder if there's a union behind them.

    2. Unions try to bleed their nice company dry with "demands" for high wages and decent benefits.

    3. Unions "demand" safe workplaces. All those regulations cause no amount of grief for the Lords of the Manor.

    4. Unions "force" their will upon workers.

    5. Unions are evil because, well, because they're UNIONS .


    So I wonder--what is it going to take to convince the un-organized laborers of this country that it isn't the unions that are holding them back. One look at our history shows that we were stronger and healthier as a nation when the unions were stronger and healthier. There is no

    denying that, no matter who does the denying.

    This is an argument that has gone on and on and on. I'm always shocked when I see how many workers have bought into the lie that unions will destroy our society. One brief memory of the past couple of decades, one look at the sorry state of employment today should be enough to convince even the harshest critics and the densest of dolts that the Chamber of Commerce, NAM, and every other group or politician who spends considerable amounts of time pretending that unions are evil are not now, and never have been, our BFFs.

    Ramona

    (cross-posted at Ramona's Voices here)

    Chucktown Paranoia


    Despite wearing the female equivalent of the Charleston tuxedo (blue gabardine blazer, crisp white shirt, charcoal grey pencil skirt, sedate pumps), this frisson of paranoia swept over me this morning as I imagined the Republicans at Hazel Parker Playground (a local dog park)  Googling "Sanford +mile-high club" and putting two and two together by comparing the picture of Molly dog and my Whiggish ways.

    Not that I think that Rainbow Row Republicans hang out in TPM Cafe or anything.

    So I ventured back into Second Life and snapped a picture of myself standing in a friend's parlor.

    Now I feel anonymous in Chucktown. 

    So...What Happens to All Those Beatle Songs?


    Farrah and Michael all in one day. 


    Health Care for All Report : Increase in cost of insurance as share of median income from 2006 to 2016


    For your general information . . .



    From: Health Care For America Now!


    June 23rd, 2009

    Skyrocketing premiums and out-of-pocket medical costs are battering family budgets, eroding U.S. competitiveness in the global economy and threatening the American standard of living, once the envy of the world. As President Barack Obama and his economic advisers have repeatedly said, health costs are increasing at an unsustainable rate, and the national economy will not thrive unless they are reined in. Health care reform that guarantees quality, affordable care for everyone in the United States -- and offers the choice of a public health insurance plan -- can do what our private health insurance system has failed to do: provide economic security for families and the nation. read more



    Health Insurance: Unaffordable Now, And Destined To Get Much Worse

    Mouse over each state to see the percentage of median income absorbed by employer-sponsored insurance in 2006, and what that percentage would be in 2016 without a change in policy.

    Click a state and the document icon to get the full report.

    Increase in cost of insurance
    as share of median income,
    from 2006 to 2016

         70% and lower (turquoise)
         71% to 85%
         86% to 100%
         101% to 115%
         115% or higher (black)



    ~OGD~

    Which lying liar are we supposed to believe?


    Kenneth Lewis of (now) Bank of America told Darrel Issa's Congressional committee a couple weeks ago that Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke pressured him not to back out of the Merril Lynch acquisition deal.  He claims they threatened him that if he backed out after discovering that Merril's books showed insanely high losses, they would replace him as CEO.

    Bernanke told the committee that while he was "concerned" that Lewis wishing to invoke a MAC clause, Or Material Adverse Change clause, would spell trouble. Backing out would send shock waves through the financial system, but they, of course never threatened him.

    According to a recent Frontline story, Lewis had a second-fiddle complex; he was not an heir to the financial oligarchy, and when he was in a position to buyout Merril, he pounced.  He would, heretofore, be the Biggest Banker in the U.S.  It is unclear whether or not his people exercised due diligence in scouting their books.  When he did find the horrifying balance sheet, he "neglected" to tell his shareholders, who signed off on the merger at his request. He now claims he was instructed to not mention this info to his board and shareholders.

    According to investigative reporters, all nine bank heads who were called in to the Big Financial Meltdown meeting with the Fed and Head of Treasury, were essentailly told they would accept x-billion in TARP money, or there would be leaks about the viability of their institutions.  Apparently, all the banks would need to take the money in order to hide the fact that some actually needed recapitalization;  and to prevent more Bear Stearns-ish collapses.  (As soon as Wall Street heard Bear took government money, their stock tanked, and tanked some more, until they failed.) 

    Bernanke's voice during his testimony was shakey at times.  I wish lying experts could have weighed in on his eye shifts and voice warbles; the same for Lewis's testimony.  Bernake also maintained that the Fed and Treasury "did all we could legally do" to save Lehman Brothers, but "there were just no takers" for an acquisition there, nor any TARP money yet.  We all know of the fierce competition between Paulson at Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers; many people have claimed that is essentially why Lehman was allowed to fail.

    Why didn't Mr. Financial Wizard Lewis discover what was on Merril's books?  Did Bernanke not give him enough time, or was he too eager to become King of the Banks?  Did he think the billions in guarantees the Fed offered him were enough at first glance, then reconsider?  And what, exactly, does he want now? 

    Which of them do we believe?  And most importantly, what lessons do we learn?  That we have zero influence over any of it.  Obama's financial team is just like Bush's financial team at the top.  The main person I have confidence in is Elizabeth Warren, head of the TARP watchdog committee.  She has constantly complained that her staff is too minimal, and that there is simply no transparency whatsoever.  So she skirmishes constantly with the Fed. 

    Sheila Bair, head of the FDIC, has some mettle, also, and has done some truth-telling here and there.  I am enough of a feminist to enjoy that it is two women who seem to have the most balls in speaking truth-to-power in this whole financial debacle.

    And I agree with Ron Paul (but for different reasons):  INVESTIGATE THE FED.

    And don't dick around with cutesy re-regulation, and not just fluff about consumer credit wah-wah. Congress needs a Pecora-like commission to explore all that went wrong, and put in place some meanigful reform.  Yep, it's closing the barn door after the horse has bolted, but maybe some regs will help to prevent the next bubble-burst cycle for awhile.

    Obama's Ambiguous Relationship with the Queer Community


    After days of speculating and the White House has confirmed on that on Monday June 29th, the President will host a Pride Reception in the White House; and has invited a several prominent leaders from the queer-community to attend the event, as well as families with gay parents, and other Queer-Americans in celebration of the Stonewall Riots. The White House also confirms that the President plans to attend the event.

    All of this is a very welcomed symbolic gesture by the President and his administration to what has been nothing short of a tremendously rocky relationship with the queer--community since the President took office in January, in fact since he announced Rev. Rick Warren would be speaking at his inauguration last year. However, is it "too little, too late" to repair the damage that was done?

    It has been difficult to discern how supportive of an ally the President wants to be, as we have been receiving nothing but mix signals from him and his administration. Like Americans general support for the President and his policies, there is a stark difference between the two for Queer-Americans.

    At the rhetoric end of things the President has maintained his stance that he is committed to fulfilling his campaign process, and displayed public supportive for Queer-Americans, such as declaring June LGBT Pride Month, inviting gay-families to the annual White House egg hunt, and saying that he maintained committing to repealing both the Defense of Marriage Act and the controversial Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

    However, on the policy end things have been quite difference, which has fueled the hostilities, that are only now showing signs of cooling down. While many debate whether or not the President should have defended the DOMA case, all generally agree that the rhetoric used to defend the law was not becoming of a supportive ally. The President has also gotten some heat from progressives and queer-advocates because he has yet to make a substantial move on Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and deflected responsibility on that issue to Congress.

    There are now signs that things are changing, both the policy and rhetorical end; and it could not have come any sooner for Democrats, who were losing important donors for the annual fundraiser. The President has expanded some rights to federally employed same-sex couples (though not as much as many had hoped for or initially thought), expanded some benefits to Trans-Americans, will allow married same-sex couples to carry their married name on their passports, called on Congress to pass legislation to repeal the DOMA.

    While many have simplified the President's actions to him primarily trying to stay in good favor with a loyal voting and donating block of the Democratic Party, which surely played some part of the political calculation, these changes still represent a significant step forward for Queer-Americans.

    When the President signed the executive memorandum last week Wednesday expanding some rights to federally employed same-sex couples, he made his desire known that he wants Congress to provide him with the legislation on DOMA (and presumably DADT as well) sooner rather than later. It was that part of the ceremony that most observers were closely watching.

    Until that point other than simply reaffirming his commitment to the Queer community--which at that point had become rather trite--the President had not publicly said anything directed at the Congress to send him legislation on gay-rights to sign. The President's silence was a fact that many contributed to the snail like pace the current legislation in the Congress has making its way through the House and to the Senate, such as Rep. Ellen Tauscher bill, the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, which would repeal the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.

    The President remains a polarizing figure in the Queer community. His ambiguousness as to how supportive of an ally he considers himself, and how that translates to getting through the necessary legislation, has left many befuddled and confused. While he is the most queer-friendly President for any president that has had to deal with the gay-issue his track record is marred with policy and political decisions that have angered and frustrated many.

    While the President has yet to strike out, he is coming up from behind. Monday's Pride Reception will likely be an important opportunity for the President to reset his relationship with the queer community if he handles it well. If he simply treats the event as nothing more than a political photo opt, he is likely to get berated by many as trying to procrastinate even further; however, if he can lay the foundation for the road ahead he just maybe might have done the impossible yet again.

    On being the envy of the world


    The title of Ellis Cose's book, Envy of the World, taken from the pen of Toni Morrison and the from the mouth of her protagonist Sula resurfaced in my memory after I clicked the link--provided of course by TPM -- to Politico's story about Obama. It resurfaced because I remember reading Sula the book as the character was telling Nell, her best friend and a man name Jude, a small story about black men being the envy of the world. I remember this part of the book because it was ridiculous. Ridiculous in only the way Sula is/was telling this story to Nell and Jude. Sula is telling this tall tale because Jude is complaining about being a black man in this world. I understood his complaints. Lord, do I know his complaints. Sula was trying to illustrate to Jude that black men were the envy of the world because we are either greatly admired or feared; and sometimes admired and feared at the same time. There usually isn't a middle ground and it is maddening.


    INTO THE BERESHIT: The Search for Nuclear Power


    Why take the time for bible studies?

    Well for me it is easy, I have no life. But for others who do have a life, think about this:

    A 2005 poll suggested that 63% of Americans believe that every line in the bible is true. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43957

    Americans' views on the Bible have not changed materially over the past 16 years. Gallup has asked this question about personal views of the Bible nine times since 1991. The percentage saying the Bible is the actual, literal word of God has remained in a relatively narrow range between 27% and 35% across this time period, with the average being 31%.

    Prior to that point, however, the data suggest that Americans' belief in a literal Bible was slightly higher. Gallup asked the question seven times between 1976 and 1984, during which time an average of 38% said that the Bible is the actual word of God. At two points during this time period, 40% of Americans agreed with the literal interpretation view of the Bible. http://www.gallup.com/poll/27682/onethird-americans-believe-bible-literally-true.aspx

    And let us not forget the Fred Flintstone Museums. http://creationmuseum.org/whats-here/exhibits/

    First, I guess I would like to know how many Americans even know what the word 'literal' means. I mean have you seen some of those 'man on the street' interviews by Leno? A lot of idiots out there.

    Second, I would like to know how many Americans have actually read Bereshit...I mean the entire Book.

    Third, what is the exact percentage of Americans residing in mental institutions? It seems to me that this figure might be easily cross checked with the other polls.

    We should be frightened by these polls. Remember, all but three repubs during the early debates in 2008 stated that they did not believe in evolution.  And most of these gentlemen went to college and everything.

    Chapter Two of Bereshit begins with a recap:

    Thus the heavens and the earth and all their array were completed (G ch2, V 1)

    Whew. That was a lot of work.

    At least the second chapter of Bereshit begins with some consistency. God took a nap and rested after his six day workweek and declared the seventh day to be a day of rest.

    Now for our Jewish friends, the Sabbath would be Saturday.  For the Christians that would be Sunday. For the Muslims that would be Friday. Some quasi-Christian sects even chose Thursday for their Sabbath--I assume because the other religions had already taken the weekend.

    I do not recall any controversies in my youth concerning Thursday Closing Laws.

    I would underline here that these religions are in basic agreement with the chronology described in Bereshit through Abraham--and that makes this entire analysis scarier for anyone that hopes for some sort of advancement in Human Knowledge.

    But the actual Sabbath day and the differences between the religions in recognizing what the proper day should be to recognize the majesty of the Creator, should not be an issue.

    Man is always getting his calendar screwed up anyway. I figure it's much like our daylight savings time or problems with the Gregorian Calendar.

    I mean, the Russians actually celebrated the Octobrist Revolution on November 3rd. I mean who is counting anyway?

    A more important point is that the bible, written by the actual pen of God, would have us believe that the entire planet earth was somehow created in six days. But it gets worse, The sun, our planetary partners in this solar system, another 100-200 billion solar systems (every sun in the Milky Way is a solar system by the by, they all have something orbiting them) in our Milky Way (depending upon your sources) as well as another 100 billion galaxies were supposedly created in only three days.

    Our entire known universe was created inside a week's time since God's employment contract provided for a day off for good behavior. At least He thought it was goooooood.

    But one problem remains. If light travels at 186,000 miles per second, and the earth is 6000 years old, we would not have much of a night sky.

    But wait. There appears to be a revision early on in this Book.

    At the time when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens--while as yet there was no field shrub on earth and no grass of the field had sprouted, for the Lord God sent no rain upon the earth and there was no man to till the soil, but a stream was welling up out of the earth and watering the surface of the ground--the Lord God formed man out of the clay of the ground and blew into his nostrils the breath of life and so man became a living being. (Gen. C2, V 5-7)

    Why would Chapter 2 begin with the proposition that the heavens and the earth and their entire array were completed and immediately go into a new description of how man was created?

    According to the chronology contained in Bereshit 1, man had already been created on the sixth day. Now, all of a sudden, we are told that we were created sometime between the third day and the fifth day.  That is, the plants had been created on the third day and Chapter 2 tells us that Adam was created before the first plant sprouted.

    It would appear that Bereshit contains a rather strong contradiction in its first two pages. Be mindful though that there are fundamentalists that are fervent in their belief that there is nothing inconsistent in the first two chapters of this tome.

    Then the Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and he placed there the man whom he had formed. Out of the ground the Lord God made various ress grow that were delightful to look at and good for food, with the three of life in the middle of the garden and the tree of knowledge of good and bad.

    A river rises in Eden to water the garden; beyond these it divides and become four branches.  The name of the first is the Pishon; it is the one that winds through the whole land of Havilah where there is gold. The gold of that land is excellent: bdellium and lapis lazuli are also there, the name name of the second river is Ghun, it is the one that winds all through the land of Cush. The name of the third river is the Tigris; it is the on that flows east of Asshur. The fourth river is the Euphrates. (Gen. C2, V 8-14)


    This is a fun description of Eden. Like Heinrich Schliemann seeking Troy by reading descriptions contained in the Iliad, one biblical archeologist looked at this geographical description to see if he could actually find Eden. He presented his conclusions on the National Geographic Network. It seems that anybody can find the Euphrates and the Tigris by looking at a map of Iraq. After finding the two rivers it was easy to figure out what the Bereshit author was describing the investigator finally concluded that the Garden of Eden actually sits a the site of a present day nuclear power plant:

     

    Pave paradise

    Put up a nuclear power plant

     

    Now 'experts' disagree as to the 'real location' of this ephemeral place. I mean finding heaven is no easy task. I always thought they would someday locate Eden in the same place as Shangri-La.

    Bereshit goes on to having God tell Adam he can eat anything except the fruit from the forbidden tree and God then goes ahead and creates Eve out of Adam's Rib. (Gen. Ch 2, V 21-22) This is recounted in a Tracy /Hepburn flick. Except I think they both end up in law school...er something like that. 

    The forbidden fruit cannot be an apple because they had no apples available in the area and there were isolationist statutes at the time that really put a crimp in the import/export business.

    Chapter three describes how Adam and Eve fall out of favor as a result of taking advice from a snake--I experienced a similar problem in the 1999-2000 market when I took advice from a snake. (Gen. Ch 3, V 8-14)

    But it is the next verse that really warms my heart:

    Because you have done this

    You shall be banned from all the animals

    And from the wild creatures

    On your belly shall you crawl

    And dirt shall you eat

    All the days of your life 

    This is supposed to be God talking to a snake. He is not speaking to Satan, He is speaking to a snake. Why he made a snake that could speak is beyond me.

    Now as far as I can tell, snakes are not banned from all the other animals. I mean they are not good card players like some dogs I have seen, not real mixers so to speak. Oh well...

    The next verse is one that rush's feminazis do not particularly appreciate:

     

    I will intensify the pangs of your childbearing

    In pain shall you bring forth children

    Yet your urge shall be for your husband

    And he shall be your master

     

    Now think about this verse. First it appears to put women in a similar place as some nations in the Middle East.  Second, our fabulous duo did not have sex yet and had no children.  So it would be hard to exacerbate childbearing difficulties, SINCE NOBODY HAS BORE ANY CHILDREN YET.

    But the next lines really demonstrate the best in a loving, caring god:

    Cursed be the ground because of you

    In toil shall you eat its yield

    All the days of your life

    Thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to you

    As you eat the plants of the field

    By the sweat of your face

    Shall you get bread to eat

    Until you return to the ground

    From which you were taken

    For you are dirt

    And to dirt you shall return (Gen. Ch 2, V 17-19)

     

    What a fun deity. As far as Bereshit is concerned, man is nothing but dirt. This theme comes into play later on in this examination. But what a fun view of the universe. What a fun view of humanity. What a fun view of the earth.

    Chapter three finally ends:

    The lord God therefore banished him from the Garden of Eden, to till the ground from which he had been taken. When he expelled man, he settled him east of the Garden of Eden; and he stationed the cherubim and the firey revolving sword to guard the way to the tree of life. (Gen. Ch 2, Verse 24)

    You know, when you look at it this way, Eden begins to look more and more like a nuclear power plant.

    TPM


    All Sandford, all of the time.

    There is a crucial debate going on relative to should there or should there not be a "public option" in a health care reform package.  Given that Congress is pretty much bought and paid for by the medical/pharmaceutical/insurance combine, a public option is probably all we can hope for.

    There is also the story of the great ferment in Iran which could blossom into substantial social change and a number of other globally important stories.

    Yet here at TPM it all Sandford, all of the time. 

    Iraq surges toward grim, lonely 'endgame'


    One good development may emerge from the silly, obnoxiously covered sex scandal surrounding the South Carolina governor and his Argentine paramour: As his home-state newspaper publishes his embarrassing PG-13 puppy-love confessions via email, some may wonder why The State sat on these aching, treacly bon-mots since December.

    And, as TPM Muckraker points out today, they may wonder why the rest of the American media - so sure about terror threats and emerging crises in every two-bit hamlet across the globe - had been so snookered so long. Gov. Mark Sanford was... somewhere with his feet up, writing. He was... bare-ass hiking on the Appalachian Trail. He was... oops... soul-kissing away his career.

    Maybe the media will level with us about their tendency to prop up those in power long after the rest of the country has pinned a clothespin on its collective nose over obvious shortfalls and exposed dastardy. And maybe it'll chat about its tendency to champion specious causes for motives unclear... or, even sinister.

    Read more »

    Bending the News


    I'm struck by the disparity between our media coverage of every detail of the last moments of a dying Iranian girl, tragically killed while protesting an election, while there is no such coverage of the multitude of American soldiers dying in Iraq or Afghanistan brought to the public's attention.  Such coverage is, in fact specifically suppressed.  I had a friend from France, sadly departed from this world now, who in less than perfect English would describe people, other friends of ours, who tended to exaggerate descriptions of events in order to promote their particular agendas.  She would say that so and so:  "bends the news".  This seems to be an apt description for the media coverage we are being exposed to here in the Land of the Free.

    We must remember that in time of war what is said on the enemy's side of the front is always propaganda, and what is said on our side of the front is truth and righteousness, the cause of humanity and a crusade for peace.  Walter Lippmann
     


    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
                                        Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


    Since G.W. Bush involved us in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as his open ended so called War on Terror, (SCWOT), we appear to be involved in perpetual war, and Walter Lippmann's quote above, describes an insidious tendency toward 'bending the news' that itself will have no end.  For some reason I keep thinking of The Matrix.


    Healthcare Industry


    It seems that the healthcare industry is actually manipulating data and using fear tactics to stall a public option, fearing that there absurd profits will slid away against a good national healthcare system, and naturally with the full support of the Republican caucus.

    It's the Hypocricy Stupid


    While I'd like to believe that Democratic public figures are better in their marriages & personal lives than Republicans I doubt that is probably true to any great degree.  What I do believe though is that Republicans have set themselves up for these types of failures because of who they position themselves to be.

    • I believe that Republicans are greater targets for journalist or the general public because of the hypocrisy involved.  If I see a "promise keeper" at a hotel with a young woman I'm probably more likely to find it news worthy than someone who had not made a living by demonizing others moral values and claiming the high road.
    • I also believe that Republicans are more likely to do really stupid things to try to avoid attention again because they don't want to get caught in their hypocrisy; which of course in the end brings much more attention on themselves (example: vanishing for 5 days).
    Please don't take this as a "poor Republican's" post, I'm not the least bit sympathetic because they are complete hypocrits and have and will continue to do this to themselves.  As long as the are the party of the Christian Right and pretty much nothing else this will continue to be the cycle we see.


    Tour of TPM


    I came across this article about five innovative newsrooms on  the Nieman Journalism Lab site.  TPM is first on the list and includes a video tour of the loft.  The article is dated May 22, so apologies if this has been around the cafe before.  I missed it in that case.

    The Lamest Excuse and Your Healthcare


    Are there really Representatives out there saying, "We do not have the votes" and using that excuse as a reason not to support reform?  If Single Payer needs 4 more votes and a dozen Representatives have no opinion because the votes are not there, what does that mean, exactly?!?! 

    It sounds like someone in high school not giving an opinion because they don't want to be unpopular.  This position lacks any principles.  The issue is whether we can improve the health care delivery system, and by that I mean delivering healthcare.  I am not concerned with delivering profits to shareholders.  The system would be better if the patients were the shareholders and no one BUT shareholders benefitted when income exceeded expenses.  The present system is about providing profits with providing healthcare as a necessary evil.  The dream of the shareholder is maximized profits.  Who cares if anyone feels better.  Give the shareholders a bunch of money and they feel better.  See!  The system works!

    "I can't vote for this because the votes are not there" should be translated into "I am not voting for that."  It is really all that needs to be said.

    Climate Change: This is the Week, Let's Make it Ours




    First posted at RACblog.

    Have you ever thought about taking action on climate change and wondered, "Does my voice really matter?" If so, then today is your day!

    Read more »

    Does Minnesota Have Two Senators Yet?


    When is there supposed to be resolution on the Franken/Coleman race?

    (Don't) Legalize It! Decriminalize it.


    Without a doubt marijuana isn't nearly as a bad as cigarettes or alcohol.  But with the question of legalization, I think we should ask 'what would be the sum of the benefits and harms that would accompany legalization?'  I believe in a paternalistic state, if the state is reducing human suffering by being paternalistic.  So I wouldn't just accept it as an inviolable principle that the state should 'treat us like adults' and value choice over overall happiness.  There has to be a measurable net positive effect from legalizing marijuana.

    I think if marijuana were legalized, sold everywhere, and advertised, then we would end up with millions and millions more problem pot smokers.  I'm no stranger to pot, and I know it isn't physically addicting, but it can make you forget that life can be enjoyable without it.  It's not just a stereotype that pot can make you dreary and unmotivated.  People can get hooked on it, and while its effects are not nearly as bad as alcoholism, the effects are serious nonetheless. 

    So I think if it were legalized we would have millions of people who would experience less overall achievement and personal fulfillment.  Heck, if I could buy it at the 7-11 I'd probably be on the couch watching Seinfeld while eating everything in sight.  So in my mind, legalization is a bad idea.

    But criminalization is an even worse idea.  Despite all I said in the above paragraph, pot is relatively harmless, especially for occasional users.  The process of arresting and slapping a criminal record on a pot user is just cruel.  At least legalization has the huge tax revenue in its favor.

    So, I think decriminalization is the way to go.  Make sure pot stays somewhat below the surface, but keep the punishment to a slap on the wrist.

      

    Neda: Hot Slut of the Week


    All hail the heroines of Tehran!

    Across this great nation, the media rejoice at the stunning bravery of Iranian women who have taken to the streets to protest their faulty election.  In a country where women's rights are viciously curtailed and their voices silenced, these progressive ladies have taken a stand for women everywhere-- challenging a repressive regime that treats them like second-class citizens.

    Sure.  But the most excited congratulations these women have received has been from conservative commentators.

    Why are pro-Democracy, pro-freedom conservatives so eager to support women's rights in the Middle East while they voice their discomfort with abortion and equal pay laws over here?

    It's because the Iranian women aren't slutty enough.

    Notice the breathless descriptions of the valiant Tehranian females-- they are the ones with the "loose" head scarves, the ones who dare to reveal more of their bodies.  Surely, such actions can be seen as protest, and daring in a country where girls aren't even allowed to hang out with boys on their own.  But the patriarchy-- ours, not theirs-- only want Iranian women's lib to go so far.  The problem with the burqa and the veil aren't that they relegate women to near-inanimate object status-- it's that they prevent the further objectification of women.

    How can you keep a woman safely in the realm of a conquerable sexual item when her whole body is covered?

    That's the dilemma for conservatives.  Part of the reason women choose to cover themselves in the Middle East is to protect themselves from men.  Segregated subway cars are seen as a way to shield women from the rapey eyes and hands of men, who can't be trusted.  Part of that is self-fulfilling prophecy:  treating women like delicate flowers whose purity requires safeguarding while treating men like lecherous hounds means that everybody may just play their prescribed roles.

    Women shouldn't be discriminated against for not choosing to wrap their bodies in garb many Westerners find excessively modest.  But for conservatives, the women's movement is not about choice.

    They feel more comfortable with women who overtly seek acceptance from a man's world by making themselves as sexually appealing to straight men as possible.

    And so Neda, the martyr who has inspired the Twitter revolution and tugged on Obama's heartstrings, becomes the symbol for American men everywhere who want Iranian women to have the same opportunities to be hypersexualized (and demonized for it) that Western women do.  The conservatives cloak their distate for the veil in feminism-- but their true motivations lie in an opposing orthodoxy.

    Off with the burqa!  Now hike that skirt up.  Loosen your bra straps.  Don't worry if your heels are too high.  We'll call you a whore later.

    An Open Response to Halliburton


      BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

    An Open Response to Halliburton

     

    Ms. Gabriel,

    I'm writing in response to your June 23rd request for an immediate correction to a statement made regarding the Halliburton Corp. in my June 20th article, Healthcare: Why Can't We Get the Congressional Option? Your communication reads as follows:

    FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION

    The article, "Healthcare: Why Can't We Get the Congressional Option?" posted Saturday, June 20, on The Wattree Chronicle contains information about Halliburton that is completely misleading and incorrect.

    Halliburton is not a military contractor. Halliburton is one of the world's largest providers of products and services to the energy industry, and serves the upstream oil and gas industry throughout the lifecycle of the reservoir - from locating hydrocarbons and managing geological data, to drilling and formation evaluation, well construction and completion, and optimizing production through the life of the field.

    You will note that all of the government services and engineering and construction businesses have been and remain with KBR. To confirm, KBR and Halliburton are completely separate and independent of each other. Halliburton separated KBR from the company in April 2007 (http://www.halliburton.com/public/news/pubsdata/press_release/2007/corpnws_040507a.html.

    We respectfully request you make this correction immediately.
    Kind regards,

    Diana Gabriel
    Senior Manager, Public Relations
    Halliburton
    diana.gabriel@halliburton.com
    Office: 713.759.2608
    Cell: [Redacted]
    Fax: 281.575.5790

    While I am always careful to obtain multiple sources for any assertions that I make in my articles, nevertheless, I went back to objectively revisit the facts just in case it was necessary to accommodate your request. Halliburton is only mentioned one time in the entire article, and the paragraph reads as follows:

    "And there's a very logical reason for that. Business, by it's very nature, is designed to generate profit, not to provide services - there was ample evidence of that during the Bush administration. Prior to the military turning over many of its support services to Halliburton, for example, we never heard about our troops being given contaminated water or being electrocuted in the shower. The reason for that is our military's top priority was maintaining the troops, while Halliburton's top priority is maximizing its profits. The very same dynamic is at work when it comes to insuring our citizens - and the politicians know it, but they don't care, because again, for them, it's about me first, and only then, the public good. I mean, am I the only one sick of these people dictating what is on and off the table? I don't think so."

    Try as I might, Ms. Gabriel, I can't find anything inaccurate about that statement. While you pointed out that "Halliburton separated KBR from the company in April
    2007," testimony before the Senate Democratic Policy Committee indicates that KBR was providing our military with substandard services long before then - and then, being rewarded for it.

    On May 20, 2009 Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), chairman of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, opened the hearings on "Rewarding Failure: Contractor Bonuses for Faulty Work in Iraq," with the following statement, which reads in part:

    "Today's hearing is a result of this Committee's continuing investigation into the deaths of over a dozen U.S. soldiers by electrocution in Iraq. That investigation has led us to internal Pentagon documents showing that in 2007 and 2008, contractor KBR received bonuses of $83.4 million for work that, according to the Pentagon's own investigation, led to the electrocution
    deaths of U.S. troops."

    That doesn't mean that the work was performed in 2007 and 2008 - that's when they received the bonuses.

    The committee's third witness was Mr. Charles Smith. Mr Smith was the former Chief of HQ, Army Field Support Command Field Support Contracting Division. According to Sen. Dorgan's opening statement, "In that capacity, he [Mr. Smith] managed the massive LOGCAP contract that the Pentagon awarded to KBR, until he was forced out of his job in 2004 when he refused to approve paying KBR more than $1billion in questionable charges . . . I should note that Mr. Smith was removed from his job despite the fact that in November 2004; Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld awarded himthe Department of Defense's Medal for Distinguished Civilian Service."

    Mr. Smith's testimony includes the following:

    "In August 2004, the Army's approach to KBR underwent a complete change. The goal of award fee boards became one of making KBR financially sound, even if it was not performing in accordance with the contract. This was consistent with actions to rescind the 15% withhold, definitize contract cost estimates well above the DCAA recommended amounts, and remove me from my position. The Army's stated reason is that it was afraid KBR would cease performance or allow their subcontractors to cease performance. I did not think this was a credible threat, as KBR would have lost its military business entirely by this action. I do not believe the Army has
    stated the real reason for its change in approach to KBR."

    So frankly, Ms. Gabriel, I don't see where I was inaccurate at all. In fact, Halliburton's position seems to be completely analogous to a man who gets his hand shot off while committing a robbery, then pleads not guilty on the grounds that he's no longer associated with the hand that held the gun.

    Thus, with all due respect, I think I'll let the article stand as is. I don't see where it is the least bit misleading. In fact, upon review, I don't think I went far enough - but I fully intend to remedy that situation in the very near future.



    Eric L. Wattree
    wattree.blogspot.com

    Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everybody who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

    Beliefnet on PBS Board Enforcement of Bylaws: Should Religious Content Be Allowed?


    The Rev. Barry Lynn wrote an interesting post about PBS's Board voting to enforce a ban on sectarian programming for its local stations this month, but exempting certain stations that air specifically sectarian religious programs. What Lynn does not address is advocacy for preferred religious teachings on shows that are otherwise secular. This is one of the loudest left-partisan hypocrisies where left-leaning executives wink at establishment clause violations so long as it suits their ideology or the religious perspectives of fellow partisans.
    For example, on today's Sesame Street program rerun on my local PBS station, a muppet read a story as part of skit, concluding that "Cinderella joined a Yoga class and lived healthily ever after." Yoga is to Hinduism what the stations of the Cross are to Catholicism: a physical practice of the faith. Each practice is part of its respective religion's teachings, principles and belief system. While I saw Sesame Street depict a farm family's routine as including a dinner time prayer which was not clearly affiliated other than being monotheistic, this was incidental, whereas in its direct messaging to children, it advocates some religions as healthy and omits or revises others. That is an establishment clause issue where public funds go to support these programs and stations.

    It is a problem with children's shows because those who are propagandists (not all of course) among PBS decision makers reason that adults who watch specific religious programming on some local stations have already made up their mind and the religious programming makes no difference to others. However, in the case of children's shows, PBS allows programming content which purports to know better than parents what religions are "healthy" and which are not. If the segment dialogue I related above said, "Cinderella was then baptized into Christ and lived healthily forever after," there would be an outrage about the establishment clause violation unless of course the programmers turned it into a parody or satire using other elements. Where is the liberal value of equality and fairness in honoring the law where PBS is concerned?
    For those who are not Hindu or pagan, the Hindu and pagan insertions within Sesame Street are sad; Sesame Street otherwise has a great learning program, although some of it could be a bit less manic in pace.

    The Yoga religious practices make their way into Sesame Street often. If the purpose was to encourage children to be physically fit, then why not advocate a form of physical fitness that doesn't also double as a religion? Baseball, gymnastics or tennis for example? These are fit sports and also teach focus. Otherwise, to be equal, fair and accommodating, shouldn't Sesame Street also air advocacy of each and every religious practice its viewers might hold sacred? Surely such a burdensome requirement illustrates why sneaking favored religious content into children's shows shouldn't be allowed in the first place.
    If the Yoga advocated is merely for fitness, then I expect many will soon demand that the physically beneficial aspects of their respective faiths be equally represented on Sesame Street. Politicizing religion is bad enough. Doing it to kids using tax payer dollars is especially invasive.

    Will We Stand Up For The Right Neda?


    Posted by Ron Powell

    w/permission; Kathy Riordan,Open Salon

    When the graphic video of a young girl dying on the streets of Tehran was first uploaded to the Internet last Saturday, there was no name attached to it. All we knew was the face of a young girl struggling for her last breaths after a sniper's bullet exploded in her heart, as others
    attempted to save her.

    Later we learned her name was 'Neda.'

    Hamed R., the Iranian expatriate living in The Netherlands who was first to put the video online and bring it to the attention of the media, told those inquiring he thought her name was possibly 'Neda Soltani.' Not long after that people posted the name online; it was only a few steps from there before someone discovered a photo attached to the name 'Neda Soltani' and started using it in tribute to the young woman who'd died.

    The photo erroneously attributed to the young Neda who died in the video. This photo belongs instead to a living woman with the same name.


    It was a photo of a young woman in a brightly colored headscarf, said to be a passport photo, and the resemblance was close enough people believed it was the Neda who'd met an untimely death on the streets of Tehran. It was put on posters, used at memorials, and incorporated into online tributes.

    Problem is, it wasn't the same Neda.

    Dr. Amy Bean, one of the first to see the disturbing images in the video last weekend, was so intrigued to learn the identity of the young girl that she decided to do her own sleuthing. Finding a 'Neda Soltani' online, she sent a message. That Neda responded to Amy, telling her she was not the woman in the video, but when she did, her photo appeared on Amy's Facebook page. Others saw it attached to the name, and without realizing it was the wrong photo, started using it all over the Internet.

    The living Neda Soltani was disturbed to suddenly see her image being used everywhere, online, on television and in the press, and solicited Amy's help in alerting the media to get it removed, no easy task. Some people have taken the photo and started using it as their own avatar online, and for many, it has become inseparable with the martyrdom of a young girl.

    Because of the confusion, the 'real' Neda Soltani in the photo can no longer use her Facebook page or display her photo, and has fought an uphill battle trying to get individuals and the media to stop using it.

    In recent days we've heard from family and friends of the young woman who died in the video, whom we've come to know was Neda Agha-Soltan, and they've supplied several photos for use in the press. Unfortunately, however, many people in both social and mainstream media are continuing to use the photo of another Neda, a living Neda, and making it into an icon of a movement.

    Family supplied photo of Neda Agha-Soltan, the young woman who died in the video on the streets of Tehran.

    I smell a new idiom in this Sanford affair


    The confluence of the Sanford affair and  my current infatuation with all things idiomatic & aphoristic has got me giddy at the possibilities in this current event.  While some idioms are born of peasant knowledge(make hay while the sun shines, you can lead a horse to water...) others are born of actual current events that get inserted into the vernacular with a clever phrasing that gets repeated until its meaning is clear but the original inspiration is not.  The "whole nine yards" is a good example.  Most people consider that one a football expression but it really makes no sense in that context (a first down requires 10 yards).  It is purportedly based on the length of the machine gun magazine belt from world war II(9yards).  It  could also be based on the fact most concrete trucks hold nine yards.  Whatever the source of this common idiom the meaning is clear: Give me all you got.

    Now the Sanford affair is pregnant with possibility.  Lets start with "Are you going to hike the Appalachian trail?'  or "I am going to take a hike on the AT this weekend." No longer is this simply a conversation between dedicated Sierra Club members with a long weekend on their hands.   As you are getting ready to leave the office and hear those quips you may begin to wonder just who is doing what(or who is doing who as the case may be.)  Perhaps the phrase "I gave my security team the night off." or "Buenos Aires is a beautiful city" will gain a foothold in the dalliance department.  I am sure there are many more idioms waiting in the wings to make their appearance before this whole episode plays out but the Appalachian Trail reference will never be the same for me.

    A Tale of Three Fathers and Seven Sons


    This entry is provoked (that's a good word) by two of the most disturbing Father's Day news stories I heard this week.  Marshall, Landon, Bolton, and Blake were left by their father in the care of their mother over Father's Day.  He was off to Argentina on business of his own.  Nathaniel was beaten by his father on Father's Day-beaten so badly that the decision whether to take him off life support rests in a Judge's hands today.  A court gave his father custody of Nathaniel for the summer.  He was repeatedly abused and beaten the four weeks before the ultimate injury which left him brain dead.  Mike (me) and Steve (my little brother) are doing just fine at 68 and 64 respectively, though their father passed away ten days after his sixty-fifth birthday, more than 30 years ago.

    How lucky we were, the two of us.   How different Richard was from Mark or Leslie.  Richard was not powerful and didn't seek power.  He had a high school diploma and learned a bit about repairing radios by taking a correspondence course.  He wasn't one who needed a fuss made over him.  I suppose he got his share of pretty awful ties on Father's Day, though that was not as big a deal in the forties and fifties as it is now.  I'm sure there were times the whole family simply overlooked it.  There was no recognition in Church similar to Mother's Day, when Mothers stood up embarrassedly while the Preacher gushed over their virtues, and no one got a boutonniere for Father's Day (living dad, red, dead dad, white) as they did on Mother's Day.

    My dad never "governed" anything.  He wasn't on the church board.  He was an usher-passing out bulletins and greeting people.  At other times, he sang in the choir.  All of us were singers.  I suspect he could have become church chairman if he wanted to...everyone liked him.  But perhaps one of the reasons everyone liked him was that he could care less about the chairmanship.

    My dad was a placid man, at peace with himself-or so he seemed on the outside.  Mom was not the easiest person in the world to live with.  He loved her, and us, and cared for us, and sheltered us, and lived to sixty-five.  She passed 6 days before her 100th birthday.  No doubt there were times when I deserved a bit of correction.  I got one spanking-just one.  I stole a package of Blackjack Gum from the corner grocery store one block from our house.  Do they even make Blackjack Gum any more.  Mr. C.B. Johnson-everyone called him CeeBee, was a member of the family Church.  He had eyes in the back of his head, and walked the short block to my home to inform the father of his son's malefactions.  Mom it was who insisted on the spanking-she was terribly embarrassed.  So I was marched down to the basement, laid over my father's knee, and given three swats-pants down, underpants up.  I remember my dad saying that the spanking hurt him more than it hurt me.  In this case, I believe that was true. 

    Dad was the most ordinary of men, which makes him a superman, of course.  He dressed up in a bathrobe and put a lampshade on his head to tell us bedtime stories as King Hezekiah.  The stories were his own-about two goldfish, Sammy and Susie.  Later, he embarrassed me yearly at the annual basketball game and the high school faculty.  Fifteen year olds are really good at blushing, and when dad's uniform shorts fell down revealing a pair of boxers with huge red hearts on them, the people in the bleachers howled with laughter.  I just howled.  But if he had refused to play the fool one year, I would have been as disappointed as everyone else would have been

    Dad taught my brother how to be a super dad himself, and he taught me how to be a pretty darn good uncle.  Gay males of my generation weren't in a position to adopt-but I've had about 6,000 "children" in my university teaching career...and I see a lot of my father in the way I've treated them.  (I've yet to spank any, but then I don't have any who have stolen Blackjack Gum from C. B. Johnson).

    So while we rail or gloat at Mr. Family Values of South Carolina, depending on our temperaments, and while we stand aghast at what Nathaniel's father did, and how an agency charged with protecting children from domestic violence failed him utterly, maybe we can count our blessings for our absolutely ordinary absolutely wonderful fathers-the majority of us who were so blessed.  Belated Happy Father's Day.

    Regarding Heraldress Bachmann's missive from Moonbase Zebra


    In a dispatch from Moonbase Zebra, Heraldress Bachmann whips out the Alarum Way Back Tesseract Generating Time Morpher to spam the ether with:

    "Take this into consideration. If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the Census Bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations at the request of President Roosevelt, and that's how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps," said Bachmann. "I'm not saying that that's what the Administration is planning to do, but I am saying that private personal information that was given to the Census Bureau in the 1940s was used against Americans to round them up, in a violation of their constitutional rights, and put the Japanese in internment camps."

    and previously from Moonbase Zebra:

    " I believe that there's a very strong chance that we will see that young people will be put into mandatory service. And the real concern is that there are provisions for what I would call re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward and then they have to go and work in some of these politically correct forums. It's very concerning. It appears that there's a philosophical agenda behind all of this, and especially if young people are mandated to go into this. As a parent, I would have a very, very difficult time seeing my children do this.

    I know it's a stretch, but IMO it's not beyond reasonable, to inquire if the use of the word camps and the concept of mandatory group education (never mind census data being used during wartime) would be used by her in regard to, for instance, a draft?

    Not that she'd oppose that. Blood, guts, and patriotism centered around the martial? Good. What febrile imaginings she's attempting to elaborate? Bad. Probably because they are just that: vague phantoms that don't exist.

    Sort of like whatever is lurking under her bed. Dust bunnies, most likely; really vicious dust bunnies.

    Weekly Immigration Wire: Reform Stagnates, Polarization Grows Immigration NewsLadder


    by Nezua, TMC Mediawire Blogger

    President Obama has often stated that immigration reform cannot be approached in a piecemeal fashion, and that his administration would tackle the issue in 2009. This week, Obama will be meeting with members of Congress to kick off a bi-partisan approach to reform. These meetings don't guarantee any legislative action will take place this year, but are at least an encouraging sign. In the meantime, the deportation industry shows no sign of slowing, hate crimes are rising and hate groups are being main streamed. As a result, the polarization between reform advocates and foes is getting worse.

    New America Media's Jun Wang writes about the disapointing consensus reached by a panel of immigration activists last Thursday at California State University in Los Angeles. A lack of movement around immigration reform won't help curb rising rates of hate crimes against Latino/as, and compounds other instances of "othering" and racism. According to one panelist: "Employers in conservative cities" are learning that "they are better off not hiring people who are 'foreign looking or having foreign sound names.'"

    Not content with simply raiding homes, workplaces, or storming the local 7-11, Immigrations Customs and Enforcement (ICE) is escalating its enforcement tactics. Also in New America Media, Hiram Soto reports on the joint operation between the Border Patrol and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in deporting three high-school age girls, one as young as 16, who were stopped by ICE on their way to school. Immigration attorney Lilia Velasquez, who is representing the minors, said she "hasn't seen anything like this in her 25-year career," because the children are being let back into the U.S. to fight their deportation.

    The plight of these girls is proof that the destructive deportation fetish sweeping the Department of Homeland Security is producing increasingly ridiculous results.

    Pundits like Michael Savage are also feeding the violent and anti-immigrant, anti-Latino/a energy in the U.S. Samhita Mukhopadhyay at Feministing writes that these broadcasts are are created "for the purpose of inciting violence against immigrants and to fuel racial tension." Exposing Savage's "paranoid" and fearful obfuscation of reality, Mukhopadhyay clears up the anti-immigrant propaganda by pointing out that despite Savage's tortured logic, the truth is that Immigrants are the "working base" of California, and not the ones creating a drain upon it. California's immigrants pay roughly $40 billion in taxes every year.

    One of the loudest politicians feeding anti-immigrant hostility is Tom Tancredo, a former Republican congressman from Colorado. The Colorado Independent has linked Tancredo to the Minuteman American Defense (MAD) and its former Executive Director Shawna Forde, accused of murdering Raul and Brisenia Flores, via a letter expressing the politician's solidarity and gratitude to the organization for organizing a rally. It turns out that not only was this beaming "boilerplate rejection letter" (as campaign chair Bay Buchanan hopes to position it) sent to Forde, but a story published by the Everett Herald in 2007 places official Tancredo campaign staff at the event. The connections don't end there and only grow more unsettling.

    Those fighting for justice and on the side of human rights are hardly laying low in this time of legislative uncertainty. In a guest column for RaceWire, undocumented immigrant Sonia Guinansaca writes about how over 500 students from all over the U.S. attended a "Mock Graduation ceremony" on Capitol Hill last Tuesday. The ceremony was intended to both draw attention and show support for the DREAM Act. Guinansaca reminds us of our country's most inspiring ideals: To be a nation where "nothin' is impossible."

    RaceWire also brings us more news of youth behind change in Immigrants' Kids File Lawsuit Against US, and Other News. In this political lull, "the kids of hundreds of deported parents are filing a lawsuit against the government claiming their constitutional right to stay in the U.S. is violated by the deportation of their parents."

    *Editor's note: The original version of this post implied that all movement towards immigration reform had halted. We've updated this blog to reflect recent developments. Stay tuned to next week's Wire for in-depth analysis of the push for effective immigration reform.

    This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about immigration.

    Visit Immigration.NewsLadder.net for a complete list of articles on immigration, or follow us on Twitter.

    And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy and health issues, check out Economy.NewsLadder.net and Healthcare.NewsLadder.net.

    This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of 50 leading independent media outlets, and was created by NewsLadder.

    What Would Sarah or Hillary Do? Why Women Pols Dodge Sex Scandals


    In her surprisingly beautiful memoir, Resilience, Elizabeth Edwards puzzles that the man she built a life with, including a 30,000-plus square-foot homestead, could fall like Dominoes for such a tacky pick-up line ("You are so hot!") and, by implication, for such a tacky broad (a woman whose very name, Rielle Hunter, seems to say, "Bad blonde highlights, courtesy tin foil scraps.")

     

    In the hilarious romp of political man-boys behaving badly - cue Clinton and Livingston and McGreevey and Gingrich and Craig and Vitter and Spitzer and Ensign and now Sanford - I can only wonder, What if the gender table were turned? 

     

    Imagine a high-profiled female politician standing at the press conference lectern, muttering the inane mea culpas of the philandering men:

     

    Kathleen Sebelius: "It depends what the definition of sex is is."

     

    Sarah Palin: "My truth is that I am a gay American."

     

    Hillary Clinton: "And so oddly enough, I spent the last five days of my life crying in Argentina."

     

    Jennifer Granholm: "I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport elaborately tapping my foot in a bathroom stall."

     

    Better yet, just imagine these women's husband's sticking around by the press-conference lectern to hear such gibberish.

     

    Or just think of the hypocrisy. Republican Senator David Vitter, of Louisiana, frequented the DC Madam and the Canal Street Madam, yet fiercely advocated abstinence-only sex education and amending the Constitution to ban gay marriage!  Or better yet, could you imagine a Congresswoman sponsoring the Child Modeling Exploitation Prevention Act of 2002 to outlaw web sites featuring sexually lewd images of minors  and then trading sexually lewd  instant messages with, well, minors?  ("Don't Ask, Don't Email!")

     

    Why don't women leaders get snared in such scandals? Do women lack the hypocrisy gene?  (Apparently not: Sarah Palin supports abstinence only education for all youth!)  A golddigger is a hooker - only smarter.  Perhaps less male golddiggers prowl Capitol Hill for prize prey.

     

    Or perhaps women leaders just have more common sense.

    Health industry bilking the country.


    Yes...not just the insurers. I know for a fact the there are labs and
    hospitals that double-dip if you don't pay attention. One lab that I
    have to use will bill you for the full amount before they get anything
    from the insurance company and if you are gullible enough or  intimidated
    and pay, they will also take from the insurance company not refund
    your over payment. I also know of at least on local hospital that uses
    the same tactics.

    The whole system is one big rip off.

    C

    A bit of perspective on Iran --



    Today's post is a compilation of news items from mostly foreign sources covering the Iranian government's presidential election crisis. It begins with how things were before Iran's world turned upside down. I conclude with a bit of perspective on U.S. national security, that reminds us of how lucky we are to have our solid new president around, when the Middle East's beset by chaos.

    How fast things changed after the election -- On June 15th, Russia's Ria Novosti reported that "the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Monday he welcomed the U.S. initiative to begin direct talks with Iran without any preconditions and on the basis of mutual respect."

    Violence escalates -- This rare information is from The Washington Note, "Guest Blog: Dispatches from Tehran," (6/22/09). Steve Clemons introduces the blogger: "An anonymous student in Tehran who has been writing and speaking in the media under the name, "Shane M." has just sent in some more dispatches." The BBC News of 6/22/09 says that details are emerging about how "hi-tech helped Iranian monitoring" of its citizens during the protests, with the help of Nokia Siemens. The world was galvanized on 6/23/09: Memeorandum headlined, "Family, friends mourn Iranian woman whose death was caught on video," taken from Borzou Daragahi of the LA Times In summary: "Neda Agha-Soltan, 26, 'was a beam of light' and not an activist, friends say. The video footage of her bleeding to death on the street has turned her into an international symbol of the protest movement." Next "Fresh street clashes in Tehran" outside of parliament were examined by the Financial Times on 6/24/09.

    World leaders responded -- The 6/23/09 BBC News reports that the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was "urging Iran to end the violence." Summarizing: "United Nations chief Ban Ki-moon expressed his "dismay" at the use of force against civilians in the wake of Iran's disputed election." The Financial Times of London is of the opinion that President Obama "toughened his stance on Iran" after Monday, June 22. The BBC News (6/23/09) says that President Obama strongly condemned "unjust" violence of Iran clamping down on election protests, saying he respects Iran's sovereignty and that it was "patently false" of Iran to say the West was fomenting the unrest.

    Calming worries -- President Obama's handling of the Iranian crisis has been right on point, in my opinion. His "heart broke" along with ours as young women, students and others who want freedom were murdered, beaten and imprisoned. But the deep unrest that might indicate a growing instability in the country is just that. It does not mean we confront a nuclear cloud as might have been the case in a Bush administration. David Morrison, who writes CQ Behind the Lines (6/25/09) said, to quote:
    In pondering a nuclear-armed Iran, "no plausible scenarios come to mind where terrorism comes into play, or where Tehran ever would have any reason to share nuclear capability with a terrorist client," an ex-CIA analyst writes in National Journal.

    References -- from Tom Head who writes the About.com Civil Liberties Guide:


    My all-in-one Home Page of websites where I post regularly: Carol Gee - Online Universe

    Technorati tags: news news and politics Iran foreign policy war and conflict Obama

    His First Opinion


    To my knowledge this is Clarence Thomas' first written opinion on any decision handed down by the Supreme Court. Doesn't he usually go along with whatever the Scalia side says?

    From the Washington Post:

    In a dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas found the search legal and said the court previously had given school officials "considerable leeway" under the Fourth Amendment in school settings.

    Officials had searched the girl's backpack and found nothing, Thomas said. "It was eminently reasonable to conclude the backpack was empty because Redding was secreting the pills in a place should thought no one would look," Thomas said.

    Thomas warned that the majority's decision could backfire. "Redding would not have been the first person to conceal pills in her undergarments," he said. "Nor will she be the last after today's decision, which announces the safest place to secrete contraband in school."

     

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062501690.html

     

    U.N. DRUG REPORT


    No morally responsible adult should advocate drug legalization. 

    A newly released U.N. drug report with scientific research findings concluded that marijuana use causes brain damage. 

    Marijuana is generally the "drug of entry" for teen agers and young people who succomb to abusing "hard drugs" like cocaine and heroine.  The movement for so-called "medicinal marijuana" is an addict's excuse for legalizing a dangerous illicit drug that damages the human brain, destroys families, engenders mental illness, sabotages individual potentialities, creates personal endangerment and incinerates hope for the future. 

    Liberty is not anarchy, but the enjoyment of secured constitutional freedoms within the boundaries of the rule of law based upon given consent.

    There are legally manufactured drugs on the market for pain management which have been tested for human consumption while providing contra-indications and warnings against overdose and misuse.

    In short, drug use, abuse or addiction is the most horrendous "brain drain" in a nation.  This destructive temptation ought to be removed from young people's environment before irreversible damage is caused.  For, this type of self-destruction is preventable and optimally desirable for all parents who envision providing for their families without this impending disaster factoring into their daily lives.

    Accountable adults who do lawfully "know better," should lead the way in being morally responsible for building a society in which security for children and young people represents a paramount cause and most supreme interest in preserving the next generation of leaders, professionals and workers for constructive living, healthy growth, moral maturity, and continuum prosperity. 

     

     

     

    Letter to Barack and Senators and Congressman


    This is a letter I just mailed this morning to Barack my senators and congressman.

     

    Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Saving consumers and taxpayers billions or trillions of dollars isn't in the interest of corporate America or of congress. Both have an opposing interest. That is, their interests are in opposition to the interests of the general population.

     

    It could not be more evident that what is going on is criminal. However, congress and government in general have chosen to express this differently. Congress has expressed this pseudo-intent in order to obfuscate what is apparent criminal intent. And the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of this pseudo-intent and thus is party to the criminality. The proof of this criminally culpable pseudo-intent is in the result. Always examine the stated goal and then measure the one obtained. The differential is an expression of the effectiveness of the ruling body to deliver a workable solution. The measurement also specifies that where the obtained result is consistently undesirable, there exists a clear probability of a conflict of interest and a likely obfuscation of true intent. When this apparent obfuscation of intent ends in serious harm to the general state of the nation, extending to the broader population, it becomes rather obvious that the threshold of criminality has been met or exceeded.

     

    It is thoroughly impossible to examine how our federal government has transformed its viewpoint and obligation to citizens over the years and not see the demonstrable shift of allegiance. The harmful outcomes produced reflect this shift of representation and make an unambiguous statement of inequality and corruption. An objective examination reveals an ethical collapse of epic proportion. This assertion is most evident and fully supported by the frequency with which our elected officials stand before this country and misrepresent or lie about the facts of a situation. This is the norm. Not the exception. Throughout my lifetime my government has repeatedly, inexcusably and increasingly produced results which have brought great harm to this country.

     

    In the final measure, congress and our government are either grossly inept or thoroughly corrupt. There is little question that the evidence points to the latter. The only hope of reversing this is by renouncing the falsehood where it has been specified that the attributes of citizens are in equal measure those of corporations. Corporations are not citizens in any way shape or form. The contentious relationship between citizens and corporations clearly establishes this most evident of facts. Please bear in mind that this contention has changed completely over the last sixty years. It was one a hallmark of the relationship between government and business. This lie, without a doubt, translates to criminal intent. Only through the intentional distortion of simple logic and common sense is it possible to arrive at this undeniably false conclusion. That this is intentional and false renders all your actions derived of it as criminal in nature. No matter if a court rules this so or not does not alter the reality of the outcome.

     

    I condemn, without reservation, everything you do that preserves and promotes the immensity of this fraud that you have visited upon my country.

     

     

    Speculative Threat of Terrorism Tilts to Enforcing, Not Ignoring Geneva


    CIA Abuses, and DOJ OLC Legal Counsel Liability

    An article in the New Yorker seemed to indirectly highlight well the problem the US government has: Of not paying attention to Geneva, discussed here and here.

    Combined with some previous comments about lawyer liability to non-clients, it looks as though Cheney has some more to worry about.

    Read more »

    CREDIT CARD INDUSTRY + MEDICAL/ HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY = ?


    Morning TV with Morning Joe keeps getting weirder and weirder.

    Maybe this commercial has been running, but this morning was the first time I have seen it:

     

    An advertisement sponsored by a consortium of credit card companies (I noticed the Mastercard and Discover logos) featuring a woman who has a $17,000 medical bill at the hospital.  The ad encourages the viewer to use his/her credit cards to pay your medical bills, which amounts to the remaining hyper inflated charges that insurance won't cover. It used to be that the healthcare providers only inflated the charges to get more from the insurers without bothering the patient for the deductibles and other remaining amounts.

     

    Of course, if you don't have healthcare coverage you probably don't have credit cards.   For those of use that have healthcare coverage and no credit left, there is nothing like good old fashioned indentured servitude.   

     

    Lord knows we need stronger financial sector and health care/insurance sector regulation.  This crap is downright self destructive.      

     

     

    Still No Solid Connection Between Republicans and Corporations


    I really have grown dispirited over the lack of solid connection drawn by Media between Corporations and Republicans.

    Set aside for the moment all of the Democrats who cannot seem to operate in a fashion that puts people first....and let us just consider the different smokescreens thrown up by nearly ALL MEDIA as to who really pulls the strings of republicans. Contrary to popular memes, Repubs are not invigorated by their conservatism. Their social values. Their loyalty to a CAUSE. Their love of family. It isn't even a White Thing.

    Republicans cannot keep faith with their God. Cannot keep faith with their spouses. Cannot keep faith with their constituents. But they NEVER ONCE in recorded history have failed to keep faith with MONEY or their Corporate Masters. Perhaps that is because they truly ARE Corporate Beings....creatures designed and animated by Big Wealth.

    I would surely appreciate a News Source which properly labeled and tagged them as the servants of the Rich....the emissaries of Commerce....constantly and consistently.

    And of course we need to be weeding out the Dems who are Corporate Critters, or those who are being romanced by Corporations to betray their People.

    I sometimes understand how Naive commenters and young folks do not draw the fine distinction. But I cannot understand how reporters, journalists, and talking heads continue to bamboozle and obfuscate the one CORE, ROCK HARD principle of all Republicans and RightWing enterprise as CORPORATE CORPORATE CORPORATE.

    Corporations are effectively using the Philosopher's Stone....the old alchemist's holy grail....to turn Lead into Gold. They are turning the Natural World into pocket money. Everything on this planet is fair game for them to strip, chew, grind, smelt into wealth for themselves. Humans used to be, and many of us are still, part of whatever Natural World is left....and therefore we are also Grist for their Mill. Behold HealthCare....the ultimate CAPTURING of an entire people and the metering out of their years based on profit. Discard them when profit is less sure.

    We witnessed quite a backlash from the populace in 2006 and 2008....and quickly saw the clamps come down on that nonsense. Obama brougth quickly into line, reforms dashed, other initiatives squashed and ground into the mud. We are going nowhere the Corporations don't want us to go. At least it is time to stop calling their representatives Conservative, Family Values, Religious and other phoney names. Let us at least recognize WHO we are dealing with....InHuman Juggernauts with unlimited lifespan and powers - Corporations.

    My Letter of Complaint to the Management: it Worked!


    I just fired this off to TPM via the e-mail address at the top.

    Greetings, to whomever gets this: I wrote yesterday about two spam posts--advertisements in the form of advertisements.  They remained up all day.  Nothing was done.Today I sign on and There are Fourteen of them:  12 related to mortgages and one to refinancing automobiles and one to survey software.  This means fourteen reader posts have been scrolled off the front page.   If you want to kill reader blogging, all you need to do is do nothing.  I for one will not post again until these leeches are expunged.  Except, perhaps, to post my discontent at TPM inaction in this matter.


    I'm now off to post this to management blogs as a comment.  I don't often get my dander up...but it's up now.


    UPDATE:  They're GONE!  Yea!  Cheer!  Hat in the Air, and Thank you, kind TPM managers, editors, and the like.

     
    My dander is back down.  Now if I only had as much control over my dandruff  (sigh).

    Sanford Emails


    I know some people are going to have a problem with TPM and other outlets publishing Sanford's emails. In most cases, I would have been opposed to releasing these very personal commnications. They are excruciating to read for a number of reasons. But this piece of crap has invaded and politicized the private lives of women and gays over choice and marriage equality, and he has damaged the lives of thousands of South Carolinians through his hard-hearted refusal to take the stimulus money. So anything that destroys his own life, both personal and political, is ok with me. No mercy. Not this time.

    On Health Insurance WE ARE NOT THE LEFT


    As Paul Krugman points out, with the majority of Americans supporting a public option for health insurance, it's clear that those who support it are NOT THE LEFT BUT THE CENTER of public opinion.

    How can Obama cave in to pressure from the right wing of the party? We don't need any bipartisan result after an election that we won. We don't need any compromise or bipartisan plan when we have the support of the majority of Americans for what was promised.

    WE ARE NOT THE LEFT. Don't let any of these clowns portray us as such. 

    GOP 'Values' Record


    The below link leads to a post over at Democratic Underground which has the most complete list of actual (some, alledged) Republican malfeasance I've yet seen. Check it out.

    http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Political%20Tiger/72