« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Truth about Obama and Ayres
Obama claims he was not 'close' to terrorist Bill Ayres. He repeatedly
denied they ever had more than a passing association, living in the
same neighborhood and serving on the board of the Annenberg Challenge
together. The truth is a little different than what Obama would like
known. Bill Ayres pushed for and got Obama, then a relatively unknown
south side lawyer, selected to this board. From this position, Obama
had the authority to distribute $150 million, giving him instant
political influence and clout and making Obama an instant power player
in Chicago politics. From this position, Obama was able to build his
reputation and prepare for his political career. It was Bill Ayres that
held the first fund raiser for Obama, at his home, when Obama ran for
the State Senate. Ayres made Obama a force in Chicago politics, and the
two have been in contact as recently as 2007. They exchange phone calls
and emails. So Obama is lying when he claims he has no connection to
this terrorist. This man who tried to bomb a dance held for young
soldiers and their wives. This man who bombed the Capitol, bombed the
Pentagon, and orchestrated armed robberies (and was responsible for
several deaths). This man who in 2001 said he regretted only that he
didn't do more, and was photographed stomping an American flag. This is
the man who made Obama, despite what he claims.





Comments (69)
Thanks to your unsourced posting, all has now been revealed unto us. We are forever in your debt for this service you have bestowed upon us.
October 7, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's the matter? Can't use google yourself? Here's a CNN video on the connections:
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=190343
October 7, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your video doesn't support your charges.
October 7, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I second that. I took the time to watch the video, but I don't find any proof of your accusations there.
October 7, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
It does point out that it was Ayers that sought the Annenberg donation, it then states that Obama was recruited to be the Chairman, and that as such he oversaw the donation of hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Ayers's Peace School and other pet projects. A quid pro quo?
October 7, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You really should try to hire someone to make a fake website that you could try to offer as proof, so that your antics would not be quite so hilariously lame.
Just the fact that you think that Obama and this horrible nearly-satanic terrist being involved in charitable giving to improve education is somehow a winning issue is a source of boundless amusement to me.
Or that you think that it is strange that a former President of the Harvard Law Review, a law professor, known community worker and rising star in Chicago (40 under 40 in '93, for example) could be considered for such a position. Inconceivable!
Oh, and it turns out that it was Patricia Graham who tapped Obama after the two met. In case you were "troubled" about it.
October 7, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bulldog, I'll rec this because I want this discussion to get involved.
Now, for starters please give sources for the following statements (and include URLs)... thanks!
How many? Emails implies you would know the topics. What were they? When was the last one.
October 7, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Facts from fiction please.
“At the end of the dinner I said, ‘I really want you to be chairman.’ He said, ‘I’ll do it if you’ll be vice chairman,’ ” Ms. Graham recalled, and she agreed.
This is just patently false. Ayer gave a whopping $200 to the Obama Senate campaign. As to Ayers being behind Obama's political career get a grip.
Ayeres didn't even invite him Alice Palmer did.
Clever you really do need to do a bit more research. Not saying you need to vote Obama or all of a sudden get over Ayers, I know that will never happen. However a little intellectual honesty
instead of BS would be nice.
October 7, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Might try asking the sun to rise in the west tomorrow - your odds are better.
October 7, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Opps.
This is your statement that is patently false:
October 7, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your statement regarding Alice Palmer is not correct. I will try to find a link for you on that, she stated that it was Ayers that invited Obama and organized the event.
October 7, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a detailed report on Annenberg Challenge from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Annenberg_Challenge
It details that Bill Ayers was the founder of this project, that he was the one that organized it and pursued the grant. To assert he played no role in selecting board members is beyond credible. The fact that the board then approved large grants to Ayers projects shows the incestral nature of this group.
October 7, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know just because you think it's so doesn't make it so. And it seems everybody else involved with the Annenberg Challenge disagrees with you.
October 7, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bulldog, a number of people offered information on the grant recipients of the Annenberg money here.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/obama-and-ayers.php
No one actually drilled down to what each group did with the money, but, except for ACORN, nothing jumps off the page.
If you want to make something of the Ayers connection, you are going to have to talk about the groups that got funded and what they did with the money.
As for meeting with or knowing Ayers, don't forget that Ayers's reputation had been rehabilitated in Chicago by the time Obama met him. Why should a young politician be expected to be superior to the culture he's trying to be part of. Obama has since rejected and condemned everything Ayers did.
October 7, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
AS of when? They were still in contact with each other in 2005. When did Obama decide a terrorist murderer might not be good to hang with?
October 7, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not about hanging with. It's about condoning. Obama has never condoned what Ayers did. This is the same Wright to Farrakhan to Obama smear. Who cares who they knew or what they said? What did they do? Ayers blew things up. Obama knew someone who blew things up. Not the same thing.
October 7, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just click on the Bulldog's name to scan his posts. He seems to prefer the fact-free approach to his bluster.
October 7, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still think this debate is critical. It will keep people sharp when challenged by the vague charges of McCain/Palin/FNC.
October 7, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bulldog,
We are waiting here for your response. I welcome and open, intellectually honest discussion of the issues you brought up.
October 7, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, was having dinner. I will look for some links now since that's what everyone likes.
October 7, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fine. Do you not think that someone like Ayers is a scumbag? He admits he tried to kill soldiers and their wives, and is unrepentant.
October 7, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's a scumbag. He was a scumbag then and he's a scumbag now -- but a scumbag acceptable in liberal circles. Unless he and Obama did something that Obama is covering up, this dog won't hunt.
October 7, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
So come on, Bulldog. Exactly what did Obama and Ayers do together that was bad? Fund a project involving about 253 groups and schools that didn't accomplish much? If that's a crime, the entire Congress will have to go to jail. Tell me one bad thing the two of them did together.
October 7, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Scumbag only acceptable to liberals? I guess you didn't get the memo either. Don't be a dumb-ass who buys these lies. Educate yourself, man!
October 7, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to watch the debate, but one last thought before I go.
That's how we rehabilitate the reputation of our urban terrorists. We give them teaching gigs, help them write books. Take their money for political campaigns. Let them endow something if they're rich enough.
How do you guys rehabilitate the reputations of the people who bomb planned parenthood clinics and shoot doctors? How about the ones who bomb churches?
October 7, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
o o o deafening silence o o o
October 7, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yikes Bulldog, you didn't even spell Ayers correctly. Did you just hear it on talk radio?
October 7, 2008 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I guess I should have asked someone who knows him how to spell his name, but I don't have Obama's email or phone number!
October 7, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
You could ask anyone today. Wall Street is gasping for air and all the rightwing media can say is "Ayers."
October 7, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain's Deep Insidious Ties With The Kremlin, and how he helped them gain a strategic enclave in Western Europe.
McCain is a traitor.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081020/ames_berman/print
October 7, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about responding to the fact your post lacks anything resembling facts.
October 7, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain's long standing protection of Violent Domestic Terrorists.
McCain is Terrorists enabler.
http://www.jedreport.com/2008/04/john-mccains-do.html
Excerpt:
In both 1993 and 1994,
McCain voted against the anti-terrorism measure. On each occasion,
McCain was one of thirty radical anti-choice Senators to oppose the
bill Fortunately, despite McCain's opposition, it passed the Senate by
a 69-30 margin.
At the time, right-wing anti-choice extremists were terrorizing
women, doctors, and clinic staff across the United States with
thousands of acts of physical violence and threats of violence each
year. The new legislation was necessary because in early 1993, the
Supreme Court had ruled that even though the terrorism crossed state
lines, the federal government could not protect clinics without a
specific grant of statutory authority.
Meet The Real John McCain. Here is where he stands on the issues.
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/meet-the-real-mccain/mccain_on_the_issues.html
Excerpt:
Clinic Violence
* McCain voted against the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act
(FACE), which makes it a crime to forcibly interfere with women's
access to reproductive-health facilities. Learn more on NARAL Pro-Choice America's voting record.
* McCain voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment
at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed
against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.
October 7, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hehee. The pravda about Obama and Ayres [sic].
See, theCleverBulldog [sic], the problems are that:
1. All of your "troubling" accusations are contradicted by the NYT article, as well as the Chicago newspaper research done previously (yes, including the ones about Ayers' actions in the Weathermen.)
2. You provide not a single shred of a source that even tries to back these "troubling" accusations, let alone something that could show that the NYT and others were incorrect in their research.
October 7, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your NY Times article did point out that the 2 exchange emails and phone calls, while trying to downplay their connections.
October 7, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good job reading, champ.
October 7, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is what I said, how does it refute me? It documents the fact they exchanged email and phone calls. You are weird!
October 7, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
You said, three times, that they exchange calls and e-mails.
I trust even you know the difference between the past and present tenses.
October 7, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
How John McCain help Charles Keating defraud the Government, and ruin the Saving and Loans system, and how John McCain did not learn a lesson from it, and helped cause the current financial meltdown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDofbll86dY&feature=iv&annotation_id=event_922988
October 7, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
As usual you are totally clueless. McCain was absolved of any wrongdoing in the Keating scandal, and it was McCain who tried to regulate Fannie and Freddie despite democratic objections.
October 7, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although cleared of certain charges, he and Glenn were found to have "exercised poor judgment."
"The Senate Ethics Committee did not pursue, for lack of jurisdiction, any possible ethics breaches in McCain's delayed reimbursements to Keating for trips at the latter's expense, because they occurred while McCain was in the House. The House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct said that it too lacked jurisdiction, because McCain was no longer in the House." -wiki
October 7, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, for chrissakes. It was a Democratic ethics committee. That's like saying Clinton was guilty of something because the Republican House said so.
I'll tell you what's a shame. This Democratic Congress hasn't censured and expelled every Republican from the House and impeached Bush and Cheney.
October 7, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess that's why they did find against three of the five.
October 7, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the ethics committee ever would read their own rules and get active then we would see no end of ethics investigations of sitting members.
Some of our representatives in Washington are the grateful recipients of home loans and other loans extended at rates lower and terms more favorable than those available to the general public. The banks use their discretionary powers to grant such loans and the practice is of long standing.
However to accept such a loan IS an ethics violation and there has been a number of politicians with spotless reputations who have received them....
October 7, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain played stupid about Keating, while hiding behind the phony "reformer" mask. He hasn't "reformed" anything except -- constantly -- his views, from flip to flop.
He has made ONLY efforts to DEREGULATE -- MAKE LAWLESS -- which has been his constant boast until about one-and-one-half weeks ago.
Give it up, UncleverBullshitter: you OLNY fool illiterates who don't know the differnce between FACT, on one hand, and America-Hating RACIST SMEAR, on the other.
Buh-buy, LOSER.
October 7, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am going to ask on last time please offer up some facts that proves your post re: Ayers and Obama to anything close to accurate rather than stuff you heard on Rush and Fox.
October 7, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, what fact is in dispute? Ayers founded this group and got the grant. To claim the founder had no input to the selection of board members is not credible. Later this board donated hundreds of thousands to Ayers pet projects. And to claim that it is somehow an accident that the fund raiser for Obama was held at Ayers house? What? Ayres held the fund raiser at his home, and Obama attended. It is absurd to keep claiming that they have no connections.
October 7, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ayers founded the Annenberg Foundation?
Are you sure your name isn't the Unclever Whiner Dog?
October 7, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
He founded the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
October 7, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then why wasn't it called the Chicago Ayers Challenge?
October 7, 2008 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Refure this, dumbass:
"Walter Annenberg, a lifelong Republican and former ambassador who was appointed by Presidents Nixon and Reagan, funded an ambitious program to reform urban education in many cities in the mid 1990s. Ayers was an important member of the group that developed and wrote the grant proposal to the Annenberg Foundation."
October 7, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Refute this, dumb-ass:
"Walter Annenberg, a lifelong Republican and former ambassador who was appointed by Presidents Nixon and Reagan, funded an ambitious program to reform urban education in many cities in the mid 1990s. Ayers was an important member of the group that developed and wrote the grant proposal to the Annenberg Foundation."
October 7, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Refute this, dumb-ass:
"Walter Annenberg, a lifelong Republican and former ambassador who was appointed by Presidents Nixon and Reagan, funded an ambitious program to reform urban education in many cities in the mid 1990s. Ayers was an important member of the group that developed and wrote the grant proposal to the Annenberg Foundation."
October 7, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Times 3. Why would he refute it? It's exactly what he's saying Ayers did. To train a dog, first be smarter than the dog.
October 7, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aw Billy, not you too? There's abig difference between helping to write a grant, and being the "founder of a foundation." Why you defending this nutjob, anyway?
October 7, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yo, racist asshole: You are apparently too stupid to GET it:
It doesn't matter what Obama does or doesn't say on the matter. What matters are the OBJECTIVE FACTS, and those FACTS are WELL KNOWN.
And those FACTS point directly to YOU being a
LIAR.
And YOU KNOW you are a LIAR.
LYING is IMMORAL.
October 7, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain sat on the board of an Antisemitic Domestic Terrorist group.
John McCain has a long sordid history of being in bed with Domestic Terrorists.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/mccains_and_council_for_world_freedom.php
October 7, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out this Rolling Stone Mag. in depth Expose of John McCain; The Fake Maverick.
A very revealing article that exposes the real John McCain. He is worse than George W. Bush.
Click the link, and you can read it for yourselves.
Be sure to promulgate the link to all your contacts. Thanks.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/23316912/makebelieve_maverick/print
October 7, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain" Frank Rich.
A great column. Read it at this link. Thanks.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/pitbull-palin-mauls-mccain-ano.php
October 7, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin cheated, big time, on her tax filings.
The Wall Street Journal, a right wing paper, spells out how Sarah is a big tax cheater.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/10/06/with-palins-returns-tax-profs-move-back-to-the-spotlight/
Excerpt:
"The Palins did not report as income some $43,000 that the State of Alaska paid the Governor as an “allowance” for her husband and children’s travel. Can they do that? No, most likely not.
The Palins deducted $9,000 on their 2007 return, claiming it was a loss from Mr. Palin’s snow machine racing activity. Can they do that? Most likely not, but more info could make the deduction o.k. If any of the above issues goes against the Palins they then risk getting hit with the section 6662 penalty for “negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.”
October 7, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stick to the topic, liam.
You remind me of the blowhearts at FNC. All you are doing is spamming this thread with anti-McCain rhetoric and links.
All well and good.
But none have anything to do with the topic.
Your grade: enthusiasm - A
relevance - F
October 8, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Desperate liar lies desperately!
October 7, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Refure this as well, dumb-ass:
"It was never a concern by any of us in the Chicago school reform movement that he had led a fugitive life years earlier," said former Illinois state Republican Rep. Diana Nelson, who worked with both Obama and Ayers over the years. "It's ridiculous. There is no reason at all to smear Barack Obama with this association. It's nonsensical, and it just makes me crazy. It's so silly."
October 7, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
CB
Sorry if this is off point, but would like to know: Do you sincerely believe that the McCain/Palin ticket is the best for our country?
Before answering, this would mean you also consider Palin as the best Presidential candidate too. (Stuff happens! as history proves.)
No snark, just curious about your actual stance on this...
Thanks.
October 7, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Refute this one too, racist dumb-ass:
"Hallett calls this attack on Obama's association with Ayers and the Annenberg Challenge by further association, "a smear campaign. It's a political diatribe that has no basis in fact. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was an extremely positive initiative. It was well-vetted, thorough, and the fact that it is now is being used for political purposes is, in my opinion, outrageous."
October 7, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another piece of the puzzle for you to chew on WhinerDog:
"Ayers had been there for years, building a reputation that was so mainstream that a life long Republican, who was a former Ambassador appointed by Nixon and Regan, allowed the release of $50 Million to let him, prominent Republicans, corporate, civic leaders, and a Harvard trained community organizer form a board to oversee the disbursement of these funds related to school reform."
October 7, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Un-clever WhinerDog,
Or you could read the entire dismantling of your constant and pathetic attempt to promote your racist views here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/7/131120/885/357/622049
I dare ya'!
October 7, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Palins' Un-American Activities.
The Palins are traitors, and should be tried for sedition.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07/palins_unamerican/
October 7, 2008 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was disappointed to see that you got rec'd for this.
As far as I can tell you are trying to bend reality to fit your belief system...something that you want to hold on to whether it is true or not.
If in your 'reality' you need for Senator Obama to be 'a bad guy'...then you are going wrap reality around your beliefs... This is the reason that barring 'facts'(not their interpretations or distortions) are perhaps a tricky thing for you that you would like to avoid.
Isn't it interesting that even though we are referred to by some as a 'hive' that we are still willing to check the facts when you express an opinion... I wish that made you more interested in posting based on facts... because there's only so many times people are going to read your blogs when your information if your information is never substantiated.
I am curious...have you read any of the 'fact' based information on this site about Senator McCain? Did you learn anything?
October 8, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
A rec is not a popularity contest. A rec means worthy of attention.
This post is worthy of attention for several reasons.
First, it's a challenge to the community to debate a key issue that your undecided or GOP friends will, no doubt, bring up. Having a clear set of coherent answers is much better than rolling your eyes and screaming "Rovian tactics".
The second reason is that CleverBulldog has made a lot of inane comments over the past few weeks and now we have a thread to constantly remind him that he has zero credibility.
Bookmark and use!
October 8, 2008 4:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment