Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Sidney Schanberg & The Nation: McCain and the POW Cover-up

avatar

Some provocative reading from the always interesting Sidney Schanberg, courtesy of the folks at The Nation:


John McCain, who has risen to political prominence on his image as a Vietnam POW war hero, has, inexplicably, worked very hard to hide from the public stunning information about American prisoners in Vietnam who, unlike him, didn't return home. Throughout his Senate career, McCain has quietly sponsored and pushed into federal law a set of prohibitions that keep the most revealing information about these men buried as classified documents. Thus the war hero who people would logically imagine as a determined crusader for the interests of POWs and their families became instead the strange champion of hiding the evidence and closing the books.

Almost as striking is the manner in which the mainstream press has shied from reporting the POW story and McCain's role in it, even as the Republican Party has made McCain's military service the focus of his presidential campaign. Reporters who had covered the Vietnam War turned their heads and walked in other directions. McCain doesn't talk about the missing men, and the press never asks him about them.

The sum of the secrets McCain has sought to hide is not small. There exists a telling mass of official documents, radio intercepts, witness depositions, satellite photos of rescue symbols that pilots were trained to use, electronic messages from the ground containing the individual code numbers given to airmen, a rescue mission by a special forces unit that was aborted twice by Washington—and even sworn testimony by two Defense secretaries that "men were left behind." This imposing body of evidence suggests that a large number—the documents indicate probably hundreds—of the US prisoners held by Vietnam were not returned when the peace treaty was signed in January 1973 and Hanoi released 591 men, among them Navy combat pilot John S. McCain.

Here's a link to the full (and lengthy) essay:

http://www.nationinstitute.org/p/schanberg09182008pt1


Comments (1)

avatar

If what this article is saying is true rather than a trumped up partisan screed to attack McCain than why is there no mention of John Kerry? At every step on the path of normalizing relations with Vietnam and dealing with the possibility of POWs still left in Vietnam Kerry and McCain worked hand in hand. It was a bipartisan effort of 2 men both of whom fought in Vietnam and had honorable records there, it couldn't have been done any other way. In fact the effort to normalize relations was begun by Bill Clinton. The democrats could never have done it without republican participation. McCain and Kerry backed each other up all the way. Both declared there were no POWs left in Vietnam. Both declared that there were extensive investigations and no evidence was found. If McCain was truly involved in a cover up then Kerry was his co-conspirator.

Why no mention in this article of John Kerry?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address