« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Gramm and McCain vs Obama and Ayers
Harold Meyerson explains in WaPo why Gramm is so relevant to a potentian McCain administration as opposed to the irrelevancy of Ayers to an Obama administration.
The former has been McCains advisor on economic issues for decades--while the latter once stood in line at Starbucks while Obama was getting an espresso, or waved to him on the street, or passed him in the bakery aisle at Whole Foods.
In other words, the difference between a close confederate schemer--and a passing acquaintance. And while we are on the subject of wacky reverends--I don't remember seeing any video of African Shamans laying hands upon Obama to innoculate him against demons and witchcraft--so, why does Sarah-I-got-my-copy-of-the-liberal-NY-Times want to go there? Has she not just invited her church going practices to become publicly scrutinized in greater detail? I mean, if you think that Wasilla is THE special place to go to survive the Apocalypse--isn't that something the voters need to be fully debriefed about?
Comments (3)
And what's this about Wasilla being the meth capital of Alaska? Whose the mixer, whose the dealer?
October 6, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Palin wants to bring up Ayers to show Obama is consorting with a domestic terrorist, Obama merely needs to reference Palin's husband's association with the Alaskan recessionist party, whose Dear Leader is on record stating he hated America, and came to an early demise when plastic explosives reorganized his internal organs. Palin is treading on thin ice (thinned by a natural warming cycle, or by man?)
October 6, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, the Alaska secessionist Party should be brought up every time Wright is mentioned.
October 6, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment