Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

What's with these White People?

Yes, tell me what's with these white people, especially democrats and particularly Hillary supporters? Why can't they support Barack and the party and cast their vote for the democratic ticket?

Why would they even think of shifting to McCain when they know quite well that he supports none of their values? Are they telling me so openly that they cannot support Obama just because he is black?

Isn't that extremely unfair? Look how many years blacks have supported every white democratic candidate? The party is reportedly the party of the blacks. The blacks even anointed white Bill Clinton as the first "black" president.

Are you telling me that after so many years of staunch support from blacks that these white people, men and women cannot support a black man? Can they not return the favor at least once? Can they not help a man out at such a critical juncture in US history? Am I to believe that blacks must be relegated to being a support group for white people but cannot ask white people to support them?

Something is woefully wrong here and all those democratic white people who would support McCain or stay away from the polls because of Obama should be ashamed of themselves. How sad.. how racist.. how much lower can we go?

This is even worse than the McCain lies and smears.






Comments (52)

That is one utterly ridiculous post.

Let's wait and see what the actual women's support for Obama will be. It may be wise not to disenfranchise women as we did during the primaries but to continue lobbying for their support. I'm all for venting after the election though.

Is this a serious comment?

It's just so bizarre that I have a hard time believing it's not a joke.

Dr. Martin Luther King (a true hero) said in his "I have a Dream" speech that he "...hoped his children would grow up in a nation in which a person was judged not by the color of their skin but by the contents of their character..."

If white people are voting for a white person solely because of the color of their skin, THAT IS RACISM. SHAME ON THEM.

If black people are voting for a black person solely because of the color of their skin, THAT IS RACISM. SHAME ON THEM.

We should be voting on character, on policy, on the ideal of doing the right thing, of doing something greater than our individual self.

Color should be off the table.

In choosing between Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton, I did not see a black man, nor did I see a white woman. I looked at who I thought would be the best American to lead us out of the tragedy that these last 8 years have become.

If you ask me to support Sen. Obama solely on the color of his skin, then the dream of MLK would in part have died.

I will not allow that dream to die. I cannot allow the dream to die. The stakes are too high.

As President Clinton said, I still believe in a place called HOPE.


Dr. Martin Luther King (a true hero) said in his "I have a Dream" speech that he "...hoped his children would grow up in a nation in which a person was judged not by the color of their skin but by the contents of their character..."

If white people are voting for a white person solely because of the color of their skin, THAT IS RACISM. SHAME ON THEM.

If black people are voting for a black person solely because of the color of their skin, THAT IS RACISM. SHAME ON THEM.

We should be voting on character, on policy, on the ideal of doing the right thing, of doing something greater than our individual self.

Color should be off the table.

In choosing between Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton, I did not see a black man, nor did I see a white woman. I looked at who I thought would be the best American to lead us out of the tragedy that these last 8 years have become.

If you ask me to support Sen. Obama solely on the color of his skin, then the dream of MLK would in part have died.

I will not allow that dream to die. I cannot allow the dream to die. The stakes are too high.

As President Clinton said, I still believe in a place called HOPE.


What white people?

I'm white. I love Obama - he is everything I want in a president. He's so calm under pressure, he is so smart and he really cares. He has great ideas and he is our future. I think he's fucking gift to this country.

And many white people feel just like I do.


Many.

I would say most not just many. This post is directed at a small, though vocal, minority in this country that is nearly extinct. Otherwise, Barack wouldn't be the nominee.

If you saw that video of West Virginian voters you wouldn't say the post was rediculous. Shit was disparraging to say the least.

the sheriff's a ni$$er.

I know white people in their late 60's and 70's in Virginia who are lifelong democrats who say they just can't bring themselves to vote for a black man.

They'll get the president they deserve. This giant swath of hopelessly vapid voters young and old don't want to be informed. They want to be entertained.

Secession may be the only answer. If you are a democrat and live in a red state move to a blue state.

This will get ugly. And judging from the no talent American Idol candidate Palin we'll probably end up with McCain and Palin and they can inherit the biggest economic shitshow since the great depression. Fuck them and anyone who votes for them. They deserve each other.

O stop that shit right now.

This post has shamed me and, as I speak for all white people, I will now confidently proclaim our unanimous support for Senator Obama.

But wait! The shame is so great that I will now go on record for all white people of Illinois and admit to a complete boycott of the Obama-Keyes Illinois Senate race in 2004. We had nobody we could vote for due to our collective racism.

My (our) apologies.

It is Generational Racism. It will take a Generational Election to eradicate it - make the racists irrelevant.

Most of us don't understand it because we weren't raised from birth to feel it. But it is real. People hate because they are envious, they believe that other people unlike them have something that they themselves deserve.

It the same reason Evangelicals couldn't support a Mormon - it is bias, it is fear, it is the root of evil.

I'm white, I was raised in a very diverse city by my mom who grew up in Detroit during the 60's,. She witnessed hate on the college campuses of Michigan, she knows it's evil, regardless of the rationalization.

I was taught to recognize hate and never tolerate it.

As a white person, I've encountered other white people who thinks it's okay to spew racism because I must think like them - must I?

Tell these people they are racists, tell these people you wouldn't have them watch your dog, let alone talk to your children, tell these people that they don't speak for you, tell these people to shutthefuckup because they are embarrassing themselves.

What is it that a black president might do that people object to? Can anyone name one thing that a black would do but a white would not?

He might have embarassingly better rose garden picnics? I can just imagine a full on black family reunion style picnic on the white house lawn. It makes me smile. Black people are better at picnics, barbaque ribs and chicken halves, greens, watermelon, good macaroni and cheese, maybe some gumbo if hes got some cousins from downriver (I know hes not actually from chicago but hell you can wish he has family from louisana when you're dreaming of picnics right). I get sick of old money white people with mint juleps and cheese trays.

I know this is all stereotypical as hell but I was just trying to make a point. Barack is black, who gives a shit. Black people and white people are a little different, culturally, but it makes absolutely no difference in how that man could run the white house. I know from my own personal experience I have a hell of a lot more fun around middle class black people than I do around rich old white people. Poor/middle class white people have a lot more in common with black people than they do with rich people. I laugh when I hear BillO and foxnfriends say class warfare on the air. They're praying people never figure out the commonality, because if we were all comfortable with each other we could control things, and that scares the shit out of rich people.

He might change the legal system that values young white men above young black men.

In fact, I hope he does.

You know what, Bel? I can never figure white people out either.

And I'm white.

Keep hope alive, though. Cause we're learnin'. And we'll get there.

C'mon, Quinn - don't encourage her - she'll think she's clever.

What a patronizing remark. Here, let me translate: "Yes, tell me what's with these Canadians, especially left coast ones and particularly Canucks supporters?"

The answer is simple. Go. Fuck. Your. Self.

No Des, I think she's hurting and I can understand why. I can understand how someone could live in a country where prejudice still exists and could want something so much and see how it might slip away.

People always want to grasp at a simple reason. Look at how many did it in 2000. It was all Nader's fault.

I have this vision of Gore standing in front of a firing squad with a pistol in his hand pointed at his head. The guns fire and he pulls the trigger. When he's dead everyone points at Nader and says, "You killed him."

Sure Nader was a factor, one of many, but imo the biggest reason Gore lost was the MSM created a lie and convinced the people it was the truth. The biggest part of that lie that Gore was a serial liar/exaggerator and they made up several lies to support that narrative.

But its easier to find a scapegoat to blame.

Yeah, but we've been preassigning the blame since February or March. How convenient. Damn those white people for actually choosing for themselves what candidate they want instead of picking the black man automatically. Bel may be in pain, but she's making my head hurt.

Of course racism has an effect on this election. But defining Obama's problems solely on racism is simplistic. Democrats deserted the party in droves and voted for Reagan twice. They then voted for bush the first. Was Carter or Mondale or Dukakis not white enough? Gore lost, Kerry lost. Were they too black for the racist whites to elect?

If Obama was a white man do you really think 90% of black americans would have voted for him? Or would that vote have been split between Hillary and Obama?

If Obama was a white man how many blacks would have said he's too inexperienced and Bill was good for black people? How many would have voted for Hillary? If you can answer these question honestly then you must admit there are reasons other than race to vote against Obama.

Well many white people are saying he's too inexperienced and McCain showed honor and character when he was a POW and an independent streak as senator. As well as having years of experience in national politics.

If Obama loses racism will be one of the reasons. But the biggest reason will be that he jumped the gun. He ran for president before he had built up a resume sufficient to convince the people to trust him as president. He ran before he had taken steps to separate himself from a politically damaging association. He thought he could do it all on charisma.

But none of that matters. If he loses many will blame it all on racism.

Actually if he loses it will be because we have a MAJORITY of idiots in this country. This is race is as much of a referendum on the American people than on either candidate.

It is every 4 years. And every 4 years they either surprise me by choosing to go along with my sensible choice, or disappoint me by picking an idiot. You'd think they'd learn.

I really don't think people who would've voted for Hillary in the general election are jumping ship. I'm sure their crowds have been getting juiced by evangelicals and curiousity seekers, but any woman who is going to vote for McCain/Palin wouldn't have voted for Obama (or Hillaryin the GE) anyway.

Whats wrong with these black people? Why is it that black people are upset with a black man, that they'll likely vote for him but are none too happy with the lack of attention to issues they hold dear? Why can't they accept their place out of the limelight, understand that it's inconvenient for them to be too prominent right now? Why can't they just smile and shuffle on?

This is the most important election in my life, probably the most important since 1932. In my opinion, the United States needs Barack Obama right now as much as it needed Washington, Lincoln and FDR. I don't want to believe that race is an issue but it is foolish to think that in some places it isn't. Shame, shame, shame on those who make it so.

Before and during the primaries I viewed the Democratic Party as facing the perfect dilemma:

1. Vote with tradition: for a white --

who happened to be female.

Or:

2. Vote with tradition: for a man --

who happened to be black.

The perfect opportunity for progress, and no way over, around, or under it.

Unprecedented progress, regardless outcome: elect a black, or elect a woman.

So what's the beef?

On the "experience" canard:

Obama has as much experience as did a person named Abraham Lincoln when he became president.

Which matters more? -- experience, or judgment? Give me good judgment, and the experience will follow. McSame has "experience," but his judgment, if it exists, SUCKS.

That's the canard. Anyone who did just a little research into Lincoln's biography will quickly see that Lincoln was far more experienced. For example both were lawyers. But Lincoln argued over 400 cases before the Illinois Supreme Court as a lawyer. What of any significance did obama do as a lawyer?

Lincoln may have just been a Illinois legislator but even there he was nationally know. The Lincoln Douglass debates where transcribed into all the major newspapers of the time. What did Obama do while an Illinois legislator that had any impact nationally?

Lincoln took risky positions against the Mexican American war and against slavery and he didn't do it just once but over and over again to the detriment of is political career at times. Obama made one speech against the Iraq war in Hyde Park the most liberal district in Illinois. Hard to even call that risky.

Even if they had exactly the same amount of time of experience Lincoln used that time in much more substantial ways and got a national reputation because of it.

And so how do you explain people voting for George W. Bush? Was it based on his vast "experience" as a former president's son?

Was it because of W.'s honor and character, as shown when he deserted and/or quit the National Guard to work on a campaign? Was it because of all of his years of experience in the federal government? His many successful business ventures?

No -- it was because people said they'd rather have a beer with him than with Al Gore, who was made out to be a liar by the mainstream media despite all of the good federal government experience he had as a Senator a sitting VP.

Then it turned out that Bush himself was a gigantic liar, and a spectacular failure as a president in just about any way you'd care to measure, but you can't report on that during a war. That would be unpatriotic.

You are right that racism and the experience issue will both be just part of the equation in this election, but another large part is that people vote based on Hollywood stories, personal prejudices, preference for "people like me" rather than elitists -- heaven forbid that smart people hold the most imprtant jobs in the world, after all. We'd rather have a guy like W. who went to Yale and Harvard but still managed to be a dumbshit anyhow. We'd rather have a mom who took six years and six schools to get a degree, not a person who also has middle class roots but actually got a good education anyway.

As others have indicated above, the people deserve the candidate they elect.

And so how do you explain people voting for George W. Bush? Was it based on his vast "experience" as a former president's son?
---------------------------------------------------

Look, I didn't vote for Bush and I think he is the worst president in at least my lifetime if not the history of America. But why lie? Why attempt to create a caricature? Why list his experience as "a former presidents son?" Are you this ignorant of Bush's biography?

Bush was a well liked and highly successful Governor, at least he was so considered by the people of Texas. The only governor in Texas history to win 2 consecutive terms. He won re-election with 69% of the vote.

You force me to defend a man I despise by the partisan hackery of referring to him as a "former president's son" when he was the twice elected governor of Texas. You force me to do this because my first allegiance is to the truth as best as I can perceive it and not to any candidate.

Palin in many ways seems to be a ridiculous choice for vp. But people make the same mistake when they constantly refer to her as the former mayor of a small town. She's the governor of Alaska.

I'll point out what a partisan hack you are by asking you the same ignorant and ridiculous question you posed. "How do you explain people voting for (obama)? Was it based on his vast "experience" as a former president (of the Harvard law review)?"

Are you interested in serious dialog or do you want the discussion to be that asinine?

On the "experience" canard:

Obama has as much experience as did a person named Abraham Lincoln when he became president.

Which matters more? -- experience, or judgment? Give me good judgment, and the experience will follow. McSame has "experience," but his judgment, if it exists, SUCKS.

Bel,

An Obama administration scares the hell out of people who see themselves as the last bulwark of white political control of this country. Sadly, it's not just the members of my political party who believe this; the Clintons repeatedly riffed on this theme with some success during the primaries. As I'm old enough to remember the sixties and seventies, I remember when the governing experience bar was set lower for white presidential candidates. Based on today's so-called standards, Bobby Kennedy was "too inexperienced" to run for office.

The "Bradley Effect" is real and I doubt that the so-called McCain bump would exist if McCain had picked Bobby Jindal as his running mate. Also, I suspect the real reason why the Obama campaign avoids direct confrontation with McCain/Palin surrogates is to avoid having Obama labeled as the "scary black guy" who attacked a white Christian hockey mom.

witty1,

As a former Mormon, I have to disagree. A core tenet of Mormonism is the establishment of an LDS temporal and spiritual theocracy over the entire world starting within the United States. The Saints weren't driven out of Independence, Missouri or Nauvoo, Illinois because of their neighborly habits. Try researching information on the State of Deseret and the Mormon colonies in Canada and Mexico. Then read up on the "White Horse Prophecy" and Mitt Romney's family history in the Mexican colonies. For all practical purposes, Utah was and is a theocracy (with the exception of a few pockets of resistance). The political power and influence of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is far greater in this country than most non-members can even comprehend and Romney is far more dangerous than you'll ever know.

O no - I get that very well.

The LDS was political right from the start, always intended to have a member elected president, right from the start, and I know that they own Utah, I know they're dangerous.

They really are.

If you're asking this question non-rhetorically, you've chosen the wrong board to post it on.

I'd be willing to bet 98% of white posters here support Obama, including myself.

If you're asking the question rhetorically, I can't imagine what kind of response you're fishing for.

It's a straw (wo)man. Nobody has produced any evidence of who these putative voters might be, nor how many of them there are. During the campaign, there were some shrill Clinton supporters who declared on blog comment lists that they would switch to McCain ... but how serious was that threat?

Of course, she appealed to a lot of center-right voters who are unlikely to move left enough to support a Democratic candidate under other conditions. And most people don't seem to realize that Barack Obama is far from a progressive left candidate. Absent Hillary Clinton in the campaign, those voters would not even have been on the Democratic radar.

Thanks.

mp

I can tell you that living in a small city outside of Columbus Ohio and I am seeing overt racism in the reaction of some people toward Obama and this is something that is not being talked about and why I think he will have a hard time being elected president. I am an Obama supporter (and a white 47 year old male) and am very troubled by what I am seeing and actually confronted someone at a local community event in August who had written on the back of his SUV "Fuck Obama." This guy told me he was a proud redneck and that if the guy was elected someone would kill him before he would be sworn in. Also in Upper Arlington Ohio, a white, affluent, subdivision of Columbus a woman had sprayed painted on wall in her drive way kill Obama after she had an Obama sign placed in her yard. If you want a historical context to add to what has already been mentioned, remember the women's movement split when black men were given the right to vote after the Civil War because some in the movement were angry at the fact that black men got the right to vote before women did.

I believe race is not being talked about enough as a factor in this election and have seen overt signs of racism in the small community I live in a small community outside of Columbus, OH. I am a white male age 47 and confronted a man at a local community festival last month when he had written on the back of his SUV "Fuck Obama." He told me he was a proud redneck and that if Obama was elected someone would kill him before he was sworn in. In upper Arlington, OH, an affluent white subdivision of Columbus, a woman had kill Obama spray painted on the wall edging her drive way after she put an Obama yard sign up. Race is coming in to play and I fear in a close election this will make the difference.

Remember also historically the women's movement split after the Civil War when black men were given the right to vote before white women so there is some historical context here when it comes to gender.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

Oh, for the love of Sister Mary Francis....

I really hope Obama wins because there will be NO END to drivel like this, even in "reputable" newspapers and on TV, about how a racist America just wasn't ready for a black President, and the spectre of the Jim Crowe South had risen up to show its ugly face.

(Nevermind the fact that the Obama campaign has been consistently out performed and out maneuvered by the Rethugs.)

Ay ay ay!

I cannot speak for all West Virginians/Appalachians, but I believe that the “racism’ element here is due more to life experience ignorance as opposed to mental ignorance/stupidity or a “hatred” of others unlike themselves.

I am a proud and loyal West Virginia, born and raised, the beneficiary of an underrated and tremendous West Virginia public education system which gets little of the credit it deserves, holder of a business degree and law degree from WVU (long before the Manchin/Bresch/ Garrison fiasco). I have also had the benefit of living and working outside of WV for 15 years, including ten in Miami, Florida, a microcosm of the world, and a fabulous part of my life. I have worked in small town, big city, for the federal government, and for one of the best corporations in the world. I have traveled to Europe a couple of times. I have a mix of values that others would describe as conservative and liberal, which I describe and will argue with anyone as common sense.

I love this state in ways not possible had I not satisfied my own worldly curiosities first. I love the ocean but it does not compare to the substance, spirit and love that comes from the strength of family that living in our mountains, hills, and hollers has cultivated for most of our people.

I personally have been a supporter of Barack Obama since I heard his speech at the 2004 Democratic convention. The more I watch him and listen to him ( I actually listen to full length speeches as opposed to sound bites ) the more I am convinced that Barack Obama is our only choice for the change that this country needs at this time and place in history.

The latent but substantive racial element that I see and feel is the product not of racism for the sake of racism but of not knowing blacks and others different from 95% of other West Virginians. I can admit to having to leave WV before fully realizing that we are all truly born equal. Most West Virginians I know in today’s world who actually live and work with neighbors of different color treat them as equal. Obviously, those demographic numbers are small.

There are other factors that might affect West Virginians' thought processes. Except for our capital city’s morning newspaper, the Charleston Gazette, the state’s political coverage is either Fox News or Fox News like or the AP and otherwise conservative. There is a serious socio-cultural-historic divide between the northern half of the state and the southern half of the state: large numbers of third generation Italian/eastern European.Roman Catholic immigrants in the northern half and multiple generation Anglo/Scot/Irish Protestants in the southern half. The southern half is hugely dependent on coal mining with the northern half of more mixed economy. Sadly, many of our college educated have left the state over the last 30-40 years for better economic opportunities. Throw in the pressure of the media and the peer pressure of some, Barack Obama’s failure to spend little time or money in WV ( which I was disappointed to see), the primary election was for many West Virginians, I will admit, an unfortunate exercise to vote for the white woman over the black man.

However, one should not assume that WV voters will do the same thing in November and automatically vote for the Republican McCain over the black Democrat. West Virginians as a whole are smarter than the rest of the world thinks and many understand the stakes. Many of us feel defrauded by the Bushies and West Virginians have a high proportion of their sons and daughters in the military. Although the state voted red in 2000 and 2004 many will this time around are better educated as to the propaganda that has been foisted upon us the last eight years, and many will recall their historic Democratic Party ties. No doubt some voted strictly on racial lines and they will support McCain in any event.

Given enough effort and education by the Democratic party going into November, many Hillary supporters and independents will vote blue. West Virginians historically have pledged allegiance to the Democratic party and it is still difficult for a West Virginian to vote for a Republican. The question will be, as with any swing state, is what the voters do inside the election booth. I believe, contrary to the opinion of many, West Virginia’s three electoral votes are still in play. Anecdotally, I have been quite surprised at a number of people who quietly, but confidently, tell me that they have had “Enough” and will vote for Obama.

The following poll, conducted by a former staffer for twice elected Republican Cecil Underwood (1956 and 1996) is supportive of my views:

http://www.wsaz.com/political/headlines/28118604.html

17% undecided is a big number around here, and many of us are working hard and gearing up for this last push to get them to vote for Obama.

It is not time to panic and there are plenty of places around the country ripe for surprise. Besides, we don’t like lipstick on our pigs around here either.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I agree with you . I have relatives in Canton, Ohio and the attitudes are much the same among white, working class voters like my family. Now with McCain's running mate it's likely white, working class women will again become their own worst enemies. The nomination of Palin allows bigotted people to justify a vote against their own interests. This election is revealing the ugly truth about our collective national character. Down deep we are still struggling with our racism. The dishonorable tactics of the McCain and his campaign have been tapping into this everyday, all day. A black man calling a white woman a pig? Can you imagine the outrage expressed in little white community coffee shops all across the land? Where were the major Democratic women's voices during the media frenzy yesterday? Every woman with a feminist bone in her body should be expressing outrage everyday, all day at Palin's brand of feminism. Now the election has gone beyond race to the very real possibility that working class women will aid and abet angry,white men, through the false promise that Palin symbolizes, to the less enlightened 1950's America.

I'm white, pro Hillary. Barry Hussein Obama, the son of an African drunk! John McCain war hero, son of a US Naval Admiral.

McCain/Bimbo 2008; Clinton 2012.

Hey judiadg....do you agree or not?

John McCain war hero, son of a US Naval Admiral.

What did John McCain do that was heroic during the war?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address