« "We Have a Source for Every One of Our Lies" | The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve's Blog | We Can't be the Grownups if We Act Like Children »

The Fate of the Republic is at Stake


I have been working on this diary, on and off, all weekend, writing and deleting, honing and  editing.  I've been trying to  keep it from sounding like the ravings of some drama queen alarmist or that guy wearing the filthy parka in the park in August preaching that the end of the world is nigh.  I've been worried about that because something came to me this week with something like the lunatic clarity of a prophetic vision and, given that, it was actually a relief to see that Josh  and Edsal over at Huffpo got there first. 

What hit me this week is that everything that I have been working for, hoping for, and, in my own slack way, fighting for over these last nineteen months no longer matters.  Health care, income inequality, reconciliation between black and white and red and blue, global warming, energy less-dependence, killing Bin Laden before he dies of old age, even ending the Iraq War--none of it matters anymore.   McCain's decision to ink his deal with the devil, cast aside every last vestige of his integrity and run a campaign brazenly predicated upon the outright denial of the existence of objective reality has turned this into an election that will determine whether democracy will continue to exist in this country in any meaningful way. 

The older I've gotten, the more I've come to disdain the use of hyperbolic superlatives in political discourse.  They are generally counterproductive rhetorical devices and  they can all too easily cause you to end up looking ridiculous in hindsight.  Superlatives like  "most important election ever" are driven by worst care scenarios that, historically speaking,  usually fail to materialize.  So when I hear people make melodramatic statements like "this campaign represents the climactic  battle of good versus evil that will decide the fate of the galaxy for ten thousand years to come!" I  am predisposed to roll my eyes and say, "yeah, right, spare me the drama 'cause in five years we won't even remember  why we thought this was a big deal."   So please understand that I myself find it a bit odd that I feel compelled to log on to the Internet and tell untold thousands of strangers that, with all that lunatic prophetic clarity I mentioned above, I believe this has become the most  important election since 1932, and that it may even be the most important  election since 1860. 

As of the first night of the Republican Convention, the stakes in this election have quite simply become whether democracy survive into 2009, or whether it will lurch along as a golem,  animated corpse.  The issue is whether we will have at least a chance of retaining a meaningful democracy or whether it becomes a Putinized sham retaining the forms of democracy as a means of conferring legitimacy upon a plutocracy that controls the outcome through partisan propaganda that is completely decoupled from objective reality. 

The process by which we have been brought to this juncture has been unfolding in plain sight for thirty years.  Over that time, they have progressively decertified the press--treated it not as something critical to the functioning of our society whose role is enshrined in the first amendment we made to our Constitution but, instead, as just another interest group to be satiated or ignored at whim.  They've accomplished this through the combination of their relentless assault on the so-called liberal bias of the media, the destruction of the FCC rules defining the "public interest" as serving the interests of the public rather than just spewing "content" into the air, and the steady relaxation of the rules restricting cross-ownership.  As they grew bigger and fatter, the media companies themselves willingly became complicit in their own demise as independent checks upon concentrated power.  At the same time, as a direct consequence of the Republican Party's long term media decertification project, the Republican base has become ever more willing, and mentally trained, to apply whatever doublethink is necessary to believe any lie told by their leaders, no matter how outrageous.  We've all seen it happening, we've all groused about the various parts of it, but we failed to see it as a whole and did not perceive the slow progression.  We, and our democracy, were  like the proverbial frog in the pot slowly brought to boil.  We kept adjusting to the "new normal" instead of noticing we were being boiled alive and jumping out. 

Now, at last, they have achieved their dream of a campaign based upon unabashed lies about themselves and their opponents, upon reason-free emotionalism, and, of course, upon fear and grievance.  McCain's campaign this year is the final distillation of the theory and practice of politics as developed by the Republicans over the last thirty years.   At last, in positively Orwellian fashion, they feel they've reached a point with all their various projects that they finally just say to the Press, and to the Democrats, "fuck you!  We can say anything we want, do anything we want, promise anything we want, slander anyone we want.  We can say black is white, love is hate, war is peace, freedom is slavery, and 2+2=5, and you can't stop us!  We can shit on the white working class and tell them its manna from heaven and they won't believe you when you tell them its not."   They think that the MSM and the Democrats have become so weak and so despised that they can sell empty cereal boxes based solely upon its packaging and a vicious campaign of libelling the competitor's cereal..  (Though, lest we dispair, let us not forget that they've got no choice but to try it this year because they got nothing else to offer.) 

And if they win this way, particularly if they win in the face of the kind of campaign premised upon ending precisely the kind of politics the Republicans have bet the farm on, you know, and I know, that the Democrats will throw away every last vestige of scruples and respond in kind in 2012.  And at that point, the Republic is well and truly screwed because there will be no brakes, no constraints on what either party can say or do to get and retain power. 

Can you imagine any good ending to that scenario?  All I can imagine are bad ones.  Scenarios in which two morally and intellectually bankrupt parties with no real objectives other than getting and keeping  power.  They'll fight even more bitterly as the stakes get smaller and the differences between them fade and then, eventually, just merge into an amorphous plutocracy that runs shadow puppet partisan elections to make the mob feel like their call is important.  Bread and circus--minimum wage jobs and war--naturally become the currency of power, the dissolution of the middle class becomes inevitable and, in all likelihood, environmental and societal collapse follow.  A government whose legitimacy rests entirely on glib promises of easy solutions to simple problems cannot solve global warming or curb a ballooning deficit. 

As he left Independence Hall on the last day of deliberations of the Constitutional Convention, an unknown lady asked Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”"  Franklin's answer--already cited here by someone else last week was this:

  “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

Typical Franklin, both an answer to the question and an injunction to posterity--us, that is to say.  That's what's at stake here.  If we win this one, if we stand up and prove that objective reality does matter, that it is actually true that truth will out, then maybe, just maybe, the Republicans rise from the ashes of their defeat and say "hey, maybe deconstructionist nihilism isn't  tactically fruitful." Maybe then they reexamine themselves and become a party again rather than a metastatic tumor on the two party system.   If we win, we may be able to keep it.  If we lose . . .

That's what matters now.    Not health care, not stopping the war in Iraq, not jobs, not the price of gas.  Global warming doesn't matter now.  FISA doesn't matter now.  What happened to Hillary in the primaries, whether she gets a chance to run again in 2012 and unprovable beliefs that she would have been a better candidate don't matter anymore.  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and Lehman don't matter.  Indeed,  whether you love him or hate him, even Obama doesn't matter anymore either and neither does McCain.  The only issue that matters now is the nihilistic monstrosity that is McCain's campaign.  If it wins, this election is all too likely to be the place where future historians draw the line and say "this is where the American experiment in democracy ended." 

We simply don't have the luxury anymore of ironic detachment, or arguing about the past  or about tactics, or even about whether the MSM will wake up in time to the fact that if the McCain campaign wins, it means the end of journalism.  The reason we no longer have that luxary is not because we're a little behind in the polls, but because gambling addict John McCain  just went all in--his soul plus everything we hold dear, and he put it all on black.

46 Comments

| Leave a comment

Very good post, as always.

What is the resulting injunction?

Something like: Work hard for 51 days [and any recount period] to expose what McCain's doing and to persuade a majority of voters that his campaign is a mendacious, unprincipled, power-desperate freak -- a "nihilistic monstrosity." Hammer away at that monster in every way within your power for 51 days and then see where we all end up.

I remain very confident it will be little place they call victory.

You've cut through so much of the bullshit, NC Steve. Excellent post.
The idea of democratic government will soldier on around the world, even if America falls. But the task will be so much harder, the risks so much greater.
With trepidation, I've been watching this drama unfold for nearly eight years from just north of the border.
What I sense is that Obama gets it -- that the Orwellian tide has to be stopped now, or everything is lost.
That half the U.S. electorate is blind to this -- thinks this election is just politics as usual -- stuns the hell out of me.
Yeah, it's not about FISA, or Supreme Court appointees, or about protectionism and free trade.
It's about constitutional government.
The rule of law.
Life, liberty and the whole nine yards.
If the American experiment fails, we'll do our best to keep the flame alive.
It will just be a whole lot harder.

I agree mostly with your post, but the idea that the shrinking neoconservative base represents "half the electorate" is a meme of the highest order.

We had the highest turnout since 1968 in 2004 at 60.7%. At best, 30 percent of America is fooled, though I suspect that number is even lower given the trends from the primaries.

I do think you're right. We have put all the pieces into place for a surprise-the-pollsters win. I think we have 30-35% who the the some of the people who can be fooled all the time + an varying x% who can be fooled some of the time and I think by increaqsing the size of the pool through registration and GOTV, we've diminished the percentage of the x factor to the point that the fooled all the timers + x

The problem I'm seeing--and living down here I see it up close and personal--is that the formerly demoralized theocrats are back in the race and they're in full bore slaughter the heathern crusader mode. Their demoralization was our margin of error and that margin of error is what gave us the luxuary of bickering with each other about tactics and strategy and policy. It's what gave some people here the luxuary of looking on with haughty ironic detachment, relishing a nasty schadenfreude at every down turn in Obama's poll numbers. Its what gave the Emocrats the luxuary to indulge themselves with handwringing and second guessing.

When the fundies were demoralized and temporarily disengaged from their rather sacreligious mission to bring us all the Kingdom of God on Earth whether we want it or not, we could afford to lose whatever votes slipped through our fingers because our (i.e. Democrats') customary disunity and emoting was a turn-off. And we probably still can afford to lose those votes. What's changed is that I don't believe we have room to take that chance because the stakes have suddenly become too high. The election is no longer about whether we end up with a continuation of their disasterous policies or a change to our better ones. Its now about whether we still have a functioning democracy in 2012 or whether we have the kind of sham described by Ray Bradbury in Fahrenheit 451.

I have no doubt that the "fundies" in your neck of the woods are fired up by Palin, but the evangelical movement in this country is split into a couple of different pieces, so the damage to the margin or error isn't as great as it might of been in 2004 or 2000.

The votes that are splitting from the Rapture Right on bigger issues than the single serving social issues, are going to Obama. I call them the Carter Evangelicals. I believe they are a much bigger percentage then they have been given credit for up until now.

I think this year is pivotal all around and Obama's landslide victory will be made up of equal parts right-leaning and progressive independents, thoroughly disgusted republicans in traditionally red states (the people who gave Barack a 25 point win in Georgia and 50 points in Idaho) and new voters from around the country.

The polls see none of these people. Hell, the polls don't even consider me a likely Voter this year and wouldn't be able to reach me if they did.

It's going to be a shocker of epic proportions.

From your keyboard to God's ear....

Not sure he is reading my stuff. I am a non believer. :O)

Hmmmmm...If I could be at all instrumental in getting you to register as a Republican, I wonder if I could convert you to Jesus? Can we talk?

I firmly agree with much of your analysis. I think the "Experiment of American Democracy" is better seen as an "experiment well constructed but inflexible winner-take-all government". Our two party state is a sad affair, and Parliamentary systems are probably preferable. I'm sad that it seems impossible for the USA to transition to a system where anarchists, communists, fascists, libertarians, and greens can have a fair say.

Furthermore, the lack of voices and nature of our precedents has led to concentrations of power in the Presidential Office. Imagine what life would be like now if Clinton had gotten his line item veto? Bush would be de-facto dictator.

I never really thought of how nihilistic our culture is until reading your arguments, and I suggest the description "materialistic christian nihilism" to describe much of right wing culture here.

However, what you have said should be tempered with a few grains of salt.

First of all, Dems are poised for yet another batch of gains in congress. At the state level, Obama's registration drives have tipped the balance across the country, so that even more in state and local than congressional elections, an enormous batch of gains stand to be made by dems.

Secondly, my money is on Obama to win this election. McCain might "win" through rigging at the ballot box, fait accompli by the media, or any number of other tricks. Any way it happens, there will be serious unrest because good men cannot sit idly by as wickedness transpires, and because many right wingers seem to have lost all concept of playing fair. Obama would have to have a serious malfunction to not have some plan of action for this part of the game. For one thing, he is guaranteed some positive face time, despite the media's efforts, just because the election is coming up and people will think of it. Biden is not emphasized by Obama or the media, but that's okay because Obama is much more interesting and healthy than McCain.

user-pic

Nice job once again, Steve.

I liked the reference to Putin. In a recent TV news (20/20? 60 minutes?) story about Russia, an interviewer asked opposition leader Gary Kasparov why he didn't just give it up, with Putin's approval ratings around 90 percent.

Kasparov said, "If Bush had complete control of all the media in your country, he would have a 90 percent approval rating, too."

That's where we're headed, make no mistake.

And your "money quote" was dead on:

"The only issue that matters now is the nihilistic monstrosity that is McCain's campaign."

So true. But for all those people who are beginning to despair, don't. I truly believe we are still in the midst of a "Palin bounce" that WILL subside in time. And even THAT only brought the race to a draw.

Two words: Dee Bates

user-pic

Steve, you have outdone yourself!!!!

"Truth or Consequences"

You've laid it all out so well, including the way you began your piece. This is just outstanding. And I have sent an email to Josh begging him to promote this on the front page. It's that important!

Yes. This is all about whether our leaders deserve the mantle of leadership and are mentally and morally fit, or whether they are "rolled out" to the public, like a "product" for "consumption" and "anointed" as the next savior for the masses.

Thank you, Steve. I recall we took an internet test. And both came out as idealistic to the core (anti-authoritarians, I believe it was). I salute you, buddy! And I pray we can keep our Constitution as it deserves to be kept. I pray we elect leaders who understand that their oath is to the Constitution. And who know what an oath really means. And who understand the Constitution they have sworn to preserve, protect, and defend.

From winter on I have understood that this election was really about the Constitution and the Rule of Law. And so do you. But now we know huge the stakes are.

I cannot thank you enough for this piece and the care with which you have written it.

Peace.

user-pic

"McCain's decision to ink his deal with the devil"

In case you missed my post from yesterday (just fell off the rec list) on mcShame's
Faustian Bargain:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/lady-macdeath-a-faustian-barga.php

It’s September, 1787. The founding fathers are arguing over what form of government the new nation will have. Among the big issues being debated is whether to give the right to vote to all citizens or only to those who are educated and of standing. Such a notion is not simply elitism. It stems from a genuine concern for the healthy stewardship of the country.

Some of the founding fathers believe that the masses are either too ignorant, too apathetic, or don’t possess the inclination for critical thinking necessary to choose the best leaders. Ben Franklin argues strongly that all must have the right to vote if the government is to have legitimacy. Franklin wins his argument. However, on leaving the Convention he is asked by a bystander what, form of government have we, a republic or a monarchy. To which Franklin replies, "A republic, if you can keep it".

Fast-forward 221 years. It’s now September, 2008. I used to believe in the hypothesis that a greater net intelligence emerges from the many individual lesser ones when we have national election. I have come to doubt that hypothesis. I've come to wonder whether Americans have become so profoundly ignorant and lazy that it has become impossible for a greater net intelligence to emerge from our elections. Have we reached those cross-roads Franklin warned us of 221 years ago?

Does the sort of dumbing down dynamic we have seen over the last several election cycles signal something very deeply disturbing about the character of our nation? This subject has, of course, been written about in books such as, ‘What’s the matter with Kansas’. My thoughts are that this is indeed a deeply disturbing reflection of our citizenry.

Our politicians are a reflection of us. We say we don’t like negative politics yet we do respond to it. Politicians understand that, which is why they continue with it. Was it Jefferson who said that, a democracy gets the leaders it deserves? Or, paraphrasing Jefferson, if our government sucks it’s because we suck.

This year, I feel that we are witnessing a truly frightening experiment by the Republicans. They are freely and openly showing their cynicism and contempt for voters. How else do we explain their blatant shameless and repeated lying over the ‘bridge to nowhere’ It no longer matters that the press directly calls them out on their lying, they apparently have great faith in the overriding ignorance and weak thinking skills of voters. I wonder, however, if the truth is actually worse than that. I wonder if such voter ignorance is willful.

I suspect that the majority of voters can find the facts, and can recognize a lie when they’re told one, it’s just that they don't want to. Lies are often sweet while the truth often bland. This Republican experiment in cynicism and voter contempt is the polar opposite to the experiment Obama is running.

Obama is betting that enough of us do care, that we will find the facts and make the right choices for the future of the nation. Those who get angry with Obama for not fighting like the Republicans forget that essential aspect of his candidacy. Obama himself calls it his bet on the American people, but it is also an experiment which may determine the outlook for our republic. Will we have a republic, or a monarchy(of a sort)?

If the GOP’s experiment succeeds, and McCain /Palin elected, Franklin’s 200 year old warning will have come about. If so, can the dramatic waning, if not outright fall, of our democracy be far behind?

Note: The above comment is repeatedhere from an earlier post of mine titled, 'If We Can Keep It', as it seems particular relevant to this thread topic. Orginally, it was very quickly bumped from the list by the clogged TPM server.

Since we have yet to have turnout that accurately reflects the majority of America, I don't think these sorts of analysis are entirely correct and are based on incomplete numbers.

user-pic

"Republicans...freely and openly showing their cynicism and contempt for voters"

Thank you for that! I like your line of reasoning and applaud you for reposting this.

user-pic

I am reading the last pages of Upton Sinclair's "Oil!", which does a similar job to "The Jungle", of exposing the machinery of business and politics. He re-writes the Teapot Dome scandal, and the profiteering of WW I, but what really sounded creepy was the mention of Republican and business leaders encouraging students to report subversive teachers, and the collecting of personal data on any political or labor activist.

It sounds so contemporary, the public adoration of wealth, the caution of the large newspapers to publish anything derogatory about business and political leaders, even if true, and the suppression of dissent. There was a war for the benefit of the propertied class, extending WW I by attempting to overthrow the Bolshevick government in Russia. We, and other nations had soldiers in Siberia and other areas, encouraging atrocities by the "white" Russians against the Soviets.

Also creepily resonant is the excess on Wall Street, with unexamined, much less regulated, financial innovation becoming unstable. Today we see another expected failure, bankruptcy for Lehman Bros, Merril Lynch being sold, and the market diving further. Why does no one mention that the NYSE has made zero net progress since Bush took office?

I expect worse before it gets better, if it does.

user-pic

Recommended. I think there is a chance--impossible to quantify--that if elected McCain will go back to being a maverick on behalf of some of his better causes, that he will betray the max of 10% of the electorate (see Jonathan Chait's excellent The Big Con, pages 100-103 for backup on this) that actually supports the radical Republican agenda of tax cuts for the already wealthy and corporations over all other priorities, his campaign promises to flip-flop and now embrace the Bush tax cuts, and most all his other campaign commitments.

Even Obama, for those listening closely, said that McCain has in recent years voted with Bush 90% of the time and asked if we really wanted to take a 10% chance on change?

The point, though, is that it is unclear whether anybody, most importantly and very possibly John McCain himself, knows John McCain's "real" mind and intentions.

Based on what we have seen, the 90%+ plus of voters who think the Republican economic agenda is lunacy, and the 7 in 10 who think we are on the wrong track as a country, would have to be stark-raving nuts to make such a bet. Because McCain is neither psychologically, emotionally, morally, and probably physically well enough, nor temperamentally suited, to be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office.

Apart from all this, even McCain as a newly vertebrate, consistent and somehow effective (how?) maverick just doesn't cut it. That agenda would amount to nibbling away at the edges of the Republican agenda. And that would amount to fiddling while Rome burns.

About his unfitness for the White House, the wrong-headedness of the agenda he has publicly committed to, and about the fraud and lies which form the foundation of his entire campaign, there can be no equivocation from any of us who see and share a sense of the dangers you, TCFKANCS, eloquently set forth.

I recently finished Robert Kuttner's 2007 The Squandering of America (not to worry, reading it at bedtime so no tradeoff with the campaign work I'm doing).

It is very well written. Its subject matter--timely today as on increasingly many other days--is the world of Wall Street and international finance, and how through its capture of the US political process its priorities have become utterly dominant today. This, Kuttner argues, not only has the effect of redistributing income and wealth steadily upward and gradually hollowing out the US middle and working classes, but of destabilizing the US and global economies and adding immensely to the risk of widespread economic collapse.

Basically, Wall Street's policy agenda has prevailed, enabling the Street to "go nuts", as Kuttner the (clean-writing) uber-wonk nicely put it in a recent appearance on Hannity and Colmes promoting his just-released book Obama's Promise, in which Hannity rudely interrupted him and never did let him identify even a single policy Kuttner advocates. Wall Street desperately needs to be re-tamed and re-regulated or else it may be only a matter of time until we start reliving the 1930s.

The Squandering of America is not the easiest read but is a very good read, well worth the effort, plenty accessible to this crowd, and chock full of facts and arguments which are quite usable and distillable for advocacy purposes.

I am in the middle of that book as well. Fabulous, common sense analysis of our economic reality in this country. This book should be required reading for anyone running for public office in America.

user-pic

That will be soon on my reading list.

I dunno. I tend to agree, but there's also the role we the people are playing in our own enslavement to the depravity of the consumer culture.

How quickly, and how broadly, Americans come to see that we are complicit in our own downfall will have a lot to do with whether the fall can be converted merely to a stumble.

I'm hopeful, but it'll be a near thing. To me, the Obama campaign is based on the hope that we're smarter than we've shown evidence of being with the kind of television shows we support.

Fantastic post, Steve! You've nicely summed up what I've been thinking for a long time, but have been unable to put into words.

One suggestion: you should consider paring it down a bit and submitting it as a letter to the editor to some of your local (or not so local) papers. I think you've hit on some serious points that need to be shared!

Thanks for the post Steve. It's good to see it all laid out because I was beginning to think I was losing my mind.

Because we don't get HBO, my husband and I only recently saw the movie "Recount". The scene where the Republicans stormed the office where the counting was taking place, pounding on the doors and screaming to be let in, was truly terrifying. I couldn't believe this was happening in my country. I love my country. I want it back.

user-pic

Minds lost. Posts lost. Grr!

user-pic

"Republicans...freely and openly showing their cynicism and contempt for voters"

Thank you for that! I like your line of reasoning and applaud you for reposting this,

user-pic

this should posted up above... so I redid that.

Tpm software.... more like "derange-ware!"

Thank you, TheraP. In my original post of that above comment I almost added the observation that current events feel disconcertingly like some proverbial 'good vs. evil' conflict.

I thought maybe no one else would relate to such a feeling so decided against including it then. So, I find it intriguing, and no less disconcerting, that Steve mentions also having such a "good vs. evil" feeling about this election.

Frankly, I'm starting to feel like I'm an extra in a Robert Capra movie.

user-pic

And Steve's comment about his insight and feeling like it was a "prophetic vision." I've had that same sense recently. Like, please, I'm a normal everyday citizen, why is Charlie Gibson not interviewing me? I have a message for America too!!! And mine is all about a stark good vs evil prophetic call to please return to The Constitution and The Rule of Law!

Yes... it's quite something when you feel like it needs to be shouted from the housetops. (not that anyone would hear me from my housetop)

Thank God for these intertubes! These fishing nets that perhaps signify that Jesus would have come seeking bloggers this time!!!

user-pic

It needs both proofreading and spellcheck -- which hopefully would result in a rewrite that would make it clear, a pleasure to read, and shorter.

Otherwise, as to sentiment: I've realized those facts and trends -- the "Where these realities lead" -- since 12/12/2000. That's why, though a Hillary supporter my fallback has all along been: "Any Democrat".

I have come to the same conclusion myself. I think we have to have a revolution from the people. This cannot be 'about' Obama and McCain. We have to push back on the media and demand better from them. We are their consumers. We have to reach out in awkward discomfort to our neighbors and relatives far away who do not get the same information we do. Many live in the world where CNN and FOX on TV are their only source of information. We have to question the polling companies. We need ask questions about how many registered voters are in each state for each party and hold the pollsters accountable for their influence on the public and how they conduct themselves. We need to call and write the organizations that fight voter suppression and fraud and demand that they get out in the media talking about what if anything we can do to make this election fair and real. Not just because we want to know but we need to put the repuplicans on notice that we are willing to fight back in volume! Asking everyone to verify their registration, voter early if they can, register at least on other person, and volunteer to help on election day.
We truly are on the brink of losing what is left of our democracy if we don't fight for it. Yet, I know we can and we can win!!

TV NEWS IS LOST:

News show producers have discovered (as have TV entertainment show producers) that reality programs are the most profitable form of TV show. What is the key to every successful reality show? It's conflict. Conflict creates drama, which creates entertainment, which creates viewers, which creates profits. Conflict = Profits.

TV news today is driven to maximize their contribution to the corporate bottom line by a degree they never were expected to prior to Reagan's so-called free market deregulation policies. This is the root of the media problem.

The natural pressure to contribute profits to large corporate parents, who themselves have shareholders breathing down their necks, is the force behind the problem. That's why the news has become so useless. They are more interested in creating and sustain conflict than in public service. They are predominantly profit driven.

Excellent post, NC Steve. No matter who wins this election, those of us who believe in the US Constitution and the need for a functioning free press have our work cut out for us for the next 20 years. The root of the problem is described very well by Kevin Drum at Mother Jones. See "The Backfire Effect" at:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/

As for this particular election, I'm not yet ready to buy the doom-and-gloom scenario. As Yogi Berra said, "It ain't over till it's over." We just can't know until election day whether it's the side registering new voters or the side working to suppress those votes that will win.

"The Fate of the Republic is at Stake"

I'm not sure if you know that this is one of the oldest election memes going back to the foundation of this country.

It gets dusted off pretty much every four years or so.

It gets called "the most important election in a generation", "the most critical election of the last 50 years", "the stakes couldn't be higher", etc, etc, etc.

This time is no different.

The reason this meme exists is because it mobilizes the base. Without fail.

Let's hope so, Lalo. Like you, many of us have seen quite a few elections before, but this one feels different somehow.

I know, I used to say the same thing to myself every four years for longer than I care to admit.

I tolorably familiar with U.S. electoral history. I specifically noted that I was making a statement that would result in eye-rolling if I heard it from anybody else.

Thing is, though they may say it every other election, every seventy or eighty years, its true. It was true in 1860 and 1864. It was true in 1932. It might well have been true in 1936 if Huey Long hadn't been assassinated. I happen to think its true in 2008.

I am tolorably familiar . . .

Though I guess I could have claimed I was following Billy Glad's injunction to omit articles to ease the server load.

I'm saying it's probably a good thing because it rallies supporters to the party's side.

Omitting articles?

That too!

:-)

no,no,no! No omitting of articles. Not now or ever. We need articles. ;)

user-pic

TC:

I have enjoyed most of your posts and I relate to this post in a big way. I have thought a lot about the cascading affect of a weakened free press basically reached the same conclusion back in 2006. But I disagree that while we are near the precipice, what are not yet there.

I followed closely the events of Watergate, even though I was only 17-20 years old. I respected the journalistic / investigatory efforts such that I considered becoming a journalism major, until I found out that everyone else was doing the same thing. Although I well understand the power of corporate money, I constantly wonder how it happened that virtually a whole profession has been subverted. If the Dems had not taken control of at least one house in 2006 I was going to fear the worst. This time around, if Congress sees Dem gains, we still have a chance.

After a trip to Bavaria/East Europe last year, I took to reading 1930's German history. The similarities between our world and Germany's in the 20-30's are striking. Some of the Repubs and Hitler/Himmler have some things in common when it comes to public relations.

Nonetheless, I continue to work on my survival cave and plans. We have water and many good defensible positions here in WV.


After reading through these posts, I think most of you people might be a little bit insane :)

Our civil liberties and privacy are eroded more each and every day, and the political party in power has nothing to do with that. It's unfortunate, but open your eyes. Republicans and Democrats both do this. It has nothing to do with McCain or Palin vs. Barrack "sent from God" Obama.

user-pic

Randy: Fom which party is the impetus to do this coming? Equally from both? You must be joking.

NC Steve...great post. I, too, have like this is an election that is more important than any I can remember, and I've been around awhile...My kids think I'm a little nuts w/ my "end of the world as we know it" speeches, but I believe it w/ all my heart. If there was not one other issue, this is a battle between good and evil...hard for me to believe the Evangelicals are on the side of evil, but there you have it.

Thanks for the great post.

I recently posted (to zero fanfare) that America will have the president it deserves. If America chooses ignorance, lies, dirty tactics and special interests after having suffered through it for 7/8 years, then America can have more of it.

Somewhere in this world a hungrier, more focused and vibrant nation is ready to take the mantle. But I doubt (whichever nation that is) that a finer or more noble chance for an enduring and improving democracy will ever again be seen on this earth.

So come on, "Yes we can".

And we must.

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address