« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Take 2: What you need to know about Palin: Wasilla, AK, woman’s email confirmed by 2006 document
I got an email from my very conservative (and bitter) cousin today. He wrote, “In the interest of fairness and openness I forward the following. But this election is a fraud. This country is a corporate dictatorship. Both candidates are lying to the extent that they are helping to facilitate the deception.” What he forwarded was an email about Sarah Palin written by a woman who lives in Wasilla, AK, named Anne Kilkenny.
A post here I read earlier today by aboyer made reference to an item on Palin, and one of the comments, by kgb999, found the source at http://thepoliticalcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2008/09/alaskans-speak-in-frightened-whisper.html. This man, Charley James, noted that the information he was reprinting was confirmed by The Nation (at http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/354444/the_word_from_wasilla). The Nation had reprinted the same email my cousin had sent me.
I don’t like to accept something as fact, just because it fits with what I believe—or would like to believe—is true. So I went to Mudflats, a lovely little Website by an unnamed Alaskan, which he subtitles “Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics” [http://mudflats.wordpress.com/]. I found this (like many other people) after Palin’s nomination was announced.
It was through Mudflats that I found the document it’s amazing the McCain campaign didn’t find: It’s a 63-page 2006 PDF compiled by the Alaskan Democratic Party from government documents and newspaper sources. It confirms everything Anne Kilkenny asserted about Palin, but it does it in, what is to me, a much more sobering fashion.
There’s barely any commentary in the PDF, which doesn’t even have a title page but just comes up with the title tab “palin-2006-vetting.”
This is something than anyone who does not want McCain and Palin elected needs to read and distribute. Go to Mudflats at http://mudflats.wordpress.com/ and scroll down to “Palin Vetting Documents from 2006. For Hard Core Palin Addicts Only.”
Everything you’ve never wanted to know but now need to know about Palin is in the PDF. I was left feeling queasy—and also worried that Palin could stand toe to toe with Cheney in a ruthlessness contest. I’m not sure she wouldn’t win.








Comments (8)
Superb! Somebody notify the mainstream press!
September 6, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This must be the same document which Politico.com reported on last Tuesday.
September 6, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it is. But the Politico didn't make much of some pretty damning, shall I say, flip-flops by Palin. And it didn't go into her ruthlessness, nor her willingness to play the gender card‚ when it suits her.
It's really worth reading. I tell ya, Barracuda isn't a pet name.
September 6, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
"And it didn't go into her ruthlessness,"
** Most Americans will respond moderately favorably to ruthlesness.
"nor her willingness to play the gender card‚"
** This a nothing.
** Obama needs to regain the upper hand.
Chasing down ways to "out" this incompetent political hack isn't the way to the White House.
September 7, 2008 3:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't forget about Editor & Publisher which is widely read throughout the media.
September 7, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rec. Thanks, Facilitatrix! No, it's not a pet name. What's sad is that she facilitates [ ;)] the perpetuation of that anti-feminine stereotype by the way she behaves. It's as if the stereotype existed and she decided to mold herself to it; indeed, to appropriate it more fully and personify it. An all consuming female. Everyman's fear, only she consumes all irrespective of gender and place in life. Just because some asshole men behave in the same way is no permission (in my book) for women to behave in a similar way. And that seems to be the raging argument - 'well, if a man did it, no one would even blink.' My point is they [the ubiquitous NO-ONE] fucking SHOULD blink!!! Jeez!
September 6, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I skimmed it the other day. And was surprised there was no listing for "Hypocrisy."
Good to see you! Hope all is well.
September 7, 2008 4:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, the level of hypocrisy is beyond anything imaginable here. Karl Rove never pretended to be a saint. I'll give him that. But these two pretend sainthood while lying through their teeth!
September 7, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment