« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Stop Overreacting -- Letting Bill Clinton Support Obama in his Own Way
I wrote the following comment in response to a blog entry sarcastically suggesting that Bill Clinton is officially campaigning for McCain now. I don't think it's true, but I think there is a brader point Clinton himself has been making that we really need to come to grips with, and why we need to stop overreacting to some perceived sleight to Obama that seems to be coming from Bill Clinton:
If you look at his interview on The Daily Show a few nights ago (available on their website), it is crystal clear that Clinton wants Obama to win. I will grant you, there is this Clintonian way (maybe, more accurately, a Clinton-centric way) that he says it. But look at the end of the second part of that interview, and Jon Stewart's reaction to it -- there is no question whose side the Clintons are on in this election - Obama's. And they know, as well as most of us do deep down inside -- even if we can't believe it -- that Obama is going to win in a "not nearly as close as some have been thinking" election, because you don't get to preside over 7 years of financial problems capped by a near total financial collapse and taxpayer bailout, and also behave as McCain has done recently (especially since he launched his dishonest negative mid-summer television campaign, then the Palin selection, then the bailout drama queen stunt, and now the angry, bullying and ultimately small debate performance, which clearly evidences his temperament problem for 57+ Million viewers, including especially independents) and still win. The GOP is toast, from top to bottom. Clinton is no fool - the writing is on the wall, and the polls that are now swinging dramatically in Obama's direction don't even come close to reflecting the Democrats' enthusiasm, registration and ground game advantages, which are huge.
So let's stop overreacting and making things up, like this ridiculous notion that Clinton wants McCain to win. It feeds a false narrative that we need to stop. Clinton is trying to attract the unconverted -- the voters who don't already want to vote for Obama. Havng him be more overtly partisan in his attacks on McCain does little or nothing to accomplish that objective. As he pointed out on Meet the Press, he is seeking to appeal to people who are not as antagonistic towards McCain as we are, but who like a lot of what Obama has to say, but don't fully trust him (or understand that McCain is, from a policy perspective, a continuation of the same bad government, favor the rich, approach they are hurting from now).
Don't mistake his Clintonian way of expressing himself on the mainstream media -- which is aimed at those voter -- with the true substance of what he is saying unreservedly, which is that the Republicans MUST be defeated in 2008, from top to bottom. Whether he likes or loves Obama is quite beside the point -- to Clinton, he is more than good enough and if Bill wants to credit Hillary for that (which is not entirely unfair -- her campaign sharpened Obama's skills considerably), so be it. As Obama says, it is amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care about who gets the credit. So instead of accusing Clinton for seeming not to want to go far enough to support Obama, let's credit both Hillary and Bill for their extraordinary contributions to the campaign, and for doing anything they do to help. Keep the focus on winning, not who gets the credit.








Comments (5)
Clinton is too smart and sophisticated for the TPM simplistic raucous crowd to understand.
September 28, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
With support like Bill's Obama doesn't need any enemies.
September 28, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's be clear about a few points.
1. separate Hilary and Bill - you said "Clintons" when post was about Bill (and in response to other posts/comments in another thread - most of which did not conflate the two).
2. Posters, while maybe going overboard, have a legitimate point. He was hesitant and slow in answering questions on Obama - do you respect him type questions. That does not look good. You may think all undecided Hilary and former Bill voters understand the "subtlety" inherent there, but I really think that is not the case.
3. His takes on Palin are fine, but often without the "But..." that is needed.
I think Bill's heart is not in this. He can say "I respect John McCain and his service and what he went through as a POW. But we are electing a President and John is on the wrong side of too many issues." "Palin is tough and admirable, but she is on the wrong side of too many issues that concern the future of our country."
Call me simplistic and raucous, but it does seem his heart isn't in it. I won't go as far as others who say he is purposefully trying to see him lose.
September 28, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does his heart need to be in it? Is it not enough that he works to help in those areas where his help would do the most good? We are not trying to persuade the already converted, we are trying to persuade those who actually like and admire Sarah Palin despite what we see as her obvious deficiencies, who see Mccain's bluster as directness and a form of strength, and who see Obama's brilliant thought processes as indecisiveness.
We know what happens when a person who holds dogmatic and flawed views doesn't "blink""or treats every event as a crisis to be manipulated for political advantage, but many of the people who have not yet taken the leap to support Obama, because he is the lesser known figure, don't necessarily care about (or fully appreciate) the nuances that make us feel so strongly that McCain would be a terrible President (and Palin even worse). If Bill Clinton, by treating McCain and Palin with a level of respect that makes some of us question his motives, is able as a result to form a bridge to the people who have not yet turned on to Obama despite the last 8 months of exposure to his gifts (and yet who may still vote for the Democrats because of exhaustion with GOP policies) do not need to feel as if they are under attack because of their willingness to consider voting for McCain or for liking Palin.
So who better than Clinton, who has plenty of reasons of his own for not loving Obama in the same way that the converted do, to be there to reach out to those who share similar ambivalence. Clinton's political magic has always been winning over people by feeling their pain. What better example of that than his ambivalence to Obama. So to me, the key metric to watch is how much campaigning Bill does for Obama over the next 6 weeks, and where, and not his approach to how to make the case.
Do watch the Daily Show interview. I am convinced after watching it that Clinton is sincere in his support of Obama. Of course, that may well be a matter of what the meaning of the word "is" is.
September 28, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think MMW puts it just the right way...
We all honor Bill's service to this country...
Did I say that right.
September 28, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment