Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Sarah Palin: 1, Josh Marshall: 0

Let's take another look at what happened since last Friday and ask ourselves a question:

What did TPM and DailyKos do to help Obama and advance the cause of his campaign?

The answer is simple: NOTHING

No, strike that.

TPM, DailyKos and other media channels, formerly known as "progressive", spent all this time helping John McCain, by "vetting" of Sarah Palin.

The speed, brutality, partisanship and bitterness of this "vetting" was breathtaking.

But that wouldn't be so bad, if Josh and his "progressive" friends didn't actively stoke the press and TV to pick up on these stories.

Mike Huckabee said a lot of stupid things in his convention speech. But he was dead on when he said that the Republicans owe the news media a debt of gratitude for uniting their party behind their candidates.

And the American voters will owe Josh Marshall a debt of gratitude for sending Sarah Palin on the path of becoming America's newest Erin Brockovich.

What a disservice to Obama and his message. With friends like this...


Comments (92)

lalo35, you should stop blaming Josh for what us bloggers post...

I smell concern-troll musk.

PS...you and Billy should form a mutual castigation society.

At least Billy is willing to show his face, even if he is hiding under a straw hat.

Your avatar immediately destroys any credibility you might think you own here.

I don't blame Josh. I blame the "progressives".

When Obama was desperately trying to ignore Palin and focus on economy etc, they would have none of it. They played right into McCain's hands.

This site is rapidly becoming a mal-functioning tabloid trash. Now wonder it's owned by TPM MEDIA.

Lalo, Josh ignored the mother-daughter-baby rumors until they were used by the McCain campaign as an excuse for releasing news of Bristol's pregnancy.

I admire Josh for having no part in the slime, but diligently exposing Trooper-gate and other facts about Palin the McCain campaign is none too eager to make public.

If you want to blame someone, blame bloggers here like John Nail and a few others, who kept the slime flyng in spite of warnings by yours truly and others.

Lalo, you're okay, I really think so. But it's sort of, well, really deluded to think the mainstream media is aware of what Nail whoever he is or any of the others were saying about aliens landing on earth and impregnating Bristol AND Sarah Palin with devil seed. I actually didn't read his posts, just passed over the titles, so if I have this wrong that he was an offending party in the assault on Palin's purity, I'm sorry I assumed.

But, whoever was doing the offending, I don't much think it matters in regard to the big picture. Hate to have to be the one to tell you, but we're all of us frigging nobodies and if Josh Marshall and Greg Sargent and the rest aren't flogging wacko stories about Palin, I highly doubt that anybody's wading through our posts and comments to see what the little people are saying.

What faithful? I may support Obama, but I am an unaffiliated with little to no faith in party politics. I will, without any hesitation, ruin a candidate on either side of the aisle if I feel they have gone too far.

Don't blame Bloggers, regardless of whom they support, for doing what they do so well. It is a reality that all campaigns have to deal with for now and evermore.

And PLEASE! Don't try and tell me this information would have come out in time if we let the media do the job. Nobody would have ever known if we weren't kicking in the doors to get at the information.

Lalo is for Obama, but he dislikes Josh.

Lalo, I think you missed the part where Josh kept it on legitimate issues and unanswered questions. As it turns out, Palin does have a rather sketchy record, and there is more to come. Sorry the media vetting is happening so fast, but that's what happens when you thrust a relative unknown into the spotlight at the last minute. I'm glad the pres is doing their job to inform us of who she is beyond the McCain talking points.

When Obama spoke to reporters following the initial "hair trigger" press release, he made it very clear what his strategy was for dealing with Palin: be polite and ignore her.

It was clear and obvious for all to see.

Well, the "progressive" blogs ignored his advice. They turned Palin into an instant and controversial celebrity. They an interest in her while pushing the expectations below the basement.

On top of this, they help the Republicans orchestrate the "backlash".

On top of that, they had some good bullets but they fired them all at once and now the legitimate issues can be brushed aside as "desperate liberals'" talking points.

Why is it necessary for the strategy of bloggers and the Obama campaign (and Obama himself) to be the same? Can't they complement one another?

Palin was going to be the darling of the extreme right no matter what Josh or anyone else online happened to say. And you seem to be forgetting that McCain and the Republicans don't need anything real to manufacture a sympathy-inducing reaction in their base against the bad, bad liberals anyway.

Raising questions about Palin's rather limited and odd background is entirely legitimate. Since McCain didn't vet her, somebody else has to.

The thing that really amazes me is that a lot of the ammo for all the stories about Palin is coming from a few Alaska reporters, and I'm pretty sure they're Republicans! So much for McCain's claims about "liberal bloggers," but do you really believe that if not one story about Palin was written by any blogger in the last 6 days, that McCain would be saying anything different anyway? Haven't you seen these guys operate for nearly 8 years now?

Why is it necessary for the strategy of bloggers and the Obama campaign (and Obama himself) to be the same? Can't they complement one another?

Palin was going to be the darling of the extreme right no matter what Josh or anyone else online happened to say. And you seem to be forgetting that McCain and the Republicans don't need anything real to manufacture a sympathy-inducing reaction in their base against the bad, bad liberals anyway.

The thing that really amazes me is that a lot of the ammo for all the stories about Palin is coming from a few Alaska reporters, and I'm pretty sure most of them are Republicans! So much for McCain's claims about "liberal bloggers," eh? But do you really believe that if not one story about Palin was written by any blogger in the last 6 days, that McCain would be saying anything different anyway?
Haven't you seen these guys operate for nearly 8 years now? Actually, it's gone on far longer than 8 years; the Republicans have been using the bogeyman of the liberal press almost as long as I can remember - at least as far back as Nixon.

Raising questions about Palin's limited and odd background is entirely legitimate. Since McCain didn't vet her, somebody has to.

TPM isn't an adjunct of the Obama campaign, and they've never professed to be. They practice activist journalism here, and it would be shameful if TPM ceased covering real stories liker Troopergate just because Obama willed it (which he didn't do). None of the TPM staff wrote one word about the baby-baby situation until McCain puyt out his presser.

You need to check your timeline.

If you don't like robust free speech, go to North Korea, America-hating troll.

Jesus, why do the rightwing whine so much when people dare to speak freely?

I say: Pound the GOP more than ever. We need to be determined to win. Donate. Campaign. And NEVER EVER EVER shut up!!

If you don't like robust free speech, go to North Korea, America-hating troll.

Jesus, why do the rightwing whine so much when people dare to speak freely?

I say: Pound the GOP more than ever. We need to be determined to win. Donate. Campaign. And NEVER EVER EVER shut up!!

If you don't like robust free speech, go to North Korea, America-hating troll.

Jesus, why do the rightwing whine so much when people dare to speak freely?

I say: Pound the GOP more than ever. We need to be determined to win. Donate. Campaign. And NEVER EVER EVER shut up!!

"America's newest Erin Brockovich"

Why because she wants to drill, drill, drill?

CFMA!!

What is it with people bashing Josh? I very much doubt that Josh (or Markos at DailyKos) is so all-powerful that what he writes on the front page of TPM, is going to determine the outcome of this election. Josh has a view and I value it. He has a blog and he expresses it. So?

I may not agree with you on a lot of things, Lalo35adm, but you have also expressed some very thoughtful posts in the past. I just cannot go there with you this time. Josh is no slinker. He calls it as he sees it. Don't we all?

What a naive view of Josh Marshall. You obviously haven't read his theorizing about activist journalism, which he has happily shared in the past with MSM business reporters, and in seminars he gets invited to since he won a big journalism award for using new journalism to a political end.

Heh. You have a link?

What political ends is Josh using his journalism towards? You never said. You make him sound nefarious and shadowy. His stuff is out there on TPM front page. Also, I doubt most of us read only one blog. Josh speaks as he sees and we (his readers) are not mindless minions.

I used to wonder how Josh Marshall could be so bad at what he does. Then I realized his success is based on the failure of Democrats, i.e., Gore and Kerry, and the corruption of the Bush administration. What Josh needs is more failure and more corruption. His incompetence is his greatest strength. It almost makes you believe in intelligent design.

Oh you're just pissed he blew off your nasty emails to him about his reporters.

Christopher Hitchens made similar comments about Mother Theresa, how she needed that poverty and filthiness on display to further her career and make sure the money kept coming in to build more displays of poverty. With all that money, what did she do to get people *OUT* of poverty? Oh, highly against abortion and birth control for the people who needed it most. Any positive suggestions for their plight? Just send money.

Lovely Ad hominen attacks from the paragon of self righteousness himself.

Please. So ridiculous.

First of all baby gate and the other issues which had nothing to do with her disastrous policy positions. Did not originate in the blogs. Was the baby hers or not was floating around the Alaska the press first, then picked up by the blogs. Did they run a little heavy on it yes. However, everybody has dropped that line of attack and agrees it's unproductive.

And as far as the press vetting, McCain or his campaign didn't do it so who else is left.

And most of what I have seen other than Andrew Sullivan going of the deep end has been around what she did or did not do as a mayor or is doing as a governor and her ethics issues around trooper incident. In my mind fair game.

Don't accept the role unless you are willing to answer how you took a town with a budget surplus and left it with 20+ million in debt. Defend your positions on pro-life, (my God even Cindy McCain and Laura Bush don't agree totally with her here) creationism, the Iraq war is a mission from God, trying to ban books, for earmarks, for the bridge to nowhere and the list goes on and on. And please will someone explain how Gov. Palin is a tax cutter in state that has no income tax and added a very regressive tax while being mayor.

Rec, Lalo. ;-)

But you're being too easy on Josh. I'd put him somewhere in the negative numbers.

lalo...just another waste of cyber ink here. you are so biased and full of yourself. TPM is a place where we can think out loud and unload our feelings. You sir are no blogger but a troll of highly mis-informed blah..blahs...

There will be more vetting of Palin. The more rocks that are turned over, the weaker McCain's selection for VP will become. The McCain fix is on in Alaska with silence being bought for future favors. I do not assume that a political machine that whupped the Clinton machine's ass is sitting on its hands. I don't always agree with Josh, but I have watched him create TPM over the years. He, initially, was more politically neutral, but I do think he tries to look at both sides before he writes. I haven't figured out who follows who, but it seems that the blogs stir the ashes and a couple of days later, the talking heads and editorial writers pick up what's selling. Then the "real" blogging and commenting begins. Written in a thousand different forms, but the same opinionated bs.

Yes of course there will be more vetting. But the impact of any future vetting has been blunted because an opportunity has been squandered by the "progressives".

As far as the political machine that won the Caucus War, it turns out that TPM has nothing to do with the Obama campaign.

The Obama campaign wanted to ignore Palin. TPM and DailyKos instead ignored Obama.

Obama clearly wanted to speak about issues and not about personal stuff. They didn't want to "ignore Palin" as that would be a stupid tactic. Barack has been everything but stupid, though he has made some mistakes.

There will be more vetting of Palin. The more rocks that are turned over, the weaker McCain's selection for VP will become. The McCain fix is on in Alaska with silence being bought for future favors. I do not assume that a political machine that whupped the Clinton machine's ass is sitting on its hands. I don't always agree with Josh, but I have watched him create TPM over the years. He, initially, was more politically neutral, but I do think he tries to look at both sides before he writes. I haven't figured out who follows who, but it seems that the blogs stir the ashes and a couple of days later, the talking heads and editorial writers pick up what's selling. Then the "real" blogging and commenting begins. Written in a thousand different forms, but the same opinionated bs.

There will be more vetting of Palin. The more rocks that are turned over, the weaker McCain's selection for VP will become. The McCain fix is on in Alaska with silence being bought for future favors. I do not assume that a political machine that whupped the Clinton machine's ass is sitting on its hands. I don't always agree with Josh, but I have watched him create TPM over the years. He, initially, was more politically neutral, but I do think he tries to look at both sides before he writes. I haven't figured out who follows who, but it seems that the blogs stir the ashes and a couple of days later, the talking heads and editorial writers pick up what's selling. Then the "real" blogging and commenting begins. Written in a thousand different forms, but the same, opinionated, bs.

There will be more vetting of Palin. The more rocks that are turned over, the weaker McCain's selection for VP will become. The McCain fix is on in Alaska with silence being bought for future favors. I do not assume that a political machine that whupped the Clinton machine's ass is sitting on its hands. I don't always agree with Josh, but I have watched him create TPM over the years. He, initially, was more politically neutral, but I do think he tries to look at both sides before he writes. I haven't figured out who follows who, but it seems that the blogs stir the ashes and a couple of days later, the talking heads and editorial writers pick up what's selling. Then the "real" blogging and commenting begins. Written in a thousand different forms, but the same, opinionated, bs.

There will be more vetting of Palin. The more rocks that are turned over, the weaker McCain's selection for VP will become. The McCain fix is on in Alaska with silence being bought for future favors. I do not assume that a political machine that whupped the Clinton machine's ass is sitting on its hands. I don't always agree with Josh, but I have watched him create TPM over the years. He, initially, was more politically neutral, but I do think he tries to look at both sides before he writes. I haven't figured out who follows who, but it seems that the blogs stir the ashes and a couple of days later, the talking heads and editorial writers pick up what's selling. Then the "real" blogging and commenting begins. Written in a thousand different forms, but the same, opinionated, screaming out for attention.

What insight!

If the blogs had just been nice Palin wouldn't have lied through her fucking teeth last night.

It works. Thanks for the thought.

I don't think you understood the thought at all.

But thanks for stopping by.

You argue that if the blogs had been sufficiently reverent to St.Sarah of Childbirth she would not have acted, and spoke as, the lying pit bull in lipstick last night.

The two facts are unconnected. Certainly, you aren't so stupid as to believe otherwise.

You argue that if the blogs had been sufficiently reverent to St.Sarah of Childbirth she would not have acted, and spoke as, the lying pit bull in lipstick last night. That damn truth thing, it's so out of style.

Certainly, you aren't so stupid as to believe Sarah would have told the truth if the truth had not been told about her.

Not at all.

I'm arguing that if the blogs followed the Obama campaign strategy and unloaded their bullets one by one after her speech, it would have been FAR more effective.

Except, of course, I doubt anyone at the Obama campaign is sharing with the crew around here.

I am the last to defend Josh, but this perhaps gives him a little too much credit. Have you worked at any Internet company? As can be seen from what happened this past week, they aren't all that organized sometime.

Perhaps try the decaf?

Sarah Palin played the nasty card fully and completely last night. She used her unwed teenage daughter and own baby as props- even flying in the daddy and doing photo ops of them.

Whining about mean posters on Kos was a very valid strategy until she presented herself as a pit bull. Now it just makes her defenders looks week.

Sarah Palin played the nasty card fully and completely last night. She used her unwed teenage daughter and own baby as props- even flying in the daddy and doing photo ops of them.

Whining about mean posters on Kos was a very valid strategy until she presented herself as a pit bull. Now it just makes her defenders looks week.

Hey, we have 2 months to go, and a lot can happen in the meantime. Obama and the Democrats are really geared up for this fight. I just came from a rally in REPUBLICAN Lancaster, PA where Obama spoke. Man, are the troops ever fired up!

What were you expecting, McCain to throw up his hands? That won't happen. Nor, I think, will he jettison St. Sarah a la Thomas Eagleton. He'll stick by her despite the obvious. She will be the ice beneath his wings.

The convention ends tonight, but I think it's a slow (electoral) death over the next 60 days for McCain. He might get a bounce, but it won't be as much as Obama's. The lack of detail in McCain's plans will come to the forefront during the debates. Plus, St. Sarah, the gift that keeps giving -- as she's vetted more and more, and as she gets ever deeper in Troopergate. That will erode the happy mom image that the GOP is putting forth pretty damn quick.

Be patient my fellow Progressives; have faith, and your good work will reap rewards.

Oh yeah - stop being so blooming childish and blaming Josh.

Give me a break. McCain and his new girlfriend are opportunistic liars. They're putting policies and "issues" on the back burner because their policies are those of the radical christian right wing. Not that McCain cares - he'll say anything at this point.

No. The politeness stops now. We always tell the truth but we go after this woman any we can.

The American people are renowned for believing any republican garbage thrown at them (George W elected twice for god's sake) so it's our mission to get the truth about her and about them out there.

Give me a break. McCain and his new girlfriend are opportunistic liars. They're putting policies and "issues" on the back burner because their policies are those of the radical christian right wing. Not that McCain cares - he'll say anything at this point.

No. The politeness stops now. We always tell the truth but we go after this woman any we can.

The American people are renowned for believing any republican garbage thrown at them (George W elected twice for god's sake) so it's our mission to get the truth about her and about them out there.

Give me a break. McCain and his new girlfriend are opportunistic liars. They're putting policies and "issues" on the back burner because their policies are those of the radical christian right wing. Not that McCain cares - he'll say anything at this point.

No. The politeness stops now. We always tell the truth but we go after this woman any we can.

The American people are renowned for believing any republican garbage thrown at them (George W elected twice for god's sake) so it's our mission to get the truth about her and about them out there.

Give me a break. McCain and his new girlfriend are opportunistic liars. They're putting policies and "issues" on the back burner because their policies are those of the radical christian right wing. Not that McCain cares - he'll say anything at this point.

No. The politeness stops now. We always tell the truth but we go after this woman any we can.

The American people are renowned for believing any republican garbage thrown at them (George W elected twice for god's sake) so it's our mission to get the truth about her and about them out there.

what the hell is wrong with the TPM server

Fuckin' progressives- lording all their power over the media.

Seriously dude, I understand your a rich, fat cat that doesn't want the working class to get ahead so we can be easily controlled by the likes of yourself.

However, I think you give us too much credit. I wish we had that much sway over the media and McLame's campaign.

Lame argument, lalo. Go trash progressives somewhere else. TPM is one of the few outlets we have. If you don't like it go vote for McLame-Pain and sign on to the Free Republic. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

Fuckin' progressives- lording all their power over the media.

Seriously dude, I understand your a rich, fat cat that doesn't want the working class to get ahead so we can be easily controlled by the likes of yourself.

However, I think you give us too much credit. I wish we had that much sway over the media and McLame's campaign.

Lame argument, lalo. Go trash progressives somewhere else. TPM is one of the few outlets we have. If you don't like it go vote for McLame-Pain and sign on to the Free Republic. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

Fuckin' progressives- lording all their power over the media.

Seriously dude, I understand your a rich, fat cat that doesn't want the working class to get ahead so we can be easily controlled by the likes of yourself.

However, I think you give us too much credit. I wish we had that much sway over the media and McLame's campaign.

Lame argument, lalo. Go trash progressives somewhere else. TPM is one of the few outlets we have. If you don't like it go vote for McLame-Pain and sign on to the Free Republic. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

Let's let bygones be bygones. Let's do a quick post mortem on this and move forward. No point in losing any sleep over this and even less good will be done if we waste any time beating ourselves up. After all, we are the good guys. And the good guys have a job to do.

From my perspective, like most people Sarah P has her pluses and minuses. But as a total package, she is one big bad onion. Let's peel back the layers and find where she rots. I know there's rot in there, I can smell it.

Let's let bygones be bygones. Let's do a quick post mortem on this and move forward. No point in losing any sleep over this and even less good will be done if we waste any time beating ourselves up. After all, we are the good guys. And the good guys have a job to do.

From my perspective, like most people Sarah P has her pluses and minuses. But as a total package, she is one big bad onion. Let's peel back the layers and find where she rots. I know there's rot in there, I can smell it.

Dude, the Trig-as-Bristols-baby stories were a plant - like the bug Rove planted in his own office and then called the FBI.

You WRITE reader blogs yourself. Isn't is really surprising that a first-time poster, no record at all, gets their very first post picked up by all the majors? With a story like THAT? And when have you ever known someone who makes troll-posts like that to immediately delete their account once the media uptake was complete?

If you are Rove and just got stuck with this turkey, how would you soften the effects of the media roll out? Plant a horrible story and then blame the disclosure on the press. It's a classic Rovian frame.

The reason Rove always kicks the deomcrat's asses is because they actually love to buy into the reality of the echo chamber he creates as much as the GOPers do.

If you invested even a fraction of the time you spend tearing down your fellow democrats doing something to bring about success, Obama would probably move a point in the polls.

I'm not talking about the mere mortal writers like us. I'm talking about the "award winning" writers who get to post on the front pate.

When you don't have the facts (resume) or the law (Trooper-Gate) on your side, attack the media.

That's what three years of full-time job experience in the past 16 years will get ya.

Erin Brockovich? I don't know Erin was against the environment!

what stupid post. im sure Viacom, General Electric, etc take their cues from Josh Marshall

go away concern troll

captain "obvious"?

indeed.

Speaking of Rovian plants...

Speaking of Rovian plants...

Speaking of Rovian plants...

Lalo misses the keep fact here:

The GOP largely made up scurrilous attacks on Palin to create a backlash against. It has been pointed out again and again. "Liberals" and "Democrats" were "smearing" her family, etc. etc. yet they can't point to any real articles in the press. On the contrary, it was McCain's camp which brought up the idea of a maternity test to be outraged about.

Lies.

Lalo misses the keep fact here:

The GOP largely made up scurrilous attacks on Palin to create a backlash against. It has been pointed out again and again. "Liberals" and "Democrats" were "smearing" her family, etc. etc. yet they can't point to any real articles in the press. On the contrary, it was McCain's camp which brought up the idea of a maternity test to be outraged about.

Lies.

Good grief.

The ones Palin has put one over on are the morons that take her seriously and elevate her to something she ain't.

I got blue pom poms for ya Lalo.

The GOP has a name for you folks: wankers.

I give up. There seem to be an increasing number of "Server Errors" and sometimes that means you need to start over, and sometimes it doesn't. After taking the prize the other day for the most duplicate posts in a row, I must be crazy for even trying. This time, the post I wrote to Lalo a half an hour ago really does seem not to have posted, but I don't have a copy. :(

Oh well, the gist was that the Republicans will always accuse the "liberal media" of all sorts of heinous crimes - it effectively riles up the base and they've been doing it at least since Nixon (when I started paying attention to such things). So it really doesn't matter what Josh or anyone else writes. The truly amusing thing is that this time, the ammo for many of the attacks on Palin has originated with a few Alaskan reporters, the majority of whom, I believe, are Republicans.

I'm copying this before I hit "Send>>" this time.

Oh jeez...the other one(s) show up now. I guess I have to stop posting here until the problems are resolved because this is really annoying/embarrassing.

Its so funny how the cultist followers of ObamaNATION are in a panic and running scared of Sarah Palin... I guess ObamaNATION has met his match... hehehehehe... GO PALIN!!!

Heh...I happen to think that Palin, despite her appeal to the extreme right wing of the Republican party, is a paper tiger. Why is she afraid to speak to the press? And if it's because she's not finished cramming for her Vice Presidental Midterms, well, all the cramming in the world can't get a person who is that unprepared for the job ready to be a national leader in just two months. Do you really think she's ready to be interviewed on Hardball or Meet the Press, all by herself, without a prepared speech or bevy of handlers?

The McCain camp as much as admitted that they would have had to out Bristol's pregnancy because the National Enquirer threatened to do so. That's not on Josh, and it's sure as hell not on "liberal bloggers." I don't think Palin's speech would have been any different if we'd "laid low." They wrote it before she was selected, and then edited it to add in the Alaska parts.

Besides, it running against "the media" is not a winning strategy. You may not like it, but people have a right to ask questions of the candidates. Had Palin been vetted, had she been presented well, had she been rolled out in a fashion that gave people some idea of her positions, then the approach to her candidacy would have been very different. Instead, she was a wildcard pick who sent everyone scrambling for information.

The top layer of information yielded precisely what you saw - family scandals and ugly stuff. This stuff might be "off limits" to some degree, for some candidates, in some cases. But in Palin's case, she was initially presented as a candidate running on her personal biography. That meant questions about "who she is" dominated the initial round of vetting. For anyone to bitch and moan about that is to deny the way that news works. She put her family out there as her credentials, so the investigation of her "credentials" yielded the sordid details of her family life. Period. Not Josh's fault. Not the fault of bloggers in general, nor progressives, nor Obama supporters. The only people to blame are McCain and Palin, who showed exactly what kind of judgment they lack by leading us into that miasma. Doesn't mean we don't also focus on Obama. But it's foolish to think that we shouldn't also be interested in finding out whatever we can about the opposition. They're not mutually exclusive.

And I also seriously doubt that anything posted by the readers on these boards has much impact beyond this insular little virtual world.

But in Palin's case, she was initially presented as a candidate running on her personal biography. That meant questions about "who she is" dominated the initial round of vetting. For anyone to bitch and moan about that is to deny the way that news works. She put her family out there as her credentials, so the investigation of her "credentials" yielded the sordid details of her family life. Period. Not Josh's fault. Not the fault of bloggers in general, nor progressives, nor Obama supporters. The only people to blame are McCain and Palin, who showed exactly what kind of judgment they lack by leading us into that miasma.

Nicely put, and a good reminder.

Right, Lalo.

Sarah Palin should be completely above criticism.

She's a hockey mom, after all.

Not that any of this stuff is the least bit important when choosing a VP candidate.

"Bitter and partisan," my ass.

When David Frum, a former speechwriter to GWB, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, columnist/diarist for National Review, contributing editor to the Weekly Standard, Canada's right-wing National Post and UK's Daily Telegraph, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and assistant editor for the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page, writes in the National Review that Palin's "experience"

makes Barack Obama look like George C. Marshall. She served two terms on the city council of Wasilla, Alaska, population 9,000. She served two terms as mayor. In November, 2006, she was elected governor of the state, a job she has held for a little more than 18 months. She has zero foreign policy experience, and no record on national security issues…. Mr. McCain's supporters argue that he is more serious about national security than Barack Obama. But the selection of Sarah Palin invites the question: How serious can he be if he would place such a neophyte second in line to the presidency?

...you might want to start wondering if the criticism is all that "bitter and partisan."

She needs to be hammered, because she's ridiculous and odious, and her selection represents everything wrong with American politics. She hasn't been savaged enough. Nor McCain for selecting her.

Obama can't do that the way media can. That's the lesson of the last 8 years. Someone else carries the water, puts the various crap into play, and he tells everyone to be nice.

The dead-enders at the convention are going to rally, because their entire being is predicated on putting their heads in the sand and chanting "USA".

The people in the middle, those are the ones who absorb the negative stuff (which is true...not manufactured), have it color their overall perceptions, how they receive and process messages and images from here to November.

This is liberal hand-wringing at its worst. The Republicans would keep kicking her in the teeth until she gave new meaning to the term 'hockey mom'.

She deserves everything she gets and more, because she is one of the ones who would legislate us into theocracy, yet has not and cannot live up to what she would impose on everyone else. Her daughter's predicament is the end result of Palin's policies and, dare I say it, parenting. If she were a Democrat, it would be prima facie evidence of her inherent sociopolitical immorality come home to roost, a sign of the apocalypse; a clear indictment of her character and judgment.

But she's a Republican, so it's "just life", let's be nice to the them, because we understand.

Well, bullshit. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Double down. Make people ill when they hear the name Sarah Palin. That's what the Republican message game is all about, deadly associations.

I've run out of cheeks to turn, so someone just needs to be punched in the nose, and it might as well be this shrewish ayatollah in sensible shoes.

Damn the torpedoes. And whatever other weapon-y kinds of things I'm forgetting.

What exactly is "tabloid" about reporting the fact that Palin lied when she said she was always agaisnt the "Bridge to Nowhere?" That she was under investigation for abuse of power in her own state? That she once tried to fire a librarian for refusing to ban any books?

What's "tabloid" here?

The problem here is that out of these 4-5 days of "vetting," has arisen a lot of valid and important issues that should be considered - lying about the Bridge to Nowhere repeatedly, the two ethics investigations, the cronyism, the censorship, etc. Unfortunately, that's all been pushed to the background by the story that most people will remember about this time now: the whole family drama nonsense. It's the juiciest, and therefore will be the most salient in memory. And yes, it does create a backlash.

This is something I had hoped would have been learned through the primary, for the same thing happened with Hillary. If you combine a legitimate issue with a nonsense sensational one, the sensational one sticks out, allowing the legit one to be mostly forgotten, and it is the sensational one, and the treatment of the issue in the media, that creates the backlash.

However, I tend to think the Republican base would have been united anyway. And, as it seems most people really have a hard time getting revved up about taking on McCain (which I think could explain the summer doldrums around here), this Palin pick has also energized the Democratic base - as evidenced by the resurgency of empassioned posts around here (even if they are misguided at times), the remarkable fundraising numbers in 24 hours, etc.

UPDATE

It seems that 99% of hardcore partisan who commented here have no idea of what I'm talking about.

Palin needs to be vetted and needs to be critized.

But this process had to be coordinated between the Nutroots and unfolded slowly.

Please don't tell me the crap that the Nutroots cannot control the faithful.

That's the reason the blogosphere exists in the first place - to provide partisan slant to campaign news.

If you look at the Republican blogs, you will be shocked that there is no difference in tone and intensity, only the names are reversed, the rest is the same.

If the blogs can whip people into a frenzy, they have control. To say they don't is a cop out. Kos and others have several best-selling books proving the blogs have control and can influence media and fanbase both openly and covertly.

What "progressives" should have done is very simple:

(1) Ignore Palin. Allow the "unkown" to remain a non-story and give her speech to the based.

(2) Start the vetting process to unfolding a slow, layered "drip drip" strategy to create doubts

Instead, progressive acted like the scared and angry teenagers. They dumped all the dirt all at once, fanned the personal smears and instantly turned Palin into a hero.

If McCain/Palin win this election, this fiasco will be added to the list of things "progressives" did to help him.

So, what you are asking for is talking points. You want a controlled response from a disparate group of people.

You blame those who sought to begin the vetting process upon her announcement for turning Palin into a hero and will pin the blame on them should McCain win the election.

Can you consider some other possibilities?

1. Maybe getting some doubts about Palin into the media in advance of the convention was a good idea. Letting the GOP role her out while remaining silent seems to me a very bad strategy (one you would have probably criticized had they gone that route).

2. That the Republicans would have focused on the small percentage of the angry left that cannot be controlled regardless what is done by the "Progressive" blogosphere. They are going to use whatever cards they are dealt or slipped into their sleeves.

3. It forced the GOP and Palin to overplay their hand. Yes, attacking the media plays well to the general public. But, she doesn't look like much of a victim after her speech. There are still two months for the questions about Palin to be explored. The faucet hasn't been turned off.

4. A certain portion of the public, let's call them Fox News watching Republicans, love talking points. After accusing Obama supporters of drinking the kool-aid you're now advocating that all Democrats do so. It's not only impossible to put everyone into your little box, it would be our downfall as a party and a nation. The appeal to independents is the welcoming of different ideas and perspectives. Yes, sometimes they tend toward the extreme which are easily criticized (some people think they are geniuses when they do so) or ignored.

So, what you are asking for is talking points. You want a controlled response from a disparate group of people.

You blame those who sought to begin the vetting process upon her announcement for turning Palin into a hero and will pin the blame on them should McCain win the election.

Can you consider some other possibilities?

1. Maybe getting some doubts about Palin into the media in advance of the convention was a good idea. Letting the GOP role her out while remaining silent seems to me a very bad strategy (one you would have probably criticized had they gone that route).

2. That the Republicans would have focused on the small percentage of the angry left that cannot be controlled regardless what is done by the "Progressive" blogosphere. They are going to use whatever cards they are dealt or slipped into their sleeves.

3. It forced the GOP and Palin to overplay their hand. Yes, attacking the media plays well to the general public. But, she doesn't look like much of a victim after her speech. There are still two months for the questions about Palin to be explored. The faucet hasn't been turned off.

4. A certain portion of the public, let's call them Fox News watching Republicans, love talking points. After accusing Obama supporters of drinking the kool-aid you're now advocating that all Democrats do so. It's not only impossible to put everyone into your little box, it would be our downfall as a party and a nation. The appeal to independents is the welcoming of different ideas and perspectives. Yes, sometimes they tend toward the extreme which are easily criticized (some people think they are geniuses when they do so) or ignored.

Once again, I'm not talking about commenters like you and me. I'm talking about people who control what gets reported on the blogs' front pages and news pages. This is called messaging.

I did consider other possibilities and rejected them. If you want to be consistent and honest, you will remember that Josh Marshall went through a phase of impotent anger over the Celebrity phase, until he finally decided to that to win against the Republicans we have to outplay them in their own game.

I think that games is pretty simple and you certainly capture a good element of it. But I think the ball was dropped by the progressives on Palin and it did serious damage to Obama.

Let's how how well the progressives get in tune on what's going to be going on in the next few weeks.

I don't get the criticism over the celebrity phase. Should Josh have not highlighted the ridiculous attempts to link Obama to Britney and Paris? Did he spend too much time on McCain's multiple houses? Would you prefer only The Daily Show and Colbert report on the hypocrisy of the GOP in small funny sound bytes?

My feeling is that your perspective on Palin is fairly limited. I would say mine is as well. This is part of the problem. I'm betting the polling on her as extremely favorable (5) and extremely unfavorable (1) will be pretty small among the independents / undecideds where it matters. They will want to hear more from Palin in part because of the questions that have been raised here and elsewhere. Things are not set in stone.

As for messaging, I'm not sure I want that going beyond the campaign. They should attempt to get their message out there and I'm happy for the progressive outlets to do their own thinking and reporting. I'd hate to see it managed like the GOP does as much would be lost. If we disagree with one of those outlets often enough we stop visiting. Or, it might be the opposite as was the case for me with Andrew Sullivan in the beginning. TPM gives a forum to talk about our differences and doesn't attempt to silence dissent. And, commenters like me are listening and want to better understand your criticism. I appreciate your expressing your views.

Lalo,

Thanks for the update to lay out your concerns. Clearly they are valid. We are playing tag with a tiger here. Not Palin. The Republican Noise Machine. They lie and lie loudly, call fouls on the very plays they make every day...deride Tim Kaine for inexperience or Jamie Lynn Spears's parents for neglect, then praise Sarah Palin as an accomplished executive and parental role model...chide Hillary Clinton for whining then call out the media for rampant sexism. And they do it in unison, on every channel, from every surrogate, repeating the same inacuurate statements or smearing themes over and over again. Scary, but effective.

So they can easily "tar baby" us with their very vulnerable VP pick. The Obama team sniffed this trap out quickly and said "don't touch that" to the most tempting tidbits about the Alaskan govenor. And they were right.

As you well point out, this does not mean don't vet her...it does mean let the press do the vetting and stay away from the tawdry. That is THEIR game, not ours.

So we will stick to the issues...you know the things McCain's campaign manager says this election is NOt about.

P.S. Let's not blame Josh or Kos. They provide the room. We do the talking.

Lalo, for me the Sally Quinn piece was enough to make me look around to see where I was. An actual Democratic Feminist saying that a woman with 5 kids doesn't have the time to be both VP and Mom? What the heck is that?

Lalo, for me the Sally Quinn piece was enough to make me look around to see where I was. An actual Democratic Feminist saying that a woman with 5 kids doesn't have the time to be both VP and Mom? What the heck is that?

You know what? I happened upon a North Carolina "Mommies" blog/forum site today. I'd visited it once or twice before. Just regular mom stuff, no politics ordinarily. But Sarah Palin has the place lit up - posts, discussion threads, etc. And these are the topics of discussion. Not, for the most part, in Palin's favor. Even the people who "lean Republican," "support John McCain," "admire her accomplishments," "like her spunk," etc. etc. There are serious doubts about her amongst the "soccer mom" set (and quite a few "hockey moms" down here, too, apparently) - on policy and personality.

And while there were numerous "the kids should be left out" statements, there was also a general consensus that Palin's judgments and actions as a parent, and her positions on policies that impact families and children are totally fair game. Obviously, it's hard to separate her "persona" and her personal life from her policy, when she has linked them so closely herself. But your average "low information voter" is more capable in this operation than some folks might expect.

So I think it's way too early to say that the attention on Palin has hurt Obama, or that any particular line of questioning is totally unreasonable. What seems like a ridiculous question to you might carry a lot of weight for someone else. I never got the "who would you like to have a beer with" stuff, and I don't understand people who vote that way. But I've learned not to be dismissive - it's better to ask "why is this important to you?" than to say flat out "this isn't important!"

Because, apparently, to a bunch of moms in North Carolina, Palin's ability to do an incredibly difficult job while also raising five children, including a special needs infant and a pregnant teenager - well, to them that is an important candidate question. They're not necessarily saying she can or can't; they're necessarily being "sexist" or dismissive; they might or might not have a different take if Palin was a male candidate, if she came to the job with more/different "experience," etc. etc. etc. The point is, they are asking questions about the candidate, and that's one of them. Don't dismiss that just because you think it's crazy or unimportant or un-PC or otherwise off-limits. Cuz, last I heard, we want to win North Carolina. And we don't have to be nasty or pile on or say anything stupid about Palin - but we also don't have to treat her like she's porcelain.

"America's newest Erin Brockovich"

Why because she wants to drill, drill, drill?

CFMA!!

Lalo, for me the Sally Quinn piece was enough to make me look around to see where I was. An actual Democratic Feminist saying that a woman with 5 kids doesn't have the time to be both VP and Mom? What the heck is that?

Wow, you pointed out some hypocrisy on the left. Do you want a prize or something?

Sally Quinn doesn't speak for the Obama campaign, so what's your point. You read one hypocritical piece from a Democrat and you sell your soul? So transparent.

I just wonder when lalo will earn enough McSurge points for that I heart USA mouse pad.

I just wonder when lalo will earn enough McSurge points for that I heart USA mouse pad.

No. You're just an idiot and don't know about it.

This is war. Republicans are our enemies. Republicans are traitors to democracy. We have to smash them and put them on the back burner of history forever.

This is war. Republicans are our enemies. Republicans are traitors to democracy. We have to smash them and put them on the back burner of history forever.

This is war. Republicans are our enemies. Republicans are traitors to democracy. We have to smash them and put them on the back burner of history forever.

EVERYONE SHOULD WATCH THIS creepy promotional video for a workshop at Wasilla Assembly of God (Sarah Palin's longtime church)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJnhRhJW35o


When you watch this video REMEMBER...this was Sarah Palin's church for nearly her entire life.

The man with in the leather jacket donning a goatee was Sarah Palin's pastor from 1999 till 2002.

She continues to have close ties to this church and is involved with workshops there.

Lalo, you bring up a vlid point about not falling for the Palin bait, but you completely dismiss the vetting of relevant issues about her views and past actions as a public official. I don't get you, you always bring up a good point or two, but then fail to complete the circle by offering a better alternative.

It seems you would like us to lay off her record as the Earmark Queen of Wasilla or her blatant lie about the Bridge to Nowhere. A few asshats went off the reservation and questioned her motherhood. But that was just a few idiots who couldn't resist the utter hypoccisy involved.
TPM was among the first blogs to get around to dealing with the real vetting, and it was contributors, not the editors who pushed the tabloid shit. So stop being disingenuous and throwing bombs all the time. You know damn well Josh didn't push the baby shit until it had political implications, based on the sexism charges, and all the BS that Karl Rove fed us.

TPM has been fair, why haven't you?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address