Darn it! One thousand apologies for the big blank post. When I tabbed into the box, I learned that my return key was malfunctioning and it just kept adding lines and though I tried to back out, apparently I ended-up posting. Once again, sorry. It's a cheap replacement keyboard, if that helps.
Anyway...
Because the censorship issue was one of the first things that I noticed in the infamous "open letter", I've been trying to halfway keep up with that aspect and though the dupe posting means that I may have missed it, I haven't seen the following posted to this site.
Ordinarily, I try to not just post links, but the Frontiersman, the Wasilla paper has reprinted their story from '96 on the subject and I thought it may be of interest to more than just myself.
And, though I'm not going to bother them with a follow-up, but if anyone has access to their archives or more information, I'd kind of be interested in what happened and how Councilwoman Palin had reacted, the previous year.
Again, apologies for the big blank post.
PS) If someone wants to take this link, maybe sit on it for a while and repost into something readable, I'd fully support that effort.
Gee, I thought the McCain-Palin Thought Police had commandeered your post and created an infamous "18-paragraph gap."
Post a Comment
Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker! Ads are how we pay the bills!
Comments (3)
Darn it! One thousand apologies for the big blank post. When I tabbed into the box, I learned that my return key was malfunctioning and it just kept adding lines and though I tried to back out, apparently I ended-up posting. Once again, sorry. It's a cheap replacement keyboard, if that helps.
Anyway...
Because the censorship issue was one of the first things that I noticed in the infamous "open letter", I've been trying to halfway keep up with that aspect and though the dupe posting means that I may have missed it, I haven't seen the following posted to this site.
Ordinarily, I try to not just post links, but the Frontiersman, the Wasilla paper has reprinted their story from '96 on the subject and I thought it may be of interest to more than just myself.
Link: Palin: Library censorship inquiries 'Rhetorical'
And, though I'm not going to bother them with a follow-up, but if anyone has access to their archives or more information, I'd kind of be interested in what happened and how Councilwoman Palin had reacted, the previous year.
Again, apologies for the big blank post.
September 7, 2008 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
PS) If someone wants to take this link, maybe sit on it for a while and repost into something readable, I'd fully support that effort.
September 7, 2008 5:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, I thought the McCain-Palin Thought Police had commandeered your post and created an infamous "18-paragraph gap."
September 7, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment