« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
OBAMA DELAYS TROOP WITHDRAWAL?
The latest Obama news story to sweep the internet is one that comes from that bastion of excellence in journalism, THE NEW YORK POST. Amir Taheri wrote that in July, Sen. Obama spoke with members of the Iraqi government and urged them to delay any agreement with the US to begin troop withdrawals. Every conservative blogger (and several major news sources, including Fox News) not only ran with the story but they all expressed similar outrage over the indignity of wanting to keep the troops there. “WHAT??? Sen. Obama is willing to keep our soldiers over there longer because it helps his political career? It only goes to prove he doesn’t “put country first”! He’ll do ANYTHING to win an election! And besides, he’s a Muslim too!”
Taheri wrote a great article for the Post. Very in-depth, with quotes attributed to the Iraqi Foreign Minister Zebari that claimed Sen. Obama made the delay a focal point of his talks with the Iraqi government.
Being a supporter of Obama’s and knowing the less than sterling reputation of the Post for journalistic standards, I wondered about truthfulness of the story.
So I googled the author of the article; Amir Taheri, and found some interesting facts about the man. He was a Senior Editor for a major Iranian newspaper under the Shaw of Iran’s government. He is now a political refugee from Iran who has advocated for the overthrow of the present government. He is also an advisor to Pres. George Bush. Here is a man who’s ONLY hope of returning to his homeland rests on the hopes that either the US or Israel will overthrow the government of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. (Now if that doesn’t raise an eyebrow and make you question the authenticity of this story I don’t know what will.)
Unless of course it’s the number of times he has been caught fabricating sources, quotes and story lines before in his writing. What you ask? He lied? How could that be? I read in on the internet!
Here are the real facts about the man accusing Sen. Barack Obama of meddling in George Bush’s foreign policy.
1) Most famously, on May 19, 2006, Taheri wrote a story for Canada’s NATIONAL POST about a new Iranian law requiring Iranian Jews and other religious minorities to wear colored badges at all times while on the streets of Tehren. This caused an immediate sensation and was picked up by many mainstream media sources and ran as a legitimate story. The bloggers went crazy with this story. But the story was simply NOT TRUE! Within hours the NATIONAL POST was alerted to the problem and had pulled the story from their website, blaming Taheri for misleading them.
2) In 1989, Taheri published a book about the rise and fall of the Shah of Iran entitled “NEST OF SPIES”. Larry Cohler-Esses wrote of the book in THE NATION, that it cited "nonexistent sources," it fabricated "nonexistent substance in cases where the sources existed," and distorted the facts "beyond recognition.” Other than that it was a really nice read.
3) In 2005, he said that Iran’s Ambassador to the UN had taken an active part in the takeover of the US embassy in Tehren in 1979. This too went all over the internet. It was however disproven by the Ambassador’s teacher! "This allegation is false," San Francisco State University professor Dwight Simpson wrote to the New York Post (which had published a Taheri column making the claim). "On November 4, 1979 [the day of the seizure], Javad Zarif was in San Francisco. He was then a graduate student in the Department of International Relations of San Francisco State University. He was my student, and he served also as my teaching assistant." Somebody is obviously lying, and I know who I’m betting on.
So we now have a highly provocative story written by a questionable source with no outside confirmation by any other news source. But that hasn’t stopped Fox News and other media outlets from running with it as if it were gospel. It hasn’t kept it from being the blog of the hour on numerous sites.
It’s hard to decide who you want to blame more for this type of shoddy journalism: The media that doesn’t do it’s job in checking sources or the conservative bloggers who happily spread rumor without thought to truth. Or maybe as Pogo once said, “We have met the enemy and they is us.” You know; US, people like you and me who know better but don’t demand the standard of excellence from our media that we deserve both individually and as a nation.
So if you see this story printed anywhere, let the person promoting it know that you know who Amir Taheri is…and you expect more from them than slander, innuendo and lies. You expect NEWS








Comments (12)
reprinted from www.nemokc.blogspot.com
September 16, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd already hit on the simple and obvious fact that Obama, not being in office, is not in a position to either delay or speed up anything regarding the troops over which he is not the Commander-in-Chief.
Nor in a postion to make or alter foreign policy.
And I nailed the original poster of that smear for being averse to critical thought and facts.
September 16, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reagan wasn't in office when he interfered with the release of hostages by Iran. Duh.
September 16, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or McSame's handlers when they started the little Georgian flare up.
Oh wait, this not good parralel example as McCain's "handlers" are the current Rove/Cheney administration.
September 17, 2008 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your point about the media is important. It is not enough for us to be greater participants in our relationship with our government, we also need to be greater participants in our relationship with our media. We need to push back and let them know that we expect 'facts' or to be more clear 'the truth'. If they want the trust and responsibility of informing us then they need to give us truthful information. They need to stop profiting from promoting lies. When they take money for advertisements about political candidates, regardless of party, they are being political and promoting those lies in a betrayal of public trust. The media must have stronger boudaries and stop playing victim here. It is a scam that they have moved toward because it allows them to make a lot more money.
We also need a better educated american population so that we are all able to better participate in an intelligent way with our media and our government.
It has served the neocons and the media to dumb america down, they have profited greatly from it at the expense of our pocketbooks and our democracy.
September 16, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have argued this for years. There needs to be a way to put leverage on them. The only leverage the public has ever been able to wield is boycotts and the threat of them The Evangelical right uses this tactic to intimidate the media ALL the time. Look what happened to Dan Rather. The media should not be able to get away with publishing mis-information. That is professional malfeasance. It is too important to the public interest. We will never make progress in the info wars if we cannot get rid of the zombie lies.
September 16, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's made it to TPMMuckraker, sort of.
September 16, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me just be clear here, since it seems people are still recommending this. It's been debunked on TPMMuckraker.
September 16, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even McLiar did not attack on this bs.
The source is a kook like Baghdad Bob or Larry Johnson.
September 16, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do not attack the "messenger," rebut the substance. it is easy to do.
The short version is that Obama talked (and explained publicly) about the Status of Forces Agreement which has nothing to do with short-term troop levels. Taheri was either too excited to actually understand what he was writing about or then is intentionally lying.
The long version at the Muckraker link above.
September 17, 2008 8:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mb>Obama/Taheri Story in the Post Confirmed
By The Prowler
Published 9/17/2008 12:08:47 AM
STANDING BY THE STORY
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13897
September 17, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, no-one is denying that the Status of Forces and the so-called Strategic Framework Agreement were discussed.
In fact, Obama discussed this publicly at the time.
The problem is that Taheri and other idiots do not understand what the Agreement is about. Do you? It has nothing to do with short-term redeployments.
http://www.cfr.org/publication/16448/
September 17, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment