« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
McCain Threatens To Sue National Enquirer, Over Report That Sarah Palin Had Affair With Her Husband's Business Partner...YUP! YUP!
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml
Excerpt:
CBS)From CBS News' John Bentley:
(ST. PAUL, MINN.) – John McCain’s campaign threatened legal action
against the National Enquirer today for running a story about McCain’s
running mate, Sarah Palin, allegedly having an affair with her
husband’s business partner.
Advertisement








Comments (95)
Oh goody!
September 3, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
You guys are laughing now, but McCain/Palin has started to scare the shit out of the media with this bullying tactic. After the Palin speech, I only saw a few journalists with integrity who spoke with caution, but the rest--one pundit after another just gushed about how great the Palin speech was.
How about we write the media and tell them what we think? Praise the good ones, mock the talking idiots, or whatever. But get them to know it's ok to ask questions and vet Palin. That's not sexist to question her on her judgment, her lies, her integrity. How does she repeat her lie about the Bridge to nowhere on National TV, her main claim to restore government integrity, twice now, and the talkign idiots say the lie is not a big deal?
September 4, 2008 6:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because to paraphrase Peggy Noonan off-air, they always go for that "political narrative bullshit."
There was never any way they were honest about her speech. Let's just be glad it's over and hope we can get some honesty now and in the VP debate (doubtful, but we can hope).
The real question is what do low info swing voters think. It's hard to know. Sometimes I think overplaying your hand may just as likely backfire, as with the GOP sexism cries and anger at the media. I'm sure a lot of women won't appreciate what they'll likely see as her getting selected solely b/c she's a woman.
September 4, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the National Enquirer cover:
http://news.spreadit.org/palin-affairnational-enquirer-palin-affair-rumor/
Here's another article on her dispute with her daughter:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/sarah_palin_at_war_with_her_daughter_over_pregnancy_wedding/celebrity/65370
September 4, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the National Enquirer cover:
http://news.spreadit.org/palin-affairnational-enquirer-palin-affair-rumor/
Here's another article on her dispute with her daughter:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/sarah_palin_at_war_with_her_daughter_over_pregnancy_wedding/celebrity/65370
September 4, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Enquirer is usually right on these things, because they don't want to get sued, but Edwards never threatened to sue them, because he was busted. We'll see how this plays out, but it seems the other party could be tracked down and interviewed and the truth would come out -- like Reille Hunter.
September 4, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The media isn't afraid of McCain and his campaign. McCain's people should be very very afraid of the media and this tactic of running against the media, keeping Palin away from interviews, will backfire big time. There's an old saying: Never get into a pissing contest with people who buy printer's ink by the truckload. Any campaign -- any campaign -- needs the media, or its message goes nowhere.
The biggest mistake is keeping her from the press. Even the dumbest of the dumb has to wonder why they don't want her to be interviewed. It's obvious that they're afraid she'll bungle it trying to talk about the economy and foreign policy, two issues that the press is chomping at the bit to corner her on, show her inexperience. The worst thing about this tactic is that reporters are like alligators -- you don't have to love them and you don't have to pet them, but you do have to feed them. If you give them nothing, they'll go after you because they have to. Behind every journalist is a big mean editor, pounding the desk and demanding a story. If you don't give them something, they'll dig where you didn't even know you had corners. This is PR crisis management 101.
It's going to get very interesting in the next couple of weeks.
September 4, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It would never happen but it'd be great if the media called McCain's bluff. Just loaded up their cameras and stuff and drove off. Let him make his speech to the people in the hall and that's it.
McCain would be chasing them down the street, "Please come back!"
September 4, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liberal Elite: As a former reporter and current PR flack, I can attest that you are dead-on.
Sometimes that editor pressure translates into good muckraking and sometimes it translates into trading editorial blowjobs for access (see Bush White House Press Corps), but the pressure's always there.
Thanks for explaining it so well.
September 4, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Love your
September 4, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The media isn't afraid of McCain and his campaign. McCain's people should be very very afraid of the media and this tactic of running against the media, keeping Palin away from interviews, will backfire big time. There's an old saying: Never get into a pissing contest with people who buy printer's ink by the truckload. Any campaign -- any campaign -- needs the media, or its message goes nowhere.
The biggest mistake is keeping her from the press. Even the dumbest of the dumb has to wonder why they don't want her to be interviewed. It's obvious that they're afraid she'll bungle it trying to talk about the economy and foreign policy, two issues that the press is chomping at the bit to corner her on, show her inexperience. The worst thing about this tactic is that reporters are like alligators -- you don't have to love them and you don't have to pet them, but you do have to feed them. If you give them nothing, they'll go after you because they have to. Behind every journalist is a big mean editor, pounding the desk and demanding a story. If you don't give them something, they'll dig where you didn't even know you had corners. This is PR crisis management 101.
It's going to get very interesting in the next couple of weeks.
September 4, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
The media isn't afraid of McCain and his campaign. McCain's people should be very very afraid of the media and this tactic of running against the media, keeping Palin away from interviews, will backfire big time. There's an old saying: Never get into a pissing contest with people who buy printer's ink by the truckload. Any campaign -- any campaign -- needs the media, or its message goes nowhere.
The biggest mistake is keeping her from the press. Even the dumbest of the dumb has to wonder why they don't want her to be interviewed. It's obvious that they're afraid she'll bungle it trying to talk about the economy and foreign policy, two issues that the press is chomping at the bit to corner her on, show her inexperience. The worst thing about this tactic is that reporters are like alligators -- you don't have to love them and you don't have to pet them, but you do have to feed them. If you give them nothing, they'll go after you because they have to. Behind every journalist is a big mean editor, pounding the desk and demanding a story. If you don't give them something, they'll dig where you didn't even know you had corners. This is PR crisis management 101.
It's going to get very interesting in the next couple of weeks.
September 4, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The media isn't afraid of McCain and his campaign. McCain's people should be very very afraid of the media and this tactic of running against the media, keeping Palin away from interviews, will backfire big time. There's an old saying: Never get into a pissing contest with people who buy printer's ink by the truckload. Any campaign -- any campaign -- needs the media, or its message goes nowhere.
The biggest mistake is keeping her from the press. Even the dumbest of the dumb has to wonder why they don't want her to be interviewed. It's obvious that they're afraid she'll bungle it trying to talk about the economy and foreign policy, two issues that the press is chomping at the bit to corner her on, show her inexperience. The worst thing about this tactic is that reporters are like alligators -- you don't have to love them and you don't have to pet them, but you do have to feed them. If you give them nothing, they'll go after you because they have to. Behind every journalist is a big mean editor, pounding the desk and demanding a story. If you don't give them something, they'll dig where you didn't even know you had corners. This is PR crisis management 101.
It's going to get very interesting in the next couple of weeks.
September 4, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry about all the multiple postings, folks (can anyone delete the repeats, please?) but the comment system seems haywire today!
September 4, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that they think the Enquirer is a valid news outlet speaks VOLUMES. I do agree that people need to hold the feet of the press to the fire. This is unacceptable for them to tip toe around this woman. Particularly after what they put the Obama campaign through.
September 4, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
"You guys are laughing now, but McCain/Palin has started to scare the shit out of the media with this bullying tactic."
Oh, Please. The National Enquirer is scared of the threat of a lawsuit? Come on, that's laughable.
Palin is a public figure, so lawsuits for libel or slander are nearly impossible to win. What else are they going to sue them for?
The fact is that the McBush campaign is ecstatic to have everyone talk about anything other than McBush.
That's the bottom line.
CFMA!!
September 4, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep the pot boiling.
Click it on up folks.
John McCain is the one who drew attention to it,
so let us help him out.
Do your duty.
Onwards Christen Soldiers.
Click it on up. YUP! YUP!
September 3, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep the pot boiling.
Click it on up folks.
John McCain is the one who drew attention to it,
so let us help him out.
Do your duty.
Onwards Christen Soldiers.
Click it on up. YUP! YUP!
September 3, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps this is why John McCain called Sarah Barracuda, "my soulmate".
This request goes out to John and Sarah on his their big soulmates coming out night.
All the best; you pair of wacky fun loving little Fundies!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw8k2JupTwA
September 3, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my that shoe does pinch when it's on the other foot, don't it?
LOL!
I hope he sues - that would rock. Think of what would come out in depositions.
O. My. Gawd.
September 3, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
LMAO!
Which is why he won't sue. If he's smart. But then he picked Sarah...
September 3, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain reads the Enquirer so we don't have to.
A true public servant.
September 3, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well it's not really so surprising or shocking at this point is it? It has the ring of truth to me. The National Enquirer was right about John Edwards after all.
September 3, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was the business partner married?
I hope not so that he divulges ALL!!
September 3, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was the business partner a man?
September 4, 2008 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Was the business partner married?
I hope not so that he divulges ALL!!
September 3, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain reads the Enquirer so we don't have to.
A true public servant.
September 3, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain reads the Enquirer so we don't have to.
A true public servant.
September 3, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain reads the Enquirer so we don't have to.
A true public servant.
September 3, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that it is the McCain camp that is threatening to sue, and not Sarah Palin, makes the story appear to be even more credible.
McCain has no standing to bring such a lawsuit, so it is clearly a cover up attempt.
Click on recommend. Keep the pot boiling. Help John McCain to spread the word.
Onwards Christen Soldiers.
Click it on up. YUP! YUP!
September 3, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liam,
Actually, McCain does have standing if he can substantiate that he was 'harmed' by the story. (But only if the content is not true, it is true, well, I guess he could sue Sarah!)
Rec'd. Thanks for this!
September 3, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Defamation suits can only be maintained by the defamed person, not relatives, running mates, etc.
What legal theory are you considering when you see McCain as a plaintiff?
September 3, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
He could join as a party. But no he cannot bring the suit himself.
September 3, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a party? What would he be after joinder?
September 3, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
A party.
?
What does your question mean? People join suits all the time as 3d parties.
September 4, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong.
September 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Defamation suits are PERSONAL torts. The story would have to print a falsehood about McCain in order for McCain to have standing to pursue a defamation claim. And this is all aside from the fact that you run into the "public figure" buzz saw for pursuing this suit on behalf of a politician.
It won't happen. It's just posturing to get the N.E. to back off, and I'm pretty sure N.E. is more of an expert at this game than the McCain camp, so I doubt if it will be all that effective.
September 4, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Plus - NE will make more money from the controversy than it would cost them to defend the case even if it turns out to be untrue.
September 4, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, John... come sue all of us!!!
September 3, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is the herpes of candidates...the gift that keeps giving!
September 3, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
That CBS News blog strikes me as bizarrely offkey.
The headline: "McCain camp knocks down Enquirer's Palin affair rumor."
Well, the campaign sure does vigorously deny it, calling it a smear, "a vicious lie," "categorically false," and "a disgrace."
It may well be all those things, but the McCain camp is hardly in a position to know any more definitively than the Enquirer, are they?
So they haven't exactly "knocked it down."
The Enquirer did get the John Edwards affair right, after all, despite vehement denials. Even "respectable" mainstream journalists grant them that.
In his eagerness to back the McCain camp's line, Bentley, in his own voice, adds this:
“The Enquirer also alleges that Palin unjustly fired a public safety official while she was governor of Alaska, but the story is based entirely on unnamed sources. The Enquirer has also paid sources in the past to speak with them, something mainstream media outlets do not do."
Now, unlike the affair story, there is plenty of public documentation for the firing story. And Bentley also offers no evidence the Enquirer paid its sources in this case.
This CBS reporter seems to be buying into what I'm sure the McCain camp is pushing: anything critical you read about Palin is unquestionably a smear and a lie.
Not just when it comes from the Enquirer.
Those appearances at the Alaska Independence Party convention? Just another scurrilous rumor!
They are warning the MSM to back off, and there's an excellent chance they will.
CBS News is already in the bag.
September 3, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
This just in:
Mel Brooks has just started working on a new Broadway Musical:
The working title of it is:
SPRINGER TIME FOR REPUBLICANS AND THEOCRACY.
September 3, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone should have told McCain that it's foolish to call another woman "soulmate" in front of the whole nation and in the present of his wife (especially one that made you sign a prenuptial agreement). If there were more salacious details coming out from this woman's past, he'd end up with none of the 8 houses.
September 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone should have told McCain that it's foolish to call another woman "soulmate" in front of the whole nation and in the present of his wife (especially one that made you sign a prenuptial agreement). If there were more salacious details coming out from this woman's past, he'd end up with none of the 8 houses.
September 3, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR MCCAIN!!!
September 3, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
McMentum!!!
September 3, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
You must be in the convention hall itself, idiotic! "Keep up the fight", as Ron Fournier would say.
September 4, 2008 2:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true... Please be true...
September 3, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto, ditto, ditto...etc.
September 3, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't matter if she had an affair because the man was a POW.
September 4, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
And what does the Enquirer have to say about them being sued?
I wouldn't put much into it>
September 3, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, I might just actually have to break down and buy a National Enquirer for the first time in my life.
September 3, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You'll find it's the only reliable source of inside information, now that the beloved Weekly World News isn't published anymore.
September 4, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You'll find it's the only reliable source of inside information, now that the beloved Weekly World News isn't published anymore ("Smoke Plume in the Shape of Jesus!" "Bat Boy Spotted at Supreme Court!" "Aliens Visit George Bush!").
September 4, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
My how times have changed...in a good way. Did you click on the CBS link? How about the loaded crap that ABC puts out?
The republicans don't get it. Once upon a time they could control the story. They had enough corporate money and the MSM in their back pockets to ensure only the story they wanted told came out. If you look at ABC's track record this election and the CBS article referenced here, it appears they are still trying to control it.
They had gotten so cocky that they did not see Obama coming. They thought his line was just a gimmick - that ordinary people can do extraordinary things. It was too late for the RNC once they realized that if people are empowered with the opportunity to find out the truth themselves they will. The web makes it easy.
Republicans did not count on the internet and the incredible potential power to make or break a publican figure. Unlike the MSM, there is no way they can control the storyline.
Yea!!!! Free at Last!!!!
I cannot wait to see what turns up :)
September 3, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
To quote that great sage, Flounder:
ISN'T THIS GREAT?????
September 3, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the line is "Oh boy, is this great!!"
September 3, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I will be buying a National Enquirer for the first time in my life. I already feel dirty.
September 3, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the line is "Oh boy, is this great!!"
September 3, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is he the father?
September 3, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is he the father?
September 3, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hint: if you make a comment, and you get a server error, do not hit the refresh button. That is what creates the multiple posts. Go to another page then come back to this one. Your comment will then show up only once. (I could be wrong, but that has been my experience so far with TPM's overloaded servers)
September 4, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
The National Enquirer even though I question some of the stories they run. They are nearly always true. Would like to be fly on the wall and know their source. Guess have to buy Enquirer tonight.
September 4, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
So true. Especially the ones about Martian babies! All I can say is, I sure would love for this one to be true. If it is, you can bet it'll come out. Someone always knows, and someone always talks -- especially to the Inquirer, because THEY PAY!
September 4, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The National Enquirer even though I question some of the stories they run. They are nearly always true. Would like to be fly on the wall and know their source. Guess have to buy Enquirer tonight.
September 4, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
The National Enquirer lies a lot, and has lost and settled for cases in court. This time, they have no evidence.
September 4, 2008 6:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The New & Improved GOP Vetting Process
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-AiqGC0buo
The voicemail
http://www.236.com/blog/w/lee_camp/mccains_voice_mail_to_palin_le_8644.php
September 4, 2008 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems the folks at the Enquirer were Republican heros just a few short weeks ago. Did you ever think you'd live to see the day when the publishers of the National Enquirer and Penthouse were bigger muckrackers than the folks at the New York Times?
September 4, 2008 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
They were heros because the Edwards' allegations had evidence to back them up. There's no evidence here.
September 4, 2008 6:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can you state that so positively? Do you base that on something in the Enquirer's story?
Should the story be true, by rights it shouldn't disqualify her. It ought to be considered a private matter. But of course the precedents are inconsistent as with Henry Hyde and Bob Livingston.
Should this be true we ought to refrain from
trumpeting our pleasure . Both because we
ought to consider it a private matter and because to the extent we pile on , that will become the issue.
September 4, 2008 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Truthseeker, how do you know that there is no evidence?
September 4, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Truthseeker, how do you know that there is no evidence?
September 4, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Truthseeker, how do you know that there is no evidence?
September 4, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
putting focus on the enquirer allows them to equate any "attacks" with tabloid smears. despite being right about edwards, on the whole people still assume that the enquirer has a very tenuous relationship with the truth. they aren't really going to pursue a suit, but pretending they will, allows them to benefit from this framing.
September 4, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nat Enq = low info voter goldmine
September 4, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know nothing about the veracity of the National Enquirer story, though I do know that the nights get long up north.
Here's a gratuitous haiku for you, inspired not directly by Governor Palin but by her family:
arctic alsaka
they say let's drill here, drill now
levi and bristol
September 4, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know nothing about the veracity of the National Enquirer story, though I do know that the nights get long up north.
Here's a gratuitous haiku for you, inspired not directly by Governor Palin but by her family:
arctic alsaka /
they say let's drill here, drill now /
levi and bristol
September 4, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama had the same morals as McCain he could now viably run his own commercial linking Palin with Paris and Britney!! Who knows? Maybe Palin will have a head-shaving episode before this is all over.
September 4, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama had the same morals as McCain he could now viably run his own commercial linking Palin with Paris and Britney!! Who knows? Maybe Palin will have a head-shaving episode before this is all over.
September 4, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry about the double posting of my earlier message; I dutifully refrained from reposting after I got a "server error" message, but I did repost after an initial try that didn't even seem to connect with the server at all.
I also apologize for misspelling "alaska."
September 4, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's an old adage about lying down with dogs and getting fleas! Smart people do not file defamation actions. That rule is squared when public figures are involved: check with lawyers for Ariel Sharon and William Westmoreland.
On standing: I cannot imagine how a political campaign committee could pursue a defamation suit in its own name. It can pay for the suit, but the statements it complains about say nothing about it.
Finally, I thought the wingnuts were complaining about too much drama in the White House in the 1990s. Maybe they really miss the Clintons!
September 4, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mel Brooks is working on a new Broadway Musical:
SPRINGER TIME FOR REPUBLICANS AND THEOCRACY.
September 4, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain can launch a law suit delay past election and then dismiss it.
The political campaign can be a plaintiff if it referenced both Palin and McCain as candidates or teh McCain campaign.
September 4, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
On the Ed Schultz Show yesterday someone called in whose brother or friend or someone close works for the National Enquirer. He said the story is true but the media is afraid to touch it. If we keep pushing it online someone may take a look.
September 4, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mel Brooks' next Broadway Musical:
SPRINGER TIME FOR REPUBLICANS AND THEOCRACY.
September 4, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good finds Ohiomeister.
Now we know that the National Enquirer, not the Dems, is the source for the outing of Palin's daughter.
September 4, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Read the CBS piece by Bentley, who calls himself a "journalist" yet shows complete and total ignorance of the Troopergate scandal. Schmidt has played him perfectly like a puppet, getting Bentley to completely associate Troopergate with a tabloid allegation of a (totally irrelevant) extramarital affair. You people are fools to trumpet this. Do not recommend.
September 4, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the extramarital affair is centrally relevant to the "narrative" of the "family values" Abstinence Only fraud.
We have a right to know: Is she a LIAR, whatever the issue she LIES about?
If such can be used by Republicans to destroy such as Edwards, then scandal-on-the-other-foot is what goes around.
September 4, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are they going to claim next that Obama is the publisher of National Enquirer? "Enquiring" minds want to know.
September 4, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is hilarious. Before he picked Palin did John McCain think that part of his job was going to be suing the National Enquirer?
My answer to that is, once he became smitten with his "soulmate" there was no turning back.
McCain is a man of impulses bordering on rage. Very dangerous.
September 4, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who is going to get the "Trooper" interview?
September 4, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find this all too delicious. After all, isn't it mostly the small town blue collar folks that buy the Enquirer at their local check out stand? Isn't this the demographic that Sarah is supposed to help McCain with?
September 4, 2008 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Enquirer also alleges that Palin unjustly fired a public safety official while she was governor of Alaska, but the story is based entirely on unnamed sources.
I guess if you don't include the Public Safety Commissioner, who has gone on record to say that Failin Palin's a liar.
In fact, it's pretty well established at this point that Failin's a serial liar. She lied several times throughout her speech.
September 4, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man. You guys have made my day!. i felt do sick to my stomach after the speech last night, but after coming on TPM and seeing what this woman is facing, i cant help but feel giddy.
I'm not happy at her problems, but seeing what she had to say last night, now Mccain is HIDING her!!!!.
The press has tasted and smelled blood. this woman is done..the national enquirer????....
Oh My.
September 4, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man. You guys have made my day!. i felt do sick to my stomach after the speech last night, but after coming on TPM and seeing what this woman is facing, i cant help but feel giddy.
I'm not happy at her problems, but seeing what she had to say last night, now Mccain is HIDING her!!!!.
The press has tasted and smelled blood. this woman is done..the national enquirer????....
Oh My.
September 4, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment