« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Lazy Days as Commander-in-Chef: Palin never fired chef, only worked part-time
Aside from having listed a state plane on eBay, the most popular anecdotal example of Sarah Palin’s credentials as a reformer has been her firing the governor’s chef. This has been quickly seized on by clueless Lower 48 Palin partisans as a colorful example of belt-tighting via downhome folksiness: Palin didn't just kick out the "uppity" gourmet chef, she claimed she planned on cooking herself, with her kids chipping in to make sandwiches.
As you might expect, this turns out to be another Palin fabrication. The 6/29/07 Anchorage Daily News article about the firing actually reveals the shocking truth behind the deception.
First, firing the governor's chef saved no money at all, because the chef was transferred, not fired. In the article, an e-mail from the fired chef, Stefani Marnon, to friends and colleagues is quoted as saying "Friday will be my last day at the house, but I will still be employed with the state."
The chef Sarah fired in fact still prepares elitist gourmet meals in Juneau for government employees, just not in the Governor’s Mansion. According to an item in this ADN article from 1/20/08:
"Stefani Marnon was first reassigned as a ‘constituent relations assistant’ in the governor's office and later to the state museum. Earwigs report she's finally landed where they really appreciate a good chef: the Legislative Lounge. Lawmakers were smacking their lips in anticipation, according to Sen. Kim Elton's newsletter."
Sarah Palin, far from being a down-home fiscal hawk standing up to a decadent government culture, first placed Marnon in a make-work job, then placed the chef where her presence would most appeal to political insiders, literally catering to the finicky taste buds of state politicians.
But that’s not all. The breezy item, headlined "Chowhounds", starts off by giving away the actual reason Marnon left the Governor’s Mansion:
"Remember the long-time executive chef who lost her job at the Mansion when Sarah decided to live mostly in Wasilla instead of Juneau?"
Marnon, in short, wasn’t fired to save money. She was fired because Governor Sarah Palin – whose executive credentials, displayed over an 18-month term, far out-strip Barack Obama’s accomplishments in some people's minds – spent most of her time as governor 567 bad-road miles away from the capital of Alaska.
The earlier article announcing Marnon’s firing also sheds light on Palin’s true devotion to her grueling, "ready at 3 A. M.", Presidential-like job:
"(Palin spokeswoman Meghan) Stapleton wouldn’t say exactly where Alaska’s first family is right now, citing security reasons. But the Palins will travel this summer, and spend time fishing, and plan to return to Juneau this fall."
Acting like Cheney even before her nomination as VP, Palin apparently had plenty of time while attending to the urgent business of serving Alaskans as their chief executive and commander in chief to see the Alaska countryside in stealthy comfort, even finding time to perhaps help her husband Todd set salmon traps.
Ironically, considering Palin's national base, it was conservatives in Alaska that were really incensed at Palin’s undercover travel itinerary.
This contemporary editorial blasts the ADN for reporting her disappearing act "without a whimper", claiming the paper routinely favored her over veteran politicians like Ted Stevens and Don Young.
Perhaps the paper was simply in awe of a woman able to reform Alaskan political culture so effectively, while spending so little time on such a daunting job.









Comments (19)
Not ttrying to take anything away from your "uncovering" that Ms. Palin worked mostly out of Anchorage, when the legislature wasn't in session, but your other point makes me wonder; How much time did Eliot Spitzer spend in his Manhatten office compared to Albany?
September 7, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obviously, I didn't spell that right, but I'm sure you get the idea.
September 7, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a reasonable point in principle, but the analogy doesn't work. Manhattan is five or six hours away from Albany by car, but it's also unquestionably the financial, informational, and intellectual capital of New York State, so spending time there is more likely to make the governor in touch with the needs of his constituents. There are also a lot of important people living in Manhattan who the governor can benefit from being in close contact with. Something tells me the same is probably not true for Wasilla.
September 7, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and Juneau is what, less than two hours by air? Plus, as I pointed out below, Anchorage is "unquestionably the financial, informational, and intellectual capital" of Alaska.
Palin is just their VP nominee and I think the campaign has the right idea, there's plenty of issues (flip-flopping on earmarks, censorship, international issues, abortion, creationism, etc.) that can effectively be used against her.
September 7, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
No idea, though I'm guessing Spitzer worked a whole lot harder wherever he was.
The GOP keeps insisting Sarah Palin, as governor of Alaska, has some kind of presidential-level executive experience. That she was only working part-time her 18 months in office annihilates that whole meme.
September 7, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's someone who posted a listing that identified all of her "jobs" (city council, mayor, oil & gas commissioner) as part-timesand of course, if you take into account the fact that she was accused of juicing her resume when they were thinking about ousting her from Mayor, the part-time angle might have some legs. Though, I'm sure the Illinois State Senate is also "part-time", as would be "community organizing" and I'm believe a US Senator's job would be as "full-time" as a governor, so it could also be a slippery slope.
Personally, I can't take from the fact that she lived mostly in suburban Anchorage as an indication that she was all that "part-time". Anchorage is centrally located; it's Alaska's largest city; it's where their television is based and more than half of the constituents would live within a day's drive.
Right now, I'm living in New Mexico and like a lot of western states, the legislature only meets for a month or two depending on the year and though he remains immensely popular, we all can probably surmise how much time Bill Richardson has devoted to state business over the past couple of years.
September 7, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
PS) Didn't Schwarzenegger also decide not to live in the mansion and instead, when the legislature's not in session, he's still living in Hollywood which is most of the state away?
(I don't know, but that what I can recall and it, combined with Eliot Spitzer could be considered precedent, if someone were to call her on the matter)
September 7, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think so. Also, here in Illinois the governor has moved his offices from Springfield (which is in the center of the state) to Chicago (the population, financial and cultural hub of the state).
September 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Anchorage was the state capital of Alaska, your argument might make sense. Plus, "traveling" (recreationally) and "fishing" (and watching Anchorage television)don't exactly qualify as governing.
The point here is the GOP and Palin herself are lying about her ridiculously inflated resume.
The White House is a full-time job. Someone used to taking summers off (and having someone else do the work the rest of the time) just might not be ready for the pressure.
September 7, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know. When I was in Jackson a few weeks ago, you could see Cheney's plane from the road. So for all we know, his house in Wyoming could've been the "undisclosed location".
And, though I've never lived in Alasks, I have to think that most business (state or otherwise) takes place in Anchorage and having ready access to most of the population, the television stations and all of the federal offices seems to be kind of important.
And, again, faulting a state official for only working part-time will only appeal to part of the electorate. I'm sure that a lot of people would wish their state governments would do the same, plus as I said, the "part-time" element could also backfire because I can't say that Obama or Biden has ever had a full-time job.
September 7, 2008 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW: Is the airport in Juneau even open year round?
I know that some of the villages in that part of the state are only accessible during the summer months, so though I don't like to defend her, it seems like summer may be the best time to visit with her constituents, anyhow.
September 7, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The links suggest Palin was hiding from her constituents, not visiting them. Her time away from Juneau wasn't a working vacation - this was time off, period. She's probably working harder now than she ever has in her life just to do fluff interviews.
The GOP wants people to think Palin was some kind of reforming arctic whirlwind. It ain't so - she only worked part time, if then, and mostly screwed up when she did have a decision to make, as I've documented elsewhere.
And I don't really think Cheney hangin' in Wyoming is a good counter-example of someone who might be "good under pressure".
September 7, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually Juneau is an island, decades old debate about moving it to the "mainland" because it is completely inaccessible by most of the population of Alaska.
I've lived in Alaska all my life and have never been there. I can't even recall school trips to visit the "State Capital".
Sarah forced some Legislative sessions in Anchorage for that exact reason - access to the public - specifically having to do with reworking the Oil Tax Rate that had been tainted by VECO and it's sycophants.
It's long been argued that the reason so much shenanigans goes on in Alaska politics is because the proverbial inmates, (Legislators) are left to run the asylum, (Juneau).
Not to mention the cost of flying legislators and their staff in and out of Juneau.
September 7, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if you are interested in community organizing as an alternative, you might like this:
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=2e0a7836-b897-4155-864c-25e791ff0f50
September 7, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
witty1 - thanks for your local insight and perspective
The Juneau vs "mainland" argument aside, from everything I've read Palin was AWOL more than usual. The LA Times today backs this up: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-palinstyle8-2008sep08,0,855616.story, and does this story from the Juneau Empire:http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/083108/sta_325768173.shtml.
September 8, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Though, again, I hate to defend her, but it seems like that's been part of my role lately... But, perhaps she wasn't as participatory in the rebate discussions because it wasn't her proposal.
According to the Anchorage paper, she had proposed giving everyone a $100 a month, targeted toward energy expenditures and she wanted to subsidize electrical rates. I don't know what happened to her plan to reduce utility costs by 60%, but the $1200 per person of untargeted money is in line with her $100 a month and it's being distributed on here timetable.
September 8, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting about the chef. Because I read that
Sarah, when she flew to Wasilla at state expense, in order to tell graduates of her church's ministry program that should pray for the pipeline, which is God's will, claimed both travel expenses and meal expenses for that trip.
If the family was cooking the meals, why did she claim $120 for a few meals in her own home?
And she claims to have saved money on a cook!
September 8, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
As we now know thanks to reports like this http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26616212
Sarah wasn't just a stay-at-home governor: Alaska paid her to do it.
They paid her to stay away...maybe they knew what they were doing...
September 9, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin did not say she fired her chef. Democrats like to lie about what people said so that they can accuse them of being liars. Here is the quote from the speech:
"That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.
I also drive myself to work.
And I thought we could muddle through without the governor's personal chef - although I've got to admit that sometimes my kids sure miss her."
It is absolutely true that she no longer has a personal chef, just like she said.
September 9, 2008 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment