« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Dancing After the Towers Fell
We must sometimes discuss the horrific, and I find that there was, during the final night of the Republican National Convention a moment so horrific that it bears discussion.
For those who missed it, for it aired well before prime time, the RNC chose to show graphic footage of 9/11/01 - the tower being struck, people jumping to their deaths, the towers falling. Immediately after this tragic footage aired, they had a short break while "Highway to the Danger Zone" was played.
I am serious - this was no tragic parody taken too far. This was real. And chilling. And filled with hate.
Many Republicans chose to dance to it. These few minutes were permanently etched into my mind as an example of why we must all fight to our last breaths to make sure these wretches never regain political office.
This, truly, must be the final act of a pitiful, ghoulish people without ideas or a soul - to resort to the basest in our natures rather than the best part of our spirits. I am dispirited and ashamed for these low men, these hollow men; ashamed *for* them because they have no shame themselves. Whatever evil urges inspired this senseless display of national tragedy and pain, I can probably never understand. I don't want to understand it. I want to seek to forgive them for it.
I do not know if there is a forgiving God, an angry God, or a vacant nothingness between the stars, but I do know that morality surpasses creed. Is this act a forgivable act? Few seem to be discussing it, and it sorely bears discussion, for whoever approved such a desperate political tactic is unfit for leading a moral, righteous people: unfit because they do not share the basic values of their nation. Unfit, also, because to exalt this tragedy is to be the opposite of a patriot, for it dishonors the memories and ashes our honored dead. To exalt it for nothing more than political gain is unthinkable by a moral people.
It has been said that evil men can think of things that good men cannot. McCain has said he knows "the good and evil" in the world. Well, his party has certainly shown a passion for evil. If there is decency and goodness at all in his party, airing this footage has called it to question.
That his party can dance immediately after seeing such footage...well, that says more about them than anything I could write.
May God take pity on their souls.





Comments (131)
This is a masterful and eloquent post. I urge everyone to recommend it.
This post deserves to rise to the top of the recommend list. It deserves a wide readership. Send it to your email list. Copy it to blogs.
Chris, you have written from the heart. My words here cannot match your eloquence. But I commend you for raising these issues in the manner you have. Yours is a large and beautiful soul. Hang onto your morality and your ideals. And never let go.
September 5, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't say anything other than thank you for writing this.
September 5, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel as you do. I asked my conservative brother if he was troubled by McCain's selection of Palin given her lack of experience and his age. My brother is 75 and he told me that he's concerned about McCain's capabilities. Without missing a beat, he said no, that if anything happened to McCain, the "team" would help her govern. Yeah, he's right. The same team that's running the country right now. Evidently that's fine and dandy with my brother.
September 5, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is bush in drag. Someone who can be a "front" person - a vote getter - for a dark Lord like Cheney. Scares the heck out of me!
September 5, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I think Palin is CHEYNEY in drag. Seriously. A lot more dangerous than Bush if we are so foolish as to let her get near the seat of power.
September 5, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is very similar to Bush, as a matter of fact you can take the Palin or Bush? quiz here:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/09/05/palin_bush_quiz/index.html
But I think Bush wasn't afraid to answer questions from the press.
September 6, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
So sad that this wing still exists in the GOP. People who can't really see the damage that has been done these last 40 years by both parties, but especially by the neoconservative-dominated republican party.
At 75 years old, I would think your brother had a longer view of the GOP that might be able to break free of his brainwashing. Just goes to show how powerful that program has been.
September 6, 2008 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chris: Thanks for this post. I don't think the Republicans understand that they have squeezed the blood out of 9/11 and that everyone, regardless of party, feels that pain and still does. But it can't define us. Your perspective is touching and raw. Thanks.
September 5, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
You might want to post that other link here, KateO, for anyone who missed the "dancing."
I think the first night the crowd was so dull and moribund that they told people to liven things up. Disastrous!
September 5, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, here's the lighter side of the RNC getting down.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/09/who-says-white-people-cant-dance.html
September 5, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, I think your link, KateO, gives the total context for this post. We've all seen the towers fall - but if people see for themselves the way the people were dancing - and that they did that no matter what the topic was.... well, this post says it all.
September 5, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forgive me, KateO - what you've linked to is the "context" for this post.
September 5, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
So sorry, did you mean link to this:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/the-truth-about-cedarburg-wi.php
September 5, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
No.... I meant exactly what you linked to at first.
My "forgive me" was an accident as I didn't know the initial comment had posted!
So now I apologize for the confusion.
I do indeed think the Vanity Fair video is the perfect way for people to "see" the actual kind of dancing people were doing. Thus, it is indeed the context for this post.
My sincere apologies for the confusion.
September 5, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is without doubt the most moving post I have read since coming to TPM and the most chillingly insightful.
Poetic, vivid, sorrowing, angry. I can't praise this piece of writing enough.
Deserves to be on the op-eds of the NYT, WaPo, LAT, etc.
Thank you so much.
TPM STAFF: please see to it that this post gets a wider readership if you can. Thanks.
September 5, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel the same way. I read it aloud to my husband. It brings tears to your eyes.
September 5, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Humbly Rec'd. I know I can't make generalizations here, but there is something primitive about the minds of too many Republicans, something that lusts for blood, even the sight of America's own.
God forgive them indeed. Thanks for this piece. It's part of me now.
September 5, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Off topic, but you MUST see the Daily Show's mock bio of McCain that aired tonight. Really brilliant.
September 5, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you.Rec'd
September 5, 2008 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd
September 5, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
A noble post. The 'Bush Base' is a totally immoral bunch of chest thumping hypocrites who cannot run their own lives in an honorable way but think they have the right to tell everyone else how to live.
They would dance to the falling towers like some cult of witches from ages past, yet not allow cameras at the funerals of troops that Bush sent to needless deaths in a foreign land.
September 6, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
A noble post. The 'Bush Base' is a totally immoral bunch of chest thumping hypocrites who cannot run their own lives in an honorable way but think they have the right to tell everyone else how to live.
They would dance to the falling towers like some cult of witches from ages past, yet not allow cameras at the funerals of troops that Bush sent to needless deaths in a foreign land.
September 6, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
A noble post. The 'Bush Base' is a totally immoral bunch of chest thumping hypocrites who cannot run their own lives in an honorable way but think they have the right to tell everyone else how to live.
They would dance to the falling towers like some cult of witches from ages past, yet not allow cameras at the funerals of troops that Bush sent to needless deaths in a foreign land.
September 6, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
A noble post. The 'Bush Base' is a totally immoral bunch of chest thumping hypocrites who cannot run their own lives in an honorable way but think they have the right to tell everyone else how to live.
They would dance to the falling towers like some cult of witches from ages past, yet not allow cameras at the funerals of troops that Bush sent to needless deaths in a foreign land.
September 6, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
And yet these same ghoulish hypocrites refuse to show the coffins of the soldiers returning from the war. They will show the atrocities of death and destruction from 9/11, but not the atrocities of their own war of choice, both on our own soldiers and on the people of Iraq.
There are really no words that adequately describe how depraved, dangerous and soulless these people are, but you did a very good job approximating it, Chris.
September 6, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Berry: This, truly, must be the final act of a pitiful, ghoulish people without ideas or a soul
It is most certainly not their final act. Our country becomes more and more full of these vampires every day.
Berry: I do not know if there is a forgiving God, an angry God, or a vacant nothingness between the stars
These are not the only possibilities.
September 6, 2008 6:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Providing we all put Barack in the White House come November, this may be the last time such a spectacle takes place at a GOP event. All heart and soul hasn't left the conservative movement in this country.
Coke Classic is coming soon to store near you. Sorry for New Coke, but it's one of those things that look great on paper and don't translate to the real world.
Just the idiots who smashed the windows of small business owners at the WTO riots in Seattle don't represent all liberals, this dying ideology is hardly representative of the GOP as a whole, its rank and file members or its history of good works in this country.
Please remember that even as you witness the well-financed and nationally-televised funeral of the coup that took control of this country 40 years ago, that this represents only a very small part of those in this country who identify themselves as conservative. What you are witnessing is the beginning of the end for the neoconservatives.
If you all push too hard on the left, the pendulum will go right past that sweet spot in the center we have been hunting for and which Barack Obama staked his campaign on.
September 6, 2008 8:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just the idiots who smashed the windows of small business owners at the WTO riots in Seattle don't represent all liberals...
There you go again, furthering your party's propaganda point that conflates liberalism with violence. It's totally illegitimate, but so effective that we can't really blame you for keeping it rolling.
As for your assertion that "this dying ideology is hardly representative of the GOP as a whole, its rank and file members," this is demonstrably false. According to Quinnipiac, northward of 80% of Republicans in battleground states will vote for the extremist McCain/Palin ticket that your party is attempting to thrust on the American people. Can you think of any reason to believe that the saturation will be any lower in other states?
You say, "What you are witnessing is the beginning of the end for the neoconservatives." Does this mean that you do not see the nominees of your party as neocons? If so, would you mind pointing out the difference between their platform and the current neocon administration? I must confess I can't find much in the way of divergence between your party's proposals and the policies of the Bush Administration.
September 6, 2008 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
There you go again not reading what you quoted. I said the Raging Left DOESN'T represent liberals anymore than neoconservatives & the Rapture Right represent all conservatives.
Apparently you don't read anything I write or can't recall from one blog to the next who I support and why. I said in this very post that Barack Obama is going to raise the bar all around and would be changing the paradigm not just for democrats but for republicans as well. That is why the GOP is changing and why the DLC has lost power in the democratic party.
You must have bought into the democratic party propaganda that they haven't been every bit a part of the problem as the neocons have been these last forty years. I bet you Ted Kennedy is sorry he challenged Carter for the nomination, ushering in the Reagan Revolution. I bet Bill Clinton wished he hadn't folded like a cheap suit every time Newt Gingrich said Boo!
No one is innocent what has happened here and calling people brainwashed robots because you can't comprehend what is written doesn't advance the "liberal" cause any.
To paraphrase a maxim from carpentry: Read twice, comment once.
September 6, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see, you want to complain about me, rather than my points. Tell you what. I'll just stick to a logical argument and you go ahead and keep being unresponsive.
JEM: I said the Raging Left DOESN'T represent liberals
And AGAIN you claim that the WTO violence came from liberals (to whom you refer so propaganistically as The Raging Left). Documentation? None, not even to answer a refutation. Dishonesty? Plenty, as we have come to expect from spokespersons from your party.
JEM: ...anymore than neoconservatives & the Rapture Right represent all conservatives.
Now you misquote yourself. Another Republican tactic. In your original statement, it was "the GOP," not conservatives, that the neocons don't represent. As I pointed out, that's a lie.
JEM: Apparently you don't read anything I write
Here I go again, wishing this were so.
JEM: or can't recall from one blog to the next who I support and why.
I am well aware of whom you support. You support the Obama ticket. I am also well aware of why. He is a conservative.
JEM: Barack Obama is going to raise the bar all around and would be changing the paradigm not just for democrats but for republicans as well.
More unsupported opinion and unwarranted crystal ball gazing.
JEM: That is why the GOP is changing and why the DLC has lost power in the democratic party.
This follows from your previous statement like watermelons follow an enema. As I have pointed out, the your party is NOT changing (except that it keeps getting smaller). Whether or not this is an enduring trend remains to be seen, but its platform, as I have also pointed out unchallenged by you, is just as militaristic, just as oligarchical, just as inhuman as ever. That's YOUR platform. Proud, are you?
JEM: You must have bought into the democratic party propaganda that they haven't been every bit a part of the problem as the neocons have been these last forty years. I bet you Ted Kennedy is sorry he challenged Carter for the nomination, ushering in the Reagan Revolution. I bet Bill Clinton wished he hadn't folded like a cheap suit every time Newt Gingrich said Boo!
No one is innocent what has happened here and calling people brainwashed robots because you can't comprehend what is written doesn't advance the "liberal" cause any.
I have no idea where any of this comes from nor what it has to do with the rest of our conversation.
To paraphrase a maxim from carpentry: Read twice, comment once.
To paraphrase another, horsefeathers.
September 6, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are obviously incapable of rational thought and rational conversation. You don't represent your party very well. Good luck with those tactics, bold words and all.
September 6, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: You are obviously incapable of rational thought and rational conversation. You don't represent your party very well. Good luck with those tactics, bold words and all.
I must indeed be incapable of rational thought as you so ably demonstrated. You carefully demolished every single point that I raised with thoughtful analysis (battleground states are inconsequential), authoritative links (????), and inarguable facts (a 50-state victory in 2012).
Another bit of evidence of my psychosis: I was foolish enough to get into a debate with such a well-informed, clear-thinking, and insightful Republican. How could I have ever expected to win an argument with such an invincible opponent. I bow to your wisdom.
September 6, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn! I've totally been enjoying this hoonoo! Very tasty little smackdown!
September 6, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, total smack down. He debates shit just like you do. Pull quotes out of context and then say it is unsupported by the "facts" without providing any actual counter "facts" as a rebuttal. Great technique! No wonder you are fan.
September 6, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: He debates shit just like you do. Pull quotes out of context
Example, please.
September 6, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: You don't represent your party very well.
And which party would that be, Jason? Remember, when you assume, you make an ass out of Uma Thurman.
September 6, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "liberal" party. Whatever it is you stand for, is completely lost in your sophomoric generalizations and complete inability to see beyond your own narrow view. In other words, a lack of empathy. Ironic in a liberal.
September 6, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
PS: Who was it demonstrating in Seattle? The Rapture Right care about economic issues and globalization now? Are the Rich Motherfucker crowd from the GOP protesting the WTO? Your arguments make no more sense than the clowns on Raging Right.
September 6, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who was it demonstrating in Seattle?
Asked and answered, Counselor. Really, I don't expect you to read twice as some do, but once would be nice.
September 6, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, you are answering with more bullshit from a liberal point of view. That isn't the basis of my argument.
I am not saying they represent the "liberal" POV, just that for many on the other side of the fence - read, republicans- that is exactly what they are, crazy liberals out to take their revenge.
When you characterize "all registered republicans" as being for the neocon agenda, you are showing that you are just another dumb ass liberal who doesn't do his research.
Not saying it is true, just that it appears as if it may be true.
September 6, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see.
September 6, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
COMPREHENSION 101
When Raging Left and Rapture Right are used as pejoratives in the same comment, it is meant to show that NEITHER GROUP represents their side, just that they are the loudest and most passionate.
That was the entire basis of my original comment to this blog as well that you took so much offense to. You sure get offended easily for the party that is on the rise. Confidence would be a lot more attractive to those "swing voters" in the middle.
You have yet to offer a rational counter argument to my main point. I am not looking for links to sources. I am not looking for in-depth studies. I am looking for an intelligent opinion based on common sense.
If you can't see the face of the electorate changing and rely on CNN for your political analysis, that would explain your complete inability to see the progressive republicans within your midst who just might help Obama increase that margin.
The loudest on both sides don't represent the vast, sane center of the country. When you all get together and start pitching republicans on the bonfire, you work at cross purposes to your stated goals.
September 6, 2008 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
You have yet to offer a rational counter argument to my main point.
I'm afraid you managed to conceal your "main point" far too well for me to offer any sort of argument. For all I know, I agree with your main point, whatever it might have been.
I was responding to your accusation that the WTO protesters were lefties, and your rather perplexing suggestion that the 80+ percent of registered members of your party don't represent your party. Perhaps I wasn't clear about that.
But let's give your battered ego a break and talk for a moment about what you call "common sense." It's way overrated, you know. A lot of very bright people have come a cropper due to improper application of common sense. Common sense told the early popes that the sun moved across the sky while the earth stood still. It told Aristotle that a heavier object would fall faster than a lighter one. It told Jefferson that black Africans and white Englishmen could never live in harmony together. It told Einstein that quantum physics was bunkum. If common sense can lead these intellectuals to embarrasment, imagine what it can do to such dim bulbs as we. Rely on common sense at your peril, Jason. It is far wiser to base your philosophy in empiricism.
September 6, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
"80%+ don't represent your party."
What did I say at the very beginning?
Barack is getting about 20% to 25% of the republican vote at this moment in time based on open primaries. That would leave about 80& to 75% remaining in the GOP to be turned to a progressive agenda. Of those, perhaps half are reachable and half won't change this year, if ever.
Barack could have even more republican votes by the general if you guys could back off and quit demonizing everyone who isn't a registered democrat.
September 7, 2008 8:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Barack could have even more republican votes by the general if you guys could back off and quit demonizing everyone who isn't a registered democrat.
Another unsupported statement of wishful thinking expressed as fact. We can't blame you personally, though. It's your party's way of doing business.
BTW, would you feel better if I also "demonize" some registered Democrats? I'll be more than happy to dig into the myriad flaws in the conservative positions the Democrats have espoused.
But help me out here. I can't figure out what I have said that demonizes anyone. Can you point out one bitty little demonization that I've done? Thanks.
September 7, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
You conflate Conservative with Neoconservative. It is the same logical fallacy you idiots make when you confuse Evangelical and Fundamentalist.
You keep saying "my party" this and that. n case you missed it, I am not voting for my party until they start fielding progressive candidates. "My party" has been taken over by fascists and fools. Just like the democratic party has been.
Are you this thick-witted in person or is it just all the words that get confusing and hard to remember over the course of a long thread? Every comment you make demonizes "republicans" and the "80% of us who support the neocon agenda" and are out to Destroy the World!Seriously dude/dudette this is just getting boring. I am off to write a blog about this idiocy now.
September 7, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every comment you make demonizes "republicans" and the "80% of us who support the neocon agenda" and are out to Destroy the World!
Then it should be no problem at all for you to show where I have done so. Now remember, simply making you look foolish is not the same as demonizing. Come to think of it, I'm not even doing that. There is no need for me to do so.
Boring? I suppose it is boring to keep spouting unsupported speculations and inappropriate characterizations. If it were me, I'd stop. But I'm not going to insist on your changing your style.
September 7, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have quoted you more than once where you accused "80% of registered republicans" as being part and parcel of the neocon agenda for America. I then explained that at least for every republcuian I know, that simply isn't true.
You make claims that are not backed up by allegorical or statistical evidence based on sound science and not biased polling.
You have ignored my answers to your claims more than once. Yes, boring and pedantic and predictable. Anyone with half a brain who is reading this exchange knows exactly what I am saying and none of it is unsubstantiated.
September 7, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: have quoted you more than once where you accused "80% of registered republicans" as being part and parcel of the neocon agenda for America.
Now I understand the problem. You have adopted the attitude of your party which dictates that if you tell a lie often enough it becomes true. It hasn't worked for you so far. You are still lying. If it does become true, I'll let you know, but I'm afraid you will remain a liar for some time. Sorry.
September 7, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every time I attempt to reply to you, the comment seems to vanish in the abyss that is TPM Cafe's interface. It's almost as frustrating as you are.
But what a lot of undocumented, opinionated, ill-conceived conservative propaganda you offer in such a compact, compacted turd of a post.
You say, "Just [as] the idiots who smashed the windows of small business owners at the WTO riots in Seattle don't represent all liberals..." [emphasis added]
Here you go again. This is the second time in the last few days that you have tried to further your party's line that conflates liberalism with violence and stupidity. Have you no shame? The people to whom you refer do not represent ANY liberals. They represent anti-free-traders, a group whose membership spans parties and ideologies and I daresay is more heavily represented by those to whom you refer to as "the middle" and to whom a liberal would refer as right-wingers.
You say, "this dying ideology is hardly representative of the GOP as a whole, its rank and file members..."
This is nonsense and I would be startled to learn that you don't know it. Those who are registered Republicans are fully committed to the neoconservative ideology. According to Quinnipiac, members of your party in four battleground states favor the extremist McCain/Palin ticket in majorities that exceed eighty percent. I have no reason to believe that the fanatic loyalty of the vast majority of your party's members would be lower elsewhere. Do you?
You say, "What you are witnessing is the beginning of the end for the neoconservatives."
I beg your pardon? What is it about your party's nominees that separates them from the neocons? Have you read your own party's platform? Can you provide just one or two examples where it diverges from the policies advanced by the Bush/Cheney administration?
You say, "If you all push too hard on the left, the pendulum will go right past that sweet spot in the center." You call it a sweet spot. I call it a rotten spot, and wish that Americans had the sense to recognize it for what it is and excise it. The pendulum in the United States is so far to the right that liberals must push as hard as we can just to slow its progress even further to the right.
September 6, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This comment is even worse than the first one. Don't point to "Battleground" states as being an indicator of anything. Much less polls. The entire electoral map is shifting because of Barack Obama and you're so angry at "republicans" that you lose all common sense.
What is starting with 20& to 25% of the republican party voting democratic this year will be a 50-State victory come 2012.
If you honestly think this country would work any better under one-party rule by liberals then you haven't been paying attention. Extremism on either side is what wrecks this country and keeps us bouncing from terrible strategy to the next, only at opposite ends of the spectrum. Don't you think like is a little more complex than that? Don't you realize this country has been having the same argument for over 230 years?
You have a one-dimensional view of a three dimensional problem and offer zero common sense solutions to how we can focus both parties to pursue common goals with complimentary, though opposing, methods.
"Pushing as hard as we possibly can to stop further drifting to the right" is reactionary tactic not based on a realistic view of the trends shown in the primary. All pushing does right now is push people away you are trying to get to join you in fixing the country under President Obama.
I am pretty sure he wouldn't approve of your methods or rhetoric. He is all about healing the country, not dividing it further.
September 6, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: Don't point to "Battleground" states as being an indicator of anything.
OK, let's hear your common sense interpretation of how the battleground states won't determine the winner of November's presidential election. Should be entertaining.
JEM: What is starting with 20& to 25% of the republican party voting democratic this year will be a 50-State victory come 2012.
And you base this outrageous prediction on what? Common sense, I presume?
JEM: If you honestly think this country would work any better under one-party rule by liberals then you haven't been paying attention.
If you honestly think I said anything even remotely resembling this, it's not I who hasn't been paying attention.
JEM: Extremism on either side is what wrecks this country and keeps us bouncing from terrible strategy to the next, only at opposite ends of the spectrum.
Agreed. And your party is the least extreme party in the United States, right?
You have a one-dimensional view of a three dimensional problem and offer zero common sense solutions
This thread is not about solutions, but really...A Republican complaining about a lack of solutions? That takes a certain amount of chutzpah. If you really want to see a dearth of solutions, read your party's platform.
September 6, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I base on the early open primaries where Barack won with 75% of the vote, including a healthy percentage of republicans. I base it on the fact that every republican I know is voting for him, not a few of which are on this site.
There are no battleground states in a 50-state strategy. Barack has already won this thing, the only question is by what margin. Palin shored up the Rapture Right and that's about it. They may have avoided a blowout, but Obama will be the next president.
Being an asshole doesn't make you right. Confusing republicans who are trying to remake their party with the clowns you saw on television is just stupid. Biting off your nose to spite your face is no more attractive on the left than it is on the right.
Read any of my blogs. I have plenty of solutions to offer. You have nothing but spite and criticism and a very ugly tone of voice based on an incomplete or illogical reading of what I wrote on this particular thread.
You blamed "republicans" for all that was wrong in this country. Sounded like you are more than happy to use the same tactics you most certainly spoke out against these last 8 years.
Brilliant!
September 6, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: You blamed "republicans" for all that was wrong in this country.
And I'm sure you have a link to the place where I did that, but with this damn interface it just didn't register. Would you mind re-posting it?
September 6, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am registered republican and I do not. Every single registered republican I know supports Barack. I am guessing you don't know any republicans or you would know that your one-dimensional view of conservatives is wrong.
Perhaps you should read what you write before you hit send. Read twice, comment once.
September 6, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are right, because not all but only the vast majority of you registered Republicans support the radical neoconservative agenda represented by the Bush/Cheney/McCain/Palin axis.
You are right, because not all but only 80-plus percent of you registered Republicans support candidates who want 100 years of occupation in Iraq, who predict "more wars," who treat women's reproductive equipment as the property of men, who want anti-science and religion shoved down the throats of our children.
You are right because you caught me in an overstatement. I said all of you when I should have said almost all of you.
Congratulations on another stunning victory both for yourself and for your definition of common sense.
September 6, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You keep saying 80% support the "neocon agenda of 100 more years of war" and yet provide not a single source for that outrageous statement.
I suppose we can say 80% of the democratic party supported Bill Clinton as aw-shucked our way toward an even deeper control of this country by the corporate masters who are really pulling the strings. You re-elected the guy, so he must have had the support of ALL democrats to create the Prison Industrial Complex and ramp up the War on Drugs and the War on Poor People?
Oh, wait, Bill Clinton didn't represent the progressive wing of the part, maybe 20% at that time, and it is only now that progressive democrats are getting some traction after 8 years of Bush's craziness.
Can't you see or smell the hypocrisy of your position?
September 7, 2008 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: You keep saying 80% support the "neocon agenda of 100 more years of war" and yet provide not a single source for that outrageous statement.
No I didn't say that. What I said was that MORE THAN 80 percent support the CANDIDATES who espouse another 100 years of OCCUPATION in Iraq. Significant difference, but perhaps too subtle for you. Or perhaps you are once again not following your own advice to read what you're responding to. I can't tell which.
And yes I did document the 80 percent number. The fact that you didn't read it doesn't mean it isn't there. Read, Jason. Click on links. You can do that even if you don't use them yourself.
JEM: I suppose we can say 80% of the democratic party supported Bill Clinton as aw-shucked our way toward an even deeper control of this country by the corporate masters who are really pulling the strings. You re-elected the guy, so he must have had the support of ALL democrats to create the Prison Industrial Complex and ramp up the War on Drugs and the War on Poor People?
I re-elected the guy? Really? How did I do that? Uma, Jason. Uma Thurman. Remember? And by the way, does this indicate that you voted for Bush 41 and Bob "Bob Dole" Dole? And now you're pretending that you just became a Republican? Or maybe you hadn't achieved your majority in time to vote for those giants of intellect? I don't want to make false assumptions. See, when you assume, it makes -- never mind, I already explained this.
JEM: Can't you see or smell the hypocrisy of your position?
Irony, thy name is Jason. But no, Jason, I can't. In fact, I can't even make sense of most of your arguments. This is undoubtedly because I am incapable of incapable of rational thought. Your erudite discourse is simply well over my head.
September 7, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
See my statement up above. You said 80% support the neocon agenda. That is a quote. You are wrong. 80% of registered republicans don't even vote, moron. Anymore than 870% of democrats vote. T he FRINGES dictate policy.
That is the problem with this country. Perhaps you should sacrifice "nuance" because you don't do ti very well. It gets lost in the depth of ignorance you display about the other half of this country that you obviously know nothing about, no matter how they choose to register to vote.
You make the mother of all assumptions about when I registered republican. I was registered democrat until Bill Clinton became the disgrace he became. The DLC forced me into being an independent until I realized that you need to man up and choose sides in a two-party system until it can be fixed.
"Liberals" such as you and Loki made me register republican for the first time in my life last month. So I could be one of a handful of DC republicans out here trying to change the party from within.
What have you been doing to change things on your side of the fence? When have you stopped being a self-indulgent tool who loses Obama as many votes as he gains?
September 7, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
You said 80% support the neocon agenda. That is a quote.
I'm sorry, but that is a lie.
September 7, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Polls are the lazy-person's way to debate politics. Doesn't require thought. Just regurgitate a statistic and all is right with your world. Well, the numbers don't quite work in your favor this time because the electorate is changing. Not a single one of your prejudiced opinions are actually based in fact or observation.
They are based on a one-inch understanding of a mile-deep America. The same thing you have been accusing neocons of all these years.
Now that is real irony.
September 7, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: A quote with unsubstantiated opinion besides.
Finally some documentation! Of course, you are documenting your lie, but at least you have provided documentation of the fact that it is a lie. That's progress for a Republican.
September 7, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right, because you don't say in the quote above that 80% or more registered republicans condone the neocon agenda.
That is a flat out falsehood group in America even has a 50 or 60% turnout, let alone 80%. Then, of those that have turned out this year, a large chunk voted Obama in open primaries.
The only one documenting their inability to think rationally around here is you.
September 7, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really, Jason. It's bad enough when you repeat your lies over and over again, and even do so immediately after you have demonstrated to all of us that they are lies.
Must you also demonize your debating opponent repeatedly? I've already agreed that I am devoid of rationality as you define it. Why must you continue to pound home a point you have already won when there are so many that you have clearly lost? Bad debating tactics. But then you Republicans always get beat down in debates, don't you?
September 7, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Being an asshole doesn't make you right.
No, but it seems to work for some who post here.
September 6, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah... the New Deal and Great Society totally sucked, man!
September 6, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only reason that passed is because Republicans supported FDR, both voters and politicians. it wasn't one party rule by any stretch.
September 6, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of this would have occurred without the Democratic President and the Democratically controlled congress. The people of the country were supportive of Roosevelt and the Democrats and some Republicans were smart enough to see that. Good for them... very politically astute of some of them.
Nevertheless, without FDR and a Democratically controlled congress... it never would have happened.
September 6, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can't compare the parties the same way from 1932 to today.
The differences weren't as stark, either between the policies or the people. Same with the post war period that was so full of peace and prosperity.
It has been a long time since the parties worked together to get things done. You act as though the democratic party started with FDR and the GOP began with Reagan.
September 6, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pivot and run. Pivot and run.
September 6, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is a great rebuttal of my point. You have something to offer besides lame one-liners?
PS: FDR, his presidency and post-Depression America is a lot more complex than a Wikipedia can manage to impart.
September 7, 2008 8:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did you really compare those anarchist nitwits who seem to make a living of throwing bricks through Starbucks' plate glass windows, with the "dying ideology" of Neoconservatism? You mean to compare the fringe elements of professional protesters, who have never done anything in their lives, never been a part of the Democratic Party, never held public office much less been able to push any political party towards their ideology, you compared them with the ruling ideological leaders of the actual Republican Party?
Those "idiots" in Seattle are cyphers. The Neocons of the Republican Party are in the Party! Running it! Making policy (or attempting to) daily.
Splendid comparison.
September 6, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I am speaking to what" conservatives" view as liberals, not who the actual liberals are. This whole argument is about each side not truly understanding the other side in total, rather than letting the fringes dictate the response.
September 6, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw the Towers fall and I have never since speculated whether the folks who were trapped and killed and the folks who mourned then and mourn now were Republicans and Democrats. I don't believe that Democrats have a monopoly on virtue or are better mourners than Republicans.
I hated when George Bush et al used 9/11 for political advantage. I will never forgive Rudy Giuliani for using the tragedy for political gain and, in particular, his outrageous statement that he thought to himself, "Thank G-d George Bush is President" as he watched what was happening. But I'm not going to play the same fucking game, which is what this post does.
Next week, like a good human being, and not like a good Republican or Democrat, I'll remember to walk past the firehouse on 66th and Amsterdam, my home station, and look at the plaques of the kids who died that day doing their jobs. And I won't give a damn whether they were Republicans or Democrats.
Most highly rated post? This post is an example of what is wrong with this country. We can't even accept the things that we should share as a people anymore. We have to make the Republican guy down the street into a monster. Bullshit. I won't play this nonsensical, hateful game, complete with using G-d as a prop.
September 6, 2008 8:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bruce, you rock. By FAR the most reasonable and common sense voice on TPM with regards to these matters.
You should join me in changing the GOP from the inside out.
Doesn't matter what you call yourself, it matters who you are. As long as we vote a straight progressive ticket in the general, we can push for more centrist candidates in the primary without sacrificing the forward momentum we have on the democratic side.
I am afraid of what this country would look like with a neoliberal version of the neocon nightmare we are just waking up from now.
We can't handle these extreme shifts in ideology anymore.
September 6, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
And furthermore, if you want to show that Republicans were dancing over 9/11, give us the tape. Otherwise, objection, hearsay, argumentative, and ultimately without the foundation that such a scurrilous indictment requires. Plenty of shame and disgust to spread around here. This post will stick with me, but not for the reasons described above by the star-struck commenters.
Imagine, Democrats using 9/11 just like the lowest of the Republican scum did for years. Never in my wildest imagination would I have anticpated that.
September 6, 2008 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2RqUZEY2ic
September 6, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's dancing after the tape, not OVER the tape as requested. If you can't get it right don't try to do it at all.
This is right up there with the rooster thinking he's responsible for the sun coming up. Because one follows the other, one cannot assume one CAUSED to other.
And that pretty much leaves you as a user of tragedy for your own pathetic little purposes.
September 6, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
The original blogger wrote:
"Immediately after this tragic footage aired, they had a short break while "Highway to the Danger Zone" was played."
This is the tape of the dancing to the Top Gun theme immediately after the 9/11 video ran. No one said the music was played over the tape, dumbass. The point is, it seems insensitive and insulting to play the Top Gun theme to work up the crowd into a dance fever IMMEDIATELY after the 9/11 footage. No one is saying that one caused the other. Thou doth protesteth too much.
September 6, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was dancing AFTER the tape not OVER the tape as requested.
This is just like the rooster claiming credit for making the sun rise. Just because the one thing happens after another does not prove the one thing caused it.
Which leaves you as a user of tragedy for your own pathetic little purposes.
September 6, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bruce...
He did not say or even suggest that anyone was "dancing over 9/11." He said that they danced in the convention to a song called "Highway to the Danger Zone" which he also clearly says played shortly after the showing of the towers falling.
If nothing else that shows extremely bad taste.
September 6, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree Bslev. Strongly. This post is deservedly at the top because it points to something detestable in the Republican Party, not the republican voters.
You say it is demonizing the voters, the neighbors of you and I who vote the republican ticket.
That was your rhetorical turn, and yes, if we accept that is the thrust of the post you are right.
I don't read it your way, I read the post as an uncovering of the basic hypocricy of the Republican Party, the ruling culture that has for decades manipulated its base for its own hypocritical ends using nativism and patriotism and fear and greed as its powerful marketing tools.
You tried to make us see this post as base because it demonizes almost half the population that Barack is trying to reach out to.
I see it as exposing the false-front of concern that the Republican party uses to keep that same population in their thrall.
It deserves its place at the top of the list.
September 6, 2008 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bravo! Beautiful comment!
September 6, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yet, two of us from opposite sides of the spectrum and are hardly politically naive had the same "mistaken" impression of the post?
The problem most "liberals" don't seem to understand is that bad mouthing those republicans are the same as bad mouthing all republicans. The same way democrats took criticism of Bill Clinton and the DLC personally, when it was aimed solely at the "leadership" of the democratic party. "Liberals" are as diverse and as dynamic as "conservatives" but you don't like it when the brand is attacked either.
Basic herd psychology. Root for the home team.
We want to continue to bring moderate republicans over to a progressive mindset. It requires. No. It demands that the "liberals" quit taking such great satisfaction in demonizing the republicans and making allusions to some grand evil. It makes "liberals" look unhinged, uncharitable and uninformed. It also forces "republicans" to circle the wagons against the perceived attacks.
Come on. This is just common sense information to not belittle the other side if you want to get a portion of their votes. We MUST have those votes for a governing majority. Democrats can't afford to burn "republicans" at the stake this year and have anything but a Pyhrric victory and a divided country incapable of getting anything done.
I am pretty sure that isn't your goal or Barack's.
September 6, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hello Jason,
I have the highest respect for your calm and reasoned voice. It makes mine, in comparison, often seem shrill and demagogic.
And I support your quest to change from within your party. If the progressives which I am a member of, ever want to play in national politics and make an impact we will have the same task in front of us with the Democratic Party.
Your faction and mine have our work cut out for us.
This last comment you made, which this reply should post beneath, finally opened my eyes to your intention.
I have been arguing that bellicosity toward Iran or Russia, only weakened the moderates in each country and strengthened the extremists. That reasoning is essentially what you are deploying in the case of Republicans and Democrats. Democratic bellicosity provokes Republican reaction and intransigence.
On the part of the voters yes. I think you are right.
On the part of the leadership no. They pursue fixed aims and it matters nothing to them if the opposing party be placatory or hostile. They will assert what power they can by the most effective means open to them.
But assuming there is still a linkage between voters and representatives in the Republican party, a large assumption, since the linkage in the Democratic Party seems to have failed, then you may be right. If we stop demonizing their party, their hostility to us may drop. And I think Barack wants to play it that way.
I am old and bitter toward the RNC and my comments below accurately reflect my own feelings: the path of two armed camps, two cultures, two visions of the good since I have not seen since Reagan ANY attempt on their part to bridge the divide: only a patient year-after-year effort to deepen the chasm, to demonize US, to annihilate us as a viable party, to impose effective one-party rule, to subvert the Laws of our nation and to bankrupt and disable its government. How can I, Jason, compromise with that?
September 6, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are one of the most reasoned and rational voices on TPM. I would hardly consider you shrill by any stretch of the imagination, even you are pissed.
Also, please don't mistake my comments to mean you guys shouldn't hammer the shit out of the RNC and the republican leadership in general. Castigate the douche bags who came up with the idea for the screen and the Oh So Desperate Patriotism (and its counter punch Belittle Obama and Biden) they pushed all night, but leave the chumps in the cheap seats out of it because they represent the rank and file.
I am not asking for silence on this or any subject, despite what Loki may think. I asking for specificity. In a transition year, the margin for error with formally die-hard republicans is very small. Barack could build a 20% to 20% republican base to perhaps 30% or 40% in November if you guys play your cards right.
I would love to see a 50-State blowout this year. I don't want to wait until 2012, though I think it will happen then because President Obama will raise the bar and by 2010, we'll be sending progressive republicans to Congress. Just as the dems need to clean out the DLC to accomplish everything we are dreaming about.
I see that I need to post a blog on this now because my comments must be too disjointed to be understandable to your more excitable classmates on the left. :O)
September 7, 2008 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I won't make any bones about it, my disgust and revulsion toward the GOP (not its ordinary voters) is directly proportional to my love of this country and to its ideals.
I see the modern GOP as a cancer, a leech, a self-serving glorification of the principle of self over community. Where this country could have gone, how high we could have reached by this year 2008 had we not been burdened with their weight for a hundred years...it makes me profoundly angry.
I once was at a hospice where someone I loved died before me, and within twenty minutes of his demise, his children, teenagers, were cutting up in the room where he lay.
When I read the thread topic, it brought forth that memory. The GOP used 911 at the convention. I find that distasteful. As for the dancing, some people are like that. They are not bad people, so Bruce is right there. But I think the post was aimed at the Party's mindset, the leadership, not the people out in Elmville, or Canarsie, or the Bronx. I believe that leadership is duplicitous, cynical, inimical to democratic government, uncaring of the lives of the people, ruthless, unprincipled, and at the minimum, amoral. Jason wants to steer the party back to its progressive phase and more power to him and his fellow-travelers on that road. I hope the "innate goodness" of the American people will aid him in that quest. Some say that the Soviet Union finally fell, first to glastnost then to Yeltsin and his urban insurrection, because after 60 years of state propaganda extolling the highest aspirations, the people eventually came to take the propaganda at face value and to bring an end to the dissonance.
I hope the same thing can happen to the GOP. Perhaps finally at some point in time, the people will take the propaganda at face value and try and bring an end to the dissonance in that party's expressed ideals and its sordid actuality.
September 6, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
bslev: I hated when George Bush et al used 9/11 for political advantage.
But you don't mind when the McCain campaign does the same? I don't understand your argument at all.
September 6, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your points about GOP leadership (as opposed to those who vote repub) bear repeating:
"I believe that leadership is duplicitous, cynical, inimical to democratic government, uncaring of the lives of the people, ruthless, unprincipled, and at the minimum, amoral."
Sadly, yes.
September 6, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
This was meant as a response to Lux Umba Dei @ 9:43.
Patience is a virtue - and this software is sure trying that virtue!
September 6, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
My, dehumanizing the "other." How Goebbelesque. OTOH it could also be the case that after 7 years Republicans have absorbed this tragedy into their hearts, moved past it, and understand the need to actually combat the philosophy that spawned it.
Just as likely, is the idea that folks like you have only just begun to appreciate the horror after all this time. Tsk.
September 6, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that's perhaps the most arrogant thing I have ever read on this site, and that's saying something. The Republican party has exploited 9/11 for its own purposes for 7 years. So Top Gun McCain is going to combat the philosophy that spawned it? And we should pick up our pompoms and cheer him on, dance to his music? Well, someone needs to tell him he's being flying his plane over the wrong country. Tsk yourself. What happened on 9/11 is intensely personal to many, as Bslev writes above. I am surprised by his reaction, but I understand what he's saying. I don't get you at all.
September 6, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
You don't "get" shooter because you're not a troll.
Why would republicans "move past" anything that still pays them dividends? McCain is still using his POW status to rev up the knuckle-draggers in his party. Heck even Barack feels obligated to bring it up every time he mentions McCain out of fear that he will be accused of NOT honoring this human anachronism.
The irony of successfully using the worst failure of home-land protection in our history for the benefit of those who ignored the warnings will never stop amazing me. Did anyone else hear the interview with Laura when she talked about giggling about the night of 911 when security kept moving her and Dubya upstairs and downstairs? I don't think another American saw anything to laugh at that night.
And John McCain, who was obviously a bad pilot, got shot down and survived. And he has been angry ever since. He can't even treat his wife (meal-ticket) with common courtesy; he calls Palin his "soul-mate" while Cindy walks behind him; he never publicly speaks to her, (maybe since he called her a cu*t he decided he should watch his mouth). This man is a walking time-bomb, and it may very well be because of the experience he touts as his Commander-In-Chief bonafides.
Up is down, black is white, republicans are leaders --
I think we're going to win it in November!
September 6, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The greatest irony to me is that these "small town is the heart of America" folks are the most willing to fear monger and talk about the threat of terrorism, telling us "elitists" in cities on the East Coast, that actually WERE attacked on 9/11, that we are not patriots. Telling city dwellers on the West Coast, another set of targets, that they are the better Americans. It's really outrageous.
September 6, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now I rise in defense of Bslev. Not that he needs my help.
If bslev is correct that the intent of the post was to demonize republicans in general then his criticism of the essay would be entirely correct.
Modern conventions are really highly choreographed, scripted affairs, and the participants are well aware of this.
Gone are the out-of-control, 126 ballot conventions of the past with their insurgencies, their wild and unscripted floor demonstrations.
Americans are much more docile nowadays at the conventions. They understand it is an event made for a national tv audience and they try to help the production along.
Lots of audience cues in a convention.
In the RNC convention, the music that followed the video was such a cue. It was as if the convention management/organizers said, "OK, shift mood now, it is good to get out of the sadness and bring back a light spirit to the floor"
And some responded to that cue, knowing exactly that was what was being suggested.
So no cruelty, no harsh indifference to pain. It would have played out the same with the same video and the same music at the DNC.
September 6, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to draw a comparison between 9/11 and Sarah Palin's Down's baby. When the RNC trots out references to 9/11 the implied message is that the Dems don't care about it. That they somehow are responsible for it in a way that Repubs are not. That could not be less true or more hateful of an unstated message.
Similarly, they have trotted out how wonderful it is that she carried her Down's baby to term rather that terminating the pregnancy. The unstated message here is that a Dem. woman in the same situation would have aborted. That all liberals want to abort defective fetuses and all republicans want to love and cherish them.
When I was pregnant with my son, some of the tests indicated a possibility of Down's. I chose not to have amnio, the most definitive test, because of miscarriage risks. I researched Down's and found that 9 of ten women who find out they are carrying a down's baby choose to abort. I thought this was awful, and sad, because people with Down's can have quite good lives. I knew I wanted my baby no matter what; I also knew that I can't make that choice for other people. I read up on how to care for Down's children just in case. I am a pro-choice liberal and I resent the implication that her personal moral choice proves that I and all other pro-choice dems are immoral. Moreover, I suspect there are plenty of people in that 9 of ten stat who might identify as republicans while keeping their abortion of a down's pregnancy a secret. And that is fine--it's none my business, but it is a stinking hypocrisy that she makes others' choices her business.
I am a patriotic citizen and I likewise resent the implication that because I am a democrat I don't care about 9/11. I know that if I had been at the RNC and seen that footage I would have been upset to the point of tears and nauseated by the juxtaposition with a Top Gun song.
Give me the hokey decorative greek columns over the tawdry abuse of 9/11 twin towers footage any day!
September 6, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yay for grammar!
September 6, 2008 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
To those voices who have encouraged me and supported my post, thank you; let us work together to fight against this party that can twist any heinous image to its own perverse use, and whose disastrous policies of the last eight years have weakened our country and inspired fear instead of national pride. If you are like me, you are tired of standing idle while the leadership of the Republican Party has systematically corrupted the pillars of its own political philosophy – fiscal restraint, the support of human decency, and good government – and supplanted it with incompetence, secrecy, lies, and…there’s really no other word for it but madness.
To those who have criticized the post, I can only agree with you that I could have drawn a clearer distinction between the unpatriotic and immoral act of disgracing those whose lives were lost on 9/11 by using that day for senseless political advantage and the ghoulish act of dancing immediately after it. If I confused you, I am sorry; I’m only human, and was stunned after seeing such a sad display live on my television. I was also very angry. I am still very angry, because it seemed to me that those people who attended the convention that day were glad for what they had just seen. Jubilant. I have trouble forgiving that.
To those Republicans who are as repulsed by this dance macabre or the political travesty that immediately preceded it as many of us are, I have only two questions I would like you to try answering: how do you forgive them; how do you, after forgiving them, still give them your vote?
September 6, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone mentioned "herd mentality" above in a different context, but I think we can see it applied here as well.
The RNC, the McCain campaign, the organizers, they put this together. They chose to show footage of 9/11 for rank political advantage/gain then follow it up with the theme from "Top Gun." Somebody put this idea together and still others thought, Hey! Good idea! They should be ashamed of themselves, no doubt. They should be mocked and thoroughly criticized for it.
The people in the hall were true believers in the Republican Party... In McCain for President. Not making excuses for them here, but they had just spent several days and nights getting all jazzed up for the Republican Party. It does not surprise me that some spontaneously broke out into dance. I find it to be extremely bad taste but it doesn't necessarily follow that they are evil at heart. Just seriously deluded and maybe even dangerously so. But they were in a sort of herd-like-follow-the-crowd-Yay for us situation. Shame on them yes.
But the real shame and is on the organizers. The folks at the RNC and McCain's campaign who approved it all.
They should be fucking ashamed!
September 6, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Voting for progressive candidates, whatever their party, should be enough to demonstrate that not all republicans are cut from the same cloth.
I don't think the democrats need to vilify this year in order to win. We're not talking about true believers anymore, but people who were burned over a number of years. I think the democratic message sells itself to a large slice of the republican electorate who weren't represented in St. Paul. It includes EVERY republican I know.
That is a significant statement in a year when we can't stand any more division and survive as a species, let alone as a nation.
I believe empathy is the democrats best weapon, as outrageous and embarrassing as some of the neocon's theatrics will be this year. I say mimic your candidate and take the high road. It is the place where you can be seen from the dismal depths that this country has descended to.
September 6, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Empathy is humanity's best weapon... always.
But when necessary, shame must be utilized. Shame works. Not a wholesale all encompassing shame in general. But pointed and directed at those who deserve it. The Republican poohbahs who created the RNC spectacle deserve it. It takes nothing away from Obama's message. In fact I suspect he would concur. Don't you?
September 6, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who isn't already ashamed won't be forced into at this point. Especially not by the opposition.
September 6, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
So... no criticizing at all?
September 6, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you can criticize the person and not the party, then criticism is certainly warranted.
I have plenty of criticism for individual "leaders" and their failed policies, on both the left and the right, but try to keep it focused on specific individuals or at the very least groups of individuals rather than the entire "party" of diverse members.
The old labels are in flux right now and many old assumptions are not so safe anymore.
September 6, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I stated in my comment, it's the organizers of that convention--particularly the folks who put together the 9/11 video and followed it with Top Gun silliness that deserve a little shaming. I think that falls into your category or admonition about avoiding tarring the whole party. But yet you still cannot grant me this. You refuse to allow criticism. Are you being intentionally obtuse for some reason?
September 6, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Loki,
Your message is on target, IMO.
It's not toward the people who danced that my anger is directed.
It's at the people who orchestrated the whole spectacle. From the outside, we can see how terribly trivializing it was. The people who died in the 9/11/01 attacks were real people. The shock and grief felt by all Americans crossed any ideological divide. In fact, for a brief time, the attacks bridged that divide, until it was opportunistically exploited and widened by the Karl Rove element that has come to inhabit the gaping space that used to contain the Republican Party's soul.
As an American not as a Democrat or Republican or Independent, I am sickened when an event like the 9/11/01 attacks is trivialized for political purposes.
The horror Chris describes in this post comes from the juxtaposition of the images of the twin towers with the music choice and dancing he observed only moments later. It was trivializing and unspeakably insensitive and disrespectful. And it revealed the evil, craven, opportunistic motivation behind the RNC's politics.
September 6, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes indeed, Laura. Well put. Thanks.
September 6, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
You were "refuting" my comment that democrats seem to swing a broad brush with their criticism and don't really care about debate. It's about retribution and about pointing fingers.
Who can I blame for Bill Clinton priming us for Bush's years? Who do I blame for the democratic Congress giving Reagan every stinking thing he wanted? The time is way past blame, yet you guys all want to blame, blame, blame.
I am fine with you criticizing all you want, just realize that it might produce results that run counter to your stated goals as a party, which is to bring the country together and not break it further apart.
September 6, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was not trying to "refute" anything of the kind.
I want it noted that I have tried... sincerely... to meet you on your own terms. To understand where you were coming from and modulate what I say and how I express myself. Unfortunately to no good.
Jason, I think you've gone over the edge. You cannot see other points of view any longer, without seeing them as stupid or dangerously destructive of the Democratic party or the election of Barack Obama.
This is sad. Your remarks, your attitude toward the genuine debate in this thread is pathetic. You refusal to see that I agree with you is stunning. Your righteousness has thoroughly blinded you.
Remarkable.
September 6, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your inability to see a simple point and to get all melodramatic by the end of said engagement is what I find priceless. That you can't see yourself through that huge splinter in your eye just adds to my enjoyment.
September 7, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jason, I have a dawning wish that you be right.
How wonderful if the GOP is responsive to its voters. But I have seen no evidence of that in the main.
Instead I have seen it purge its moderates, or terrify them into lockstep conformity. Take Olympia Snow for example. And they did this not in defensive reaction to an overbearing Democratic Party power, but as a simple, ruthless matter of internal housekeeping.
Now if the housekeepers of the GOP are responsive to a softening mood or increasing progressivism on the part of their base....that would be all I could ask for before I shuffle off. But I fear the linkage in the GOP is broken, the adjustment dials no longer connect to the hands on the clock face...
You are an optimist, you believe in the power of the people to still wield an influence on the mighty forces that despise them.
God bless you for that. We are lost without people like you.
September 6, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you guys faced as big a challenge in the democratic party and Barack Obama just beat out the DLC for control. I don't think the democratic party has been truly response to its ideals since Jimmy Carter at least and hasn't been effective since Johnson.
The same housecleaning you are starting (with republican help I might add) in the democratic party is the place the GOP needs to get. Politics is no different than commerce. As the face of the electorate changes, the face of those leaders who step into the breach will change as well.
Olympia Snowe is a passionate and respected elder in my republican party of 2009. She is joined by freshman legislators raised up by the people in charge - the voters.
If the GOP doesn't listen, I continue to vote for democrats in the general election. As will more and more republicans like me. Sooner or later, a tipping point will be reached that forces the GOP to reclaim its roots.
Just as Barack Obama forced the democrats to look a little more closely at their deeds over the last 40 years as well and take responsibility for their part in our collective mess.
September 7, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Republican Leadership: Stay home when the storms come, get up and dance after the planes come.
Truly sad and pathetic.
September 6, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh. I'm glad I didn't see that. But thanks for this post, Chris.
I know a lot of decent conservative people who still vote Republican. But it's because their minds hold an outdated image of the Republican Party. No trace of the conservative values once attributed to the Republican Party can be found there any longer. Any real benevolence that may have underpinned that image has disappeared over the years. These folks just haven't realized it yet, I guess.
I have to believe that if they understood what motivates the people who are now in control of the Republican Party -- and this post describes an eloquent revelation of their hideous, craven nature -- they would be as repulsed as we are. God how I wish they could see what a malevolent, deceiving bunch they are!
September 6, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
LJ: I have to believe that if they understood what motivates the people who are now in control of the Republican Party -- and this post describes an eloquent revelation of their hideous, craven nature -- they would be as repulsed as we are.
I cannot agree, Laura, although your gentle tolerance is praiseworthy.
Those people to whom you refer as decent don't need to understand motives. They are witnesses to Republican behavior in all three branches of the Federal government over the past eight years. If these people have not seen the corruption and the brutality, they are negligent. If they have seen it and vote Republican anyway, they are complicit.
(If this shows up twice, well, I waited almost an hour in between postings.)
September 6, 2008 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, hoonoo, they may be negligent and complacent, it's true. I can't argue with that.
However, the people of whom I speak are friends and members of my own family, and I've known and loved them for many years. Whatever their reasons may be, they have (to this date, anyway) chosen to NOT see what the Republican Party has become...how it does NOT act in a way that reflects their values.
They may be flawed, but they're indeed decent people.
The way I see it, we need to find a way to be persuasive -- to get them to see reality -- without coming across as condescending or self-righteous. It's hard to do, but it's the best way to approach them.
September 6, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
We all understand. Most of us have people in our lives that fit that description.
If you want to retain their goodwill, though, it's best not to try to persuade. It's like the old saw about teaching a pig to whistle. It never succeeds, and it simply annoys the pig.
September 6, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to believe that if they understood what motivates the people who are now in control of the Republican Party -- and this post describes an eloquent revelation of their hideous, craven nature -- they would be as repulsed as we are.
I'm afraid I can't agree with you, Laura. Those people don't need to understand motives. They can witness behavior. If they don't see the repulsive behavior, they are negligent citizens. If they do see it and vote for the corruption that is the current Republican Party anyway, they are complicit.
September 6, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
9/11 has never been anything to the Republicans but a chance to score points and make people so afraid they can't think. They were dancing on democracy's grave as they have for the past eight years.
September 6, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
dancing on democracy's grave
Now there's a slogan!
September 6, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
a slogan re the RNC.
September 6, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know what it reminds me of? The description of the Two Minutes Hate in "Nineteen Eighty Four" and how it ended with a picture of Big Brother which invariably was followed a self-soothing chant of "BB BB BB BB."
Yes, my friends, we are assailed from without by Eurasian hordes and from within by the agents of Goldstein, but our heroic Big Brother will protectively step between us and them, oh, how we adore him.
September 6, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chris Berry - I wanted 100 recommends for you! Now it's 101. A lovely number, I think! Possibly a prime number. (I love prime numbers!)
Please continue your wonderful writing! Especially for this election.
September 6, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chris Berry - I wanted 100 recommends for you! Now it's 101. A lovely number, I think! Possibly a prime number. (I love prime numbers!)
Please continue your wonderful writing! Especially for this election.
September 6, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quite a post! Jason is right though to remind us of the importance of empathy. As much as we must resist actions that cause harm, we can still see the humanity and even divinity in those who are behind those actions.
A curious situation indeed.
September 6, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
September 7, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: The "liberal" party. Whatever it is you stand for, is completely lost in your sophomoric generalizations and complete inability to see beyond your own narrow view. In other words, a lack of empathy. Ironic in a liberal.
So now you assume that I'm a liberal. Remember Uma, Jason! Remember Uma!
You are correct, though, in stating that the attitude you describe would be ironic in a liberal. But it is perfectly normal for a conservative Republican.
And you would be...?
September 6, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sense a fatal contradiction in my own ideals and my heated partisanship. I once posted something about dragonflies and pepperpods and now I see how far I have drifted from that position.
I will point out Obama's strengths and the need for change, and the disastrous policies of the past, but I will demonize no more.
Jason, I am joining you.
September 6, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pepper pod.
Add wings.
Dragonfly.
September 7, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
JEM: You have something to offer besides lame one-liners?
Nope. One-liners are all I have. Again, this can be blamed on both the fact that I am incapable of rational thought and because of my insistence on demonizing anyone who is not a registered Democrat.
September 7, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
How about this? What if Democrats had been filmed within one hour of the showing of 911 footage? What do you think the "word" would be today?
These people use anything and everything including outright lies and theft. Obama's message was change. Guess what McCain's NEW message is: CHANGE. Does he plan to impletment change? NO He just plans to run on it, just like DUbya ran on "reaching across the isle" although he had no intention to do so.
Obama and Biden brought up that jobs, homes, health insurance, etc WERE NOT EVEN MENTIONED DURING THE REPUB CONVENTION. So now they are giving those areas lip service, using almost the exact same wording as the dems (minus the specifics, of course).
They steal every idea as a talking point, but they have NO intention of helping on those issues! I am so mad, but I will say this: If they win, it is over. We are done. I have 3 children and I am so worried about them.
I just hope that my theory about the cell-phone generation that is the Obama Underground (and is not ever polled) and will come out in force and give us a landslide election!
September 7, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment