Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Conservative Columnist Kathleen Parker Calls for Palin To Drop Out

You just need to read this one for yourself.  From the National Review Online:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZiMDhjYTU1NmI5Y2MwZjg2MWNiMWMyYTUxZDkwNTE=


Is there a movement bubbling under on the Republican side?  Did someone from the McCain campaign suggest she write this, now that Palin's debate with Biden appears to be on again?

This could be a lot of fun.


Comments (57)

avatar

I don't think she can go. It would require blinking.

Silly! Everyone knows a deer caught in the headlights CAN'T blink.

Sorry, her ex-brother-in-law tazed that deer, her daddy processed it, and she and the kiddies ate it. Then she filed a complaint saying he used her sister's permit to taze the deer from his state tropper airplane while drunkenly threatening to kill her father. But she did not pressure anyone to fire him. If you will turn off the headlights we can get on with the wedding.

avatar

No, no, no! -- you've got it wrong!

He doesn't blink because he was a POW!

After McCain's performance last night, I'm convinced it would be political suicide to let Palin debate Biden. I mean seriously, the only danger here is that Biden might appear that he's picking on the girl.

I suspect you will see a family emergency arise, and Palin, for the betterment of her family, will resign or whatever.

What will she do when Biden's head rears up, into her airspace, cuz that's where he will come first, to Alaska. She'll have to send those out, for protection.

Maybe she can debate Henry Kissinger? You know, expose his naivete.

Hi Everybody!!!

Let me tell ya, when Track was going there, you know, to defend the oil drilling from the Russians, he was doing it for them, and, and, I am just SO proud. Really proud of all those people expressing their appreciation for America, where it border, you know Russia, and, oh yeah, Canada too, and they those... those reporters, they... yeah me for saying it... and we.. werwpi .. .erewiersh................. SDFedre1!!!

Okay, by now,
Sarah
(2009-2010ish)

HEY SARAH! Welcome to TPM, I had no idea you were a reader!

How's Trig?

I don't think that's Sarah. I didn't hear "yup, yup." Not even once.

avatar

"I'll dig down an' get back to ya on that!" -- Palin/POW

Oh god, did you have the same vision I did? Just incredible. In three short interviews Palin has given us a years worth of yuks. Even Shrub couldn't do that!!!
The head rears up!!!!!!!!

I read the blog on townhall.com and Palin admirers are throwing Parker under the bus---hee hee hee. You know how they're defending Palin? By smearing Obama, e.g. his misspeak is saying 57 states instead of 50, that he's a secret Muslim, Ayers, etc. By smearing Biden, e.g. hair plugs, veneer teeth, him asking a man in a wheelchair to stand up, etc.
If they can't hear, can't they take the time to read what she's saying? She's a joke. But I hope she doesn't drop out by saying her family/kids need her, McCain will get some sympathy vote.

avatar

Wingnuts will no doubt have a temper tantrum over Parker and others telling it like it is. But I think they protest too much. Now many conservatives are joining the rest of the country in admitting, this trophy veep is simply in over her beehive.

Can we say it now, now that she truly has had her deer-in-the-headlights moments? Sarah Quaylin

Hi Everybody!!!

I served with Dan Quayle, I knew Dan Quayle, Dan Quayle was a friend of mine. I am not Dan Quayle.

Okay, by now,
Sarah
(2009-2010ish)

tpm Sarah, you are so endearing. We will hate to lose you on Nov 5 - or sooner - but perhaps you could still grace us with your presence, possibly joining forces with our dear idiotic.

Consider it, tpm Sarah. Switch sides!

Sad to say, but she's hella lot worse that the Quaylester.

avatar

I don't know that I'd go that far. It's possible she could spell "potato" correctly -- it's a cold climate/frozen ground veggie.

And she's likely been coached on that talking point.

avatar

Thanks for the link, which I am circulating.

Good for Kathleen Parker for the courage she showed in writing that column.

Maybe she could just call for the republican ticket to "fold" now. And get out of the game!

Am I the only one the link is not working for?

Sarah, dear, can you help? You're so "ready"!

avatar

It didn't work for me, either. Try this

Yeah, sorry. What happened is, I pasted the link on the page then clicked the "Link" button and put a placeholder in the popup dialog. It's supposed to be the other way around. Duh. Life can be so confusing sometimes. Anyway, here's a working link:

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZiMDhjYTU1NmI5Y2MwZjg2MWNiMWMyYTUxZDkwNTE=

The Washington Post has an article today about all the gifts Palin has accepted as Governor of Alaska. The article says "a spokeswoman for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign said the gifts had no undue influence on her."

In response the Russian government announced Prime Minister Putin has suspended his practice of dropping Mardi Gras beads from his plane while in Alaskan airspace.

avatar

So THAT's what it is! --

From the outset I've believed Palin too close to the Ruskies for comfort. Now we learn its because she loves those cheap plastic beads with which the Commies have been showering her!?

I read that. I was quite surprised. Honestly. She loved Palin, absolutely loved her.

avatar

Yeah: a member of the Airheads for Airheads contingent of feminists.

Parker writes:McCain can’t repudiate his choice for running mate. He not only risks the wrath of the GOP’s unforgiving base, but he invites others to second-guess his executive decision-making ability.

It is remarkable that, despite the above quote, Kathleen Parker herself is apparently NOT questioning McCain's "executive decision-making ability!" She's right that it would be questioned if he dumped Palin... but it should be in question RIGHT NOW!

For everything she said in her article, John McCain's decision making and leadership qualities should be in question! Parker should be appalled at McCain's rank opportunism and genuine stupidity. That should be her next column!

Ugh!


Exactly, loki!

It just makes you wonder what kind of person McCain would put in charge of FEMA?

Good judgement or reckless? The American people know the answer to that.

DAMN! You beat me to it! Nice job. It's also on ABC, actually, which is where I originally read it. But it's quoted in a larger article about how McCain has to own the bailout at this point.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/Story?id=3105288&page=1

avatar

It's been a bad week for McCain/Palin when Rove, Buchanan and Parker are all heaping on. I get nauseated when I am forced to agree with Karl Rove...

avatar

Give me a brake! Rove can't hold a candle to McCain.

McCain, unlike Rove, was a POW!

avatar

The Elephant In The Room,

That Ms. Parker does not want any of you to notice.


The unqualified and unready Sarah Palin was picked by John McCain.

That makes him even a bigger risk than Sarah Palin, since he would be the actual President.

Ms. Parker is just covering her own arse, by trying to catch up with voters. They have been way ahead of her.

Ms. Parker even devised a way for Sarah Palin to be dropped from the ticket, that would make McCain look good, for making such a reckless and imbecilic selection.

Ms. Parker; put the blame where it belongs. Blame John McCain

Once it becomes universally accepted that Palin was a terrible choice, all eyes will turn to McCain.

His judgement will be openly questioned. Just give it some time.

avatar

Que Sarah sera: always the beauty contestant answering serious questions with the knowledge of a blank slate.

The money quote:

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

Sarah Palin is George W. Bush without the education or political acumen.

Let that sink in for a moment.

Right!

This is amazing.

Here's a prediction (and I'm not joking either): Palin drops out early next week for "family reasons". They simply can not allow her to attend the debate, and the word is now out that she's a clueless dimwit.

You heard it here first. Palin's out before the debate.

I would bet if I didn't think it was such a likely possibility.

avatar

Watching this, recently up at the mother ship, has left me feeling as though the chances she will step aside are considerably higher than I thought they were earlier today.

Ouch. And wow. 117 recs already, as I write.

Here's a slightly different scenario...(one suggested by a poster from elsewhere) Palin drops out because Democrats have hounded her out. This is totally believable knowing the rovians as we do. It might save mccain with the gop base, but would it save him from the obvious question about his judgment in choosing her to begin with?

If they blame it on the Dems., they lose more than they would gain by having her off the ticket. That would just bolster the argument that she was never prepared to begin with. If she drops out for her own personal, family reasons, she'll look like a good mother, and McCain might not lose as much as he would otherwise. Pointing the finger elsewhere will do no good.

One other possibility: the McCain staff wires her with explosives and a remote control detonator. Then they send her in to the debates...

Actually, there is one more possibility, and I would be willing to bet it's been discussed within the McCain campaign. They pull their legal support team from Alaska and allow the Troopergate thing to go forward. She drops out because it's becoming too much of a distraction, or they throw her under the bus and claim she lied to them.

From Andrew Sullivan:

My own view is that she is such a massive joke she will kill the ticket; but if McCain asked her to withdraw, it would so destroy his own record of judgment, he would also lose. So we have two scenarios: either they struggle on, keep the Schmidt fireworks to distract from reality, and hope that racism and Christianism will somehow get them to the finishing line - or we start all over with Romney. But it's getting too late to switch GOP candidates.

I don't think the Palin problem is fixable. She is who she is: an unqualified fundamentalist liar with no knowledge of or experience in national domestic or foreign policy. And McCain had absolutely no idea who she was when he picked her.

I tend to agree with him here. But we'll see what happens.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/palin-is-gettin.html

The two of them are in a death grip... going down with the Titanic republican campaign.

I can't say this is impossible, but I consider it to be highly unlikely. This would most likely be a big minus for McCain at this point. There's also the complication of meeting ballot deadlines. I've been doing some research to determine what that would look like, and I may write about it, but there would be complications in complying with the election laws in all 50 states.

If she drops out it won't be for family reasons, it will because the media--and in particular that big meanie, Katie Couric--are too sexist to accept a strong woman in the white house.

For once, I disagree with many of my favorite TPM'ers.
IMO, what y'all suffer from is a poignant combination of intelligence, logic and optimism.
But when did the Repugs ever worry about that?
Why present (a) prepared, reasonable candidate(s) when you can present (a) holigraph(s)? Why take responsibility for your own ambition-driven, histrionic decisions when you can project that behavior onto your reasonable, Presidential-acting opponent?
Why call black white when you can call half-black/half-white all black?
See what I mean? Palin will not drop out. Because in a reasonable world she would never have accepted the nod; therefore, she's in for the duration.
Circulate that wolf paw video. Because, if you'll pardon the pun, cut to the chase.

Never said she would. Just saying the possibility is actually there. The possibility is apparent, and real. When you have people like Kathleen Parker calling for her to drop out, and K-Lo saying, "...that’s not a crazy suggestion", it's difficult to say it couldn't happen given the climate. But like I said above, I tend to agree with Andrew Sullivan, that it won't happen, because McCain would lose more by dropping her than he does by keeping her at this point. Still, the idea is floating around. I don't hear it floating around for any of the other candidates.

Palin might be a beard for the REAL vice-presidential candidate: someone similar to Romney and not a fundamentalist female. Like Harriet Miers, Palin's real role may be generating support while serving as a symbolic placeholder.

I'm experiencing utter befuddlement. I don't know whether to laugh or cry at this point.

At least everyone else is getting this as a disastrous joke. Again. utter befuddlement.

McCain has to much honor to boot Sarah from the ticket.

He would rather lose an election than lose a soulmate.

avatar

Parker hits the nail on the head: "If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself."

What do you call a hockey mom who advocates "abstinence only" education? -- Grandma!

(this is a bit unfair, but I couldn't help passing it along--compliments of a commenter at Politico.com--- because it's also, well.. a bit funny)

avatar

The election ended when the Reagan Revolution ended -- with the announcement of the Wall Street Bailout. Sarah Palin is the frosting on the cake already baked.

Interestingly, Palin as VP was the equivalent of deregulation: the wing-and-a-prayer theory that we can grow our way out of common sense and caution. Full speed ahead in the markets, and real estate values will always rise keeping us safe from our own mistakes. Full speed ahead with Sarah and her beauty and novelty will keep her afloat while we put her through presidential boot camp. Just need to stay in front of the curve, that's all.

In both cases, reality is the enemy of theory and time is reality's ally. We're paying now for mistakes first made decades ago. McCain is paying now for a mistake he made weeks ago. It's gonna catch up to you one way or another.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address