« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Colin Powell's Thoughts on Sarah Palin
Colin Powell remains the last significant endorsement in the political arena, especially because of his ambivalence. The Republican refused to attend either convention, including that of his own political party.
I wonder what effect the VP decision of each campaign could have on his endorsement choice. After all, he knows Sen. Biden extremely well and has a strong confidence in his credentials. During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Biden espoused several key tenets of the so-called Powell Doctrine, such as exhausting diplomacy, maximizing our allies and legitimacy in the run-up, and using overwhelming force - all of which are fundamentally at odds with the Bush Doctrine.
On the other hand, McCain is at the top of the ticket for the GOP. His resume is thick, but sometimes at odds with Powell's views. McCain's recent performance with Russia is a perfect example of that. Meanwhile, McCain's judgment comes sharply in question with the choice of Sarah Palin, who openly denigrated experience, hires buddies over more qualified candidates, and insists that we should be so committed to the mission that we must never blink. Also, her views on Russia range from naive to nutball.
I can't say how much of a newscycle the Powell endorsement may garner, especially given the extreme pace the campaign will likely take in the next two months, but a Sunday morning slot for the announcement could have wide reverberations.
For someone who may be best remembered by generation for holding a test tube of anthrax at the UN, Powell may not be all that excited about 4 more years of Bush policies - particularly with a dangerously incurious ideologue VP choice for a cancer-surviving 72-year-old. He may, however, be excited about another African-American pioneer that shows a willingness to engage publicly in the nuanced chess game of foreign policy.








Comments (5)
Unfortunately, Powell has lost his once 90% approval rating and has little credibility with both the left and the right. I do think his endorsement would carry some weight, especially if he said, "I see the same mentality and the same players controlling John McCain as controlled George Bush and I feel the need to warn the American people."
Another person who I think could really send this message: Scott McClellan. He has even less credibility than Powell as far as his personal integrity goes, but is the perfect person to deliver this message. I think this statement would be very powerful coming from Scotty boy: "In the last few weeks, McCain has proven to me by his tactics and his choices that he will govern from the "permanent campaign" mentality. He did not pick the person he thought was most qualified to govern; he picked the person Karl Rove told him to pick. He has allowed the same lobbyists who manipulated George Bush to write his policies. Trust me, it is very easy to get caught in the bubble mentality of winning at all costs and to pile lie upon lie in your quest ot control the narrative. It happened to me and, I am very sad to say, it has happened to John McCain."
In fact, I think I might just write Scotty boy a letter with that suggestion. What could it hurt?
September 14, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is my letter to Scott McClellan:
I am a fellow Austinite who has watched with horror to the collapse of credibility of our government institutions and international reputation under eight years of the Bush administration. When you were press secretary I often felt anger or frustration with your answers, and with the press corps who seemed unable and unwilling to get to the truth. But, while I felt contempt for many other figures in the Bush administration, I always felt some empathy for you. It always seemed to me that you were uncomfortable in your role of relaying half-truths, lies, and stonewalling. Perhaps I imagined it, but I sensed at times that it was truly painful for you to have the job of keeping the truth from the American public and silencing legitimate critics and lines of inquiry. I actually felt a great deal of compassion for you.
I read your fascinating book and I admire your courage for writing it. It confirmed for me that I had not imagined that conflict in your heart. It is strange thing for a lifelong Democrat, but some of the people I most admire in the past eight years are those who might have been ideologically on the right but whose own sense of integrity caused them to examine the tactics and reality of what the Bush administration has done—to the constitution, the department of justice, America’s foreign policy—and to speak out. People like Colin Powell, James Comey, Jack Goldsmith, Col. Morris Davis and now you are, in my mind, true patriots.
I heard you say on several talk shows that you had not decided who you would vote for in November, nor whether you would endorse. I heard you say you would be looking very closely at which candidate would focus on governance and not on the “permanent campaign mentality.” I am not asking you to endorse Barack Obama. I don’t know how much weight such an endorsement would have, frankly.
But I do believe that you are in a truly unique position to make a statement about what we have all seen happening to the McCain campaign. It is obvious he did not pick any of the people he believed could best govern our nation for vice president. He let Karl Rove pick the VP that would energize the base. He has handed over the reigns of his campaign to the very people who demonized him in 2000. He has learned that when caught in a lie you repeat the lie over and over, and he has learned it from the masters. You have talked compellingly about how easy it is to get caught in the bubble and, tragically, it appears to me, that the bubble has engulfed another once-honorable man in John McCain. You can make a difference by calling him out publically. Please do it soon, before Karl Rove gets another eight years in power.
September 14, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given his well known positions on the use of the military and diplomacy, how could Powell not endorse Obama/Biden over McCain/Palin? He is too cautious here.
September 14, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
xIt would be great to have the Powell endoresement, but what I want to know is where the *f**k* are the Clintons? If I don't see them out every day, I will work as hard as I can and give as much money as I can to replace Hillary. She cannot be just for herself. This election affects too many issues and too many people. If they cannot support Barack's effort now - she will never earn my support later.
September 14, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Powell endorsement would take up AT LEAST 2 days. One day for the scoop and the next day for the endorsement. Maybe one more day for the spill of the enormity of it all.
September 14, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment