« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Attention & Alert
Okay boys and girls today's Talking Point is:
Phil Graham, McInsane's lead financial advisor and BFF, wrote the law that destoryed the economy . . . And Graham believes that ecomony is fine, it is just that American's whine.
Go forth and spread the Talking Point Say it to at least five people today . . . AND oh yeah . . . God be with you.
Advertisement















Comments (9)
I totally agree. I think this should be the next Obama ad, it keeps with his McLobbyist theme but it's much more important:
McCain's economic advisor passed laws and lobbied for years to deregulate banks and that is what caused our economic crisis. Easy enough for the American people to understand.
There was a story on NPR a while ago about another Gramm bill that allows banks to fudge their holdings in some way that makes it appear they were more solvent than they are. The guest was saying that this is the next looming economic crisis and it could be bigger than the mortgage crisis. In fact, I suspected, when the Government mentioned that they seized Freddie and Fanny because of abnormalities in their accounting, it had to do with this taking advantage of this law, but I don't remember what the bill was. Do you?
September 15, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, boys and girls, here's some friendly advice: It's spelled "Gramm," not "Graham."
If you can't get the basics right, you'll look like you don't know what you're talking about.
September 15, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I apologize for the typos I also pooched "destroy" . . . I NEED to avoid posting on the fly on my Treo.
September 15, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
LET TRY:
Attention & Alert
Okay boys and girls,
Today's Talking Point is:
Phil Gramm, McCain’s lead financial advisor and BFF, wrote the law that destroyed the economy . . . And Gramm believes and states that the American economy is fine; it is just that the American people are just whiners.
Go forth and spread the Talking Point. Say it to at least five people today . . . AND, oh yeah, God be with you.
September 15, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this is a good idea, but I really don't understand exactly what Gramm's bill did. Could you provide a simple explanation so that if I end up in a discussion on this I won't sound like an idiot? -- not an unlikely outcome when discussing economics.
Also, are Democrats complicit in this in some way? Anything that can come back to haunt us if this does start to dominate the Wall Street/election conversation?
September 15, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Found it! Here's the story I was thinking of where Michael Greenberger explains the deregulation I was thinking of. It's a really complicated story but he explains it pretty well.
At about 4:18, he talks about Gramm's role:
The bill allows "credit default swaps" which involves hedge fund-like bets on credit defaults--betting on whether homeowners will pay off their loans--and the banks had all bet that the homeowners would pay off their loans and so they are now losing massive amounts of money. To make matters worse the banks considered the bets themselves really solid assets and put them on their books as assets. But the law also allowed the banks to place the bets, not through any hedge fund or traceable market venue, but through "offbook" entities called structured investment vehicles. So when the banks started losing massive amounts of money they weren't putting those losses on their balance sheets.
When the feds last week said something vague about the takeover of Freddie and Fanny being triggered by their accounting process, I thought immediately of this. I think this needs to be investigated throroughly. Maybe a call to Michael Greenberger.
September 15, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, that was very helpful I am sending this on.
September 15, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since this thread has already dropped off the recent reader posts, I've posted a new thread here to TPM muckraker to discuss just this aspect of Gramm's involvement.
I've also written to Michael Greenberger and asked him to comment on how linked he thinks the Commodity Futures Moderinization Act is to the Freddie/Fannie bailout. I'll post his response in that thread.
September 15, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point of a Talking point is the ‘sound-bitey’ nature. While there is truth in ours and often little or none in theirs . . . Having to explain it, kills it. Deliver it with gusto and self-absurdity.
In a nut shell, the Law bearing Gramm's name allowed banks to become investment banks and allowed companies to speculate in the commodities they generate.
This lead to creating securities from bundled loans then buying/selling these securities with 99% leveraging.
This lead to Enron’s house of cards financing of their organization and the bilking their investors AND customers.
This lead to oil companies record-profits due to their ability to drive up prices on the oil futures then passing the ‘costs’ onto us at the pump.
Yada yada.
September 15, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment