« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
"About Sarah Palin" by Someone Who Knows Her
This post, apparently circulated originally as a private e-mail, is making the rounds of political blogs today and deserves to be seen here. It first appeared on the web as a comment to <a href="http://www.washingtonindependent.com/3671/the-reform-candidate">this article</a> in the Washington Independent. Because the commenter there didn't respect the original author's request NOT to appear on the web, I've removed the author's name and contact information from my version of text. Everything else is unchanged. As you will see, it provides the most complete picture we've seen so far of the early years of Sarah Palin's career, from someone who knows her well from Wasilla political circles. The criticisms of Palin's governing style and priorities fit the emerging pattern. They are concrete and well documented, and deserve further investigation. The e-mail itself has been <a href="http://fairlyconservative.com/the-race-for-president/a-chat-with-anne-kilkenny-from-alaska/">validated</a> by a conservative blogger who wanted it to be a hoax, but who was able to get in direct contact with its author. Enjoy!
============
Dear friends,
So many people have asked me about what I know about Sarah Palin in the last 2 days that I decided to write something up...
Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in common: their gender and their good looks. :)
You have my permission to forward this to your friends/email contacts with my name and email address attached, but please do not post it on any websites, as there are too many kooks out there...
Thanks, [author's name]
ABOUT SARAH PALIN
I am a resident of Wasilla, Alaska. I have known Sarah since 1992. Everyone here knows Sarah, so it is nothing special to say we are on a first-name basis. Our children have attended the same schools. Her father was my child's favorite substitute teacher. I also am on a first name basis with her parents and mother-in-law. I attended more City Council meetings during her administration than about 99% of the residents of the city.
She is enormously popular; in every way she's like the most popular girl in middle school. Even men who think she is a poor choice and won't vote for her can't quit smiling when talking about her because she is a "babe".
It is astonishing and almost scary how well she can keep a secret. She kept her most recent pregnancy a secret from her children and parents for seven months.
She is "pro-life". She recently gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby. There is no cover-up involved, here; Trig is her baby.
She is energetic and hardworking. She regularly worked out at the gym.
She is savvy. She doesn't take positions; she just "puts things out there" and if they prove to be popular, then she takes credit.
Her husband works a union job on the North Slope for BP and is a champion snowmobile racer. Todd Palin's kind of job is highly sought-after because of the schedule and high pay. He arranges his work schedule so he can fish for salmon in Bristol Bay for a month or so in summer, but by no stretch of the imagination is fishing their major source of income. Nor has her life-style ever been anything like that of native Alaskans.
Sarah and her whole family are avid hunters.
She's smart.
Her experience is as mayor of a city with a population of about 5,000 (at the time), and less than 2 years as governor of a state with about 670,000 residents.
During her mayoral administration most of the actual work of running this small city was turned over to an administrator. She had been pushed to hire this administrator by party power-brokers after she had gotten herself into some trouble over precipitous firings which had given rise to a recall campaign.
Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a "fiscal conservative". During her 6 years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over 33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation (1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they benefited residents.
The huge increases in tax revenues during her mayoral administration weren't enough to fund everything on her wish list though, borrowed money was needed, too. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it with indebtedness of over $22 million. What did Mayor Palin encourage the voters to borrow money for? Was it the infrastructure that she said she supported? The sewage treatment plant that the city lacked? or a new library? No. $1m for a park. $15m-plus for construction of a multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece of property that the City didn't even have clear title to, that was still in litigation 7 yrs later--to the delight of the lawyers involved! The sports complex itself is a nice addition to the community but a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it would be. She also supported bonds for $5.5m for road projects that could have been done in 5-7 yrs without any borrowing.
While Mayor, City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office redecorated more than once.These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city.
As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state.
In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today's surplus, borrow for needs.
She's not very tolerant of divergent opinions or open to outside ideas or compromise. As Mayor, she fought ideas that weren't generated by her or her staff. Ideas weren't evaluated on their merits, but on the basis of who proposed them.
While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the Librarian are on her enemies list to this day.
Sarah complained about the "old boy's club" when she first ran for Mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of "old boys". Palin fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the City and as Governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people, creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally grateful and fiercely loyal--loyal to the point of abusing their power to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the case of pressuring the State's top cop (see below).
As Mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla's Police Chief because he "intimidated" her, she told the press. As Governor, her recent firing of Alaska's top cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure and she had every legal right to fire him, but it's pretty clear that an important factor in her decision to fire him was because he wouldn't fire her sister's ex-husband, a State Trooper. Under investigation for abuse of power, she has had to admit that more than 2 dozen contacts were made between her staff and family to the person that she later fired, pressuring him to fire her ex-brother-in-law. She tried to replace the man she fired with a man who she knew had been reprimanded for sexual harassment; when this caused a public furor, she withdrew her support.
She has bitten the hand of every person who extended theirs to her in help. The City Council person who personally escorted her around town introducing her to voters when she first ran for Wasilla City Council became one of her first targets when she was later elected Mayor. She abruptly fired her loyal City Administrator; even people who didn't like the guy were stunned by this ruthlessness.
Fear of retribution has kept all of these people from saying anything publicly about her.
When then-Governor Murkowski was handing out political plums, Sarah got the best, Chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission: one of the few jobs not in Juneau and one of the best paid. She had no background in oil & gas issues. Within months of scoring this great job which paid $122,400/yr, she was complaining in the press about the high salary. I was told that she hated that job: the commute, the structured hours, the work. Sarah became aware that a member of this Commission (who was also the State Chair of the Republican Party) engaged in unethical behavior on the job. In a gutsy move which some undoubtedly cautioned her could be political suicide, Sarah solved all her problems in one fell swoop: got out of the job she hated and garnered gobs of media attention as the patron saint of ethics and as a gutsy fighter against the "old boys' club" when she dramatically quit, exposing this man's ethics violations (for which he was fined).
As Mayor, she had her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork from Senator Ted Stevens. Lately, she has castigated his pork-barrel politics and publicly humiliated him. She only opposed the "bridge to nowhere" after it became clear that it would be unwise not to.
As Governor, she gave the Legislature no direction and budget guidelines, then made a big grandstand display of line-item vetoing projects, calling them pork. Public outcry and further legislative action restored most of these projects--which had been vetoed simply because she was not aware of their importance--but with the unobservant she had gained a reputation as "anti-pork".
She is solidly Republican: no political maverick. The State party leaders hate her because she has bit them in the back and humiliated them. Other members of the party object to her self-description as a fiscal conservative.
Around Wasilla there are people who went to high school with Sarah. They call her "Sarah Barracuda" because of her unbridled ambition and predatory ruthlessness. Before she became so powerful, very ugly stories circulated around town about shenanigans she pulled to be made point guard on the high school basketball team. When Sarah's mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and experienced manager, ran for Mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her.
As Governor, she stepped outside of the box and put together of package of legislation known as "AGIA" that forced the oil companies to march to the beat of her drum.
Like most Alaskans, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. She has questioned if the loss of sea ice is linked to global warming. She campaigned "as a private citizen" against a state initiaitive that would have either a) protected salmon streams from pollution from mines, or b) tied up in the courts all mining in the state (depending on who you listen to). She has pushed the State's lawsuit against the Dept. of the Interior's decision to list polar bears as threatened species.
McCain is the oldest person to ever run for President; Sarah will be a heartbeat away from being President.
There has to be literally millions of Americans who are more knowledgeable and experienced than she.
However, there's a lot of people who have underestimated her and are regretting it.
CLAIM VS FACT
• "Hockey mom": true for a few years• "PTA mom": true years ago when her first-born was in elementary school, not since• "NRA supporter": absolutely true• social conservative: mixed. Opposes gay marriage, BUT vetoed a bill that would have denied benefits to employees in same-sex relationships (said she did this because it was unconsitutional).• pro-creationism: mixed. Supports it, BUT did nothing as Governor to promote it.• "Pro-life": mixed. Knowingly gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby BUT declined to call a special legislative session on some pro-life legislation• "Experienced": Some high schools have more students than Wasilla has residents. Many cities have more residents than the state of Alaska. No legislative experience other than City Council. Little hands-on supervisory or managerial experience; needed help of a city administrator to run town of about 5,000.• political maverick: not at all• gutsy: absolutely!• open & transparent: ??? Good at keeping secrets. Not good at explaining actions.• has a developed philosophy of public policy: no• "a Greenie": no. Turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores and disconnected parking lots. Is pro-drilling off-shore and in ANWR.• fiscal conservative: not by my definition!• pro-infrastructure: No. Promoted a sports complex and park in a city without a sewage treatment plant or storm drainage system. Built streets to early 20th century standards.• pro-tax relief: Lowered taxes for businesses, increased tax burden on residents• pro-small government: No. Oversaw greatest expansion of city government in Wasilla's history.• pro-labor/pro-union. No. Just because her husband works union doesn't make her pro-labor. I have seen nothing to support any claim that she is pro-labor/pro-union.
WHY AM I WRITING THIS?
First, I have long believed in the importance of being an informed voter. I am a voter registrar. For 10 years I put on student voting programs in the schools. If you google my name ([author's name] + Alaska), you will find references to my participation in local government, education, and PTA/parent organizations.
Secondly, I've always operated in the belief that "Bad things happen when good people stay silent". Few people know as much as I do because few have gone to as many City Council meetings.
Third, I am just a housewife. I don't have a job she can bump me out of. I don't belong to any organization that she can hurt. But, I am no fool; she is immensely popular here, and it is likely that this will cost me somehow in the future: that's life.
Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100 or so people who rallied to support the City Librarian against Sarah's attempt at censorship.
Fifth, I looked around and realized that everybody else was afraid to say anything because they were somehow vulnerable.
CAVEATS
I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in spending & taxation 2 years ago (when Palin was running for Governor) from information supplied to me by the Finance Director of the City of Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible for a private person to get any info out of City Hall--they are swamped. So I can't verify my numbers.
You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000", up to 9,000. The day Palin's selection was announced a city official told me that the current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was 5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was Mayor from 1996 to 2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90's.
[author's name][e-mail]August 31, 2008






Comments (30)
Interesting information but it needs to be backed up with data, or at least the author's name.
September 3, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Click on the links in the first paragraph (unfortunately, they deleted my correctly formatted version of this post) and you will find the author's name.
September 3, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is so specific it is obviously written by someone who knows her.
Some of the statements have already been backed up with facts, i.e., the precipitous firing of the librarian and the Police Chief, and the hiring of a city admininstrator.
The information regarding the increase in the town's budget during her tenure and the sports center have already been published.
Actually, Sarah Palin sounds a lot like George Bush -- loyalty first, brooks no dissent and intellectually incurious.
This is damning no matter how you look at it.
September 3, 2008 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is so specific it is obviously written by someone who knows her.
Some of the statements have already been backed up with facts, i.e., the precipitous firing of the librarian and the Police Chief, and the hiring of a city admininstrator.
The information regarding the increase in the town's budget during her tenure and the sports center have already been published.
Actually, Sarah Palin sounds a lot like George Bush -- loyalty first, brooks no dissent and intellectually incurious.
This is damning no matter how you look at it.
September 3, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM - this is huge, but you need attribution. Can you contact the author and get permission? The country needs to know this is the real deal. This wonderful housewife with courage and conviction to do the right thing should be lauded by all who value a key foundation of Democracy - an informed voting populace. We need her information, but for it to be valued by the people who will be rightfully skeptical, we need her to stand behind her words identifying herself.
September 3, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM - this is huge, but you need attribution. Can you contact the author and get permission? The country needs to know this is the real deal. This wonderful housewife with courage and conviction to do the right thing should be lauded by all who value a key foundation of Democracy - an informed voting populace. We need her information, but for it to be valued by the people who will be rightfully skeptical, we need her to stand behind her words identifying herself.
September 3, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM - this is huge, but you need attribution. Can you contact the author and get permission? The country needs to know this is the real deal. This wonderful housewife with courage and conviction to do the right thing should be lauded by all who value a key foundation of Democracy - an informed voting populace. We need her information, but for it to be valued by the people who will be rightfully skeptical, we need her to stand behind her words identifying herself.
September 3, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM - this is huge, but you need attribution. Can you contact the author and get permission? The country needs to know this is the real deal. This wonderful housewife with courage and conviction to do the right thing should be lauded by all who value a key foundation of Democracy - an informed voting populace. We need her information, but for it to be valued by the people who will be rightfully skeptical, we need her to stand behind her words identifying herself.
September 3, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone Snoped this?
September 3, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I've read portions of this before, on various website comments sections (probably ADR). I mean, I read this stuff last Friday when Palin was first announced. It leads me to believe one of two things:
1) It's a fabrication, consisting of bits that have been cobbled together from ADR chat boards, or
2) It's one person's manifesto, that has evolved over the past week, but is what it reports to be: an account by someone who knows Sarah Palin.
I have to say, I'm a little bit skeptical.
September 3, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The e-mail itself has been validate by a conservative blogger who wanted it to be a hoax, but who was able to get in direct contact with its author." -- from my first paragraph.
Here is the link again:
href="http://fairlyconservative.com/the-race-for-president/a-chat-with-anne-kilkenny-from-alaska/
September 3, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a great start for any investigative journalist that wants to validate the pieces of the puzzle. Somebody has to be willing to go on the record.
September 3, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, this will not get very widespread distribution and likely won't reach the 15% or so of truly undecideds. Too bad, it's fairly obvious she is a Bush Republican, where ideology and party affiliation trumps all and truth & accountability are something to be spun.
September 3, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can't continue to treat people as described and not have it catch up to you eventually. If this account is accurate, sooner or later this detrimental info on Palin will come out. Let's hope it's sooner (read prior to November) rather than later.
September 3, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I`m afraid this is just junk. Even if it was written by the supposed author (and I find that very hard to believe), it smacks of the `concern` emails circulating re: Obama`s suppossed muslim-ness / anti american-ness.
I suppose my hopes for TPM are set a bit high, but, honestly, I thought the posters here were above this. BTW, regardless of who wrote it it reads like it was thrown together by a bunch of political hacks.
My fav part is `Turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores and disconnected parking lots`. Really? Single handedly? That`s quite a feat.
I think a far better line of attack is the ridiculous spin Republicans are putting on Palin - she does not need to be addressed directly - the GOP surrogates are doing the Dems job for them - just see Tucker Bounds get totally pwned by Campbell Brown recently. That sort of thing needs to be pushed to the hilt, not this.
September 3, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
If she's been so awful, how come she has such high approval ratings in Alaska?
September 4, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hosted a full, readable version of this and linked to it at dailykos, talkleft, and mydd early Tuesday morning.
There is a lot of interest in this letter, as my page holding it received almost 20,000 requests yesterday.
I left the identification in and sourced the Washington Monthly comment area, but it is so hard to find notes within a lot of other comments that I made this informative and rather balanced piece its own page.
That's at http://www.andrys.com/palin-kilkenny.html
Also included is the link to the NY Times article that included brief interviews with many, including the woman who wrote the letter.
And another interesting history at Politico.
September 4, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Have seen parts of this online as well earlier this week. If Anne Kilkenny is indeed the author, and that is whom I saw it attributed to a few days ago as well, a woman by the same name was interviewed briefly on the NBC Nightly News tonight (9/3) I believe on a piece about Wasilla reported by John Larson. It should be pretty easy to verify it is her, and she did put the caveat in the end about the stats. The piece seemed pretty straightforward, and not like she had a major axe to grind. It was not favorable to Palin all in all, but seemed like her honest assessment and didn't froth at the mouth in an attempt to bash her.
September 4, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
NO RECORD OF PALIN 'SON' TRIG BORN ON THE DATE CLAIMED ... THIS IS BRISTOL 2ND PREGNANCY NOT THE 1ST!!!
http://www.mediatakeout.com/2008/26353-more_palin_drama_no_record_of_palin_son_trig_born_on_the_date_claimed__daughter_supposedly_got_pregnant_while_she_had_mono__attempts_to_force_daughter_to_get_married.html
People's children are off limits? This is not about her daughter bristol, no one is attacking her daughter... this is about another GOP corrupt politician who wants to be vice-president or president.
We don't need it... not another 4 or 8 years of lying corrupt president and vice-president.... we had enough of bush and cheney...
"NICE guys finish last!!!".. this is about palin lies and misconduct.
Gov. Palin needs to take a DNA or blood test to prove that baby trig is hers... all the evidence is supporting that the baby belongs to Bristol, her daughter.
I saw pictures and VIDEO of gov. palin when she CLAIMED to be 7 and 8 months pregnant, AND SHE DIDn't look 7 or 8 months preganant to me... I have six children by two different women so I know what a 7 and 8 month pregnant woman looks like. Palin was not pregnant with trig, bristol was.
Bristol is now pregnant a second time or her 2nd pregnancy is a hoax to force her to marry her boyfriend to cover up for gov palin scandal...... faux-lame and biased news channel and other media outlets who support the GOP are trying to cover-up the scandal... and the oabama campaign is too scared to touch the issue cause they are just scared of being called a sexist for busting palin's chops.
NEWS FLASH: A rumor is not a rumor when evidence to support the claim exist... OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE!!!!
September 4, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
daughter taken out of school for 5 months (for mono?) during which period the baby was born. pictures of sarah when she would have been 6 months pregnant shows no bump. no record of delivery on date she claims to have delivered, at hospital where she claimed to have delivered. doctor she claims delivered her baby doesnt even work at the hospital she claims she delivered at. implausible claim that her water broke before giving a speech, which she gave, then flew 11 hours home to alaska rather than seeking immediate medical attention for what she claims she knew was a problem pregnancy. members of her own staff not believing she was pregnant. pictures of her family during that period removed from Alaska website. etc.
stupid internet rumors. you should be ashamed for even considering the facts regarding this, as the children she parades at the convention and in photo ops are "off limits." and of course we know that the (manson)"family values" crowd would have shown Barack the same respect if he had shown up at his convention and put an unwed pregnant teenage daughter and her boyfriend on the stage.
clearly, anyone that would think even for an instant the she may be lying about this just like she lied about her extensive lobbying FOR the "bridge to nowhere" in her first major speech to the american public is clearly a sexist with no respect for family.
nothing interesting to see here, move along people. unless, of course, you think that proof of someone being a pathological liar means they shouldn't be president, or a heartbeat away from the presidency. but that didn't matter in 2004 and it doesn't matter now. case closed?
September 4, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I laugh at all of you who are so down on Gov Palin. I laugh in your face!!!
I laugh, simply because you know that her pick knocked you out of the box. It nullified anything you could say about treatment of women. As far as the experience issue goes, true, she has no foreign policy experience, but neither does Barack Obama, and you want to give him the first seat! At least she has an opportunity to learn before getting thrown into the vortex. Barack will be stuttering from day one. She leads the AK national Guard. She runs a state police force, and is ultimately responsible for all that they do or fail to do. What is Barack responsible for as a "community organizer/state sen/US Sen"? His desk.
Liberals never have anything factual to run on. Personal, vicious, attacks is what they do best, and they are getting a big help from the media on that.
This is a principled woman who will never have to "make things up on the fly". Her life is an opened book, and her principles and values will ensure she says exactly what she means. Barack can't do that because what he means is too far off from what the average American belives. His life is, and if he has his way, will stay a closed book, until he's ready to spring all of that liberal garbage on this great nation of ours.
No way can we let that happen.
September 4, 2008 6:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is about as open a book as the Bush administration!
She has a history of being secretive and twisting facts to fit her version of the story.
Sound familiar?
So what is it that we DON'T know about Obama?? What is it that Mark Penn missed last winter? That, unlike Palin and McCain, he loves his wife & kids?
Pulll-leeeze!
I worked as a reporter in small towns here in PA for 17 years. The dynamics of life and politics in Wasilla - where you have some people who adamantly support her no matter what and those who think she's more human and less saint - is not unusual. In Wrightsville, PA, I covered where the mayor was a minister who is a fed ex-con, and he was openly elected. It took the York County DA to get him thrown out. In the meantime, there was mismanagement, but his supporters refused to see the writing on the wall.
This post seems the real deal to me.
September 4, 2008 8:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I laugh at your trolling, jaycee. My belly shakes with mirth at your strained logic. I giggle at your hyperbole (it's a word, look it up). I guffaw at your exclamation points. And now, through the power of the internet, "I laugh in your face!!!"
September 4, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama article in Foreign Affairs Magazine July 2007
His grasp on foreign policy is amazing. It is a far cry from Mrs. "I want to know what the VP does?" Sarah Palin.
And btw, her being in charge of the Alaska National Guard????? What?????
and this
September 4, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
If even half of this is true, it's pretty damning if anyone picks it up. Don't expect it to get the same attention as Corsi's blatant smear of Obama.
She's Dick Cheney with charm.
Don't let McCain be the next national nightmare.
September 4, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Palin has so much Administration experience, why then, did she have to hire a City Administrater?
Also, what about the state run dairy farm? We need to investigate that.
She sounds just like Bush, most likely even worse!
Having a black list, appointing inexperienced cronies, taking credit for other peoples ideas, lying in the face of evidence to the contrary, abuse of power, censorship, I bet the list is a whole lot longer!
I don't know about you but I am so sick and tired of these phony mothers trying to legislate my life. Smaller goverment is supposed to be a GOP platform.
Her stupid, unproven Pro-life issues did not work with her own child, how does she get off trying to tell us what is good for our children?
Also, the issue of Bristol and Levi are supposed to be off. Well, why then, does she keep parading them around for the world to see? If she had any respect for her family, she would not put them on the news everyday!
I am so disgusted with the GOP, this campaign is worse than Bush's was. Not because of the Dems, they have been very good about sticking to the issues. Speaking of issues, the GOP has not talked about any of them except for Pro-life crap.
The GOP has brought all this upon themselves. Thank God for it!!!!
September 4, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I also heard that the kids didn't know anything about Mom running for veep until just an HOUR before the announcement.
Makes you really wonder where this "babe's" priorities lie...
September 4, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
an anonymous letter? have we come to this?
September 4, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most of us have been frustrated from time to time because we felt that Obama has not hit back hard enough against the smears and distortions of the McCain Campaign. However, he continues to march on taking the high road and maintaining a lead, if even a slight one. As I look at the two campaigns, I am beginning to feel better about the Obama strategy. I think the McCain Campaign is becomeing so distasteful that only the hardcore right and the racists will cling to the GOP. I think Obama will pick up the rest of the electorate as well as his newly expanded based of young energized voters. The difference is so stark between the two campaigns. I am hopeful that the debates will further illuminate the rationality of Obama as opposed to the insulting obsurdity of McCain.
September 4, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
More from another Alaskan..and a respected journalist. You think cronyism and nepotism is bad? Oooh we haven't heard the last in what happens to people who are not "loyal Palinites".
Defy them as the risk of losing your job. That includes close friends of theirs:
http://www.andrewhalcro.com/shadow_governor
September 4, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment