Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

A Question I'm Evidently Not Allowed To Ask

One of the items that Steve Schmidt finds to be afoul of his
brand-spanking new standards of decency is a question that a reporter
allegedly asked him (umm, off the record) about whether Sarah Palin had
her amniotic fluid tested.

This question got lumped in with all
of the other manufactured outrage about supposed attacks on Bristol,
but I think it is entirely different and legitimate.  This question is
the first thing that came to mind for me when as part of her official
bio, the fact came to light that she chose to have her last baby even
after discovering that he would be afflicted with Down's Syndrome. 

You
see, when my wife and I were meeting with the OBGYN who would
eventually deliver our daughter, we discovered through a blood test
(AFP) that we had an elevated risk of our child having Down's.  We
asked the next sensible question, which was - can we find out for
sure?  We were told, accurately as I understand, that the only way to
confirm Down's syndrome was by amniosintesis, a process by which a
needle is inserted into the uterus and a sample of the fluid is
extracted, then tested.  Our doctor then told us, VERY CLEARLY, that
while it was our decision, the procedure carried risks for the baby. 
The bottom line was that unless we were entertaining the possibility of
aborting the pregnancy, this procedure was an unnecessary risk.

My questions to Sarah Palin on this subject are as follows: 

1. 
Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your
religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the
possibility of an abortion? 

2.  How do you reconcile the fact
that you claim to have "chosen" to carry the baby to term inspite of
Down's with the fact that you do not believe that "choice" exists at
all?

3.  You made this choice for yourself, do you not believe that others should be able to choose as well?

Also,
I should add, in our case we elected not to take the risk of an
amniosintesis, and my daughter (now three) is not afflicted with
Down's, a fact that I am very thankful for. 

I'll also add,
for the purposes of disclosure, that I am male, christian but not
over-the-top, and I am staunchly pro-life and staunchly pro-choice. 
What I mean is that in any case where my opinion is asked, I will
always advise against abortion but I also recognize that in the vast
majority of cases, MY OPINION IS NOT ASKED, and I should leave those
people alone to make the most difficult decision of their lives in
peace. 


Comments (5)

Excellent.

You've made an interesting point and on worth asking but only if she opens the door and uses her experiences this year to shore up her "pro-life" street cred; otherwise it's probably too personal really.

Except for the wording of your question #1, I think you have good questions.

1. Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the possibility of an abortion?

Amniocentesis is performed for a variety of reasons. The American Pregnancy Association's website has a list of reasons for and against making the decision to have an amniocentesis procedure done. Some people opt for the procedure if they are at risk for having a special needs baby, and the test helps in determining whether fetal surgery is needed to address other birth defects, such as spina bifida. Also, the test helps by providing advance notice to parents who need preparation/planning time to deal with a special needs infant.

Except for the wording of your question #1, I think you have good questions.

1. Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the possibility of an abortion?

Amniocentesis is performed for a variety of reasons. The American Pregnancy Association's website has a list of reasons for and against making the decision to have an amniocentesis procedure done. Some people opt for the procedure if they are at risk for having a special needs baby, and the test helps in determining whether fetal surgery is needed to address other birth defects, such as spina bifida. Also, the test helps by providing advance notice to parents who need preparation/planning time to deal with a special needs infant.

I like your "pro-choice, pro-life" formulation.
The vast majority of "pro-choice" people probably would as well.
There are a lot of questions Sarah Palin needs to answer, which she is trying her damndest not to answer.
But I think anything about her reproduction decisions -- repeat, ANYTHING -- should be off limits.
If you believe in a woman's right to choose, that's it. She gets to choose, and nobody has a right to second-guess her.
End of controversy. End of story.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address