« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Unity '08
I knew that John McCain was devious, but I didn't realize just how devious. I have just learned from a credible source, who has asked not to be named because he's not a real person, who McCain plans to select as a running mate. I'll give you some hints:
- years of experience at the highest levels of government
- substantial economic and foreign policy expertise
- swing state associations
- appeals to working class voters
- endorsed by key conservative leaders
- appeals to moderate Democrats and disaffected Clinton supporters
- combat experience
Yes, John McCain intends to select Hillary Clinton as his running mate. She'll release her convention delegates all right...to McCain. Theirs will be the new Unity ticket. In an unprecedented strategy, her loyal delegates intend to write in John McCain at the convention. The Democratic National Convention doesn't permit write-ins, but Hillary intends to convene an emergency session of the Rules and Bylaws Committee to push through the changes. If she doesn't succeed, her delegates plan to write McCain's name on paper airplanes and throw them at Barack Obama which is bound to alarm the Secret Service and result in the ejection of elected delegates, ultimately causing a convention riot not seen since supporters of Teddy Roosevelt spit goobers at William Taft in 1912. The paper airplanes also offer subtle homage to McCain's experience as a naval pilot.
This news was as flabbergasting to me as I'm sure that it is to you. But in retrospect, it makes too much sense to be false. This strategy has obviously been planned since at least March, when Clinton compared McCain favorably to Obama, arguing that the latter had not crossed "the commander-in-chief threshold." It also explains why she spent so much time attacking Obama and so little time attacking McCain. And the gas tax holiday proposals championed by McCain and Clinton were clearly coordinated to put pressure on Obama. Finally, in light of the news, it's obvious that McCain's recent ads appealing to Clinton supporters are not cynical attempts to manipulate angry Clinton supporters, they're the first stages of a joint campaign.
Skeptics will argue that Clinton is far too liberal for most Republicans, who spent years demonizing her, but key right-wing leaders have warmed to Clinton in the last few months. She has been endorsed by Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulture, and Richard Mellon Scaife, and my source tells me that Chuck Norris has already been working for the ticket behind the scenes. Scaife's private lunch with Hillary was likely an early strategy session, and Limbaugh's Operation Chaos was certainly meant to prepare his conservative ground troops for the fall campaign. Furthermore, everyone knows that unlike Democrats, Republicans will put aside their differences and vote for their nominee in the end. Finally, as most pundits have noted, this election is not about policy; it's about personality. Polls show that Clinton and McCain supporters have a natural affinity for one another's candidates and share a mutual intense hatred for Barack Obama. Most voters will happily toss aside their cherished principles in favor of a sticking it to the One.
As an Obama supporter, this development is obviously of great concern to me, but I also feel a sense of relief. Democratic unity has seemed so strained and artificial. Putting the Obama critics together behind the one candidate draws the political division where it belongs. The U.S. is not red and blue anymore, it's black and white. So unleash the blogs of war, it's time to get angry again.














Comments (44)
Whoo-eee!
August 25, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Skeptics will argue that Clinton is far too liberal for most Republicans
---------------------------------------------------
This is really a simple problem to solve. When McCain withdraws due to age and health issues that leaves Hillary at the top of the republican ticket. She'll immediately pick Biden as her running mate. Biden's work over several years to pass and overwhelming support for the bankruptcy bill will give her the cred she needs with conservative republicans.
August 25, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heh. Good snark, oceankat.
August 25, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ooh, better idea: she could pick Obama, thus allowing him to take his rightful place in line after her.
Ooh, better better idea: she could pick Bill, thus allowing him to take his rightful place in line before her and after her.
Oh, the possibilities are limitless.
August 25, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, might as well go for broke!
August 25, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ann Coulture - the well-dressed right wing harpy?
August 25, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ann Coulture - the well-dressed right-wing harpy?
August 25, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha!!!
August 26, 2008 3:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem Hillary poses for the Republican ticket is that she would energize the party's base - that is, the liberal base of the Democratic party. So-called Clearthinker and Jade724369872 have been secretly salivating over the prospect of a McCain Clinton ticket for some time and already have their attack ads in production.
August 25, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? Who?
August 25, 2008 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm flattered to be in your thoughts. I must have made quite an impression. Most democrats know that there is no reason to see the world as blacks and whites --
-- until discussing their candidates.
August 26, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, ?enghis. This is not a funny joke. Nor is it remotely likely or worth divisiveness. Please name your "credible" source.
I am disappointed in this post.
August 25, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Snark.
August 25, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Genghis,
I'm one of your biggest, best fans, as you know. Usually your humor is the perfect prescription for what ails us when infighting breaks out and things get too tense here at TPM.
But I think the mood here is too raw for this one to work. That's right -- for the first time, I think you have a bomb post. For some reason, lots of us seem to be taking the bait on this and allowing ourselves to become distracted by a mostly contrived narrative about a continuing feud between the Clintons and Obama.
Please give it another try in a day or two. Maybe the atmosphere here will be right for one of your most excellent posts.
August 25, 2008 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe it's a fake Genghis. His evil twin.
Or not.
August 25, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch. Bwafat's support notwithstanding, this is what I hereby dub "dark snark." The purpose is to highlight the absurdity of the Obama-Clinton rivalry (on all sides), not to make you laugh. That's not to say that it's not a bomb, just that humor should not be the measure of its bombaciousness.
August 25, 2008 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I understand the subtlety you distinguish and assure you I'm a huge fan of "dark snark" (great term) forms of pointing out absurdity.
I hope I didn't insult you -- that wasn't my intent. I totally got what you were aiming for -- I just think the general mood at TPM Cafe is so totally f*cked up right now that you may not see the usual enthusiastic response you're accustomed to.
-------------
And to LisB -- this is not meant to discourage Ghengis -- in fact, I want him to post again soon. He comes through with perspective and sanity when we need it!
August 25, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
No worries. Not insulted. I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation.
August 25, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's Bwakfat.
August 25, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, does Bwakfat have some meaning? I googled it, but all I got was "Did you mean breakfast?" Plus a bunch of hits for comments by you.
August 25, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwakfat has a meaning, yes.
No, I am not a breakfast food..
Thank you for your interest, I'm not really all that terribly interesting.
--bwak
August 26, 2008 5:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hit: Spell it backwards.
August 26, 2008 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, it's sideways, as in ewewhon spelled sideways is "nowhere""
Thanks for playing, though.
August 26, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
No way baby. "Dark Snark" is doing a post full of Canadian jokes while I'M AWAY! Hello? Eh?
Scallops were great, by the way. Got some nice wineries coming along too. Go North Young Man! ;-)
August 25, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
No that's "Dark Snark Eh." A subtle but important difference. Thanks for the suggestion but, I'm not legally allowed to enter Canada.
August 25, 2008 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's funny.
August 25, 2008 9:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also found it amusing. I don't think humor, nor snarky humor, should ever be told to "hold off".
I'm sure Lenny Bruce, John Belushi, Richard Pryor, and many others would agree.
If not for humor, we'd stop smiling. And what fun would that be?
August 25, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's already ruined the convention by releasing her delegates. They're running around the Invesco Center and are getting into everything. They're totally loose!
August 25, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy crap!! Break out the cattle prods!
August 25, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone has shit on their shoes.
August 26, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eww! Loose shit, at that.
August 26, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
You owe me a new keyboard and some antibiotics to clear up a now inevitable sinus infection.
August 26, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary initially resisted the lure of a McCain/Clinton ticket, but ultimately this serenade broke through her steely resolve.
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=9rOF-j1L0vE&NR=1
August 26, 2008 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
You just led me down a deep dark hole where McCain's head took on .... new life.
Man, I'll bet McCain regrets that green-jello speech! I remember Colbert issuing the challenge - but I'd never seen any of the results. Damn funny videos!
August 26, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually McCain has no say in his VP pick.
The dark GOP overlords will be telling little Johnny McMansion who will be his VP.
August 26, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, testing the timeless question: will reductio ad absurdium work on an arguement had already long since been reduced to the absurd?
August 26, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
reductio reductio ad absurdium absurdium?
August 26, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
If I were a betting man, I'd bet on Nope.
August 26, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I, Hillary Clinton, your future president after the media discovers John McCain actually passed away three years ago (I'm just saying that Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June), thank you for your endorsement.
You, and the billions of voters like you, who will vote for John McCain, are actually voting for me. You know, John McCain has crossed the Vietnamese sniper-fire dodging threshold, and I too have crossed the sniper-fire dodging threshold. So the real question you should be asking yourself this election cycle is who do YOU want dodging sniper fire at 3am?
Much Love,
McCain/Hillary -> Hillary '08.
August 26, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been saying all along that Hillary and Obama each have more pledged delegates than McCain. It should be Hillary v. Obama in the general election.
For as much as I hated the primary season, I've got to think that would be awesome.
August 26, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
My how you've grown
August 26, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's just one problem with selecting Clinton as McCain's VP.
Clinton's never been a POW.
August 26, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're so wrong.
August 26, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
She had the keys to the door and could have left anytime she wanted.
August 26, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment