« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Shelf Life of John McCain's Honor
My father was a career military officer, so pardon me if I don't genuflect at self-important, self-serving mentions of our "brave men and women in uniform," too often invoked by those who never served, or never knew anyone who did, or who fought like hell and worked every angle not to, and would riot in the streets if the US instituted a sensible draft that offered their rich, pampered little boys and girls the same opportunities to die and lose limbs with which we honor our all-volunteer force.
Being familiar with the military, I also feel no need to lionize everyone who's been in it. There are fools in uniform. The conduct of several of our recent wars proves that. There are also heroes, knaves, psychos, savants, mensches, thieves, rapists and every other type of man and woman you can name. Their motives for service can range from patriotism to political opportunism to desperation. Donning a uniform does not make them better people. It just makes them soldiers.
John McCain served in Vietnam. He was shot down, imprisoned and tortured. He endured a great deal, and a big hat-tip to him for coming out of it sane and strong enough to live a life. However, he does not get a pass on despicable hypocrisy, demented race-baiting, and outright lies because he served in Vietnam and suffered as a POW. To suggest that he should is to suggest that, likewise, Louisiana Congressman William Jefferson should get a pass on bribery and racketeering charges because he was raised black and poor in the racist south. Despicable behavior is just that. Your past does not excuse it.
I am violently sick of the media dancing around this increasingly dishonorable man's outrageous sense of entitlement with which he justifies his campaign's outright lies, half-truths and transparent obfuscations.
NPR's Renee Montagne began to ask McCain about his campaign tactics and he grouchily protested, "We're not sending any negative message in our campaign. We're drawing differences in positions between myself and Sen. Obama, which are significant."
Countering that statement, Montagne asked the McCain about the TV ad blaming Obama for high gas prices. McCain stuck to his non-sensical talking points:
I believe strongly that if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. And he voted for the energy bill that had all kind of tax breaks and giveaways for the oil companies. I believe if you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. And it's a big problem in America today.
On the same day that statement aired, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman lambasted McCain for failing to even to show up for a crucial vote on extending tax credits for solar and other energy efficient systems.
Friedman wrote:
In fact, John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year -- which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldn't leave his office to vote.
Yes, Senator Straight Talk, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem--and bald-faced hypocrisy is a problem.
McCain stated that he is "not sending any negative message" in his campaign. This is the same man who all but accused Obama of treason by stating, "It seems to me that Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign."
If that's not negative, then I suppose it is equally "positive" to say that John McCain is willing to needlessly sacrifice American service men and women's lives in order to win the presidency.
"
I am proud of the campaign I am running," McCain says.
Mitt Romney, official campaign surrogate and leading candidate for McCain's Vice President is heading the race-stained charge against Barack's patriotism and Americanness. He told Fox News that, "I think John McCain is going to make sure that America stays America."
McCain will ensure that America stays as white as Romney wants it to be. (He, of the church that has never actually repudiated the theological notion that black skin is the result of a curse from God; he who approached a black child wearing a necklace and said, "Oh, you've got some bling-bling here.")
Among McCain's most disgraceful lines of attack is the suggestion that dark-skinned Obama is somehow less American than the white-skinned. McCain savaged Michelle Obama for acknowledging the personal affects of America's racial history on black Americans. He trotted out his wife Cindy to mewl that she's always been proud of her country. Yes, and she's always been rich and white, too.
"I am not sending any negative message in this campaign," McCain says.
McCain has run the notorious "celebrity" ad linking Obama to two highly sexualized, blonde white women, conjuring the salacious historical distaste for black men who soil the purity of white American womanhood.
"I am proud of the campaign I am running," he says.
In response to Obama's suggestion that Americans should encourage children to learn more than one language, McCain surrogate Rudolph Guiliani stated, "this is why he's such a popular candidate in Europe; because there's such an anti-American feeling there... he's sort of capturing that."
There it is again: "Anti-American."
McCain adviser Charlie Black stated, "We don't want to talk about his [Obama's] patriotism and character. We concede that he's a patriot and a person of good character."
Note the wording. He doesn't "believe." He "concedes." You only "concede" a debatable point. Even in this statement, the McCain camp opens the door for a vicious campaign using Obama's race to tar him as too "exotic," or "different," or "un-American," or just too damned black to be President.
"I am not sending any negative message in this campaign," McCain says. "I am proud of the campaign I am running."
Over 30 years ago, McCain served with honor. He shed that honor like a snake's spent skin somewhere between then and now. What's left is a dishonorable shell of a man, willing to pick the scab of this nation's oldest and most traumatic wound in order to win the high office to which he seems to feel he has a God-given right--so much so that he is justified in resorting to repellent tactics in order to win it.
John McCain is a dishonorable liar who once honorably wore a uniform. To hide his lies behind his medals dishonors not only the service he claims to prize--the one my father served all of his life--but also the country he seeks to lead.














Comments (29)
This is damning:
In fact, John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year -- which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldn't leave his office to vote.
August 14, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
It SHOULD be damning, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for anyone in the msm to ask him about it. Renee Montaigne could have asked follow-up questions many times, but she challenged him, let him give a fake platitude of a non-answer, and then went on to the next question.
They played a self-described "former Hillary backer" at a McCain town meeting. The guy asked McCain what he would do to help young people go to college. The answer was this: "If you study certain fields -- science, math, etc -- WE'LL FIND WAYS OF HELPING YOU STAY IN SCHOOL"
That is the kind of bull-shit answer that passes for John McCain's policies!!!!!!!!! It is appalling!
NPR called the kid and asked if he had made up his mind, and the kid said that now he knows more about McCain and so he's leaning that way, but he will find out more about what Obama will do and make his mind up in the time that's left.
The pathetic screw-ball that is McCain gets a pass for every one of his ridiculous statements, and people like that kid don't even know how to think!
August 14, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Precisely. McCain calls Obama an empty suit, but it's McCain who has no substance. Amazing how our press corps papers over this.
August 14, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
In this respect he's like Slimy Norman (Quimby) Coleman: Calling him an "empty suit" is an insult to clothing everywhere.
August 14, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "him" is, of course, McCain. (Realizing that it was an easily misinterpretable reference, just a bit late...)
August 14, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good to see "msm" instead of "MSM"...I've started using that regularly since they obviously do not deserve to be seen as "upper case"
August 14, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Larry, you are right on about McCain and the despicable campaign he is running. I am so sick of the media fawning over McCain, and assuming his honor is intact, despite what his campaign might be doing. Let's keep pushing this until they pick it up. I have been emailing and forwarding links to McCain's "honorable" campaign tactics for the past few weeks, and have opened a couple eyes to his true character...
August 14, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still hung up on the 'war hero' part.
Doesn't a war hero's story start with "I penetrated enemy lines and then captured a machine gun nest. I turned it on their flank and soon, I had captured an entire regiment."
John McCain's war hero story starts with "I was shot down, then captured, then tortured."
Jesus suffered public torture and crucifixion - that doesn't mean he was war hero.
How about the Gitmo or Abu Graihb prisoners? Are they "ready to lead" becasue they were tortured, just like McCain?
August 14, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
You reference two separate issues, from my point of view.
I have absolutely no problem with any soldier who is captured in the line of duty and endures any torture (much less five years of it) being called a war hero. I can't imagine what the pain was like, I can see the long-term physical effects of McCain's war experience on him now, and I am grateful that I'll likely never know either infirmity.
Having said that, I completely agree that being a war hero has NOTHING to do with being "Ready To Lead" in the political arena. In fact, there are studies showing that Vietnam POWs have shorter life spans and more volatile behavior as a result of that experience. So, we are in 100% agreement there.
August 14, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I agree with what Eastside says (to a point) about soldier's getting captured deserving credit and respect for surviving the situation, I'm not quite sure I would use "hero" as a blanket descriptor. I think there are individuals who, while captured, lead their fellow soldiers, attempt escape, and to other things that might be described as actions above and beyond the call of duty.
But isn't getting captured a failed mission? I mean the most recent case of "hero worship" we've had is that of Jessica Lynch, the Little Girl Hero, whose storyline was fabricated by the Army. Does the fact that she was injured, captured and then "rescued" make her ready to lead, commander-in-chief material?
I agree that the narrative about McCain's service has some problems. Being a war prisoner does accord one special recognition, but does not automatically qualify you as commander-in-chief.
August 14, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see your point, Jade. Of course, I think we both agree (as we separately stated) that heroism, regardless of your definition of "hero", doesn't relate to being ready for the Presidency.
To expound upon my view a bit, any prisoner of war, to my mind, has undertaken action above and beyond the call of duty for his/her country. From what I've read, you can't really train a soldier for the physical suffering McCain endured.
I don't think Wes Clark had any problem with calling McCain a war hero. Clark's point was that McCain's Vietnam experiences didn't prepare him to lead a nation. That point is completely correct. Moreover, the finer political advantage of that distinction here is this: you give McCain credit for being a war hero, thus taking away any crying about attacking McCain's character, while simultaneously drawing the bright line between war service and governing ability.
McCain can't afford that line, because his war service is the only credential he has that survives any sort of scrutiny.
August 14, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
LG,
Thank you, for having the courage to say this.
A couple of nights ago Hannity was trying to excuse McCain's adultery while his wife at that time was hospitalized by citing his POW experience. This right-wing hypocrisy must be stopped.
Obama should have let Wes Clark continue with his oblique challenge to McCain's warrior saint image.
It can only be done effectively by someone with military credibility.
Rec'd, big time.
August 14, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, I would have loved to let Wesley Clark continue to hammer McCain. Also, I don't think it was necessary for Obama to repudiate Clark.
My guess is, Obama figured it was the only way to publicly divorce himself from those sentiments (with which I imagine he agrees in private).
As a result, I've come to believe that part of Obama's strategy is to not give McCain any additional platforms to bring up his military service. Any day spent discussing military background is a good day for McCain, and Obama probably wants to take that edge away from him.
August 14, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very, very powerful post. Thank you. I have a brother who has spent the last 35 years in uniform and he is pro Obama all the way. Military personnel know a good leader when they see one.
August 14, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
GREAT, GREAT post! Highly rec'd!
I, too, wish that Wesley Clark had not been silenced. He was spot on and that discussion should have been allowed to run its course.
If John McCain gets a pass on his adultery because it happened 30 years ago, he should also have to pass on his "hero" status...it's even further in the past, and he's acting like anything other than a hero now...
August 14, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
RE "oldest and most traumatic wound": I might be willing to grant that racism and the legacy of slavery is our "most traumatic wound". Heck, I even go so far as to say that I agree with it wholeheartedly. But "oldest"? I'm sorry, I can't buy that. The conquest of the Americas by Europe is far and away our "oldest" social wound, mitigated in the USA only by the fact that we darn near wiped out all the natives on "our" land, so we are rarely, if ever, confronted with the brutal legacy of "Manifest Destiny".
August 14, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, by the way, other than that little nit, SUPER post. Just super.
August 14, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spot on!
August 14, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed! Few surrogates have spoken out since the Clark smack down and I've wondered if they are afraid to speak or have been told not to. Obama needs some defenders now and he's not getting them. He simply can't do it alone with ads, IMO.
August 14, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen!
August 14, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post, highly recommended!
While I would cetainly says that anyone who has been a POW deserves our respect and sympathy, I don't think it makes one a war hero, if anything, McCain is a war survivor, unlike the 58,000 American men and women who didn't get to come home from Vietnam.
August 14, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, thanks for calling this exactly what it is and who McCain is - a washed up nobody..
August 14, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Leonce, this is a first-rate paragraph, and it really cuts to the heart of the issue. Good parallel to Rep. Jefferson, too. Rec'd.
August 14, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is not alone...
according to the Center for Responsive Politics, military members are contributing more to the Obama campaign than the McCain campaign. Troops who are currently deployed have contributed more to the Obama campaign by a margin of 6-1.
It's one thing for an old soldier running for public office who served his country with honor to talk in vague terms about supporting the troops - but let's instead take a look at who our troops currently in harm's way trust to be their next commander in chief.
August 14, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
What an amazing post. I can't recommend it enough. You say the things I have wanted to say for so long. I think this post needs to be read by a wider audience than simply what's found here at TPM, and I would encourage you to post it elsewhere. People need to see McCain for who and what he's become.
One common misconception that some people seem to have is that just because McCain was once an honorable man, it does not make him one now. Some people refuse to see the changes that have taken place between then and now. But people like you don't, and you deserve much credit for it. Thank you.
August 14, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama did not serve his country at all. He was not shot down, nor imprisoned and tortured. He endured an Ivy league Education, paid for by taxpayers. He joined a Racist Church and is an egomaniac. He had a convicted felon help him buy his house. However, he does get a pass on despicable hypocrisy, demented race-baiting, and outright lies because he is black. His buddy Louisiana Congressman William Jefferson should not get a pass on bribery and racketeering charges because his Despicable behavior is just that. Oilbama is a scumbag and his past does not excuse it. Oilbama is in the pocket of big Oil and voted for his buddy Dick Cheney's Energy Bill, his only accomplishment in his short time in Senate.
August 15, 2008 8:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dem BillC does not serve his country at all by spewing every hate-filled Republican smear and talking point in an attempt to defame Obama.
August 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is he billy the kid? Don't respond to his stuff. It just makes him post more. He probably makes a big 25 cents every time he gets a response at this site from the McThusela camp.
August 15, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
"McThusela"
I like it!
August 15, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment