« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The shattered glass ceiling: welcome, ladies, to the world of full-contact politics
The much quoted line from Hillary Clinton’s non-concession speech, “We’ve put 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling” has been so much quoted that it’s now a tiresome cliché. Sarah Palin, however, put a fresh fillip on the line when she claimed that with her selection as McCain’s VP candidate, now the glass ceiling has been shattered.
And yet, some commentators have observed that McCain has laid a clever trap for the Obama campaign: to wit, if they’re too tough on Palin it will backfire because she’s a…woman. Obama seemed to have sensed this with his overly gracious acknowledgement of her candidacy.
But wait a minute, something doesn’t compute. If you’ve shattered the glass ceiling, doesn’t that mean you’re now playing with the big boys in the big leagues? Well, guess what? The big boys play rough sometimes. McCain pokes Obama in the eye or Obama kicks McCain in the shins, rhetorically of course, and no one gives it a second thought.
What happens if Joe Biden slices and dices Palin in a debate, which he is perfectly capable of doing? Is that playing too rough? Why should it be any different than if he sliced and diced a male VP candidate? Should a woman from the rugged outdoors who likes to fish and hunt be handled with kid gloves because she’s a…woman?
Hillary Clinton wore her toughness like a badge in the latter stages of the Democratic primary. And yet when the chips were really, really down, at what might have been the darkest moment in her campaign, she turned on the faucets on the eve of the New Hampshire primary and sniffled about how “tough” things were to an audience of misty-eyed women. And it worked.
So what’s it going to be? If women want so much to be admitted to the locker room, to the playing fields where the big boys play full contact politics, shouldn’t they just buckle their chinstraps and be willing to accept the same hits?
Why can’t the Obama campaign produce commercials that showcase the quotes from Alaskan newspapers and Palin’s fellow Alaska Republicans that label her an unqualified lightweight? Because she’s a…woman? Would that further outrage the disgruntled Hillary supporters who are either on the fence or leaning toward, God help us, McCain? Geraldine Ferraro, spokesperson for the disgruntled legions, said that the only reason the under-qualified, inexperienced Obama displaced Hillary was because he was a man. Memo to Geraldine: the only reason McCain put the under-qualified, inexperienced Palin on the ticket is because she’s a…woman.
Nancy Pelosi, conversely, has been playing in the big leagues for a long time; And, to her credit, Pelosi told Clinton and her supporters during the primary, in effect, to stop whining and get over it.
The Obama campaign should be able to go after Palin as aggressively as they would a man. Women can’t have it both ways. If you want admittance to the men’s locker room, be prepared to get your ass snapped with a towel. And don’t whine about it.








Comments (5)
Personally the fact that she CAN'T be attacked should be an insult to women and is sexist. Seh should be treated like any male VP and should not be given a pass. THAT is equality.
August 31, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I WISH I HAD DONE SPELL CHECK AND WAS AS ELEGANT AND RIGHT ON AS YOU WERE.
THIS IS THE WAY IT IS...OBAMA ACTED LIKE A SCHOOL BOY GUSHING OVER SARAH. I AM FURIOUS ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS TOSSIG AWAY THIS LONG HARD FIGHT FOR THE NOMINATION BY ACTING LIKE SCHOOLBOYS. COME ON JOE IT IS UP T YOU!
August 31, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
With a nickname "Sarah Barracuda", I don't think she's a newcomer to full-contact politics. Keep thinking "it's only a bunny".
August 31, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin got her nickname playing in Alaska small school high school sports. She's only a big "barracuda" in a very small pond.
August 31, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the approach the Obama campaign should take:
"We are pleased to see that 25 years after the Democratic party selected a woman as its vice-presidential nominee, that the Republican party has finally decided to follow suit.
"We are looking forward to the debate between our nominee, Joe Biden and Sarah Palin. Joe will debate Sarah no differently than he would have debated Tom Ridge, Mitt Romney, Joe Lieberman, Tim Pawlenty, who made John McCain's short list, and any of the other highly qualified Republicans who didn't like Governors Bob Riley, Jodi Rell, Charlie Crist, sonny Perdue, Linda Lingle, Butch Otter, Mitch Daniels, Bobby Jindal, Haley Barbour, Matt Blunt, Dave Heineman, Jim Gibbons, John Hoeven, Don Carcieri, Mark Sanford, Mike Rounds, Rick Perry, Jon Huntsman, Jim Douglas."
"If Sarah Palin is ready to compete for the second-most important job in the country, she should be able to do so without any special dispensation or consideration because of her gender."
Remind Republicans of the all the other qualified Republican McCain didn't pick, and set up a "no whining zone" right away. Variations on this statement can be a listing of qualified Republican women, former Republican candidates, past and present, Republicans big-city mayors and the like. I'd pound away on her inexperience -- not in comparison to Barack -- but to her Republican brothers and sisters.
Second, I'd create an ad -- or let the DNC create -- the Democratic version of "Passed Over."
August 31, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment