Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Hillary Speech: Silence is Golden

She did a great job, yes yes. And yes, some holdouts will be holdouts and neither she nor Obama can do much about that.

But what Clinton didn't say is as important as what she did, and her silence says to me: I'm going to rally my former supporters but do little else for the next 3 months.

Ask yourself this: what in Hillary's speech could be used to counteract McCain's attack ads right now? In other words, the Obama campaign needs her to basically "take back" everything she said in the primaries. This way, the campaign could edit it and put it out on air to stem the McCain onslaught. She needed to say tonight: "Obama is ready to be commander in chief and will keep you safe. Obama is a patriot. I know Barack Obama and he is an honorable man."

She didn't do that tonight. She held back, again. Hillary offered little reason to support Obama "the person" just Obama "the Democrat." But it's Obama, the person, who could lose in November. Everyone knows he's a Democrat. Obama's biggest challenge has always been himself -- his resume, "otherness," etc. -- and, well, she didn't vouch for him.

I'm being picky. I KNOW! But as of now the biggest threat Sen. Clinton is to the Obama campaign isn't her words now, or her supporters, it's her words 8 months ago.

Of course, Clinton knows this. She knows her attacks from earlier this year still sting (we're still talking about 3 A.M.!) And I'm beginning to believe Michael Gerson when he says that her refusal to vouch for Obama -- the person -- tonight is her "silent revenge." Now I see why she's smiling. On to 2012!

Note -- I'm not a Hillary-hater, nor have I ever been. I actually like and respect her, but I'm also skeptical, and I wonder about what she doesn't say sometimes, as much as what she does say. Just to let you know where I stand.


Comments (19)

You know, one of the things about tonight that gets my goat is that if Terry McCauliff (sorry, butchered that spelling) is to be believed, Hillary has been out campaigning for Obama in at least 3-4 states...If that is true, why isn't the msm reporting it? I think they love hyping the discord.

I'm ready to give her the benefit of the doubt, and for me that's HUGE!

avatar

That's good, its nice to know where people stand.

You're right, the things Hillary said are hurting Obama. Its not that there were attacks in this primary season that's hurting him though. In every hard fought primary candidates have attacked one another. Had Hillary won Obama's attacks would have hurt her. Hart's attacks hurt Mondale, Bradley's hurt Gore.

There's a reason Hillary's hurt more. Because they ring so true. Because Obama has no good answer for them, no good comeback.

You're right, "Obama's biggest challenge has always been himself -- his resume, "otherness," etc."

Hillary can't vouch for him. She can't pad the resume that he just doesn't have. She can't take away his 20 year relationship with Wright. She can't make Ayers disappear nor can she make his lies about their connection unsaid. She can't connect him to working class voters that he just hasn't figured out how to talk to in a way that gets them to vote for him. She can't unsay for him that he said those working class people cling to guns or religion as a way to explain their frustrations.

For the first time in my life the republicans don't have to swift boat the democratic nominee. They just have to tell the truth about him and let the voters decide. And Obama has no good way to counter that.

If Obama loses this election you will blame Hillary or racism and never look at the fact that you have picked a candidate with the thinnest resume of any candidate in at least the last 50 years with a couple of rather unsavory and extremely politically damaging relationships who, for all his ability to make inspiring speeches to the young and the well educated, doesn't seem to be able to talk to or connect with the working class and has referred to them in a most condescending way.

Just to let you know where I stand.

Right. For McCain. Got it. Now fuck off.

never look at the fact that you have picked a candidate with the thinnest resume of any candidate in at least the last 50 years with a couple of rather unsavory and extremely politically damaging relationships

Sure you aren't describing Bill Clinton in 1992?

Remind me again what national experience he had before assuming the presidency?

At least go for consistency, oceankat.

avatar

Bill Clinton didn't have a lot of experience when he ran for president which is one reason he wasn't my first choice that year. But Clinton did have 14 years of public service, 12 as governor. Obama has 11 years of public service. Neither had much substantial experience outside of government service. Now I realize that Arkansas is a small state but I think being in charge of a government for 12 years is more substantial experience than being a freshman Illinois senator for 7. Perhaps you disagree. As for the short time Obama has spent as a freshman US senator, half of that was spent running for president. I think I'm very consistent. I think its pretty clear that even Cliton, who became president with little experience, had significantly more than Obama. You, of course, are welcome to hold contrary opinions.

LOL, what a silly silly proposition.

You are apparently in the camp that was clamoring for Hillary to actually APOLOGIZE for something.

Let me ask you something - do YOU believe Obama is ready to be CIC?

Or do you need Hillary's words to believe that and not Obama's or your own?

You are a Hillary-hater by virtue of the fact that you wrote this hateful post. The fact that you say you are not a Hillary-hater proves nothing. As my grandmother said about nasty things: "FEH". No idea what it means or meant, but I get it and I use it with my kids too. FEH!

avatar

there is a good question somewhere in here for folks who are obama fanatics. even though the post was about hillary.

it takes two to tango, or refuse to tango, the mating dance by the defeated candidate hillary can only be appreciated by the mating dance done by the winner, obama.

you say you want red meat..did it ever occur to you the obama campaign might, on some whim, try to make hillary aware of their desires for a theme, or for red meat or lack thereof?

there are always alternatives in the universe to the one prevailing rule of many: whatever a clinton does, it must have some undercurrent of some evilness and selfishness...this is the principle of the universe, for many.

has it occured to you that obama might want to run and win on his reputation and nickle, not be beholding to anyone, even a former dem president? there is nothing wrong with that. obama is striving for a newness, a change, recall? cutting harnesses with the prior mule train, that shows independence, i can respect that, even i.

damned if you do, damned if you do so in the manner that does not fit in with my myoptic view....

back to the point, there is a good question here- what the hell else is it you fine folks want? you want hillary to jump she jumps but not high enough you say. like lucy with the football, you keep snatching it away....oh no, not yet, no respect yet, lets carp and lets whine about it all.

why the hillary hysterics redeux? isnt that john mccain on the ballot isnt that enough for you to focus? what will it take? seriously

avatar

Criticize Hillary for her silence and then we get the "Hillary can do no wrong" folks out in droves.

The positive side of last night is that Hillary did enough to unite the party. Was it enough for all of the gushing? I don't think so.

And that will be enough to brand me a "hater". So be it.

Hillary said what she was supposed to say. She did her job as a Democrat.
If you need more convincing, then give Barack a call. If you want to know if he's ready to be CIC or will keep you safe, listen to him.
My reasons to vote for Obama will not come out of Hillary's mouth.

avatar

There was a middle road that I'm sorry she didn't take -- attack John McCain. For every soundbite out there slamming Obama, give his campaign one from the same source with which to push back. Before the speech I had 3 hopes for it: 1) get her supporters on the Obama bandwagon, make it clear that is what she wants, 2) validate' Barack Obama as a very good person to be president, 3) use the fire we know she's capable of producing to blast John McCain. I think she did a boffo job of the first goal, which is probably the most important.

I don't think she did much of the other two, and I'm sorry because it left a lot of those supporters behind. If feelings are still too raw that she couldn't do the embracing, you can't fake that. But surely the third - attacking McCain - was something she, or anyone!, could do. Hell, *I* can work up a pretty warm speech listing the very, very real, concrete problems of a McCain presidency. She has been around for 30+ years -- her voice would be a powerful one saying "He's changed. He's not the same person. He's sold his soul." I can't help feeling regret - dissappointment - that she didn't do that.

But maybe that job is going to be handled by Bill tonight. That would be good.

avatar

Rec'd

avatar

"Hillary can't vouch for him. She can't pad the resume that he just doesn't have."

My sentiments exactly.

As for young AJ, who expects more from Hillary than he got last night, reminds me of someone who expects that he should get the job just because he is "special."

In the real world, the world where you don't get everything handed to you on a plate -- in HRC's world, where you have to fight and then fight some more to get anywhere, someone like Barack Obama has to earn her praise as a patriot and an honorable man.

Honestly, he hasn't been around long enough to have much of a record as either.

I think he was lucky to have such a strong speech, and such rallying support from Clinton, who has thus far given the best speech at the whole boring convention.

avatar

Luck, had nothing to do with it.

Amen to tonalli!!!!!!!!
I dont understand whats so hard to understand about that.

Well, nobody has to believe me that I'm a Hillary-hater. But I'm not. When she announced her candidacy, I was uber-excited.

I know Obama will be a good CiC. He's smart, he was right on Afghanistan, on attacking al Qaeda cells, on Iraq, etc.

But Hillary is a Democrat and has done damage. I just think she should do 100%, no 95%. I'm being picky; I'm not being hateful.

Well, nobody has to believe me that I'm not a Hillary-hater. I'm just not. When she announced her candidacy, I was uber-excited.

I know Obama will be a good CiC. He's smart, he was right on Afghanistan, on attacking al Qaeda cells, on Iraq, etc.

But Hillary is a Democrat and has done damage. I just think she should do 100%, no 95%. I'm being picky; I'm not being hateful. I really like her and respect her as a woman, politician and wife. Yet, I'm done with caring about Hillary. I don't live in New York anymore. This is my last post on her -- until 2012, or 2016, whenever.

avatar

I have been behind Senator Obama from the very start, and I wish you had not created this thread.

During the primary season we all said somethings that the other side could take offense at. That is what happened in the heat of battle. Senator Clinton was magnificent last night, and I did not want to make her do a walkback of shame for everything that McCain choose to use as a weapon against Senator Obama.

After this convention, all that ammo has been defused. You need to know when to stop nitpicking against a fellow Democrat, which Senator Clinton is.

It is time to stop forming a circular firing party, and instead direct all our fire in the direction of our real enemies, Bush/Cheney/McCain.

Keep your eyes on the prize.

Senator Obama is our nominee. Last night was Senator Clinton's finest hour, and one in which she truly found her voice. That Hillary would have been much harder to have defeat. I salute her. Now let us get on with the business of saving the Supreme Court from extreme right wingers, by electing Senator Obama as our next President.

Look, she said what she said during the primaries. Many of us argued, vociferously, that she shouldn't have, but she did. She doesn't do half measures. That toothpaste is out of the tube. There is no putting it back in.

If Hillary had tried to walk it back, it is all we would have heard about today. It would have been proof, proof positive, to the MSM, of her complete lack of sincerity because if she lied about this she'd lie about anything.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address