Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Backlash Cometh: MSM Op-Eds Make The Anti-Palin Argument For Obama

avatar

So, McCain made his ground-shaking pick, and the media jumped all over it, as was presumably his design. McCain won his news cycle - but now, these MSM outlets have had time to fully digest the pick and its ramifications - and are finding all sorts of odds and ends while unleashing its vetting grinder on Palin.  If these editorials are representative of the campaign's new meme, McCain lost the election in the bargain.

Here's a collection of various op-eds around the country that are, on the whole, not very flattering to the first-term Alaska governor.

I believe this media reaction will be critical to the Obama campaign's strategy.  They can just quote all this beautiful stuff here, and not have to get involved in hitting Palin directly. 

Senator Straight Talk's judgment is being bashed in these, too.  It's really beautiful when the media actually does its job and reports the truth, you know?

Happy reading!

The Denver Post

“I served with Hillary Clinton. I know Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a friend of mine. You, Sarah Palin, are no Hillary Clinton.” Sorry to steal Joe Biden’s thunder, but we didn’t want to wait for the vice presidential candidates’ debate to say the obvious. Yes, John McCain, who argues with a straight face that Barack Obama’s 12 years in the Illinois legislature and U.S. Senate aren’t enough to qualify him to run for president, has picked a running mate who just two years ago was serving as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, population 5,470. In short, the presumptive Republican nominee, an Old Soldier in all senses of that term, drafted the political equivalent of the Unknown Soldier as his co-pilot. McCain’s pick of Palin jettisons his attack that Obama isn’t ready to lead and looks more like a desperate “Hail Mary” campaign tactic aimed at female voters.
Detroit News
…Palin, 44, with less than two years as governor and no foreign policy experience, can’t be sold as ready to step into the presidency if called upon. Arizona Sen. McCain, if he wins, will be 72 when he takes office, and the question of succession is likely to be a concern for voters.

Kansas City Star:
But as this newspaper noted earlier this week, the most important question in evaluating a vice-presidential pick is whether that person is prepared to step into the Oval Office. Palin, with no national political experience and only a couple years in the Alaska governor’s office, is a very tough sell for the Republicans on that score. McCain’s age — he turned 72 on Friday — certainly doesn’t help. The Republican presidential candidate has emphasized the importance of military and national security issues, and taken shots at Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama the Democratic presidential nominee for having only four years of experience in the U.S. Senate. Yet McCain now suggests that someone halfway through her first term as governor is “exactly who this country needs” only one step away from the presidency.

Tampa Bay Tribune


John McCain can forget about trying to make a campaign issue out of Barack Obama’s relatively thin foreign policy resume. In an effort to blunt Obama’s post convention momentum, McCain made history Friday by choosing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate, the first woman to be nominated for vice president by the GOP. It is a risky move that stunned even some party leaders who fear that voters will have trouble imagining the former beauty queen as commander in chief, if it should ever come to that. The 44-year-old Palin, a former small-town mayor serving her first term as governor, has no experience in foreign policy.

Bangor Daily News:


Sen. John McCain shook up the political landscape Friday when he picked Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. At a time when the Republican’s biggest criticism of Democrat Barack Obama is that he lacks the experience necessary to run the country, it is a big risk that the second seat on the Republican ticket was given to a first-term governor with no national political experience. Palin, 44, is in her second year as governor of Alaska. She was previously the mayor of Wasilla, a town of 9,000. She is the least experienced major party candidate nominated for national office since Spiro Agnew, then the governor of Maryland, was picked by Richard Nixon in 1968. “If you are going to go after Barack Obama on experience … this pick makes no sense,” says University of Maine political science professor Mark Brewer.

Seattle Times:


As governor for less than two years and before that mayor of a very small town, she’s inexperienced enough to give fits to people worried about McCain’s health and longevity. McCain turned 72 the day he announced her selection. If something happens to him, she does not have time to grasp all the facets of the job, especially in the area of foreign policy… Her office also is involved in an investigation about the firing of a state public safety commissioner who refused to fire a trooper involved in divorce proceedings with Palin’s sister. In a small boon to Democrats, selecting Palin mutes future Republican attacks on Sen. Barack Obama’s inexperience.

Register Citizen:


Palin is not ready The Alaskan economy is nothing like the rest of the country because it is boosted by oil and natural gas development profits… It’s obvious that McCain’s choice for running mate is a way for the Republicans to look progressive by putting a woman on the ticket (although it comes 24 years after the Democrats nominated Geraldine Ferraro as their candidate for vice president) and appeal to the conservative wing of his party. It’s also obvious that McCain, if elected, is counting on surviving a presidential term.

Dallas Morning News:


The presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is the most risky Republican pick for vice president since George H.W. Bush tapped Dan Quayle as his No. 2. Ms. Palin, 44, has been governor for only two years. The office she held before that one was mayor of a town about the size of Midlothian. This is the person Mr. McCain, 72, would install a heartbeat away from the presidency. The Palin pick means the Republicans have ceded the high ground on the experience issue.

Washington Post:


But the most important question Mr. McCain should have asked himself about Ms. Palin was not whether she could help him win the presidency. It was whether she is qualified and prepared to serve as president should anything prevent him from doing so. This would have been true for any presidential nominee, and it was especially crucial that Mr. McCain — who turns 72 today — get this choice right…In this regard, count us among the puzzled and the skeptical…Once the buzz over Ms. Palin’s nomination dies down, the hard questions about her will begin. The answers will reflect on her qualifications — and on Mr. McCain’s judgment as well.

New York Times:


Governor Palin’s lack of experience, especially in national security and foreign affairs, raises immediate questions about how prepared she is to potentially succeed to the presidency. That really is the only criteria for judging a candidate for vice president.

Los Angeles Times:


What happened to his insistence that a running mate be qualified to serve as commander in chief? …An even better example is George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle in 1988. That selection, like McCain’s, was designed partly to placate restive Republican conservatives. Those are not persuasive precedents. In one respect, McCain is in even less of a position to gamble than were Mondale and Bush. His age makes it especially important that his running mate be prepared to assume the presidency at a moment’s notice.

Boston Globe:


In picking a first-term governor with no foreign-policy record, the Republican presidential candidate undermined his own central themes - experience and national security - and exposed the deep fault lines within his campaign…But the pick is hard to square with what Republicans have been saying all week: that Obama is too green to be president. Because Obama has bared his soul in a bestselling memoir and his decisions have been under a microscope for the last four years, voters can assess his judgment. Palin, in contrast, has next to no track record. Her ticketmate would be the oldest first-term president ever and has had health troubles in the past. McCain, meanwhile, is struggling to accommodate Palin within the logic of his campaign, which up to now stressed an existential threat from Islamic fundamentalism.

Journal News:


Hillaryites didn’t want a woman; they wanted that woman. If this is his attempt at wooing disaffected Hillary backers, he has sold all women short.

Miami Herald:


Political strategists say Clinton’s rank-and-file supporters will be tough for McCain and Palin to win. The ticket’s strong anti-abortion positions make them anathema to liberal Democrats concentrated in places such as South Florida…On Friday, she may have made her first official flip flop, saying that she opposed the so-called ”bridge to nowhere” that became a symbol of pork-barrel Washington spending. Yet in 2006, her spokesman told the Associated Press that she supported the project.

South FL Sun-Sentinel:


Another common concern: Palin’s perceived lack of experience, after less than two years as Alaska governor. Several voters said she’s not ready to take over the presidency, should something happen to McCain. He turned 72 Friday.

Philadelphia Daily News:


Franklin & Marshall College pollster Terry Madonna said that Palin’s personal story is an asset but that he would describe McCain’s pick in three words. “Risky, risky and risky,” Madonna said. “We just don’t know how she’ll handle the next nine weeks of campaigning, dealing with all these complicated national and international issues, debating [Obama's running mate] Joe Biden, and having every word scrutinized by an aggressive press corps.” The greatest unanswered question is whether putting Palin on the ticket will bring many Clinton Democrats into the McCain column. The Daily News reached five women who were Clinton primary-election supporters in a March poll, and none said Palin’s candidacy would change their vote.

Pittsburgh Tribune Review (money-losing right-wing rag published by Mellon descendant Richard Scaife):


The choice might undercut a theme promoted by McCain’s campaign. McCain has touted being more experienced than Obama, a first-term senator from Illinois. Palin is three years younger than Obama, 47, and younger than two of McCain’s seven children. Before becoming governor, Palin served as mayor of Wasilla, a city with fewer than 10,000 people…Democrats noted that Palin is the subject of a legislative investigation in Alaska over whether she forced out a top government official because he wouldn’t fire her ex-brother-in-law…”She is a risky choice,” said G. Terry Madonna, political science professor at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster. “Her record as a reformer and maverick is very helpful but how can she prep on so many national and international issues? She hurts the ticket because now the experience argument is weaker.”

Chicago Tribune:


John McCain has described national security, defense, the war in Iraq and the war on terror as “the transcendent issues, the most important issues of our day.” So who did he choose for his running mate? Someone who has zero acquaintance with those issues. The first and last question to be asked about a potential vice president is: Is he or she prepared to take over immediately as president? Barack Obama’s choice of Joe Biden gave that matter the priority it deserves. The question is even more important for McCain because he’s 72 years old and has had serious health problems. The chances are considerably higher than usual that his vice president would have to step into the Oval Office without notice…this decision mocks McCain’s seriousness on the issues that are supposed to be his strength. It tells us that he puts his own political fortunes above the safety of the nation. McCain has done a lot of things for his country. He should have done one more and picked a running mate who makes a plausible commander-in-chief.

New York Times (Gail Collins):


He was looking for someone who was well prepared to fight against international Islamic extremism, the transcendent issue of our time. And in the end he decided that in good conscience, he was not going to settle for anyone who had not been commander of a state national guard for at least a year and a half. He put down his foot!…I do feel kind of ticked off at the assumptions that the Republicans seem to be making about female voters…The idea that women are going to race off to vote for any candidate with the same internal plumbing is both offensive and historically wrong.

AP (Ron Fournier - yes, THAT Ron Fournier!):


She is younger and less experienced than the first-term Illinois senator, and brings an ethical shadow to the ticket. Just 20 months ago, she was mayor of Wasia, Alaska, a town of 6,500 where the biggest issue is controlling growth and the biggest annual worry is whether there will be enough snow for the Iditarod dog-mushing race… Palin’s lack of experience flies in the face of GOP charges that Obama is not ready to be commander in chief. McCain himself has said he was determined to avoid a pick like Dan Quayle, the little-known Indiana senator George H.W. Bush put on his ticket in 1988 in a choice that proved embarrassing…But, as McCain suggested himself, his 72nd birthday is a reminder that age and experience matter.

Boston Globe (Peter S. Canellos):


McCain will have a hard time persuading people that he chose the most qualified person to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. Palin, at 44, has been governor of one of the nation’s least-populous states for just two and a half years.

TIME (Amy Sullivan):


It appears Sarah Palin was picked not just for her appeal to women voters but also to please social conservatives. If so, this could be Harriet Miers redux. And that didn’t work out so well the first time.

Chicago Tribune (Andrew Zajac):


John McCain may have some work to do with Republican Party pros regarding his selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate if the underwhelmed reaction of former Maryland GOP Gov. Robert Ehrlich is any indication… “I gotta go digest this choice,” he mumbled to a couple of acquaintances.

ABC News (Jake Tapper - yes, THAT Jake Tapper!):


Palin doesn’t exactly scream “experience,” which is McCain’s main argument against Obama. For a decade she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, which has a population of approximately 8,471, which the Obama campaign says is less than 1/20th the size of his former state senate district. Palin has been governor for two years. Some might argue that in terms of experience she makes Obama look like Robert Byrd. In July, Palin told CNBC’s Larry Kudlow that “as for that VP talk all the time, I tell ya, I still can’t answer that question until, until somebody answers for me ‘What it is exactly that the vice president does every day?”

TIME (Mike Murphy):


McCain’s mighty and oft-swung Obama swatting hammer of experience has been instantly changed from steel to rubber. VP examination stakes are a little higher for McCain, will she pass the ready on Day One test with less than two years in a (small) statehouse? Former full Colonel in the Pat Buchanan brigades...

Washington Post (Robert Barnes and Michael D. Shear):


When he ended months of speculation Friday, McCain did not laud Palin as immediately ready to take over, which he once said was his highest priority for a running mate.

Chicago Tribune (Mark Silva):


When Obama was looking at Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine of Virginia as a possible running mate, Karl Rove, the “architect” of President Bush’s election campaigns, dismissed his experience - a governor for three years and mayor of 103rd largest Richmond. We’re not sure where Wasilla ranks.


Comments (168)

Wow. Rec'd for the work alone and fact you nailed the formatting on your first attempt.

The Boston Globe writer you linked actually gave Gov. Palin a years too much experience as she has only been in office a little over a year and a half, and he mistakenly stated 2.5 years.

avatar

Damn, I missed that. Would've pointed it out. Thanks for the catch.

avatar

Interesting that nobody seems to know just exactly how big Wasilla is -- the figures there range from just under 5,500 to 9,000 (and the Pittsburgh paper punted with "under 10,000").

I guess it depends on whether you count the bears and the mooses.

One of my biggest questions is this: how the hell does a mayor of town with the population of approximately 8,000 people raise the resources to run and win a statewide governor race? I mean, every indication is she has some enemies in her locality and her own party is not supportive. Where did she get those resources? I know Alaska isn't that big, but it still costs a pretty penny to run a campaign, especially for a prior unknown without an established financial base of support.

No one points out that she was a part-time mayor, either. It has a police department and a library, which we know because of her LibraryGate scandal (of, if the good people of Wasilla had succeeded in their mayoral recall effort, we would not be in this position today), but no school system. If you're not managing a school district, it's hardly mayoral experience at all, is it.

No one notes her mayoral position was part-time. Wasilla has a library and police dept but no school system.

Oh, if the good people of Wasilla had succeeded in their mayoral recall effort, we would not be in this position right now.

avatar

Good points all, but unfortunately the hard fact remains that McBush benefits by having everyone talking about ANYTHING but him.

Same story with GUSTAV.

Can someone tell me why the heck McBush is planning to visit Jackson, MS today?

It's easy to figure out. He wants everyone to talk about the hurricane for the ENTIRE Repub convention.

It's not going to work, but what else can he do?
McCain is pathetic to an extreme.

That's why we should keep reminding people that Palin is another Bush: She's a global warming denier. She'll fight anything that reduces our dependence on oil because Alaskans get paid for the oil drilled in their state.

We also need to use the issue of Gustav to remind people why the GOP's desire to decimate the government hurts us all:
* Do you want a minimalist government if a natural disaster hits your town?
* Do you want the money to maintain the infastructure of your state vetoed in favor of military spending and corporate handouts?
* Do you want funding for first responders slashed in order to lower taxes for the very rich?
* Do you want the National Guard fighting in Iran, Iraq, Afganistan and Georgia all at once, when the next flood or earthquake or forest fire threatens your state?
* If you lose your home in a disaster, do you want the government to side with the insurance companies when they deny your claim, then tell you they won't help you either, because you're just a whiner, looking for a "handout?"

Gustav is the perfect example to use to remind people why we need a functioning, funded government. Remember, the "ownership" society means "You're on your own."

Damn, that is a lot of bad press. I'm cautiously optimistic that this won't work, but it is possible that she isn't as weak as she seems.

If she was, I cannot understand why they'd choose her.

avatar

The question isn't her strength or weakness. It's quite possible that she could end up being the first female POTUS someday, especially if her reformer cred holds up.

The question you ask is critical - as is the ansnwer. Why did they choose her? My guess is that your "they" is actually just McCain himself. Which is why the "judgment" argument will be so devastating in the weeks to come.

avatar

"they would choose her", urbanash, because they are idiots.

McCain is a pampered old fool and his 'evangelical' puppeteers have one track minds about controlling the reproductive decisions of strangers. You are talking about a very old man who may be entering dementia who sings songs about bombing people.

avatar

They chose her because she seems like someone you know, someone you've met.

Of the four people running in this campaign, the one most people will feel the most comfortable with is her. She speaks the language most families speak -- carpools, hockey practice, trying to do right by your kids. And you add to that she's a governor who went back to work rather than sit around on maternity leave (they're interpretation, not mine), that she's established she will make hard choices, because having a Down's baby is a hard choice, and she's apparently unafraid. She's going to play well when speaking to the morning shows, and she's going to look good on the cover of People. She's going to feel like a friend, even if you disagree with her.

The best example of this is Mika -- the MSNBC co-host with Scarborough (i can say her last name, but can't spell it). She was aghast at the pick when it was announced. As angry as a newsperson should let herself be. But when Palin finished speaking, there was a shift in her tone. She's an Obama supporter -- has been all along -- but there was a since of familiarity she spoke about. Like she could relate to her mom-to-mom.

Remember the first idea of Bush -- he was someone you could have a beer with, while Kerry/Gore weren't? The country -- at least for the last two election cycles -- wants people who are like them. They don't want people who are smarter, more polished, more impressive. They want someone they feel comfortable with. Someone who they feel really understands them. They may be impressed with Obama, or Biden, or even McCain, but none of those men makes anyone feel they are just like them.

That's why they chose her. She's pretty. She's firey. She's accomplished enough. And most importantly, she's relateable. The MSM, and Olberman and Madow and Matthews can roll their eyes all they want. This pick is dangerous to us. Very dangerous.

avatar

The whole point of all these editorials is simple.

The rapidly forming CW is that Palin can't possibly be ready to be POTUS.

And the corollary to that CW is that any POTUS candidate who would make someone with Palin's resume the #2 on the ticket deserves to have his/her judgment called into question.

Palin is dangerous ONLY if Obama's camp hits her directly. If the attacks stay focused on McCain - and history shows that voters vote based on the #1 slot more than the #2 - I don't think McCain can seriously justify this pick, especially as the media gives her their own special vetting.

avatar

The media will vet Palin. Obama needs to concentrate on McCain. Keep hitting him. It was his bad choice, not hers. And it does look like McCain is rattled. The DNC convention was a surpising success, his big speech was a hit, and Hillary and Obama made up. McCain is rightfully worried by last week. This is the first panicky move by a nervous McCain.

Given McCain's tendency to go ballistic, this is an excellent opportunity for Obama to get under his skin. If McCain seems rattled now, wait till he gets hit with a series of ads highlighting these editorial comments. The coup de gace will be bringing them up in the first debate. Obama does not need to criticise Palin directly- all he has to do is reference a half a dozen key editorial comments. If asked if he thinks she's unqualified, he can say that she does not inspire confidence in the most informed segment of the American public, and then cherry pick comments from the most conservative editorials he can.

I might be worried about all that if her voice weren't so damn annoying.

I truly think they chose her in a panic.

The houses gaffe ruled out Romney. Karl Rove ruled out Lieberman and Ridge (and Ridge was my biggest fear). They saw the Democratic convention was a wild success and that McCain couldn't steal the news cycle by naming any of the people on his short list. They knew their convention would not get the coverage or interest that the Dems got and saw hurricane Gustav threatening to steal even more coverage away from them. It truly was a hail Mary pass, and while we shouldn't help them win the expectations game by expecting her to be a drooling idiot; we also shouldn't cower in fear of the genius of Karl Rove.

The best thing is: all those GOPers have to scurry back home and scrub their convention speeches, removing all the lines about how experience is the only thing that matters when choosing a president.

avatar

You know, sometimes it is what it seems. I recall after OJ murdered his wife, his supporters would say things like "would he really be so stupid as to leave all that evidence behind?" Uhm, yeah. Sometimes it is what it is. We can't presume competence or intelligence. We don't even know how many people he consulted on this pick or how long he took to make up his mind. He admits that he makes fast decisions that are often wrong. Just great.

Ya' Know, that's the first time I've ever seen a diamond(?) encrusted flag lapel-pin. (Pic on the Tampa Bay Tribune).

Also, did you notice that the immediate effect of this choice is that these articles are unanimous in questioning John McCain's age as a serious issue. Every single one noted that at his age, it is likely McCain won't survive the presidency(or might not, not guaranteed to, etc.).

Whoo hooo! Obama didn't have to play the age card, McCain played it on himself!

(Great roundup BTW!)

avatar

That was an exact point I made in another blog. Although Palin is the female George Bush (politically that is a good thing) McCain did 2 things.

1. Took experience off the table
2. Brought his age back to the forefront.

Absolutely!

Obama has been careful not to mention McCain's age for some very good strategic reasons. Now every mention of Palin brings up the fact that McCain is 72 and not in the best of health.

Was Johnny so stupid that he didn't think this would happen? Maybe, and that's telling.

Add that to the brewing ethic scandal, which if it gains traction can sink her, and McCain has just defeated himself.

avatar

Free press this bad (and likely to get worse) for Barack Obama's (putative) opponent ought to put the Democratic Party's ad-budget people joyfully in mind of Ben Franklin's adage: "A penny saved is a penny earned."

Grandpa Simpson McBush has just saved multiple millions of pennies for the Democrats who now have only to sorrowfully (and inexpensively) point to the deluge of daily newspaper articles lamenting (truthfully, for a change) the declining mental capacities (never much to begin with) of old Mr. "noun, verb, and POW" who wants so much to play commander-in-briefs but can't remember where he misplaced his diapers.

Sorry I couldn't recommend this a hundred times. Great work! TPM should put this on the front page of the site. Did I say it yet? Great work! Really.

TPM should put this on the front page of the site

No can do. The MSM is the evil enemy, remember? :-)

p.s. I also learned in teh blogosphere that if the corporate lackeys running those newspapers don't like something, chances are it's good for teh people and it's dangerous to their status quo. U can help bring down those bastards by electing teh people's princess, Sarah. :-)

avatar

Wonderful work, thanks!

When I can hold my leftie paranoia at bay, I'm inclined to think this pick really is just as dumb as it looks. Quayle was an inspired choice by comparison.

Quayle was, indeed, an inspired choice: at the time, there were increasing indications that Bush was quite involved in Iran-Contra. Putting a lightweight in play effectively put Q between Bush and the threat of impeachment. It worked, and it only took twenty minutes for me to realize it.

If they're doing their jobs for once, we have to leave it alone and let them do it. A backlash to the backlash is inevitable, if only because we've had one to everything this campaign. If the backlash to the backlash is to ugly comments from Obama or liberal blogs/commenters, the back-backlash (backlash lash?) will come from the MSM. If they, and we, lay off, it will come only from the far right and will thus be less dangerous to us.

More seriously, thanks. For my taste, there's no better blog post than sharing a good compilation of professional media, especially one like this one that shows a trend.

Wow. Thanks for compiling these! I'm scared shitless, and not because I think she helps his ticket. I think she hurts his ticket but the thought of that woman assuming the office of our President is horrifying.

Great post. Nice to see the MSM showing some sanity. She enthralls their base but they were in line already and insults Hillary's folks that we welcome to join us...

If I line up Palin beside Hillary (who I am NOT a fan of) even I run for experience, competence, toughness and intelligence.

I definitely want my daughters to emulate Hillary not Palin,

If the Democrats didn't have Foreign policy, the economy and 8 years of Bush to talk about,they could ride the Palin pick all the way to November

I love you for this - thank you so very much.

Thank you thank you thank you!

I've been ready for a nice long rest in a white room for the last day and a half, listening to people darkly predict our doom because of McLame's ultra-double Rovian twist secret plot in making her Mclame's VP or else sighing with all the cynicism of their 20 some odd years of life about how very stupid American voters are.

I really thought I had gone down the rabbit hole when I heard this pick - and then when people started taking it seriously -

well, I began to wonder what was wrong with me - there's nothing serious about his choice except the seriousness of the mistake McLame has made.

avatar

Because I am obsessive when it comes to the Veepstakes, I found myself looking around for female running mates for McCain back in May. (At that time, I was thinking in terms of him trying to counteract a possible Obama/Clinton ticket.)

For me, it really came down to three people: Meg Whitman, Kay Bailey Hutchison, and Sarah Palin.

Palin was actually the first on the list that I discarded. Why? Lack of experience - which is always the first thing you look for in a Veep.

Whitman's run a multi-billion-dollar company that helps a lot of people make extra money, so that's decent economic cred. But, I found that her business dealings had a few rumored skeletons, and I figure she wouldn't survive vetting. (This, of course, was before "houses" - and if you think Romney's rich, check out Meg's bankroll!)

I really thought he'd go with Hutchison - which would have been a much more serious pick with HRC hard-cores, IMHO. Yeah, she's pro-choice, but McCain could've argued that he had someone who doesn't agree with him down the line and would be an important voice in his discussions.

Palin just smacks of desperation - and I have serious doubts as to how thoroughly she was vetted.

avatar

Whitman was even more of a no-go than Fiorina. Fiorina is an incompetent wanna-be spymaster, but Whitman is well known for staying just on this side of the law. It's not a coincidence that since she took over EBay they've basically made their money by turning a blind eye to fraud and the very-gray markets, collecting commissions and fees til the cows come home on the volume it generates.

avatar

I hear ya, Tena. I was staring to think *I* was losing my marbles-not McCain. The only thing I can think is this is some kind of performance art...

I love you for this - thank you so very much.

Thank you thank you thank you!

I've been ready for a nice long rest in a white room for the last day and a half, listening to people darkly predict our doom because of McLame's ultra-double Rovian twist secret plot in making her Mclame's VP or else sighing with all the cynicism of their 20 some odd years of life about how very stupid American voters are.

I really thought I had gone down the rabbit hole when I heard this pick - and then when people started taking it seriously -

well, I began to wonder what was wrong with me - there's nothing serious about his choice except the seriousness of the mistake McLame has made.

Excellent compilation, thanks for the hard work!

I hope we can quickly pivot to the "What the hell was he thinking? Is this how he makes all his decisions?" angle.

Rec'd and appreciated.

I have scanned through a lot of commentary and blogs today checking reactions. There are the occassional women who just want to vote for a woman no matter what and he may gain a couple of votes that way. There are a few conservatives excited about this pro life, exciting, fresh face conservative.

However most of what I read were people shocked, dumbfounded, or angry about this choice. By my read he has lost more votes than he will gain. Many angry men and women who can't believe that he made this choice. He may have very well sealed this election for Senator Obama by making this VP pick.

O I think we've won this bitch - o yeah.

I am stunned that McCain would put us, the citizens, in such peril with this woman at the helm. I'm angry that he is willing to risk my children for this election. Really angry.

avatar

That is a lot of bad press.

But this is genuinely a terrible, no, disastrous choice.

Rec'd

Thanks for all the effort you spent putting this together for us. Good job!

:-)

Either Sarah Palin has talents and skills we were not aware of”, or “John McCain fell down and hit his head”.


Alaskans React
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/local-reaction-to-the-palin-bombshell/

nice

Fantastic job compiling these!

Interesting that some of the harshest editorials came from papers (WaPo, etc.) that probably would have endorsed him in November, had he made a sane pick. With this pick, I would be shocked if anyone other than the WSJ endorses him for Pres.

Cable news must be thrilled though, since it gives them something "dramatic" to talk about.

Dude. That was awesome. I'm in awe. Holy shit. I've been looking all over at different publications' analyses of Palin, but you compiled it all right here. And it screams of negativity. McCain got what he deserved. Palin is a ridiculously horrible choice, and I truly hope McCain and the GOP pay dearly for it.

Great job & Rec'd. Now about that 17% favorability gap between men and women....

avatar

Then why do you guys keep whining that the press is pro-McCain?

I told you. This isn't 2000.

avatar

Before you dislocate your shoulder patting yourself on the back, remember this: it took a move as horrendous as Palin for McCain to get hammered like this.

avatar

Actually, the press really has been slanted in fovor of the Republicans this cycle...its just that this pick is SO awful that even THEY cannot ignor it.

avatar

Spot on! It will be hard for astute voters to swallow the GOP VP pick. Palin's family will struggle with the microscope that is coming.

avatar

As much as I HATE the Washington Post [I only wish I could cancel 50 more times after canceling initially], I've got to give them credit for cutting directly to the chase:

But the most important question Mr. McCain should have asked himself about Ms. Palin was not whether she could help him win the presidency. It was whether she is qualified and prepared to serve as president should anything prevent him from doing so.

This is a two-fer: McCain's bad judgment + Palin's lack of experience.

She's the female Clarence Thomas.

Thanks for all that work! Wow, that's a whole lot of negative going into the convention.

The timing of the hurricane is rather perfect for the convention; no one will notice empty seats, and there cannot be the inevitable comparisons with the Democratic convention. Why? Because they'll cancel the Republican convention.

They're scaling back Monday's convention activities already, per the NYTimes... A built-in excuse that makes the two conventions impossible to compare.

avatar

Just for the record Wasilla isn't even in the TOP 10 of biggest cities.............IN ALASKA. What the hell does Karl Rove have to say about that.

i think he has said, and will likely repeat: "she was mayor of the 2nd largest city in alaska"

I cheated and gave you another "recommend" after already doing it once before. This amount of shoe-leather work deserves to stay at the top of the Recommended Readers Posts for a week.

It stopped the Obama made the greatest speech of all time news. It also stopped all the talk of Grampy McSame.

That was all this pick was meant to do, buy time, hope that something....anything...will come up.

avatar

True enough, but if it stopped the press talking about Obama's very impressive address, it was only to start them talking about McCain's appalling lack of judgement in his VP pick, so I'm not sure it was a net gain for them.

avatar

True enough, but if it stopped the press talking about Obama's very impressive address, it was only to start them talking about McCain's appalling lack of judgement in his VP pick, so I'm not sure it was a net gain for them.

avatar

Yes, but I read one comment online today by a Hillary supporter who was leaning Obama saying that his speech last night had almost won her over, but what tipped the scales was the news the following day of McCain's Palin pick, which insulted her. So it may have worked to Obama's advantage that these two events, which have so much power to influence votes, unfolded back to back.

Wow, that's a lot of testimony. I think I'm feeling the spirit.

But seriously, the natural question this editorial consensus raises is can the pundits reach one conclusion and the electorate another? If I were in a charitable mood or if Palin were a Democrat, I would conceive a Frank Capra like narrative of Sarah Palin Goes to Washington - a naive saint who somehow nows better than the encrusted establishment. Just a thought.

avatar

Wow! All in one spot! You covered every liberal paper in the ol'USA! The sad part is, they have never carried an election! The MSM has been in the tank for Osama for the last year. They threw Hillary under the bus. Now they are aiming at Sarah. Guess what? The trust of MSM is as low as Congress, which is 20% lower than Bush. The people will decide this one just as they have the last two. Ha! No impeachment, Cheney is free, Rumsfield walks and the papers are still whining. Ha! The people keep electing winners! It's been the people all along!

avatar

Every liberal paper? Really?

You mean, like the Pittsburgh Trib?
Or AP's Ron Fournier?
Or the McCain-endorsing NY Times?
Or ABC's Jake Tapper?

Yeah, you're right.

And I didn't even see Charles Krauthammer (that noted bastion of liberal ideology) rip Palin today.

Wow! All in one comment! The "librul media" nonsense, the endlessly clever Osama/Obama switcheroo, the phony "Dems threw Hillary under the bus" concern trolling (hilarous, coming from right wingers), and the characteristic stupid-arrogant gloating combined with the tired "still whining" taunt.

You're beautiful, "OldSarg"! You can pack a lot of poop in a very small baggy. Superb job!

great Job, Boyd! BYW, her is Steve Clemmons's take on the Palin pick:

But the national-security dripping "Country First" sloganeering that McCain has been doing just does not fit with Sara Palin.

This was a "Country Last" decision. If McCain had something happen to him, I just don't know what the country would do.

We would be faced with a scary situation in which many major institutions in our nation -- and you probably know at least part of what I'm talking about -- might not support her ascension to the presidency. We have to consider the implications of that.

I can't prove that the government would divide if she were to move from VP to the presidency, but I know that there would be enormous tension. I think we'd see mass resignations.

Sarah Palin is not Hillary Rodham Clinton. She is not Condoleezza Rice. She isn't Kathleen Sibelius or Olympia Snowe or Janet Napolitano. She's not Susan Eisenhower or Dianne Feinstein.

And here's the link:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/08/country_first_m/

Impressive list, thanks for the assembly work!

But if we are realpolitik, we note that this is Labor Day weekend, and quite slow news-wise. Moreover, next week, the GOP convention kicks off.

For those who think the GOP doesn't know what it's doing consider:

a) McCain didn't disappear during the Dem Convention week -- despite some very major stories (Clinton v Obama, what will the Clintons say?, PUMAs, etc.)


b) On the day Obama was nominated, McCain captured some of the news cycle away from a hugely historic event with this "little ad".

c) On Obama's huge night, McCain teased people with will he/won't he leak the VP selection name. Thus, the night was not owned by the Dems

d) Immediately the next morning, McCain at very least splits the front page with Obama -- a very difficult thing to do given the immensity of Obama's speech (location, historical context, oratory, etc.)

e) And now the huge negative fallout comes during one of the slowest times of the year.

f) The fallout will further be under more GOP control when they have their convention -- and that becomes the huge news story.

Students of campaigns should take note: the McCain camp is just as good at precisely commanding the storyline as the Obama camp.

This campaign is beginning to pick up real drama: it will be exciting to see what the Dems do to dent the GOP on their convention week.

Ironically, given the very long campaign season, this is one of the most exciting races to the White House we've had in a long time (and not just in terms of who-wins-it suspense).

Don't get me wrong: I would have much preferred a very boring campaign where Obama just rolls into the White House.

Should we really be really worrying about McCain stealing a news cycle. This was only to be expected since the Republican convention tails the Democrat convention and that McCain hadn't picked a VP candidate. Also, the pick of a relatively unknown person naturally calls for more news time to fill the vacuum of Palin's identity.

The only thing I really worry about is that the meme that McCain makes bad or reckless decisions will be lost even though that's exactly what his VP choice demonstrates.

Agreed. Except he didn't "steal" a news cycle. The MSM had already given this one to him days before it happened. They actually interrupted Democratic Covention Coverage and a speech to spend about twenty minutes discussing the fact that Informed Sources Tell Us That John McCain Had Decided. Turns out, he hadn't. They just wanted to toss a stinkbomb, but, still, this cycle was promised, signed, SWAK, and delivered, long before he chose Palin.

You're right, but I would argue that despite the fact that it's Labor Day weekend, the overwhelmingly bad press and consensus on Palin being a horrible choice will follow McCain through the convention.

Palin now has to genuinely prove herself to the electorate. And if she falls in the least bit flat, she's going to get derided by the press, and that will be what the Convention is remembered for.

The fact that certain sources are now saying McCain and the GOP are considering getting rid of the Convention and instead holding a huge fundraiser for Hurricane Gustav, while a very kind gesture, is going to hurt McCain badly if they do it.

I don't expect they will, but if they don't, and don't postpone the Convention until later, Gustav landing around the same time is going to damage them horribly.

McCain/Palin goes into the Convention with a negative mandate. They're going to have to astound the entire electorate, pundits included, in order to come out of it looking good. And after the success of the Democratic Convention, that looks like a very, very difficult task to accomplish.

avatar

Politico now reports that McCain may deliver his acceptance speech...

...wait for it...

...by satellite.

Can someone get Dubya to show up at McCain's location with a sheet cake?

Politico now reports that McCain may deliver his acceptance speech....wait for it....by satellite.

Strictly speaking, so did Obama.

I don't understand this point.

Obama delivered his speech live to 80,000 people, and over 40 million people nationwide.

Remember on night one of the Democratic Convention, after Michelle's speech, when Obama showed up on a satellite feed? That's how McCain might deliver his acceptance speech to the Convention. Quite a bit different if you ask me.

Good point.

The night WAS owned by the Democrats as evidenced by such large numbers. That's why I don't see clearthinkers' point (c).

I dunno about you, but I watched mostly on CSPAN. However, every time I flicked to the cable stations someone was mentioning whether McCain would violate protocol about announcing his candidate, etc.

In other words, on the biggest night the Dems had in a while (and the ratings bare THAT point out!), McCain was able to find a way to insert himself with something compelling enough that the talking heads kept bringing it up.

I agree about the difference -- but my point is that what does "satellite" do for me? It's just a way to move the signal around! Why is this significant?

If McCain were launched into space -- restrain the obvious joke -- and delivered *that* by satellite, then I can see the news worthiness of the story.