Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

On Obama's Poll Numbers, Registered vs. Likely Voters, and The "Why Isn't He Leading" Meme

Cross-posted from The Left Anchor...


Crian hits on some good points in his piece concerning the media's
continued concern with Obama's "poor poll numbers" (odd how the fact
that McCain hasn't led once among RVs all summer doesn't reflect poorly
on him).  Crian notes that given Obama's quick rise to prominence,
people are more likely to view him as an unknown quantity whereas
McCain's been in the public spotlight ever since he began his bid in
1999.  This is a fair point, but I also think it's important to note
that Obama is, in fact, leading, and he has been all summer long. 
Obama's five point lead has been almost unbelievably consistent.  The most recent Gallup poll has Obama at a -- you guessed it -- five point advantage over John McCain (47-42). 

Another oft-overlooked fact is that Obama has reached fifty percent support in the Gallup polls several times this summer.  McCain has yet to break 44 percent support among registered voters.  The best the McCain camp can do is point to some brief leads their candidate has enjoyed among likely voters, but historically, this far from the election polls of registered voters are likely to be more accurate than those of likely voters (the reverse is true in the closing weeks of a campaign).  This comes directly from the editor of Gallup himself, Frank Newport:

The July 25-27 USA Today/Gallup poll shows Barack Obama leading John McCain by a 47% to 44% margin among all registered voters but McCain leading Obama among likely voters by a 49% to 45% margin. This difference between registered and likely voters indicates that now McCain voters are disproportionately represented among the estimate of those most likely to vote if the election were held today.

<snip>

So, as a rule of thumb, registered voters are the relevant group to trend to establish basic patterns of change in voter support for presidential candidates. Likely voter modeling at this point is an additional analytic tool.

Even the conservative magazine National Journal views the likely voter models as suspicious, especially in light of how far off they are from the registered voter models:

Emory University political science professor Alan Abramowitz is undeterred. "A 7 point difference in [the vote preference] margin between actual voters and all registered voters," he wrote me, "would be much larger than that found in American National Election Studies surveys in any of the 14 presidential elections between 1952 and 2004 -- the largest gap in pre-election margin was 3 points way back in 1952, and the average gap was only one point."

I think he has a point. Gallup's data tells us that Obama's narrow lead among registered voters depends on those who tend to score lower on measures that typically correlate with turnout. So, not surprisingly, the Obama campaign is investing heavily in efforts to register and turn out new voters.

What is less clear is whether news accounts ought to be emphasizing such snapshots in July when the mechanism for those estimates is so inherently hypothetical and potentially shaky.

But even giving McCain the benefit of the doubt here, among likely voters, McCain has lead only twice, once by four points, and once by a single point, and the poll which put McCain at a four point lead significantly underrepresented the youth vote even by 2004 standards despite the fact that the youth vote is likely to increase this year.  Obama has carried every other likely voter or registered voter poll since the middle of May.  Moreover, Obama leads McCain in total number of field offices by nearly 3 to 1.  Effective voter outreach combined with a solid GOTV plan can add an extra two points to a candidate's numbers on election day.  The extended primary helped Obama in this sense, forcing him to organize and invest in states very early in the year, and putting him at a significant advantage over McCain.

To put it more bluntly, Obama is leading.  He has the better ground operation, and it's probable that the likely voter polls are filtering out many of Obama's supporters (the youth vote), while overrepresenting likely McCain voters (the elderly).  And yet, Obama is still leading.

As always, recs greatly appreciated.


Comments (12)

Tip jar...

Good points.

I think the reason for "concern" in the media is rather more simple - Obama is the "inevitable" candidate in a Democratic year. So given the constant gloom Republicans broadcast about their chances this fall across the board, the rosy expectations broadcast by DailyKos for Congress gains, it makes sense to wonder about the tiny size of Obama's lead.

Granted, the ground operation should break things in his favor, but again if he wins and wins without a landslide (despite the money, ground operation and all that), once again the question comes whether or not he won with a decisive mandate.

So far, he seems to be following Bill Clinton's steps to a T, his rejection of Clintonism notwithstanding.

The media seemed perfectly willing to subvert the historically understood meaning of mandate for Bush following the 2004 squeaker.

That said, I'm thinking the spread will be 5+ points. It won't be double digits or anything, but I don't think a 6 or 7 point victory is out of the question.

I'll settle for a .5 point, quite frankly.

I think it's up to him to get to a landslide, quite frankly, but I hear you.

The only thing that surprises me on the left blogs is how everyone talks as if the media has a mind of its own.

I think it's also important to note that Congressional races and Presidential races don't necessarily line up that office. It is a pretty fair assumption that Democrats will make significant gains in the House and Senate this year, but that's a whole different ballgame than how the presidential election will play out.

Interestingly, big gains in Congress can help secure a mandate even if Obama only wins by a narrow margin, because it will be an overall victory for the Democratic agenda. Though I do expect anything south of three points will cause the media to follow a "Obama loses even though he won" narrative.

Its pretty simple actually. "This just in: Obama still ahead" = ratings destroying yawner.

avatar

I am a bit more cynical about the MSM's reasons for harping on why Obama is in trouble if he is not far ahead, namely, it would be to their advantage to have a tight and exciting race. Working up the Obama folks, who are more invested in the election's outcome, is also a good move. I don't by any means think that these are the only reasons, but they are factors. Also, this is how the Republicans want to frame the situation, and for various reasons it has become the storyline.

The MSM needs to do a better job.

"Media Hype and Election Polls (or the sky is falling)"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/media-hype-and-election-polls/

Is it likely that Obama has more voters who don't have land lines, and therefore are not being polled? I've asked this before, but not gotten an answer.

14% of voters have no landlines. That said, a recent study by Pew which suggested the effects of this on polls was minimal.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/07/18/cell_phones_not_skewing_polls.html

avatar

Pew considers a 2 or 3 percentage point difference insignicant. I'll take it and gladly tack on an additional 2 points to Obama's lead in every poll.

This is a particularly good post. I agree with it entirely. I think the idea that the youth vote will not turn out in numbers greater than prior years was debunked this spring. I think the models are insufficiently reflective of this. Also, the likely voter models I think overstate the stability and enthusiasm of elements of McCain's base.

McCain is already at 87% of the GOP base. He can barely improve that. O will get into the mid80s, and that will be enough for a four or five point win. Then again, I don't give a shit if he wins while losing the popular vote and with an electoral tie. I just want us to win.

avatar

Spring is too long ago. What about the July 10-13 ABC/Washington Post poll finding? It asked registered voters if they were certain to vote. Only 46 percent of voters under 30 said they were -- that's a 20 point drop cf the same poll taken Feb. 28-March 2 during the heady 11 primary/caucus Obama victories, before the Wright clips took over youtube on March 13.

(Compare that with the 79% of elderly voters who said in the July poll they were certain to vote.)

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address