« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
No hope of audacity
Change we can believe in is, apparently, a choice to back a conservative Democratic incumbent over a liberal challenger, because the former's political IOU will be worth more in a rookie President's first term than the latter's.
It is reneging on a pledge to do everything in one's power to oppose a dreadful FISA bill. It is making a safe, solid, stolidly moderate pick for VP, instead of a daring, controversially progressive one.
It is constantly signaling to the middle of the road and conservative voters that they can trust you to do nothing that will upset, annoy or alienate them, while simultaneously blowing a great big juicy razzberry to everyone on the left.
John McCain and his political handlers know right down in their bones that the only way McCain wins the Presidency in November is if he manages to get more Americans out there to pull a lever against Obama than for him.
Obama, unfortunately, has chosen to adopt exactly the same strategy -- try to appeal to those he hasn't convinced yet, sure, but, for the most part, play it safe with moderates and do his level best to get a majority of voters to decide that, no matter what else may happen, they simply cannot under any circumstances vote for McCain.
This is Obama's message to liberals, progressives, and everyone else out here on the political left -- sure, I may piss you off when I stab you in the back, but what the hell, it's not like any of you people are going to vote for McCain, right?
Obama's great strength is not that he's Not-McCain. Being Not-McCain isn't enough. Any and/or all of the other possible Democratic candidates were also Not-McCain. Obama won the nomination not by being someone else's negative reflection, but by being his own positive image. He was someone to vote for. He could persuade people. He could stand up for principle and make a difference. He could reach the undecideds and bring in new voters. He was charismatic, articulate, brilliant. He could change the numbers, shake up the political equation, start a genuine revolution.
He could make a difference.
Now, he's just being the same old-same old. He's being That Guy. You know, the Adult. The politician who tells you Yes You Can... Probably. The one who tempers his idealistic vision of genuine progress with Well, You Have To Understand That In The Real World We Have To Make Hard Choices. The one who looks at you disapprovingly when you mention expectations and higher standards, who tells you scornfully to Grow Up.
I find myself feeling disappointed almost constantly now. I find myself feeling tricked, deceived, betrayed, and trapped. I mean, what am I going to do?
It's not like I'm going to vote for McCain.
The problem is, Obama can lose this election, and this is how he can do it. The Democrats were guaranteed a win this November, a great big win, as long as they played it safe. Had the Democrats run any charismatic white man they had for President, they were a lock for the White House and huge Democratic gains in both Houses. All they had to do was stick to the script, don't shake things up, go for the sure thing, and, well, they were a sure thing.
Yet they -- we -- chose not to do that. We had the audacity to hope. We went outside the box. We decided to roll the big dice, to go double or nothing -- to not simply settle for taking over the government again, but to really try for something historical. The only thin desperate shred of hope the Republicans had was that the Democrats would try to elect either a non-white or a woman to the Presidency, and like suckers in Vegas down to our last borrowed nickel, we went for it.
Having dared to dare, our daring nominee now dares nothing further... and that's a losing strategy. If we were going to play it safe we'd have nominated John Edwards... and if we'd nominated John Edwards, he'd have gone off in our faces like some rusty piece of left over WWII ordinance we stumbled over in the dark on our way to the polling places in November. We didn't play it safe. We chose the big risk.
Yet now, our big risk has decided to ease back on the throttle, to pump down the volume, to be inoffensive, to keep it real. Instead of playing to win, he's doing his best not to lose. Like it's in the bag. Like we can't possibly blow this one, as long as we're careful and don't make any errors.
Can we lose this election.
Yes, we can.
Oh my, yes we can.








Comments (8)
Welcome to politics.
Clue-in: the vast majority of the electorate is not as 'left' as you are. Even Kucinich couldn't muster a single delegate in the Dem Primary.
By the way, if you've paid any attention at all, Obama has always been from the moderate side of the Dem Party... not the Kucinich side.
Here's how it works: win the primaries, then win the general. Two different games with two different strategies.
Also, one must pick and choose the battles. Obama has a presidency to win. Should he win, he'll have far more influence on FISA and privacy protection than he ever would have by spending his time in an ultimtely futile (and politically risky) fillibustering of the FISA bill, for example.
He's good. Have a little faith. Worried about losing? Send more money. Volunteer for a phone bank. Do something constructive instead of undermining your only shot at winning by turning potential supporters off to Obama with your negative assessments of him.
August 25, 2008 6:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZLrFn7cu1I
I'm sick and tired of hearing things from
Uptight short sided narrow minded hypocritics
all i want is the truth, just give me some truth
i've had enough of reading things
by neurotic psykotic pigheaded politicians
all i want is the truth, just give me some truth
No short heared yellow bellied
son of tricky dicky's
gonna mother hubbard soft soap me
with just a pocket full of hopes
its money for dope, money for rope
(guitar solo)
No short heared yellow bellied
son of tricky dicky's
gonna mother hubbard soft soap me
with just a pocket full of hopes
its money for dope, money for rope
i'm sick to death of seing things from
tight lipped colasilick mamas little chuvanist
all i want is the truth, just give me some truth
i've had enough of watching scenes from
Skezofronic ego centric peranoid primadonnas
all i want is the truth just give me some truth.....
August 25, 2008 7:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Would John Edwards have been your safe, charismatic, white man? Jeesh.
August 25, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I wanted Feingold to run but even my truly left-wing heart knows that there are still too many red states for that to happen.
Politics is the art of the possible. Sometimes you have to make incremental steps instead of one great leap and I think Obama is definitely on the right path.
August 25, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know what, Doc? On a purely emotional level, I totally relate. I was disappointed w/ Obama's Veep pick and I've been disappointed with more than one of his decisions in recent months. But rationally - he's still our guy. He may not be everything we wish he'd be, he may not assume every position exactly as we'd like, but in the end, he's the guy we want running this country - certainly over McCain. Gotta look at the bigger picture here. Sucks to have to compromise, but if we don't give up some ground to win the White House, we lose it all to the Repubs. And I don't think any of us want that.
August 25, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Carol, I agree w/ everything except the last sentence. I think some people DO want that. The most vocal group are the Hillary diehards, then 2ndly the people who are clinging to their "perfect world" hopes. All these people have admirable motives. However, the net result is that they may well cost us the election.
There may have been times in the past when things were looking pretty darn good in the world, the loss wasn't too hard to swallow, and the country did okay in spite of it. We've survived more than one less than wonderful President.
I don't believe this is one of those times. We are at a critical point when the next President may well have the opportunity to get us into a nuclear war. Who do you think is most apt to do that? A calm, thoughtful man, or hot-head who'd rather just bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran and let God sort 'em out?
I am not doom and gloom about this election. I truly believe in Obama, I believe in our ability to sway portions of the population to vote with us. I'm hoping that the media will wake up and stop playing fast and loose w/ the future of the country for the sake of excitement and ratings, and start a debate on the issues. BUT that's not going to happen if those people that are willing to let McCain win and HOPE we get another crack at in 2012 don't get on board. Let's hope "we" don't have to get the President "they" deserve.
August 25, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No thanks. I'm tired of dogmatic ideology. If you want to prescribe to such, go ahead. But don't expect to make progress on the way.
August 25, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that's all fine and dandy. Now shut up, get out, start canvassing, register voters and make sure people actually vote for Obama. That will be infinitely more useful to your cause than pondering whether Obama is quite left enough for your sensibilities. The real danger are not PUMAs (they're a figment of the GOPs imagination, largely), but armchair lefties.
August 26, 2008 4:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment