« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
McCain Fails Presidential Test
Every four years, the pundits point out that the nominated candidates' first major "presidential" test is the selection of a vice presidential candidate. That selected person must have the experience and gravitas to step in should the elected president become unable to continue in office.
John McCain failed miserably in this test. His choice of Sarah Palin is an obvious pander to the perceived disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporters. Does anyone believe that a candidate whose longest term in public office is a couple of stints as a city council member in a town of 7000 is ready to be Commander in Chief? And this running mate is campaigning with the oldest person ever to run for president?
This is not America first. This is political pandering at its worst.
Now, the Right will claim that Obama is only three years older and has not much more experience on the national level. The difference is that Obama has run a 19-month campaign and has been elected by his party to head the ticket. Millions of people, your humble blogger included, has voted for him and donated to him. He has effectively earned his position by gathering this support. McCain's VP choice, however, is merely a tactical choice, a pander, to bolster a flagging candidate for president. Let's quiz Sarah Palin on world leaders and conditions, this person who thinks creationism should be taught in the classroom.
Hillary needs to jump in. She's a definite heavyweight; she needs to put down this pretender.
Comments (2)
We need to stay away from whacking Palin, unless you are excited about McCain winning.
Paul Begalia hit the nail on the head when he said that we need to hit McCain's judgment, not her. It is not her fault that McCain picked her. Paul Begalia said that McCain made a "shockingly irresponsible" decision, and that is what should be questioned, not her.
August 30, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Begala (can't believe I'm quoting him) also said something that stuck with me: Would you make a will that says in the event of your death your children should go to and be raised by someone -- anyone!! -- that you had met only once?? Then how can he leave the welfare of the entire country to her? ---------- He also used the work that I think describes this best: "reckless"
Hillary could do a wonderful ad, if she would. Thanking Palin for her nod but saying that electing someone who is anti-choice, anti-equal pay, doesn't believe in climate change, etc. would NOT represent any advance for women ... or any other citizens. -- And then turning to John McCain and chiding him for his insult to HER supporters.
I still cannot believe he did this. Can't even blame the GOP because I do not believe any major people in the party would have agreed to this decision. Maverick or maniac?
August 30, 2008 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment