Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

John McCain is a Racist

McCain can legitimately take a lot of hits for the nonsense he's pulled in trying to win the 2008 presidential election. His Straight Talk Express has been superseded by the How Do I Get All of You to Vote for Me? Express. He was inspirational in 2000; that's why he wasn't elected, and he's figured that out.

His attack ad comparing Barack Obama to Paris Hilton and Britney Spears was low. Though he brandishes a very legitimate point about the cult of celebrity surrounding the first-term senator from Illinois, he was way out of line in picking two of the most controversial and derided pop-culture stars of our day. And attacks on Britney Spears are just uncalled for. She's ill; she should not be the fodder for anyone's jokes or pointed barbs. (And admit it: some of you were among the tasteless joke-makers. But I digress).

However, it was Obama who said something along the lines that McCain doesn't trust him because he doesn't look like the other presidents on our paper currency. This wasn't only low - it is patently untrue. And it's not something I expected from Obama.

Oh, I know... Obamaniacs are going to quote McCain's opposition to the national MLK Ho0liday, back in the day. They'll dredge up his "gook" comment from 2000. They'll remind us that he's hired campaign strategists that conducted race-baiting campaigns for people like Dubya.

But McCain atoned for his MLK Day mistake; though his stated reasons for not voting for it when it first came up in his home state of Arizona have been evasive, it's really immaterial. He's never made a public anti-black or Jewish or Latino comment in his life. Many archconservatives have been outraged at McCain precisely because he's never done this.

He was tortured for 5 years by Vietnamese combatants. I understand his anger at them. Hey, you want to argue that he bears a grudge against Vietnamese in general, okay. I won't get into that with you... Except to say that there are an awful lot of Black Americans who bear a grudge against White Americans, and that's often accepted as perfectly understandable in this culture.

But John McCain is not racist toward blacks, or Latinos... he hasn't even made any questionable remarks regarding Arabs or Muslims. In fact, he's gone out of his way to denounce commentary this is race-baiting... like when Fox News repeatedly referred to Obama by his full name, "Barack Hussein Obama."

The people he's hired are there to get him elected, and there have been many reports that he's had his differences with them. He's a man who wants to be president - just like Obama. They've both learned that means choking back a little on previous positions and statements.

Now I know there are those who are going to reply with quotes and such culled from the Internet to point out how wrong I am. I don't have the inclination to spend my time micromanaging third-party quotes, so thanks in advance for the help. But the point of all this is both McCain and Obama have been disappointing since they've sown up their respective party nominations.

I don't see any of the "change" Obama keeps talking about. He drew first blood when it came to racial politics. McCain drew first blood when it came to the politics of the insipid. All I can say right now is that McCain has more of a proven track record; Obama does not. But that doesn't give any indication of my vote this November.

Wow. what a choice.

Oh? That title I wrote way up there? Why, we are talking about baiting, aren't we??


Comments (13)

avatar

You are confused when you say that Obama drew first blood regarding racial politics. Obama is the last person to want race to become an issue. Why? Because he has nothing to gain by it and everything to lose.

Any allusion to the issue of race by Obama are defensive in nature. They are constructed to help keep race from being used against him. To draw racial first blood, as you describe it, would be an attempt to use an opponents race against him, or your own race to help yourself. Obama did not either.

This issue isn't whether McCain is a racist, its whether he or his campaign and surrogates are cynically leveraging the racism in others. This is what Bill Clinton was trying to do against Obama at key moments in the Dem. primary. No one believes Bill Clinton is racist, but he WAS perceived as attempting to blow the dog whistle of closet bigots. African Americans immediately recognized what he was attempting. It left them very surprised and deeply disappointed in the first "black" president.

For a more obvious example of the tactic I'm talking about just look at the history of Sen. Strom Thurman. Here was a man who's long political career was based on appealing to bigots and segregation-ism, all while having secretly fathered his first born child with a black woman. Hypocrites such as this are more contemptible than sincere bigots.

Good commentary. But irrelevant to what I wrote. The issue of race is a double-edged sword. Anyone can stand to gain or lose from it.

If there are racists in McCain's campaign - and there are - don't blame him for that. Or have you forgotten the lesson of Jeremiah Wright?

If there are racists in Obama's campaign - and there are - don't blame them for the words that issued from Obama's mouth.

And I have no idea how you mean to use the word "surrogate" here.

avatar

To those liberals who wish to read race-free, kick-ass analysis, check out Media Matters' Eric Boehlert, the Daily Howler's Bob Somerby, and Salon.com's Glen Greenwald. You will rarely, if ever, see the aforementioned giants accusing John McCain of playing the race card. They leave that to gossip-mongers such as Arianna Huffington, Bob Herbert, Keith Olbermann, Josh Marshall and the like.

McCains record is exactly why I will never vote for the warmonger.

avatar

I'm sorry to say, again, that you are confused. You seem to have missed my point entirely. I'll try to restate it.

I'm not suggesting that McCain has bigots in his campaign. He may have none. My point is that his campaign is exercising a strategy to leverage the fears/bigotry of susceptible voters.

McCain's campaign has rapidly degenerated to cultivating multiple forms of voter fear and bigotry. McCain can and should be held accountable for this strategy.

Lastly, by surrogates I mean, right-wing talk radio, the guy who opened a rally for McCain awhile back who kept emphasizing Obama's middle name, GOP strategist hacks on TV, GOP state party organizations, the jackasses on Fox News, etc, etc, etc. Fear/hate mongers all.

avatar

Didn't McCain condemn the guy who emphasized Obama's middle name? And what control does John McCain have over Fox News?

avatar

You don't seriously believe that there is no coordination beween Fox and the GOP. Scotty Mac just told us all otherwise. Right?

avatar

The McCain that disavowed that guy has clearly disappeared. What happened to McCain, "the principled one". So much, for him having the courage of his convictions. Funny, how being behind in the polls changes some people.

avatar

Oh, and one other point. You are also wrong when you say "The issue of race is a double-edged sword. Anyone can stand to gain or lose from it."

This is obviously false. In a nation where only about 10% are black, and with a history of having enslaved only blacks, being a black candidate does not cut equally both ways. Any positive is far outweighed by the negative.

"Select from the numerous web, blog and news sites listed here, go there, and make your opinions supporting John McCain known. Once you’ve commented on a post, video or news story, report the details of your comment by clicking the button below. After your comments are verified, you will be awarded points through the McCain Online Action Center."


So, Mark, how many points did you get for this one?

No Points. It's amazing how one can be so cynical on one hand and so naive on the other. I don't go for points - (but thanks for researching the 3rd party quote!) I stake out my own territory, following my conscious and trying to work out the issues.

These people (Fox, talk show hosts, etc.) are not "surrogates". Educated people really should try to know the definitions of the words they utilize.

Last thing: don't make excuses or pander to an entire culture. That is the most hypocritical thing I've ever read. You demean African Americans with your patronizing attitude. It's not "them" and "us". We're all "us".

avatar

Of course they are. Pull out a Websters. One of the def. of Surrogate is a "substitute for another". But perhaps, hatchet-men, or flying-monkeys would have been more descriptive.

Meanwhile, where's your response to my substantive points refuting all of your arguments?

Well, ya got me pardner. I'll fess up that I'm saving up enough points to get one of those purple plastic penile Elvises. Or maybe you could lend me yours?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address