« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
It's His Ego, Not His Race
It's Obama's inflated ego the McCain campaign is using against him, not his race.
Here's the latest.
This one follows ads lampooning the MSM's adulation of Obama and his celebrity status.
Obama made the mistake of trying to change the subject to race when the celebrity ad aired. He needs to stay cool when he addresses the el mano poderosa ad.
Now, as someone who has been severely lampooned myself, I feel for Obama, and I think I can give him some advice.
First of all, I'd say, McCain just made a fool out of you. Don't dwell on it. Whatever you do, don't torture yourself with pictures of old John McCain rolling on the floor laughing every time Charlton Heston bellows: "Behold his powerful hand!" You'll just make yourself sick. Bright guys like us get really upset when the dummies get in a shot. Get over it.
Second, don't whine or complain that the ad takes a cheap shot by using one of your few attempts at humor against you. I know it's irritating that they used about the only joke you've ever told on yourself to ridicule you, but that's what campaigns do. And don't fall into the trap of explaining that you were joking and they made fun of your joke. That's lame.
So what can you do? Keep laughing at yourself, and at McCain. Hire some joke writers. In the meantime, don't be afraid to steal a joke or two. Stealing jokes will put you in the tradition of great comedians. Go for it.
Here's one that's been making the rounds on the web. You can touch it up to vex old McCain.
When I was in Germany, Andrea Merkel said: Barack, why are you running? How can you win? You're a lawyer, married to a lawyer. McCain is a war hero, married to a woman with big breasts and a brewery. How can there be a contest?
See how McCain likes those apples.








Comments (49)
If you think Cindy has big breasts, you sure must wear some very high magnification glasses.
A Question:
Why is McCain allowed to use the pictures of Paris and Britney in Commercials? I thought that entertainers own the complete rights to their images, and can not be used, without their consent, in TV Commercials.
Shouldn't those two people be able to sue McCain for theft of commercial serices?
August 1, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
The same thing crossed my mind. I don't know about suing, because they're so famous, but they could at least complain. I heard they were Republicans. Maybe they're taking one for the team. Actually, I think Obama will adjust in time for the debates. It is inconceivable to me that he could lose this election.
August 1, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy accusing someone ELSE of having delusional ego problems?
LOL!
This one goes in my "classics" file.
August 2, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
When I saw the title of this blog, I was sure Billy was referring to himself in the third person.
August 2, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The person who should be upset about stolen ideas is Jon Stewart. He used the whole bit, including Charlton Heston as Moses, already on the Daily Show.
That's right! The McCain camp can't even come up with their own Obama put-downs without help from the media.
Paris Hilton's parents gave McCain $4600, so Stewart awarded him the "Dick Move of the Week" for using her in his other dumb ad.
He also came up with a clever new McCain slogan, since McCain clearly has no ambition:
August 2, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=178207&title=dick-move-of-the-week-mccain
August 2, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
The use of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton in the ads is probably well within the law.
Political speech is accorded even more first amendment protection than commercial speech (although the current supreme court is trying to protect commercial speech as well...) .
Spears and Hilton are, undoubtedly, very public figures. Because of this their images can be used in all manner of ways that a private citizen's might not be. They could try to sue, but they would in all likelihood loose after a protracted court battle -- and if if they won, they wouldn't be able to prove any personal damages - using their images to make fun of them as pop culture figures is very much protected speech (Stewart, Colbert et al prove that daily with their send-ups of all sorts of politicians and entertainers.)
The only way the use of their images would be illegal would be
1.) If the campaign falsely represented them (for example, by claiming falsely claiming they endorsed McCain (or Obama)
2.) If their images were used for commercial purposes (selling a product) without their consent and compensation. That's why you can't see companies usurping popular celebrity images to sell their product. If this prohibition wasn't in place, can't you just image the amazing ways that Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, the Beckhams, and every other popular celebrity would be used in ads without their consent.
3.) They could sue for libel -- for example, if McCain issued an ad that said that Spears or Hilton were criminals, space aliens, anthrax attackers, prostitutes, too stupid to live, or any other defaming statement. But as public figures, it would be very very difficult for them to successfully sue in an American court - they would have to prove not only that the statements were false, but the were maliciously intended, and that serious personal damage resulted. That kind of high bar is why you don't see very many celebrities successfully suing the tabloids (although it is much easier to do in the UK and Ireland, so some celebrities' lawyers will go court shopping there).
The first amendment -- it protects all kinds of speech, even when it is stupid and that demeans public figures.
August 2, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
He is just having some fun:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6bc9e_obamaone1
August 1, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, wrong link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2055107/posts
I blog with the right on other blogs and they have a "different" type of sense of humor.
They love stuff like this.
August 1, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
How shocking to hear that you "blog with the right."
Perhaps Billy does as well.
August 2, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
So far Obama is coming off like the Church Lady.
August 1, 2008 9:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy!! I actually liked this post!!!!!
Love,
One of Your Personal Trolls
August 1, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, Billy, Obama really needs adbice from YOU!
August 1, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very interesting post.
I believe the target of the McCain campaign is to paint Barack as other. He's not like you. In this case he's not like you the same way Paris and Briney are not like you. It's a caricature for sure. The campaign is not going to go near race or religion, they will be happy that the internet and the not no whispered campaign has this taken care of. But reinforcing the "otherness" of him on any one characteristic lends support to all the other ways the voters want to believe he is too different. The other day McCain called him and extremist. When asked if he was a socialist, e said he didn't know. Rove's imagery of the aloof guy at the club with the pretty girl on is arm making fun of you. It's not only about race, but for some it will be.
ANy way what can you do about it? Billy makes some good suggestions. Humor, both self-deprecating and mocking McCain (although not cruelly) can be effective. It doesn't make sense to raise the fact that McCain seems to have an issue with gambling. Instead just say something about his $500 shoes. Make it a joke, though.
The other thing is Obama has to change the imagery. He doesn't need big rallies, anymore. He can pull that of whenever he wants. There is tons of film footage of him "looking presidential". I'd love to see him fly to Arizona, visit the Navajo reservation, talk to the folks there and then turn to the reporters and say, after 8 years this is George Bush and John McCain's America. ( or alternatively after 27 years in Congress this is John McCain's Arizona). Then fly down to the southern border of Texas where people actually live without running water. Talk to the folks. Just listen to them. No speeches. Except to turn to the camera and say this is George Bush's America. A union hall in Detroit. A crumbling high school in Milwaukee. A Budweiser factory in St. Louis. (OK take a page from the Clinton's. Hell, take Bill with him.)
The coda to this is that Obama can do the sunny optimism, the Reaganesque view of American promise in a way that McCain really can never pull off. This is where Obama gets to pivot on his differentness--his only in America is my story possible stuff--and to use his oratorical ability. First show America how far we have been moving in the wrong direction, then give them an image of it's possibilities.
Start with humor as Billy suggested then get deadly serious.
August 1, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was McCain who was the American Indians' "friend".
August 2, 2008 5:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gawd, you're such a jerk. You lured us in with a title bound to make us storm in flamethrowers lit and ready, and then it turns out you wrote a pretty good blog.
Oh well, at least we've still got gotalife to be mad at.
August 1, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy,
This is a sincere message to say that I think you make some good points.
August 2, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a post! I'm somewhat speechless, which for me is a hard and rare place to be.
I had to run and breathe on the mirror to make sure I had not died and gone to heaven.
August 2, 2008 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
A more interesting question for Billy: Whom do you identify with more, Obama, Paris or Britney?
Barack does a number of things well. Humor is not one of them. McCain's ads are laughable, though not for the intended reasons. Just the kind of stupid shit that gets people elected in this country. Still, as an unrepentant Clinton supporter, I'd say McCain is making the same points she tried but more pointedly, and with a lighter touch.
August 2, 2008 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama, of course. You?
August 2, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uhh, the botox queen looks pretty flat-chested to me. And McCain's gonna have to work a little harder to be the war hero turned fuckup that Duke Cunningham turned out to be.
But! As you say, there is the brewery. So how can there be a contest?
August 2, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain ad is funny,perfectly OK campaign tactics and my gut feeling is it won't cost Obama a single vote.
I'm with Billy in saying that Obama should
neither critcize it not try to top it with humor of his own. When asked just say he enjoyed its humor.
In college I put out a faux college newspaper mimicking the paper of our traditional opponent.
My school didn't like it and had me send an apology to the opponent's President whom we had charactitured.
He replied
" I enjoyed the humor in the Mymic". Which of course implied that it wasn't all enjoyable.
Score on for their side.
August 2, 2008 7:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Chancellor of Germany is ANGELA Merkel.
While I'm hesitant to say Obama has an inflated ego, I will agree that probably the best course of action is to stay above it, not make it look like it affects you, basically just shrug it off, wipe the dirt from your shoulders and move on.
It's easy to get sucked into these types of games and hard to get out of them.
August 2, 2008 8:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Having one [a big ego] and being perceived to have one are two different things.
Some good recommendations as to self-deprecating humor. I'm sure we will see more of that. Thats good advice.
But easy on the reactivity. We would be wasting time and giving free airplay (and thus subtle validation) to all the swipes (conman, empty suit, egotist, would-be-Hitler, dangerous liberal, youthful naif, angry black reparationist, "Obammunist", cultural elitist, and so on ad infinitum and ad nauseum) by trying to answer all of them.
Best to keep the foot light on the defensive reaction gas pedal. I like the sunny optimism remark above. That and self deprecating humor. Both communicate at a fundamental level, self-confidence and ego strength. Alpha qualities. And we usually elect Alphas.
August 2, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
fyi, Obama has come out against reparations.
August 2, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The one was heckled and now against apologizing for slavery and reparations to prove the hecklers right.
The one is the establishment.
August 2, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
That makes no sense.
August 2, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact is of the matter is that the Obama campaign wasted the last three days with this nonsense, and now it is what simmers during the quiet weekend. Surprising and disappointing display from a fairly tight campaign. I think the worldwide tour took the campaign off kilter. And Josh Marshall and the gang of outraged bloggers, respectfully, didn't help him this week (although folks like Josh like to tell us that helping Obama is not their function (yawn)).
My next step would be to choose the VP soon, probably pre-Olympics. Let us Clinton folks be pissed for a few days, have the Olympics, and come out ready for the convention and the election. There is not a single VP pick out there that is going to please the hardcore Clinton faction, and that, rightly or wrongly, will dominate the news for a couple of days when we should be talking about how great a pick it was for Obama.
And then Obama's got to be tough, real tough for the duration, because like it or not folks until this election is won he is NOT above it all.
My prediction is that Senator Obama will actually lose this thing if he begins to focus on silly campaign ads. His focus needs to be core economics; he's got to know the price of milk. Now at the same time his surrogates need to pound John McCain silly, with ridicule and with punch. They need to put McCain on his heels and they need to do it constantly. I do think they need to be careful about the age stuff, but I don't mind turning an angry McCain into a Dennis the Menace Mr. Wilson-type (as Chris Matthews put it).
Folks, this is the big leagues. Nobody , not even regular people, like to see anyone placed on a pedestal before their time and in the midst of a scrap. It's time for Senator Obama to prove that he has balls, really. Whining about negative campaign adds and suggestions of racism didn't take us very far this week. It was a dumb week of campaigning, and it cost.
August 2, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good comment!
Just a small tactical disagreement.
Put off the veep selection until as late as possible.
What's going on right now, in the back and forth between the two campaigns is not so important absent a major scandal discovery. [Knock on wood.]
What is most important is the dynamic in effect right before election day. We MUST be perceived to be on a roll.
The veep selection is a way of generating momentum, energy, and enthusiasm. We should save it till later so some of the residuals are still working in November.
Cautious Lux.
August 2, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. I'm suggesting that Obama get the VP out of the way because: (a) it's not going to be Clinton, or so we all undestand that it won't be her, and so there will be, rightly or wrongly, a focus on the angriest of the Clinton supporters, (and I confess that I won't be pleased emotionally and politically but like most Clintonistas I'll deal and get over it); and (b) therefore, get it out of the way and let the VP pick earn his stripes at the convention when angry Clinton folks are far more likely to be old news, and everyone else will have chilled. In short, the problem I have with a late selection is that it will have the Clinton anger factor coincide in time with the convention. There's going to be enough tension. Do it now.
August 2, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Should be: "let the VP nominee earn his or her stripes. . ."
August 2, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do we know that Clinton might not be asked, and accept?
I have been running it through, and am not convinced that Clinton may not yet get the nod.
She would be a formidable addition to the ticket. But I suppose you are right.
I have been pushing Debbie Wasserman Schultz, but that doesn't seem to picking up any traction.
I worry about momentum issues and also oppo-research issues and the erosion in the media of any candidate, once announced.
There is a "rate" of erosion that may be somewhat fixed (absent scandal discoveries of course) and the shorter time a candidate is exposed to it, the better for her, or him.
Otherwise agree completely.
August 2, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, O'Doc. As you know, I can't reply to you directly with that apostrophe in your name. Angela. Also, it's a mighty hand, not a powerful one. Oh, for an edit. Does Obama have an inflated ego? I had assumed they were moving his acceptance speech outside to accommodate it.
August 2, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. I understand that accepting outdoors is not quite unprecedented, but it sure doesn't convey humility.
August 2, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's moving the acceptance speech outdoors to let the people who are going to vote for him (or not) hear it, not the party regulars and hacks who attend the convention the way Hollywood attends the Oscars. If you think there's something wrong, I'd love to know what it is.
And by the way, noboduy's ego gets them crowds in the tens of thousands. And nobody's ego can turn them into a celebrity. Usually, ego turns you into a jerk and very little else.
People went to Woodstock because they wanted to hear the bands. And like it or not, people go to hear Obama because they want to.
August 2, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps he should accept in a broom closet?
With sackcloth and ashes on his head?
Sarcasm aside, I agree that the stadium is a bad choice. Not because it somehow conveys megalomania or vaunting egotism-the Nuremburg rallies are a long way in the past and God forbid all our political functions be reduced to townhall meetings in school libraries for fear of appearing too grandiose.
But because it will be portrayed as such and thus act as a cooler.
August 2, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point.
August 2, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I may be an idiot, and my associates often think I am, but its just not prima-facie apparent to me that Obama has got a swelled head.
What is that perception based on? Actions? Statements? Mannerisms?
What are the data points?
August 2, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lux Umbra, when its not racist-based, it's based on the envy that a bunch of wanna be white guys feel for a black guy who's making the country (or at least a large part of it) and the EU swoon. It's the white like me vs. the other phenomenon, and I suspect there's a whole string of bulbs that light up in the white American male in the face of Big Sam as our potential new number one.
For the most part (or at least in regard to the posters here), this isn't exactly racism. I don't say that these white guys sitting around posting really would prefer to see Obama on a front porch somewhere spitting watermelon pits. But they sure do seem resentful of his ability to draw the crowds.
So there is something happening here for sure, Mr. Jones, and this becomes even more evident in that it is by and large (other than the female media hacks who spout whatever story line is the flavor of the day, no matter or mind involved) NOT women who are raising this big ego complaint.
Women, from what all I can tell, mostly just think Obama's great. And perhaps therein lies the rub.
August 2, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the insights, anna am. This is a historic election and I think we are surely going to see the best and worst as well as everything in-between come out during and after.
Obama is breaking the barriers and he will actually be judged more severely for it, rather than less, I imagine. The country is entering new territory: a 200+ year european-american lock on the presidency is coming to an end.
And people have grown up enough now, to know that it doesn't mean that american life-as-we-know-it is going away.
August 2, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude - it's a funny post, but -
does anyone seriously think that anyone who decides that he or she can actually be the Leader of the Free World does not have a huge ego?
How many politicians have you known?
This post is funny, Billy, but so very Obvious that it just isn't quite up to your usual standards of snark. The whole thing goes with out saying.
August 2, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was part of the Bob Bullock machine. Does he count as a politician?
August 2, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Britney is a Republican, and just like her, McCain also dropped his panties for George W. Bush.
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/V/D/2/britney-obama.jpg
August 2, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think the outdoor acceptance speech has to do with ego. I think it's a campaign tactic. I mean, there is a campaign on.
Not that Obama doesn't have an ego; they all do, including McCain. As Jon Stewart says, "If you're running for President and you don't think you're better than everyone else, then what the fuck are you doing??"
August 2, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ego and celebrity aren't a problem if the candidate can convince Americans that he understands that the election is about THEM. If the Democratic Party can't decide what it stands for and can't figure out what it wants to deliver to the American people, at minimum Obama better find himself a Peggy Noonan to write lines like "It's morning in America..." and do pretty ads with Americans doing productive happy things in America. If it's about Obama and a rock concert crowd, he's going to lose.
August 2, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd love to see a lefty viral vid taking McClown at his word on for his 'just having some fun' bit.
Suggested text might include "Running for President or Class Clown?", with accompanying Krusty the Clown visuals.
If he wants to play the clown, then he should wear the whole costume, big red nose and all. See how he likes that. Would make for a good response line to anything he says from this point forward: "Is this another one of your silly jokes?"
If I had the editing capabilities, I'd go for it myself. Instead, I'll put it out there for someone who wants to run with it.
Call a clown a clown.
August 2, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Best post in while Billy!
And after talking to some Republicans down in the South who are a little more on the Liberitarian side of things, I would concur that many of them have a problem with his apparent ego. They have a problem with Bush's ego too over the lat eight years, they liked Bush I a bunch better. That said McCain seems to show a bunch of ego as well, the difference is that his rhetoric sounds more simple and direct than Obama's which is more nuanced and vague at times. When people say why should I support Obama, I point them to his website, I point them to his life story, and then we start discussing issues.
August 2, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure he'll settle down after the convention. He misplayed the race angle a little this time, maybe, but, compared to some of the Progressive bloggers, he sounds rational and centered. McCain doesn't seem to be getting under his skin.
August 2, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's have a single example of Obama's "inflated ego", OK, hot dog. You're full of shit as usual.
August 3, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment