Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

It's Gonna Happen, And When It Does, We Need To Be Prepared

During the primary, the polls were all over the place. Sometimes McCain was ahead. Sometimes Obama was ahead. Hillary was always that outlier, preventing a poll surge for Obama. As soon as he clinched the nomination, the surge happened. It was completely expected for those who actually paid attention.

Then the polls started to drop for Obama, and rise for McCain. They've pretty much leveled off. Because of the Democratic Convention about to begin, and Joe Biden now officially Obama's running mate, the polls will most likely sway in Obama's favor over the next week or so.

Then the Republican Convention will come just one week later, and things will get skewered. Very skewered. When they do, we have to be fully prepared for what's going to happen: McCain will get a boost in the polls, perhaps even truly overtaking Obama for the first time since he clinched the nomination.

Anyone who does not accept this as even a possibility is in denial. But I can imagine many of you don't even think of such things regularly. I, unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on the perspective) think too much of them.

When McCain starts having a better showing in the polls, we need, absolutely not, let it get us down. Morale is a huge factor in keeping the hope alive. Morale has been plaguing the Republicans this entire Election cycle. Let's not let is plague us.

We need to not declare that the fight is over. We need to put things into perspective, and most of all, we need to fight harder than ever to make sure Obama surges ahead of McCain when the post-Convention poll skewering finally subsides. We need to unite, stronger than ever, campaig harder than ever, and donate more than ever.

I know. Polls don't really matter, especially national ones, and especially not after the Conventions. But that won't matter to the MSM. They won't say, "we need to put things into perspective that until the end of September, these polls are very inaccurate." Instead, they'll continue to feed us bollocks about how McCain is finally the "frontrunner", etc. And people, as much as they say they don't pay attention to polls, feel the burn when polls come out unfavorably for their side. It's hard not to when the MSM touts them as empirical fact, rather than a rough statistical snapshot.

You know, it would be wonderful if it didn't happen. If Obama stayed ahead the entire time. I hope I'm proven wrong. But in the scenario that I'm not, let us not forget the truth behind the curtain of polls.


Comments (71)

What do you think polls measure?

The ratio of Total Fucking Idiots in the population? I seriously cannot comprehend the mindset of the people who are actually swayed by some of these ads, or conventions, or what have you. But then, I am clearly an elitist.

avatar

I agree, it kills me that so many idiots have the ability to vote when they clearly do not have the ability to think without an ad telling them how they should feel.

We need to not declare that the fight is over.

Did you say "over"?  Nothing is over until we decide it is!  Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

Germans?

"Animal House" reference....

avatar

Good grief, what kind of Loki do you fashion yourself as when you don't even get the "Germans bombed Pearl Harbor" reference?

They're, for the most part, "a rough statistical snapshot," as I said. They give an indication of how things are at the time in which they're taken. But they're not predictive, they change on a regular basis, many different polling organizations frequently return with very different numbers.

But I know when (if?) the time comes where McCain is up in the polls, whether they truly matter or not, everyone will be up in arms about it, rather than brushing it off and working harder to counteract that type of defeatism.

Hi Nathan, Just a slight (snark) of contrarian thinking for myself - I don't think the GOP event has the same potential for their party as ours does for us.

Note that many in the GOP are staying away from their own convention out of fear of being associated with the "brand" - I hope and expect that will get some play.

They haven't had a positive message yet this year and I don't see where they're going to get one at this late stage of the game.

Given that they're the incumbent party - should we encourage them to wildly chant four more years! or maybe someone will suggest that they run on returning honor and dignity to the White House. And of course the republicans have been so wildly successful these last few years - and if you doubt that - it's all in your head...

Hope the Obama camp is ready to talk about how McCain opposed the original tax package as unfair and is ready to counter what is really the only message the GOP will have - taxes, taxes and taxes...

Lastly - we should ask whenever the location is in discussion - oh btw is Larry Craig here??

So I think they're playing basketball with a "Dud" Ball - no bounce!

If you can give me any statistical and/or historical evidence to suggest McCain won't get a bounce in the polls from his Convention, I'd love to see it. Otherwise, I'm going to expect one.

I agree that we should expect a bounce from the Republican convention, but I also think that it will not be as widely watched. Their constituents are low information voters, and their message is boring, boring, boring.

If John McCain starts showing 2-3 points ahead of Obama, the MSM is going to report it. Wildly.

avatar

I think the rah rah Nascar pack will think its a reason to party and get their "flag ON". They'll watch TV, drink beer and talk tough about them thar enemies we have to bomb next.
The rethugs will trot out their boogie-man fear, threat from terrists, evil-doers that "mean us harm" and bring in warped and ready war-hero-prisoner-tortured-one and declared how he'll save us all.
We can believe the polls just like we can believe Bushco, and we can believe the MSM, who've manufactured themselves another aghast after aghast to dazzle us with...the truth nowhere in sight.

Last year - Kerry 0% bounce, Bush 2% bounce. Most polls are not within 2 points of accuracy, so truly 2% is not a measurable change.

With a long primary and all the attack ads, America is already well tuned to the Presidential election. That "tuning in" is what traditionally causes the bump. I'm not seeing anything to support predictions of a significant bounce after the convention.

That said, people around here can get themselves all worked up over a 1 point negative move on an August poll with +/- 3.1% accuracy. So good luck encouraging calm (meant both seriously and ironically).

dammit - last election, not last year.

After a little poking around I did find the link listed below. Shows bounce figures from 1960-2004 for booth parties. If you look at the charts; the Dem figures seem pretty erratic over time, whereas the GOP figure trends steadily downward 6 5 4 3 2 etc. So Bush's 2004 Bounce was only 2 pts and Bush's victory margin was the smallest for an incumbent in a century.

As for my earlier post - I was actually just trying to do a humorous take on the kind of things that happen at conventions - the four more years! Chant and wondering out loud - can we ask(?) don't you guys want to have a rousing emphatic endorsement of your President and Your Party on National Teevee??

I agree that we should be absolutely prepared for all eventualities and I respect your work honestly, we both know this is the one election with the highest stakes ever.

http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/print.php?article=LJS2008082101

Respectfully, JHC

I must admit, you took me up on my challenge and I'm quite impressed. Thank you, very much, for that!

Though it does show that there has been a bounce, even if it's been steadily declining. Because of how close these Conventions are to each other, I would suspect that the polling will be erratic, and at times show either one of the two beating the other.

But again, thank you so much! =D That was quite informative.

Not much of anything until week after next. Especially if they use a "likely voter" filter.

avatar

I would like to believe that McCain can't win because he is so obviously a warmonger, a man of limited intelligence, a fatcat whore whose allegiance to the Big Money crowd is so obvious. I would like to believe that. But given that I have seen and heard how rigorously and completely the media controls the message, especially to those who mostly get their political information from the television, and mainly from the mainstream channels, I fear that the message will continue to be "McCain good, Obama bad," like the primitive communications of a Neanderthal.

I'm giving money when I can, but I've decided to contact the Obama website and see if I can do phone calling, especially to my former state of Florida. Oh, how joyful I would be if Florida went for Obama. It would make up for a lot of pain we endured over having our votes stolen twice.

JaneEyrez you'll never convince Repubs or indies to vote for Obama or against McCain by calling him a warmonger, fatcat, or whore. It's ok when you're among friends here but on the phone you will in fact damage our chances. I know it's easy shorthand but you need more civil language when speaking to undecideds who invariably view him as a war hero. Those are loaded terms that will turn them off to you and anyone on our side.

Instead of name calling use specific examples of his bellicosity, his ignorance of world affairs and the tax code, his flip flops on virtually every political position he's ever held. Print 'em up in short easy to read or memorize sentences and make sure you do the same for Obama's positive policies. Have them there in front of you when you make your calls and refer to them when speaking to voters. You'll find you'll not only win people over to Obama but they'll thank you for calling.

avatar

I've done a lot of campaigning, so never fear that I'm not good at identifying and matching the concerns and hopes of people as I talk to them and gently guiding them to a new thought. I was speaking frankly here because I have the freedom and invisibility to do so.

I think even saying such around gets to eyes beyond the junkies who comment. We can beat McCain on the issues and honest analysis of the current situation in America. That shit sells itself.

Problem with being too harsh in denouncing McCain is that many rank and file republicans get tarred with the same brush. It may keep a fence sitter from coming our way out of some misplaced allegiance to a dying political philosophy.

Perhaps a little more high road in the tone and tenor of die-hard Obama supporters would bring more persuadable voters in the center to pull that lever for Barack in November.

If the polls are neck and neck on Nov. 1st, then Obama will win handily. I firmly believe the polls are flawed this season because they don't take into account new and untraditional voters, who are going to come out in force for Obama.

spot-on... these polls are built on a 20th century model and are executd on 20th cxentury technology.

But I doubt that McCain is ever going ot achieve real frontrunner status, even in the traditinal polls. It is simply a miracle of democracy that Obama still holds a lead, and proof that we, as a people, are better than our media wants us to realize.

Tolerance is SO boring... and hard on their ratings. They NEED hateful vitriol to keep their yang up... the thought that Americans are rising above the lesser angels of our nature does not bode well for the sensationalistic soap opera we call the mainstream media.

Indeed they are churning out the narrative however they can.

avatar

Yes, I've been wondering about these polls as well. I and many friends and family members have opted out of regular phone service as we all seem to have 2~4 cells per household anyway and one (or two)from the job. It's purely a cost issue... So, are these pollsters really reaching what could be considered a fair sampling of the population?

Yep, cell phone, email, instant messaging... all newfangled forms of communicating, not to mention getting out the vote, that landlocked telephone pollsters can't handle.

Add to this "likely voter" models factor out anyone who didn't vote in that last two elections. Which means ALL voters under 26 years old.

From what's I've read, John McCain has virtually NO ground game. Meanwhile Barack has been building his organization on the ground in Colorado, Denver, hell even Kentucky.

Doesn't mean this thing is locked up, of course. But it does mean we shouldn't let the polls sway us overmuch.

That's my whole point. Despite their flaws, many people still take them quite seriously. Too seriously, I think.

I think less people take polls seriously these days, despite the media's insistence on shoving them down our throat as justification for their stupid opinions.

avatar

Recommended!

My wife and I are considering staying with my mom in St. Louis on election day and volunteering for Obama. Texas isn't a swing state (yet) and I think Missouri could be in play b/c the polling of untraditional, younger voters and African Americans is flawed.

avatar

Rec'd.

Dems need to be more determined than ever.

I don't care if we have to win thru sheer grit, anger, or whatever, but we must win.

avatar

Rec'd - highly!! This year is not 'trending' in normal fashion, which is reason enough to question the polls, but it is very important that we all keep a steady committment and DO something, every day
-- Donate
-- Sign up to make phone calls in swing states
-- Make plans to go to a swing state and WORK prior to election.
-- Talk (respectfully) to relatives, friends, neighbors. Especially talk to young people and help them keep their enthusiasm (despite encountering the Rep slime machine for possibly the first time)
-- Go to MSM comment sections and put in some respectful and factual comments that to correct some of the misinformation or at least get a few people questioning what they hear.

Do something. And keep up your motivation in whatever way it takes:
-- recognizing that the polls are going to be skewed in McCain's favor (b/c cell phones)
-- remembering the magical success of this 'upstart' in the primaries and believing that this IS something that is going to happen
-- remembering how damn good the Obama campaign has been all along, most recently shown by the better-than-inspired VP selection

.... and even if you're a "worst case" person like me and, in your heart of hearts, don't believe the end result will be anything except far worse heartbreak than in 2004, continually focus on two things:
1) You may believe it won't happen, but you can't be absolutely sure until Nov. 5th, and
2) Since you can't be absolutely sure, if keep on doing everything possible to help Obama and Biden get elected, then AT LEAST you can look yourself in the mirror (or could look Obama or Biden in the eye) and know that you TRIED, that the obscenities resulting from a McCain presidency wasn't helped along by YOUR inaction.

And on an utterly pragmatic level, know that your efforts to promote the top ticket will help in the Senate and House races. If McCain does win, our country's safety may be in the hands of Congress - hopefully a solid Dem. Congress.

Expect a 3 to 6 point bounce in the national polls for Obama as this week unfolds.

Expect McCain to make up that gap next week.

Expect the national polls to fluctate around a 4 to 8 point gap, depending on what the MSM happens to be focusing on at any given time. But, keep in mind that there will remain about 6 to 10% undecided in there, who will break to one side or the other at the last minute, and the polls typically aren't capturing that. Many of these polls also have problems with their "likely voter" models, which are eliminating big chunks of the population that will, likely, make a difference in the outcome.

That doesn't mean, necessarily, that they're worthless. So long as they're using a consistent, albeit flawed, methodology, they serve as an index, of sorts. But, they should be interpreted as such.

I'm more interested in the trends in the State polls and will be watching those and hope that they will be coming out more frequently in the coming weeks. Keep your eyes on those Rust Belt states, the Southwest, and of course, VA and FL. Tracking the EVs is what really matters, in the end.

That doesn't mean, necessarily, that they're worthless. So long as they're using a consistent, albeit flawed, methodology, they serve as an index, of sorts. But, they should be interpreted as such.

I'm more interested in the trends in the State polls and will be watching those and hope that they will be coming out more frequently in the coming weeks. Keep your eyes on those Rust Belt states, the Southwest, and of course, VA and FL. Tracking the EVs is what really matters, in the end.

You're precisely on target, and that's exactly my point. Yet thought WE know this, I know there are many out there, even here on TPM, who worry about every little poll that comes out showing McCain having gained ground, or showing McCain ahead. What I'm saying (and you do quite well) is, put things into perspective before you adopt a defeatist attitude.

I think you are half right here, cowboy. And this is where I'll go out on a limb and say that this time around, the two convention bumps won't follow traditional models.

Obama will get the bitter Hillary voters who are solid Democrats. The potential McCain supporting, wishy-washy, party-loyalty-challenged Hillary supporters will show up on McCain's polls the same time Obama gets his Biden/Convention bounce.

But McCain's got a serious conondrum with voth his VP choice and with his upcomng convention. If it is Romeny, as so many of us anticipate (Flip and Flop on ONE Ticket...OH JOY!) then he gets little bump, he alsready has the billionaire vote, and the evangelicals and catholoic conservativers aren't exactly Romney's base(surely you all know that "Romney" can be misspelled as Merony, which might be mistaken for Moroni, the Mormon angel, if it is properly mispronounced...)

So where's McCain's bounce going to come from?

Independents?

Not as I see it unfolding.

I think the post-convention prognostication tickertapes will show the Obama lead not only growing, but eventually locking in, even in traditional polls.

And with that kind of support, even Rove's voter-caging and suppression tricks, his dirty-blond ads, and his total purchase of McCain's political soul, can't change the outcome.

McCain is the next Bob Dole.

...the two convention bumps won't follow traditional models.

They won't. The Republican Convention is a week after the Democratic Convention. The polls are going to be, for lack of a more effective word, fucked. It's that simple.

I'm not going to trust polls until late September, maybe even early October. No one else should, either. Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight has already said he's making adjustments to the polling done until late September to account for Convention bounces.

Hey, I'm a CowGIRL!

I like your theory, here, and would love to see it play out that way. I tend to predict more conservatively, and then sit back and wait to be delighted if things play out better than expected. :)

Sorry, I didn't look closely at your avatar, and totally missed the Carol...

avatar

I've read that Obama would get another 2-3% from the "cell phone only" crowd so pollsters are adjusting for that in the margin of error.

I expect things to get a bit askew, with polls drifting hither and yon, but although I hope to see McCain hoist by his own petard, I do not expect swordplay, to see anyone run through w/ rapier and skewered like a shish-kebab.

avatar

Agio:

Dream on! Everyone said the same thing about cell phones in 2004 and there was no unpolled Kerry surge. The polling organizations (the good ones at least) are well aware of the problem and the variables in this year's election and adjust for them. The real qeustion is whether any polls before late October have any menaing.

I expect the election to be very close because the U.S. is a very divided nation politically right now. Remember, Bill Clinton was essentially a plurality president. A fairly large slice of what ordinarily might be Democratic leaning voters will vote against Obama because of who he is; and I include in that a lot of bitter Hillary supporters who are using Hillary as cover for their prejudices. So it will continue to be very close right up to November.

Excellent post. The polls are interesting, and I'm addicted to sites like fivethirtyeight.com, but the polls are only part of the story. They're the little wave on the top.

The tsunami is the Obama ground machine that the campaign has been quietly building all summer long. It will be the real story in November.

I've been reading Roger Simon's "Relentless" series over on Politico this morning. One of the most remarkable things is the level of planning that has gone into every stage of Obama's campaign. He truly has a disciplined operation with a lot of long-range thinking and planning. The dysfunction of the Clinton campaign couldn't hold up against it, and I seriously doubt that the flailing McCain operation will be able to either.

Rec'd, Nathan. We need to ignore the snapshot and build the ending of this movie ourselves.

LBJ's Brain, with all due respect, St. Louis will be fine and have record turnout Nov. 4. On the other hand, Springfield and Kansas City, Mo., will need all the help they can get. I'd love to see you here, bro, but the poll rides and phone calls will be needed outstate in GOP territory. I'd recommend Kansas City, since Springfield just doesn't have the core Dem Party organization and experience.

avatar

Thanks Ripper! Good info to have-will take into consideration. Good to hear about the 'Lou...

Springfield does have MSU, which helps make it not quite so dire. I'm in California now but I'm trying to figure out a way to help out there, my home town.

Great post and a great warning. Let's face it, the Republicans will get a boost by going last. They out-timed us on the scheduling. Also, the media will encourage a close race and a McCain surge. The key is not to panic. That old dog will have his day. Let's make sure it happens in September, not November.

avatar

The incumbent party always goes last.

Really? Is that some age old agreement I know nothing about? If so, we should break it.

I think their timing sucks. They get Labor Day, and a short week when a lot of people are out or traveling. They shorten the period in which their lesser money has to work, so that helped them, but our candidates will be out together for the first time during their convention, which may mute its coverage slightly, as we jam the message.

avatar

Thanks Nathan for bringing the hope back, The MSM has had many of us beginning to doubt.

Excellent post. I like your mature view. You're only twenty-years-old? I don't think I had that kind of perspective when I was twenty. Of course, I was saddled with Jimmy Carter's dismal reelection campaign when I was twenty, which depressed the shit out of me. Especially because Ronald Reagan had been my state's governor when I was a kid, and I'd hated him even then! Keep up the good analysis. (But don't let praise get to your young ego.)

: )

avatar

Nathan-

If polls "don't really matter" as you say, then why do campaigns do internal polling?

You also said the media will not say "these polls are inaccurate". Aren't polls accurate at the time they're taken?

I understand you're greater point: to keep things in greater perspective given the timing of the Rebuplican convention. On the polling issue, don't they give us perspective at the time they were taken? It's interesting how many are dismissive of polls when they're tools for us to use in the form of data.

I should have been more specific: national polls don't really matter. Even state polling can have tons of issues with it, because numerous factors aren't taken into account, such as voter registration, GOTV efforts, groundwork organizing, etc. Then we run into the issue of "likely voter" models versus "registered voter" models, especially at this point in time. You run into a lot of trouble with that, most of all when comparing polls, where one uses a strictly "likely voter" model and another a "registered voter" model.

Then, of course, you have to take into account my entire point: polling done during and, for a period of time, after the Conventions, where the accuracy is going to be very, very skewed based on bounces done for each party. Because of how close the Conventions are to each other, that's going to mess things up even more.

But the MSM is not going to report on the details. They will, most likely, as they always do, simply report the numbers of the polls without any true analysis behind it.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com -- solves my problems. Check out what Nate said on the recent CNN poll showing it a tied race: http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/cnn-poll-suggests-trouble-for-obama-but.html

Does that answer your questions?

National polls matter significantly, in that national voting performance matters in an aggregative way.

Put another way, you essentially can't win by losing by more than 3, probably not by losing by more than 1.5 or so. So the question is merely whether national polls can reasonably measure presidential preference, not whether polls matter in some abstract sense. I say they do, and that saying they don't matter is simply acknowledging their imperfection.

The polls reflect that both sides have low ceilings. Assuming this thing stays within 2 points, the real question is whether we leak a blue leaning state (e.g., OR, MN, NH, MI), of which Rasmussen says we have 264 EVs, and if not, if we can move the pile to +1 real vote in any of NV, OH, CO, NC, VA. (I see CO, VA, and NV, in that order, as the best picks to go blue.)

I think the Romney pick would give McCain NV based on superhigh LDS turnout, but would kill McCain in VA, or even maybe NC. 20% of Americans say they wouldn't vote for an LDS Presidential candidate, which is why Obama did best in trial heats in January against Mitt, cracking the mid50s only against Mitt. Bubbas who distrust Obama won't like Mitt, and Mitt won no states in the southeast. It's why I think McCain will take Pawlenty.

I definitely think you're right here, especially about McCain picking Pawlenty. I think there are other reasons behind it, but your analysis is definitely compelling.

ChroNathan, I admire your work. The force is strong with you.

As a respectful suggestion, you should not feed the patronizing drama trolls who post. You should let them play their little anger games in their little poop box by themselves, and stay here in the positive majority of this community. The trolls will not appreciate that Will Smith is trying to reverse their transformation into cannibals. They will merely eat his body when they bust into his basement lab. Or, put another way, this is like the aphorism about wrestling with the pig, except wrestling a pig is much more pleasant, and pigs have much better manners than the drama trolls on TPM.

Thanks, articleman. I admire your work, as well. You were a very strong and rational voice back during the primary, and continue to be.

You're absolutely right, and I will certainly take your suggestion to heart. What we can definitely be appreciative of is the progress Will Smith has made to reversing their transformation. It's a difficult process, but his work has given us hope.

Never feed a troll. Simple as that.

Even poisonous food?

I think there is a possibility that McCain gets a very minimal bounce out of the convention, and that is if Obama's people can tie McCain to the Repub brand. Evidence right now shows that McCain has been able to retain a lot of his "maverick" distance from Bush and Repubs.

On the first day they'll have Cheney speaking in person, and I think Bush via video screen. The repubs know their brand is damaged but they may not be able to help themselves and reinforce the idea that a vote for McCain is a vote for four more years of Bush policies. A barage of ads by Obama highlighting McCain's alignment with Bush may blunt any bounce.

I hear what you are saying about the media taking any small change in the polls and beating us over the head with it, but it is hardly anything new. They have been doing it this entire election season.

I don't find their coverage based on polls had much effect, given that Obama won the primaries. They are paid to give specific opinions, so their veracity is much more than suspect and doesn't appear to resonate with most voters I talk to, both on- and off-line.

I also think the polls are missing 15 to 20 percent of the potential voters in the form of cell phones and perhaps another 10 to 15 percent in new voters. Given the primary turnout, we could easily see 75 or 80 percent in the general election. That has never happened in modern American presidential politics.

There is a counter narrative happening in the country that isn't being communicated via official channels. It has been building to this place for decades. I am quite convinced that The System will finally feel the strength of the absent American voter. For the first time in my lifetime, three generations are motivated to vote all at the same time.

It's going to be a landslide of epic proportions, no matter what the polls or the media might say.

I hear what you are saying about the media taking any small change in the polls and beating us over the head with it, but it is hardly anything new. They have been doing it this entire election season.

I don't find their coverage based on polls had much effect, given that Obama won the primaries. They are paid to give specific opinions, so their veracity is much more than suspect and doesn't appear to resonate with most voters I talk to, both on- and off-line.

I also think the polls are missing 15 to 20 percent of the potential voters in the form of cell phones and perhaps another 10 to 15 percent in new voters. Given the primary turnout, we could easily see 75 or 80 percent in the general election. That has never happened in modern American presidential politics.

There is a counter narrative happening in the country that isn't being communicated via official channels. It has been building to this place for decades. I am quite convinced that The System will finally feel the strength of the absent American voter. For the first time in my lifetime, three generations are motivated to vote all at the same time.

It's going to be a landslide of epic proportions, no matter what the polls or the media might say.

Jason,

I hear what you're saying, but my point is on our reaction to the polls, on our morale as a result of polls that don't favor our side. We can't let negatives get us down at this point. It's too crucial.

As much as we may want to deny that morale plays a part, it really does. We need to stay strong in the face of adversity, even if it seems hopeless. I'm in no way suggesting that it will ever get that bad, but it's critical to keep a positive outlook.

Oh, I don't disagree with the premise of this blog. The whole Chicken Little act is why I didn't become a democrat.

The democratic party has a large fraction, ironically mirrored in number by the crazies on he extreme right, that make any notion of dramatic change much harder because of their tone and their inability to see grays. The modern GOP is no much better, but at least they don't pretend to be otherwise.

It was really a toss-up given the relative corporate corruption and ineffectiveness of both parties, but self-doubt and the circular firing squad on the left was more than enough to make my decision for me.

avatar

If Colin Powell reads my memo we won't have to worry about a GOP bump.

I'm hoping Powell will come out and endorse Obama. If he did that, McCain would have a HUGE hurdle to overcome.

Nathan,

Totally Rec'd. This post is exactly the type of discourse I was referring to yesterday. I watched Michelle's speech and rushed online to see the comments.

Does not look like you have commented regarding the amazing speech tonight with Nancy/Ted and then a spectacular finish by Michelle... if the rest of the convention is half as good as the first night that project of a 16 pt bounce by the McCain team might come to fruition....

once again... great stuff...

Thanks

OBAMA/BIDEN 08 12

McCain will get a Barack-sized convention bounce the day the Boss performs at HIS nominating night. Or when hell freezes over, whichever comes first.

Sorry... meant 16 pt bounce for Barack... projected by the McCain camp as a way to lower the effect of any anticipated bounce.

I've had a sinking feeling over the past month.
But the way the ball has bounced this past week combined with the opening night of the convention leaves me very much encouraged, in light of the course of the previous month and memories of the '04 campaign. And I was ALL FOR Kerry. 1968 was my first year in politics. Again, I feel highly encouraged. Michelle was a smash.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

November 16-20

http://orbooks.com/files/going-rouge-small.jpg

Coming Soon



November 30-December 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address