« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Is John McCain Really A Hero?
BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE
Is John McCain Really A Hero?
One of the primary reason that this nation finds itself in the dire condition that we currently face, is that we’re extremely sloppy and less than precise in our political rhetoric. One example of that is how we fall all over ourselves in an attempt to honor John McCain as a military hero.
The fact is, while there is no doubt that Sen. McCain paid a heavy price during his service in the military, that doesn’t make him a hero, it simply makes him one among millions of military personnel over the years that have placed themselves in harms way in defense of this country. The only difference between McCain and any other person that’s ever raised his hand in defense of this country is that he was unlucky enough to be captured–and that in itself does not make you a hero-- it simply makes you a victim of war.
A hero is one who acts with nobility of purpose, and selflessly sacrifices his life, or places his life in imminent danger to promote the interests of the nation or his comrades. That doesn’t define McCain, and by that honor being hoisted upon him by his political supporters, it diminishes the sacrifice of the true hero, who with little forethought, threw his body on a live grenade to protect the lives of those he’d grown to love.
The essence of such a man, a true hero, involves character--selflessness, courage, a love of country and his fellow man. I’m sorry, but I don’t see those qualities in McCain. When I look at McCain I see a man immersed in his own self-interest--a man who lacked the character to stand by his first wife when she needed him most, even though she stood by him during his five years of imprisonment; a man who publically disrespected his current wife; a man who has been willing to exploit the sacrifices of true heroes for personal gain; and a man who’s willing to do or say whatever has to be done or said to promote his own interests. That’s not a hero, that’s an opportunist.
Take, for example, his lack of loyalty to fellow veterans. The Wall Street Journal reported that "Sen. John McCain used Memorial day to defend his opposition to a Senate bill that vastly expands education benefits for veterans. The bill passed the Senate last week 75-22 over the objections of Sen. McCain, and President Bush, both of whom argued the benefits were too generous and likely to discourage reenlistment."
In response to his opposition to the bill, McCain said, "At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we’re finally, finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb’s bill will reduce retention rates by 16 percent." The Washington Wire reports that he went on to say that "he was particularly concerned that educational benefits would reduce the number of noncommissioned officers, which he called the "backbone of the all the services."
Thus, McCain is essentially saying that it’s imprudent to enhance the educational benefits of our troops because if we provide our poor and middle class troops with the opportunity for better lives, we wouldn’t have anyone to fight our wars. So the obvious question is this–why not ask the upper class relatives of Bush, Cheney, and yourself to pitch in and give the nation a hand? You say this is a national emergency. Aren’t the children of upper class and privileged individuals a part of this nation as well? Due to the risk of creeping senility, I won’t wait for an answer.
Then there’s the issue of protecting our troops from the excesses of grievous war profiteering.
According to an article by HalliburtonWatch.org, a website dedicated to monitoring the performance of the Halliburton Corp., a corporation headed by Dick Cheney prior to becoming Vice President, and the largest recipient of no-bid government contracts in Iraq, during a hearing, held on June 27, 2005 by the Democratic Policy Committee, "Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) released a previously-secret military audit criticizing an extra $1.4 billion in ‘questioned’ and ‘unsupported’ expenditures by Halliburton's KBR subsidiary in Iraq. The audit was conducted by the Pentagon's Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). It determined that KBR had $1 billion in ‘questioned’ expenses in Iraq (i.e. expenses which military auditors consider "unreasonable") and $442 million in ‘unsupported’ expenses (i.e. expenses which military auditors have determined contain no receipt or any explanation on how the expenses were disbursed)."
Then in a September 20, 2005 article, the group reported that "Outrage overflowed on Capitol Hill this summer when members of Congress learned that Halliburton's dining halls in Iraq had repeatedly served spoiled food to unsuspecting troops. ‘This happened quite a bit,’ testified Rory Mayberry, a former food manager with Halliburton's KBR subsidiary."
In addition, Former KBR employees and water quality specialists, Ben Carter and Ken May, told HalliburtonWatch that "KBR knowingly exposes troops and civilians to contaminated water from Iraq's Euphrates River. One internal KBR email provided to HalliburtonWatch says that, for ‘possibly a year,’ the level of contamination at one camp was two times the normal level for untreated water."
One would think that a war hero and comrade in arms would go ballistic in response to such allegations, but Senate Republicans killed an amendment that would have established a special investigation into war profiteering by Halliburton and other companies by a vote of 53 to 44, while Sen. John McCain sat second in seniority, and silently, on the Armed Services committee.
So John McCain, a hero? I think not. Just as I don’t want to diminish Sen. McCain’s suffering on behalf of this country, neither do I want to diminish the sacrifices of this nation’s true heroes in the furtherance of a cheap political gimmick that will only serve to send more of their number to an early grave.
I realize I’m going to get a lot of flack for this–for actually saying out loud what many fellow vets are whispering in their hearts–but bring it on. It’s bad enough that we’ve allowed a bunch of draft dodgers to destroy our families and send loyal Americans to early, and undeserved graves, but now, to allow one of their accomplices to stand among these national heroes for profit while their families suffer, and they lie in eternal repose, that’s a little to much for this former Marine to take.
An old grunt once told me there was no such thing as a former Marine. I see now that he was right, because I feel a churning in my gut that says I’m honor bound to prepare for one last battle-- shaky joints and all.
Semper Fi!
Eric L. Wattree
wattree.blogspot.com








Comments (12)
For your information:
Former POW (trademarked) John (POW)McCain is a former prisoner of war.
August 23, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes! Yes! Never say he "was a POW". "EX-POW" is a negation of one of their positive talking points.
August 23, 2008 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Watt. A much needed perspective. Thank for your post. rec'd
August 23, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
From someone who also fought in NORTH Vietnam. Yes, he is.
Whether you agree with the rationale or not when you fight people in their own backyards, people defending their homes, their cities, you have to be a hero. It's also the most repulsive thing to do that I can imagine. I know - because I had to do it. It was my duty.
Every single soldier/sailor/airman who has fought in Iraq or Afghanistan is a hero in exactly the same way.
Every single one, IMO.
The fact that McBush is badly abusing that fact for selfish political gain is another subject entirely. That's OK, though. Like Biden said today, The Presidential campaign tests the candidates every single day.
McCain is not passing the test.
August 23, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, every single soldier is not a hero. In fact, most are not. Some of them are right fuckers, some even criminals. Mostly they are just regular folks in a bad place. We really have to be able to appreciate their experience without resorting to such unintellectual blanket terms as "heroism." We must understand it as a part of their overall life, a very traumatic part. In some cases it gives mental strength, in some it diminishes the same.
It is not heroism. It is just something they have experienced.
Besides, if everyone is a hero, does it not devalue the true heroes?
August 23, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Being a hero has nothing to do with other personality traits. You become a hero by putting your life for the greater good. That's it.
US Grant was a great example. A worthless drunkard but no one argues that he was not a great hero.
US Grant also became about as good a President as McCain would make. He who doesn't know history is doomed to repeat it.
August 24, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, I agree with you.
I've often wondered what is heroic about being a POW? Iam not diminishing McCain's pain and suffering or his service to the country -- which deserves recognition, but it does not qualify him to become president. If that were true, then every soldier and POW would be qualified to run the country. Using his POW status as a political firewall McCain trivializes and dishonours it.
Speaking of honour: Someone who is less than forthcoming on the campaign trail is not honourable. Attacking a man's character is not honourable. Telling lies about an opponent is not honourable. Misleading voters, making sexist and racist jokes, saying things that are patently false are not honourable traits. The idea a candidate is so willing to tell voters something that has no basis in reality or truth comes down to whether that person is "trustworthy."
McCain's claim of having "experience" is a false narrative. What "experience" does McCain have that qualifies him to be president? He has not made any great achievements. Being a senator for 26 years, a POW nor serving in the military prepares anyone for the presidency. No job does.
McCain's claim of having the right judgment is also a false narrative. His campaign is filled with over 100 lobbyists rather than consultants. For example: Randy Scheunemann his senior foreign policy advisor and a lobbyist for Georgia has received over $800,000 from Georgia's government. Whose best interests does he have in mind?
McCain has been less than forthcoming on a range of issues. He wants to privatize Social Security. He wants more wars. He wants to give huge corporations billions in tax breaks and a host of other things -- including kicking Russia out of the G-8. He wants to start a war with Iran. How smart is that?
The other day McCain said wrt Georgia, "we have reached a crisis, the first serious crisis since the end of the Cold War." Did he forget that since the fall of the Soviet Union the US has fought 2 wars in Iraq, a war in Afghanistan and 2 conflicts in the Balkans.
For someone who thinks Czechoslovakia still exists, references Pakistan-Iraq border, does not know the number of troops in Iraq, called Putin the President of Germany, and a lot of other things unravels McCain's narrative of having an upper hand on foreign policy.
Why does McCain want to become president? From John McCain's book in 2002:
"I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. . . . In truth, I'd had the ambition for a long time."
There is not much to suggest McCain has the country's best interests at heart.
August 23, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post. Highly recommended. Something that needs to be said and said repeatedly until the electorate knows the truth.
August 23, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I despise John McCain but I am willing to call him a hero. Any person who is captured by the enemy, tortured, and stays in captivity out of respect to his fellow soldiers after being offered a release, is clearly a hero. Hell, it is possible that I'd call him a hero for simply properly discharging his soldierly duties. Does any of this make him qualified to be president? Absolutely not, but it makes him worthy of some measure of respect when discussing his experience.
August 24, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
If having undergone adversity qualifies you as a hero, then everyone born and raised in the ghetto should at the very least be awarded a Silver Star.
August 24, 2008 6:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly, Wattree. This county has a weird tendency to down is upism that goes way beyond Republicans. I live in New York City and was amazed at the rhetoric calling the 9/11 casualties heroes.
I call them victims.
But America really does have a hard time with anything that smacks of loss or the possibility that we may, perhaps, not be invincible. Children everywhere have similar fantasies, but Americans just don't seem to grow out of them. And, because they remain children, you can tell them fairytales about things like going to War in Iraq being just and good and right they'll believe it all.
And you can frighten them. Lord can you frighten them.
So believing that there really are heroes who can leap strong buildings in a single bound and keep us all safe (not to mention having an all-powerful friend in the sky who'll protect you) is comforting too. That's what the ancient myths were for as well, to cheer up the pitiful creature called Man -- who couldn't run fast enough to keep ahead of hungry animals and was helpless in the face of floods and fires (and was cognizant enough to realize it) -- and make him less afraid.
But this mythology stuff gets really dangerous when you mix it with politics (witness Nazi Germany), and then the adults really do have to step in. With guns sometimes, and I suppose those guys are real heroes.
But the problem is, the lure of childhood has grown so strong over here (and let's give credit where credit is due: capitalism and its myth making engine, advertising) that adults are currently in short supply. Think about it: this is the land where old age (have you heard that sixty is the new forty?) doesn't happen and illness that can't be cured is swept under the rug. Or we read about "battles" with cancer. More heroes. See, they almost won. And maybe if cancer gets me, I really will win.
And death will have no dominion.
I'm fully prepared that one day road kill will called heroes too. Nietszche must be laughing his ass off somewhere.
August 24, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
If John McCain is a hero, what does that make Barack Obama the anti-hero? Neither one trumps the other as both traits are celebrated on point of view.
Joe Biden put it best in his stump speech for Obama this past Saturday he perfectly landed a punch to the face of McCain's military credentials, in paraphrasing he said to lead this nation it will take more than being just a 'good soldier' it will require someone that has the right judgement.
August 24, 2008 7:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment