MBH's Blog | Olbermann and Matthews Cut: A Special Comment »

Harriet Miers Part II


This morning, John McCain -- old man riverboat gambler -- has selected Sarah Palin of Alaska as his running mate.  Several problems with this pick:

(1) The experience argument is shown to be lip service.
(2) Barack Obama will be reframed as a tested veteran.
(3) McCain's judgment looks horrible -- is she ready to be president?
(4) McCain's temperament looks horrible -- he's doubled down on a king of diamonds and a 6 of hearts.
(5) Obama/Biden, as a ticket, now speaks more strongly to foreign policy.
(6) The V.P. debates will be embarrassing.
(7) She uses her power to exercise vendettas.
(8) The experience argument boomerangs.

33 Comments

| Leave a comment

Perfect phrasing.

McCain choosing Sarah Palin = Bush choosing Harriet Myers.

An unserious selection for a very serious position.

McCain riverboat gambler

(3) McCain's judgment looks horrible -- is she ready to be president?
(4) McCain's temperament looks horrible -- he's doubled down on a king of diamonds and a 6 of hearts.

This makes more sense if you remember that McCain likes to play the craps table in Vegas for hours on end. Obama is the poker player.

I think this decision is Quayle redux. McCain is attempting to appeal to young women and close the gender gap, much like Bush attempted to appeal to the youth vote by picking Quayle.

The problem is that Palin is a Stepford wife. She is a woman willing to sell out other women over a narrow set of beliefs. She is a Phyllis Schlaffly feminist, an Ann Coulter feminist, and in the coming days will have to defend a set of core values that undermine gender equality.

McCain has picked a trophy VP with minimal reformist credentials in a blatant attempt to pander to women. Much like McCain is anti-soldier, Palin is anti-woman.

This is a flash in the pan. McCain will hog a little spotlight, but it is purely rubbernecking. The choice draws the wrong kind of attention and will bring out media apologists who will commit all sorts of verbal acrobatics trying to justify this decision.

Her opening speech was flat. She clapped into the microphone and spoke from her sinuses like an amateur. The amount of training it is going to take to mold her into a credible national candidate exceeds the benefits of the choice itself.

McCain also made the choice during soap opera time in an attempt to entertaint he housemarm vote. Too bad Oprah has already thrown her weight behind Obama.

I mean, for God's sakes, what does Palin bring to the table that isn't already offered in spades by the Democratic ticket?

McCain/Stepford 08

McCain has picked a trophy VP with minimal reformist credentials in a blatant attempt to pander to women.

Exactly. A Trophy VP. I feel a little sorry for her at this point. If McCain loses the election, pundits will likely blame his failure on Palin's presence, but it was his decision to bring her aboard.

I'll feel more sorry for her if she is cleared of the pending vendetta-firing charges (a scandal brewing in her state of AK), but things don't look good.

She could have had the good sense to say "No." Something like, oh, "I'm honored, but I don't feel I'm quite ready yet." A hard offer to turn down, but people have turned the No. 2 spot down before, for similar reasons.

And McCain's VP maneuver is not just pandering to women...it's pandering to anyone seeking legitimate change in presidential politics.

This isn't change. It's novelty.

Barack Obama has shown us, in countless debates, public appearances, journeys abroad, through his education, and through his legislative experience, that he has the chops for the top job. Sarah Palin has not been similarly tested, and she truly will stand a heartbeat away from McCain's (possible) presidency. He is now 72 years old, battered from war injuries, afflicted with skin cancer, and possibly predispositioned to die in his 70's (his father died at age 70...without suffering years in a prison camp).

A bizarre, nonchalant, patronizing choice.

If I was a woman voter, in this case I would feel like a child trying to get his workaholic or otherwise uninterested father to go to the Father-Daughter picnic with me...and instead of setting time aside for an afternoon of meaningful companionship, Father McCain just hands me a $5.00 bill and gently urges me to let him get back to his business.

I find this whole thing very bizarre. I can't use that word enough. It just fits.

To think I used to like the guy. Deep down, I think McCain is still the same politician he used to be...he's just become a tool of Neoconservative string-pullers. Maybe so. And that's more than a little scary. If only we could pull back the American Hard-Right curtain for all to see, and expose who or what is behind it.

Republicans used to be awesome. Abraham Lincoln. Teddy Roosevelt. Dwight D. Eisenhower. Chuck Hagel, Arlen Specter, and Richard Lugar have been exceptional Republicans in the modern era, but they're like puddles of water surrounded by desert. I would once have included John McCain with them...but he has been seized by whatever force has purged the good Republicans and replaced them with Bizarro clones (Rick Santorum, Bill Frist, the sitting President, etc.)

Sinister man/organization/thing behind the curtain...let our people go!

I think this decision is Quayle redux. McCain is attempting to appeal to young women and close the gender gap, much like Bush attempted to appeal to the youth vote by picking Quayle.

The problem is that Palin is a Stepford wife. She is a woman willing to sell out other women over a narrow set of beliefs. She is a Phyllis Schlaffly feminist, an Ann Coulter feminist, and in the coming days will have to defend a set of core values that undermine gender equality.

McCain has picked a trophy VP with minimal reformist credentials in a blatant attempt to pander to women. Much like McCain is anti-soldier, Palin is anti-woman.

This is a flash in the pan. McCain will hog a little spotlight, but it is purely rubbernecking. The choice draws the wrong kind of attention and will bring out media apologists who will commit all sorts of verbal acrobatics trying to justify this decision.

Her opening speech was flat. She clapped into the microphone and spoke from her sinuses like an amateur. The amount of training it is going to take to mold her into a credible national candidate exceeds the benefits of the choice itself.

McCain also made the choice during soap opera time in an attempt to entertaint he housemarm vote. Too bad Oprah has already thrown her weight behind Obama.

I mean, for God's sakes, what does Palin bring to the table that isn't already offered in spades by the Democratic ticket?

McCain/Stepford 08

This may get worse more quickly than people realize. The ethics probe looks like it is for real. She hasn't handled the situation well. There is a video from Channel 11 in Alaska showing her changing her story about the guy who was fired, etc.

In my blog below there is a link to more info on the ethics stuff from a blogger in Alaska.

McCain Just Lost the Election with a Hail Mary
http://msa4.wordpress.com/

Completely, absolutely true.

But I'd strengthen the "is she ready to be President?" argument. Rephrase it as, "would you feel safe with Sarah Palin as your commander in chief?

What was the flop TV show with Genna Davis as the President?

Old man President dies and young untested college president is now commander in chief?

I am going to take a contrarian view. I think Palin effectively counters, to a degree, one of Sen Biden's strengths: his ability as a debater nonpareil.

I dug around and found this:

http://palinforvp.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-beat-joe-biden.html

This may reflect the GOP's thinking. I don't want to underestimate her. Thats the way to get beat.

As far as I can research she is a big oil&gas, fossil fuel industry supporter, but also has a bit of the reformer in her. A very interesting combo.

The idea isn't to underestimate. The idea is to see the choice CLEARLY, unimpeded by either hope or fear. The fact is that McCain wants to close the gender gap. His daughter has a retarded weblog geared to American Idol youth, and Palin is another attempt to shore up this problem.

McCain needs to entice the wave of fresh voter registration that he his a hip independent reformer, a POW who puts his country first regardless of party. The problem is that Palin is the only credible choice that is untainted by the Bush administration. Palin has mild credentials as a reformer, and she will also make the case that the entire United States needs to open its land up to Big Oil... the idea being that the best way to defeat terrorism is to strip our ecology bare.

On the surface. she is a pick that reinforces some of the perceptions of McCain. However, her downfall is that she is an anti-feminist social conservative. Women are simply not going to respond to one of their own who tells them that they are bare-footed breeding chattle. Simply not going to happen.

The McCain campaign has, in its blindness, chosen a Stepford wife to break the glass ceiling. This antagonizes the Hillary voters, and reinorces the notion that a woman must sell out her gender and her civil rights in order to get ahead in white male America.

McCain/Stepford 08

Biden's job isn't to attack McCain's VP, it's to attack McCain.

She doesn't make a difference to Biden's real job.

I think Obama's team should continue to go after McCain. His picking Palin show's McCain's poor judgment, not hers. In a way, I'd mostly leave her alone as a "not ready for prime time player".

Your link makes two points:

1. Palin can sit back and not even listen to other debaters and finally toss off a one liner, something like, "What I want to know is what are we going to do for Alaskans?!", and get some attention for herself. She didn't invent this technique; look up the etymology of "claptrap."

2. Beating up on a woman can be a bad debate strategy. Hmmm. Guess Biden knew that already.

I think the link is vacuous, and you got yourself pretty damn worked up about not much at all.

My question is, what's he draw to independents? Nobody is going to vote for McCain because of Palin who wasn't already predisposed to voting for McCain. She 'does no evil' for the next few weeks ONLY. She's absolutely going to have a potatoe-moment (or five) before November. She's already gone there by not being exactly sure what a VP does!

Plus potentially offending the very voters she intends to court...

Once onstage, together with Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, Palin talked about what women expect from women leaders; how she took charge in Alaska during a political scandal that threatened to unseat the state's entire Republican power structure, and her feelings about Sen. Hillary Clinton. (She said she felt kind of bad she couldn't support a woman, but she didn't like Clinton's "whining.")

The word "whine" rears its head again! Love it!

McCain/Stepford 08

user-pic

The way for Biden to win the debate against Palin on VP Debate Night is to make the debate about McCain. Biden should be relentlessly on message that night. Don't make it about Palin, don't make it look like you're attacking her; make it all about McCain.

Make her defend McCain's policies and the conservative philosophy... continue from Obama's speech and make the contest about ideas and the ability to articulate them. Palin is much too lightweight to do anything but dogwhistle.

(9) McCain/Palin = still no experience with the economy.
(10) Palin's beauty contest experience fills the celebrity status most appropriately.

(11) McCain's trigger happiness will not be balanced by a strong enough number 2.

The only way I could reason this was a good pick was that McCain believed the polls that said 30% of Clinton voters would not vote for Obama. If that is the case; and if we get a few PUMA stragglers then it could turn out to be a good choice.

Course it could result in lots of men and women Republicans sitting out the election because they feel they have no choice.

What ever happens, it is going to be interesting.

People who didn't make a firm choice in 2000 gave us Bush.

People have a choice. If they don't exercise it, their should strongly blame themselves and graciously accept the righteous blame of others.

Pailin' or not, I think this whole "untested" label for Obama was true only before he went through his testing. Remember at the start of the Democratic selection process, how everybody was saying that it was one of the THE MOST substantial field of candidates in memory? Barack Obama and his incredible crew beat them all. He won 34 out of 57 contests. He beat the Clintons!

McCane never went through 57 hard-fought contests. And remember, in contrast to the Democratic field, McCane was facing what everybody was saying was a pretty pathetic bunch of second-stringers on the Republican side.

Barack Obama has demonstrated as thoroughly as any candidate anywhere that he is tested, ready, and fully able.

Pailin' or not, I think this whole "untested" label for Obama was true only before he went through his testing. Remember at the start of the Democratic selection process, how everybody was saying that it was one of the THE MOST substantial field of candidates in memory? Barack Obama and his incredible crew beat them all. He won 34 out of 57 contests. He beat the Clintons!

McCane never went through 57 hard-fought contests. And remember, in contrast to the Democratic field, McCane was facing what everybody was saying was a pretty pathetic bunch of second-stringers on the Republican side.

Barack Obama has demonstrated as thoroughly as any candidate anywhere that he is tested, ready, and fully able.

Hmmmm. Someone was doctoring, er, I mean editing Palin's Wikipedia page recently, and scrubbing off the bad stuff.

NPR has it:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94118849

"All Things Considered, August 29, 2008 · If you happened to check Sarah Palin's Wikipedia entry thursday, you might have had a good tip about today's announcement. Someone — and apparently it was just one person — felt like the existing biography wasn't appropriate for a vice-presidential candidate."


Strangely, the person had very detailed knowledge about her personal life. Could Sarah Quaylin have edited her own wikipedia page?

Oh my... how interesting...

Not all edits were positive revisions. Just after she took the stage, someone edited her wikipedia page to say "Sarah Palin likes cock." (It was fixed about 5 minutes afterwards.)

I think her infant son Trig was framed.

Oh my.....

McCain has picked a trophy VP with minimal reformist credentials in a blatant attempt to pander to women.

Exactly. A Trophy VP. I feel a little sorry for her at this point. If McCain loses the election, pundits will likely blame his failure on Palin's presence, but it was his decision to bring her aboard.

I'll feel more sorry for her if she is cleared of the pending vendetta-firing charges (a scandal brewing in her state of AK), but things don't look good.

She could have had the good sense to say "No." Something like, oh, "I'm honored, but I don't feel I'm quite ready yet." A hard offer to turn down, but people have turned the No. 2 spot down before, for similar reasons.

And McCain's VP maneuver is not just pandering to women...it's pandering to anyone seeking legitimate change in presidential politics.

This isn't change. It's novelty.

Barack Obama has shown us, in countless debates, public appearances, journeys abroad, through his education, and through his legislative experience, that he has the chops for the top job. Sarah Palin has not been similarly tested, and she truly will stand a heartbeat away from McCain's (possible) presidency. He is now 72 years old, battered from war injuries, afflicted with skin cancer, and possibly predispositioned to die in his 70's (his father died at age 70...without suffering years in a prison camp).

A bizarre, nonchalant, patronizing choice.

If I was a woman voter, in this case I would feel like a child trying to get his workaholic or otherwise uninterested father to go to the Father-Daughter picnic with me...and instead of setting time aside for an afternoon of meaningful companionship, Father McCain just hands me a $5.00 bill and gently urges me to let him get back to his business.

I find this whole thing very bizarre. I can't use that word enough. It just fits.

To think I used to like the guy. Deep down, I think McCain is still the same politician he used to be...he's just become a tool of Neoconservative string-pullers. Maybe so. And that's more than a little scary. If only we could pull back the American Hard-Right curtain for all to see, and expose who or what is behind it.

Republicans used to be awesome. Abraham Lincoln. Teddy Roosevelt. Dwight D. Eisenhower. Chuck Hagel, Arlen Specter, and Richard Lugar have been exceptional Republicans in the modern era, but they're like puddles of water surrounded by desert. I would once have included John McCain with them...but he has been seized by whatever force has purged the good Republicans and replaced them with Bizarro clones (Rick Santorum, Bill Frist, the sitting President, etc.)

Sinister man/organization/thing behind the curtain...let our people go!

littlenomad, I like your questioning 'who' or 'what' is behind the curtain. I'm reading John Dean's Conservatives Without Conscience right now. After a hundred or so pages, I can try to tell you what he saw behind the curtain.

He describes a mindset: authoritarianism. Specifically, at its root, he describes "motivated cognition." Motivated cognition refers to a systematic way of thinking, believing, feeling, and wanting that is pushed to its conclusions by either (a) outside interests or (b) flawed internal, undeveloped, forces. Unlike concluding that 'Rain is falling' because 'I feel the rain dropping on my skin', motivated cognition registers 'Rain is falling' because 'I know it is' or because 'Mr. A. told me it is'.

So really, I think Dean is hinting (and I could be off, I still have a 100 pages to go) that what lies behind the curtain is really an aspect of human interaction that has not evolved. Granted, he uses the example of conservatives without conscience -- those who submit to authority and seek to dominate -- as the center of the book (the half I've read). I think the lesson he's getting to is that these people are entirely worthless once we understand their game. This way, the curtain image is reminiscent of The Wizard of Oz.

The Daily Show had a killer routine tonight about Palin. I imagine it will become available for download tomorrow. If you get a chance, find the Samantha Bee skit that completely nails how condescending and ridiculous this choice is.

Harriet Myers II is exactly it!

We are forgetting that any independents who may have been leaning towards McCain because they don't really feel sold on Obama are suddenly seeing him as the sane choice. Also, you cannot tell me conservative males see a "tough, ready to lead CiC" in her. They just do not. So, while McCane may get some disaffected women, I think whatever gains those are will be matched by losing those two constituencies.

Caveat, McCain will pobabably not lose hard core conservatives at all, but blue collar "Reagan Dems" and conservative *leaning* males...

Leave a comment

MBH

user-pic

Following: 48
Followers: 26

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Books Thought as a System, Wholeness and the Implicate Order--David Bohm; The Tractatus--Ludwig Wittgenstein; The World as Will and Representation--Arthur Schopenhauer; The Theory of Communicative Action I and II--Jurgen Habermas; Reason and Value: Aristotle versus Rand--Roderick Long
  • Favorite Quotes "Make kindness more virulent than violence." --amike

Bio

ENTP

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address