« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Fournier: MoveOn Hits Back
A truly appalling hit piece on the Biden nod.
Josh put it best
Courtin'Ron Fournier riding hard on the tire swing.
--Josh Marshall
MoveOn's organizing the blowback
http://pol.moveon.org/emails/ap_fournier.html
Can you email AP reporter Ron Fournier
and CC his boss, Managing Editor Mike
Oreskes? Tell them that the public's faith in the 160-year-old AP will
be gone if Ron Fournier is allowed to continue his slanted articles
against Democrats and for McCain.
Here are their emails:
Michael Oreskes, AP Managing Editor, mOreskes@ap.org
Ron Fournier, AP reporter and Washington D.C. Bureau Chief, rfournier@ap.org








Comments (27)
Fournier is a joke of a "reporter". What a clown he is.
August 23, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd. Done. Fournier is a steaming pile of ...
August 23, 2008 8:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's pretty insulting, Ripper. Really unnecessary.
What did a steaming pile of shit ever do to you to deserve being equated to Ron Fournier?
August 24, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah! about time someone stood up for steamin' piles. LOL
August 24, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd. Done. Here's my text in case it saves someone a little time.
Dear Michael Oreskes,
I'm writing about AP Reporter Ron Fournier and his "analysis" piece on Democratic VP selection, dated Saturday, August 23, 2008.
This is the first time I have ever written a letter to complain about bias in news coverage. But the article "Biden Pick Shows Lack of Confidence" was so explicitly slanted -- consistently choosing to frame Democrats with negative language ("lack of confidence," "weakness," "inexperience," "status quo") -- that it has caused me to question my long-standing assumptions about the Associated Press. This article, labeled as an "analysis" piece, would much more appropriately have been described as an editorial.
Since this is not the first article by the Washington Bureau Chief that seemed to be biased in favor of John McCain, I am coming to see the AP as a partisan news organization. Even more specifically, the AP appears to be staking out a position that explicitly promotes a single candidate, rather as Fox News implicitly backed Rudy Giuliani in the Republican primary last fall.
Please take action to restore my confidence in the Associated Press by resolving Ron Fournier's conflict of interest. His close connections to the McCain camp make it inappropriate for him to be covering the 2008 Presidential Campaign.
August 23, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your generous sharing of your text, Alex. It's really really good.
August 24, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, this is excellent. You're an excellent poster here.
August 24, 2008 5:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is good Alex, thanks.
August 24, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is my email. I find I am having anger issues when dealing with anything even slightly Rethuglican. Might need counseling.
Dear Sir (and I use that term lightly),
Your disgusting partisanship has no place in what many
in America would expect to be an nonpartisan
organization. How blind do you think we are? Or are
you so blinded by your love of J. McCain that you fail
to see your own bias?
If you can't perform this job with the respect it
deserves, please have the decency to step down.
August 24, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay. It's important to write. But at this point I am ready to go after these guys with phasers, set on stun of course, just to shock them into having some decency.
Perhaps if they realized that the Federation will arrive soon and be able to reveal all of their tainted moves with incredible technology, they might be more careful.
"Obama, Spock, and the New Star Trek Nation"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/
August 23, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
For what it's worth, there are people on DKos talking about targeted research into Fournier's connections, and other aspects of his life.
That approach is a little rough for me, personally -- but I'm not complainin', either. This was really a travesty, and somebody at AP needs to sit up and take notice before they flush their brand down the toilet.
August 23, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, that approach is a bit too Atwater/Rove for me as well. But it couldn't happen to a better guy.
August 24, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not for me. Not any more. They pull a knife, we pull a tactical nuke.
That is all.
August 24, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also worth a look, especially the updates.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/23/aps-ron-fournier-strikes-again-writes-hit-piece-on-obamas-vp-pick/
August 23, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Done, thanks for bringing our attention to this, John.
August 23, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you TPM and MoveOn for providing the links to Michael Oreskes at the AP!
I have been upset at the AP's slant and bias for several years now. It has become insidious! You don't even have to "read" their spin in print; all you have to do is to listen to some radio announcer unknowingly read a line or two from the AP's wire services during the radio show's three or four minute news segment. The wire service is filled with Republican spin! The sad thing is that these announcers have no idea what they are reading or how they are being used.
Anyway, thanks to your links, I sat down tonight (like others here) and FINALLY wrote the following email--which I have been meaning to write for a long time now:
Dear Micahel Oreskes:
I am writing to urge you to remove Ron Fournier from your staff as an AP Reporter and Washington DC Bureau Chief. Under Mr. Fournier, the Associated Press appears no longer to be interested in producing Journalism, but instead is quickly becoming nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Republican Party. Mr. Fournier, in specific, makes no attempt to report the news in an unbiased and objective manner, but rather focuses on creating hit pieces on Democrats that the AP in turn masks as "Reporting" and "News Analysis."
I majored in Journalism in the early 1970s. Never could I have imagined back then that the Associated Press would devolve and degenerate into becoming a source of such disgraceful and biased writing--coupled with endless down-right lies. Sadly, Mr. Fournier is destroying the credibility and reputation of all other members of your staff.
The Associated Press is turning into the Fox News of the written word--in other words a tragic joke. Like Fox, you offer lies, spin and propaganda to your readers that you masquerade as Journalism. I would suggest that one way to begin reversing this trend is by removing Ron Fournier from your staff.
Thank you.
August 24, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
this was something noted at DKos, from FDL originally, that isn't linked here yet but still significant if you haven't written yet. For what its worth I suggested a more permanent web site where Fournier's writings and dealings with McCain and the effort to have him removed would be the focus. That was before I knew of Move On taking on this project. Since that has occurred I think AP will get the msg though I wonder about its chairman of the Board of Directors, William Dean Singleton. Read on...
"More backstory here (6+ / 0-)
http://firedoglake.com/...
Synopsis: William Dean Singleton, Chairman of the AP Board and a man who would like to own more media than he already does, was the one who referred to Obama as "Osama", at the same event where Fournier and Sidoti were feeding McCain with sprinkle-covered grapes doughnuts. In the Senate, McCain helped Singleton with his media consolidation goals, and Obama got in their way.
So, the problem seems to go right to the top.
All the same, no reason not to let middle-management feel it.
That's Mr. Cindy McCain, my friends.
by itswhatson on Sat Aug 23, 2008 at 06:12:22 PM PDT"
August 24, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd
What is with the AP? Really gone down hill.
First that Rovian plant, Nedra Pickler, and now this McCain shill Fourner.
August 24, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you, wholeheartedly, Observer 2. So much of our MSM has turned into what the Soviet Union could only have dreamed of with their Pravda and Tass "propaganda" machines.
Of course, there are notable exceptions to our otherwise complicit MSM--such as Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and Bill Moyers. But Rove and Company set the stage here years ago. And Rove is like Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda: The MSM automatically does now exactly what Rove wants. These Corporate Puppets no longer need to receive their "marching orders" since they intuitively have become Republican mouthpieces!
August 24, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's mine:
Mr. Fournier-
Imagine my disappointment at seeing Barack Obama's historical selection of Joe Biden as his running mate described in the above terms. Had Obama picked a running mate who is not a distinguished legislator, I am quite certain the headline would have read: "Analysis: pick shows lack of judgment." These sorts of value statements are not "analysis", they are advocacy. As such, they have no place on the AP newswire.
The Associated Press, as a venerable and well-nigh indispensable part of our civic landscape has an obligation to tell the story straight. Even in these media-saturated times, the AP's reporting is still a primary source of news and information for many Americans. When the AP dissembles, people are misled. When people are misled, our national conversation suffers. In these circumstances, neither John McCain nor Barack Obama is capable of presenting his case to the nation free from misinformation and prejudice. Though the particular story to which I refer clearly favors the tallking points of the McCain campaign, your choice to report this story tendentiously harms Republicans and Democrats alike. You may think that you aid John McCain when you write this way. But the nation to whose highest office he aspires will be both weaker and sadder for your covert advocacy.
I urge you to dig deep and find some professional integrity. Barring that, I urge you to find a job to which you are better suited.
August 24, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This may be un-important but would it be a good analysis to look into the effectiveness of certain feedback the AP has had in the past and its reactions to it? What I mean to express is, "has the AP ever gotten feedback from the audience (american reading public) about its articles or editors, such as Mr. Fournier , before? What was its reaction to this feedback? What type of subject matter was the AP willing to be constructive on?
I have not done any research into the subject matter but I think it would be an interesting caveat to find out if the AP has been willing to change the editors or apologize for certain types of stories or audiences which have been more effective at getting things changed at the AP. Maybe media matters has some info on this sort of thing?
As for the letter to senor Fournier, consider it sent and I sincerely hope they can see this article for what it truly is, "subjective"!
August 24, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just sent a quick comment. I suggested they reassign him to Iraq or Afghanistan.
August 24, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we get some sort of list started with these emails, such as who to contact at AP, TIME, ABC. CBS etc. When MoveOn did the petition on Gibson & Stephanopoulus after that debate in Philadelphia, they had a huge response in a very short time. Didn't it actually bring down the servers at ABC? I don't pay any attention to the shallow, trivial, biased & egotistical MSM, and am happy to contribute my opinion to any campaign to attack them.
August 24, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lisat: Your idea of contacting other news outlets is excellent!! I also agree with your suggestion that we need to start a mass, concerted effort on the order of the MoveOn Petition that was drawn up after the Charlie/George Pennsylvania "debate"--or more accurately, "debacle!" Thanks!
August 24, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's my email to mOreskes@ap.org
Mr. Oreskes,
When you were in journalism school you must have had some great mentors who inspired you to put in the time and effort that has resulted in your current position as managing editor of a major news organization. You must have had a deep-seated respect for the art and science of journalism and the pivotal role it plays in our democracy. You must have developed a strong sense of wright and wrong and the basic tenets of journalistic responsibility and integrity.
Imagine what your best professors and mentors would say if they could see what’s become of the revered Associated Press under your watch. They surely showed you the line between news and opinion and explained in no uncertain terms why you mustn’t step over it.
Ron Fournier is doing for the AP what George Bush has done for lobbyists and the Republican party – he’s killing the brand. It’s taken decades for the AP to earn the trust and respect of Americans such as myself, and it’s only taking a single presidential cycle to destroy it, and your personal integrity in the bargain.
August 24, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a link to a MoveOn page that helps you write a letter to the editor of a major news outlet to complain. They provide the form and talking points and will forward the letter on.
http://pol.moveon.org/lte/lte_t.html?zip=98119<e_campaign_id=94
August 24, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suggest we call him
" Mr. Fourniercation"
From this day forward.
August 24, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment