Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

FDR on Obama's timing

In 1935, some of Roosevelt’s advisers were fretting over the rising power of Louisiana Senator Huey Long and California doctor Charles Townsend; they wanted him to come out swinging against his potential challengers.  They particularly hoped he would take the political implications of Townsend seriously, even though many laughed at the his plan for old age insurance. 

As usual, though, Roosevelt was unalarmed.  He sensed that the protest movements were off in their timing, at least as far as elections were concerned.  He viewed Townsend, Coughlin and Long as a “free side-show” that would run its course, having flared up in 1935. 

“Public psychology, he said, ‘cannot, because of human weakness, be attuned for long periods of time to a constant repetition of the highest note in the scale… There is another thought which is involved in continuous leadership,’ the President went on. 

People ‘tire of seeing the same name day after day in the important headlines of the papers, and the same voice night after night over the radio.  For example, if since last November I had tried to keep up the pace of 1933 and 1934, the inevitable histrionics of the new actors, Long and Coughlin and Johnson, would have turned the eyes of the audience away from the main drama itself!’  But Roosevelt agreed that the time would come for a ‘new stimulation of united American action,’ and he would be ready."

About that "Obama fatigue"... it's about time the man went on a vacation, right?

As MJ Rosenberg said the other day, McCain is faring well in the polls precisely because he couldn't get any media attention.  If he had, people would have noticed his colossal flubs and doubted his competence.  Let's let Mac have some acreage on the magazine covers, and give people a breather from nonstop Obama.  That seems to be Barack's strategy, and FDR would approve.

(Source: James M. Burns, Roosevelt: The Lion and the Fox, 214)


Comments (12)

Maybe this was the GOPs dastardly plan all along - I mean all they do in their ads is talk about Obama, all their surrogates do is talk about Obama. They're hoping for Obama fatigue it seems...

Perhaps they're just taking the upside of the media's fascination with Obama to use it against him... but, more than anything, I think they want this election to be "about Obama" just like '04 was "about Kerry," because they know they don't have much to say for their own guy.

avatar

I think the point is that media's (mostly critical) obsession with Obama could have a numbing effect on any future attacks, thus working to protect Obama.

Obama fatigue doesn't necessarily mean people are tired of Obama. I think it more likely means they have heard sufficent GOP/McCain/MSM criticism of Obama and now want hear more about McCain. Contrary to media assumptions, most people I know can't tell you much about McCain aside from his having been a POW.

avatar

Yes, time to turn to McCain, and he has helped us begin to do so by running an ad of Democrats talking about him. (To which the Obama camp responded promptly and effectively.)

We can be of assistance on the Web by revealing McCain in a light that the Obama cannot.

For fun:

"Who Does McCain Remind you of? A New Game for Hard Times"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/

avatar

I read somewhere that McCain couldn't get any media attention unless he talked about Obama, so that's one reason he started doing it non-stop.

any port in the storm, right?

More like "Any orifice in a storm."

avatar

I'm entertaining the thought that the whole "celebrity" issue of the negative ads was, in part, intended to be a future innoculation aginst people being drawn to Obama. The Repugnicans had already witnessed how charismatic Obama is, how able he is to draw throngs and win hearts, and they wanted to put out the idea that, careful, if you like this guy, he's not what he seems, he's an empty suit... you know, kind of like your best friend warning you about that hunk you're pining after, telling you he'll break your heart.

I've talked to quite a few folks back in NC who express unease or discomfort with Obama's charisma... they seem to regard any politician who speaks beautifully as fundamentally suspicious, like he must be up to something if he sounds too good to be true. McCain may be wanting to play up those kinds of mixed feelings about Obama's undeniable "rock star" qualities... It's funny, after several years of our deadly dull candidates like Gore and Kerry being made fun of, the passion of guys like Dean and Obama becomes a liability.

To me, the most important subtext of the celebrity stuff just goes back to experience and qualifications. Obama is famous for being famous, just like Hilton, while affirmative action has allowed him to create an "illusion of achievement" just like wealth has for Paris.

I know what you mean, and I really don't get it. I mean it isn't like Obama is speaking pretty nothings in our ears; he is making sense. He had it right when he said -- It's like they WANT to be ignorant -- or something like that.

But conversely, does it have to mean that the only good person for President has to have a lead mouth? Is it a good thing for the President to not remember that Czecholsovakia isn't a country any more, or the difference between Shiites and Sunis? How can anyone think that someone with an adolescent sense of humor would be a good representative of our country?

I just don't get it, unless it really is that McCain's followers like him because they just don't want someone to be President who is smarter than they are. Sadly, that is the only thing I can conclude, since last time they voted for someone (who claims he doesn't drink because of alcoholism) based on who they would most want to have a beer with.

Go figure!

Absolutely... the fact that the recovering alcoholic passed the "who you want to have a beer with test" is truly baffling...

It has been said that FDR had a sixth sense finely attuned to public opinion. He was probably right but since Huey Long was assassinated in September 1935, we will never really know. Even with Long dead, FDR ran his most populist campaign in 1936 probably because he still had to compete with Long's Share the Wealth third party challenger.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address