Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Dear Sweet Mother of God, Will You People Just STFU Already?

I said it last night, but tonight it is worse. 

I've watched a lot of conventions.  I've always found them entertaining.  This year, however . . . this year, the asshats just will not shut the fuck up.  Its like they think the party rented the hall and put on the speaks just so they would have an exciting new place to bloviate and pontiicate and genrally spout oceans of uninformed blather as if it were news.  Olbermann gets stupider the closer his proximity to Tweety.  Tweety and all the rest of them get stupider the closer we get to the election.  Russert's son is proving himself to be just as big a tool as his dad could be.  Even Chuck Todd has run out of intelligent things to say, and yet must keep talking and talking and talking and talking.  Hey, they say.  No one wants to hear those speeches, they want to hear us talk and talk and talk because god knows there's not enough oportunity to listen to us the rest of the year. 

And CNN, God don't get me started on those idiots.  Who gives a pile of  steamiing monkey feces what a bunch of washed up has=been Democratic "consultants" and super-extra evil Republican pigs have to say about anything?  Who cares about the empty drivel pouring out of Wolf Blitzer's mouth.  And Bill Schnieder?  The notion that that imbecile knows anything about politics would be laughable if not for the fact that he's there, on my TV running his mouth with that oh-so-knowing and wise gleam in his eye as he just says stuff with no apparent connection to any fact-based universe.   

And oh the problems for Obama.  Problem, problems everywhere.  Problems to the left of him, problems to the right.  Problems with money, problems with Hillary, problems with everyone and everything.  Problems connecting with the all important white 70+ women with "Ring Bell for Service" tatooed on their ass demographic.  My oh my oh my.  The problems, problems, problems. 

One thing I can assure you is that the discussion of the many, many problems facing John McCain will get only cursory bleating at best during the Republican convention. That would be a terrible way to pay John back for the barbecue and the facials

Just shut the fuck up already.  You're embarassing yourselves and the country.  Shut up. 

I honestly don't know if I'm going to be able to watch this shit at all if all they're going to do is sit in their booths in the nosebleed sections and yap and yap and bleat and baaaah.

Thank you.  The "Rant About the Asshats" light has been turned on.  You are free to rant about the cabin. 


Comments (105)

avatar

Turn to CSPAN. Yes, it's a damn shame that most people will get their information from these asshats, but pray God that they get enough to save us all.

avatar

or PBS.

CNN is too painful to sit thru anymore.

avatar

I can't tell the difference between CNN and Fox anymore.

PBS was better but it still sucked last night. They, too, would not stfu

Yes, CSPAN was a God send for us starting last night. Like Steve, I can't handle the uninformed drivel any more and rarely watch the corporate "news" shows, but we still wanted to watch the convention.

Caught a little Gwen Iffel on PBS. That, too, was good. Why they don't tap Bill Moyers is beyond me. Is is by far the best informed broadcast journalist and has the most common sense.

Thanks for the excellent rant, Steve!

I got that tip about CSPAN here yesterday and I am so grateful. I got to hear a rousing speech by Denise Kucinich; I switched over to MSNBC just out of curiosity and Pat B was squeaking his message about McCain's POW stuff is brilliant BECAUSE IT WORKS!

Even the dope Gregory admitted that McCain has spent little in his negative ads compared to how much mileage he has gotten while they show the ads again and again as if the ads were "news."

Stick with CSPAN -- it is better for your health!

Moyers is sort of persona non grata at PBS these days. If I remember rightly, he had some clashes with Senior Mgmt.

Agreed with CSPAN. I don't know why anyone would watch the chuckleheads on cable. They're good for about 15 minutes, but honestly, they're all useless twits who should be shipped to another galaxy.

avatar

I think this one area where nearly all of us can agree. The proliferation of these Cable-TV loons has reached a point nearly beyond parody, and I speak to no particular ideological point-of-view when I say that. Never has so much noisy energy been so uselessly and so monontonously invested, to so little constructive effect. Mice chasing each other thru a maze are acting more sensibly by comparison. I have said in here half-seriously that democracy has more to fear from the likes of Chris Matthews than it does from Antonin Scalia.

REAL politics and REAL government are not TV shows. The so-called "issues" that these people waste our time in discussing and even considering are almost NEVER the things that should really sensibly MATTER to an ordinary voter on ANY side. Meanwhile, they stand there shouting and otherwise completely obstructing REAL politicians talking about REAL government, to the extent that we can't even hear what the REAL people are actually saying.

Do what I have done: (1) Get off of CNN, Fox, and MSNBC as far as political matters are concerned - they are a complete waste of time. (2) Read your daily newspaper thoroughly. (3) Catch the network evening news - not the same one every night, move around a little. PBS News is also good. (4) Use that extra time to do constructive things: work in the yard or the garden, fix better meals, practice your golf swing, pay your bills, read, talk face-to-face to an actual person, and (here's a really good one)THINK.

You'll make a better citizen and voter for doing do, and you won't waste another valuable minute of your time on this earth trying (to no avail) to sort-out this manufactured, deliberate circus foolishness. We got Washington, Lincoln, and Roosevelt without that kind of "help". We'll do OK without it now, if we have to.

Formerly,

Relax dude. What the "washed up" "asshats" and talking haridos in general don't get is that it's 2008, not 2004; and Obama et all are pursuing a modified Dean/Trippi strategy and not the DLC strategy which led to the Gore, Kerry defeats and to Sen. Clinton's defeat in the primary.

The 2008 election map is very different than the 2004 map, as has the electorate. The washed up ass hats, and John Roberts and his fancy electronic map, just don't get it.

Relax dude.

But Chris - Remember - Hillary won all those votes and Barack didn't which must mean he can't win them against a Republican.

My God he lost to Hillary in PA by 9.6% and he is only up 7 there over McCain. The sky is falling!

My God Kerry won there by a whopping 3 points and Gore by 4 and he is screwing the pooch!!!! Under performing.

He is losing NC,ND,SD,AK - all Red states by 1-3% right now when Kerry and Gore lost all of them by double digits....

CO, NM and NV are all tight and Kerry lost them as well...

The Asshats need to pay attention the real 50 state race and the ground game behind it...

Hillary's speech and a Romney or Lieberman pick will take us here in GA from 6-8 back to even....

avatar

alls i gots ta say is: CSPAN or, if you like a little commentary, PBS.
i haven't watched cable news for more than 10 min a day in over a year.*
i can feel my IQ improving every day.

*not including Headline News while i'm getting ready for work.

CSPAN would be better, but PBS is OK. I guess David Brooks is supposed to balance Mark Shields. But at least they show most of the speeches.

avatar

Brooks is good for the center-right viewpoint - and between Jim Lehrer and Mark Shields, Brooks is kept under control.

I am really enjoying PBS' coverage. Michelle Obama's giving a good interview right now.

She was unbelievably impressive in that interview! We need more of that blanketing the airwaves in battleground states!

avatar

C-SPAN is your savior.

Could I just add, can we please just have ONE of these posts a day? Everyone just come to the same place, have their dump, take deep breaths, watch some cartoons, and then.... kick back and ENJOY more of the Democratic Spectacle (with associated Top Quality Televisual Commentary.)

But just the one, ok?

Got it? ONE. One (1) blog on it, per day (That's a 24 hour period.)

Make it NCSteve's or liam's or Ripper's or Des' or I really don't give a fuck.... but JUST ONE, YOU FREAKIN' MADMEN, CAUSE NOW YER CLOGGIN' UP MY TPM TOO!!!

My.... Don't I feel just a whole lot better. Thanks X-NCSteve! ;-)

My work here is done.

It's a new day, X-NCSteve. Now get busy & slap another one up there!

It's a new day, X-NCSteve. Now get busy & slap another one up there!

Could I just add, can we please just have ONE of these posts a day?

Just One?

When John McCain was a POW...

Lol!!!!!!

Just for that, you have my vote if you ever decide to run for anything. Including the hills. I just may join you.

Um, wow. Did you guys see this? Looks like Quinn has the older tattooed female demographic locked in, anyway:

http://tinyurl.com/5sa9tt

Hilarious! Loved that, Paige!

LOL Paige. Still not sure I trust the guy though. I mean.... I HEARD he has 7 igloos, a French middle name, and thinks Des would be a "trusted & safe" pick for VP. Thanks for that though, CalPaige. ;-)

Step away from the television...mute and turn to Cspan or pull up the Cspan site on your computer. When you see someone on the screen that you want to listen to or looks interesting turn up volume slowly... if irritation arises mute and repeat.

No point in driving yourself insane.

If no other word enters the Political lexicon, I hope the word Asshat stays with us forever and ever!

Excellent, excellent, excellent post. And hey, even Newsweek mentioned the lack of Convention Coverage in the Convention coverage:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/155647

NC Steve built on that excellent word and gave us "asshattery." Excellent!

"asshattery"

I think that one ranks up there with "truthiness" and should be considered for inclusion in the dictionary at the next vote.

You mean this kinda stuff?

TPMtv Catches Up With Arianna Huffington An Interview With Harry Shearer Paul Begala Tells TPMtv: It's About Hitting First Jim Webb Talks To TPMtv About Obama's Chances In VA See More Videos At TPMtv.com....

Punditry is like plastics used to be, where the money is. The smart ones got in on it even before they invented a thing called blogging to extrapolate the trend.

One difference. Microbes can break most plastics down in a landfill.

I'll bet microbes would break down most pundits, too, if we buried 'em in a landfill.

And if we buried 'em all, end to end, what would we have....?

Blissful quiet. Then this!

My link! My link! What happened to my link?

Try again!

A good start?

I am currently in a hotel in PA with only Fox or CNN. I didn't realize how bad CNN is. It truly is Fox lite. I cannot stream CSPAN nor do I have a radio. My brain cells are crying. The truth shall set you free...if you can find it. Thank god for blogs.

Poor, poor Ms. J. I was in that situation once. I went out w/ my laptop and wandered until I found a spot where I could steal WiFi!

Go to the 'Span baby!

The idiocy of the commentary, even on MSNBC, is killing brain cells by the trillions all over America!

After Hillary's incredible speech, CNN made sure they went right to those who still want HRC as POTUS.

CNN - McCain's New Best Friend!

I'm all about the CSPAN, homie. I feel you, 100%. Recommended as fuck.

Good rant...thanks for the laugh. PBS has been just fine, Brooks is under control and even genuinely complimentary at times.

If I watch the other stuff, I go bat-shit crazy inside 10 minutes.

Yeah, Brooks better watch it or they're going to take away his Republican card.

Yeah, Brooks better watch it or they're going to take away his Republican card.

OMG...I just finished reading this out loud to my hubby...except I had to stop a few times..because I was laughing so hard I was tearing up and could not see my screen.

This post was the most hilarious thing I have seen in a long time. The best comedy is the absurdity of the truth!!!

Thanks Steve, we really needed a good laugh. :)

avatar

Well, I bet the Democrats have better music...

Alejandro Escovedo? Word!

Michelle's interview on PBS was outstanding, as was Deval Patrick's speech which they kindly taped for us while they were interviewing her. No one saw them because of the blathering of the talking hairdos. Lily Ledbetter gave a moving speech about her Equal Pay Act loss in the Supreme Court and the way the Republicans in the Senate blocked the vote to fix it, touchingly authentic in its delivery. And I loved the way she had the brass to stand there and read it out to this room full of professional and semi-pro politicians. The blathering hairdos deemed their asshattery more important.

I only subject myself to this torture because I really want to try to get a grip on how most of the people watching this thing are experiencing it. I'd love to see some ratings.

But damn, at least everyone at MSNBC other than chief of asshattery Gregory was duly and appropriately impressed with Hillary's speech.

My favorite CNN moments (I tuned in after watching Hillary's speech on CSPAN) was the bozo who they interviewed just after the speech (she was near in tears) and the nutjob on Larry King.

Both talked in terms of "not feeling courted enough." Leave it to these types to compare electing the president of the United States "giving it up" on a date.

Their anger has little to do with this election and more to do with issues outside of it. But I now understand your irritation: it's clear there most people are these types of nutcases and CNN is selecting them in a way similar to FNC selects "the other side" for their "debates".

Using the term "nutjob" to describe that woman on Larry King is being incredibly generous.

And it is far more important to track and squeeze ever last erg of precious trash out of one person with deviant views than to, say, give us some flavor of how most people responded.

Maybe tomorrow, Larry can score a big interview with one of those meth-using Nazis who got busted on Sunday. They're views are very important too, representing, as they do, hundreds of people around America.

Is an asshat a cover for the bald spot? Sorry...couldn't resist.....

Yes. But it has a considerable drawback. As with all hats, when you take it off....that's right: asshat crack head. Even more unsightly than the hat or the bald spot.

"Just Say No"

That made sick and, uh, crack me up at the same time.

Oooo - that was so good. So good!!!!!!!!

I'm jealous. :)

Asshats is a great addition.

My wife snd I decided to actually watch the convention tonite and how refreshing. Nice HD feed on Dish and ATTACK we did...of course you'd never know that from any cable channel....

What strikes me is how ignorant most of these experts are.....

This entire convention's goal is to get the "base" home and Hillary did that last nite in spades.

Once we reach the 85% Dem support this is over. Currently it runs from 69% is NC, 75% in OH in recent polls. In Iowa it is 89 and we are up comfortably.

This is not a "bounce" that will dissipate. Nearly all the "under performance" comes from the divisions from the primaries....

Look at this number in all the polls over the coming weeks and you'll see. Gore got 85% in 2000, Kerry 89% (Bush got 93% of R).

With the 8-10% "generic vote" gap now we'll see our numbers jump....and Romney or Lieberman would only add fuel to that fire as evangelicals jump ship on McCain.

In the south (I'm in Atlanta) Mormons aren't exactly popular w/ the Baptist crowd so it will help us a lot in GA, NC, FL and VA

These commentators are not washed up asshats! Here, I'll explain what they're saying to you so you'll understand.

Obama is outpolling McCain but he somehow hasn't gotten McCain to concede the election. This is because Obama can't "seal the deal" with McCain voters.

Now McCain voters are in the minority, which means that McCain has less of a "deal to seal" than Obama does. Having less "deal to seal" is a definite advantage because while Obama spends his time and money deal sealing, McCain can get on with the business of running the country.

So you see, having more supporters is a real problem for Barack Obama. But it's good news for John McCain.

I feel your pain former Mc Steve. LOL at destor23, both of you capture my mindset of late. I tried PBS, but my body melts down at the visual of David Brooks, so that lasted about 1 min 25 secs....My Dvr gets allot of play switching between both tunners and FF through the asshats comments, drives my girl crazy, but I can't take it either, its the best I got....lol.

avatar

Mark Shields and Jim Lehrer are the Brooks antidote.

The other panel on PBS - the historical one, with Peniel Joseph - is really good, I think.

I'm also watching Gwen Ifill now, and I keep thinking how good she is. After she moderates one of the debates in the fall, I think she'll be big.

avatar

I remember the big bump in Gwen Ifel viewership after the 2004 debate she moderated. She was like a pop star after that.

Yeah turn the channel to PBS or CSPAN. I was incensed to come home the Monday night after listening Harkin introduce former 7 term Republican congressman Jim Leach on NPR in the car to find Tweety yakking over his speech. I turned on PBS to hear the last of Leach's speech about why he's endorsing Obama. Mark Shields was bowled over. If you watched CNN or MSNBC you probably didn't hear a word of it.

We have to write the cable nets and give them hell for their awful manipulation, and that's what it is, of this convention.

sorry NC STEVE

avatar

What do you mean "you people"? j/k

Right there with you, buddy. CNN and Fox are very anti-Obama, but by the same token Olbermann and the chronies at MSNBC are so EXTREMELY pro-Obama that you can't get an impartial analysis there either.

CSPAN and PBS ftw!

I was watching MSNBC, amusing because it looked like either Matthews and Olbermann or Maddow and Buchannan would just physically throw-down and start pounding on each other. And before Hillary's speech they're just talking and talking and talking about the same crap while training a camera right on Bill Clinton's slack-jawed head.

Clinton was slack-jawed not like some yokel, but because he was watching something he was fascinated by. Something he was clearly enjoying. What, I wondered, could so entrance William Jefferson "Bubba" Clinton? If only we could see...

What MSNBC missed was what some are calling the second keynote of the convention, Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer's speech. Thanks to the internets you can see it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8iatxuU3OU

I think I might agree with you more during the RNC convention. I can't resist Keith Olbermann. Yes, I spend a lot of time on CSPAN, and PBS too, but have to flip to the networks now and then during prime time to get a flavor of what they're all saying. I've even turned (turned my stomach that is) to Fox News-which your rant would be too kind to.

I'm going to get killed for this - yeah, Keith Olbermann is good looking and on our side. But I've often wondered just how bright he really is, cause I don't think for real that he is that bright. I've heard him say some egregiously stupid things.

Frankly, there isn't one American talking head I'd give $.15 to save from drowning.

Ouch Tena...lol....
First you forgave Hillary, now Olberman isnt that bright......What happened to one of my favorite posters...(smile)....
Nah, just kidding, your entitled to that. I love keith though...

I love him too - I just cringe a lot when I listen to him - and I really wish it wasn't like that.

I really wish he didn't say such astoundingly dumb things from time to time - with an astoundingly smug expression. If he wouldn't do that, I'd stalk him. I'd have his babies. He's been one of the only voices of sanity out there in the last 8 years and I fully appreciate that.

But Stephen Colbert has more guts and way more brains and everybody seems to forget his pivotal role in finally cracking the veneer of the Bush government.

I agree, except for the babies part. Keith can be great, and occasionally says incredibly cringeworthy things.

I feel about Rachel Maddow like you do about Keith, and she never makes me cringe.

I agree, except for the babies part. Keith can be great, and occasionally says incredibly cringeworthy things.

I feel about Rachel Maddow like you do about Keith, and she never makes me cringe.

Everyone says stupid things.....:)

I agree...I really started wondering about him after his apoplectic, slow-burn rant following Hillary's "Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June" moment. He seems like a good product that came in a kit, but somebody assembled the parts incorrectly.

avatar

C-Span

avatar

Really? Gwen Ifill? Have you SEEN her on Washington Week? It used to be a great show, and now it's the Washington Kool Kids Klub.

Until now this 2008 convention has produced only TWO people that remind me of what the Democratic Party once was: Michelle Obama and Governor Swhweitzer.

Since 1968, Democrats have occupied the Whitehouse for 12 years, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush, Bush have had it for 28. So how is it going Democrats? Are 40 years of class warfare on the losing side enough? McCain is not like Bush, he is WORSE than Bush.

Just say goodbye to the legacy of FDR, JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King AND President Clinton. I really think it's over.

Damn, you're a cheerful soul. I wish I was married to you so I could start every single day feeling suicidal.

Come on Barry....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv0smG7ptcM

Did you just say the "legacy of Bill Clinton" in the same sentence as that of JFK, RFK and MLK?

Settle down. Seriously.

avatar

Jeebus, why the hell does everyone forget LBJ? Vietnam? I guess he's the "ugly side" of politics that feel-good Democrats don't want to acknowledge...

avatar

Oh! God!
How I feel the way this poster does!
Unfortunately Americans listen to these idiots. I become very disilusioned about it all and feel that MSM will elect McCain...just like they elected Bush...
We are moving out of the country if McCain wins. We would rather give our tax $ to France or New Zealand. AND, we are in the top bracket and will pay less if McCain wins (that's what McSame says anyway, which I don't see how he can attack every country in the world without our money)

Ok, what side do you think the media is on? Corporations maybe? You seem to excuse the media because they are stupid. But so what? Just draw conclusions based on what you are saying here.

I was watching MSNBC. Did anybody see the part where Tweety was just yakking away, then the producer off camera must have given him the signal to wrap it up, and Tweety got pissed and snapped "I'll wrap it up when I am ready"?

So he finishes his rant, then poor Keith segues to another guest, apologizing for the delay (he used the term yapping). Tweety gets so pissed at Keith that for the next 20 minutes they don't even look at each other.

I hope Keith gets hazard pay for working with that stupid loudmouth.

Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, aka Kos, put it best today:

Damn they love the sound of their own voices. Could they please shut the fuck up and let people digest the proceedings on their own? Do they have so little regard for their audience that they think people need DC- and NYC-based blowhards to tell them what to think?

And yes, the simple answer is "yes".

MSNBC does express viewpoints not seen anywhere else in MSM. Still the wrong message is getting out there. I just think the Clinton and Biden need to come through tonight big time.

Have a nice day folks.

Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, aka Kos, put it best today:

Damn they love the sound of their own voices. Could they please shut the fuck up and let people digest the proceedings on their own? Do they have so little regard for their audience that they think people need DC- and NYC-based blowhards to tell them what to think?

And yes, the simple answer is "yes".

I saw the speech by Dennis Kucinich. Not bad, but he is then labeled "socialist." That's how the message is degraded and marginalized, labeling. Swift boat, swift boat, swift boat. Not a problem I guess.

BTW, you don't have to be suicidal to see things this way, in fact it is a common belief in some places. My point is that the election process is defined in this country, held hostage maybe, by interests of wealth and power. How do you deal with that.

As I mentioned here:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/why-the-convention-is-a-disapp.php

the problem is *us*. When more people think globally, and not about their local situation, we will have more global solutions that benefit more people.

In the meantime, we get the comfort of rhetoric that, despite everything everyone claims, is really what we *want* to hear.

But that's backwards, darlin.

Politics is the art of controlling your environment and everyone's environment is local. It's locally that we can as individuals make any difference at all - and if we all work that way, then it spreads upward.

That's what Obama keeps trying to get through people's heads.

I think we are in violent agreement.

Isn't the phrase: think globally, act locally?

I believe both of us keyed in on different aspects of that.

And I do get shivers when you slather your TX accent on "darlin" to me. ;-)

avatar

CNN = STFU!

I saw the speech by Dennis Kucinich. Not bad, but he is then labeled "socialist." That's how the message is degraded and marginalized, labeling. Swift boat, swift boat, swift boat. Not a problem I guess.

BTW, you don't have to be suicidal to see things this way, in fact it is a common belief in some places. My point is that the election process is defined in this country, held hostage maybe, by interests of wealth and power. How do you deal with that.

avatar

CNN didn't even make it out of the starting gate Monday night before demonstrating a lack of comprehension of facts and history.

A group of remaining Navajo Code Talkers served as color guard. As they marched onto the stage, Blitzer stentoriously opined how great their service had been in WW II keeping communications secret from the NAZIs !! One of his fellow yakking heads jumped in to declare that the Nazis had never broken the code. That last nugget is technically true, since the Code Talkers were assigned to the Marines in the Pacific theater of the war. You don't even have to know any history to know that it was the Japanese who couldn't crack the code: there was a big budget movie with Nicolas Cage for Christ's sake. They probably ran ads on CNN.

Last night the CNN people were yakking on while speaker's names were being projected on the stage. I saw Cecile Richards' and Dennis Kucinich's names up there. A little bit later, one of the yakkers complains about the lack of really redmeat attacks on McCain and the GOP. I couldn't help think that this might be because they weren't listening to any of the speaches.

I'm with Steve: STFU.

avatar

CNN didn't even make it out of the starting gate Monday night before demonstrating a lack of comprehension of facts and history.

A group of remaining Navajo Code Talkers served as color guard. As they marched onto the stage, Blitzer stentoriously opined how great their service had been in WW II keeping communications secret from the NAZIs !! One of his fellow yakking heads jumped in to declare that the Nazis had never broken the code. That last nugget is technically true, since the Code Talkers were assigned to the Marines in the Pacific theater of the war. You don't even have to know any history to know that it was the Japanese who couldn't crack the code: there was a big budget movie with Nicolas Cage for Christ's sake. They probably ran ads on CNN.

Last night the CNN people were yakking on while speaker's names were being projected on the stage. I saw Cecile Richards' and Dennis Kucinich's names up there. A little bit later, one of the yakkers complains about the lack of really redmeat attacks on McCain and the GOP. I couldn't help think that this might be because they weren't listening to any of the speaches.

I'm with Steve: STFU.

I saw the speech by Dennis Kucinich. Not bad, but he is then labeled "socialist." That's how the message is degraded and marginalized, labeling. Swift boat, swift boat, swift boat. Not a problem I guess. BTW, you don't have to be suicidal to see things this way. My point is that the election process is defined in this country, held hostage maybe, by interests of wealth and power. How do you deal with that.

Of course you are correct. But should we throw on black masks and toss stink bombs on Main St. in Denver or try and fix this shit from the inside?

See my response to this question to one of your posts above.

Gee, I might be able to get all outraged if Dennis Kucinich wasn't a bit of a hypocrite and all.

The man is anti-choice - or was, dedicated to it - before he decided to run for president.

Plus Dennis is wacky - let's face it. He breaks into song during speeches. We have one wacky president now - I don't want another one.

Yes, but everytime he gets camera time, so does his wife. (Oh stop. You know you were all thinking it.)

avatar

Ah yes. The wonderfully, blissfully gorgeous Mrs. Kucinich. Hottest. Redhead. Ever.

avatar

Thank you Formerly. I vented vicariously through your vent. I think I have shouted every word of your rant at my TV over the past few months, along with the occasional pounding on my coffee table.

Its funny, but its not. I feel like you're tapping in to a bubbling caldera of like minded anger and frustration, but I wonder what can be done constructively to make a difference. How can we affect change, if we (America) are spoon fed BS that drives people away from candidates who might actually affect change?

How do we take back our media? Sure, youTube and the blogosphere is part of the solution, but we as a people should vote on the media, with our feet and demand a better discourse and more content - y'know reporting on things that actually happened, not pontificating on what may happen or what could happen (or reciting partisan talking points).

What's the solution? How can we take millions of pissed off viewers and turn them in to a movement which can improve news coverage, even on a bipartisan basis?

Oh I don't put Clinton in the same league as the others I mentioned. However he could play a role this year if he would. Low probability.

I think Obama gets elected and he turns everything around. In this country that's the only way you can induce change, elect the people who share your ideas.

Thank you for saying exactly what I've been thinking this whole week and actually for awhile leading up to this week. I have no respect for these blowhards on television. There is no shred of journalism or reporting going on. It's a bunch of gossipers. They get on tv and throw out some juicy piece of unsubstantiated bullshit that they make up and then have a group of people sitting around gossiping about it, pretending that it's news that they're covering. It's pretty disgusting to watch.

You can stream the convention via http://www.demconvention.com/


But the United Statesians we need to reach are not the ones who are internet savvy. Therefore I propose sacrificing Tom Brokaw guillotine style, on live TV, as sort of a "warning shot." Maybe then they'll all shut up. If not, we just let the blood run redder.

Thank you NC Steve and others for a deja vu moment. I can not stand the "asshattery" that is going on between all the cable networks coverage of the DNC convention. And yet I keep hearing stories about how cable ratings are on the up and up vs traditional news stations. Personally I thin this is a marketing ploy to get us all hooked on constructed TV rather than honest journalism and coverage of local and national events.

Did any of you guys watch the olympics? It is ridiculous that in today's day in age that a network such as NBC would edit out each event which they did not think would be good for their ratings. I understand that they are in the business to make money and that certain events get better crowds but it was hard to see any even, especially the track and field events in their entirety. I stayed up late to watch many of the events but most of what was shown was the events of the favored competitors rather than all the nations who were competing in the events. DOn't get me started on the Fu&^ing commercials! I mean really do I really want to pay xxx dollars a month to watch fricking advertisements? It's absurd and reminds of this great sci-fi story called My Flamboyant Grandson by George Saunders. IF this is the world that America wants then I clearly have issues with Americanism!

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address