« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Dear Josh Marshall - You Make No Sense Again
Josh invites us this morning to stop whatever we're doing to check out the new campaign insight from New York Magazine.
http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/48928/
Here's the distillation of the article:
"But with the weeklong string of attacks uncorked by the Arizona senator and his people during Obama’s trip abroad and in its aftermath—some brutal, some mocking, but all personal and focused on Obama’s character—we now have an inkling of just how deep in the mud McCain and his people are willing to wallow in order to win in November: right up to their Republican eyeballs"
As always, Josh Marshall is high on kool-aid and cannot see past the, er, talking points memo from the Obama campaign.
Here's a message to Josh Marshall: your subtle, manipulative and suggestive moral indignation is not worth the key strokes.
You and others like you (formerly known as progressives) have led and clapped at the attack on the wholesale character assasination of Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Remember that? Say anything to win, et al?
Sorry, Josh, after what you and your candidate did to a fellow Democrat, your tsk tsk outrage has ZERO credibilty.
If it was OK for Obama to campaign this way against someone, then it's OK for others to do the same.
You should really be focusing on helping Obama focus on economy, jobs, gas prices and national security. Not on explaining the details of poor blond girl/horny black man stereotypes.
But this is not the first time you completely miss the point.








Comments (66)
You Hillary dead-enders have grown not merely tiresome, but fucking pathetic.
You remind me of a junior high school dumpee.
August 2, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry to interpt you jerking off at Obama. You can now resume.
August 2, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yawn...
These Clinton deadenders, if brains were gas, these folks wouldn't have enough fuel to power a moped round a fruit loop.
Seriously.
Get over yourselves.
August 3, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, asshole, I'm a Democrat.
Period.
I support my party's candidate.
If you can't handle that, then fuck off. I have a zero-tolerance policy for jerk-offs who seek to undermine my country.
August 2, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Make me fuck off, ass-wipe
Obama branded half of your party uneducated bitter racists when he accused their candidate of racist smears against Him, the pampered, pom-pom Prom King.
And when the likes of Josh Marshall, Kos, Clyburn and others like you (who had seen the light and read the talking points memo) joined the chorus, you opened that door. And now it's going to hit you on the ass.
What goes around comes around, just ask Britney.
August 2, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a classy exchange between coralsea and Lala35adm! As usual, the Obama backer started the outburst of obscenities, but now, unlike primary season, Clinton supporters reply in kind.
Coralsea occasionally posts something worthwhile, but immediately going over to "fucking pathetic" whenever anyone reminds us that Hillary Clinton was accused of racism and even plotting the assassination of Barack Obama, all over the internet...
Yeah, the Democrats are a messed up party, with no more real principles than their "presumptive nominee," who now favors off-shore drilling, and explains that it really isn't a flipflop since he favored offshore drilling all along... We just didn't know it.
So this is a rambling post about Obama and the miserable condition of the Democratic Party, and I'm not apologizing for its lack of focus, because at least I didn't call any other commenters "ass-hole" or "ass-wipe," and that makes me a model of civilized behavior in the current atmosphere on TPMCafe.
August 2, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I found the article kind of desperate and full of purple prose, "attacked uncorked . . . an inkling of how deep in the mud the McCain campaign will wallow . . ." please!!
For those who have doubts about him, this kind of article only reinforces the image of Obama as an elitist and part of an elite East coast clique. That NY Mag would be so shocked!! that a campaign would stoop so low!! oohwee.
I was kind of surprised at Marshall's earnest (almost frantic) insistence on seeing the material. Because he was here, loud and clear, for Swiftboat.
He must feel for Obama.
August 2, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's "feel" for Obama.
August 2, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's a message to Lalo35adm: your subtle, manipulative and suggestive moral indignation is not worth the key strokes.
August 2, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
May the Lord smite you with boils and frogs you pathetic troglodyte
August 2, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo35adm:
I can understand your loyalty to HRC, but could you please enlighten me as to what you are attempting to achieve with all the negative (anti-Obama and his supporters) posts and comments? What is your goal? Thanks.
August 2, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
To make you understand that if you start character attacks, you will have to deal with attacks on your own character later. This has just been demonstrated to us by Mr. McCain.
Instead of trying to do the same thing to McCain now as you and your crowd did to Hillary, you should borrow a page from her book and start hitting him where he hurts.
And that's not his age, senility, racism and other crap like that.
It's jobs, jobs, jobs, economy, gas prices, security, etc.
It would really help your guy right now if he could campaign like Hillary did from February until the end.
But I fear you're too cool for that.
August 2, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for reply.
"Instead of trying to do the same thing to McCain now as you and your crowd did to Hillary, you should borrow a page from her book and start hitting him where he hurts." Would you please be specific? I'm still not sure what this means.
Also, you didn't state what your specific goal is with these posts.
Again, I do appreciate your on point responses.
August 2, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
what, too cool AND too dumb?
Josh Marshall has been obsessing about vulnerable white blonde/horny black man stereotype for two days in a row and completely misdirecting his troops.
Instead of rallying the ObamArmy to fight back with the effective "talking points" memo, he's desperate to make everyone focus on the finer details of the McCain commercial.
August 2, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps he's trying to build awareness as to McCain's actions.
You still have not addressed the query regarding your goal.
It's puzzling why you feel the need to attempt to ridicule me personally. My goal is to achieve understanding of your messages and to have a positive dialogue. If you would prefer not to engage in a positive dialogue, that's your choice too. But, this would be acknowledging you don't believe there is a valid basis of your posts.
So, care to continue and have some positive discourse?
August 2, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nah. I keep explaining and you keep not understanding.
One last time - Josh Marshall is trying to pull of a copy of his very successful South Carolina "Cinton Racist" trick. It's not working, yet Marshall keeps trying. In the process, he's wasting time.
And nobody amongh the faithful would tell him he needs to stop trying to whip up the SC-style outrage and start focusing on the fucking talking points.
But maybe Josh Marshall is just good at injecting subtle moral indignation, not strategy.
August 2, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. And I cannot disagree that it would have served the purpose better to follow up with the talking points.
It's never productive to only cite the problem without putting forth a positive solution. Or, at very least, to identify some avenues to achieve the resolution.
Stating the problem/concern/negative is easy - but without the added insight/idea on how to address and resolve the issue, it usually only serves to stir the pot, building dissenion not unification.
Got your point (Finally, Duh!).
August 2, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think there's a discussion going on here Aunt Sam, but for some reason, all of lalo35admin's comments are blank. There's nothing there.
Has this been a problem for anyone else?
August 2, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only for those with the blinders in the "ON" position.
August 2, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sir, don't believe you addressed this from my first reply comment.
.....could you please enlighten me as to what you are attempting to achieve with all the negative (anti-Obama and his supporters) posts and comments?
August 2, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sometimes forget to take my Prozac, so it comes out the way it does. But you are ever so inquisitive!?!?!
August 2, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we don't ask the questions, we'll never receive any answers. And are you trying to deflect in order not to give direct answer?
You seem to be very focused on your posts and therefore, I'm sure you have a firm stance/motivation as to your motivation. I am sincerely interested in ascertaining specifics of your goal.
I do not want to 'not hear you or discount your message' because of erroneous assumptions on my part. I try to base my thoughts on facts, not suppositions. So, please enlighten me!
August 2, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you'd care to jump in and fill in the blanks, go for it!
Actually, the discussion is turning out to be productive and interesting. Come on it and engage!
August 2, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops - Reply to tpmgary!
August 2, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This post assumes Obama's campaign was about the Clintons' character assassination. So let me see... Obama told President Clinton to reduce Obama to a Black candidate; Obama told Senator Clinton to diminish Martin Luther King's contributions in deference to President Johnson; Obama made those Clinton staff spread rumors defaming Obama... And of course, Obama made Senator Clinton point out that white voters would vote only for her and not for Obama.
And of course, now Obama should go out and scream "shame on you John McCain!" and put out a "3 AM" ad, never mind his campaign promise to be a different kind of politician. If McCain breaks his promise, so should Obama.
Yes, I see very clear - how could I have been so stupid? Thanks, Lalo35adm, for showing me the light!
August 2, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama didn't have to ask President Clinton to do any of these things. His campaign simply had to insinuate that President Clinton did them.
And as I can see from your reply the message worked.
What puzzles and amuses me is your refusal to admit that McCain just stole that trick from Obama and suddenly Obama has nothing to say.
And Josh Marshall is getting all sweaty trying to work up the same anger as we had in SC. One trick pony...
August 2, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reposted:
.....could you please enlighten me as to what you are attempting to achieve with all the negative (anti-Obama and his supporters) posts and comments?
You seem to be very focused on your posts and therefore, I'm sure you have a firm stance/motivation as to your motivation. I am sincerely interested in ascertaining specifics of your goal.
I do not want to 'not hear you or discount your message' because of erroneous assumptions on my part. I try to base my thoughts on facts, not suppositions. So, please enlighten me!
August 2, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
No offense, but you're looking for enlightenment from this poster?
I'd be better off baning my head against the wall than look for enlightenment from the above post. (or any of Lalo35adm posts for that matter)
August 3, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right... So McCain puts out an ad showing Obama alongside Britney Spears and Paris Hilton - either suggesting Obama is as vacuous as the two (Clinton's favorite argument, by the way, disregarding the man's two decades of public life and many more achievements), or (and?) making a subliminal suggestion similar to the attacks on Harold Ford, Jr. And then McCain insinuates Obama is racist.
I can see where Obama made the comments disparaging MLK's contributions, or said he himself is a Black candidate (as opposed to a Presidential candidate with a much wider support base who happens to be Black), and then accused Clinton of doing these things. Yes, the parallels are very striking.
August 2, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"And then McCain insinuates Obama is racist." Or says Obama is playing the race card.
August 2, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Empty. No specifics on the supposedly numerous character attacks by Obama---because he did not attack Hillary's character.
August 2, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wright is Wrong, yet again. But a good tactic, the burial of specifics.
August 2, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It certainly seems to work for you.
However, I agree that the focus should be on what matters to our country and not on inane advertising.
August 2, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
This site has an archive full of specifics. People who comment on this thread are exactly the same people who were commenting at the height of SC racism circus. I don't need to provide them with specifics, they know exactly what I'm talking about, so I won't take the bait from drive-by comments.
In any case, specifics is a request that should be urgently and insistently delivered to Obama. Perhaps that would be a better use of Josh Marshall's time and energy.
August 2, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I somehow doubt the Obama campaign is waiting with baited breath for Josh Marshall's latest musings. Or, quite frankly, yours.
I also doubt that Barak Obama needs to be versed in specifics.
August 2, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know if he needs to or not, he doesn't have specifics and that's fine with me.
The point about specifics was to deflect a typical TPM drive-by trick of dismissing a thought with request for specifics.
August 2, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, you misrepresent my last sentence to suit your own opinion. It is clear we disagree about Obama's grasp of specific facts. I believe he has the intelligence, knowledge and ability to seek additional information in order to form a measured and complete opinion. As well as the desired human capacity to adjust that opinion as required by facts.
August 2, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo35adm, you are incoherent.
Go cry us a river.
~
August 2, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am glad to see the person who thinks that those who do not make--term used loosely, it is mostly investment income after all--enough money to get in the top 10% income percentile (whom, according to you, are entitled to be given more money on the expense of the other 90%) is lecturing others about being "former progressives."
Fuck you.
August 2, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You make no sense, but given that you and John McCain are the same age, it's forgivable. Senility is acquired, not something you were born with, I'm sure.
August 2, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reposted again:
.....could you please enlighten me as to what you are attempting to achieve with all the negative (anti-Obama and his supporters) posts and comments?
You seem to be very focused on your posts and therefore, I'm sure you have a firm stance/motivation as to your motivation. I am sincerely interested in ascertaining specifics of your goal.
I do not want to 'not hear you or discount your message' because of erroneous assumptions on my part. I try to base my thoughts on facts, not suppositions. So, please enlighten me!
August 2, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect his motivation is to annoy us, dear Aunt.
August 2, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, then, mission accomplished
August 3, 2008 5:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's working out his own manipulative and very faux moral indignation and blames Josh for giving him the opportunity...
August 2, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo35adm,
Your quote of the article did not capture its central point. The following is a better distillation:
If you are to take Josh to task for bringing this to the fore, you need to argue with this judgment. The argument about what Obama did or did not do to HRC is not germane to whether Obama will or will not crumple.
In any case, you seem to wish to have your cake and eat it too. You deplore the focus on the horse race but then complain loudly about how one of the ponies was treated in the barn.
August 2, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm one of those commentators that have been here for most of the primary season and I recall you and your various incarnations. All of them had one thing in common, a clear disdain for facts that were at odds with the theory you were propounding on a given day. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
As Josh noted, he is not approaching this McCain flap with suggestions about how Obama should respond. Instead his goal is to shine a light on the tactics being employed by McCain. Whether you agree with his decision is immaterial. It's his site and you are welcome to not post or visit--though we both know that is unlikely.
Obama doesn't need advice on how to respond to McCain any more than you need to be reminded that your posts are largely designed to get under the skin of Obama supporters. He knows what he is doing and we all know that you know what you are doing. And therein lies the lesson for today: you can't control what other people will say or do.
I could post a litany of links to articles recounting with mind-numbing accuracy of what occurred during the primary that corrects the distortions littered throughout your post. But to what end? You have access to that same information and have arrived at your conclusion in spite of them. Why? Because this isn't about being accurate or advancing the progressive agenda. This is about you getting your jollies off fucking with commentators with thinner skin. You revel in their anxiety and frustration. In short, this is entertainment for you. That's why you come here and that's why you won't ever leave.
August 2, 2008 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear. I couldn't have said it better myself.
August 3, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
People like Josh are trying to provide Obama with an excuse for losing that will let him run again in 2012. For my money, if he blows it, he should hang them up like Gore and Kerry before him. Can the second coming come twice? He's shopworn already. By 2012 he'll be a bore.
August 3, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would agree with the premise that the Obama campaign led and clapped at the attack on the wholesale character assasination of Bill and Hillary Clinton, not to mention their supporters, during the primaries. As to whether Josh/TPM 'led' that, I can't say that I saw that here. I thought the staff played it fairly straight (with a lean to Obama) in their coverage. Just my opinion...
August 2, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Publicola...
Well said and spot on...
Great Post...
August 2, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hate man - sorry - Hat man, you are delusional. End of story.
August 2, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent point and post.
August 2, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh come on--Hillary sucks. So does Bill. America is better off without them. The Hill and Bill show is over. Hillary will never be president. God bless America.
August 3, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear. I couldn't have said it better myself.
August 3, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The wholesale character assasination of Bill and Hillary Clinton" --- what alternative universe are YOU living in? Or is quoting people accurately now "character assasination"? If you have so head so far up your butt about the Cliuntons, go help her pay off the debt she incurred when she persisted in a vanity campaign after she had lost.
August 3, 2008 1:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
She still owes over six grand for fucking PIZZA. Millionaires--they think the world owes them a living.
August 3, 2008 1:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo:
I believe you have a point, because I believe that the fraudulent charges of racism levied implcity and expressly by so many on the left at Hillary Clinton and those of us who supported her, make similar and perhaps more meritorious charges levied at the McCain campaign ring hollow for so many. Aesop told fables and they have endured for a reason.
But your attack on Josh Marshall (whom I have often criticized in this campaign) rings equally hollow and I think all you have done is ratchet up distrust among Democrats. You've just written a piece that haters crave, and your substantive point is lost in the morass. Big Ten Democrat at Talk Left makes your point with lasting effect. He writes:
"The fairy tale has come home to roost. All the dirty work these folks did during the primaries to slime Bill and Hillary Clinton is now fodder for John McCain. Of course he was going to going dirty, ugly, negative and would race bait. The wonder is none of these folks realized that when they said and did anything about Bill and Hillary Clinton to favor Obama that all of it would come back to haunt Obama in the general election".
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/8/2/94026/81635
BTD and I support Senator Obama without reservation, but BTD and I, and I think you as well, also believe that the charges of racism levied at fellow core Democrats during the primaries will come back to hurt Senator Obama's chances. The key is that BTD resonates with real liberals and Democrats, and in contrast you just brought out the haters for recommendations and another 15 minutes of fame.
Yes, Aesop's fables have endured. But they have so endured because he sought to teach and not hate his listeners.
You can do better.
Bruce
August 3, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. I don't mean to suggest that BTD lets Josh off the hook so to speak. BTD is also critical of Josh among many for being careless with the flames of racism during the Democratic primaries. But he doesn't call him a kool-aid drinker who makes no sense. I guess that's my main point.
The corollary and perhaps more lasting point is that, what I really think went on during the campaign is that there were good people on two sides of an issue who saw entirely different things. Many Obama supporters, including IMO Josh Marshall, saw the use of racism or worse in the Clinton campaign (although unlike others, I think Josh made it clear that he didn't think it was fair to call those of us who supported Clinton racists or supporters or condoners of racebaiting tactics). On the other hand, while many of us, including yours truly, blanched at some misstatements during the primaries, we thought the charge of racism directed at the Clintons was on par with the small but vocal minority of Israel's American "supporters" who label any criticism of Israel to be anti-semitic.
Two good people can see the same thing differently. It's just hard to accept that in the heat of the moment.
August 3, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
The question Axelrod and Obama are struggling with is how to continue to play to their uninformed, gullible and enthusiastic base without being laughed at by every grown-up voter in America. It's a little like watching a Disney idol try to go mainstream. Obama has to hope his base will grow up before November so that he can run a grown-up campaign.
August 3, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please don't tell me his supporters think the elections will be moderated by Ryan Seacrest and results of the cell phone vote will be announced on FOX the following Wednesday.
August 3, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
The latest "Latest" from Josh Marshall only serves to reinforce the point:
"Latest (angry) McCain ad: (Black guy) Obama doesn't care about hispanics. "
What's up with the BLACK obsession Josh?? Why do you keep trying to drum up moral outrage?
You candidate tried a dual strategy to deal with his race:
- inject it himself to innoculate his campaign ("And did I mention that he's black?")
- take advantage of it by accusing everyone else of racism (Jackson, Clyburn, et al)
It backfired big time with the dollar bill bait that he so stupidly took. It's time to think about a better way to deal with it.
And yet, if I wasn't around long enough, I would have wondered by now why you constantly obsess about racism and seem unable to regroup, rethink and move on. Given your own position on charges of Clinton racism in SC, I'm sorry Josh, but you've become a joke without credibility.
August 3, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
They're trying to set up an acceptable excuse if Obama loses to McCain in November, no matter how unlikely that seems. They need an excuse that will let Obama run again in 2012, so they are setting up the Bradley effect and racism as the only reason Obama can lose.
August 3, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think he needs an "excuse" to run for President. He won the nomination once, he can do it again. By your logic, Hillary shouldn't run for President because she lost in the primaries and has no excuse (although you Clintonites do try and spin wacky conspiracy theories).
August 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's not what Billy said.
He said Obama needs an "excuse" if he loses. Pinning it on race will be the excuse.
Read much?
August 3, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm saying the talk of excuses is pointless. Read much?
August 3, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait a minute people!
One cotton-picking second.
I wasn't born stateside and am often very surprised at the strange and unexpected ways race manifests itself in the native-born American psyche.
It often appears to be bubbling along just below the surface somewhere between consciosness and subconciosness in many an American.
It is undeniable that Obama's father's skin color makes a significant difference to many Americans in their choice of President.
Now, every time "race" is mentioned by anyone on either side, a whole hullabaloo erupts with everyone coming out with long, seemingly shop worn positions, as if they have been thinking about it for quite a while.
The accusation that "race has been injected" into the campaign is wholly innacurate and disengenuous for the campaign in the American elecorate - you can't inject something if it is already there.
The feighned outrage on either side is foolish as well - it only serves to reinforce the fake and fragile balance the whole issue of race has taken in the American society. On one side, the race has to be "ignored" in our "equal" society, on the other side it is on everyone's mind pretty much all of the time.
As someone who was not born here, I find that a social construct of "race" is something that most Americans who were raised here are keenly and sensitively aware of and affected by. There are compex social rules and symbols that you people are socialized into from an early age, like a secret handshakes of "race understanding". These secrets are different between different groups of Americans and since any real dialogue on these issues are really not allowed in the main stream these days, the dichotomy of race continues to divide this country.
For the record, Obama is biologically "bi-racial", with a mother who looks pretty lilly-white to me (but what do I know - since I go by skin color I have "wrongly considered" people's race divisions any number of times). This would place him in "no man's land" of America's unspoken racial divide.
I don't really think there is a "winning strategy" for his predicament. But talking clearly about it may be a good start.
August 3, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment