Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

A Myth - John McCain's Leadership Ability

avatar

The myth that John McCain is prepared to be president and has the leadership skills necessary for the job need to be debunked. Take a look at this commentary from no less than the Wall Street Journal Digital Service - Marketplace - written by their Washington Bureau Chief. It'll open your eyes.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B4914192B-12AF-4623-AB18-5EFE91204B04%7D&print=true&dist=printMidSection


Comments (12)

Rec'd. That is a great article. I read it yesterday. And while you are reading Marketwatch, Paul Farrell, a long time conservative absolutely rips the GOP a new one:

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/eleven-reasons-america-new-top/story.aspx?guid=%7BD23E1901%2D728E%2D4A3C%2D99D1%2D7E80F74C3AE3%7D&dist=TNMostRead

avatar

What a depressing article. Its impact for me wasn't so much that it was an attack on the GOP but that it's hard to see how anyone has any solution. Everyone's living in la la land.

avatar

This post has a must read link, as well as the first comment by MsJoanne. Both are gems.

avatar

Bottomline, McCain needs to be vetted!

*His flipflops
*His grovelling to the rightwing/Bush/Rove
*His use of racist slurs like "gook"
*His betrayal of his wife Carol after her car accident
*His mistress/lobbyist Vicki Iseman

avatar

Wow, a commentary in the WSJ nailing John McCain. What next?

"Who Does McCain Remind you of? A New Game for Hard Times"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/

I found it interesting that articles like these would be found in "Market Watch." Is it possible that the blind following McCain will begin to see the light if they read articles in publications like this?

We can only hope and it sure can't hurt!

Roughly half the voting age population of this country can not read above the 5th grade reading level. How many NASCAR fans read "Market Watch"?

avatar

So boil it down and explain it to some of them. That's what I'm doing.

avatar

On the day after Russia invaded Georgia, Barack Obama urged even-handed “restraint” on both sides without mentioning Russia by name or rebuking its aggression. The Russians took the Obama Doctrine as another green light—not just for their attack but also for extending their power in the foreseeable future under a potential Obama administration. Having dealt with the pesky issue of war, Obama turned to the more pressing matter of his Hawaiian vacation. His statement about his day in paradise was more focused than his statement on the Russian invasion.

Here’s what was on Obama’s mind as the Russian army plunged deep into the heart of the Georgian democracy and bombed civilians: “I’m going to get a plate lunch. I might go to Zippy’s. I might go to Rainbow Drive-In. I haven’t decided yet. Get some Zip Min. I’m going to go get some shave ice. I’m going to go body surfing at an undisclosed location. I’m going to see my tutu — my grandma — and I’m going to watch my girls play on the beach, and once in a while I might go into the water. But mostly I’m going to watch them.”

What a Loser. I hope he gets indigestion, he certainly gave me some.

So 'Bill', what would you have him do? Outside of denouncing the violence and calling for diplomacy, do you know what the other options are? Are you aware of who started the recent bloodshed? You might be surprised if you think Russia just woke up and sent a bunch of tanks and troops across the border that morning.

An even-handed call for restraint while gathering more information is almost certainly a better reaction than belligerently calling for actions which would lead to war which is what McCain did. President Bush himself did more or less what Obama did, which was to call for a ceasefire and take the time to find out more about what was going on before making any more detailed statements.

The president's job in a crisis is to remain cool and collected while everyone else falls to pieces so that when it's decision time, he makes a rational (not emotional) and intelligently thought our choice that serves the nation's best interests. Escalating this conflict by bellicose statements is NOT in the nation's best interest.

avatar

Bill first of all you're incorrect about Obama not having mentioned Russia in his statement. Here's the quote - "I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Georgia, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict. Now is the time for Georgia and Russia to show restraint, and to avoid an escalation to full scale war. Georgia’s territorial integrity must be respected. All sides should enter into direct talks on behalf of stability in Georgia, and the United States, the United Nations Security Council, and the international community should fully support a peaceful resolution to this crisis.”

Beyond that Obama greenlighted nothing. He's not the president. Your analysis is overly simplistic and assumes that the Georgians had no hand in this, which would be incorrect. You also seems to be of the mind that America knows best and should take charge in any world crisis. The green light for this conflict preceded anything either Obama or McCain could have said yesterday. If anything, McCain's stance on Georgia over the years has been in line with the confrontational "democracy building" philosophy of the Bush administration; and we all know how well that works. In fact McCain's initial statement bordered on bellicose and is a prime example of how the current administration works.

Ariana Huffington has a great piece too:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/obamas-vacation-assignmen_b_118253.html

Here's an excerpt:

Sure, we can read too much into polling swings, but when poll after poll has McCain with a sizable double-digit edge on security issues and Iraq it shows that the job of undermining this perception has not even begun. Rasmussen has McCain with a 51 percent to 39 percent lead on Iraq, and a 52 to 40 lead on national security. Time shows McCain leading on Iraq 51 percent to 36 percent, and on the war on terror 56 to 29.

Yes, voters continue to say the economy is their top concern but, come November, national security will once again trump every issue -- as it has since 9/11. Something will happen - even if it's nothing more than yet another Osama tape -- to remind the American people that the ability to keep us safe in these dangerous times is job one for the new president. So allowing the GOP to claim it has the advantage on this is nothing less than disastrous for Democrats. Just ask President Kerry.

I'm not saying Obama shouldn't have fought back against McCain's pathetic attacks of the last month. But the problem is that McCain has carved out a small playing field on the electoral landscape and lured Obama into it. McCain would love it if the rest of the race is a tit for tat about celebrity and Britney and Paris. He realizes that if his hold on national security were to be aggressively challenged, his lead on that issue would evaporate. So I'm sure he's thrilled to keep the fighting far away from the one thing that could put him in the White House: the idea that he's somehow better at dealing with national security.

She's right. Obama has to hit him with the facts of his non-leadership or the October surprise that we all know is coming will drastically move the goofy electorate to vote their fears without the information they need about who can actually help.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address