« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
A modest suggestion
I have a suggestion which might clear up so much of the
corruption and mudslinging that politicians trade in. It might remove so
much of the scandal and distortions, the media wallows in, and which so much of
our politics is based on and get us back to the issues which NEED a better
airing.
Make then meet the same requirements we make our troops when they join. A
simple back ground investigation, each time they run for office including state
offices.
All files and secrets open NO off limits areas at all. Make them prove
they are as fit to serve this country as we make the people who volunteer for
duty on the front lines.
If you want to hold national office you need to meet
the requirements that every E-5 sergeant in the Army needs to meet to hold that
rank, a background investigation to obtain a secret clearance.
One difference I would stipulate is that unlike the US military which refuses
people who have too much baggage in their background .... (OK before Bush broke
the military), the candidate gets to continue their campaign.
However with the
knowledge all their background info is PUBLISHED on their website with no
opportunity for editing by campaign officials.
If the voting public wants that candidate they can have them, but no
amount of media gotcha during the campaign or after the fact.
It just might take the real crooks like the Abramoff gang, Cunningham group and
people like Mark Foley, Tom Delay, Bob Ney, William Jefferson, out of
office.
BTW, yes even Bill Clinton and
now John Edwards would have had their personal secrets out in the open
before they get to try to lie about it during a campaign.
However think about it, how far would have Newt Gingrich have gotten if he had
to have been this open?
Could George W Bush have withstood scrutiny like this in 2000, especially his
inability to hide his military records?
Could more members of the Washington culture of corruption of the last decade have been able to stay as long as they have if they couldn’t hide their secrets?
Because really if you aren't reliable enough to become a Buck Sergeant in the
military, how are you reliable enough to hold office?








Comments (4)
Interesting idea and certainly worthy of debate on this forum...I'll be intersted to see what the "brains" around here come up with.
August 11, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
An added comment, the presidential candidates already make their VP choices to do this.
All officers in any administration like cabinet officials go through a more rigorous process like Senate confirmation, so maybe we need a system for the politicians themselves to go through.
August 11, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has always been a huge 'loophole' in the system that those who legislate laws and have security access as elected public officials do not have to undergo a thorough background check before able to declare candidacy.
Think this should be mandatory.
Thanks for post. Rec'd. Looking forward to comments and ideas.
August 11, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has always been a huge 'loophole' in the system that those who legislate laws and have security access as elected public officials do not have to undergo a thorough background check before able to declare candidacy.
Think this should be mandatory.
Thanks for post. Rec'd. Looking forward to comments and ideas.
August 11, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment