« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
A Mighty Wind
Several years ago, my wife and I attended an Audubon talk on wind power. I'm generally for wind power, but besides stats about killing birds and bats, they had some good environmental arguments against carving out areas of deep forest to place windvanes. I came away with the impression that wind companies were comporting themselves no differently than Big Oil or King Coal, hence my nickname of Mighty Wind, which implies that things don't smell right.
In Rural New York, Windmills Can Bring Whiff of Corruption sub
Lured by state subsidies and buoyed by high oil prices, the wind industry has arrived in force in upstate New York, promising to bring jobs, tax revenue and cutting-edge energy to the long-struggling region. But in town after town, some residents say, the companies have delivered something else: an epidemic of corruption and intimidation, as they rush to acquire enough land to make the wind farms a reality.
The local debates over wind power are driven in a part by a vacuum at the state level. There is no state law governing where wind turbines can be built or how big they can be. That leaves it up to town officials, working part time and on advice from outside lawyers, some of whom may have conflicts of their own.
There is no doubt that NIMBY is an obstacle to wind, but ramming it into communities is not going to help.





Comments (8)
I had thought the title of your post referred to McCain's after-dinner habits. My bad.
August 18, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't "Mighty Wind" refer to the Japanese belief during WWII that God was helping them win?
August 18, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was Divine Wind.
August 18, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any government-mediated program, from lowly zoning decisions to federal tax credits, invites corruption. The answer is vigilance, not stopping activity. If people show up at town council meetings they can steer the process.
There should, of course, be standards governing siting of turbines.
August 18, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well in the article ...
August 18, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, after the Audobon talk, can you explain how a turbine kills more than a tiny fraction of migrating birds that pass near it? Even if we assume all migration flight is at an altitude of less than 300 ft, the area of the blade is mostly empty space. If it turned at 1,000 RPM a bird would not make it through, but the typical speed is something more like 30 RPM. You or I could jump through.
Perhaps there is some attractive effect, like the whistling?
My observation is that most migration is at much higher altitudes than the height of the turbines I know of. Maybe in a particular mountain pass there is a channeling that delivers lots of birds to the blade, but still I wonder how more than a percent or so would be killed, even if all traffic went through a turbine. I suppose if there was a cascade of them, and a bird had to pass through all in succession, its odds would drop pretty low.
August 18, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This talk had to do with PA wind developers wanting to put turbines along pristine mountain ridges.
http://pa.audubon.org/news_20060119.html
Besides killing birds, they worry that clearing large discs of forest around each turbine base turns deep wood forest into shallow forest.
August 18, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent points.
We do need to emphasize that we will not tolerate eminent domain excess.
August 18, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment