« SOCKOBAMA SOCK MONKEY IS BACK ON SALE | ultramagnetic's Blog | HILLARY WANTS TO KEEP YOUR LOOT FOR 2012................ »

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford Hands Obama A Huge Gift On CNN Today


When asked by CNN's Wolf Blizter, today on Late Edition, What are some policy differences between Sen. McCain and President Bush, Gov. Sanford pause for several seconds looks around and then says "I'm drawing a blank here." He then follows this by a couple of more seconds of silence before bringing up Obama's stance on NAFTA saying Obama changed HIS position. When Blizter points out that McCain's stance on NAFTA is identical to Pres. Bush, Sanford replies "Of course it is."  Don't be surprised if somebody doesn't turn that exchange into a ad soon. I'll try to scrounge up video as soon as its available.

20 Comments

| Leave a comment

my governor, mark sanford, is a libertarian, not a republican, in all but name, and has spent several years spatting with his own, supposedly, gop legislature

mark sanford is a fraud, it is well known, mostly to south carolinians

Good try! From now on whenever a member of either party makes an humungous gaffe, we just say that guy is a ___________ in ALL BUT NAME. The fact that governor Sanford ran as and was elected as a republican and continues on with the republican party probably won't be noticed as long as you say he isn't. It's kind of like pointing at a giant snake in your bedroom and telling your wife not to be afraid because it's really a bunny. LOL!

No, actually blackflag's post is pretty close to the truth. He's made lots of Republican enemies since becoming governor.

user-pic

He just made a few more.

user-pic

Gaffs like that are priceless...

I was astounded. McSame's camp cannot be happy with their surrogate’s performance.

It was like asking a difficult question in a job interview regarding ethics or on details of someone's resume. He failed miserably to instill any sense of honesty or come close to answering the question. He couldn't put in favorable terms for McCain.

It clearly demonstrated... McCain = Bush

Meanwhile, I was flipping back and forth (I know, get a life) between Wolfee and Meet The Press.

Was it just me, or do others think Sen. (D-Mo) Claire Mccaskill kicked the "adviser to John McCain", Carly Fiorina’s, butt?

It was clear to me that when one has the high ground with regards to real issues it isn't hard to do well on behalf of your candidate.

Poor McSame surrogates.

Speaking of McSame, you look familiar! ;)

I didn't get to see MTP, but McCaskill is usually a staunch Obama supporter and Fiorly for all her 'executive skills' was sent packing from the HP board room, so I am not surprised that she couldn't hold a candle to McCaskill.

Besides Carly is soooo arrogant, she once told a roomful of share holders, that just because they were an American company didn't mean they owed Americans jobs...of course she was into outsourcing and NAFTA.

So, I am glad McCaskill wipe up the floor with Carly.

I watched the Fareed Zakaria interview with Obama and it was excellent. This is the type of interview we want to have of our Presidential candidates, it was substantative and very cogent analysis on the part of Obama. He knows foreign cultures, nuances of tribalism as well as having a mother who pioneered Microfinancing internationally.

Listening to Obama talk just made him that much more impressive the level of detail he grasps is soooo refreshing after having had a nitwit for President for 8 years, you just sit in wonderment at the lack of leadership we have tolerated for 8 years shaking your head and going WTF, how the hell did America sink so EFFIN low in the world?!

Obama had read Zakaria's book as well about a month before the interview and that was noted with a powerpoint slide as they headed to break.

The crawl at the bottom of the screen was about Brangelina's twins, though their names etc.

BUT, I will settle for that type of info if I can have the real deal in interviews on the news...leave the distractions to the crawl at the bottom.

About Mark Sanford: it is the opinion of most of the South Carolinians I know -- and I know plenty -- that Mark sometimes shoots himself in the foot, as a politician, by being a pretty straightforward guy who still has a naive fondness for telling the truth as he sees it.
So I would not read his stammering delay as a lack of preparedness, as the question he was asked today was one he surely anticipated. My guess would be that his penchant for telling the truth as he sees it, particularly under the spotlight of national TV, rendered him unable, in the moment, to go with the whopper that would have been required.

That said, Mark, though genuinely a nice person, is not necessarily the most organized or the brightest bulb in the bunch. Bright enough, of course, to already be a governor when he only entered politics in the early 90's. But not bright enough to know, during his first campaign, that my address was not part of his gerrymandered district. (I wasn't bright enough to know that either, but then I wasn't running for office.)

The net result of his oversight, and my wrong assumptions, was that I threw a Q&A fundraiser for him right before the election -- when time was increasingly precious -- for a roomfull of people who, in the end, could not vote for him.

Now here's where I give Mark credit as a good man if not a ruthless politician. His staff figured it out during the afternoon of the night in question. And told him. And called me. And so I offered to cancel the event so that he could apply his time elsewhere. But Mark said no, that if people had made a commitment to come, then he was not going to disappoint them. And so he showed up, and was gracious, and attentive and patient with people asking question after question as hours ticked by.
And maybe that sense of fair play, however unusual is why he's the governor now.
I, for one, think it's a shame he's a Republican. I disagree with a lot of his positions, but I know he has them from conviction and not expediency.

Much more often than not - your comments positively deliver salient facts, insight and critical data. Thanks.

BLITZER: Are there any significant economic differences between what the Bush administration has put forward over these many years as opposed to now what John McCain supports?

SANFORD: Um, yeah. For instance, take, you know, take, for instance, the issue of -- I'm drawing a blank, and I hate it when I do that, particularly on television. Take, for instance the contrast on NAFTA. I mean, I think that the bigger issue is credibility in where one is coming from, are they consistent where they come from.

You can watch the video clip here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/13/mark-sanford-draws-a-blan_n_112391.html

And to think that Sanford is supposedly on McCain's short list. :)

Listening to that stumbling and bumbling makes clear what the REAL talking point was and that is to paint Obama as inconsistent and a flipflopper, that was the point that Sanford wanted to make but he realized he couldn't do that about Obama on the economic issues!

Ha, ha, ...that made his talking point come across as out of the box...and he gamely tried to inject the talking point which did not relate to economic issues...hahaha

Then, he ALSO couldn't say how McCain was different from Bush without making McSame looked like it was HIM that had actually not been inconsistent...aha haha...I bet Sanford did have a brain fart based on the facts he knew to be true.

lol lol...good one...

rabbit hole on C&L.com:

It should scare you shitless that someone like McCain is running for the most powerful office in the world and as president he hasn’t got a clue as to what is happening at the street level with regard to peoples financial problems. Worse, he surrounds himself with self serving, bloviating idiots like Phil Gramm who was more interested in cutting fat financial deals with foreign banks likes UBS that are teetering on insolvency. Yeah, it’s all in our heads. It’s a mental thing. Tell that to the millions that go to bed hungry every evening, or tell it to the elderly who have to decide daily whether to take medications or eat. We as Americans should be sick to our stomachs when people like McAsshole and his economic guru start blaming you for their f**k ups, their lack of oversight on their watch. More and more that old saying ” Let them eat cake” comes to mind when thinking of Rethuglican economic objectives. Too bad we don’t have use of that very effective device known as the guillotine as it might be kinda fun watching a few heads roll down Pensylvania Avenue.

and:

I mean they KNOW that Obama and the Democrats are painting him as Bush III, and they can’t get together and come up with even bullshit ways in which he is different? They have to KNOW that people are going to ask about his economic stands, and they have nothing prepared? This really is some piss poor management, and McCain wants to run the country?

Millions going to bed hungry? Get real! With all the money that is available, from AFDC to WIC, from food stamps, EITC, section 8, HEAP, and all the others, and you are seriously going to tel me people are starving? BULL! And that tripe about medicine or food, remember the medicare part D that Bush created? Or the PPA program run by the drug companies? Again, total BS. And as far as blaming McCain for everything, remember Saint Obama is in the same body of Congress, and his party in in control, so why no blame for him?

Americans are just whiners, bulldog must be another condescending McSame campaign spokesman.

It is not that they have nothing prepared, it is that the talking point is that Obama is inconsistent. BUT, Wolf did not ask about an issue that Sanford or the GOP could demonstrate Obama as inconsistent..that is what trapped Sanford like a deer in headlights. The operative word was 'different' and Sanford was supposed to spin that into an Obama ding on inconsistency but he couldn't. That left him talking about how Obama differed from McCain, but the question was about Bush, so he looked really bad as now he couldn't retract the statement on economics about McCain which was THE SAME as Bush's!!

Hahahaha..Blitzer got him good...Sanford was left with NO SPIN!!

the fact he ran as a republican is due to the fact that is the only venue to election

he is certainly a republican, but his legislature mocks him he is a weak governor due to the peculiarities of the south carolina system of government, he is pretty much ignored by his state party, he is photogenic, but real influence and clout, nada, none, zilch

Thanks to Kaneblues for posting that link.

Do Republicans have a problem with Bush's policies or his execution/lack of competence?

user-pic

Well as this household is concerned Gov Sanford will join the unemployment line himself this next year.

We have 3 registered voters in this house and we see nothing that Gov Sanford is or has done for the people of South Carolina so join with us next year and send Columbia our message and Vote Vote Vote Sanford out.

Leave a comment

ultramagnetic

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address