Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Slim Pickens' Energy Plan: Separating the Beauty from the Beast

One of my favorite Disney movies as a child was Beauty and the Beast. From a child who was born with a thrill for taking ugly, mean things and making them beautiful (I was really into painting old furniture), you could see the appeal: a stubborn and self-serving beast was transformed into a sweet, giving prince through the healing power of love. Oh, if only real life was this idyllic.

Unfortunately, in the real world, wealth and power don't magically yield to justice and conscience, even if it's presented as such on the surface. Take oil tycoon and bill-footer of last election's Swift Boat crusade T. Boone Pickens. Pickens has been on a $58 million publicity tour to promote his plan to erect wind turbines in the Midwest. “The United States is the Saudi Arabia of wind power,” the website for his plan says. “The [United States'] addiction [to foreign oil] has worsened for decades and now it's reached a point of crisis.” Pickens has leased hundreds of thousands of acres for a giant wind farm in West Texas, where he plans to erect 2,700 turbines and produce energy for urban areas such as Dallas and Fort Worth.

A Texas oilman pursuing his own private crusade to make wind power a reality in the United States? Sounds like a fairy tale come true, right? Not quite. Half of Pickens's plan calls for more support for wind power. The other half calls for a large-scale conversion of motor vehicles to natural gas -- another finite, carbon-spewing fossil fuel. Kind of like shifting our addiction from heroin to crack cocaine.

It turns out that Pickens' main concern is not really about the harm that our country's main sources of energy are having on our environment. Turns out, as predictable as it is, the oilman's man concerns boil down to money. Pickens plan for wind energy is both a lucrative investment for himself, and a plan to address the increasing costs of energy in the United States, so it comes as no surprise that he plans on taking the freed up natural gas from his wind turbines and using it for transportation. It's a win-win plan for him, but a win-lose plan for the public and the planet.

Which is why it's a little disconcerting to find that many a progressive leader are singing his praises. With all the latest compromises our Democratic-controlled Congress has been rolling out- FISA, the war budget, etc. - the Pickens Plan poses a similar danger for the ostensibly greener party not doing what is needed to turn our country around.

Pickens is testifying before Congress and running ads calling on the American people to back his Pickens Plan. It's clear that Pickens is seeking widespread support for his half-baked energy plan. Let's tell him we'll support his plan if he drops or changes the second half -- like, say, a crash program to double fuel efficiency standards, accelerate the development of plug-in hybrids and electric cars, and bring our public transportation systems into the 21st century, including high-speed rail. Email Melissa McKay, PR for The Pickens Plan, and tell her that we want Pickens to finish what he started.


Comments (17)

Yep. You nailed it INO. Better than that, you proposed something constructive, and actionable. (Sorry. Just typing a word like "actionable" hurts me.) Anyway... I'm fine with T. Boone on the front end, but the natural gas cars thing is a stinker. A dead end. And I'm 100% with you on your constructive alternative - efficiency, PHEV's & electrics, and rail. Now let's see how many people take this as seriously as those "High Level" issues we all love to discuss. Good one, and Rec'd.

Why thank you Quinn. Feel free to tell your friends about my campaign!

The following is an excerpt from Atlas Shrugged, © Copyright, 1957, by Ayn Rand. It is reprinted with permission from the Estate of Ayn Rand.

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?

"When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears not all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor--your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money, Is this what you consider evil?

"Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions--and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.

"But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is made--before it can be looted or mooched--made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced.'

"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss--the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery--that you must offer them values, not wounds--that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of goods. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best that your money can find. And when men live by trade--with reason, not force, as their final arbiter--it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability--and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?

"But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.

"Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants: money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth--the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one, would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve the mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Money is your means of survival. The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Or did you say it's the love of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money--and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.

"Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

"Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.

"But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or to keep it. Men who have no courage, pride or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich--will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt--and of his life, as he deserves.

"Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard--the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money--the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law--men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims--then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

"Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion--when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing--when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors--when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you--when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice--you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that is does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

"Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it bounces, marked, 'Account overdrawn.'

"When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world? You are.

"You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it's crumbling around you, while you're damning its life-blood--money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men's history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, whose names changed, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves--slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody's mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer, Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers--as industrialists.

"To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, a country of money--and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man's mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being--the self-made man--the American industrialist.

"If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose--because it contains all the others--the fact that they were the people who created the phrase 'to make money.' No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity--to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words 'to make money' hold the essence of human morality.

"Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters' continents. Now the looters' credo has brought you to regard your proudest achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power of the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide-- as, I think, he will.

"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice--there is no other--and your time is running out."

The above is an excerpt from Atlas Shrugged, © Copyright, 1957, by Ayn Rand. It is reprinted with permission from the Estate of Ayn Rand.

I'm willing to listen to a good idea no matter where it come from.

Two things about natural gas:

First renewability

Natural gas, mainly methane (CH4), is obtained mostly from natural gas wells or as a byproduct of crude oil production. It can also be a renewable fuel when biogas - also called digester gas, swamp gas, or marsh gas - is produced by the fermentation of organic matter including manure, wastewater sludge, municipal solid waste, or any other biodegradable feedstock.

Greenhouse pollutant

For instance, carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are reduced by more than 90 and 60 percent, respectively, and carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas, is reduced by 30 to 40 percent. When used in medium- and heavy-duty engines, CO and particulate matter (PM) reductions of over 90 percent, and NOx reductions of over 50 percent, have been demonstrated compared to diesel engines.

While still a green house it is one with a far lower effect on our environment, And while I do not believe it is the ultimate answer it's a step in the right direction. And t does moves us away from imported oil.

While Pickens main motive may be profit, so be it. If we are going to move away from a fossil fuel based economy the private sector needs to know it's a profitable business to be in.

Agreeing with jsfox.

And crack really is less addictive than heroine, btw.

Speaking from personal experience??

Not particularly personally, no.

I believe cocaine to be more readily/immediately addictive - but believe heroin/opiates to be more of a bitch -entrenched- long-term.

FWIW.

It's a win-win plan for him, but a win-lose plan for the public and the planet.

You know I find your conclusion on Pickens disturbing, since when is he "public property" you act as if he as an oilman promoting wind, pointing out the damage to this nation by oil imports, and suggesting we use less oil "win-lose plan for the planet?"

Where the fuck did you get the idea he was Al Gore with a comprehensive plan?

Was it not enough that he put BILLIONS of his own money into an effort to make the US the number one provider of wind energy in the world??

And why SHOULD HE NOT be the beneficiary of his investment?

What are you some kind of fvcking socialist?? Where is your kid sucking on a box of juice when I'm thirsty... your kids juice = mine???

The point where I always deviate with the eoo-radical ludit or intellectually lame is where you decry capitalism.. you fvcking ingrate.

Your a fvcking loser..


Hard to follow and insulting to boot.

That's a whole lot of anger you're spewing, and undeservedly so. You're allowed to disagree with me, but I'm allowed to question someone's motives, especially someone who funded a public mudslinging campaign, attacking a veteran's purple heart.

I totally dig everyone else's rational, respectful considerations of my blog. But the fact that you resort to calling me a loser and an ingrate really speaks more about you than it does about your argument.

I know you just got booted because of your comment, but I felt the need to respond anyway. Good riddance.

avatar

I'm still trying to make up my mind about the Pickens Plan, but one thing I like about it is it moves us off the place we've been sitting since the 1970's.

Pickens' current commercial does an excellent job of laying out the disastrous economics of our oil imports, if not oil's disastrous effect on the environment. It just may be economics will be the most persuasive argument for most people. He describes himself as an oil man, and says we can't drill our way out of this hole. It really is a powerful commercial, and he deserves our thanks for that, if for nothing else. (Readers who haven't seen it should go directly to YouTube.)

As you say, he wants to replace the role of natural gas plays in producing our electricity (i.e., 22%) with wind power. Then he would use the natural gas (much cleaner than oil) for transportation (the technology is already proven and in use) to replace as much of our oil imports as possible. He sees this as a temporary measure while we develop other fuels (hydrogen, electric, whatever). He fudges that last point, apparently because he doesn't expect to be alive when it's done (he's 80), but he does make it.

I agree that it's not a complete plan, and it has the suspicious, oh-by-the-way effect of making him a lot of money. It will require a lot of eminent domain-type seizing of land. But it's a serious plan from a man who has the money to make a lot of it happen, and he's putting it on the table. If we implement it, we will be in a better place than we are now.

While I would support a crash program to "double fuel efficiency standards, accelerate the development of plug-in hybrids and electric cars, and bring our public transportation systems into the 21st century, including high-speed rail," we just don't know how long that will take. We know it will require huge investments in things like train cars.

Pickens is describing a way to get wind power into the picture in a serious way (do you know anybody with a better plan to do that?), convert transportation to a cleaner fuel, significantly reduce our use of oil, and significantly reduce our oil imports. I trust the man as far as I can throw him, but this is the most concrete proposal I have ever heard. I'm all ears for better ones.

avatar

jsfox is right TPM'ers, natural gas, due to it's structure of one carbon/4 hydrogens, is much cleaner than oil. Pickens idea is the only practical plan to produce energy in the USA>/i> and cut money wasted on imports. Pickens is 80 and is already rich, he is exactly the sort of person to know about energy so I would listen up.

We need a national grid to make wind power practical, we need the Renewable Energy Act 6049 passed see link

Unfortunately, without some leadership from Washington and a better educated public nothing will be done but the usual political gridlock and MSM pablum about stuff like Cindy's hairstyles.

One problem with the Pickens plan is that we're very likely facing a shortage of Natural Gas in North America, too.

My reaction is this outline for a 10 year moon shot for energy:

Remove ALL subsidies on oil, and related services immediately

Remove ALL subsidies on coal in 5 years

Heavily subsidize existing wind and solar technology but create an industrial photon tax on that taxes (TB Pickins) for sun energy falling on real estate zoned for wind and solar farms within the US boarders

Heavily subsidize private alternative energy R & D

Create the National Non-carbon Energy Administration (NNEA) and begin funding at $500 Billion per year forbidding private sector outsourcing.

Provide University endowments to create programs through Ph.D.s in energy; science, engineering, development, management and policy.

I posted this earlier today on another thread. The oxidation of methane is not only far cleaner than gasoline is does not require costly and complex cracking and distilling steps in its production. I have no idea what a gasoline powered vehicle requires for a conversion to burning methane.

Sorry, my endblockquotes haven't been working well. This should be outside of it.

"I posted this earlier today on another thread. The oxidation of methane is not only far cleaner than gasoline is does not require costly and complex cracking and distilling steps in its production. I have no idea what a gasoline powered vehicle requires for a conversion to burning methane."

He's got the prognosis right but strychnine won't cure the disease.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


October 6-10

Book Cover

October 13-17

Book Cover

October 20-24

Book Cover

November 17-21>

Book Cover

December 1-5

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address