Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Privatized retirement explained

Finely, a candidate has shown the courage to call Social Security exactly what it is: disgraceful.  Now this issue can once again become part of the national debate and help propel John Sidney McCain to his rightful place as leader of the Fee World.  The problem is complicated beyond the understanding of non-economists and non-Presidential candidates, but let me break it down to the basics.

The problem: people get old and stop working, but don’t stop spending money.

Old (disgraceful) thinking: the government collects money through a payroll tax to put into a common account.  When someone retires, that person draws on the account based on how much he/she contributed over time.

New (graceful) thinking: a private, for-profit, non-government company collects money through a payroll tax to put into a common account minus expenses.  When someone retires, that person draws on the account based on how much he/she contributed over time minus handling fees.

The old, disgraceful method has no easy mechanism for adjusting the amount of monies coming in without raising taxes.  Raising taxes is un-American (don’t let the flag pins those IRS folks are wearing fool you).

The advantage of turning over management of retirement plans to private, for-profit, non-government companies is something we economists like to call “fine print”.  A private, for-profit, non-government company can manage retirement accounts exactly the way they manage credit cards.  We all have credit cards and we’ve all seen the television advertisements that demonstrate how much more smoothly everything runs when we all use them.  A privatized retirement system would be just like that.


Comments (4)

I've never had a Credit Card. Visa & CapOne, et al. can go f#$% themselves.

I can't tell if this is snark or not. Even if you're really arguing for Privatized Social Security accounts, I'm all for this post taking up server space. Any post about any subject in the world that is non-FISA is better than a friggin' FISA post.

Are private accounts really a good idea? The short answer is, they could be -- but only if Americans are willing to wait several generations for the higher returns to make up for Social Security's expected shortfall. The gap is so large -- $3.7 trillion in today's dollars -- that even if the stock market matched its historical average, private accounts wouldn't fill the gap for something like 90 to 100 years. And that doesn't even count the extra $1 trillion to $2 trillion in transition costs required to set up such accounts.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_04/b3917001_mz001.htm

Well, I'm glad to see BusnessWeek agrees that privatization is a good idea.

So it wasn't snark. You do support privatizing social security.

Fleece! Fleece-Alert!! Fleece!

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address