Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Play To Win: Refocus On John McCain

avatar

When I'm not busy tracking McCaincient Moments (which keeps me well occupied most days), I find myself thinking about ways to ensure Democratic victory in the fall.

I believe we need to do a better job of keeping our fire concentrated on John McCain, along with the weaker congressional Republicans up for re-election this year.  I truly believe that a McCain presidency is inherently dangerous for the United States.  If we are truly playing to win in November, this needs to be shouted from the rooftops - actual and virtual.

This man is not fit for any executive position.  His shabby academic record says nothing for his analytical ability or his intellect.  His temperament, notoriously poor, is certain to rankle even those who are aligned with him.  His inattention to detail is startlingly similar to the current President.  These issues, and others, make him unfit to preside over the local Rotary, much less a nation in dire need of a real President after eight years of George W. Bush. 

This does not say that we should not talk about Barack Obama's decisions, political positions or shortcomings.  Quite the opposite.  If it was unpatriotic to question our leaders, we'd still be British, right?

One can have serious differences on major issues with a politician - but nonetheless support that politician.  (This may not apply if you are a true single-issue voter.)

Pennsylvania's Casey political dynasty is an excellent example.  The late Gov. Robert Casey was an ardent pro-lifer, and his son, Sen. Bob Casey, has the same position.  I couldn't disagree more with them on this particular issue.  However, given a choice between Bob Casey and Rick Santorum, it was ridiculously easy to pull the blue lever.

Folks, this election is even easier than that 2006 Senate election.  If there is ANY serious focus on John McCain, he will be destroyed at the polls.  His positions on education, foreign policy and the economy, combined with his illuminating displays of incompetence, make him more fit for caricature than inauguration. 

You could make an hour's worth of 30-second campaign spots just using video of McCain and blowups of interview quotes.  The DNC ad on McCain's "100-year" comment is an excellent example of the ads I think we should run.

There have been many great suggestions posted about ways to get more involved in the campaign.  However, the blogosphere can - and has - driven big news stories.  We should continue to drive the storyline on McCain's incompetence.  After all, the only reason McCain talks so much about Obama is to distract us from closely examining McCain.

So now, I am doing two things to increase the focus on the disaster of a hypothetical McCain Administration. 

First, I will no longer respond with any vitriol to any PUMA- or Clintonista-type trolling.  I reserve the right to post factual corrections, but no ad hominem hammers.

Second, I set up a $25 recurring donation at HillaryClinton.com that will run through November.  I wrestled about this one for a while.  I still have a hard time with helping to retire campaign debt when a campaign was as badly managed and personally destructive as Clinton's was. 

I've often said that Clinton was better than her campaign, though.  Had she taken more control of the strategy early, she could probably have avoided going way negative late.  I believe that money does talk loudest when it comes to support. So, that $150 is my way to bury the HRC axe I've been grinding.

I'm not urging people to go give Clinton money or unilaterally praise everything Obama does.  I'm asking for those of us who are Democrats to unify behind electing a Democratic president.  

We can have unity without being in lockstep on every issue.  Republicans generally understand that.  Democrats haven't always demonstrated that same understanding.

And if nostalgia dictates that you must line up in the traditional circular firing squad, fine.  Just make damn sure McCain and the GOP Congressional incumbents are in the middle before you chamber the first round. 


Comments (15)

I rec'd this, because I think you are correct that we should be hoisting John McCain on his own petard (or perhaps his absentee voting record in the Senate?).

But I don't get the part about the contribution to HRC's campaign. Are you paying her to go away? If she was some grassroots candidate who had to mortgage the house to run a campaign against some scumbag of a corrupt incumbent, OK - financial support would be important. But the Clintons are stinkin' rich by any measure, and the little loan she made to her own campaign isn't gonna force Chelsea to go to an in-state college. (Hasn't she already graduated anyway?)

avatar

(reply to Father O'KC; TPM's "reply" link isn't working for me right now)

Believe me, I know the Clintons are in a slightly different tax bracket than I am, although I'm not going to go hungry because of the donation. I made the donation for two reasons.

(1) She still has a big donor network that can write checks for much more than my little donation. I'm chipping in to help them get their pens out. If HRC's money people can raise $50-$75 million for the general election, my donation will be well worth the sacrifice of a few Extra Value Meals.

(2) It's counterproductive to hate Hillary Clinton - or any other Dem - at this point. My energy must go elsewhere. It's significantly harder for me to hate someone after I've contributed to them. So it's my way of closing the book on those sentiments.

This isn't necessarily for everyone, and I tried to make it clear that the point of my post wasn't to get people to donate to HRC. But it's my way of moving past the primary, once and for all. We should all find our own ways to do that - soon.

I applaud your focus. It is interesting that so many TPM posters spend more time and energy on critiquing Obama than McCain.

I have sent a small contribution to Clinton, but believe (my opinion) it's now more important to shore up the DNC coffers and Obama's campaign chest.

Thanks for post and rec'd.

avatar

Obviously your words are to be commended. Can you get the Hillary diehards to stop attacking Obama? I wish contributing to her would turn the tide, but I doubt it. In fact, the focus on her debt has distracted attention from the main issue.

avatar

Rec'd for the title alone!

They did a rerun here on cable last night of `So Goes the Nation` - the documentary on the 2004 election.

It was SO damned depressing, more because of what it said about what's going on now with this one.

More than anything for me it confirmed how incredibly clever the GOP machine is at both image creation and demolition and how badly the Democrats can stuff things when they just don't get it: ie how crucial it is to be just as damned good at getting across its image of McCain. Negativity is far more powerful than the positive: and so if Obama has to be putting forward a positive alternative in order to be consistent with his main theme, the DNC and all his surrogates HAVE to be focusing on on attack.

What was so crushing about watching it was how it exposed how issues could actually take a back seat to candidate image.

It reinforced for me how the only way we'll be able to overcome the GOP's portrayal of Obama as elitist will be to make an even more powerful portrayal of damaging McCain imagery.

(I read too many things online to remember always where I read them, but it was pretty depressing reading somewhere this morning that the MSM is letting McCain off the hook by focusing on the journalist reporting a positive thrust from McCain, with what McCain actually stutters and stuffs up only playing silently in the background.)


avatar

There's a spot on article about this need to hone in on McCain in The Guardian.

"The election isn't about Obama:
It's about John McCain and the failed policies and stale ideas of the Republican party"

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/07/play-to-win-refocus-on-john-mc.php

avatar

Great link.

I also think Fran, we need to become more active about going after the press and media when they spin these invalid and character assasinations of Obama.

We need to bombard MSNBC about Scaborough's, Gregory's and Barber's remark's about Obama not being able to take a joke, quoting Dowd to call him stultfying..and saying he is not able to feel people's pain.

This is the type of stuff that Dems use to let go in the past because we believed we needed to focus on policy. However, it is these types of rumors, smears and innuendos that destroy our candidate, simply because folks don't get policy but they DO get personality as they all know someone who acts like the media is characterizing Obama as...and so it is far more powerful and destructive.

These are the remarks we have to hammer, rebutt, refute, reject and denouce just as vociferously as we do policy details.

All of this character assasination stuff is swiftboating.

Dems need to recognize this and start being pro-active or Obama will be destroyed, labelled and framed as an 'elitist, stick in the mud bloody bore who talks down to us' before he even has a chance to accept the nomination in Denver.

I implore all Obama supporters to take action and stand up against this character defamation, if we want to win back the WH.

Their tactics are clear...we just have to ACT.

I think Boyd's point is that the Hillary payment is just part of the ecosystem - if we're going to bring everyone together, dealing with the remnants of her campaign is just one of the responsibilities like campaigning in Florida and healing the no-vote counted scandal or pulling together the Hispanic vote. Just put it on the to-do list, you'll see - turns a huge distraction into a minor task.

avatar

I think we need to fund the Democratic nominee and focus on him having the enormous sums of money needed to win.

HRC can bankroll her own loss. The remains of her campaign are her responsibility and not the Democratic party. Not when each and every single nasty attack she made is now being used on the nominee, from national security to his not meeting the commander in chief threshold, to his chair of subcommittee, to muslim garb.
HRC created a situation that demands even more money to fund the Dem nominee so that he can overcome the very obstacles she put in his path during her losing campaign from March to June.

Nope. Let her fund herself.

I am funding the winner, so he can win again in Nov.

avatar

For me, donating to Clinton is more about saying, "The primary's over; now I'll do what I can to help her so she will help Obama more."

The HillRaisers are needed for the GE. They won't come off their wallets until Obama donors help with Clinton's primary debt. So, to me, the donation is worth it.

Again, though, the donation was MY way of burying the primary grudge. You may have other ways of doing it, and that's cool. But there's no question that the primary needs to fade away NOW, so we can focus on the McCaincient Maverick.

avatar

My first test of my no-attack response...

...and I passed! Because I'm letting the "scandal" comment go. :-)

Well done.

avatar

"healing the no-vote counted scandal"...

Part of me wants to respond in vitriol, but the rest of your comment was accurate, so I won't even worry about a factual correction.

Great post, Boyd! Obama and debates about the primary are normally so much more entertaining than McCain, so it's easy to lose focus, but I think it will happen with some work and time.

avatar

That was in response to Desi. Is anyone else having to check the box to reply to someone now after you select reply? It used to pre-check.

Yep, and if you aren't logged in when you click on 'reply', you'll have to go back up and click on that reply to get the little check box.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address