« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Maybe Clark Should Have Said It This Way??
The Myth of McCain as a Military Genius
There's a certain Myth that has attached to John McCain regarding his expertise in National Security-Military-Foreign Policy matters.
Its foundation rests on two blocks of concrete, in the public's mind:
1. His father retired from the US Navy as a four star Admiral who served as CINCPAC during the VietWar; his grandfather also retired from the US Navy with the ranks of four star Admiral. Those are facts, and make for a fine family history.
John McCain himself did not achieve the rank of four star Admiral in the US Navy, however. And, second;
2. John McCain was held by the Viets as a POW for something like 5 years and certainly underwent serious physical and mental abuse by his captors. He suffered those abuses in the service of his country.
That is a fact, and it cannot be taken away from him.
He has stressed his military service during his political career, and does so now. His bravery and general toughness is beyond question...the guy's no wimp.
But now he is being called upon to transcend physical bravery and demonstrate to the voting public that he has the intellectual skills required on a president, a Commander in Chief, a rank even his distinguished father and grandfather did not achieve.
Candidate McCain is not doing a very persuasive job of demonstrating the deep thinking required of a president, nor of a four star Admiral, for that matter. The campaign is exposing his confusion and superficial understanding of the politico-military issues facing the United States in Iraq and elsewhere. Only the most partisan of Republicans could argue that McCain has thus-far displayed the intellect, the nuanced thought, required of a president.
His Democrat opponent merely has to stand aside and let McCain speak. As the words flow from his mouth, his status as a national security diminish, word-by-simplistic-inaccurate-word.
I'd still like to see Obama pick Biden or Ret. four star Admiral Falon as his running mate, more for Barack's own good than anything else.
But McCain is killing himself softly, with his own words.
Posted by FredrickBernanke at 7:19 PM June 14 on:
http://ProteanPerspectives.blogspot.com








Comments (4)
I agree with your assessment of McCain but not your conclusion.
Obama can bolster the national security debate by announcing superb choices for secretaries of Defense, State and Homeland Security.
What I think he needs in a VEEP choice is someone who people have enormous confidence in to help him cope with the disastrous economy and energy debate.
Any takers for who that would be? (I had been thinking Dodd until his mortgage scandal)
July 1, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
pn,
I think it would be interpreted as weakness if O announces his Cabinet choices prior to his election; either that or presumptuousness.
He's not being questioned on his abilities regarding domestic/economic matters; he's being attacked on policy grounds. In fact, it's McCain that's an absolute zero on the domestic/economic front.
And frankly, none of the Dems have been particularly outstanding on economics either. Not one pops into mind who has taken a leadership role in the mortgage/housing/credit market collapse, nor on the oil/commodity speculative boom.
He needs to shore up his National Security flank with his VP choice; my opinion is Joe Biden does that best.
FB
July 1, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe Obama should have answered the sobby McCain this way:
"“We’re running for the hardest job in the world. You’re not going to get any breaks from Putin. You’re not going to be treated nicely when you’re trying to deal with the Middle East,” she shot back."
–Hillary answering an attack weary Obama (Vanity Fair)
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/clinton200808?printable=true¤tPage=all
July 2, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why doesn't anyone asks those outraged journalists and pundits, or McCain himself, these two simple questions:
1. Has McCain ever held a position of command during war time?
2. Does riding a plane and getting shot down qualify one to be president?
If one of the answers is Yes, then Clark should, I guess, apologize. If both answers are No, then he's absolutely correct and they should all just get over it! McCain is what he is, nothing more. Being a POW must have sucked, but it doesn't make him god!
July 2, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment