Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Impeachment: Conyers "Seriously" Affirms "Duty" On Impeachment Allegations

avatar

The Chairman of the Judiciary Committee has allegedly made a statement contrary to his interests. This statement may be entered into evidence before a war crimes tribunal.


Did the House Judiciary Chairman's conduct satisfy the elements for a war crimes conviction on the grounds of malfeasance?

The Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee made an important statment. He has established/confirmed/asserted that the Judiciary Committee has a "duty" (his word) on impeachable offenses.

This is the Committee Chairman's position on impeachment allegations. The rules of evidence permit this statement to be entered before a war crimes tribunal:


"We take these allegations and our duty to respond to them very seriously"

In this statement, the Chairman has not specifically address the allegations of war crimes against the President.

This should prompt the public to ask the Speaker, Members of the House, Chairman, and the House Judiciary Committee:


What about other, more serious allegations on other impeachment cases: Is it not also the duty of the Committee to take those allegations against the President and Vice President seriously?

"Duty" is an imprtant factor in reviewing allegations of malfeasance against Members of Congress. A war crimes tribunal may consider whether the Members of Congress knew, or should have know, that a failure to perform one's duty could be malfeasance.

This Precedent may guide the court in adjudicating whether a member of Congress has or has not fully met their legal obligations under their oath of office, 5 USC 3331:


"An agency may also remove an SES employee under section 7543 for: "misconduct, neglect of duty, malfeasance" 820 F.2d 396


A failure to act, despite a known-asserted duty to act, is important. Nuremberg links the idea of malfeasance, war crimes, and adjudication for war crimes through impeachment or prosecution:


"Under any civilized judicial system he could have been impeached and removed from office or convicted of malfeasance"

The House Judiciary Committee has a duty to seriously confront the allegations of war crimes against the President and Vice President.

What You Can Do

These are important developments.


The public must remind the Chairman that he has a duty to take seriously the Kucinich impeachment resolution aainst the President and Vice President;

The public must pressure the House to remove Pelosi as speaker because of her decision -- in contavention to the law, her duty, and Nuremberg precedents -- to not seriously take these allegations, refusing to permit an impeachment investigation ("Impeachment is off the table"); and

The public -- absent action from the House Judiciary, Members of the House, Chairman Conyers, or Speaker Pelosi (Turley: "Collusion") -- must work with local prosecutors to directly prosecute this sitting President and Vice President, outside Congerss, outside impeachment.


Comments (18)

avatar

Always informative posts, testing. But how does the public force these issues in a way that's more effective. Calls, emails to reps are always good.

Can the public bring a case against the government for not pursuing impeachment?

avatar

Reading your stuff is like listening to a broken record. There will be no war crimes tribunal. The appropriate process is impeachment or censorship proceedings.

I realize that you only appear to have reference info on Geneva, but you really should attempt to learn the process of the American civics processes that have governed our nation for well over 200 years.

Your constant claims of war crimes and calls for tribunals add little to no value to the issue at hand.

You're wrong. War crimes do not have to be done in American courts. That is why there is a world court. It is unlikely that Bush and his criminal cohorts will ever be held accountable in the US. That does not mean they will never be held accountable. Maybe and maybe not. But the possibility is there.

You might want to read this: Bush officials HAVE been charged with war crimes.

Check it out.

avatar

No Joanne, I am not wrong. Prior administration have had members charged with alleged war crimes and nothing happens. I believe Kissinger was charged with such actions. In short, nothing happens.

The simple fact is the majority of Americans will not support a world court attempting to interfering within our civics system. If a world court attempts to do what you suggest, Bush and co. will garner sympathy of the populace/masses. Not a good move at all.

We have less than six more months of these incompetent individuals in this administration. We need to work to get Obama elected and then push the new AG to fixed all the executive orders and other moves by the prior administration not on the up and up.

JamesDD: This is my response to the Federalist Society posts from a few days ago... Wanted to make sure you saw it...

[[[JamesDD: No problem dude. I harbor no ill will towards you, just the Federalist Society which is looney toons. Jeez, this thread turned into one hell of an intense flustercluck of a battle between you two. Good luck my man!]]]

avatar

Wade,

No harm taken. I am neither a member or supporter of the federalist society. I personally have issues with testing attempting to slander and defame me as he does. The guy hates the fact some people out there hold him to the facts.

Keep up the dialogue and talk to you later.

Hi, James.

Why not come over to MY blog and start a fight?

You see, there WILL be a WAR CRIMES tribunal. Joanne and I are right, and YOU are wrong.

We needed to get O O O bama exposed for the rogue that he is .. Because you see, We want social justice.

It's a long hot summer until the conference in Massachusetts is held, and by then .. well, I think you'll find impeachment IS back on the table, which is the first step towards international JUSTICE.

More war crimes charges are being filed in other countries, all of which subscribed to the ICC.

You have been ASKED many times to cease and desist. If you come over to my blog, you are in Canadian country - which you, my friend, seem unaware still has the ICC and a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In just a few days, the tape showing Omar Khadr bears marks of torture will be released. This is the first true step in TRUTH in many a year against the TORTUROUS rogues (who also use depleted uranium).

Obama? Go take a leap .. Think the Manchurian candidate is gonna fight for FISA? Guess again. Keith has given him an Ultimatum. Think O's gonna listen? Well, only time will tell. O has a few days to "think" about it.

The world is full of suffering poeple who are yearning to be FREE and they don't want to stand by while you grate on our nerves about my real friend, "testing".


avatar

First off wack nut,

Your slander of Obama is unnecessary and unfounded. It truly demonstrates a lack of understanding the issues and/or understanding the facts at hand at all.

Second, this is a TPM blog that is put in place to spark debate not stifle it. I find constant push by wack jobs such as yourself and testing to stop debate because others such as myself point out the absurdity and idiocracy of your claims unfortunate and sad.

As for war crimes, it won't happen. It is sad you are living in denial, but such denial won't change the facts.

Perhaps it would be best if you simply go climb back under the rock you came up from.

avatar

Lady nut or should I just call you virginia,

There will be no war crimes tribunals, etc. Unless Bush and co. invade another country, nothing will happen. If they do invade Iran, I hesitate to speculate on what will occur.

As for your attempt to stop debate, you should be ashamed of yourself. The simple fact is on multiple occasions, I have pointed out the facts to the individual who goes by teh name testing, yet he or she intentionally continues to post false information. His or her pseudo self referential attempts at legal analysis are also poorly done and lack diligence and accuracy.

I can understand to the untrained eye or someone like yourself with their own personal agenda how you can latch on to such individuals as testing. After all, it is not surprising to see people of weak minded nature latch on to cult leaders. So you and testing's relationship, seems to be easily understood under such guise as well.

Good day and look forward to ongoing debates. I'll have the facts at my side and you and testing can have the fiction and half baked opinions you push forth.

avatar

virginia if that is your name,

I just reviewed your profile. You appear to be nothing more than a republican troll. Your comments are all negative attacks on Obama. The majority of our attacks are just slander or allegations that have been proven to be false.

Realizing who you are, I will no longer attempt to debate such a right wing nut as you. You should know that tpm is a progressive blog and as such, you will surely find that you and your views will not be that welcome here.

Thanx for the further indication that you are a complete ___________. (fill in the blank.)

I have no need to attack anyone. I did 20 years straight in AA and am a most affirming person (alhtough it makes most others uncomfortable).

Moi, a republican troll?
Gotta love it!
I got called "Rush Limbaugh on drugs" by someone when I pointed out what a certain Iconic Senator did to me,

So I've taken the slaps from the best of them.

But you, my fellow countrymen, had better think fast about how you want your planet to be run for the sake of your children.

Think seven generations' ahead before you SPEAK. I am a ninth generation American who is tired of the CRAP.

And as for knowing who I am, you have no clue.
Neither did "testing" in the beginning, but no he knows.

My Heart, my brain and my willingness to suffer for the good of all people cannot be changed.

Oh, absurdity of absurdities: How can a person for ARMS CONTROL and a Department of Peace be a right wing nut? Are you taking Orwell lessons from Herr MOOkasey?

Question, Jamiespoo: what did you do for someone else today? Just name one thing. Just one little thing. I am sure you can putcher headset back on and ignore the suffering of others. I've met your type before.

OBAMA IS A TOOL. Now, bite me!

avatar

Ok, are you a canadian or an american? It is clear from your rant you are still have issues with substance abuse.

Yes, I know your kind quite well. You do nothing for others, yet are always attempting to push yourself that you are.

Thank you for confirming that you are an asshole. And yes, your comments demonstrate you are nothign more than a republican troll. Other than that, I don't care who you are because you offer nothign of value and are more a detriment to getting solutions to americans problem than anything else.

Please kindly go back to your hole and stop posting your hate filled rants.

avatar
I have no need to attack anyone.

OBAMA IS A TOOL. Now, bite me!

With inconsistencies such as this, we are suppose to even take your comments as being rationale at all. virginia, you need to be consistent at the very least in the same comment.

Since you opened with an attack on me personally while I have being one to promote debate have only pushed the facts in testing's illogical fictional rants, I will comment on your background.

You appear to have had some interesting experiences as a stenographer and as a self appointed addiction specialist, however you are not the next best thing to slice bread as you put yourself out there to be. Humility is something you should learn.

As for you zealous push for war crimes, impeachment, etc., where will you go in a few months when Obama is president? Just another great benefit of having a democrat in office after this administration. crazed zealots like you will be pushed to the back burner where you belong.

I've had to read illogical comments from a few of you these past few days that argue for show trials etc. opposed to simply fixing the issues of the prior administration and moving on with the nation's business. many seem to fail to comprehend all the issues are nation is facing due to incompetent people running it for eight years. That is and where the focus will be on fixing these next few years.

Good day and if you have nothing to say other than personal attacks, do us all a favor and simply don't write a thing.

Wanna talk about PROJECTION, Jamie?

You are being REPORTED. CEASE And DESIST.

I live in Canada and I AM American, what's it to ya'?

Fortunately, although I went "through the mill" and took "the sharp end of the stick" I still have compassion and empathy - and I don't take shite from anyone.

Thought you weren't gonna engage this "right wing troll"? Oh, yeah RIGHT. You fancy yourself "terminally unique" and imagine YOU can do as YOU please. Yet, your projected taunts are recognizable to anyone.

I've got a nice set of heavy lawyers - want to TEST them ?? "Now toddle off, and go "fix" a jury and we'll let you have your pacifier!! Now see, isn't that better? That's a good boy!!"

The rest of us are looking for SOLUTIONS.

CoZmic Mommy

avatar

Please go threaten someone else. This is a public blog on TPM that is set forth to spark debate. It is unfortunate that you seem to fail to understand that and are now focused on threatening people.

As for projected taunts, you should read your own writing. As for reporting, I have already taken the liberty of reporting you to the TPM Administrators. As for your lawyers, you have no legal basis for any action. Sucks we live in a free society doesn't it virginia. In this society, I can disagree with you without as I have.

Please go pester and attempt to threaten someone else you shrill human being. You add nothing to the discussions at hand contrary to your allegation you add "solutions".

avatar
"Now toddle off, and go "fix" a jury and we'll let you have your pacifier!!

Lady,

Before today, I had no idea who you are. Now I see you are a shrill human being that gets pleasure in attacking others with viewpoints that differ from you and others who point out the facts.

It is unfortunate that you appear to discuss the allegations of testing that the Wecht Jury was allegedly tampered with and now you claim it was fixed. Such is false and demonstrates your outright lack of understanding of the case. There was no fix or jury tampering. There was a violation of a judge order alleged due to contact occuring with former jury members by the FBI.

Look forward to your next crazed response. You can take your threats of your "so-called" lawyers and punt for all I care. You can not stifle debate and I for one will not let you push misinformation as you are attempting to due here.

So call me boy or what not. Your stripes are pretty clear.

avatar

jimmy dean ,
boy you sure get worked up into a blathering forment sometime for someone who is so sure of himself . I for one would never want to see you 'stifled or intimidated " off this very public thread - This is just way to entertaining -so jimmmy dean keep insulting everybody here -it really adds levity to this thread ...

avatar

Oh Albie,

As always, thanks for your banter. These threads of testing are pretty worthless.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address